HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM - OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 56-98B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY (3)Timberline Road 1999 Am -Peak
Timberline Road 1999 Pm -Peak
Horsetooth to Drake
Horsetooth to Drake
Existing Signalized Locations
Existing Signalized Locations
Average
Average
Cycle Length
Efficiencv
Attainability
Intersection
Cycle Length
Efficiency
Attainability
Intersection
Delay
Delay
115 Sec.
.36
.76
24.3
120 Sec.
..37
.74
21.8
SeclVeh
Sec/Veh
BandA
SanhA
Band
)�adB
Green
Pm{ rtsma
rts
a tp
s
pie
Band
Spend
a a
A,
3 Be>zd
All
Speed"
. _..Peed
_
f
.:
44 SECS
38 MPH
39 SECS
38 MPH
37 SECS
38 MPH
51 SECS
38 MPH
Appendix A, has Print outs of Passer II runs w/Time Space Diagrams
T.hlr 2
Timberline Road 2020 Am -Peak
Timberline Road 2020 Am -Peak
Horsetooth to Drake
Horsetooth to Drake
Eidstina Signalized Locations
with Custer Drive Signalized
Avenge
Average
Cycle Length
Efficiency
Attainability
Intersection
Cycle Length
Efficiency
Attainability
Intersection
Delay
Delay
105 Sec.
.32
.96
29.5
105 Sec.
.34
.77
32.1
Sec/Veh
Sec/Veh
Band A
Band A,
Band B
Bated B
Band A
€ Band A
Band B
Band B
Green
Ptvgresion
Green
Progrexwon
Green
Progressiim
Green
Pragressian
Band.
Speed
Band
_.Speed
Band
Speed
Band
Speed
37 SECS
38 MPH
29 SECS
38 MPH
38 SECS
38 MPH
31 SECS
38 MPH
Appendix B, has Print outs of Passer II runs w/Time Space Diagrams
Tahle i
Timberline Road 2020 Pm -Peak
Timberline Road 2020 Pm -Peak
Horsetooth to Drake
Horsetooth to Drake
Existing Signalized Locations
with Custer Drive Signalized
Average
Avenge
Cycle Length
EMcienev
Attainability
Intersection
Cycle Length
Efficiency
Attainability
Intersection
Delay
Delay
105 Sec.
.32
.95
61.1
105 Sec.
31
.92
48.1
Sec/Veh
Sec/Veh
'
Band A
Band A
Band B
Band B
, r
2 -
Green _
Band
Prog vss-wu
Sgxd
Green
Band
Progression
SP? ed
Green
r ,�
.: ,
..
h
36 SECS
38 MPH
30 SECS
38 MPH
34 SECS
38 MPH
31 SECS
J 38 MPH
Anru-ndix C ha-, Print nntc of Pa.¢ser II runs_ w/Time
SDace
Diagrams
Custer Drive
Existing Signalized
Intersections
Drake Road
N
WI ►E
s
Timberline Road
TOTAL TRAFFIC
YEAR 2020
AM/PM
Progression Analysis
Vermont Drive
Horsetooth Road
Figure 1
5'
0
0
m
a
Drake Road
Custer Drive
Future Traffic Signal
Future Signalized
Intersections
Vermont drive
Horsetooth Road
dual left -turn lanes on all legs. This was not the case with
1 at the Timberline/Custer intersection. With a signal at the
intersection, a progression speed of 38 mph can be achieved.
gression bands are in excess of 30 seconds. With the shorter
Length, the average efficiency is 34%. This indicates good
sion will occur along Timberline Road with a signal at Custer
luring the morning peak hour.
able 3 shows the measures of effectiveness using the afternoon
peak hour traffic. The output and time -space diagrams are provided
in Appendix C. The three signal configuration is on the left and the
four signal configuration is on the right. With a signal at the
Timberline/Custer intersection, a progression speed of 38 mph can be
achieved. The progression bands are in excess of 30 seconds. With
a cycle length of 105 seconds, the average efficiency is 310. This
indicates good progression will occur along Timberline Road with a
signal at Custer Drive during the afternoon peak hour.
It is concluded that good progression can occur on Timberline
Road with a signal at the Timberline/Custer intersection. The signal
at this intersection will reduce/change volumes at selected movements
at the Timberline/Drake intersection. This has the effect of
improving the operation at this intersection. As indicated in the
geometric design prepared by JR Engineering, there is sufficient
separation between Drake Road and. Custer Drive to accommodate the
left turns with no conflicts.
00
-' r
MEMORANDUMCY) 14
LO
CD
CO
`?
o
TO: Dave Pietenpol, Wheeler Commercial !
`n
Eric Bracke, Fort Collins Traffic Engineer 7
O
6
0
FROM: Matt Delich
0
U
DATE: March 14, 1999
•
X
Q
Z
SUBJECT: Rigden Farms --Signal progression analyses for Timberline
Road (File: 9899ME03)
w
O
J
•
cTo
At the request of Eric Bracke, I performed signal progression
>
N
analyses for Timberline Road, from Horsetooth Road to Drake Road.
M
The purpose of this exercise was to verify that a signal at the
0
C
Timberline/Custer intersection would work in a signal progression
o
scheme along Timberline Road. These analyses were conducted for
_
existing conditions (1999), year 2020 with no signal at Custer Drive,
and year 2020 with a signal at Custer Drive. Existing and future
Z
z
morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes were taken from
C3
Figures 2 and 12 from the "Rigden Farms Transportation Impact Study,"
N
c
January 1999. Existing volumes and forecasts at the Timberline/
N
Horsetooth intersection were obtained from Ruth Rollins, P.E. Figure
N
1 shows a schematic of the analyzed street segment. There are
currently signals at Drake Road, Vermont Drive, and Horsetooth Road.
The analysis used "Multiphase Arterial Progression Program," PASSER
II-90. The analysis utilized a very conservative approach, in that
only leading left -turn phasing was used at the subject intersections.
Larger bandwidths could be expected if leading and lagging left -turn
phasing were used. The analysis program was allowed to run to
achieve the "best solution." Given the number of westbound left -
turns at the Timberline/Custer intersection, this intersection will
fail with stop sign control, if it were not signalized. Therefore,
it would be converted to a limited turn intersection, probably right-
in/right-out. With this change, some of the movements at the
Ui
Timberline/Custer intersectionshould be reassigned to the
(L
Timberline/Drake intersection. This will particularly affect the
Z
westbound left turns, the southbound left turns, and the eastbound
w
throughs at the Timberline/Drake intersection.
w
(�
z
a
Table 1 shows the measures of effectiveness using the existing
JW
signals and the 1999 morning and afternoon peak hour traffic. The
Z
"A Band" is northbound and the "B Band" is southbound. The output
W
and time -space diagrams are provided in Appendix A. A progression
QF
F
speed of 38 mph was achieved in both directions in both peak hours.
p
Progression bands are in excess of 35 seconds. The average
'7
CL
efficiencies are 36% in the morning peak hour and 37% in the
Z
afternoon peak hour. This indicates that good to great progression
a
�
can occur along Timberline Road with the current conditions.
H
W
2
Table 2 shows the measures of effectiveness using the morning
LL
peak hour traffic. The output and time -space diagrams are provided
4
in Appendix B. The three signal configuration is on the left and the
signal configuration is on the right. With the reassignment of
Qfour
traffic to the Timberline/Drake intersection under the three signal
C
G
scheme, this intersection will not operate very well. It will