Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM, PARKSIDE WEST - PDP - 56-98G - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - DRAINAGE REPORT7T, '"TIM Vicinity Map PROJECT ,-51TE DRAKE RD. DRAKE RD. LJ > REGIONAL CH NN LLJ vi HORSETOOTH RD. 0) Of Lj LLI z 11-3 I LLJ m 0 C) HARMONY RD, I APPENDIX A MAPS AND FIGURES 7. REFERENCES 1. City of Fort Collins, "Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards" (SDDCCS), May 1984. 2. "Drainage and Erosion Control Report for Rigden Farm Filing One, P.D.P.", JR Engineering, September 1999.. 3. "Final Report for the Hydrologic Model Update for the Foothills Basin Master Drainage Plan", April 27, 1999, Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. 4. "Foothills Basin (Basin G) Drainage Master Plan", February 1981, Resource Consultants, Inc. 5. "Overall Drainage Plan for the Rigden Farm O.D.P.", JR Engineering, November 1999. 6. Soil Survey of Larimer County Area, Colorado. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service, 1980. 7. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual", Volumes 1 and 2, dated March 1969, and Volume 3, dated September 1992. Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 10 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 control soil erosion to the satisfaction of the City Inspector and to survive severe weather conditions. Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 9 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 1 5.2 Dust Abatement During the performance of the work required by these specifications or any operations appurtenant thereto, whether on right-of-way provided by the City or elsewhere, the contractor shall firmish all labor, equipment, materials, and means required. The Contractor shall carry out proper efficient measures wherever and as necessary to reduce dust nuisance, and to prevent dust nuisance that has originated from his operations from damaging crops, orchards, cultivated fields, and dwellings, or causing nuisance to persons. The Contractor will be held liable for any damage resulting from dust originating from his operations under these specifications on right-of-way or elsewhere. 5.3 Tracking Mud on City Streets It is unlawful to track or cause to be tracked mud or other debris onto city streets or rights -of - way unless so approved by the Director of Engineering in writing. Wherever construction vehicles access routes or intersect paved public roads, provisions must be made to minimize the transport of sediment (mud) by runoff or vehicles tracking onto the paved surface. Stabilized construction entrances are required per the detail shown on the Erosion Control Plan, with base material consisting of 6" coarse aggregate. The contractor will be responsible for clearing mud tracked onto city streets on a daily basis. 5.4 Maintenance All temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control practices must be maintained and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Straw bale dikes or silt fences will require periodic replacement. Sediment traps (behind straw bale barriers) shall be cleaned when accumulated sediments equal approximately one-half of trap storage capacity. Maintenance is the responsibility of the developer. 5.5 Permanent Stabilization A vegetative cover shall be established within one and one-half years on disturbed areas and soil stockpiles not otherwise permanently stabilized. Vegetation shall not be considered established until a ground cover is achieved which is demonstrated to be mature enough to Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 8 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 4.3 Storm Sewer System For the storm pipe design, the computer program StormCAD, developed by Haestad Methods, Inc. was used. StormCAD considers whether a storm pipe is under inlet or outlet control and if the flow is uniform, varied, or pressurized and applies the appropriate equations (Manning's, Kutter's, Hazen -Williams, etc). StormCAD also takes into account tailwater effects and hydraulic losses that are encountered in the storm structures. It calculates the losses through an inlet or manhole by allowing the user to assign a coefficient for the equation, hL = K*(VZ/2g) Where hL = headloss K = headloss coefficient V = average velocity (ftls) g = gravitational constant (32.2 ft/s2) The storm pipe design was performed for two different scenarios, the first being the runoff from the site into the North Tributary Storm Sewer (NTSS) and the second being for the ultimate build -out of Rigden Farm in the northwest corner of the development. This was done to ensure that the system for this project could be extended to include the commercial areas proposed in the northwest comer of Rigden Farm. The pipe design for the future development is included in Appendix E of this report. 5. EROSION CONTROL _ 5.1 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures Erosion and sedimentation will be controlled on -site by use of inlet filters, silt fences, straw bale barriers, gravel construction entrances, and seeding and mulch. The measures are designed to limit the overall sediment yield increase due to construction as required by the City of Fort Collins. During overlot and final grading the soil will be roughened and furrowed perpendicular to the prevailing winds. Straw bale dikes will be placed along proposed swales. Erosion control effectiveness, rainfall performance calculations and a construction schedule will be provided with the final report. Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 7 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 Table 3.1 Drainage Summary Design Point Tributary Sub -basin Area (ac) C (2) c (100) tc (2) (min) tc (100) (min) Q(2)tot (efs) Q(100)tot (cfS) 1 101 1.51 0.64 0.80 6.8 5.1 2.5 11.8 2 102 1 0.17 0.75 0.93 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 0.4 1 6.1 3 1 103 1 0.25 0.79 1 0.99 1 5.0 1 5.0 1 0.6 1 2.5 4. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS 1 4.1 Allowable Street Capacity The theoretical street and. gutter capacity was calculated using Manning's equation for open channel flow. Allowable gutter flows and maximum street capacities for both the initial and major storms were estimated and evaluated based on the specifications set forth in the SDDCCS Manual. During the initial storm, runoff was not allowed to overtop either the curb or the street crown for local streets. The 2-year storm was used as the initial storm for street capacity calculations. During the major storm, the depth of water over the crown or curb is limited to six inches. The 100-year storm was used as the major storm for street capacity calculations. See the street capacity calculations in Appendix C for more detailed information. 4.2 Inlet Sizing Inlets were sized using the computer program UDINLET that was developed by James C. Y. Guo of the University of Colorado at Denver. Computer output files for the inlet sizing are provided in Appendix D of this report. Inlets were designed to receive the 100-year peak flows. If for some reason these inlets were plugged, the flow would pond until it overtopped the curb and sheet flowed into the roadside ditch for Drake Road between Lois Lane and Rigden Parkway. These flows would then enter a culvert to be conveyed to the temporary detention pond. All inlet locations and sizes are shown on the. Utility Plans for the construction of this project. Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 6 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 3.4 Hydrologic Analysis of the Proposed Drainage Conditions The Rational Method was used to determine both 2-year and 100-year peak runoff values for each sub -basin. Runoff coefficients were assigned using Table 3-2 of the SDDCCS Manual. The Rational Method is given by: Q = CfCIA (1) where Q is the maximum rate of runoff in cfs, A is the total area of the basin in acres, Cf is the storm frequency adjustment factor, C is the runoff coefficient, and I is the rainfall intensity in inches per hour for a storm duration equal to the time of concentration. The frequency adjustment factor, Cr, is 1.0 for the initial 2-year storm and 1.25 for the major 100- year storm. The runoff coefficient is dependent on land use or surface characteristics. The rainfall intensity is selected from Rainfall Intensity Duration Curves for the City of Fort Collins (Figure 3.1 of SDDCCS). In order to utilize the Rainfall Intensity Duration Curves, the time of concentration is required. The following equation is used to determine the time of concentration tC=ti+tt (2) where tc is the time of concentration in minutes, ti is the initial or overland flow time in minutes, and 4 is the conveyance travel time in minutes. The initial or overland flow time is calculated with the SDDCCS Manual equation: ti = [1.8 /(1.1 - CCr)L0.5J/(s)0.33 (3) where L is the length of overland flow in feet (limited to a maximum of 500 feet), S is the average slope of the basin in percent, and C and Cf are as defined previously. All hydrologic calculations associated with the sub -basins shown on the attached drainage plan are included in Appendix B of this report. A summary of these calculations for the three basins is included in Table 3.1 below. Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 5 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 Design Point 1 , from which it will flow to the NTSS, and then continue to the detention pond. The undeveloped portion of Rigden Farm in the northwest corner of the development will continue to flow southeast as it has done historically. The ultimate storm sewer design for Rigden Farm and the portion of Drake Road that bounds it was designed to convey the runoff into the NTSS and then into the detention pond. This process will begin with the construction of storm pipe from Lois Lane to the NTSS. The storm pipe between Lois Lane and Rigden Parkway has been sized at a 54" diameter pipe to convey the developed flows for the system proposed in the drainage reports for Rigden Farm O.D.P. and Filing One, P.D.P. The calculations for the storm sewer system at total build -out are included in Appendix E. These calculations use the areas for basins in the Rigden Farm O.D.P. report with a maximum "C" value of 1.00. 3.3 Proposed Drainage Plan A qualitative summary of the drainage patterns within each sub -basin and at each design point is provided in the following paragraphs. Discussions of the detailed design of drainage facilities identified in this section are included in the following sections. Runoff from Subbasin 101 will be conveyed via sheet flow and gutter flow to the sump inlet located at Design Point (DP) 1. This storm flow will join flow from sub - basin 102 to enter the NTSS. Runoff from Subbasin 102 will be conveyed via sheet flow and gutter flow to a proposed sump inlet located at DP 2. Flow will join that from sub -basin 101 and enter the NTSS that outlets into the temporary detention pond at the corner of Ziegler Road and Drake Road. Runoff from Subbasin 103 will be conveyed via sheet flow and gutter flow to DP 3. From here, flow will be directed westerly on Limon Drive to an inlet that will deliver the runoff to Pond 218, located in Filing One of Rigden Farm. Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 4 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 3. LOCAL DEVELOPED DRAINAGE DESIGN 3.1 Method The Rational Method was used to determine both the 2-year and 100-year flows for the sub - basins indicated in this drainage report. Drainage facilities were designed to convey the 100- year peak flows. A detailed description of the hydrologic analysis is provided in Section 3.4 and Appendix B of this report. 3.2 General Flow Routing Flows within this site will take the form of overlot, gutter, and pipe flow. The proposed drainage patterns from the Rigden Farm drainage plans have been maintained as much as possible. The proposed drainage facilities for this site consist of proposed sump inlets, swales and drainage pipes. The southern portion of Lois Lane will drain to Limon Drive and then west to an existing inlet. The northern portion of the proposed street will drain to sump inlets on Lois Lane. From here runoff will be carved to the North Tributary Storm Sewer (NTSS). The NTSS delivers stormwater to a temporary pond at the corner of County Road 9, now Ziegler Road, and Drake Road during the interim conditions. When the NTSS and Rigden Farm Second Filing is completed, the temporary detention pond will be replaced by a permanent detention pond. Storm sewer service for the rest of the undeveloped area in the northwest portion of Rigden Farm and the southern half of Drake Road will not be interrupted by the construction of Lois Lane. Before Lois Lane is constructed, any runoff from Drake Road west of Rigden Parkway will enter a culvert under Rigden Parkway to flow to the temporary detention pond. When Lois Lane is constructed, the flow pattern is altered. The portion of Drake Road 'between Lois Lane and Rigden Parkway will continue to flow through the culvert under Rigden Parkway to the temporary detention pond at the intersection of Ziegler Road and Drake Road. The portion of Drake Road west of Lois Lane is ultimately supposed to enter the NTSS and be delivered to the detention pond at Ziegler Road and Drake Road. The street vertical design and the grading around it was performed to direct flows to the sump inlet at Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 3 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 1.4 Design Criteria This report was prepared to meet or exceed the submittal requirements established in the City of Fort Collins' "Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards" (SDDCCS), dated May 1984. Where applicable, the criteria established in the "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual" (UDFCD) dated 1984, developed by the Denver Regional Council of Governments have been utilized. 1.5 Master Drainage Basin Lois Lane lies in Reach 2 of the Foothills Drainage Basin. The master study for this area is the "Foothills Basin (Basin G) Master Drainage Plan" by Resource Consultants, Inc., 1981. Another applicable report is the "Final Report for Hydrologic Model Update for the Foothills Basin Master Drainage Plan" by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. (ACE) dated July 15,1999. The proposed street is also included in the "Overall Drainage Plan for Rigden Farm O.D.P." by JR Engineering, dated November 24, 1999 which incorporates the previously mentioned reports. In the Rigden Farm O.D.P. report the Foothills Drainage Basin models were updated with the proposed build -out of Rigden Farm including the regional pond to be built at the corner of Drake and County Road 9 (now Ziegler Road). As presented in the report, the southern half of Lois Lane was modeled to drain south onto Limon Drive and into Pond 218. The northern half of Lois Lane was projected to drain to the north and enter the North Tributary Storm Sewer. 2. HISTORIC (EXISTING) DRAINAGE The historic (existing) flows for the Lois Lane site consist of the flows from the site and some offsite flows from the west and north, including Drake Road. The drainage pattern for the property is via overland flow in a southeasterly direction at approximately 1 percent slope. The "Overall Drainage Plan for the Rigden Farm O.D.P." and "Drainage and Erosion Control Report for Rigden Farm Filing One, P.D.P." directed the general direction of stormwater from the Rigden Farm development and therefore, historic runoff calculations are not included as part of this report. Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 2 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description Lois Lane is a proposed approximately 560 lineal foot residential local road at Rigden Farm P.U.D. The road connects to Drake Road to the north and Limon Drive to the south. Rigden Parkway is the first road directly east of Lois Lane. The street lies in a portion of the North half of Section 29, Township 7 North, Range 68 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado. A location map is provided in Appendix A. 1.2 Existing Site Characteristics The site is primarily covered with native grasses and farmland. The site currently drains in a southeasterly direction at a 1 to 2 percent slope. The soil on the site is predominately Nunn clay loam (soil numbers 73 and 74) with slopes from 0 to 5% as shown on the soil map included in Appendix A (USDA SCS, 1980). Nunn clay loam consists of nearly level soils on high terraces and fans. Pertinent characteristics of this soil include slow to medium runoff, a slight hazard of wind erosion, and a moderate hazard of water erosion. Nunn clay loam is categorized as Hydrologic Group C. The other soil group found in the site area in limited amounts is Satanta loam (soil number 96), categorized as Hydrologic Group B. Medium runoff and moderate wind and water erosion characterize this soil group. 1.3 Purpose and Scope of Report This report defines the proposed drainage and erosion control plan for Lois Lane. The plan includes consideration of all on -site and tributary off -site runoff and the design of all drainage facilities required for this street. This drainage plan is consistent with the design concepts of the drainage report prepared for Rigden Farm Overall Development Plan (O.D.P.). Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 1 Lois Lane August 28, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TRANSMITTAL LETTER............................................................................................................. i TABLEOF CONTENTS................................................................................................................ ii 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................I 1.1 Project Description..........................................................................................................1 1.2 Existing Site Characteristics...........................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Scope of Report ..........................................................................................1 1.4 Design Criteria................................................................................................................2 1.5 Master Drainage Basin....................................................................................................2 2. HISTORIC (EXISTING) DRAINAGE................................................................................2 3. LOCAL DEVELOPED DRAINAGE DESIGN...................................................................3 3.1 Method............................................................................................................................3 3.2 General Flow Routing.....................................................................................................3 3.3 Proposed Drainage Plan......................................................:...........................................4 3.4 Hydrologic Analysis of the Proposed Drainage Conditions...........................................5 4. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS....................................................................................................6 4.1 Allowable Street Capacity ...............................................................................................6 4.2 Inlet Sizing......................................................................................................................6 4.3 Storm Sewer System.......................................................................................................7 5. EROSION CONTROL...........................................................................................................7 5.1 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures........................................................................7 5.2 Dust Abatement...............................................................................................................8 5.3 Tracking Mud on City Streets.........................................................................................8 5.4 Maintenance....................................................................................................................8 5.5 Permanent Stabilization..................................................................................................8 7. REFERENCES.........................................................................................I............................10 Appendix A: Maps and Figures Appendix B: Hydrologic Calculations Appendix C: Street Capacity Calculations Appendix D: Pipe and Inlet Calculations Appendix E: Pipe Calculations for Future Development Appendix F: Other Reports J•R ENGINEERING A Subsidiary of Westrian August 28, 2000 Mr. Basil Hamdan City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report for Lois Lane a Portion of Rigden Farm Filing 3. Dear Basil, We are pleased to submit to you for your approval, this Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report for Lois Lane, a residential road at Rigden Farm P.U.D. All computations within this report have been completed in compliance with the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria. We greatly appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this submittal. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, JR ENGINEERING Prepared by, �I Amber Reed, E.I.T. Design Engineer I I attachments Reviewed by, Kent Bruxvoort, P.E. Project Manager 2620 East Prospect Road, Suite 190, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-491-9888 • Fax: 970-491-9984 • wJrengineering.wrn PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL REPORT Lois Lane a Portion of Rigden Farm Filing 3 Prepared for: Wheeler Commercial 1027 W. Horsetooth Road, Suite 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 (970)225-9305 Prepared by: JR Engineering 2620 E. Prospect Road, Suite 190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 (970)491-9888 August 28, 2000 Job Number 9164.11