Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM, PARKSIDE WEST - PDP - 56-98G - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)unnecessary diffusion on adjacent property. The fixtures you propose are not shielded nor do they feature sharp cut-off capability. f. As stated in comment "t" of the first. comment letter, the total number of proposed trees must comply with the standards as specified in 3.2.1(D)(3). Since you are proposing 56 trees, this section of the code specifies that no more than 25% of those trees can be any one species. This limits any one species to no more than 14 trees. You have proposed one species that exceeds this limit. g. "Thick Butt Arch Shingles" is not a commonly used term. Please specify the Shingles to be "high profile shadowline" with a minimum 350 Ibs/square or something comparable. The shingles should be provided with a minimum of 2 shades, preferably two distinctly different shades of tan or brown. h. As discussed, the architectural elements of buildings M, N, & 0 need to be varied. i. The trash enclosure on the west side of Garage G-10 needs vegetative screening along its western side. j. Change Rutherford to Rockford. If you have any questions about these or any other issues related to this project please feel free to call be at 221-6750. Yo s truly, i Troy Jone City Planner Commur Planning and Environmental IS vices Current Planning City of Fort Collins STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Donald Leffler Design Development 2627 Redwing Rood, Suite 350 Fort Collins, CO 80526 January 19, 2001 Staff has reviewed your submittal for Parkside West at Rigden Farm, and we offer the following comments: COMMENTS: 1. Water and Sewer Utility Department, Stormwater Utility Department, Engineering, Transportation Planning, Zoning, AT&T Cable, Technical Services, Public Service, Post Office, Advance Planning: a. Please seethe attached comment sheets and/or redlined plans from these departments and agencies. 2. Current Planning: a. Section 2.2.11 of the Land Use Code requires that an applicant submit revisions based on this letter within 90 days or the project application becomes null and void. Your response to the City's concerns is due by April 18, 2001. A 30 day extension to this deadline is available. All requests for an extension should be directed to the Current Planning Director. If remaining issues are those that do not require plan revisions, a status report verifying continuing efforts toward resolving the issues is required within the some timeline. b. Why is there no access easement on the plat for the private drive/parking lots? The definition of private drive in Article 5 of the LUC specifies that a private easement for road purposes is needed. Check with Marc Virata in Engineering if this access easement is necessary. c. As discussed last week, the 2 plats need to be combined into one plat. d. Add another tree between buildings K & J, between building O & G-13. Full Tree Stocking is required in all landscaped areas within 50 feet of any building. Full Tree Stocking is formal and informal groupings of trees spaced at 30 to 40 foot spacing intervals. See section 3.2.1(D)(1)(c) of the LUC. e. Please revise the lighting plan to include the footcandle numbers throughout the site. Section 3.2.4 of the LUC requires light sources to be fully shielded and shall feature sharp cut-off capability so as to minimize up -light, spill -light, glare and 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020