Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM, 5TH FILING, TRACT I, SETTLERS GREEN - PDP - MODIFICATIONS OF STANDARDS - 56-98J - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES (3)Planning and Zoning Board Minutes March 15, 2001 Page 6 Mr. Jones replied yes. Member Craig stated that it was discussed at worksession that a second survey is done after the foundation is poured to make sure it is not over the lot line. Marc Virata, Engineering Department replied that a surveyor is the one who does the staking for a foundation. He suggested if a step further is needed that maybe some sort of certification be done. As it is stated now, it is not above and beyond what typically occurs. Member Craig was still concerned about mistakes being made with garages over the lot lines and what would happen if someone were to sell. Mr. Jones stated that in consulting with the Zoning Department about the eaves of the roof hanging over the lot line, they stated that they could not. So the foundations would have to be poured back a foot or so, so the zero lot line is really the eaves. The applicant does understand that. CITIZEN INPUT None. Member Colton recommended approval of the Modifications of Standards for Settler's Green at Rigden Farm PDP referencing the findings of fact and conclusions and with a condition of approval that they meet the conditions of Exhibit A. Member Carpenter seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-0. Project: Poudre Development Rezoning, #1-01 Project Description: Request to rezone the Poudre Development parcel from T, Transition, to CCR, Community Commercial River. The parcel is 21.7 acres in size and located on the east side of the Poudre River bounded by Linden Street, Buckingham Street and First Street. Buckingham Park forms the southeast border of the site. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes March 15, 2001 Page 5 Hearing Testimony, Written Comments and Other Evidence: Member Craig asked for staff to review the memo they just received regarding the condition and how that condition works. Troy Jones, City Planner replied that the condition would read: Staff recommends that the Modification to the Side Yard Setbacks be approved subject to the condition that the general notes on the site plan and plat for the Settlers Green PDP include all notes from the attached exhibit A. Exhibit A reads: 1. All foundations are required to be staked by a licensed survey company to insure that the foundations are built in the proper location and do not cross property lines or setback requirements. 2. Detached garages and living or office space above are subject to a 0' side yard setback; all buildings actually constructed with a 0' side yard setback shall have a one hour rated firewall along any common property line. 3. If a structure is built with a 0' side yard setback (i.e. on the property line), the adjoining property cannot also build with a 0' side yard setback on the same property line. 4. Purchasers/Property owners will be required to sign easement agreements which will contain the following item: "Exterior Maintenance: Certain exterior walls of the dwelling and/or garage may not be accessible from within the property boundaries of the lot which said dwelling and/or garage is situate. There is hereby created an easement for access upon the adjoining lands for the purpose of maintenance of exterior walls, windows, eaves, overhangs, and downspouts. The party exercising the right to utilize any such easement for maintenance purposes is hereby responsible for any and all damage caused by them to the property of the party upon whose lands the easements are appurtenant. Mere access for maintenance shall not be considered damage." 5. Any architectural features of each dwelling and/or garage such as eaves, gutters, downspouts or roof overhangs must be contained entirely on the property where the building is located. Member Craig asked about #1, and was it already a requirement that a surveyor come in and stake the property. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes March 15, 2001 Page 4 Mr. Schlueter replied that staff has not really got into yet what the design or fix will be for that intersection. Member Craig asked Mr. Schlueter to involve Mr. DiMirando in the process. Mr. Schlueter replied he would. Member Craig asked what the city was going to do to improve the health and safety of the children. Tom Reiff, Transportation Department replied that the Engineering Department has identified the north shoulder of Vine Street to be improved by paving the soft shoulder that is currently there. That would add approximately 6 feet of bike lane and give or take an additional 4 feet of pavement for the sidewalk portion of it. It will go from Lancer to the other edge of Lancer all the way out to Taft Hill. The County will also make improvements to their portion of the street. Member Craig asked when the construction would occur. Mr. Reiff replied that the actual construction will not take place until the asphalt plants open in the spring and then it will be phased in. He was not sure what the time frame would be. He sees this as being completed by summer. Member Colton moved for approval of the Lincoln Junior High School Addition, #40-00. Member Bernth seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-0. Project: Settler's Green at Rigden Farm PDP — Modification of Standards S� �O�2 3 Project Description: Request for two Modifications to Section 3.5.3(D)(3) of the Land Use Code. Recommendation: Approval with Conditions Planning and Zoning Board Minutes March 15, 2001 Page 2 17. #43-98E Coyote Ridge 61h Annexation and Zoning 18. #3-01 2021 Timberline Lane Rezoning 19. #12-97D Harmony Technology Park, Hewlett Packard — Project Development Plan Member Colton and Chairperson Gavaldon declared a conflict of interest on Item 19, Hewlett Packard. Member Bernth declared a conflict of interest on Item 18, 2021 Timberline Rezoning. Lynn DiMirando, citizen asked for Item 3, Lincoln Jr. High School Addition be pulled for discussion. Betty Aragon, citizen, asked for Item 7, Poudre Development Rezoning be pulled for discussion. Member Craig asked for Item 4, Settlers Green at Rigden Farm, PDP, Modification of Standards be pulled for discussion. Member Carpenter moved for approval of the Consent Agenda items 1, minus the May 18th minutes, 2, 5, 6, and 8. Member Bernth seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-0. Project: Lincoln Junior High School Addition, Site Plan Advisory Review, #13-98B Project Description: Request to expand Lincoln Junior High School by constructing a new building containing 19,497 s.f. The building would feature classrooms, computer lab, gymnasium, recreational facilities and kitchen. The predominant after school user would be the Boys and Girls Club of Larimer County. The site is approximately one acre and zoned UE, Urban Estate. Chairperson Gavaldon called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. Roll Call: Colton, Bernth, Craig, Gavaldon, Carpenter and Meyer(late). Member Torgerson was absent. Staff Present: Gloss, Eckman, Jones, Moore, Shepard, Olt, Grubb, K. Moore, Reiff, Schlueter, Wamhoff, Virata, Wilder, Bracke, Daggett. Agenda Review: Director of Current Planning Cameron Gloss reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agendas: Consent Agenda: 1. Minutes of the May 18 (Continued), October 19, 2000 and January 18, 2001 Planning and Zoning Board Hearings. 2. # 6-01 Harris Bilingual Elementary School Expansion — Site Plan Advisory Review 3. #40-00 Lincoln Junior High School Addition — Site Plan Advisory Review 4. #56-98J Settler's Green at Rigden Farm, PDP — Modification of Standards 5. Modifications of Conditions of Final Approval 6. #7-01 Staley Annexation and Zoning 7. #1-01 Poudre Development Rezoning 8. #2-01 Speights PUD, Lots 6 & 7 and the West Half of Tract A Rezoning Discussion Agenda: 9. Recommendation to City Council for Adoption of the Transfort Strategic Operating Plan 10. #40-98 Cathy Fromme Natural Area Annexation and Zoning 11. #40-98A Cathy Fromme 2"d Natural Area Annexation and Zoning 12. #43-98 Coyote Ridge 1st Annexation and Zoning 13. #43-98A Coyote Ridge 2"d Annexation and Zoning 14. #43-98B Coyote Ridge 3rd Annexation and Zoning 15. #43-98C Coyote Ridge 4th Annexation and Zoning 16. #43-98D Coyote Ridge 5th Annexation and Zoning