Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM, 7TH FILING, THE WILLOWS - PDP - 56-98N - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE REQUESTFrom: Tim Dunn To: Troy Date: 11/9/2001 Time: 8:30:40 AM 6. How does the proposed alternative landscape plan mitigate air pollution equally well or better than a plan which complies with the standards? Tbnpmpo ed landaapep w pmaider mom tnu then are nguirrd which would pmwde iron mWjv pmdadion and filknog of a rpol/wtlon. Page 3 of 3 7• Explain the whether and the extent to which the alternative landscape plan preserves and incorporates existing vegetation in excess of minimum standards? The rift has three ties af4aifacunt rite, whir$ an bang raved to retain tbt character. Tlx existing VMS w being saved it important for the Hama of the pmjact and it port of the pnrermd open .space iaauxwmied in the ritap/,m 8. Explain the whether and the extent to which the alternative landscape plan protects natural areas and features? Not rpiplraahk- 9. Explain the whether and the extent to which the alternative landscape plan maximizes tree canopy cover? The pmpwred 1aedlriape plan with the use of am mantal tnu diWmfau tha ttrretrcape and sh7lpmm&r Am that rraeb 15— 30 ft in canopy height. 10. Explain the whether and the extent to which the alternative landscape plan enhances neighborhood continuity and connectivity? Not apphcabk. 11. Explain the whether and the extent to which the alternative landscape plan foster non vehuvlar Access? Not 4o&cabk. 12. Explain the whether and the extent to which the alternative landscape plan demonstrates Innovative design and use of plant materials and other landscape dements? The intmdactioa of ontamaotal tnu ads vasriely and takes/ to tba rimtrcope with rmalkr tmr, dtPsnt texbins and. priu8 adore Onvamenlr are used at enhies and inttrrartion tbmugbout tbepTed matimg the intended theme. I would like your consideration of our request for an Alternative Compliance for Section 3.2.10). If you have any questions or comments, please feel five to call me anytime. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sinelt, Tim A. Dunn American Society of Landscape Architects From: Tim Dwm To: Troy Date: 11/9/2001 Time: 8:30:40 AM Page 2 of 3 TIM DUNN & ASSOCIATES 6948 DAVENTRY PLACE CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO 80104 PH:(303) 814-7778 FAX:(303) 814-7779 October 31, 2001 Mr. Troy W. Jones City Planner City of Fort Collins 281 North College Avenue P.O. Boa 580 Fox Collins, Colorado 80522-0580 RE: Rigden Farm, Th Filing, The Willows Dear Troy, Per our conversation yesterday. I am writing this letter to apply for an Alternative Compliance as outlined in Section 3.2.1 (N) of the City of Fort Collins Landscaping and Tree Protection section. It is our intent to frilly comply with all standards set forth by the section aforementioned with only one exception. The constraints set for by the site utilities and light pole locations limit us as the number and location of canopy trees we can fit along the stteetscape. Our solution is to add the use of ornamental trees which can be planted closer to light poles and will let us actually exceed the number of requited street trees set forth by the City. The use of ornamental trees provides visual interest, colors and breaks up the canopy trees and seems to be a good solution for a diverse and interesting streetscape. Standard Questions and Answers for Alternative Compliance i How does the proposed alternative landscape plan ensure significant canopy shading to reduce glare and heat build up equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standards? The Iawdic4e Plan aarally onedr the amwber of me ngxind with the we of omamental tne, So the o ffvm a ofgfine and beat bwU* it iwigafimi. 2. How does the proposed alternative landscape plan contribute to visual quality and continuity within and and between developments equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standards? Not appicabk. 1 How does the proposed alternative landscape plan provide screening and mitigation of potential conflicts between activity areas and site elements equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standards? Not gpfitabk 4. How does the alternative landscape plan enhance the outdoor spaces equally well or better than a plan which complies with the standards? The madoer.pacer wowld begreatly enbmad by the spring colon, fall m1m, size and textwret of the orsa wwal tree. S. Haw does the proposed alternative landscape plan reduce erosion and stormwater runoff Equally well or better than a plan which complies with the standards? Not appkcabk.