Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM, 9TH FILING, PARKSIDE COMMONS - FDP - 56-98V - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSCd�Y72@@P@ urban design, inc. Construction of storm line ST-2 should be coordinated between this developer and the Rigden Farms overall developer in order to make sure that the lines are compatible. It might be a good ides to have one contractor build the line all the way from the proposed inlet on Kansas to the Rigden Farms storm line on Drake. Please provide a detail for how the existing sewer in Limon Drive will be modified to add the manhole and the incoming 18" RCP. Call out collared joints at the proposed stom manhole. Show approximate limits of street cut on the utility plan. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: General Number:132 Created_:9/22/2003 No further comments. So noted. Thank you. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number:133 Created:9/23/2003 Correct the sanitary sewer profiles to correctly station proposed services. Include sanitary sewer service inverts which enter manholes on the profile. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. So noted. Thank you. Topic: Landscape Number: 23 Created, 5/12/2003 As previously indicated, include a.note to maintain a 4 feet minimum separation between shrubs and all water/sewer lines. Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distances on the landscape plans. The landscape note describing landscape and utility separations has been amended per a meeting between Joe Carter of Cityscape Urban Design and Jeff Hill on October 2nd 2003. Topic: Utility plans Number; 16 Created: 5/12/2003 9/23/03 All existing stubs must be used or abandoned at the mains. Clearly define all abandonments on these plans. Please refer to. the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Redlines. Thank Cityscape Urban Design Page 4 COn@@ o urban design, inc. Number:136 Created:9/24/2003 ADDRESS NUMERALS: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable). 1997 UFC 901.4.4 A. In Multi -family buildings more then one floor shall abide by the following requirements. 1. The first floor units shall be designated with 100's. 2. The second floor units with 200's 3. The third floor units with 300's, and so forth. B. All brass letters and numerals shall be posted on a black background. C. Some multi -family layouts may require address postings from the back side as well as the front of the buildings. D. A counter clock addressing pattern shall be maintained when ever possible. E. An addressing scheme shall be submitted to the fire department for approval prior to being posted on the building. So noted. Thank you. Buildings have been relabeled to reflect a counter -clock addressing scheme. A minimum of 6-inch high address numerals will be placed against a contrasting background for building addresses. Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Details Number:135 Created:9/24/2003 Please provide a City of Fort Collins standard metal sidewalk chase detail. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Topic: Drainage Plan Number:27 Created:5/12/2003 9/23/2003 The hydrology summary table should only have some of the information provided, it should have basin numbers, basin areas, basin runoff coefficients, design points, 2-year flows, 10-year flows and 100-year flows. All additional information is extraneous and makes the table harder to decipher. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Topic: ST-2 Alignment Number:134 Created: 9/23/2003 ST-2 is currently designed to go in the Kansas Drive right of way, between the curb line and the sidewalk. That would put it in conflict with any future trees in the parkway strip and potentially with electric lines. Please move the line such that it is in the Kansas Drive right of way, since there seems to be ample room in that area. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Topic: Utility plans Number:25 Created:5/12/2003 9/23/2003 The outfall of the northern portion this site is dependent on the construction of the outfall storm sewer to be built by the overall Rigden Farms developer in accordance with the Drake/Ziegler.plans. Please specify which lines will be built by this project and which one will be done "by others" on the utility plans. What happens if the ones to be built "by others" are not built at the time this project goes to construction ? This development is dependent on the Rigden Farms 6th Filing obtaining all necessary easements and having the Drake Road storm sewer built ahead of the construction of drainage facilities associated with this development. Page 3 Citysp urban design, inc. . Number:126 Created:7/30/2003 1 have shown the anticipated street cut limits on the plans. This was reviewed with Engineering Inspection. What I have shown is the minimum amount of patching that will be required for the street cuts and curb and gutter work. Please show these on your site plan so the contractor has an idea of what the limits of the repairs will be. 9/22/03 One needs to be extended from what is shown due to where the waterline is in the street. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Number:137 Created:9/25/2003 Need to. information for development agreement sheet filed out. Please see attached sheet for the required information. Topic: Kansas Design Number:85 Created:5/20/2003 Provide intersection elevations in accordance with detail 7-27. Missing elevations and need to provide the transition elevation and identify its location. 7/22/03 Need to provide the transition elevations and identify the location from the flowline of the pan. The elevation that is provided at the southend of Kansas that may have intended to be the transition elevation doesn't work as the transition elevation. The transition elevation is the location where the street starts its transitions from its standard crowned configuration. At this point the slope on the west side of the street is 0%. This is okay as long as this is within the area transitioning from the crown to the pan (at some point you will have 0 x-slope but vertical slope to keep the water from ponding). 9/22/03 Need to look at the transition points that are provided. At the south end of the street the cross section of the street reaches and even exceeds the maximum x-slope before the transition elevation is reached. At the north end of the street the elevations in the street didn't quite match that shown on the profile. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Number:127 Created:7/30/2003 Just doing a quick calculation it looks like the minimum x-slope is not being met on the east side of the street at the high point (' station 12+86). If it is not the design needs to be adjusted so that the x-slopes are within the required ranges for new streets. 9/22/03 the section above is within range - but one of the x-sections probvided is not though. One of the sections provided exceeds the 3% maximum although you had indicated that the cross slope was 3 %. The profiles need to be adjusted so that the cross slopes are within parameters. The other cross slope provided is within parameters, but is not the 2% indicated. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Number:138 Created:9/25/2003 Have several places where items on the plan and profiles do not match or are not shown correctly. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Topic: Plat Number:67 Created:5/20/2003 More than likely when the row stub is vacated the whole area will be retained as an easement. If the entire area is retained as an easement then this plat will need to vacate the area with in the building envelope. 7/22/03 Still maybe true -need to see what the utilities want. . 9/22/03 The Ordinance to vacate the row and retain it as a utility easement is Ordinance No. 131, 2003. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Department: PFA Topic: Addressing Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Page 2 November 17, 2003 CMY' a[P@ Troy Jones r�Jl LJ�J City of Fort Collins urban design, inc. Current Planning Department 3555 stanford road, suite 105 281 North College Avenue fort collins, colorado 80525 Fort Collins, CO 80522 (970) 226-4074 fax (970) 226-4196 e@cityscapeud.com RE: Rigden Farm, 9th Filing, Parkside Commons — Final Compliance Plan Comments and Responses Dear Troy: Included below are the comments received from City Staff regarding on Rigden Farm, 91h Filing, Parkside Commons. An explanation (in italics) of how issues have been addressed follows each comment. ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Troy Jones Topic: General Number:139 Created:9/26/2003 Take the City Clerk signature line off the plat. The City Clerk does not sign a plat. Be sure that when we are ready for mylars, you bring in the those mylars with owner, lien holder, and attorney's signatures on them where necessary. The cover sheet of the site plan also needs an owner's certification signature block. Let me know if you need me to fax you an example of this. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses for the plat. The signature block on the cover sheet of the site plan has been amended to include notarization. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri. Wamhoff Topic: General Number:46 Created:5/20/2003 Need to identify how and where the curb and gutter on the on site driveways end, as the driveway cuts within the row do not have a curb. Concentrated flow is not allowed out of the driveways, thus from the highpoint in the driveway there is to be no curb and gutter, just a concrete or asphalt edge so sheet flow occurs. (See next comment regarding the amount of flow allowed out a driveway) 7/22103 The drainage has been fixed, but still need to identify where the curb and gutter ends. The driveway cuts do not have curb and gutter need to indicate that the on -site curb and gutter ends at the high point. From that point it can just be a asphalt edge or a concrete edge if desired. Also need to identify the driveway widths. 9/22/03 Have identified that the curb and gutter ends - but it needs to end at the high point in the driveway not the right- of-way line. Please refer to the Civil Engineer's comment responses. Number:51 Created:5/20/2003 This site is dependent on Drake Road improvements occurring before work can occur on this site. If for some reason the Drake Road work is not proceeding and this project is ready to build then it will need to incorporate the needed improvements (stone sewer ad water line) into this plan set and build them. 7/22/03 Drake road plans are not yet approved. 91/22/03 Drake Road plans have still not been approved. So noted. Thank you. Number:94 Created:5/20/2003 See additional comments on the plans. So noted.. Thank you. Page 1