HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIGDEN FARM, 9TH FILING, PARKSIDE COMMONS - PDP - 56-98T - DECISION - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISIONf) ol-eL."
PG rkSS 2
TAJ P_,#_
9,+L, Fi I i , ,
cowl w%.01^ S
$/=/z-,o 0-5
So%Ae g ZY> ( N � ('oil¢ ��• � Calll�g
'SPeuLce,r Sw6i4 ,
75�8 t..�t..Eirs �1.1 • .7 fir. G
— F 1-7_611ih5
In" u1/e 6sc/,/O /j / a�� ��deu raL� tosarl
Rigden Farm Filing 9, Parkside Commons
Type 1 Administrative Hearing
8
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
After reviewing the staff report and the record of the public hearing, the Hearing
Officer makes the following findings and conclusions:
A. The proposed project development plan of Rigden Farm, Filing 9,
Parkside Commons P.D.P. contains a permitted use in the MMN —
Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood District.
B. The proposed project development plan of Rigden Farm, Filing 9,
Parkside Commons P.D.P. complies with the applicable district standards
contained in Section 4.5 of the Land Use Code.
C. The proposed project development plan of Rigden Farm, Filing 9,
Parkside Commons P.D.P. complies with all applicable General
Development Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land Use Code.
DECISION
Based on the findings and conclusions, the request to construct 71 multi -family
dwelling units in 11 buildings, as shown on the Rigden Farm, Filing 9, Parkside
Commons P.D.P plans presented to the Hearing Officer on August 20, 2003 is
approved with the following conditions:
The "minimum parking provided" data on Sheet C1 must be revised to
reflect that the "total vehicles" is 126. This revision must appear on the
Final Plan.
2. Additional handicap parking spaces may be required in order to comply
with Building Code accessibility requirements. If that is the case, a minor
amendment will be required to reflect any parking changes.
3. The Limon Drive right-of-way vacation discussed at the August 20, 2003
hearing must be approved.
Dated this 25th day of August, 2003, per authority granted by Sections 1.4.9(E)
and 2.1 of the Land Use Code.
,9
-J . r5 0_,U�
Peter Barnes
Zoning Administrator
Rigden Farm Filing 9, FdiKside Commons
Type 1 Administrative Hearing
7
4. Site Lighting [3.2.4] — Light fixtures are proposed to be down
directional and cut-off lighting fixtures. As required, the lighting levels
will not exceed 10 foot-candles on site, and the walkways will be
illuminated at least 0.5 foot-candles.
B. Division 3.3, Engineering Standards
Plat Standards [3.3.1] — As required, the general layout of the lots,
roads, driveways, utilities, drainage facilities, and other services within
the proposed development are designed in a way that enhances an
interconnected street system within and between neighborhoods.
Proper right-of-way has been dedicated for public streets, emergency
access easements, and utility easements have been provided as
needed to serve the area being platted.
2. Water Hazards [3.3.3] — The Stormwater Department has reviewed the
application and has indicated that the application satisfies the
requirements of this standard.
C. Division, Building Standards [3.5]
1. Building and Project Compatibility [3.5.1] — The architectural character
is consistent and compatible with the architectural character that has
been established in the neighborhood Rigden Farm neighborhood.
Main entrances face connecting walkways and street sidewalks.
2. Residential Building Standards [3.5.2] - Every front fagade with a
primary entrance to a dwelling unit faces either and adjacent street
sidewalk or a connecting walkway within 200 feet of a street sidewalk.
Garage doors do not face the street. There is no minimum front
setback in the MMN zone. This standard is therefore satisfied.
D. Division 3.6, Transportation and Circulation
1. Master Street Plan [3.6.1]—Rigden Parkway is considered a Minor 2-
lane arterial on the Master Street Plan. The proposed project has
been designed consistent with this designation.
2. Streets, Streetscapes, Alleys and Easements [3.6.2] — This section of
the code requires that connections of a private drive with a public
street shall be made with a driveway cut using the detail titled, "New
Driveway Approach" in accordance with City Engineering standards.
The project complies with this standard.
Rigden Farm Filing 9, Parkside Commons
Type 1 Administrative Hearing
6
a. Direct On -Site Access to Pedestrian and Bicycle
Destinations [3.2.2(C)(6)] — Direct sidewalk connections
are provided from the on -site dwellings to on -site parking
and yard areas, thereby satisfying this standard.
b. Off -Site Access to Pedestrian and Bicycle Destinations
[3.2.2(C)(7)] — The on -site pedestrian/bicycle network
connects directly to the street sidewalks and on -street
bicycle paths. This standard is therefore satisfied.
c. Transportation Impact Study [3.2.2(C)(8)] —The City's
Traffic Engineer and the Transportation Planning
Department have reviewed the applicants Traffic Impact
Study and have found that it meets the required
vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit Level of
Service requirements.
d. Access and Parking Lot Requirements [3.2.2(D)] —
Pedestrian areas are clearly differentiated from vehicular
areas. All off-street parking spaces have unobstructed
vehicular access to and from the public streets. Off-
street guest parking is distributed proportionally to
dwelling unit locations that they are intended to serve.
This standard is therefore satisfied.
e. Parking Lots: Required Number of Spaces for Type of
Use [3.2.2(K)] —The code requires 1.75 off-street parking
spaces for each 2-bedroom unit, and 2.0 off-street
parking spaces for each 3-bedroom unit, therefore
requiring 126. The proposed plan provides 76 garage
spaces, and 50 surface spaces for a total of 126 off-
street parking spaces. This standard is therefore
satisfied.
f. Handicap Parking [3.2.2(K)(4)] — There are 2 handicap
spaces required and 2 provided. The standard is thereby
satisfied.
3. Solar Access, Orientation, Shading [3.2.3] — The layout of the project
does not cast unreasonable shadows within the site or on adjacent
properties so as not to impair the access to sunshine for potential solar
energy systems or for solar -oriented rooftop surfaces. This standard is
therefore satisfied.
Rigden Farm Filing 9, Parkside Commons
Type 1 Administrative Hearing
5
2. Block Size [4.5(E)(1)(b)] — As required, the block is not larger than
7 acres in size.
3. Minimum Building Frontage [4.5(E)(1)(c)] — As required, at least 50
percent of all block faces consist of building frontage, plazas or
other functional open space within the project.
4. Building Height [4.5(E)(1)(d)] —As required, proposed buildings do
not exceed 3 stories in height.
4. Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development Standards
The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable General
Development Standards as follows:
A. Division 3.2, Site Planning and Design Standards
1. Landscaping and Tree Protection [3.2.1]
a. Street Trees [3.2.1(D)(2)] — As required, the proposed
PDP provides street trees within the landscaped parkway
between the curb and the street sidewalk at 30 to 40 foot
spacing intervals.
b. Minimum Species Diversity [3.2.1(D)(3)] — The applicant
proposes 122 trees. No more than 15% of the trees can
be a single species. The project would be allowed to
have up to 18 trees of a single species. The landscape
plan proposes no more than 18 trees of a single species,
therefore the PDP satisfies this standard.
c. Parking Lot Perimeter Landscaping [3.2.1(E)(4)] - As
required, the proposed outdoor parking areas are
screened adequately from the street and adjacent
residential uses with plant material of sufficient opacity to
block the required amount of vehicle headlights.
d. Parking Lot Interior Landscaping [3.2.1(E)(5)] —As
required, at least 6% of the interior area of all parking lots
containing 6 or more spaces are landscaped areas.
2. Access, Circulation and Parking [3.2.2]
Rigden Farm Filing 9, ParKside Commons
Type 1 Administrative Hearing
4
property to MMN was approved on 2nd reading by City Council on January 5,
1999.
2. Compliance with the Overall Development Plan
The Rigden Farm Overall Development Plan was approved on April 15,
1999. This 6.36 acre Project Development Plan is part of a 15.80 acre
parcel identified on the ODP as "parcel C." The proposed use and density
are both consistent with the use and density specified on the ODP. Parcel
C was identified to consist of at least 185 but no more than 395 multi-
family and/or single family dwelling units. This is the first proposed
development within the land identified as parcel C on the ODP.
3. Division 4.5 of the Land Use Code, Medium Density Mixed -Use
Neighborhood Zone District
The proposed land use of "multifamily dwellings" is permitted in the MMN
— Medium Density, Mixed -Use Neighborhood zone district.
A. The PDP meets the applicable Land Use Standards [4.5(D)] as follows:
1. Density [4.5(D)(1)] — Within the P.D.P., there are 71 dwelling units
proposed on 5.74 net acres of residential land, making the
development density 12.36 dwelling units per net acre. This
satisfies the overall minimum average density required within the
MMN zone district, which is 12 units per net acre.
2. Mix of Housing [4.5(D)(2)] — Because the MMN portion of the
P.D.P. contains less than 16 gross acres of residential land, one
housing types is required, therefore the proposed "multifamily
dwellings" satisfy this satisfied.
3. Access to a park, central feature, or gathering place [4.5(D)(3)] — At
least 90 percent of the dwelling units proposed are required to be
located within 1,320 feet of a private park or other central gathering
space a minimum of 10,000 square feet in size. The site is
adjacent to a proposed charter school, which will have publicly
accessible gathering spaces in excess of 10,00 square feet,
thereby satisfying this standard.
B. The PDP meets the applicable Development Standards [4.4(E)] as
follows:
1. Block Structure [4.5(E)(1)(a)] — As required, the site is part of a
street network of complete blocks bounded by streets.
Rigden Farm Filing 9, Parkside Commons
Type 1 Administrative Hearing
3
Written Comments:
None
Community Concerns:
Mr. Glaser asked how the project was complying with the open space
requirements.
City Response:
Mr. Jones explained that the proposed charter school adjacent to this
project will have publicly accessible gathering spaces in excess of 10,000
square feet, thereby satisfying this standard.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed land use is permitted in the MMN — Medium Density, Mixed -Use
Neighborhood zone district. The proposed land use and density is consistent
with the Rigden Farm Overall Development Plan. The Project Development Plan
complies with all applicable district standards of Section 4.5 of the Land Use
Code, MMN zone district. The Project Development Plan complies with all
applicable General Development Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land
Use Code.
Background
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: T — Drake Road, Cargil Research Farm, historic barn, farm land,
E: LMN — Existing Parkside East and Parkside West Developments (6-plex
condo buildings approved in filings 3, and 4 of Rigden Farm), existing
single family detached housing (approved in filing 1 of Rigden Farm).
SE: LMN — Approved 2Id filing of Rigden Farm (single family attached housing
under construction),a neighborhood center including relocated Johnson
Farm structures,
S: MMN — proposed charter school (under review),
W: MMN & NC — undeveloped phases of the Rigden Farm Development,
proposed grocery store anchored shopping center (under review).
The property was annexed in November 1997 as part of the Timberline
Annexation and was originally zoned T — Transition. A request to rezone the
Rigden Farm Filing 9, Parkside Commons
Type 1 Administrative Hearing
I
ZONING DISTRICT: MMN — Medium Density Mixed Use
Neighborhood
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice of public hearing was made on July 28,
2003 by mailing to property owners within 500
feet of the subject property.
The public hearing was advertised in the
Coloradoan on August 10, 2003.
PUBLIC HEARING
After reviewing the Staff Report and recommendation, a public hearing was held
on the subject application at 4:00 PM on August 20, 2003. The hearing was held
in Conference Rooms C and D at 281 North College, Fort Collins, Colorado.
HEARING TESTIMONY, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER EVIDENCE:
The following is a list of those who attended the meeting:
From the City:
Troy Jones, City Planner
Sheri Wamhoff, City Engineering Department
From the applicant. -
Keith Sheaffer
Spencer Smith
Dan Worden
Joe Carter
From the Community:
Carl Glaser
Michelle Leschinsky
City of Fort Collins
Comma Ay Planning and Environmenta. •rvices
Current Planning
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
TYPE I ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
HEARING OFFICER:
PROJECT NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Peter Barnes
Zoning Administrator
Rigden Farm, Filing 9, Parkside Commons
P.D.P.
56-98T
Joe Carter
Cityscape Urban Design
3555 Stanford Road
Fort Collins, CO 80525
The applicant proposes 71 units (66 two -bedroom, and 5 three -bedroom
multifamily dwelling units) on 6.36 acres in the Rigden Farm development,
located west of Rockford Drive, south of Drake Road, east of Kansas Drive, and
north of Limon Drive. The applicant intends for the units to be condominiums that
are individually sold. The property is in the MMN — Medium Density Mixed Use
Neighborhood zone district.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
HEARING OFFICER DECISION: Approval with conditions
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020