HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRAILHEAD - FDP - 43-02B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - REVISIONSSTAFF PROJECT. REVIEW
Citfof Fort Collins
City of Fort Collins 9/15/04
Mr. Bob Barkeen
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
JR Engineering has addressed your comments for TRAILHEAD PDP - TYPE I (LUC), and
we offer the following responses:
ISSUES:
The actual fence design will need to meet the requirements of Section 3.8.11 of the LUC
Wsponse: The fencing on the rear Cot fines along Greenfierds Orive meets the Code. r1he offset is 8 feet. The fence
type most Ckefy wi(f6e either the five- foot or six- foot high typicaffence. In addition to articulating the rear Cot
fines, we have also incorporatedshrubs in sections to heCp soften the lookandprovide visuaCinterest.
Parking lot screening will need to be provided or the day care parking lot (along Yule Trail
Drive). Street trees are also missing from the day care, swimming pool detail sheet.
Response: We have addedadditionafshru6s at the Tufe 7radafriveway entrance. Street trees are shown on Sheet 3
of 8.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: East Vine Drive Interim
Number: 213 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/27/041 [5/20/041 See redlines for other comments.
Wrsponse: Addressed alf redines
Number: 269 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] Add the street cut note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be
determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance
with City street repair standards.
Response: Added note Number 6. 4Zeads as stated above.
Topic: East Vine Drive Ultimate
Number: 211 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/27/04] [5/20/04] Please see comments under the Trailhead plans where applicable.
Response: Reviewed1raififeadPlansandcoordinatedallsets.
Page 1
City of Fort -Collins
Mr. Bob Barkeen
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
September 15, 2004
Mr. Barkeen:
J•R ENGINEERING
A Westrian Company
JR Engineering has addressed all comments and has prepared final compliance plan sets
of Overall Utility Plans for Trail Head, Vine Drive and Greenfields Drive Improvements.
We thank you for working so cooperatively with our clients Trail Head Partners LLC and
JR Engineering.
We trust that you'll find these plans suitable for construction and appreciate your
willingness to check them accordingly. If there are any outstanding issues with the
engineering or coordination for this project, please contact me at your earliest
convenience. Replies to comments follow.
Warm regards,
'!,O�dTimothy J.
Cc: file
2620 Fast Prospect Road, Suite 190, Fort Collins, CO 80525
970-491-9888 • Fax: 970-491-9984 • wJrengineeringxotn f�
Number: 254 Created: 8/27/2004
Please provide cover for the storm sewer which is shown above ground on the profiles. See
redlined plan.
Response: Cover has 6een provided
Number: 255 Created: 8/27/2004
Please provide a trash rack detail with a maximum of 5 inch spacing between bars. Cross
bars are recommended as well for child safety. Trash rack should be safe to walk on.
Response: Trash rackdetaif Etas been provided Refer to Sheet 96.
Number: 256 Created: 8/27/2004
There are some inlet and storm pipe conflicts with trees throughout the site. See redlined
landscape plan. Please provide 10 feet separation between drainage structures and all
trees.
Response: Conjlicts resolved, see revnsedfandscape plan.
Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control
Number: 257 Created: 8/27/2004
1. The report is very general; it should describe in more detail what BMP's will be utilized
where in which phase of construction. The plan contains phasing plan sheets, the report ant
plans should address erosion control for these phases with individual plans for each phase if
they are to be done separately.
Response: Erosion controfeffectiveness, rain faffperformance calculations anda construction: sequence (Standard
Eonn C) are provided in AppendiXG..4fferosion control nneasures sf:aff be installedper the construction sequence
andshaffremain untdalfconstruction is compfetedforeach phase.
2. The report states that calculations, etc are to be found in Appendix H. I did not find this
information there. The title page to Appendix G says Erosion Control, but the appendix
contains rip rap calculations. I declined to look through the rest of the volume to try to locate
the calculations required.
12espoarse: The report •was corrected to read `�AppeitdiX, G". Cafcu(atior:s are inci nded in appendix G.
3. Please provide a project schedule detailing what BMP's are to be utilized in what
phases of construction (grading, concrete installation, etc.). Use Month 1, 2, 3, etc., not
specific months (Apr Mar, Jun).
Response: A construction sequence (Standard Form C) is provided in ,7ppendk G.
Page 16
Number: 238 Created: 8/24/2004
[8/24/04] Sheet 83 of Utility Plans: Wagon Trail/Campfire - please add a ramp on NW
corner that facilitates a complete a-w crossing of Campfire.
Response: Added
Number: 239 Created: 8/24/2004
[8/24/04] Sheet 81 of Utility Plans: Ultimate Vine/Greenfields - please add a ramp on NE
corner that directs pedestrians south across Vine to the refuge provided in the median.
Response: Added.
We have returned all redlines.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 491-9888.
Warm Regards,
;Z' �y"'��1j
Timothy J'Halopotf,�
Project Engineer
JR Engineering
Page 18
4 o - 1
4. Some of the symbols for BMP's on the plan are not consistent on the plan or with the
legend. Please correct.
Response: Sym6ols in the Legend Piave been corrected to match the plan.
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 228 Created: 5/26/2004
[8/27/04]
Please provide an off -site drainage easement for the outlet pipe for Pond A located at the
southwest corner of the site. This easement needs to be 20 feet wide with the pipe centered
in the easement.
Response: Off -site drainage easement has been proended Please refer to report for copy (Reception #2004-0072260)
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill
Topic: Transportation
Number: 237 Created: 8/24/2004
[8/24/04] There are numerous crosswalk ramps that lead to nowhere - meaning there isn't a
ramp across the roadway to provide a full crossing. A few that I've spotted so far are:
Sheet 90 of Utility Plans: Campfire at Vine, east side of Campfire - remove the ramp that
directs pedestrians to the south (across Vine). There is no opposite ramp.
Sheet 90 of Utility Plans: approx. 200' north of Vine, east side of Campfire - remove
crosswalk ramp directing pedestrians to the west side of the street. This is an incomplete
mid -block crossing.
Sheet 90 of Utility Plans: just north of Bear River Ct. and Campfire. Remove the crosswalk
ramp (see also sheet 83).
Sheet 91 of Utility Plans: at Switchback and Camfire - remove N. crosswalk ramp on east
side of Campfire.
Sheet 91 of Utility Plans: Campfire/Greenfields - remove southern crosswalk ramp directing
pedestrians to the west side of Greenfields (see also sheet 82).
Sheet 81 of Utility Plans: Ultimate Vine/Three Forks - remove ramp to s. on east side of
Three Forks. It leads to nowhere.
Sheet 81 of Utility Plans: Ultimate Vine/Wagon Trail - remove ramp to s on east side of
Wagon Trail. It leads to nowhere.
Sheet 83 of Utility Plans: Wagon Trail/Campfire -
Response: Ramps have been coordinatedwith comments.
Page 17
-.,
Number: 248 Created: 8/27/2004
Please provide a buried riprap detail.
Response: Buried riprap detail has been provided 4'lease refer to Sheet 94.
Number: 249 Created: 8/27/2004
Please have storm sewer outlets at or near the toe -of -slope of the detention ponds. This
reduces the risk of erosion even if riprap is provided.
Response: Comment noted Outlets are in correct location. Erosion is reduced via riprap.
Number: 250 Created: 8/27/2004
Please note a few storm sewer alignment concerns on the redlines. Additional clearance is
needed in a few locations to allow for maintenance and/or replacement in the future.
Response: Storm sewer alignments have been corrected to provide additional clearance.
Number: 251 Created: 8/27/2004
Please provide a detention pond summary table on the drainage plan for the 2 ponds
including volume req., volume provided, 100-year HWL, WQ water line, and WQ vol.
provided.
Response: A detention pondsummary table has been includedandis locatedon Sheet 49.
Number: 252 Created: 8/27/2004
Please show that the ground water is below any storm sewer or provide water tight joints for
all storm sewers within the groundwater.
Response: Tie groundwater is below any storm sewer as shown in the soils report.
Number: 253 Created: 8/27/2004
Please provide a tract for the storm sewer located at the northwest part of the site that is
located in an easement on two lots. See redlines.
Response: Tract has been provided
Page 15
-•.
Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Drainage
Number: 242 Created: 8/27/2004
Please revise the basin widths in the SWMM model as per phone discussion and revise
detention pond volume per model's new calculations.
Response: STl' 9V basin widths and pondvolumes have been revised
Number: 243 Created: 8/27/2004
Please provide drainage easements on the lots where flows from upstream lots pas through.
These drainage easements can be center on the lot line and need to be 10 feet wide as a
minimum.
Response: Drainage easements have been provided
Number: 244 Created: 8/27/2004
A reminder that the irrigation easement needs to be abandoned and all off -site easements
signed before mylar signing.
Response: Comment noted
Number: 245 Created: 8/27/2004
Due to 3:1 slopes along the swale in the Waterglen development, a maintenance agreement
will need to be included in the development agreement as well as the future HOA
covenants.
Response: Comment noted
Number: 246 Created: 8/27/2004
Please provide a plan view for all the lot grading templates (Type A, B, G, W) to better clarify
typical lot grading.
Response: (Plan views have been provided
Number: 247 Created: 8/27/2004
Please provide typical alley cross -sections for all the different types of alleys on the plans.
This is needed for drainage purposes to ensure the alley is built per the flow calcs in the
drainage report. The width of the flow needs to be contained within the alley or drainage
easements would be required for the lots where the flow encroaches, however no more than
3 lots can be affected in a row.
Response: 7ypicalalley cross -sections have been pro videdfor alleys. qTie width of the flow is contained within the
alley; therefore, no drainage easement is required (Please refer to calculations in drainage report.
Page 14
Number: 15 Created: 1 /5/2004
[8/25/04]
Sprinkers: Fire sprinklers may be required. When any portion of the facility or any portion of
an exterior wall off the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire
apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or
facility, it shall be fire sprinklered. Note: Buildings that are fire sprinklered shall have a
minimum 6-inch fireline unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fireline. 1997
UFC 902.2.1
Response: ,91'oted his requirement doesn't seem to apply to our submittal.
Number: 16 Created: 1 /5/2004
[8/25/041
Fire Alarm: A fire alarm system may be required for the day care center.
[response: Woted qTtankyou.
Number: 17 Created: 1 /5/2004
[8/25/04]
Knox Box: Poudre Fire Authority requires a Knox Box to be mounted on the front of every
new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 1997 UFC
902.4; PFA Policy 88-20
Response: Noted. Tiank 2'ou.
Number: 18 Created: 1 /5/2004
[8/25/04]
Hazardous Materials: This comment pertains to the club house and swimming pool.
Corrosive, flammable, reactive or toxic materials (as defined in the Uniform Fire Code), if
used, stored or handled on site, must have a Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis (HMIA)
completed and supplied to the fire department and Planning Department. FCLUC 3.4.5 (C)
Response: Woted wank Tou.
Department: Police
Topic: General
Number: 234
[8/24/04] Issues resolved.
Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom
Created: 8/24/2004
Page 13
Number: 11 Created: 1 /5/2004
[1/5/04] Water Supply/Commercial: No commercial buildings can be greater than 300 feet
from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an
approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1,500 gallons per minute at
a residual pressure of 20 psi. If a fire hydrant cannot be provided, fire sprinklers shall be
required. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2
[2esponse: _Arrstructures seem to meet this criteria andr:ydrants have been Cocatedivitkin the maximum spacing
envelopes.
Number: 12 Created: 1 /5/2004
[8/25/04]
Water Supply/Residential (Outside GMA): No residential buildings can be greater than 400
feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 800 feet
along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 500 gallons per
minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. If a fire hydrant cannot be provided, fire sprinklers
shall be required. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2
Response: We felt that we have conformed to this requirement. If you find t hat ive haven't, prease point out
where and we zvilrgladly fi:c problem.
Number: 13 Created: 1 /5/2004
[8/25/04]
Fire Lane: A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and
be maintained unobstructed. The fire lane shall be platted as an "Emergency Access
Easement" on the final plat. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1; FCLUC
Response: We do not know where afire cane is needed Please adtnse as to specific location.
Number: 14 Created: 1 /5/2004
(8/25104]
Aerial Access: Buildings three or more stories in height must have access to a 30-foot
unobstructed access roadway on at least one side for aerial operations. Note: Please submit
proposed elevations (number of stories) for multi -family dwellings. PFA Policy 85-5 (B)
Response: We have no 6uirding higher than 2 stories.
Page 12
Number: 232 Created: 8/19/2004
[8/19/04] The existing vaults along Vine Drive will need to be relocated prior to the Interim
Vine Road Improvements. A new electric circuit will need to be constructed along Vine
before the existing equipment can be removed. New vaults will need to be installed at each
entrance road to the subdivision. These vaults will need to be placed far enough north to
avoid any future elevation changes due to the final Vine Road Improvements. Final grading
at each road entrance and horizontal and vertical control will be required. System
modification charges will apply.
Response: Owner has been made aware of this issue and has agreed to resofve issue in tDevefopmentAgreement.
Number: 233 Created: 8/19/2004
[8/19/04] The proposed bridge crossing at the north end of the project will need to
accommodate electric conduit as part of the bridge design. Please coordinate with Light &
Power.
Response: Efectricaf and other conduit has been provided with direction from City.
Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Topic: General
Number: 241 Created: 8/25/2004
[8/25/04] No issues.
Response: Noted gfiank.Tau.
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez
Topic: General
Number: 9 Created: 1 /5/2004
[1/5/04] .Streets: Street names shall be verified and reviewed by the City Planning
Department prior to being put in service. Note: Several street names are in question.
Response: 9Moted rIfiankTou.
Number: 10
Created: 1 /5/2004
[1/5/04] Addressing: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property,
and posted with a minimum 6-inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze
numerals on brown brick are not acceptable.) Multi -family buildings more than one floor in
height shall abide by the following addressing requirements: First -floor units shall be
designated with 100's, second -floor units with 200's, third -floor units with 300's, and so on.
Some multi -family layouts may require address postings from the back side as well as the
front side of buildings. A clockwise addressing pattern shall be maintained whenever
possible. Note: An addressing scheme shall be submitted to the fire department for approval
prior to being posted on the buildings. UFC 901.4.5; 901.4.4
Response: Noted gfiankyou.
Page 11
Number: 203 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/24/041 Information still missing.
[5/20/04] Please provide curb return, inlet, and station equations on the street profiles. Also
show the underpass, gas lines, etc where applicable.
Response: Street 2rofiles and Plans have been updatedandallredfines addressed.
Number: 220 Created: 5/25/2004
[8/24/04] Information on the existing line is not shown on the plans.
[5/25/04] A portion of the waterline in Vine Drive may need to be lowered so that the
connections coming in from the local streets are at the ultimate location.
Response: Issued addressed in profile.
Number: 267 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] Lets get together the week of 8/30-9/3 to talk about the redlines and make sure
we're all on the same page. I think we could go through the comments a lot faster just going
through the plans real quick than to try type them all out. The plans overall are fantastic -
we're just down to the last minute details. I also wanted to talk about coordinating the
various sets (interim, ultimate, etc) and how to best do that. 1 have a suggestion but would
like to talk it over with you first.
Response: We have met and worked together to resolve all issues.
Number: 268 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] Please see the redlines and checklist E4 for additional comments. Please return
the redlined checklist for Trailhead Utility Plans only, I do not need the others back.
Response: Nave reineivedallredtines andrE.4 personally andfelt that comments have been thoroughly addressed
.ifave tried to contact Bob Zakely numerous times without a call backto express our view that there is no erosion
controlpl:asing needed.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz
Topic: General
Number: 231 Created: 8/19/2004
[8/19/04]Along Vine Drive any area where there is a cut in road elevation above the existing
electric line must be potholed to determine the depth of the existing electric line. A 30"
minimum cover must be maintained over the electric line. Please add a note to reflect this
requirement.
1Response: Owner is aware of conditions and has agreed to resolve comments within the (Development,4greement.
Page 10
Number: 178 Created: 5/18/2004
[8/24/04] Some of the retaining walls have been removed, but still need details for the ones
now shown.
[5/18/04] No retaining walls are allowed within the utility easement. Please provide a
design and all necessary details, talcs for any and all walls over 30". Handrails (or fences)
are required for any wall over 30".
Response: 4Cf3 retaining wafts are focatedon the South portion of Campfire Dr. andafrwaffs are 30"or less.
Number: 190 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/24/04] There are still numerous problems with the reference labels and matchlines not
matching up.
[5/20/04] None of the match lines/sheet numbers match up on the street plan and profile
sheets.
,Response: Attempted to correct aff reference la6efs and matchfines.
Number: 196 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/24/04] [5/20/04) Sheet 15 - Refer to detail and sheet # for all FES. See redlines.
Response: Addressedredfinesandreferencedalfstorm structures.
Number: 198 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/24/04] A number of plan and profiles show conflicting or missing information.
[5/20/04] The information shown in the water/sewer/storm needs to match in both the plan
and profiles.
4Zesponse: Attempted to coordinate allpfan eT profiles.
Number: 200 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/24/04] Show the existing waterline in Vine and show how your line is tying into it.
[5/20/04] Sheet 25 - show how the proposed water line ties into the existing.
Kesponse: 7fave drown interim aZ ultimate connections on the only 12"or 8" fine that wiffneed to 6e changed
during urtimate.
Number: 201 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/24/04] [5/20/04] Grading sheets - missing spot elevations on some lot corners.
Response: 7fave added lot cornergrades.
Page 9
Topic: Utility
Number: 143 Created: 3/19/2004
[8/27/04] Great job cleaning these up. Still missing a few lot corner spots, see redlines.
[5/18/04] Repeat comment. In addition, spots must be provided at all lot corners (many are
missing).
[3/19/04] Grading sheets - these are unscannable in general and many spot elevations are
illegible. Please rotate all labeling to the reader.
Response: t4fredliuedlot cornergrades have been provided qTiankyou.
Number: 145 Created: 3/19/2004
[8/24/04] Please show the underpass in all applicable profiles and label as "future".
[5/20/04] Need to show the underpass in all profiles so that we can see how the utilities will
work with it and that you are meeting the minimum cover requirements for both the utilities
and the street.
[3/19/04] Sheet 57, 58 - Put the numbers in the key map by the corresponding drawing.
How will the storm design at Campfire and Vine work with the underpass?
Response: 'Underpass is shover: in ultimate vine Drive Prehininary Plan Set. Sheet 23 vvas added to show a Section
andpossibre drainage path. 'Underpass has been shown in Vine profiles.
Number: 176 Created: 5/18/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] Will need to show the street cuts into Vine for the utility connections.
Please add the street cut note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be
determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance
with City street repair standards.
Response: Comment added to interim Vine Drive plans.
Number: 177 Created: 5/18/2004
[8/24/04] Full design has not been completed. Will need this before approving the
development's mylars.
[5/18/04] As discussed at conceptual and the first round of review, this project is
responsible for the full design of the ditch crossing on the north side of the property as well
as contributing 1/2 their share of the costs of constructing it. All applicable notes, details,
and structural talcs must be provided in the plans. Please see Young's Creek and The
Lind Property for good example. An estimate will need to be prepared for the city's review
and approval once the design has been completed and that amount will go in the DA. This
project must also provide a complete design for the underpass at Vine with enough
information so that it can be built in the field. Please see Lind and Young's Creek blue lines
for good examples of the information that will need to be provided on the plans for the bridge
or culvert and the underpass.
Response: A fulr6ridge design has been provndedwith the Green fields offsite plans
Page 9
Number: 264 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] New policy effective immediately: All local intersections must be dedicated with
either a 15' inside radius or a 15' chamfered corner to accommodate the new directional
ramp design. All projects (even those currently in review) are affected. If the additional row
dedication makes your lot too small to meet the land use code, then you may dedicate the
additional area as a Public Access Easement.
Response: T'o change requiredon this plat per City approvarof a compara6re detail. See Susan _7oy.
Topic: Site
Number: 121 Created: 3/16/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] [3/16/04] See comments under General.
[response: We have cleaned up the overlapping fines and fa6els as requested.
Number: 132 Created: 3/18/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] Note placed on Plat. Still need note on Site Plan.
[3/18/04] Please place a note on the Plat and Site plan limiting the "alley" loaded lots to rear
access only and that no driveways allowed off the front.
Response: See note on Site Plan.
Number: 172 Created: 5/18/2004
[8/24/04] Much better but the cover sheet will not scan very well. Is there another option for
the shaded areas? Those usually don't scan at all or they come out as a blob. Sorry about
that!
[5/18/04] See Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. The cover sheet is illegible and will
not scan. Please remove grading for clarity. Remove the utilities from all sheets.
Response: Wehavef(edthecoverslreetandremovedsrradedareas- arsofilcedvicinitymap.
Number: 173
[8/24/04] Please label the retaining walls.
[5/18/04] Show and label all retaining walls.
Response: Labeled
Created: 5/18/2004
Page 7
Number: 133 Created: 3/19/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] [3/19/04] See redlines for other comments.
Response: Addressed.
Number: 189 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/24/04] All driveways must be shown for lots with 50' or less street frontage.
[5/20/04] Show all driveways. Do not shade them, just an outline is fine.
Response: Addressed
Number: 259 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close.
Number: 260 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] From Technical Services: Block boundaries must be delineated - show by
separate line type and w/metes & bounds to describe.
Response: Addressed
Number: 261 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04) From Technical Services: Reception numbers missing.
Response: See response to#65.
Number: 262 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] From Technical Services: This is a nice looking plat. Good line and text.
Response: wanks.
Number: 263 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04) From Technical Services: Plat is missing curve info. All curves must have 5
values shown.
Response: Addressed
Page 6
31
Number: 181 Created: 5/20/2004
[8/27/04] Repeat comment (this is just for the trees that would go inside the parkway. The
rest of the plantings on site may go in with your project).
[5/20/04] Place a note that all trees along Vine Drive will be installed with the Ultimate Vine
Drive Road Improvements.
Response: We fnav-e added notes to tfne fandscape plan - see Aant .Totes iWumbers 15 tfnroug6 18.
Topic: Plat
Number: 65 Created: 1 /13/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] [3/16/04] If you are providing a ditch easement by separate document,
then a note to the plat/utility plans will have to be added that includes the reception number
of the separately recorded document. The easement will need to be recorded with the
County before we can approve the mylars.
[1/13/04] Provide a signature block for the ditch company.
X,esponse: qTie reception number wiff6e providedon tfie nnyfar, this document is being recordedthis week
Number: 90 Created: 1 /16/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] [3/16/04] Your response notes that the vacation is being done by
separate document and that is ok, but the vacation will need to be filed and recorded with
the County and the reception number placed on the plat/utility plans before we can approve
the mylars.
[1/16/04] Vacate the old ditch easement with the plat.
Response: See response to#65.
Number: 111 Created: 3/16/2004
[8/24/04] [5/20/04] Some of the tracts shown do not have an access easement - will you
need this?
[3/16/04] Please provide a tract table that includes what each tract is for, who owns it, and
who maintains it.
Response: 91"o.
Page 5
0
Number: 163 Created: 3/19/2004
[8/27/04] [5/18/04] [3/19/04] Site/Landscape/Utility/Plat - please coordinate the comments
given under the various topics so that all plan sets present the same information.
Response: 9REngineering has attempted to coordinate allpCans.
Number: 235 Created: 8/24/2004
[8/24/04] Access ramp shown in front of lot 3 at Campfire and Vine leads to nowhere.
Please remove.
Response: Ramp was placedforfuture Cul-de-Sac across from Got 3. Ramp has been removedfor clarity.
Number: 236 Created: 8/24/2004
[8/24/04] A number of driveways are shown over storm inlets. This is not allowed.
(Response: (Driveway andinfets have been coordinatedso that there are no longer conflicts.
Number: 258 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] Please dimension the Day Care parking lot stalls and drive aisles on the Site and
Utility Plans.
(Response: (Dimensions added to plans.
Topic: Greenfie/ds Arterial
Number: 271 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] Looks good, just need the rest of the bridge design. See redlines for other minor
comments.
(Response: Mirror comments have been addressedand complete 6ridge design is included.
Topic: Landscape
Number: 125 Created: 3/16/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] [3/16/04] Please see comments under General.
Response: IVe have cleaned up the overlapping Gyres and la6efs as requested
Number: 171 Created: 5/18/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] Show and label all retaining walls.
Response: Retaining wafts are now labeled on aft plans.
Page 4
u . 6
Number: 36 Created: 1/13/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] A change has been made to the requirements below. The trees will not
be installed at this time along Vine and their costs will be included in the contribution in aid
for the developer's local street portion. Please continue to show the trees on the plans but
label the landscaping and utility plans that the trees will be installed with the Vine Drive
Road Improvements.
[3/19/04] [1/13/04] Engineering will require an interim and ultimate road design for Vine
Drive. The TIS shows the need for a right turn lane from Vine to Greenfields in the long
range. This project is responsible for dedicating the additional ROW and designing it in the
ultimate design. This project is also responsible for construction of Vine Drive along their
frontage, however, the City's Street Oversizing Dept prefers to construct the entire length of
Vine when it's realigned at some point in the future. This project will only construct the
sidewalk along their frontage and install the landscaping. A Contribution in Aid will be
accepted for the rest of their local street portion. An estimate prepared by JR Engineering
will be required prior to drafting the Development Agreement so that this amount can be
added to the DA.
Response: See Plant i1lotes 15 through 18 on landscape plan.
Response: Ter meeting, owner has agreed to resolve landscaping escrow issues within the development agreement
Number: 91 Created: 1 /16/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] [3/18/04] Just keeping this comment alive until we do the DA.
[1/16/04] Glacier Creek will not need to be constructed to the property line per the
discussion at Staff Review, January 14th. Cash in lieu of will be accepted so that the street
can be built at some point in the future. An estimate will be required from JR Engineering
for the City's review and approval so that the dollar amount can be included in the DA.
Response: Ter meeting, owner has agreed to escrow for that portion of Mader Creek that will not need to he
constructed.
Number: 92 Created: 1 /16/2004
(8/24/04] [5/20/04] [1/16/041 From Rick Richter/Pavement Management:
Will need a mitigation plan for swelling soils in the pavement design. Swell consolidation
testing should run at 500 PSF not 1,000.
Response: GroundT ngineering wiffsuhmit an Addendum to the Trail TeadTreliminary Soils Report once rough
grading is complete. GrounndEngineering wilfperform sweffconsofidation testing at 200TS(Fforpavement design
recommendations andwiffaddress footinng design issues at that time also.
Page 3
Number: 265 Created: 8/27/2004
[8/27/04] Corrections to lines 11 and 23 of the General Notes req'd.
12esponse: Corrections made to fines 11, 23 aZ 34.
Topic: General
Number: 29 Created: 1/13/2004
[8/24/04] [5/18/04] [3/16/04] The ditch easements can be filed by separate document but
the reception number of the separately recorded document will need to be noted on the plat
and utility plans. However, the ditch company may need to sign off on the utility plans if any
grading is being done around their ditch. Please see comments from Stormwater.
[1/13/04] The ditch company will need to sign off on the plat, site and utility plans. Please
provide the appropriate signature blocks.
Response: Reception num6erwiff be pfottedon myfar. Signature bfockhas been providedon grading sheets andon
cover of overall utility construction set.
Number: 31 Created: 1/13/2004
[8/24/04] The plans have been cleaned up nicely, however, there are a few scanning issues
that remain (overlapped labeling, etc).
[5/18/04] [3/16/04] The plans (site/plat/utility/landscape) are not scannable. Please see
Appendix E6 for minimum font sizes, etc. Please correct all overlapped labeling.
[1/13/04] See Appendix E6 for scannability requirements. Please correct all overlapped
labeling.
K,esponse: Have tried to catch all overlapping errors and remedy all scannability issues.
Number: 35 Created: 1/13/2004
[8/24/04] Please provide more information at the possible future underpass at Vine. Need
to show how the drainage works and that that location will work with the utilities. Need to
show the underpass in all plan and profiles.
[5/18/04] [3/19/04] Please provide the ultimate design for the underpass in accordance with
LCUASS. Include all necessary notes, details, structural calcs, etc. See examples given for
Young's Creek and Lind Property.
[1/13/04] A grade separated crossing is required where the future bike trail crosses
Greenfields. This project is responsible for the design and possibly the construction of this
underpass. Please coordinate with Craig Foreman in Parks Planning.
Response: Sheet number 23 of 23 has been added to cfearfy show possi6re future underpass and preliminary
drainage route. underpass arso shows up in aff proftfes wf:ere appfica6fe.
Page 2