HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRAILHEAD - PDP - 43-02A - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)[1/13/04] Corrections to the plat language are required.
Number: 65 Created: 1 /13/2004
[5/18/041 13/16/04] If you are providing a ditch easement by separate document, then a note to the plat/utility plans will
have to be added that includes the reception number of the separately recorded document. The easement will need to
be recorded with the County before we can approve the mylars.
[1/13/04] Provide a signature block for the ditch company.
Number: 90 Created: 1 /16/2004
[5/18/04] [3/16/04] Your response notes that the vacation is being done by separate document and that is ok, but the vacation
will need to be filed and recorded with the County and the reception number placed on the plat/utility plans before we can
approve the mylars.
[1/16/04] Vacate the old ditch easement with the plat.
Number: 95 Created: 1 /16/2004
(5/18/04] Has the naming of this street been approved by PFA?
[3/16/04] Lower Loop Drive can not be a Circle. Check with PFA for direction.
[1/16/04] From Technical Services: East/west portion of Lower Loop Dr needs to be renamed.
Number: 111 Created: 3/16/2004
[5/20/04] Some of the tracts shown do not have an access easement - will you need this?
[3/16/04] Please provide a tract table that includes what each tract is for, who owns it, and who maintains it.
Number: 116 Created: 3/16/2004
[5/18/04] Repeat comment. We have seen your response, however, this still needs to be located on the plat in order
for the plat to be approved.
[3/16/04] From Technical Services: Industrial and Gas easement not locatable on plat.
Number: 133 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/18/04] [3/19/04) See redlines for other comments.
Number: 189 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Show all driveways. Do not shade them, just an outline is fine.
Topic: Site
Number: 121 Created: 3/16/2004
[5/18/04] [3/16/04] See comments under General.
Number: 172 Created: 5/18/2004
[5/18/04] See Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. The cover sheet is illegible and will not scan. Please remove
grading for clarity. Remove the utilities from all sheets.
Number: 173
[5/18/04] Show and label all retaining walls.
Number: 188
(5/20/04] Remove the contours for legibility.
Number: 207
[5/20/04] Dimension all sidewalks and parkways.
Created: 5/18/2004
Created: 5/20/2004
Created: 5/20/2004
Page 5
[3/17/041 Please see red lines for additional access ramp locations throughout the development. Also the details sheet
needs to include the standard detail for directional access ramps for detached sidewalks. The center radial
ramp detail included in the plans is not required since all the sidewalks are detached. It is also recommended
that the crosswalks that lead to the Daycare Center and Club House be striped to highlight the pedestrian
crossing to motorists.
[1/14/04] Directional access ramps are required at the intersections with Vine Drive. If the street doesn't continue to the
south or doesn't align to a street to the south, than the directional ramps should only go east to west.
Number: 128 Created: 3/17/2004
[5/21/041 Regardless of the trail underpass the pedestrian street crossing facilities for Vine Drive are still needed and
are required as part of the standard intersection design. Please include these facilities within the next
submittal.
[3/17/04] The Greenfields/Vine Drive intersection needs to be designed as a standard arterial / arterial intersection if a
roundabout design is determined to be unsatisfactory. This means dedicated turn lanes in all directions, or adequate
space for future turn lanes, pedestrian enhanced crosswalks with minimum 6' median refuges, directional access ramps
and continuous bike lanes through the intersection.
5/19/04] The regional trial proposed through the site requires a minimum 30-foot public access easement. The
easement will need to be identified and labeled on the plat and all plan sets from the RR tracks to the Vine Drive
underpass.
(5/19/04] Please provide design details for the underpass designs and the trail bridge design.
15/19/04] The Vine Drive westbound right turn lane at Greenfields that leads into the Trailhead development needs to be
designed as a right turn lane with a bay taper and not as a continuous right turn lane from Campfire Drive.
Redline drawings are available at the Current Planning front desk. Be sure and return all of
your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Yours Truly,
Bob Barkeen
City Planner
Page 11
Number: 18 Created: 1/5/2004
[1/5/04] Hazardous Materials: This comment pertains to the club house and swimming pool. Corrosive,
flammable, reactive or toxic materials (as defined in the Uniform Fire Code), if used, stored or handled on site,
must have a Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis (HMIA) completed and supplied to the fire department and
Planning Department. FCLUC 3.4.5 (C)
Department: Police
Topic: General
Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom
Number: 175 Created: 5/18/2004
[5/18/04] Lighting plan for pool - recommend altering lighting plan to provide 1.0fc in south area of pool parking lot.
Topic: Landscape
Number: 174 Created: 5/18/2004
Pool/Day care plan does not have planting schedule - not with previous plans, either.
Department: Stormwater Utility
Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control
Number: 166
[5/26/04] REPEAT COMMENT
Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Created: 3/22/2004
This plan cannot be reviewed at this time - no calculations were submitted in Appendix G, and sheets of the plan set
relating to stormwater runoff control were not attached. The sediment erosion control sheets (not the general notes at
the front of the utility plan set), need to contain standard City erosion control notes, and the legend for BMP's. Also, it
would be much better if one sheet could be utilized to show the entire project and the BMP's needed to control
stormwater runoff. The other, more detailed sheets currently submitted could then be utilized for clarity on portions of
the project. If the project is to be phased, each phase must have a "stand alone" stormwater runoff control plan.
If you have any questions regarding erosion control, please call Bob Zakely at 224-6063.
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 227 Created: 5/26/2004
After talking with City Stormwater Staff, the CUHP method for calculating the hydrographs are not the City standard and
are not accepted. Please revise ModSWMM to utilize hydrographs generated by ModSWMM.
Number: 228 Created: 5/26/2004
Please provide an off -site drainage easement for the outlet pipe for Pond A located at the southwest corner of the site.
This easement needs to be 20 feet wide with the pipe centered in the easement.
Number: 230 Created: 5/27/2004
Please see redlined plans and report where most of the comments are located.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff
Topic: Transportation
Number: 78 Created: 1 /14/2004
[5/21/04) Please label the sidewalk connection along Vine Drive to the Waterglen subdivision as part of this project and
that it will be built with the Trailhead project.
(1/14/04) In order to achieve pedestrian level of service as identified in the TIS, the sidewalk along Vine Drive will need
to connect to the sidewalk along Waterglen's frontage. This may require discussions with the Waterglen HOA to
determine who bears the cost.
Number: 81 Created: 1 /14/2004
[5/21/04] The ramps added to the previous submittal need to be shown on the site and landscape plans in addition to
the utility plans.
Page 10
Department: Natural Resources
Topic: General
Number: 179
[5/19/04] No issues.
Department: PFA
Topic: General
Number: 9
Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Created: 5/19/2004
Issue Contact: Michael Chavez
Created: 1 /5/2004
[115/04] .Streets: Street names shall be verified and reviewed by the City Planning Department prior to being put in
service. Note: Several street names are in question.
Number: 10 Created: 1 /5/2004
[1/5/04] Addressing: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a
minimum 6-inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable.)
Multi -family buildings more than one floor in height shall abide by the following addressing requirements: First -
floor units shall be designated with 100's, second -floor units with 200's, third -floor units with 300's, and so on.
Some multi -family layouts may require address postings from the back side as well as the front side of buildings.
A clockwise addressing pattern shall be maintained whenever possible. Note: An addressing scheme shall be
submitted to the fire department for approval prior to being posted on the buildings. UFC 901.4.5; 901.4.4
Number: 11 Created: 1 /5/2004
[1/5/04] Water Supply/Commercial: No commercial buildings can be greater than 300 feet from a fire hydrant.
Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must
be capable of delivering 1,500 gallons per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. If a fire hydrant cannot be
provided, fire sprinklers shall be required. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2
Number: 12 Created: 1 /5/2004
[1/5/04] Water Supply/Residential (Outside GMA): No residential buildings can be greater than 400 feet from
a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 800 feet along an approved roadway. Each
hydrant must be capable of delivering 500 gallons per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. If a fire hydrant
cannot be provided, fire sprinklers shall be required. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2
Number: 13 Created: 1/5/2004
[1/5/04] Fire Lane: A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and be
maintained unobstructed. The fire lane shall be platted as an "Emergency Access Easement" on the final plat.
1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1; FCLUC
Number: 15 Created: 1 /5/2004
[1/5/04] Sprinkers: Fire sprinklers may be required. When any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior
wall off the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an
approved route around the exterior of the building or facility, it shall be fire sprinklered. Note: Buildings that are
fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fireline unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fireline.
1997 UFC 902.2.1
Number: 16
Created: 1 /5/2004
[1/5/04] Fire Alarm: A fire alarm system may be required for the day care center.
Number: 17 Created: 1 /5/2004
[1/5/04] Knox Box: Poudre Fire Authority requires a Knox Box to be mounted on the front of every new building
equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 1997 UFC 902.4; PFA Policy 88-20
Page 9
Number: 195 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Sheet 12 - driveways with rollover curb may not serve as a ramp access. Suggest moving the ramp shown at
Ridge Runner and Campfire to other side of the intersection.
Number: 196 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Sheet 15 - Refer to detail and sheet # for all FES. See redlines.
Number: 197 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] None of the storm crossings shown across the local streets at Vine (utility sheets 15 and 17) are shown in the
interim Vine design. How will this work?
Number: 198 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] The information shown in the water/sewer/storm needs to match in both the plan and profiles.
Number: 199 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/201041 Sheet 16 - Ramp at widening needs a matching ramp on the other side.
Number: 200 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Sheet 25 - show how the proposed water tine ties into the existing.
Number: 201 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Grading sheets - missing spot elevations on some lot corners.
Number: 202 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Remove the contour lines in the plan view from all plan and profile sheets for clarity.
Number: 203 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Please provide curb return, inlet, and station equations on the street profiles. Also show the underpass, gas
lines, etc where applicable.
Number: 204 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04) Sheet 87 - Curb Chart needs to be updated.
Number: 205 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Sheet 88 through 90 - see redlines.
Number: 206 Created: 5/20/2004
15/20/041 See each sheet of the redlines for other comments.
Number: 218 Created: 5/25/2004
[5/25/04] Provide type 3 barricades at all dead-end streets and sidewalks. Streets must be constructed far enough to
include the stormwater improvements shown on the plans.
Number: 220 Created: 5/25/2004
[5/25/04] A portion of the waterline in Vine Drive may need to be lowered so that the connections coming in from the
local streets are at the ultimate location.
Number: 221 Created: 5/25/2004
[5/25/04] See Craig Foreman's comments regarding the newly proposed location of the underpass in Greensfield.
Number: 222 Created: 5/25/2004
(5/25/04] Offsite drainage and construction shown at either end of the property at Vine. Offsite drainage easements
and construction easements are required. Please provide a letter of intent prior from the effected property owner prior
to scheduling the public hearing.
Page 8
Number: 149 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/20/04) Now sheet 74 - Only 150' is shown, please provide 500'.
[3/19/04] Sheet 70 - continuance of grade and ground lines for Glacier Creek Drive must be shown for 500' beyond the
proposed construction.
Number: 154 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/18/04] Repeat comment. See sheet 48 of 64, for example, of the Sidehill plans. This is how your plan and profiles
need to show the information. Right now they're not showing much information at all.
[3/19/04] Need to show how the project's interior local streets will connect to Vine in the interim. Sidehill is a good
example to look at - they have the same set of circumstances happening where all their locals connect to Timberline.
Number: 164 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/18/04] Repeat comment. Plans are missing some of the required info but it is not required until Final Compliance.
Please make your client aware that he is proceeding with the design at his option and at his own risk ($$) until the
Board's decision on the rezoning for the property.
[3/19/04] See the redlines on Appendix E4 for other comments. Most of them do not need to be done until Final
Compliance but it is always your option to work on them anytime.
Number: 176 Created: 5/18/2004
[5/18/04] Will need to show the street cuts into Vine for the utility connections. Please add the street cut note: Limits
of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs
to be in accordance with City street repair standards.
Number: 177 Created: 5/18/2004
[5/18/04] As discussed at conceptual and the first round of review, this project is responsible for the full design of the
ditch crossing on the north side of the property as well as contributing 1/2 their share of the costs of constructing it. All
applicable notes, details, and structural calcs must be provided in the plans. Please see Young's Creek and The Lind
Property for good example. An estimate will need to be prepared for the city's review and approval once the design has
been completed and that amount will go in the DA. This project must also provide a complete design for the underpass
at Vine with enough information so that it can be built in the field. Please see Lind and Young's Creek bluelines for
good examples of the information that will need to be provided on the plans for the bridge or culvert and the underpass.
Number: 178 Created: 5/18/2004
[5/18/04] No retaining walls are allowed within the utility easement. Please provide a design and all necessary details,
calcs for any and all walls over 30". Handrails (or fences) are required for any wall over 30".
Number: 190 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/041 None of the match lines/sheet numbers match up on the street plan and profile sheets.
Number: 191 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/201041 Sheet 10 -see redlines.
Number: 192 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Sheet 11 - the ditch culvert and head wall shown in Vine is labeled to be removed, however, its removal is not
shown in the interim or ultimate plan sheets. Please clarify.
Number: 193 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/041 Sheet 12- is the storm inlet shown at the end of Greenfields street going in? If so, the street will need to be
constructed far enough to accommodate that. If not, how will the drainage work in the interim? Please provide a type 3
barricade.
Number: 194 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Some of the access ramps shown at the T-Intersections are not necessary or they appear to conflict with
inlets or driveways and may be eliminated. See the overall utility sheet redlines to see where we have crossed them
out.
Page 7
Topic: Traffic Study
Number: 129 Created: 3/18/2004
[5/18/04] [3/18/04] A roundabout analysis is required at all arterial/arterial intersections, in this case, Greenfield and
Vine Drive.
Topic: Utility
Number: 38 Created: 1 /13/2004
[5/18/04] [3/16/041 Please see redlines.
[1/13/04] Corrections required to the General Notes. See redlines.
Number: 62 Created: 1 /13/2004
[5/20/041 Arterials (Vine and Greensfield, interim and ultimate) require cross sections every 50' at final compliance.
[1/13/04) Please provide preliminary cross sections (typical) for each street proposed.
Number: 85 Created: 1 /16/2004
[5/18/04] [3/16/041 Repeat comment. All off -site easements will require at minimum, a letter of intent from the effected
property owner before going to hearing. The actual easement can be provided during final compliance, however, the
mylars will not be approved until they have been submitted.
[1116/04] Will need off -site grading and construction easements.
Number: 88 Created: 1 /16/2004
[5/18/04] The details provided are illegible (could not review) and will not scan.
[3/16/041 Your response is acknowledged. This item may be addressed in Final Compliance and will remain open until
then.
(1/16/04] Using detail 7-24 as a template, show a detail for each and every street widening on the plan and profile
sheets calling out the various Lengths, Rs and Ws so that we can determine whether or not they are in compliance.
Number: 136 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/18/04] Repeat. Also, there are labels with arrows pointing to nothing.
13/19/04] Sheet 16, 17- Legibility and scanning issues, see redlines.
Number: 137 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/18/04] Scannability issues, lot 23 doesn't show utilities now. Label size and type of stormpipe. Refer to detail and
sheet on headwalls and Flared end sections.
[3/19/04] Sheet 18 - Lot 2 does not show the driveway or the utilities.
Number: 143 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/18/04] Repeat comment. In addition, spots must be provided at all lot corners (many are missing).
[3/19/04] Grading sheets - these are unscannable in general and many spot elevations are illegible. Please rotate all
labeling to the reader.
Number: 145 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/20/041 Need to show the underpass in all profiles so that we can see how the utilities will work with it and that you
are meeting the minimum cover requirements for both the utilities and the street.
[3/19/04] Sheet 57, 58 - Put the numbers in the key map by the corresponding drawing. How will the storm design at
Campfire and Vine work with the underpass?
Number: 148 Created: 3/19/2004
15/18/041 The detail shown is unscannable, illegible, and unreviewable.
[3/19/04] Sheet 68 - Please see detail 7-24 for the correct way to dimension the street widening details. See redlines.
Page 6
[5/26/04] The sidewalk and landscaping along undeveloped tracts should not be installed at this time. Please show on
plans but label as "future sidewalk" and "future landscaping" or "trees to be installed when Tract develops in the
future". Type 3 barricades need to be installed at all dead end sidewalks.
Topic: Greensfields Arterial
Number: 162 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/18/04] [3/19/04] Comment number 152 applies here as well.
Number: 223 Created: 5/26/2004
[5/26/04] Please submit a separate Appendix E4 with the next round of review.
Number: 224 Created: 5/26/2004
[5/26/04] See comments under General and applicable comments under Utility.
Topic: Hearing
Number: 226 Created: 5/26/2004
[5/26/04] To summarize, in order to go to hearing, we'll need letters of intent for the offsite construction, grading, and
drainage easements and ditch crossings. A letter from the RR will be required for the drainage pipe going underneath
them to the east. Finally, any variances to the project will have to be submitted and approved before we'll allow the
project to schedule the hearing.
Topic: Landscape
Number: 125 Created: 3/16/2004
[5/16/04) [3/16/04] Please see comments under General.
Number: 170 Created: 5/18/2004
[5/18/04] See Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. Correct all overlapped labeling, minimum font size
requirements, etc.
Number: 171 Created: 5/18/2004
[5/18/04] Show and label all retaining walls.
Number: 180 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Please provide street trees along all local streets.
Number: 181 Created: 5/20/2004
15/20/041 Place a note that all trees along Vine Drive will be installed with the Ultimate Vine Drive Road Improvements.
Number: 182 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Sheet 3 - ROW needs to be dedicated to the back of walk.
Number: 183 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Show all driveways.
Number: 184 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Sheet 7 - Do not construct the sidewalk in Tract K at this time. Label as Future Sidewalk.
Number: 185 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Remove contours for legibility. The plans are difficult to read.
Topic: Plat
Number: 63 Created: 1 /13/2004
(5/18/04] Corrections required to the tract statement.
[3/16/041 Repeat comment.
Page 4
[3/19/04] [1/13/041 Engineering will require an interim and ultimate road design for Vine Drive. The TIS shows the
need for a right turn lane from Vine to Greensfields in the long range. This project is responsible for dedicating the
additional ROW and designing it in the ultimate design. This project is also responsible for construction of Vine Drive
along their frontage, however, the City's Streetoversizing Dept prefers to construct the entire length of Vine when it's
realigned at some point in the future. This project will only construct the sidewalk along their frontage and install the
landscaping. A Contribution in Aid will be accepted for the rest of their local street portion. An estimate prepared by JR
Engineering will be required prior to drafting the Development Agreement so that this amount can be added to the DA.
Number: 91 Created: 1 /16/2004
[5/18/04] [3/18/04] Just keeping this comment alive until we do the DA.
[1/16/04] Glacier Creek will not need to be constructed to the property line per the discussion at Staff Review, January
14th. Cash in lieu of will be accepted so that the street can be built at some point in the future. An estimate will be
required from JR Engineering for the City's review and approval so that the dollar amount can be included in the DA.
Number: 92 Created: 1 / 16/2004
[5/20/04] [1/16/04) From Rick Richter/Pavement Management:
Will need a mitigation plan for swelling soils in the pavement design. Swell consolidation testing should run at 500 PSF
not 1,000.
Number: 130 Created: 3/18/2004
[5/18/041 To answer your question, the TIS does not determine whether or not an intersection has full movement or
not. The Land Use Code states in 3.6.3.0 and D that full movement Collector and Local Street Intersections with
Arterial streets shall be provided every 1320' and that additional, limited movement Collector and Local Street
Intersections with Arterial Streets shall be spaced at intervals not to exceed 660'. The only full movement intersection
allowed for this development is at Greenfields and Vine. All other intersections are limited movement only as stated
below.
[3/18/04] Wagontrail and Vine is limited to a right -in, right -out only. 3/4 access at Lower Loop Drive
Number: 132 Created: 3/18/2004
[5/18/04] Note placed on Plat. Still need note on Site Plan.
(3/18/04] Please place a note on the Plat and Site plan limiting the "alley" loaded lots to rear access only and that no
driveways allowed off the front.
Number: 163 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/18/04) [3/19/041 Site/Landscape/Utility/Plat - please coordinate the comments given under the various topics so that
all plan sets present the same information.
Number: 186 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Minimum parkway widths are not being met at the underpass on Greenfields.
Number: 187 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Sight distance requirements do not appear to be met as you exit the underpass.
Number: 215 Created: 5/25/2004
[5/25/04] The interim and ultimate designs for Vine drive are confusing and do not provide enough information. Also,
the local streets that connect to Vine are shown as not being constructed for quite a distance leading up to Vine while it
appears from the grading that it is possible to construct the locals to the PCs. Suggest setting up a meeting prior to the
next submittal so that we can coordinate what needs to be built now versus what needs to be built later. More
comments to follow as plans are changed and more information is given.
Number: 219 Created: 5/25/2004
[5/25/04] A retaining wall is now shown at the back of Tract 0. Please place a note on the site and utility plans that 28'
is required from the garage face to the retaining wail.
Number: 225
Created: 5/26/2004
Page 3
[3/19/041 Sheet 5 - 3/4 access at Lower Loop Drive
Number: 158 Created: 3/19/2004
(5/18/041 See response to comment #130.
[3/19/041 Sheet 6 - Right In Right Out only at Wagon Trail and Vine.
Number: 160 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/18/04] If Note 2 does not apply, then take it off so there isn't any confusion. If it does apply, then submit a variance stating
where it doesn't apply, why the insufficient lengths exist and why you can not make the minimums. This variance would need
to be submitted and approved prior to scheduling the public hearing.
[3/19/04] Sheet 9 - Note number 2 states that insufficient lengths were available for the taper lengths and that
modifications were made. Variance requests will be necessary, please see 1.9.4.
Number: 161 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/20/04] The underpass design needs to be included here as well.
[3/19/04] Sheet 10 - Please provide all the details shown and/or asked for on sheets 83-85. In addition, please provide
detail 1608.
Number: 211 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Please see comments under the Trailhead plans where applicable.
Number: 212 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] See redlines for other comments.
Number: 217 Created: 5/25/2004
[5/25/04] Please submit a separate appendix E4 with the next round of review for these plan sets.
Topic: General
Number: 29 Created: 1/13/2004
[5/18/04] (3/16/04] The ditch easements can be filed by separate document but the reception number of the separately
recorded document will need to be noted on the plat and utility plans. However, the ditch company may need to sign off
on the utility plans if any grading is being done around their ditch. Please see comments from Stormwater.
[1/13/04] The ditch company will need to sign off on the plat, site and utility plans. Please provide the appropriate
signature blocks.
Number: 31 Created: 1/13/2004
[5/18/04] [3/16/04] The plans (site/plat/utility/landscape) are not scannable. Please see Appendix E6 for minimum font
sizes, etc. Please correct all overlapped labeling.
[1/13/04] See Appendix E6 for scannability requirements. Please correct all overlapped labeling.
Number: 35 Created: 1/13/2004
[5/18/041 [3/19/04] Please provide the ultimate design for the underpass in accordance with LCUASS. Include all
necessary notes, details, structural calcs, etc. See examples given for Young's Creek and Lind Property.
[1/13/04] A grade -separated crossing is required where the future bike trail crosses Greenfields. This project is
responsible for the design and possibly the construction of this underpass. Please coordinate with Craig Foreman in
Parks Planning.
Number: 36 Created: 1/13/2004
[5/18/04] A change has been made to the requirements below. The trees will not be installed at this time along Vine and their
costs will be included in the contribution in aid for the developer's local street portion. Please continue to show the trees on the
plans but label the landscaping and utility plans that the trees will be installed with the Vine Drive Road Improvements.
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
citvof Fort Collins
VF RIPLEY ASSOC. Date: 05/24/2004
LINDA RIPLEY
401 W. MOUNTAIN AVE. #201
FT. COLLINS, CO 80521
Staff has reviewed your submittal for TRAILHEAD PDP - TYPE I (LUC), and we offer the
following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 169
[5/24/04]
Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen
Created: 3/22/2004
[3/22/04] Landscaping along the recreation trail will need to be shown (especially for bank stabilization) or noted if it will
be planted concurrent with the multi -family parcels.
Department: Engineering
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: East Vine Drive Interim
Number: 208 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] This set needs to be coordinated with the Trailhead Development so that the info shown matches.
Number: 209 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/041 Please provide cross sections every 50' as required by LCUASS.
Number: 210 Created: 5/20/2004
[5/20/04] Please see comments under the Trailhead plans where applicable.
Number: 213
[5/20/04] See redlines for other comments.
Created: 5/20/2004
Number: 216 Created: 5/25/2004
[5/25/04] Please submit a separate appendix E4 with the next round of review for these plan sets.
Topic: East Vine Drive Ultimate
Number: 152 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/20/04] [3/19/04] This must be a stand-alone set, so they will also need all the same notes and details as the main
set. Please provide construction notes, erosion control, etc. Please provide all appropriate details. Corrections are
required to the General Notes, Owner Name, and Stormwater contact.
Number: 156 Created: 3/19/2004
[5/20/04) Need 1000' of preliminary vertical design west of the project's frontage as required by code. Because Vine
Drive's alignment has not been approved and the alignment may change in the future, a variance to this requirement
will be approved. The variance will need to be submitted and approved prior to scheduling the public hearing for this
project.
[3/19/04] Plan and Profile sheet 3 - Remove note 2. Need to show existing grade and proposed grades. These can be
adjusted in the future but we need to have the assurance that what you're proposing will basically work.
Number: 157
[5/18/04] See response to comment #130.
Created: 3/19/2004
Page 1
Re:
Date: 27 - C-) �{
Fax: Lt .q ( q 9
Pages:
(including this cover sheet)
RM
From the desk of...
Bob Barkeen
City Planner
City of Fort Collins - Current Planning
281 North College Avenue
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
Email: bbarkeen@fcgov.com
970.221.6750
Fax: 970.416.2020