Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRAILHEAD - PDP - 43-02A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - DRAINAGE REPORTalong the north side of East Vine Drive into a natural grass swale that flows into a sump inlet which discharges into a detention pond on the Waterglen, P.U.D. The Rational Method determined the 2-yr and 100-yr historic flows to be 3.66 cfs and 10.3 cfs, respectively. Basin H-15 consists of 47.9 acres and is located in the northeastern portion of the site. This basin corresponds to master drainage basin 15. However, flows in this basin first drain southwest at slopes ranging from 0.2 to 1.9 percent to the Larimer and Weld Canal, where they then drain east and north to design point 15 located in the upper northeast corner of the basin. The Rational Method determined the 2-yr and 100-yr flows for this basin to be 4.34 cfs and 12.14 cfs, respectively. The Waterglen P.U.D. combined these two basins as offsite basin OS-2 and sized the detention pond in the Waterglen P.U.D. to include the flow from this combined basin as offsite flows of 7.41 cfs. Therefore, when releasing from our pond to the Waterglen P.U.D., we will maintain a release rate of 7.41cfs. Basin H-16, located in the southwestern portion of the site, consists of 27.4 acres and corresponds with basin 16 in the master drainage plan. Flows from this basin travel southwest at slopes of 0.3 to 2.9 percent to an old wooden culvert and RCP. These flows travel under East Vine Drive and the railroad tracks to historic master basin 10. The Rational Method determined the 2-yr and 100-yr flows for this basin to be 4.70 cfs and 13.21 cfs, respectively. 3. LOCAL DEVELOPED DRAINAGE DESIGN 3.1 Method The Rational Method was used to determine the 2-year and 100-year flows for the sub -basins indicated in this drainage report. Drainage facilities were designed to convey the 100-year peak flows. In most instances the flows were routed according to their time of concentration so that the calculations in Appendix E will not just be adding maximum flows to each inlet. They will be shown as the peak flow through that pipe with the routed flows. The hydrologic calculations are found in Appendix B of this report. Drainage and Erosion Control Report . Page 3 Trail Head Property November 25, 2003 N 15 -15 47.9 .20! 49 1/ 27.4 .20 9=8.9 CFScaX�- 16 ®■■■■■■■■■m szs or am I —14 F49eo; (I/ I/ /J 17.5 .20 &1Ir 1�� r� LEGEND DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY MAJOR EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR EXISTING CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARY — — — — — OVERLAND FLOW CHANNELIZED FLOW Q= 2-YR HISTORIC STORM FLOW DIRECTION 400 200 0 400 800 101 BASIN IDENTIFICATION 1.0 .80 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT AREA IN ACRES 10 DESIGN POINT HISTORIC BASINS TRAIL HEAD PROPERTY JOB NO. 39145.11 OCTOBER 03, 2003 SHEET 1 OF 1 J•R ENGINEERING A aubgkkry of WKI x 1 " = 400' 2620 East Prospect Rw4 && 190 • Fat Casts, CO WO 970-491-9 -Fax9M-491-99B4•wviwjengiieai = 1.4 Design Criteria This report was prepared to meet or exceed the submittal requirements established in the City of Fort Collins' "Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards" (SDDCCS), dated May 1984 and revised in January 1997. Where applicable, the criteria established in the "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual" (UDFCD) dated 1984, developed by the Denver Regional Council of Governments has been utilized. The rainfall criteria used was the April 1999 amended criteria. 1.5 Master Drainage Basin Trail Head Property lies in the Boxelder Creek/Cooper Slough Basin. The master study for this area is the "Technical Documentation for the Hydrologic Modeling of the Boxelder Creek/Cooper Slough Basin, Volume r' by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., 2002, henceforth referred to as the master drainage plan in this report. Another applicable report is the "Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report Waterglen, P.U.D." by JR Engineering, dated August 11, 1997. Trail Head Property is located in the master plan basin number 15, and in portions of 14 and 16. The existing drainage patterns for this site, as identified in the master drainage plan, are incorrect (refer to Figure B.2 in Appendix A). Two discrepancies were noted. Basin 16 does not drain southwest to Basin 11 but drains south to Basin 10. Basin 15 drains north via the Latimer and Weld Canal to Basin 14. Therefore, in order to determine the correct 2-yr historic storm event, the historic flows for this site were reanalyzed in this report. 2. HISTORIC (EXISTING) DRAINAGE For this analysis, based on existing topography, the Trail Head Property was divided into three historic drainage basins, H-14, H-15 and H-16 (refer to Figure 1). The Rational Method was then used to determine the 2-year and 100-year historic flows for each basin. Basin H-14 consists of 17.5 acres and is located in the southeast portion of the site. This basin corresponds with the southwestern portion of master drainage basin 14. Flows in this basin consist of on -site flows via overland flow in a southeasterly direction to design point 14 located in the southeastern corner of the basin at slopes that range from 0.5 to 5.8 percent. Once these flows leave the Trail Head Property, they are conveyed easterly via gutter flow Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page 2 Trail Head Property November 25, 2003 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description Trail Head Property is located in the Southeast One -Quarter and the Northeast One -Quarter of Section 4, Township 7 North, Range 68 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in the -City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado. The Trail Head Property is bounded on the south by East Vine Drive, on the east by Waterglen, P.U.D. and on the northwest by the Colorado and Southern (C & S) Railroad. A location map is provided in Appendix A. 1.2 Existing Site Characteristics The project site includes approximately 88.8 acres of land. The majority of the Trail Head Property is covered with native grasses. The southwest side of the property is currently being farmed with alfalfa. The soils in the area are reported in the Soil Survey of Larimer County Area, Colorado and are identified as being predominately Fort Collins Loams (soil number 35), Nunn Clay Loams (soil number 73) and Santana Loams (soil number 95). These soils belong to the hydrologic group C and are known to have slight to moderate erosive characteristics and slow to moderate runoff characteristics. Please refer to Appendix A for specifics on each soil. East Vine Drive is an existing two-lane road and is anticipated to be improved to a four -lane arterial street in the near future. JR Engineering is currently designing an ultimate layout for the portion of East Vine Drive directly south of the site from Elgin Court to about 1000 feet west of the Trail Head Property boundary. This ultimate design is considered in the design of Trail Head Property. 1.3 Purpose and Scope of Report This report defines the proposed drainage and erosion control plan for Trail Head Property. The plan includes consideration of all on -site and if applicable, tributary off -site runoff. The plan addresses the hydrologic ramifications associated with the development of the Trail Head Property and identifies the proposed storm facilities that will allow this project to develop without impacting downstream properties. _ Drainage and Erosion Control Report Page t Trail Head Property November 25, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TRANSMITTAL LETTER.................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................. ii 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Description......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Existing Site Characteristics........................................................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose and Scope of Report ......................................................................................... 1 1.4 Design Criteria................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Master Drainage Basin................................................................................................... 2 2. HISTORIC (EXISTING) DRAINAGE................................................................................ 2 3. LOCAL DEVELOPED DRAINAGE DESIGN (To be submitted with First Final) .......3 3.1 Method............................................................................................................................3 3.2 General Flow Routing.................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Proposed Drainage Plan................................................................................................. 4 3.4 Hydrologic Analysis of the Proposed Drainage Conditions ........................................... 8 4. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS (To be submitted with First Final) ......................................... 9 4.1 Allowable Street Capacity.............................................................................................. 9 4.2 Inlet Sizing...................................................................................................................... 9 4.3 Storm Sewer System....................................................................................................... 9 4.4 Pond Description..........................................................................................................10 5. MODSWMM AND EXTRAN (To be submitted with First Final)..................................11 6. EROSION CONTROL (To be submitted with First Final).............................................13 6.1 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures..................................................................... 13 6.2 Dust Abatement............................................................................................................13 6.3 Tracking Mud on City Streets...................................................................................... 13 6.4 Maintenance................................................................................................................. 14 6.5 Permanent Stabilization................................................................................................ 14 7. REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................15 Appendix A: Maps and Figures Appendix B: Hydrologic Calculations Appendix C: Street Capacity Calculations (To be submitted with First Final) Appendix D: Inlet Calculations (To be submitted with First Final) Appendix E: Storm Pipe and Swale Calculations (To be submitted with First Final) Appendix F: Pond Sizing Calculations Including ModSwmm (To be submitted with First Final) Appendix G: Erosion Control (To be submitted with First Final) Appendix H: Reference Reports DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL REPORT Trail Head Property Prepared for: Hartshorn Properties, LLC Mr. Ken Crumb, Manager P.O. Box 337600 Greeley, Colorado 80633 (970)304-1392 Prepared by: JR Engineering 2620 E. Prospect Road, Suite 190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 (970)491-9888 December 23, 2003 A SL': o• sr 37953 Timothy J. Halopoff, P.E. Exp. 10/31/2005 Job Number 39145.11 J•R ENGINEERING A Westrian Company December 23, 2003 Mr. Basil Hamdan City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Trail Head Drainage and Erosion Control Report Dear Mr. Hamdan: We are pleased to submit to you for your review and approval this preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Report for Trail Head Property. All computations within this report have been completed in compliance with the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria. Since this submittal has been deemed a preliminary submittal at 50% completion, JR Engineering has provided existing condition rational hydrology calculations, preliminary developed condition hydrology calculations, preliminary detention facility sizing calculations and anticipated plan view storm drain sizing on the overall utility layout. Once the general drainage patterns and storm drain locations have been preliminarily reviewed and accepted, we plan to fully analyze all hydrology, hydraulic and erosion control aspects of drainage on this site. These analyses will be provided in this report with future submittals. We greatly appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this preliminary submittal. Please, feel free to contact me with any questions or comments that you may have. Sincerely, Timothy J. Halopoff, P.E. Project Engineer 2620 Fast Prospect Road, Suite 190, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-491-9888 • Fax: 970-491-9984 • w ..jrengineering.com