Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWYKOFF-LARIMER ANNEXATION & ZONING - SEGMENT 2 - 57-98A - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPlanning and Zoning Board Minutes February 4, 1999 Page 5 Member Craig commented that she supports the motion. Everyone knows she is for the "green". In reading everything that staff has provided, they are trying very hard to give this piece of property monetary value, but keeping the green and the transition as was wanted by everyone who put the Structure Map together. Chairperson Colton also would support the motion for denial of the change to the Structure Plan. He believed that this was a real important part of the city Structure Plan to recognize some areas with larger urban estates as well as open space. The motion was approved 4-0. Member Gavaldon moved to recommend approval of the RF, Residential Foothills zoning for Wykoff - Larimer First, #57-98. Member Weitkunat seconded the motion. Member Weitkunat felt that RF was the appropriate zoning based on its location and proximity to the foothills and its access to rural open lands and stream corridors in that area. She felt it was extremely appropriate for where it is located and it does meets the intent and purposes of the city structure map. She felt that clustering can occur and accomplish the purposes. She felt that in the long run Mr. Larimer would end up with the units that he needs. The motion was approved 4-0. Member Gavaldon moved to recommend approval of the Wykoff - Larimer Annexation, #57-98A. Member Weitkunat seconded the motion. The motion was approved 4-0. Member Gavaldon moved to recommend denial of the requested Structure Plan Map amendment for the Wykoff - Larimer Annexation, #57-98A. The motion was approved 4-0. Member Gavaldon moved to recommend approval of the RF, Residential Foothills zoning for the Wykoff - Larimer Annexation, #57-98A. The motion was approved 4-0. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes February 4, 1999 Page 4 Mr. Larimer responded that until a development proposal is filed, the actual net as opposed to gross acreage of this parcel cannot be physically determined. By his interpretation of the current Land Use Code for the natural area buffer zone, approximately 10 to 11 acres of this property would be in the buffer zone, leaving only a net acreage of 10 acres. If the cluster option is looked at, you have to have 50% of your land open anyway, so the net residential development acreage is already reduced to 10 acres. In addition, the staff report recommended that they don't build on the north side of Spring Creek because they want it for public open lands, which would limit him further to just 6 acres, or 6 net acres at 1 unit per net acre, that would be 6 units clustered on 6 acres on a 20 acre parcel. That does not make residential development feasible. Mr. Larimer felt that if the city wants annexation, they should be competitive with what the County would allow on the property -- in allowing at least the density that the FA-1 would allow, which was 2 units per acre or 40 units on that parcel overall. The new City Plan does not allow for that under the RF or the UE, so the only alternative he has is to apply for the LMN residential district. Director Blanchard clarified that we do not know if the property on the north would be purchased so it should not enter into the discussion tonight. Secondly, if the property is developed as an RF Cluster Plan, then the applicant would be required to dedicate the property. Director Blanchard stated that he an Mr. Larimer disagree in how the code is interpreted for this situation. Member Weitkunat asked if Director Blanchard felt the two parcels to the east were compatible with this property. Director Blanchard replied he did. Member Gavaldon agreed with staffs recommendation. Member Gavaldon moved to recommend approval of Wykoff - Larimer, First Annexation, #57-98. Member Craig seconded the motion. The motion was approved 4-0. Member Gavaldon moved to recommend denial of the requested amendment to the Structure Plan Map for the Wykoff - Larimer Annexation, #57-98. Member Craig seconded the motion. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes February 4, 1999 Page 3 the RF zoning district, and that makes it totally unfeasible. With current impact fees and the water/sewer cost to extend the mains and get the infrastructure done, it is unfeasible to consider residential development on this parcel. Mr. Larimer entered into the record a picture of the property. The picture indicated that Olander Elementary School was just north of the property. Mr. Larimer stated that the property was within '/z mile of Olander Elementary and that the property provided contiguity and connectivity to the school from this property and other properties in the area. This was a parcel that was close to a major recreational area, Horsetooth Reservoir, and he felt the area was defined as a neighborhood center and argued that only 6 lucky families would get to live here. Mr. Larimer noted the density of the surrounding neighborhoods being higher and stated that there should be 40 units clustered on this property. Mr. Larimer closed by saying that the annexation would help the city, but it has to be made feasible for the other parties involved. He asked the Board to consider his request to zone the property LMN. Public Input None. Member Craig asked about utilities and what was available out there. Mr. Larimer replied there was water in 38E and sewer at Highlands West. The city has the sewer in Highlands West and Fort Collins Loveland Water District down 38E. Chairperson Colton asked about Mr. Larimers claim that only 5 units could be built on this property. Director Blanchard replied that he did not agree. He stated that if the entire parcel is zoned Residential Foothills, there are two options. You can develop the entire parcel at 1 home per 2.29 acres, 100,000 s.f., which would give you about 6 units. The other option, is to develop as a residential cluster plan at a density of 1 home per net acre. For discussion purposes, a 3 acre buffer on each side of Spring Creek is subtracted and would leave a net acreage at 1 home per acre, so the property would net around 17 homes. Director Blanchard cautioned the Board that until a decision on the natural areas that are mapped is made, we really can't talk in terms of actual numbers and be confident about it. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes February 4, 1999 Page 2 Road. The site is currently zoned FA1, Farming in Larimer County. The requested zoning is LMN, Low Density Mixed Use Neighborhood. This zoning requires an amendment of the City Structure Plan from Rural Open Lands and River Corridor to Low Density Mixed Use Residential. Second: Request for voluntary annexation of 14.47 acres of land located north of County Road 38E, west of Taft Hill Road. The site is currently zoned FA-1 Farming in Larimer County. The requested zoning requires an amendment of the City Structure Plan from Rural Open Lands and River Corridor and Urban Estates to Low Density Mixed Use Residential. Staff Recommendation: Recommend approval of the annexation. Recommend denial of the Structure Plan amendment; and, Recommend approval of the RF, Foothills Residential zoning. Hearing Testimony, Written Comments and Other Evidence Bob Blanchard, Director of Current Planning gave the staff presentation and recommendation on both items. Director Blanchard showed slides of the property and surrounding areas; and, stated that the applicant has requested a Structure Plan amendment and subsequent zoning of LMN, Low Density Mixed Use Neighborhood. Brett Larimer, 1600 West Horsetooth Road and co -applicant of the request gave the applicant's presentation. Mr. Larimer stated that he agrees that the property does meet the contiguity requirements, but did not agree with the staffs recommendation for zoning of the property. Mr. Larimer indicated that he is requesting a zoning of LMN, Low Density Mixed Use Neighborhood. He felt that if it is left with a staff recommendation of RF, Foothills Residential, would only give the property a density of 5 lots sprawled on about 20 acres, given the boundaries and restrictions of the natural areas. He stated that about 50% of the 20 acres is a developable parcel, which fits more into the clustering context than the sprawl context for this particular parcel. Mr. Larimer stated that they were not going to be unavailable to discuss with Natural Areas about selling the northern section of Spring Creek, since they have offered them an incentive to do so for a natural separation for the public open lands there. He stated that they are not opposed to that, but at this time there is no incentive to do that. Staff has limited them and gave them the ultimatum of saying that if they choose not to sell the property north of Spring Creek, then the property will be zoned RF. RF will never get enough density, only 6 homes will be offered if the land is to be developed under PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1999 6:30 P.M. Council Liaison: Scott Mason Chairperson: Glen Colton Vice Chair: Sally Craig Staff Liaison: Bob Blanchard Phone: (H) 225-2760 (M 679-3201 Phone: (H) 484-9417 The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chairperson Colton. Roll Call: Weitkunat, Gavaldon, Craig, Colton. Members Davidson, Meyer and Carpenter were absent. Staff Present: Blanchard, Eckman, Deines, Wamhoff, McCallum, Schlueter, Shepard and Olt. Agenda Review: Director of Current Planning Blanchard reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agenda's: 1. Minutes of the November 19, 1998 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing. 2. Resolution PZ99-3 Easement Vacation 3. #46-98 Howell Building - Project Development Plan. 4. #57-98 Wykoff - Larimer First Annexation & Zoning. 5. #57-98A Wykoff - Larimer Second Annexation & Zoning. 6. Recommendation to City Council Regarding the Larimer County Regional Road and Park Capital Expansion Fees. 7. #66-93G Windtrail Park P.U.D., Amended Preliminary and Final. Director Blanchard pulled items 4 and 5 for discussion. Item 7 was moved to the Consent Agenda. Member Gavaldon moved to approve Consent items 1, 2, 3, and 7. Member Weitkunat seconded the motion. The motion was approved 4-0. Project: Wykoff - Larimer Annexation and Zoning First, #57-98 Wykoff - Larimer Annexation and Zoning Second, #57-98A Project Description: First: Request for the voluntary annexation of 6.69 acres of land located north of County Road 38E, west of Taft Hill