HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRAILHEAD ANNEXATION & ZONING - 43-02 - CORRESPONDENCE -Cathy Mathis
From: Bob Barkeen [BBarkeen@fcgov.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:44 AM
To: cmathis@vfavfr.com
Subject: Re: Caribou
0
TEXT.htm
Cathy,
I spoke with Ken and Clark on the caretakers unit at Caribou, they agreed that the unit does meet the requirement in the
E zone district, so a modification will not be necessary.
I wanted to give you a heads up on the Trailhead Annexation. The structure plan amendment was discussed at the
Growth Management Lead Team this week. The outcome of the meeting was to recommend the structure plan remain as
it is currently shown (LMN). Reasons for not supporting the change to LMN included
The future interchange with Vine Drive and 1-25;
The proximity to the Burlington Northern Rail line;
The remnant E designated parcel to the west;
The further decrease of E designated parcels within the City;
Lack of a demonstrated need to change the Mountain Vista Sub -Area Plan.
This item is scheduled for staff review next Wednesday, the 'official' comments will be forwarded to you the following
week.
Thanks, Bob
>>> "Cathy Mathis" <cmathis@vfavfr.com> 11/05/02 10:48AM >>>
Hey Bob, Linda and I were wondering what makes this project a P & Z (Type
II) review?
Also, did you clarify whether or not we need a modification on the 2
different building types issue? Remember that some of staff (Clark Mapes
and Cameron) said that 1 unit in the clubhouse counted as a mixed -use
building and we were moving forward under that assumption.
Thanks