Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWILLOW BROOK ANNEXATION & ZONING NO. 3 - 8-99B1 - CORRESPONDENCE - CITY STAFFTed Shepard Re Detention requireme or affordable housingparcel off Kechter I From: Basil Hamdan To: Ted Shepard Date: 2/27/02 2:48PM Subject: Re: Detention requirements for affordable housing parcel off Kechter Rd. Ted, I spoke to Ben Herman from Nolte this afternoon, we had a previously scheduled meeting about the High school detention requirements and told him in essenece to reserve some room in the pond for the parcel. He said that should be no problem since they seem to have plenty of room in their pond. That corner of their property was not usable for much else so they designed an oversized pond to serve for irrigation and detention. The surface area of that pond seems to be much more that what they would need had they been trying to maximize their use on their land. basil >>> Ted Shepard 02/27/02 02:43PM >>> Basil, thanks for the analysis. Ralph and I will run these numbers by Nolte, the PSD consulting engineer. Knowing we can move the stormwater detention obligation over to the larger pond means that the estimate of 40 dwelling units is conservative and that a creative site planner could probably get more units on the site. Thanks again, Ted. >>> Basil Hamdan 02/27 1:10 PM >>> Dear Ralph, I spoke with you today regarding the potential future development of a parcel of land located just to the east of the park/school district (the Webster Farm) property where the school is designing the future 2004 High School. From what you have informed me the parcel is about 4.8 acres in size, and is planned to be partially developed as a multi family project. Assuming the future coefficient of runoff for this parcel is at 0.6 which is a reasonable guess for the intensity of development that is projected on this parcel, and given that the piece is in the McClelland's Creek basin where the release rate is 0.5 cfs/Acre or 2.4 cfs total according to the City's drainage master plan for the McClelland's Basin; the addtional detention that would be needed for this piece is about 0.7 Acre-feet or about 30,000 cubic feet of additional detention volume that would be needed on the school/park site. If the site is to develop at a more intense rate, say a coefficient of runoff of 0.7, then the detention volume required for this site would be in the neighborhood of 0.9 Acre-feet. Since it seems that the school district and park are planning a large facility on their site this additional volume needs to be compared to their current detention volume requirement and might not be very significant. The current plans for the 2004 High School/Park pond show a total pond volume of 32 Acre-feet with about 13.5 Acre-ft of that reserved for irrigation storage and the rest slated for detention storage. These numbers are based on preliminary calculations submitted by the school district for their site, and may change as the plans for the 2004 High School are finalized. Looking at the site topography it seems that the site does drain from east to west, which woul allow this parcel to be drained to the west into the school/park pond. I believe alsoo that it would be advantageous to combine the water quality component required of this site into the larger pond as it would be a much more efficient use of space and would provide for better water quality treatment. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Basil Hamdan Civil Engineer II City of Fort Collins Utilities-Stormwater