HomeMy WebLinkAboutMARCH, OLIVE & PHARRIS, LLC LAW OFFICES - PDP - PDP140008 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS.If
Elevations shown on site plan —12' height, currently exiting open design will be retained.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated:
06/30/2014
06/30/2014: Is there a handicap ramp proposed? Please show location if so.
No handicap ramp is proposed, ground level garage space to be modified to accommodate handicapped
needs/accessibility.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
06/30/2014
06/30/2014: The diagonal parking will require some of the spaces to "pass through" on to the adjoining
lot as vehicles parked in the three spaces to the west of the designated "pass through" should not
have to back up to through the lane to pull forward through the pass through. In addition the designated pass
through area doesn't appear to be wide enough as a one way isle width should be at least 12'wide.
Shared drive concept has been abandoned and pull through is therefore no longer necessary.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated:
06/30/2014
06/30/2014: The handicap space is insufficient in width. Even with one HC space it should be a
minimum of 8' wide and another 8' of a hatched out area for access out and into a van.
See changes made to site plan.
It is believed that the foregoing addresses staff comments. If you could review and confirm that
the matter is ripe to be scheduled for administrative hearing it would be appreciated.
cc: Cameron Gloss
Martina Wilkinson
Karen McWilliams
Sheri Langenberger
Sincerely yours,
MARCH, OLIVE & PHARRIS, LLC
J. Brad March
the walkway for people to get from their parking spaces to the front door?
Shared drive concept has been abandoned. Applicant meeting scheduled with Mrs. Wilkinson on
8/15/14.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014: Transportation Planning staff notes that the handicapped parking stall is in an awkward
location (does it meet dimensional standards?). How will a wheel chair user get from this stall to a
building entrance?
See changes made to site plan. Breezeway is identified. Handicapped accessible space
will be developed by turning garage into usable space with access from what is now the
NW garage door. Handicapped access off of the space north of the existing garage
space is not optimal with use of the existing 1312 drive.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcQOv.com Topic:
General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated:
07/02/2014
07/02/2014: Irrigation plans are required no laterthan at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans
must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(1) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions
concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington,
970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: The existing water service to the property is a 3/4" service connecting to the water main in
College.
Irrigation plans to be provided at building permit application.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: The sewer service to the property connects to the sanitary sewer in the alley to the east of
the site
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: If there are no changes to thee existing water sewer services, there are no comments at this
time.
Existing 1" water service was replaced with City's North College project.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Gary Lopez, 970*416*2338, glopez@fcgov.com Topic:
Building Elevations
Comment Number:1 Comment Originated:
06/30/2014
06/30/2014: Please show elevations of the proposed Porte Cochere extention.
07/18/2014: Please provide a design for the water quality mitigation and Liu treatment required for the
new impervious area.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number:1 Comment Originated:
07/14/2014
07/14/2014: Please remove "For" from the sub -title. See redlines.
See changes made to site plan.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated:
07/14/2014
07/14/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
See changes made to site plan.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
07/14/2014
07/14/2014: Please rotate all marked text 180 degrees. See redlines.
See changes made to site plan.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcqov.com Topic:
Site Plan
Comment Number:1 Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014: Internal circulation is hard to decipher. Please provide more information on where
vehicles will access site (shared drive, alley etc?) and how they will move around the site. The pass
through appears very narrow.
Shared drive concept has been abandoned. Applicant meeting scheduled with Mrs. Wilkinson on
8/15/14.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014: The shared driveway off College Avenue needs to function as an appropriate high volume
drive that accesses a state highway. If it's being used for 2-way traffic, it would need to accommodate 2-
way traffic for at least some distance from street.
Shared drive concept has been abandoned. Applicant meeting scheduled with Mrs. Wilkinson on
8/15/14.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014: Transportation Planning staff notes that the sidewalk along College needs improvements -
although it can likely stay attached much like other properties in the area, it will need to be widened.
Shared drive concept has been abandoned. Applicant meeting scheduled with Mrs. Wilkinson on
8/15/14.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014: Transportation Planning staff notes thatintemal pedestrian circulation is unclear. Where is
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number:1
Comment Originated:
07/17/2014
07/17/2014:
A house changing occupancy to commercial must apply for a building permit and the building code
requires the building meet current code in some aspects. For details contact Russ at 416-2341.
Building permit applications will be filed for on receipt of land use approvals.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: DougMartine, 970-224-6152, dmartine@fcgov.com Topic:
General
Comment Number:1
Comment Originated:
06/30/2014
06/30/2014: The existing electric service provides for up to 150 amps. If additional electric service capacity
is needed, please coordinate with Light & Power Engineering at (970)221-6700.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, ilvnxwiler@poudre-fire.ors Topic:
General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: Per Fire Marshal, Bob Poncelow, existing fire access and water supply are appropriate for this
site. No further comment.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischlam@fcaov.com Topic:
Erosion Control
Comment Number:1
Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials
need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria
under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials
Submitted dose not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and
an Escrow/ Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any
questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ ischlam@fcgov.com
The entire site consists of 13,056 square feet of area. The existing house/garage footprint is 2,800+,
the existing grass garden area shown on the site plan and making up the front yard is not to be
disturbed in the front of the house (consisting of approx. 3,000 sq. ft.) is not to be disturbed; far
less than 10,000 sq. ft. of disturbed area will exist with this project. The basis of the comment is
unclear.
Contact: WesLamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarsue@fcgov.com Topic:
General
Comment Number:
07/18/2014
Comment Originated:
Aerial evaluation by Kincaid was previously provided.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014:
The following is the tree inventory information that could be placed on the plan.
Number Species location Size Condition
#1 Lanceleaf Cottonwood SE 64 inch dia fair to good Preserve/evaluate
#2 Spruce east spruce 16 inch dia fair Preserve
#3 Spruce middle spruce 28 inch dia Fair to good Preserve
#4 Spruce west spruce 20inch dia Fair Preserve/evaluate
#5 Ash S.street tree 4inch dia dying remove/replace
#6 Walnut n, street tree 11 inch dia dead remove/replace
#7 A. elm and S. elm (8) north thicket 2-12inch dia poor remove/wild origin
The existing #2 Spruce is the least healthy of the three southerly boundary trees and may be eliminated in the
future to provide additional parking The Forester previously approved this in conjunction with the prior
application byJoshi Pass. Mitigation would be required.
Comment Number: 5
07/16/2014
07/16/2014:
Comment Originated:
The border around the spruces to retain along the south boundary should minimize any root
excavation. It would be good to specify how that would be done. The permeable pavers used are
very good treatment over roots. Minimizing any excavation into the root system will be an important
part of their installation.\
Tree root interference/excavation will be minimized. Concerns with interference relative to
the #3 and #4 spruce trees will be non-existent based on new parking scenario and
continued use of 1312 drive. As noted, #2 Spruce may be removed, until removed root impacts will be
taken into account.
Department: Historical Preservation
Contact: Karen McWilliams, 970-224-6078, kmcwilliams@fcqov.com Topic:
General
Comment Number:1 Comment Originated:
07/07/2014
07/07/2014: This property currently is under consideration by the Landmark Preservation Commission and
Council for Fort Collins Landmark designation. The property has previously been found to be eligible for
local designation for both its architecture and historical associations. The property is also likely to be
eligible for listing on both the State and National Registers
State and National historical has been applied for
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/07/2014
07/07/2014: The plans have been reviewed for compliance with Section 3.4.7 of the Land Use Code,
and for compliance with the criteria in Section 14-48 of the City Code, which includes the Secretary of
the Interior's Standards. The plans comply with all applicable standards.
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fceov.com
Understood. Trie 1312 curb cut will remain. The existing sidewalk in place along s. College is 4' wide.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: For the driveway closure:
The applicant will need to get an access permit from CDOT for the closure (no cost).
The driveway cut would need to be replaced along College Ave with vertical curb and gutter.
The shared drive concept has been abandoned, it is understood that no access permit will be required for
continued use of 1312 drive, this will be confirmed with Martina Wilkinson.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: For the shared driveway:
CDOT would need to issue a new permit for the additional traffic to the existing access. The permit
would be written to both property owners unless there's an easement or some other kind of document
ensuring that the new business would have access.
The shared drive concept has been abandoned, it is understood that no change of access joint access
permit will be required for continued use of 1312 drive, this will be confirmed with Martina Wilkinson.
Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-
224-6143, lex@fcoov.com Topic: General
Comment Number:1 Comment Originated:
07/11/2014
07/11/2014: No comments.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number:1
07/16/2014
07/16/2014:
Comment Originated:
The two street trees that are dead and dying are described as being removed and replaced. Two
skyline Honeylocust 2.0 inch caliper could be labeled on the plan as the replacement trees.
Will identify trees to be planted at later time, trees to be chosen from City approved list.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014:
Add the tree protection specifications found in LUC 3.2.1 G1-7
See site plan
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014:
Please provide a copy to the City Forester and project planner of the written aerial tree evaluation with
recommendations that was discussed at the site meeting for the Cottonwood at the southeast corner
and west most spruce.The aerial evaluation should be conducted by a licensed and certified arborist
using a bucket truck or climber to examine the upper portion of these trees. The report can be used to
determine what action should be taken on the spruce and cottonwood. If the spruce is recommended
for removal then planting a replacement spruce in that area would help keep the original planting
scheme.
After the evaluation is complete the action that would be taken on these two trees can be finalized on
the plan and its tree inventory.
r
further landscaping detail has been included.
Comment Number: 5
07/16/2014
Comment Originated:
07/16/2014: Please show the pedestrian paths from the parking lot areas to entrances. This should
include the breeze way.
Parking areas have been modified based on the agreement that the 1312 drive will be retained.
Parking at the southeast corner of the property is intended for employees who will access the
property through the rear door at the south side of the breeze way or by passing through the
breezeway.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number:1 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: If the project is to be called March, Olive and Pharris LLC Law Offices then the plans need to
contain this name as well. The project name and that contained on the plans needs to be consistent.
See changes made to site plan.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: Additional right-of-way needs to be dedicated along the frontage of the property. I don't
know exactly how much is to be dedicated, but want right-of-way so that there is 17 feet from the
existing flowline of the street. The distance allows for the future parkway and detached sidewalk that is a
part of the college avenue cross section.
Additional 17' from flow line is shown on site plan.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: The existing sidewalk is narrow and can either be widened by adding onto this sidewalk
(minimum addition is 4 feet in width) or the sidewalk can be detached along the property's frontage
(6 foot detached). Either wa y we can work the sidewalk around the existing trees.
The water meter pit at the southerly intersection of the 1312 drive and College Avenue is being
relocated by the city, 3' to 6' further south. This allows the sidewalk to be widened by adding 2'
south of the existing drive and avoids interference with the 1312 drive lane. See changes
made to site plan.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: The shared driveway. Is this to be considered a one-way driveway? If not will probably
need to widen the driveway some. Need an access that works and as shown the driveway is narrow
for a 2-way driveway. The standard for a 2-way driveway is 24 feet minimum. What is the driveway
width and what can be achieved? It is not very clear how the access will work and the parking for this
site and the adjacent site will be accessed.
As outlined, the shared drive concept has been abandoned.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated:
07/15/2014
07/15/2014: Add the following note to the site plan.
Damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks, curbs
and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or
restored in like kind at the Developer's expense prior to the acceptance of completed improvements
and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The limits of the repairs will be
identified in the field by the City Engineering Inspector prior to and over the course of the project and
will not be shown on the plans.
MARCH, OLIVE & PHARRIS, LLC
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
J. BRADFORD MARCH 110 E. OAK STREET, SUITE 200
ARTHUR E. MARCH
I908_I981
SPEWART W. OLIVE FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524-2880
ARTHUR E. MARCH, JR.
JOHN W. PHARRIS
(970) 482-4322
Retired, 2002
Fax (970) 482-5719
August 14, 2014
Noah Beals
Project Planner, Senior Planner -Zoning
Community Development nbeals@fcgov.com
PO Box 580
Fort Coilins, CO 80522
RE: March, Olive, & Pharris, LLC Law Offices, MaOlPh, LLC
1312 S. College Avenue
Dear Mr. Beals,
This letter is accompanied by revisions to the site plan previously submitted to your office and intended to be revised in
accord with your July 18, 2014, 1" review letter. The comments contained in the letter are addressed below to the
degree they have not been clearly addressed on the site plan. As you now parking issues have been particularly
problematic with this project. I understand that the City has determined that the use of the existing 1312 S. College
drive will be allowed notwithstanding the 1978 recorded agreement. I have addressed this with Mrs. McCrery, the
owner to the south and I have spoken with Paul about the potential of an amendment to that agreement to address
the City Attorney's concerns. I have addressed concerns related to access below and have a meeting with Martina
tomorrow to insure that traffic/engineering is ok with the revisions. I gather from Cameron that this matter is slated
for administrative review and that a neighborhood meeting will not be required. Assuming that issues have been
addressed we would like to get the matter to a hearing officer sooner vs. later. We will get you any additional filings
you may need. If, after review of the letter and site plan, if you feel issues have been addressed, if you could schedule
the matter in before the hearing officer it would be appreciated.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: I
Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/14/2014: The trash enclosure needs to be designed with walk-in access without having to open
the main service gate and located on a concrete pad at least 20ft from a public sidewalk.
There is some potential that the owner of the 1318 College Avenue property will allow the joint
use of the current trash enclosure. If this does not prove workable any trash enclosure built on
the 1312 site will meet the outlined standards.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
07/16/2014
07/16/2014: A land use table should be included on the site plan indicating the existing use and the
new proposed use and a parking table (both vehicle and bicycle spaces).
A table has been included on the site plan.
Comment Number: 4
07/16/2014
Comment Originated:
07/16/2014: Is this a combined site and landscape plan? If so the landscaping should be included.
In accord with initial conversations, this is intended as a combined site and landscape plan,
r