HomeMy WebLinkAboutA - Z PARTY RENTAL - PDP - 11-99 - CORRESPONDENCE -PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Plannine
DATE: June 14, 1999 TO: Forestry
PROJECT: #11-99 A-Z Party Rental, Type I - LUC
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, July 14, 1999
�iAdal Ga�� 11 Cva iec�+¢v Sic<esS (4UOU"v"�a.t
`I L�GIHSINj �J^G�c '}O�^U ��4s
T�
V\
�c�ee
P y
L4c1)CsyGti4 ��G �i<1¢Pn
p R MU
AUG 0 4 1999 D
Date: %— 2-6-Signature: D
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other I&
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins
61
Definitions
Effective Model — The model that is currently in use by the City and/or FEMA
and from which the published values have been obtained.
Duplicate Effective Model — The model that is obtained from the City or FEMA's
contractor and run on the consultant's computer without any changes to the
modeling parameters (i.e. n-values, encroachments, expansion/contraction
coefficients, topography, etc.). There should be no differences between the
effective model and the duplicate effective model results. This will ensure
that this is the correct version of the model.
Corrected Effective Model — This model includes only those changes for which
there were errors in the modeling of the effective model or if better (i.e. more
detailed) topographic mapping is available. Changes as a result of the
proposed project should not be included in the model. However, if cross -
sections need to be added for the proposed project model in order to
accurately represent the proposed project, then these cross -sections should be
added to the corrected effective model. A corrected effective model that is
FENIA by either the City or FEA becomes the new effective model (base-
line condition). Therefore, the proposed project will be compared to the
corrected effective model to determine compliance with criteria.
Proposed Project Model — The model that incorporates all changes due to the
proposed project. This includes any new structures, bridges, streets, culverts,
parking lots, berms, etc.; modeling parameter changes, grading changes, etc.
8
X. F000dproofina - If floodproofing a building, describe and show drawings of
floodproofing technique, catalog cuts, manufacturer specs, etc. and include any
necessary calculations. If the floodproofing is not permanent (i.e. requires human
intervention) describe: Where will closures, shields, etc. be stored? Whose
responsibility is it to insure closure? What kind of maintenance is required?
Please prepare a brief emergency response plan.
XI. Bed and Bank Stabilization — Describe any bed and bank stabilization measures
that were used in the project (ex. Riprap, drop structures, grade control, bank
protection fabric, etc.).
XH. Compliance with Criteria - Is all criteria being met? — elevation, floodproofing,
critical facilities, tie-in of upstream and downstream WSEL, no impact to
structures in FEMA floodplains when modifying a floodway, easements from all
affected property owners in FEMA and City designated floodplains, floodway
criteria, street criteria, blockage criteria, etc.
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Duplicate Effective Condition
• ModelInput/Output
• Water Surface Profiles
• Cross -Section Plots
Appendix B — Corrected Effective Condition (if applicable)
• ModelInput/Output
• Water Surface Profiles
• Cross -Section Plots
Appendix C — Proposed Project Condition
• ModelInput/Output
• Water Surface Profiles
• Cross -Section Plots
Back Pocket of Report
• All Maps 24" X 36" (duplicate effective, corrected effective, proposed
project)
• Computer disks with all models (HEC, SWMM, Extran, Digital Floodplain
Map, etc.)
Digital Files for Chanties to the Floodplain Mappinti - If there are changes
to the floodplain as a result of the project or as a result of a corrected
effective condition, then a digital copy (ARC/INFO or AutoCAD) of the
floodplain map must be produced that ties in with the existing digital
floodplain map.
IV. Emergency Response/Worst-Case Scenario - What is the worst -case scenario for
this structure and surrounding areas (emergency response component). If the
project includes a bridge, assume the bridge is completely blocked, and answer in
your best judgement "Where does the water go?". This should include, at a
minimum, a qualitative analysis if a quantitative analysis can not be provided.
Each project will need to be evaluated by City staff to determine if there are any
emergency response or worst -case scenario questions that need to be answered.
V. Changes in WSEL - Any changes in WSEL for any frequency storm that is
modeled should be discussed in the text. Best interpretation of why the change is
occurring should also be discussed.
VI. Floodway — Does this floodplain have a mapped floodway?. If modifying a
FEMA floodway, either a 0-rise criteria must be met or a CLOMR must be
submitted to FEMA. If there is not a floodway mapped (either in a FEMA or City
designated floodplain), then there is a 0-rise floodplain criteria (rounded to the
nearest tenth of a foot). If modifying a City designated floodway, any impacts to
upstream or downstream property owners will require easements. Does the
project meet this criteria? Please document the notification and that easements
that were obtained. _
VII. Impact on Structures - There cannot be any increase in WSEL on structures in the
100-year FEMA designated floodplain if modifying a FEMA floodway. All
impacts are based on rounding to 0.1 ft. Any impact to a structure in a City
designated floodplain without a floodway will require obtaining an easement from
the property owner. Also, if a City designated floodway is modified, an easement
from the impacted property owner will be required. Please document the
notification and that easements that were obtained.
VM. Upstream or Downstream Impacts to Properties- Are there any upstream or
downstream impacts to other properties? (Applies to FEMA floodplains when
modifying the floodway and City designated floodplains when modifying the
floodway or in City designated'floodplains without a floodway) If so, property
owners must be notified and easements obtained. Please document the
notification and that easements that were obtained.
DC. Mitigation -Are there any mitigation measures being incorporated in the project?
Please describe.
6
• All cross -sections shown in HEC-2 (at least one cross-section
upstream and downstream of the affected area) with cross-section
numbering
•. Water surface elevations (rounded to nearest foot)
• Property boundaries
• All structures and roads including names of roads
• Stream names
• Vertical datum and benchmark number and elevation used.
• Scale and north arrow
ID. Corrected Effective vs Proposed Project or Duplicate Effective vs. Proposed
Project
A. Text - Compare the two conditions and explain the differences.
F. Tables — Include a table (or multiple tables if necessary) within the, text
comparing WSEL, floodway, and velocities for all cross -sections -- not
just published cross -sections. If cross -sections were added as part of the
corrected effective condition, an interpolated WSEL should be included
for the same cross-section in the duplicate effective model. See FIS for
example of format — HEC 2 Summary Table 200 — FIA Table 1. Tables
can be located in the appendices if referred to in the text.
B. Model Input and Output — Include a copy of the proposed project model
input and output in Appendix C.
C. Figures - Include for the proposed project condition, plots of the water
surface profiles and cross-section for all cross -sections in the study area in
Appendix C.
D. Maps — Include a copy of the proposed project condition in -back pocket of
report. Map should be 24" x 36" or similar size based on original mapping
(I inch = 400 ft. minimum). Include the following information on the map
when producing new maps:
• Topographic contours (proposed contours)
• Spot elevations used to develop cross -sections
• Floodplain delineation
• All cross -sections shown in HEC-2 (at least one cross-section
upstream and downstream of the affected area) with cross-section
numbering
• Water surface elevations (rounded to nearest foot)
• Property, boundaries
• Proposed project
• All structures and roads including names of roads
• Minimum opening elevation for proposed structures or any potentially
impacted structures
• Stream names
• Vertical datum and benchmark number and elevation used.
• Scale and north arrow
5
C. Model Input and Output — Include a copy of the duplicate effective model
input and output in Appendix A.
D. Figures - Include for the duplicate effective condition, water surface
profiles and cross-section plots for all cross -sections in the study area in
Appendix A.
E. Maps — Include a copy of the effective condition map (Master Plan or
FEMA Work Map) in back pocket of report. Map should be 24" x 36" or
similar size based on original mapping (1 inch = 400 ft. minimum). Include
the following information on the map when producing new maps:
• ,Topographic contours (existing contours)
• Spot elevations used to develop cross -sections
• Floodplain delineation
• All cross -sections shown in HEC-2 (at least one cross-section
upstream and downstream of the affected area) with cross-section
numbering
• Water surface elevations (rounded to nearest foot)
• Property boundaries
• All structures and roads including names of roads
• Stream names
• Vertical datum and benchmark number and elevation used.
• Scale and north arrow
II. Duplicate Effective vs. Corrected Effective Condition
A. Text - Compare the two conditions and explain the differences.
B. Tables --Include a table (or multiple tables if necessary) within the text
comparing WSEL, floodway, and velocities for all cross -sections -- not
just published cross -sections. If cross -sections were added as part of the
corrected effective condition, an interpolated WSEL should be included
for the same cross-section in the duplicate effective model. See FIS for
example of format — HEC 2 Summary Table 200 — FIA Table 1. Tables
can be located in the appendices if referred to in the text.
C. Model Input and Output — Include a copy of the corrected effective model
input and output in Appendix B.
D. Figures - Include for the corrected effective condition, water surface
profiles and cross-section plots for all cross -sections in the study area in
Appendix B.
E. Maps — Include a copy of the corrected effective condition in back pocket
of report. Map should be 24" x 36" or similar size based on original
mapping (finch = 400 ft. minimum). Include the following information on
the map when producing new maps:
• Topographic contours (existing contours — use the more detailed
topographic data if that is the reason for doing a corrected effective
model)
• Spot elevations used to develop cross -sections
• Floodplairi delineation
4
III. Vertical Datum - Should be using City's current Vertical Control (August 12,
1998). Please state benchmark number used and the elevation of that benchmark
on the City's datum.
IV. Models Used — Discuss the model version, date of model, developed flow model
or existing flow model, etc. (If running HEC-RAS, should use the HEC-2
default).
V. Additional Cross -Sections Added — If the proposed project is between cross -
sections, then cross -sections will need to be added to accurately reflect the
proposed project (i.e. new buildings, bridge, etc.). New cross -sections should be
added to the corrected effective model if a corrected effective model is created for
other reasons (i.e. better topographic mapping or correcting errors in original
modeling). If a corrected effective model is not done, then the WSEL for the new
cross-section for the effective condition can be interpolated. There should be a
WSEL for all cross -sections for both the effective or corrected effective condition
and proposed project condition unless the project prohibits determining a WSEL
at a particular cross-section. Discuss methods and include all WSELs (modeled or
interpolated) in the results.
VI. Changes in Modeling Parameters and Why Changed - Discuss any changes in
modeling parameters and explain why they were changed. (i.e. n-values,
encroachments, contraction/expansion coefficients, etc.)
VII. Compensatory Storage - Explain how compensatory storage is calculated — this is
required in non -conveyance zones or storage areas for floodplains that do not
have a floodway in order to show that water displaced by the project is not
impacting upstream or downstream property owners.
VHL Discharges and Modeled Frequencies
A. Discharges- Provide a table showing discharges for 10, 50, 100, and 500-
year flows at all cross -sections. Include a table for existing and modified
discharges if applicable. (This is for documentation purposes only)
B. Frequencies - The frequencies to be modeled are as follows: 100-year at a
minimum, 500-year if the project is a critical facility, and 10- and 50-year
if it is determined that there is a downstream impact caused by the project.
Chapter 3 - Results/Discussion
I. Effective vs. Duplicate Effective Condition
A. Text - Compare the two conditions even if there is no change.
B. Tables — Include a table within the text comparing WSEL, floodway, and
velocities for all cross -sections not just published cross -sections. See FIS
for example of format — HEC 2 Summary Table 200 — FIA Table 1
General Report Outline
The following is considered to be the minimum information necessary to be included in
the text of any Foodplain modeling report submitted to the City. Each item listed should
be addressed. If the item is not applicable, please simply state "not applicable." Specific
projects may require additional information.
Chapter 1 - Background
I. Proiect Area Description
Floodplain — name, description, FIS map panel #, date of FIS, etc.
City Stormwater Basin — state applicable master plan, date
Location — nearby streets
Characteristics of study area — vegetation, channel planform, banks,
channel stability, etc.
Map of area — vicinity map
H. Flooding History - basin as well as site -specific, if information is available. The
City of Fort Collins Floodplain Management Plan has a brief description of
historic flooding for each one of the basins and can be used as a reference. The
City also has high water mark information (photos and field forms) for many
areas impacted by the 1997 flood that can be used for site -specific information.
Property owners are also a good reference for site -specific information.
III. Previous Studies — discuss any previous Master Planning reports, Master Plan
updates, Flood Insurance Studies, Map Revisions, other pertinent development
reports, etc.
IV. Project Description — describe all aspects of the project in detail. Describe the
land -use (i.e., commercial, residential, and/or critical facility— school, hospital,
nursing home, gas station, quick lube, police station, fire station, hazardous
materials storage, etc.).
Chapter 2 - Analysis
I. Purpose and Scope - Describe the Purpose and Scope of the project. List all tasks
associated with the analysis.
II. Methods and Approach - Describe methods/approach for modeling all conditions.
Duplicate effective — use the exact parameters that are included in the
model.
Corrected effective — Explain why a corrected effective model is needed
and the techniques used. A meeting with the City upon completion
of this model run is required.
Proposed project - Explain how the proposed project is incorporated into
the model. Include all modeling techniques that have changed from
the effective model.
April 19, 1999
Guidelines for Submitting Floodplain Modeling Reports
To the City of Fort Collins
These guidelines are to be used to assist in the review of floodplain modeling reports. By
establishing these guidelines, the City hopes to streamline the review process and give
consultants a framework of expectations that need to be met in order to gain approval for
a project. These guidelines are not an attempt to replace the FEMA requirements for
submitting CLOMRs and LOMRs, but are offered to assist in the City's review of both
FEMA designated floodplain projects and City designated floodplain projects. FEMA
designated floodplains include: Dry Creek, the Poudre River, Boxelder, Cooper Slough,
and Spring Creek. City designated floodplains include: Old Town, West Vine, Fossil
Creek, or any of the smaller channels defined in the City's Master Plans. If a variance is
being requested, please see Chapter 10 of the City Code for specific requirements.
Floodplain modeling reports are required when:
1. Attempting to develop in a designated floodway and thus needing to meet no -
rise criteria.
2. Attempting to develop in floodplains that do not have a floodway and thus the
entire floodplain has a no -rise criteria (i.e., Old Town, Fossil Creek, Boxelder
Creek, and portions of Cooper Slough).
3. Attempting to develop in a known flood hazard area that has not been
previously mapped.
4. CLOMR and LOMR submittals.
5. Other -unique special hazard projects -
The Floodplain Modeling Report should be a separate document from the Drainage
Report.
An initial meeting concerning the proposed project is required with the City's -
Floodplain Administrator and Master Planning Engineer before any modeling work
begins. This allows the consultant and the City to discuss the project, the required
approach, models to be used, etc. The City is also willing to meet with the consultant
during the analysis phase to discuss any questions that may arise. This will hopefully
assist in a streamlined analysis and City review process.
3. The swale with the trickle pan that runs on the north side of the side is a concern.
Please smooth out the +90 degree turn in the northwest corner to direct the flow. The
grading around the east end of the pan does not make sense and appears to encroach
into the 40' drainage easement. Please revise the grading and provide cross -sections
that indicate the flows can be handled, including the freeboard.
RESPONSE:
4. Please show the proposed grading on the drainage plan.
RESPONSE:
5. Please provide profile views for each of the detention pond outlets, including their
size, type, slope, length, cover, and HGL. Will the outlets require riprap? Currently,
riprap is shown on the pond side of the outlet. Why? If needed, please provide
riprap, call out all dimensions and provide riprap details.
RESPONSE:
6. Please add concentration points to the drainage plans.
RESPONSE:
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments
1. The plan is OK as submitted. Thank you.
Please refer to redlined plans and report for additional review comments.
AZpartyl .doc
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 14, 1999 TO: Stormwater Utility
PROJECT: # 11-99 A-Z Party Rental, Type I - LUC
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, July 14, 1999
l . The outfall that exists directly north of the site is known to carry a large amount of
flow. According to a hydrology update that is currently being worked on (but not
completed) by the Master Planning Department, the flows from this outfall are in
excess of 550 cfs. It is anticipated that these large flows will cause localized
flooding. Therefore, a floodplain analysis of these flows will be needed. A copy of
the Guidelines for Submitting Floodplain Modeling Reports to the City of Fort
Collins is attached for guidance. There are a few options that could be taken to
mitigate the flooding potential for this site. Please contact Donnie Dustin (416-7521)
to schedule a meeting to discuss these issues.
RESPONSE:
Due to the proximity of this site to the total outfall for the regional drainage basin, the
two detention ponds will not be necessary. However, water quality will still need to
be addressed at the site. Therefore, please provide water quality measures at the site,
including the calculations for the water quality capture volume, outlet structure, etc.
Also, please provide details of the outlet structures in the plans and include a section
on water quality in the text of the report.
RESPONSE:
Date: l t Signature:
(L! j rr
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
lat ite rainage Report Other
_)�Rility �iedline Utility 'yLandscape City of of Fort Collins I
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 14, 1999 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: #11-99 A-Z Party Rental, Type I - LUC
PLANNER: Gen. Troy Jones
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: <Date> (711`11YF)
❑ No Problems
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
General Comments:
• A soils report was not received for this development.
• A traffic impact analysis was not received for this development. The traffic impact analysis
should address the frequency of truck traffic to and from this site.
• This development is required to dedicate an additional 7.5' of right-of-way (for a total half
street width of 57.5') and provide for a 15' utility easement along Riverside Avenue per our
arterial street standard.
Site Plan:
• Please indicate on the plan how an SU-30 vehicle can maneuver on -site to back into the truck
dock (this should not show SU-30 vehicles backing into the driveway from Riverside
Avenue.)
• What is the function of the (assumed) three parking spaces on the northwest corner of the
site? The stall depth appears to be insufficient. A joint access easement appears to be
needed, provided by the property to the north.
Utility Plans:
• Replace all occurrences of "Director of Engineering" with "City Engineer".
• Add "Traffic Engineer" to the signature block approval.
• The patterned colored concrete across the driveway is not allowed. If this affect is desired it
should be relocated outside of public right-of-way. Provide a detail on how the ramps shown
will be incorporated into the new driveway approach detail.
r/ (see plans for any additional comments)
Date: / /z ` Ar
Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES b�'PLAT
OF MARKED REVISIONS: f SITE ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS
1l UTILITY
1Y LANDSCAPE
PROJECT
(who
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 14, 1999 TO: Building Inspections
PROJECT: #11-99 A-Z Party Rental, Type I - LUC
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, July 14, 1999
With limited information I believe that rated occupancy
separation walls may be necessary in this project. Also openings in
these walls would have to be rated. Some attention to interior
storage of hazardous material might also effect the project's final
design. This project may also require accessible toilet rooms in
accordance with ANSI 117.1.
Date: 2 ! Signature: P-te p LsE h-,)kL Y,.5 .
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
Utility Redline Utility _Landscape
/ M1
City of Fort Collins
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 14, 1999 TO: PFA
PROJECT: #11-99 A-Z Party Rental, Type I - LUC
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, July 14, 1999
bui aing is out or access ana shall be fire sprinkiered.
AllLl(L' JJ 1V UMEKALS
Address numerals snaii be visibie from the street fronting the property, and posted with a
minimum orb inch numerais on a contrasting backgrouna. kisronze numerais on brown
brick are not acceptable).
isuMLIE14lT ANEA:
1 he proposed bunding exceeds 5000 square teet for type V construction and must be tire
contained or rire sprinkiered.
WAlEli JtIYYLY
fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing or ovv reef along an approves
roadway. Each hydrant must be capable or delivering i5uv gaions or water per minute
at a residual pressure of20 psi.. Hydrants snail be or an approved type as derived by the
water department and the tire department. No commercial Dunning can ue greater
than -vu feet from a lire hydrant.
rinox isbz roiicy
roudre Fire Authority requires a - &nox box'" to be mounted on the front or every new
building equipped with a requred tire sprinter system or lire aiarm system.
:5 Date: 6.4a Signature.
�—
SHUA LER xr.QuucrJiv EN iS:
Ties proposed building ski be fire sprinkiered
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat ✓ite _Drainage Report _Other
Utility Redline Utility _Landscape
I&
City of Fort Collins
_ 3 DEPT. COMMENT SHEET
ZONI,
Project: 11-99 A-Z PARTY RENTAL TYPE 1 LUC
Date: June 24 1999
No.
Comment:
LUC Section
Reviewer
1
Remove topo lines from final site plan
Jenny
2
Provide ramp at HC spaces & hatched out area for ramped area (GL).
Jenny,
3
Not sure what "use" to categorize as for max parking space
determination. It's probably general retail, which would then allow
them up to 40 parking spaces.
Jenny
4
Provide trash enclosure elevations, fence and retaining wall elevations
jenny
5
Only one HC space required if you want to delete one.
Gary
6
Indicate buidling colors
Peter
7
The 3 parking spaces on the northwest side of building are accessed
from a lot that's not part of this PDP. They'll need and easement
Peter
8
They show no outdoor storage area. Is that correct? If they are going
to have outdoor storage, they'll need to show on plan.
Peter
isPROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Plannine
DATE: June 14, 1999 TO: Zoning
PROJECT: #11-99 A-Z Party Rental, Type I - LUC
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, July 14, 1999
Date: 6 " d q - a 9 Signature: A t� /�Ytt 46f 14_
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report _Other
Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
in
Citv of Fort Collins
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 14,1999
PROJECT
COMMENT
SHEET
TO: Transportation Planning
PROJECT: #11-99 A-Z Party Rental, PDP - Type 1 - LUC
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, July 14,1999
The only real concern that I have is the lack of the Transportation Impact Statement. This
is generally required of all development proposals except when the peak hour trip
generation of the proposed project is less than 50 trips. But they need to show the
estimated number of trips and how they arrived at this conclusion so we can evaluate
traffic circulation and the impact on the surrounding street network.
Date: '7 -/'/- 15 Signature:
PROJECT
City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET
Current Planning
DATE: June 14, 1999 DEPT: Water & Wastewater
PROJECT: #11-99 A-Z Party Rental, Type I - LUC
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, July 14, 1999
➢ Has the existing water main on north side of this project been field located?
Original plans for this main show it on the north side of the easement. Field
verify its location and provide for a 10 foot wide utility easement on either side
of main. Show, label and provide documentation for any extra easement
necessary for water main.
➢ Provide 10 feet of separation between thrust block on fire line and water service.
➢ Our records indicate that a sanitary sewer service may exist in the existing
manhole located in the proposed drive. Field verify and use this service or
abandon at the main.
➢ See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Date: 7> 14f,%> Signature: ki 7
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF RiQSIONS
X PLAT X SITE _DRAINAGE REPORT _OTHER
X UTILITY X REDLINE UTILITY X LANDSCAPE
in
City of Fort Collins
direct result of the on -site lighting. Please submit a lighting plan to show compliance
with these standards.
j. All signage must comply with Section 3.8.7 of the LUC. Contact Peter Barnes in the
Zoning Department for questions about the sign code.
k. An additional 15 feet of ROW is required along Riverside. This will put the current
location of the building in noncompliance with Section 4.23(E)(2) of the LUC, which
requires a minimum thirty-foot deep landscaped yard along all arterial streets. You will
need to move the building back away from Riverside to satisfy this requirement, once the
new ROW has been dedicated.
1. This site is prone to flooding. Now that the new rainfall numbers have been adopted for
the city, the flood area is much larger than it once was for this site. You need to show
what the floodplain is with the new rainfall data. It is possible that this will make the site
undevelopable.
m. You will need to show a joint access easement that allows access from the adjacent site to
the three parking spaces on the north. These three spaces also need a 6 foot pedestrian
connection out to the street sidewalk.
Please provide a written response to each of the above comments with the submittal of plan
revisions. In addition, a revised site development plan drawn to scale which is clearly dated and
labeled shall be submitted to address the above. Further, LUC Section 2.2.11 requires and
establishes a 90-day time frame to submit revisions to the Current Planning Department or
the development application becomes null and void. A 30 day extension is available to this
90 day time frame upon the Director's approval.
If you have any questions about these or any other issues related to this project please feel free to
call be at 221-6750.
ours truly,
Tr y W. Jones
City Planner
10. U.S. Post Office:
a. OK
11. TCI:
a. OK.
12. US West:
a. I have not received any comments from US West, but when I do, I will forward them on
to you.
13. Building Inspection:
a. See the attached Building Inspection comment sheet.
14. Light & Power:
a. Developer will need to contact Light and Power to coordinate power requirements and
costs.
15. Park Planning:
a. See the attached comment sheet.
16. Park Planning, Forestry, Police, Advanced Planning, Right of Way Planning, Transfort,
Pavement Engineering, Mapping and Drafting, Poudre RI Schools, and Street
Oversizing:
a. I'm still waiting on comments from these departments.
17. Current Planning:
a. Per Section 3.2.1(13)(2)(b) of the Land Use Code (LUC), canopy shade trees must be
placed between 3 and 7 feet behind the street sidewalk at 30 foot to 40 foot spacing.
Your design shows 3 Marshall's Seedless Ashes which qualify as canopy shade trees, but
they are too far from the sidewalk. The Austrian Pines shown on the landscape plan are
not canopy shade trees. Contact Tim Buchanan, the city forester for clarification about
which species are canopy shade trees.-
b. Per Section 3.2.1(E)(5) of the LUC, 6% of the interior space of your parking lot must be
made up of landscaped areas.
c. Per Section 3.2.1(D)(1)(c) of the LUC, "full tree stocking" is required in all landscape
areas within 50 feet of the building.
d. Per Section 3.2.2(C)(4) of the LUC, a bike rack must be provided near the building
entrance to accommodate at least 2 bicycles.
e. Per Section 3.2.2(C)(5)(a) of the LUC, a 6 foot wide sidewalk must link the street
sidewalk with the building entrance.
f. Per Section 3.2.2(C)(8) of the LUC, a Transportation Impact Study (TIS) must be
submitted. Contact Eric Bracke in the Streets Department for the scope of this study.
g. Per Section 3.2.2(K)(6), please specify the maximum size of truck that is anticipated to
be using the loading dock. It appears that the configuration of the lot would preclude
large tractor trailers from being able to back up into the loading dock area. If you intend
to accommodate tractor trailers, please diagram how this will work.
h. Per Section 3.2.2(K)(5)(d) of the LUC, you are only required to have one handicap
parking space.
i. Per Section 3.2.4(D)(7) & (8), maximum on site lighting levels shall not exceed 10 foot
candles except in loading dock areas where it shall not exceed 20 foot candles. Light
levels measured 20 feet beyond the property line shall not exceed 0.1 foot candles as a
Comm. ty Planning and Environmental rvices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Steve Forbs
3767 Bromley Dr,
Fort Collins, CO 80525
July 21, 1999
Staff reviewed the Submittal of the A-Z Party Rental, and would like to offer the following
comments:
COMMENTS:
1. Water and Sewer Utility Department:
a. See the attached comment sheet from Water/Wastewater.
2. Stormwater Utility Department:
a. See the attached comment sheet from the Stormwater Department.
3. Traffic Operations:
a. A TIS was not submitted with the application, however it is required. Please provide a
TIS including but not limited to: the number of trips/day, and the number of trips during
the, peak hour.
b. Please provide sidewalk and bike connections.
4. Transportation Planning:
a. Please see the attached comment sheet from the Transportation Department.
5. Engineering Department:
a. Please see the attached comment sheet from the Engineering Department.
6. Zoning:
a. Please see the attached comment sheet from the Zoning Department.
7. Natural Resources:
a. Include an area for recycling in your trash enclosure design.
8. Poudre Fire Authority:
a. See the attached Poudre Fire Authority comment sheet.
9. Water Conservation:
a. OK
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020