The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPROMONTORY - PDP - 32-99 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 4 - REVISIONS4igi v'-w,• '1• - - ✓S�raAi�'-Y\°•. j` °"ik t'•: Sh y^na 'tsll°lpsf\�?�y1iQn fisS''e_s'r�'?°�Svwili?"+,'L'�+.r•s. �i 1 iYL Y 40. l y ! �tia kT hAN p� W C,4.44V W �ldYd0 1 j! vie- 1 A ^41414op ilk lit fie aE]• ex k4x �e El IS IY 1 .4 . 31. The site plan has been modified to refer to offices as "two story plus optional loft". 32. The alternative square footings for buildings 1, 2, and 3 will be accomplished horizontally, that is the same building character and design (two stories plus optional loft) however square footage expanded horizontally, not vertically. 33. Additional comments on site, landscape, and building elevation plans have been responded to in resubmittals of same. 34. Kindly set the matter for Planning and Zoning Hearing as soon as possible. Sincerel , J routy J P/kw Enclosures 14., 15, and 16. — Stormwater's Comments have been addressed in the resubmitted Utility Plans. Agreement from the Ditch Company has been achieved. 17., 18., and 19. — Engineering's Comments have been addressed in the resubmitted Utility Plans. Enhanced crosswalks and public right-of-way have been eliminated. Utilities have agreed to reduction of Boardwalk's 15 foot utility easement to 9 feet in conjunction with the blanket utility easement. 20. In response to Transportation Planning, the access walk previously provided to the south side of buildings A and B has been deleted because of a redesign of the building. It was decided for safety, access convenience and marketability that it was best to redesign all units so they have access from the front of the building. Accordingly no walks are necessary since no units have rear access anymore. 21. Applicant has spoken with Zoning about alternative parking space demarcation. See paragraph 3 above. 22. Parking Lot Screening and Residential Landscaping along the west property line have been added and enhanced. Furthermore, site plan has been expanded to show Post Office detention pond and open space which is adjacent to project to the west. 23. See paragraph 11 above. 24. FDP reference has been changed to PDP. 25. Advance Planning's suggestions have been considered and a revised Modification request submitted. 26. Parking has been clarified on the site plan and the residential is now indicated on the site plan with a "R" in each residential parking space. 27. A utility coordination meeting has been held. In addition applicant has met with all utilities one or more times. 28. Agreement with Ditch Company has been achieved and is being submitted. 29. See paragraphs 11 and 20 above. 30. Meeting about pedestrian circulation has taken place. In addition a pedestrian circulation plan has been prepared. 6. Current Planning and Advance Planning red line plans have been responded to in our resubmittal. 7. Applicant has met with Public Service. Public Service's requests will be added as notes to the Utility Plans. Public Service's agreement to the use of a blanket easement and reduction of the 15 foot utility easement along Boardwalk from 15 feet to 9 feet has been signed and is enclosed with the resubmittal. 8. Water/ Wastewater's Comments are addressed in resubmitted Utility Plans. 9. Stormwater's Comments are addressed in resubmitted Utility Plans. 10. Engineering's Comments are addressed in resubmitted Utility Plans and documents. 11.Applicant has met with Advance Planning. Advance Planning's support of the Modification is appreciated. The resubmitted Modification request takes into consideration the suggestions by Advance Planning. The best connection from this project and the general neighborhood to JFK is along the south side of ditch, average 45 feet wide with existing sidewalk adjacent to Troutman and the future potential of a sidewalk along the top of the large existing berm, which sidewalk can meander through a beautiful groove of seventeen large, mature shade trees. This is the preferred pedestrian connection to JFK from the standpoint of aesthetics, quality of experience, space, safety and path access. Transportation Planning agrees with and supports this view. The alternative potential pedestrian connection route along the north side of the ditch is narrow, passes through a 12 foot constraint area and is adjacent to a very ugly black 8 foot chain -link fence along the south side of the Post Office parking lot. "Map" and photos are enclosed. 12. Applicant has met with Transportation Planning. We appreciate Transportation Planning's recognition of the changes we have made to improve pedestrian circulation, parking lot auto / pedestrian separation and connectivity to street sidewalks, and their acknowledgement of the good results we have achieved. Regarding the question of the potential pedestrian connection to JFK - see paragraph 11 above. 13.Applicant has met with Mapping. Mapping's requests have been incorporated into the resubmitted Utility plans. The project's name has been changed from Park Place to Promontory with Mapping's approval. APR 1 2 2000 d April 11, 2000 Mr. Steve Olt City of Fort Collins Current Planning Department P. O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Re: Promontory PUD (previously Park Place) Dear Steve: In response to your Comments Letter dated March 15, 2000. (My responses correlate to your letter paragraphs.) 1. Modification being reviewed. Okay. 2. Applicant has met with Ditch Company and received their approval. 3. Applicant has met with Zoning about concerns about parking, alternate elevations, parking lot screening, landscape phasing, proposed residential sign locations, sight distance assurance, and plant list correction have been addressed in resubmittal. We will remove topography lines from final site plan when it is submitted. Alternative parking space demarcation by means of triple score lines will be the same as previously approved for zoning for Landings Bay and has been approved specifically with Zoning. 4. Applicant has met with Light and Power. Light and Power's concerns have been addressed in resubmitted Utility Plans. 5. Applicant has met with Poudre Fire Authority. The request for fire lane signage but no red curbs is included in the revised Modification request being submitted. This seems appropriate in light of the unique nature of this project — we do not want to go to the considerable effort of creating a successful central park — courtyard design only to detract from it aesthetically with red curbs. My understanding is that Poudre Fire Authority will support this modification because of the unique nature of the project, provided our Modification request is approved by P & Z, and provided that we coordinate with them for the satisfactory type and location of fire lane signs. 3307 South College Avenue, Suite 200, Fort Collins, CO 80525 - (970) 226-5000 • Fax (970) 226-5125