HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROMONTORY - PDP - 32-99 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEWb. Public transit service may soon be provided along Boardwalk Drive.
C. Pedestrian connections to adjacent properties and transportation
systems (including Troutman Parkway) must be provided.
d. Bicycle parking for both the residential and office portions of the
development must be provided in convenient, secure locations.
Please contact Kathleen, at 224-6140, if you have questions about these
comments.
8. If the residential portion of this project is going to comprise more than
25% of the development plan then a modification of the standard as set
forth in Section 4.22(D)(1) of the LUC must be requested, and this
request for a modification will make the development request a Planning
and Zoning Board (Type II) review.
9. A neighborhood meeting should be held for this project before a formal
development request is submitted to the City.
10. This development request will be subject to the Development Review Fee
Schedule that is available in the Current Planning Department office.
The fees are due at the time of submittal of the required documents for
the Overall Development Plan (if necessary), Project Development Plan,
and Final Compliance phases of development review by City staff and
affected outside reviewing agencies.
11. This development proposal is subject to the requirements as set forth in
the City's LUC, specifically Articles 2. Administration (Development
Review Procedures), Article 3. General Development Standards, and
Article 4. [Zoning] Districts.
b. The standard utility plans submittal requirements will apply to this
development request and a development agreement between the
developer and the City will be necessary. The development
agreement will be prepared by the Engineering Department near
the end of the City's review and approval process.
C. Street oversizing fees will apply to this development, with the fees
for multi -family residential being approximately $908.00 per
dwelling unit and the fees for office uses being approximately
$1.75 - $3.70 per square foot of building. Please contact Matt
Baker, at 224-6108.
d. This development will be responsible for improvements to
Boardwalk Drive and (possibly) Troutman Parkway, if it has any
frontage along Troutman.
e. Access points into this development should align with and be the
same widths as existing access points on the opposite sides of
adjacent streets.
f. A minimum of 200' (horizontal distance) should be maintained
between access points into this development and access points on
the opposite sides of adjacent streets, as well as to the Troutman
Parkway intersection.
Please contact Mark, at 221-6750, if you have questions about these
comments.
6. Janet Meisel -Burns of the Parks Planning Department stated that both
the neighborhood parkland and community/regional parkland fees will
apply to this proposed development (for the residential portion only) and
the fees will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits.
There may be some increase in these fees in 1999. The
community/regional parkland fee will go towards development of the
Fossil Creek Community Park that is approved.
7. Kathleen Reavis of the Transportation Planning Department offered the
following comments:
a. A TIS is required for this development proposal and it must
address all modes of transportation (vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian,
and public transit).
4. Glen Schlueter of the Stormwater Utility offered the following
comments:
a. The site is located within the McClelland/Mail Creek Basin, where
the new development fee is $3,717 per acre, subject to the runoff
coefficient. The inventory grid # is 8P.
b. The standard drainage and erosion control reports and plans are
required and they must be prepared by a professional engineer
registered in the State of Colorado.
C. The outfall ditch along the west property line needs to remain in its
present location or be routed through this development.
d. On -site detention is required and the HEART SID drainage report
may restrict the detention to 0.87 cfs/acre. If it is not part of that
area's requirements then the standard 2-year historic release rate
would apply.
e. Water quality needs to be addressed and extended detention is the
preferred method.
f. The multiple detention pond idea works good for water quality
extended detention, but Stormwater would caution you that each
pond should have a separate outlet. The problem with connecting
each pond directly with the upper one flowing through the lower
ones is that the water is detained several times so each of the
successive ponds needs to be larger.
g. The new precipitation rates will apply to this project.
Please contact Glen, at 221-6065, if you have questions about these
comments.
5. Mark McCallum of the Engineering Department offered the following
comments:
a. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) will be required for this
proposed development. The study must address the levels of
service for all forms of transportation; therefore, you should
contact Eric Bracke, at 224-6062, and Kathleen Reavis, at 224-
6140, to schedule a scoping meeting for the purpose of
determining the information required with your TIS.
2. Bruce Vogel of the Light & Power Department offered the following
comments:
a. There is an existing oval electric vault on Boardwalk Drive that can
be used to provide power to this development.
b. Light & Power wants to be on the interior, to the front of the units.
C. The site as shown on the concept plan would be very tight;
therefore, a utility coordination meeting should be held.
Please contact Bruce, at 221-6700, if you have questions about these
comments.
3. Roger Buffington of the Water/Wastewater Department offered the
following comments:
a. There is an existing 12" water main in Boardwalk Drive that can be
tapped into for services to this development. The water main
should be looped through this site.
b. There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main in Boardwalk Drive
that can be tapped into for services to this development.
C. This property is responsible for a repay for the Warren Lake Trunk
Sewer.
d. There are utility services to this property from Troutman Parkway
that must be abandoned back to the mains unless they are used
for this development.
e. The City's water conservation standards for landscaping and
irrigation systems will apply to this development.
f. Plant investment fees and water rights will apply to this
development and they will be due at the time of issuance of
building permits.
g. The site as shown on the concept plan would be very tight;
therefore, a utility coordination meeting should be held.
Please contact Roger, at 221-6681, if you have questions about these
comments.
DATE: December 14, 1998
ITEM: 4kgit Peint Office/Residential
APPLICANT: Jon Prouty
Lagunitas Company
3307 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
LAND USE DATA:
Request for a mixed -use development containing office and residential uses on
approximately 7.7 acres located on the south and west side of Boardwalk Drive
between Landings Drive and Troutman Parkway. The property is in the E -
Employment Zoning District.
COMMENTS:
Gary Lopez of the Zoning Department offered the following comments:
a. The property is in the E - Employment Zoning District. The
proposed office use is a permitted use in the District, subject to an
administrative (Type I) review. The proposed residential use would
be an administrative (Type I) review unless the residential portion
of the development were to exceed 25% of the development plan. If
that were the case, a request for a modification of a standard in the
Land Use Code ( UC) would be required, automatically turning the
development request into a Planning and Zoning Board (Type II)
review.
b. The property is in the Residential Neighborhood Sign District;
therefore, locations for all building signage must be shown on the
building elevations. Locations only, not size and content, must be
shown.
Please contact Gary, at 221-6760, if you have questions about these
comments.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO80522-0580 (970) 221-6750
CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Community Planning and Environmental Services
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
January 4, 1998
Jon Prouty
Lagunitas Company
3307 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Jon,
For your information, ttached is a copy of the Staff s comments concerning the
request for the Office/Residential development proposal, which
was presented before the Conceptual Review Team on December 14, 1998.
This is a request for a mixed -use development containing office and residential
uses on approximately 7.7 acres located on the south and west side of Boardwalk
Drive between Landings Drive and Troutman Parkway. The property is in the E -
Employment Zoning District.
The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the
detailed components of the project application. Modifications and additions to
these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project.
If you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in
the review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6750.
Sincerel, Awclob�_
Steve Olt,
Project Planner
cc: Stormwater Utility
Streets
File
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
September 28, 1999
Steve Olt, Project Planner
Planning Department, City of Fort Collins
P.O. 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
Re: Park Place Project/Response to Conceptual Review Matters
Dear Steve,
In response to your letter of January 4, 1999, regarding conceptual review
comments:
1. The residential portion of the proposed project exceeds 25% of the
development plan and the properties located in the E Zoning District, therefore
it is a Type II review and our request for a modification is provided under
separate cover.
2. Locations of building signs will be designated on residential building
elevations.
3. Communication with all utilities engineers is planned as well as a utility
coordination meeting to assure that all utility requirements are met and the
various utilities are carefully coordinated.
4. This project has no property ownership or frontage on Troutman Parkway.
5. A neighborhood meeting was held and the primary concern was the regional
problems of traffic volume and unsafe traffic speeds along Boardwalk. The
most satisfactory solution suggested may be a traffic light at Landings and
Boardwalk.
6. All other matters raised in the conceptual review comments have been
addressed in the various submittal documents.
Sincerely,
JoVrout
JP/vd
3307 South College Avenue, Suite 200, Fort Collins, CO 80525 • (970) 226-5000 • Fax (970) 226-5125