Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRAMS PARK - PDP - 12-00 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEWI. All street, pedestrian, bike corridors and mid -block connections shall be accommodated and connect to adjacent and proposed facilities, please contact Kathleen Reavis of Transportation Planning. m. Product Design Concerns: 1. The site plan should include building envelope/footprint dimensions and distance to nearest property lines. 2. Please indicate all building colors on the Building Elevations in accordance with Section 3.5.1(G) of the Land Use Code. 3. Label the appropriate scale(s) for each illustrative elevation and sheet plan. 4. .Per Section 3.5.1(D) of the LUC, to the maximum extent feasible, primary facades and entries shall face the adjacent street. If facing a street is not feasible, at a minimum; a main entrance shall face a connecting walkway with a direct pedestrian connection to the street. "Maximum extent feasible" is defined in Article 5 of the LUC as "no feasible and prudent alternative exists, and all possible efforts to comply with the regulation or minimize harm or adverse impacts have been undertaken." "Connecting walkway" is defined in Article 5 of the LUC as "any street sidewalk, or any walkway that directly connects a building entrance(s) to the street sidewalk... without requiring pedestrians to walk across parking lots or driveways, around buildings, or follow parking lot outlines which are not aligned to a logical route." The development shall be designed to satisfy the requirements of Sections 3.5.1 and 3.5.2. 5. Please indicate all building dimensions, including doors, windows, etcetera, on building elevations. 6. The architectural elevations shall accommodate all provisions of the Land Use Code. n. Delineate all property lines and all rights -of -way widths and street improvements, sidewalk widths and improvements on all plans. o. All signs will require an additional sign permit outside this comment review. - p. The burden of demonstrating compliance with all Land Use Code criteria iswiththe applicant. q. The applicant/developer shall. coordinate all emergency and utility infrastructure needs to ensure that all infrastructure provisions are fully met. r. All modifications to code standards will be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board. 5 f. The water conservation standards for landscape and irrigation will apply. PIF's and water rights will be due at building permit. 8. Light and Power offers the following comments: a. Power available from existing system along Elizabeth Street. b. The applicant/developer shall acquire all necessary access corridors/easements. c. .The normal electric development charges will apply to this project. d. Coordinate all transformer and utility locations with Light and Power. 9. Advance Planning offers the following: a. The development shall comply with all Land Use Code provisions, including Section 3.5.2. b. The building's orientation is required to face the adjacent street with a direct pedestrian walkway to the street sidewalk system. 10. Historic Preservation offers the following comments: a. The existing structures will need to be evaluated for historical significance. b. .Demolition evaluation review process needs to be conducted. c. Coordinate all preservation concerns with Historic Preservation. -11. The Current Planning Department offers the following comments: a. This development request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Planning Department office. The development review fees are due at the time of submittal of the required Project Development Plan and compliance phases- of the development review by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies. b. Per LUC Section 3.2.1(D)(2) street trees shall be placed at thirty-foot to forty -foot spacing intervals in the center of all parkway areas. The trees shall be. placed at least eight (8) feet away from the edges of driveways and alleys, and forty feet (shade trees)/fifteen feet - (ornamental trees) (LUC 3.2.1(K) from any street light. All driveway locations and utilities shall be shown to ensure compliance with the Land Use Code. c. Show existing trees (including species and diameter) and designate whether they are to remain or be removed. Tree protection will be required in accordance with Section 3.2.1(F) of the Land Use Code. d. Address all visual clearance and sight distance triangle areas per Section 3.2.1(L) of the Land Use Code. e. Parking areas shall meet all landscape requirements addressed in the Land Use Code including Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. The actual interior parking lot landscaping percentages need to be shown. f. The site/landscape shall accommodate the minimum species diversity is provided in accordance with Section 3.2.1(D)(3) of the Land Use Code. g. Indicate all bus, pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle circulation routes and loading areas. h. Verification of the irrigation system connection points to ensure all landscaping is continuously maintained per Section 3.2.1 [J]. i. Provide a detailed light plan (spec. sheet for all wall and pole mounted fixtures) insuring that all lighting apparatuses are shielded down, meeting Sections 3.2.4 and 3.2.2. j. Please show and note all exterior mechanical devises, meters, et cetera, must be screened. k. Coordinate the sidewalk system through out the development with Transportation Planning Services. 4 j. May heed to accommodate a median for access management within West Elizabeth. k. Need to provide for emergency access with adequate easement and turning radii provisions. I. Three story structures will need to provide 30 foot drives and/or approval by P.F.A.. m. Property needs to be platted. 4. Transportation Planning: a. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) is required with your Development Plan submittal. To coordinate the parameters of this study, please contact Eric Bracke, the City's Traffic Engineer, and Kathleen Reavis, the City's Transportation Planner. b. The site shall meet ADA requirements. c. All street, pedestrian ways internal and external to the site, and bike corridor connections shall be accommodated and connect to adjacent and proposed facilities. d. Driveway locations shall meet all separation requirements. 5. The Natural Resources Department offers the following comments: a. Delineate all natural features, as defined in the Land Use Code. b.. Prairie dogs on -site need to be.removed. c. Accommodate potential trail access corridors through Parks and Recreation Planning. d. You will need to file a fugitive dust control permit and coordinate this through the Larimer County Environmental Health Department. Please contact them directly.- e. Provide adequate dumpster and trash enclosure area to accommodate a recycling container(s) (see attachment). f. One trash hauler should be used to minimize traffic impact as well as impact on the roads. g. Native grasses and plant materials should be used wherever appropriate and bluegrass should be minimized. 6. Fire Department: a. Please contact Ron Gonzales with Poudre Fire Authority to discuss requirements. b. All addresses shall be visible from a public street (6" numbers on a contrasting background). c.. Maximum hydrant spacing for multi -family developments is 600' with a flow rate of 1,500 gallons per minute at 20 psi (no structure further than 300' from a hydrant). d. Three story structures need to be fire sprinkled. e. Need a dedicated fire access lane (20 foot in width) with a 50-foot radius. 7. Water/Wastewater: a. 12-inch water in Elizabeth Street. b. 8-inch sewer in MF development to the north. c. The water main must be looped through the development and connected to the existing City system in a minimum of two points. d. Water pressure in this area is lower than the average in the city; therefore, hydraulics should be carefully evaluated from the standpoint fire protection and fire sprinkler flows at the lower pressure. e. Fire pumps may be needed. In the planning for utilities for this site, be aware that CSU has a 12-inch non -potable main in Elizabeth, which is north of the City's 12-inch main. 3 vehicle and bicycle parking, parking, building setbacks, landscaping, fence screening, et cetera. These development standards are set forth in the following divisions: 1) Division 3.1 General Provisions 2) Division 3.2 Site Planning and Design Standards 3) Division 3.3 Engineering Standards 4) Division 3.4 Environmental, Natural Area, Recreational and Cultural Resource Protection Standards 5) Division 3.5 Building Standards 6) Division 3.6 Transportation and Circulation - 7) Division 3.7 Compact Urban Growth Standards 8) Division 3.8 Supplementary Regulations. d. Please note LUC Section 3.2.2(K) as it regulates parking area requirements. e. Setback requirements are required per LUC Section 3.5.2(D). 2. Stormwater Utility offered the following comments: a. This site is located in the Canal Importation drainage basin where the new development fee is $6,181/acre and is subject to the runoff coefficient reduction. b. The standard drainage and erosion control reports and plans are required and they must be prepared by a professional engineer registered in Colorado. c. Onsite water quality and quantity detention are required. The release rate for quantity would be the 2 year historic rate unless the new Canal Importation master plan identifies a different rate. Street capacity may also control the release rate. d. If the site drains to the north, offsite drainage easements would be required. e. Raising the site may complicate the grading issues with surrounding properties, therefore, detailed offsite spot elevations will be needed to assure the grading is tied in so as to not change the quantity, quality, and character of runoff onto other properties. f. If the KFC water quantity detention pond is combined with this project and includes water quality extended detention, the water quality pond sizing would have to include the KFC site. The total detention volume required is water quality volume plus water quantity volume. 3. The Engineering Department offers the following comments: a. The standard utility plan and development agreement requirements must be submitted to the City for review and approval. b. Street oversizing fees will apply to this development. The street oversizing fee will be as follows: • Multi -family - $1,021 per dwelling unit c. Please contact Matt Baker for additional information regarding the actual fees related to your proposed development. d. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) is required with your development plan submittal. To coordinate the parameters of this study, please contact Eric Bracke, City Traffic Engineer, and Kathleen Reavis, City Transportation Planner. e. Roadway improvements to City standards along the property's frontage are required. All street improvements need to meet State and City Street Design Standards. f. Additional right-of-way adjacent to property's frontage may be required. g. Parking stalls need to meet setback requirements from West Elizabeth Street based on ADT. h. Joint access easement agreement will be required. i. Driveway locations shall align with those of adjacent properties across West Elizabeth. PA CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS City of Fort Collins MEETING DATE: November 15, 1999 ITEM: Campana Project Development Plan APPLICANT: Ms. Linda Ripley VF Ripley and Associates 1113 Stoney Hill Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 LAND USE DATA: Request to develop an 84 unit affordable multi -family development.' The site is located west of Kentucky Fried Chicken on West Elizabeth Road. The comments listed below are conceptual comments based upon a preliminary plan provided at the November 15, 1999 conceptual review meeting. The applicant is expected to apply all pertinent Land Use Code and Street Design Standards in their final design. The comments are to provide a reasonable amount of direction prior to the submittal of a development plan. The following comments shall not preclude staff from making additional comments in the future in regard to overall layout of the site. DEPARTMENTAL CONTACTS: Current Planning Zoning Department Engineering Department Street Oversizing Coordinator City Traffic Engineer Poudre Fire Authority Stormwater Utilities Water & Sewer Utilities Natural Resources Light and Power Historic Preservation Transportation Services Parks and Recreation Advance Planning . COMMENTS: Ron Fuchs Jenny Nuckols Dave Stringer Matt Baker Eric Bracke Ron Gonzales Glen Schlueter Roger Buffington Kim Kreimeyer Doug Martine Karen MacWilliams Mark Jackson . Janet Meisel -Burns Clark Mapes 1. The Zoning Department offered the following comments: 970.221-6750 970.221.6760 970.221.6605 970.224.6108 970.224.6062 970.221.6570 970.221.6681 970.221.6681 970.221.6750 970.221.6700 970.221.6376 970.416.2029 970.221.6367 970.221.6376 a. The site is located in the MMN, Medium Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood District and the NC, Neighborhood Commercial District; the project will be regulated under the Land Use Code (LUC) Article 4. b. The proposed land development will be subject to a Type 2 review. c. This development must comply with all applicable General Development Standards as set,. forth. in Article 3 of the Land Use Code, including but not limited to the requirements for COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 41 N. College Ave. PO. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970) 221-6750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Community Planning and Environmental Services Current . .nning City of Fort Collins December 1, 1999 Ms. Linda Ripley VF Ripley and Associates 1113 Stoney Hill Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Ms. Ripley: For your information, attached is a copy of Staffs comments concerning the Development Plan located west of Kentucky Fried Chicken on West Elizabeth Road presented before the Conceptual Review Team on November 15, 1999. The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the detailed components of the project application. Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project. The burden of demonstrating compliance with all Land Use Code criteria is with .the applicant. Please contact me at 970.221.6750 and/or e-mail: rfuchs6a ci.fort- collins.co.us if you should have any questions or concerns related to these comments. Sincerely, Ronald G. Fuchs City Planner cc: File Campana Ripley concept review letter 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020 h. Acknowledged. i. Given street frontage and design requirements of site, alignment not feasible. j. No median required for this project. k. Acknowledged. I. Acknowledged. 24' drive approved by PFA. m. Acknowledged. Re -plat included in PDP submittal. 4.a, b. Acknowledged. c. Acknowledged. All pedestrian/bicycle travel ways have been designed to link with adjacent existing and proposed facilities. d. Acknowledged. 5. Acknowledged. 6. Acknowledged. 7. Acknowledged. 8. Acknowledged. 9. Acknowledged. 10. Acknowledged. Efforts are being coordinated with Historic Preservation. 11. Acknowledged. Thank you for your time and consideration in the development of this site. Please let me know if you have any further issues or concerns with this project. Sincerely, Drew Thomas VF RIPLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. April 4, 2000 Mr. Ronald G. Fuchs City Planner Current Planning Department 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 VF RIPLEY ASSOCIATES INC. Landscape Architecture Urban Design Planning 401 West Mountain Avenue Suite 201 For Collins. CO 80521-2604 PHONE (970) 224-5928 FAX (970) 224-1662 Re: Response Conceptual Review Staff Comments on Rams Park (W. Elizabeth) multi -family development Dear Ron, We have revised our plan for the above named project as per Staff comments dated November 15,1999. Comments are addressed within this document or in the submittal drawings or documents as follows: 1. Acknowledged. 2.a. Acknowledged. b. Acknowledged. The required (4) copies are included in the PDP submittal. c. Acknowledged. d. No offsite drainage easements required for this project. e. Requested spot elevations included on grading plan. f. Acknowledged. 3.a-c. Acknowledged. d. Acknowledged. The required (13) copies are included in the PDP submittal. e. Acknowledged. f. No additional R.O.W. required for this project. g. Required 50' setback for arterial street is met.