HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHEROKEE FLYING HEIGHTS - PDP - 17-00 - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this
project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Please return all of your
redlined plans when you re -submit.
Sincerely,
CAMERON GLOSS
Current Planning Director
OL-
Page 4
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
24
Show locations of gas and electric on the overall utility plan. The location proposed
for electric and gas is not the usual location. Has gas and electric approved theses
locations? Perhaps electric and gas need to have a sign off area on this plan.
Topic: Plat
51
Is all the area outside of the building envelope a dedicated utility easement?
Clearly define all utility easements. All curb stops, water/sewer mains, fire
hydrants must be located within a utility easement or public right of way.
Topic: Utility Plans
49
Maintain 5 feet minimum of separation between fire hydrant and proposed
trash enclosure.
50
Maintain 10 feet of separation between thrust blocks and all other
underground utilities.
Department: Technical Services
Topic: Plat
52
Plat boundary closes
Issue Contact: J.R. Wilson
53
The "boundary" of building envelope #4 should be a solid line like the other
B.E. lines.
Department: Zoning
Issue Contact: Peter Barnes
Topic: landscaping
43
REPEAT, REPEAT COMMENT). The applicant's February 4, 2002 response letter
indicated that they have addressed Zoning's comment #1 regarding adding
wording to the Landscape Assurances note. The wording requested to be
added was "Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all landscaping"
etc. The letter stated that the note has been changed to reflect this
wording, but it hasn't. The wording is still the same as it was on the plan
dated 7-31-01.
Page 3
(2i20)
Sheet 5 still has issues regarding clarity. There are portions of the plan that are
unreadable and would not scan well with the Engineering Department's attempts to
scan approved documents.
39
The plans now show stormwater ADS pipe (previously RCP) in right-of-way to be
dedicated. ADS is not allowed in right-of-way, is there a reason for this change?
40
Show the stationing on Sheet 4 for the reference street profile.
41
The retaining walls along the south do not appear to be constructable without
encroaching onto the property on the south. The detail of the retaining wall on Sheet
13 shows a footer that would encroach onto the property to the south based upon
the cross sections shown on Sheet 7. A letter of intent would be required from the
property owner to the south prior to a hearing with the actual easement
subsequently required.
Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Drainage
44
Due to the pump not releasing flow at the 2-year historic rate, the detention
volume required and determined by the FAA mehtod is not accurate due to
no release rate until 69.83 feet in elevation. The pump has to have the
capability to pump at .79 cfs, Please call Wes Lamarque at 416-2418 to
discuss further,
45
The stage -storage -release rating curve for the detention pond does not
match the stage -storage curves, Please revise,
Topic: Grading
46
Please enlarge grading plan to fill whole page. The sheet is very hard to
read.
47
Please use outfall curb chase detail instead of the metal grate inflow
sidewalk chase detail. This is a concrete structure without the metal grate.
48
Please see other redlined comments in the plans and report.
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
Torgerson Architects Date: 2/27/2002
Mikal Torgerson
211 Jefferson
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Staff has reviewed your submittal for CHEROKEE FLYING HEIGHTS, #17-00, and
we offer the following comments. As soon as these minor issues are resolved, the
PDP will be scheduled for an Administrative Public Hearing:
ISSUES:
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: General
37
Revise the year for all documents to 2002.
Topic: Plat
32
Remove "Subdivision" from the Plat title (or add "P.D.P." to the title).
33
The name(s) of the lienholder(s) should be listed on the plat.
34
On the plat, remove the revisions listed on the revision sheet when a mylar copy is
submitted.
35
Note #4 on the plat is no longer needed with the addition of Note #7.
36
Please ensure that the emergency access easement shown on the plat is extended
through the utility easement to the Pennsylvania Street right-of-way.
38
It should be verified that City Light and Power needs to sign off on the plat and if so,
who at Light and Power (or is the City Manager's signature required?)
Topic: Utility Plans
10
The plan set shows unreadable contours. It would still be preferred if the utility plan
drawings were enlarged to a 30 or 20 scale.
Page 1