HomeMy WebLinkAboutGENERAL CARE HEALTH SERVICES - PDP - 22-00 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS (3)41
i) The meeting which you suggested was held on Friday, January 12t'. All
stormwater concerns were discussed and have been adequately
addressed such that another full round of staff review will no longer be
required.
Dick Rutherford has completed to Floodproofing Certificate and supporting
documentation. Other minor requirements such as foundation
floodproofing details and interior signage details will be provided in
conjunction with building permit review. The grading plan will be revised
to indicate a floodproof finished floor elevation of 4956.62.
j) No response required.
I am still awaiting your response to Jenny's comment from Zoning regarding the
decision on a modification request relative to LUC 4.16 (D)(3)(a)(2). It is my
hope that we can avoid scheduling this.project with the Planning and Zoning
Commission. If this is the case, then we feel we are ready to schedule this
project for public hearing with the hearing officer or the Director of Planning.
Also, please indicate the quantity of all submittal items required to complete the
Final Compliance Review of this PDP.
Thank you, Troy, for your assistance in completing the review of this project and
working with us to avoid the need for another round of review. Should you have
any questions related to the materials submitted, please call at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
RAJ
Alan Hauser, Architect
Architecture One, P.C.
cc: Charles Hatchette, Generalcare Health Services
Kelly Huff, R.C. Health Construction
QN@HDUM@VUM�
ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS, P.C. ONE
January 15, 2001
Mr. Troy W. Jones, Planner
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning Division
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80522
RE: Generalcare Health Services
PDP Final Compliance (Current Planning File #22-00)
Dear Troy:
We are in receipt of your redlined comments and letter of plan review dated
January 10, 2001 in regard to the above referenced project. We have made
appropriate revisions and modifications and are resubmitting the PDP at this time
for your final review, scheduling of public hearing, and final compliance. The
lettered responses below correspond with the same lettered comments in your
letter of plan review dated January 10, 2001:
a) No response required.
b) The year 2000 has been changed to 2001 on all drawings.
c) No response required.
d) Thank you for clarifying this interpretation of the Land Use Code. We are
pleased with this determination.
e) A note has been added to the building elevations which states: "AII
window and door glazing shall have a reflectivity or opacity of less than
sixty (60) percent."
f) This line was inadvertently omitted from the last submittal. The screened
dashed line has now been shown and noted on the landscape plan to
define the parking lot area. The interior parking lot landscaped area is
slightly greater than 7% of the parking lot area.
g) All plans have been revised to reflect the eight foot wide sidewalk to be
added along the southern edge of our site. As discussed at our January
12t' meeting, the western portion of this walk will be provided during
construction of the clinic facility while the eastern portion will be charged a
fee held in escrow and constructed by the City at a future time. One
parking space at the southwest corner of the lower parking lot has been
eliminated to provide adequate clearances at the sidewalk. The plat has
been revised to include a pedestrian access easement for this new
sidewalk.
h) Refer to response "g" above.
150 EAST 29TH STREET PALMER GARDENS, SUITE 200 LOVELAND, COLORADO 80538 970/669-9060
FACSIMILE 970/669-9066