Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANTATION MANOR - PDP - 39-00 - CORRESPONDENCE -rg III {".`,•?trr nll - tllll iiil '_ �'a iiii �I"e iii �S;;I■ ■ `t� 'RBI. ■Ir Ili-r'.life :i-11 III �'Z t - IIIII III IIII - H, ;Y s irl'i1" " i i1:ur;;' • ;I r("+ I 1 - 0�11 - IIII - 11 II IIIC nlrp :.. Irq/ .' nrp/' v°� 3�,. IIII _ II 5r t .S,;Lltltl till _ ...• -- ;.._, _ ..y� I4 .l. 4��lis: � �lf l I?_ --- i�i,m:nI�iI��••1.�P-�./�//i•'q1 .®tir..,.-Ui'1_ Y!41�.' • ,r .�lI_uII:I.,�_-- iII�� lIlIK,, ,�_.�.2 }}I_� 11� 1-1" = _. •-q-_I .•iur•�•u�_p•I_/�•_S1�-=/i_-_i �• •4' .•I�/•.n_"-I. IP�•1/r1■•0. I •-- IIII -�wiq :•::I1 /r.�I/P�.�:n�..11./ iui/iu1i1il7'.j1���'1i•�•�1�//i1•�•ii+�lu•11D�•ij�l.1P/.•1/P-I'•'�.:�..:i�ri1m'C���/!�1 iII/■��•�IPI.n•I/ .nt1 Il.lP/�.ItP�p••i� i I �P•N.I=! Ii IInIIIi tilI -, / -J'I1I-lI�- 1A �1J^i L I1Ii E�im iy.Aj rm-I oiler IIII IIII ��gill IIII IIII -11111 I II 11111 IIII IIII IIII 1 111 f1I1 ., 111 � p 1111�1=1 'ik 111h - I IIII IIIII IjI �' � i1 -rl i I IIII1111 �I-1 1 Il�s- ,-I 1. Ilu IIII I I - m wI-1 =11n 1111'1� �I i' INt . -i i i 11 1 A PL4TOF PLAN TA TION MANOR S?UA, Cc iN 7 NE SOUT7r•RYES7' 14 OF SEC770A 17, TOWNS PIP 7 NOR7N, RANGE 69 WES7, OF % PE SiX, r1 P. M., CR7'OFFORT COLUNS, C.OUNTYOFLARYMER, STA7FOFCOLORADC $[I BAN 'Mrlin�.ett � ion y Z 1 al J t I r e I� CONCEPT PLAN ZONING: 1-/"1N slow ZWmIfcf plrxed Use NBlcjl-bcrhood TOTAL 4.78 TOTAL L'C IFL_ NG UNITS PROPCIeEn: 3B r07AL ?11E LING UNM5 PER .;CRC 7.25 r07AOL Gt F6 % PdRK/NG sP.4CE6: 3B rOTAL fxREE-EY 6P.4CE- Z 73 ACRES 1573J FROFjE?qTr DcSC>KIFT/ON ha P-. or Sac-. T: 7owzeh4D 7 x0! & 'b:? :Lent or the nth f.r.., m�.� +�o-a orzll.Jt/y oeS,Stbe.�.'e fo i;cWw •Seo/r+','r� ,W the so, h !i/ curs or tr'!v • uoo 21 thsxs Nvih AS 006s A9 e+o' aret or• M r.u...ti V ,ns JAOV w South lrwe ar "Aa 3crttht ' bt J afstA c or 4CC.CC rtset: than& North CC 461s e1° C?Gu' 3sat pJ•i6e/ uhh the r a.h eArnlarfta .ter 504d Sact-' n 17 ♦ el/stJrra or D".CC rsat: lhirrca South Be atse'e /3OV' £Jet J wry. pr i[.1G:[.i(7 rs.it to J POLL a Yld Moth-Sash-�,-Ar— thr South CC zasq f e C1 a' E/ut fkna SAF0 Verth,6wth rrntsNa J ogm.& re ,r 1+2�. 0C resat w the FCM' OF BEL/A,N; VG, t:a�.r ty or Ls+mr• &LKO or C. AOrAfO. •• VV W ROW scraact 4 HOR5ETOOTH ROAD CRMCENT pttvrm 10. Parks and Recreation offers the following: a. The standard Neighborhood Park and Community Park fees will apply to this project (Ordinance No 205, 1998). b. Coordinate all park concerns with Parks and Recreation. 11. Advance Planning offers the following: a. Please note and address all City requirements. b. Streetscape improvements required. 12. Historic Preservation offers the following comments: a. Existing structures need to be reviewed through the demo/review process as required by Land Use Code 3.4.7 by the Landmarks Preservation Commission. b. Coordinate all preservation concerns with Historic Preservation. 6 E E I. The proposed land development requires documentation of all on -site and joint parking. m. Address all visual clearance and sight distance triangle areas per Section 3.2.1(L) of the LUC. n. All parking lots need to meet the parameters addressed in LUC Section 3.2.1(E)(5)(a) — (e) including 3.2.2(B)(5)(a) walkways shall have one (1) canopy shade tree per forty (40) lineal feet of walkways planted in a landscape strip within five (5) feet of such walkway. 1. Sidewalk connection(s) from (Crescent Drive, Big Ben Drive, and Aubrey Lane) to Horsetooth Road parallel to internal private drives with park strip and trees between drive and sidewalk. o. The development plan must sufficiently demonstrate an interrelation of pedestrian, vehicular and bicycle circulation ways and how the developments plan contribute to a cohesive, continuous and functional link within the surrounding area. 1. Section 3.2.2(B), (C)(1) & (5) — (7) and 3.2.2(D) — (E) requires that six-foot walkways within the site provide direct well direct well-defined and separated circulation routes for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. In accordance with the Land Use Code, on -site pedestrian systems shall provide directness, continuity, and safety and minimize the number of driveway and drive aisle crossings. p. Design Concerns: 1. The site plan needs to include building envelope/footprint dimensions and distance to nearest property lines. 2. Please indicate all building colors on the Building Elevations in accordance with Section 3.5.1(G) of the Land Use Code. 3. Label the appropriate scale(s) for each illustrative elevation and sheet plan. 4. Sections 3.5.1(D); 3.5.2 (C)(1); and, 3.5.2(C)(1) - (2) requires that to the maximum extent feasible that primary facades and entries face the adjacent street. Further, every front fagade needs to have a direct pedestrian connection to the street without requiring all pedestrians to walk through parking lots or cross driveways with no primary entrance more than 200 feet from a street sidewalk. In addition, minimum building frontage is to be attained from the street. If facing a street is not feasible, at a minimum, a main entrance shall face a connecting walkway with a direct pedestrian connection to the street. Please note the sidewalks through a parking lot will not suffice to meet Land Use Code criteria. "Maximum extent feasible" is defined in Article 5 of the LUC as "no feasible and prudent alternative exists, and all possible efforts to comply with the regulation or minimize harm or adverse impacts have been undertaken." "Connecting walkway" is defined in Article 5 of the LUC as "any street sidewalk, or any walkway that directly connects a building entrance(s) to the street sidewalk... without requiring pedestrians to walk across parking lots or driveways, around buildings, or follow parking lot outlines which are not aligned to a logical route." The development shall be designed to satisfy the requirements of Sections 3.5.1 and 3.5.2. 5. Please indicate all building dimensions, including doors, windows, etcetera, on building elevations. 6. The architectural elevations shall accommodate all provisions of the Land Use Code, including the garage standards. Coordinate all easements, open areas, street, sidewalk and pedestrian crossings, infrastructure through out the development. All infrastructure provisions need to be met and are to be in compliance with the Land Use Code. The burden of demonstrating compliance with all Land Use Code criteria is with the applicant. The application needs to comply with the submittal requirements as outlined in the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. All modifications to code standards will be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board. 5 e. Coordinate all utility and transformer locations with Light and Power. 9. The Current Planning Department offers the following comments: a. This development request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Planning Department office. The development review fees are due at the time of submittal of the required Project Development Plan and compliance phases of the development review by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies. b. An overall site plan needs to submitted and incorporate an area within five hundred (500') feet of the proposal and include all land uses, site improvements, traffic circulation, gross and net densities of residential uses (if applicable), exclusive of public right-of-way. All plan sets shall reference the project development plan. c. Delineate all property lines, property line setbacks for all proposed and existing structures and improvements, (Crescent Drive, Big Ben Drive, and Aubrey Lane) and Horsetooth rights -of -way width and improvements, private drive widths, and sidewalk widths on all plans as outlined by the submittal requirements of the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. d. Please note the development plan sets will need to include the following information as required by the City of Fort Collins Development Manual listing the proposed coverage of buildings and structures: (i) Percentage and square footage of building coverage. (ii) Percentage and square footage of driveway and parking. (iii) Percentage and square footage of public street right-of-way. (iv) Percentage and square footage of open space and/or landscaped area. (v) Percentage and square footage of "active recreational use" area. e. The landscape plan set needs to indicate the treatment of all exterior spaces including plant sizing meeting City standards and actual vegetation locations as required by the City of Fort Collins Development Manual. f. All street, pedestrian, bike corridors and vehicular/trail cross access connections and easements shall be accommodated and connect to adjacent developments and proposed facilities. g. The site is located in the LMN, Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood District and the project will be regulated under the Land Use Code (LUC). 1. All sections of LUC Division 4.4 of the Land Use Code need to be complied with including 4.4(B) Permitted Uses; 4.4(C) Prohibited Uses; 4.4(D) Land Use Standards (1) Density (2) Mix of Housing (3) Neighborhood Centers; and, (E) Development Standards. 2. The maximum residential building height per Section 4.4(E)(3) is 2.5 stories. h. Per LUC Section 3.2.1(D)(2) street trees shall be placed at thirty-foot to forty -foot spacing intervals in the center of all parkway areas. The trees shall be placed at least eight (8) feet away from the edges of driveways and alleys, and forty feet (shade trees)/fifteen feet (ornamental trees) (LUC 3.2.1(K) from any street light. All driveway locations and utilities shall be shown to ensure compliance with the Land Use Code. i. Please make sure the minimum species diversity is provided in accordance with Section 3.2.1(D)(3) of the Land Use Code. j. Please note LUC Section 3.2.1(E)(4) Parking Lot Perimeter Landscaping addresses the need to screen parking areas with the a plan clearly identifying the extent and location of all plant material and landscape features. Please note LUC requiring trees be planted every 25' between parking lots and the street, and every 40' between parking lots and interior lot lines. k. Show existing trees (including species and diameter) and designate whether they are to remain or be removed. Tree protection is required according to LUC with Section 3.2.1(F). 4 j. The applicant/developer shall acquire all necessary access corridors/easements. 4. Transportation Planning offers the following: a. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) is required with your Development Plan submittal. To coordinate the parameters of this study, please contact Eric Bracke, Traffic Engineer, and Mark Jackson, Transportation Planner. b. The site shall meet ADA requirements. c. All street, vehicular drives, pedestrian and bike corridors shall be accommodated and connect to adjacent and proposed infrastructure and land developments. 5. The Natural Resources Department offers the following comments: a. Delineate all natural features, including the canal, as defined in the Land Use Code. b. You will need to file a fugitive dust control permit and coordinate this through the Larimer County Environmental Health Department. Please contact them directly. c. Provide adequate dumpster and trash enclosure area to accommodate a recycling container(s) (see attachment). d. Native grasses and plant materials should be used wherever appropriate and bluegrass should be minimized. 6. Fire Department offers the following: a. A minimum of two access points needs to be provided. b. The proposed access system does not provide adequate circulation and basic order. c. Water flow rate of 1,500 gallons per minute at 20 psi. d. All addresses shall be visible from a public way. e. Adequate access shall be provided to serve the site. f. Please contact Ron Gonzales with Poudre Fire Authority to discuss these requirements. 7. Water/Wastewater offers the following: a. Existing Mains: 16-inch water in Horsetooth, 6-inch water in Big Ben Drive; 8-inch sewer in Enfield. b. Sanitary sewer was not stubbed out of Enfield in Big Ben Drive. The intent may have been to connect this site to the Warren Lake Trunk sewer to the east or the depth of the sewer in Enfield may not be great enough to adequately serve the site. c. A water main repay is also due for the 16-inch water main in Horsetooth. d. The water conservation standards for landscape and irrigation will apply. e. PIF's and water rights will be due at time of building permit. f. Coordinate infrastructure needs through the Water and Wastewater Utility Department. 8. Light and Power offers the following comments: a. A C-1 Form shall be filed with Light and Power. b. New structures will need a transformer. c. The applicant/developer shall acquire all necessary access corridors/easements. d. The normal electric development charges will apply to this project. 3 d. This development must comply with all applicable General Development Standards as set forth in Article 3 of the Land Use Code, including but not limited to the requirements for vehicle and bicycle parking, parking, building setbacks, landscaping, fence screening, et cetera. These development standards are set forth in the following divisions. 1) Division 3.1 General Provisions 2) Division 3.2 Site Planning and Design Standards 3) Division 3.3 Engineering Standards 4) Division 3.4 Environmental, Natural Area, Recreational and Cultural Resource Protection Standards 5) Division 3.5 Building Standards 6) Division 3.6 Transportation and Circulation 7) Division 3.7 Compact Urban Growth Standards 8) Division 3.8 Supplementary Regulations 2. Stormwater Utility offered the following comments: a. This site is in the Spring Creek basin where the new development fee is $2,175/acre, which is subject to the runoff coefficient reduction. The site is in inventory grid #4N. b. The standard drainage and erosion control reports and construction plans are required and must be prepared by a professional engineer registered in Colorado. c. Extended detention is required to treat the runoff. d. Onsite detention with a 2-year historic release rate is required unless there are downstream capacity restrictions or the City's drainage masterplans defines a specific release rate. e. Bret thinks the site drains to Horsetooth Road. If it does, that will put it in the Foothills basin where the new development fee is $6,525/acre. That could also be a basin transfer and the system has not been designed for this site to drain that way. The design engineer should contact Stormwater early on after the existing drainage patterns have been identified since this site is on the edge of the Spring Creek basin. 3. The Engineering Department offers the following comments: a. The standard utility plan and development agreement requirements must be submitted to the City for review and approval. b. Street oversizing fees will apply to this development. Contact Matt Baker for additional information regarding the actual fees related to your proposed development. c. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) is required with your Development Plan submittal. To coordinate the parameters of this study, please contact Eric Bracke, Traffic Engineer, and Mark Jackson, Transportation Planner. d. Full roadway and right-of-way dedication for (Crescent Drive, Big Ben Drive, and Aubrey Lane) and Horsetooth Road to City standards along the property's frontages including all internal streets will be required. e. Off -site road along Horsetooth Road to tie proposed improvements to existing would be required. f. Private drives shall be designed and improved to City standards in LUC Section 3.6.2. g. Adequate access shall be provided from public streets, including access for surrounding areas/properties. h. Utility easement adjacent to rights -of -way will be needed. i. Access roads shall be designed and improved to City standards. CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS City of Fort Collins MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 ITEM: Plantation Manor Park Development Plan APPLICANT: Mr. Brett Larimer LAND USE DATA: Request to potentially develop 38 multi -family dwelling units on approximately 5 acres. The plan centers on an extension of a local street called Big Ben Drive through to Horsetooth Road. The comments listed below are conceptual comments based upon a preliminary plan provided by the applicant at the August 28, 2000 conceptual review meeting. The applicant is expected to apply all pertinent Land Use Code and Street Design Standards in their final design. The comments are to provide a reasonable amount of direction prior to the submittal of a development plan. The following comments shall not preclude staff from making additional comments in the future in regard to overall layout of the site. DEPARTMENTAL CONTACTS Current Planning Ron Fuchs 970.221-6750 Zoning Department Jenny Nuckols 970.221.6760 Engineering Department Tim Blandford 970.221,6605 Street Oversizing Coordinator Matt Baker 970.224.6108 City Traffic Engineer Eric Bracke 970.224.6062 Poudre Fire Authority Ron Gonzales 970.221.6570 Stormwater Utilities Glen Schlueter 970.221.6681 Water & Sewer Utilities Roger Buffington 970.221.6681 Natural Resources Kim Kreimeyer 970.221.6750 Natural Resources Margit Hentschel 970.224.6179 Light and Power Doug Martine 970.221.6700 Historic Preservation Karen McWilliams 970.221.6376 Transportation Services Mark Jackson 970.416.2029 Parks and Recreation- Craig Foreman 970.221.6618 Advance Planning Ken Waido 970.221.6376 COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Department offered the following comments: a. The site is located in the LMN — Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zone District (Division 4.4). b. The proposal will be regulated under all provisions of the Land Use Code (LUC) and will be subject to a Type 1 review. c. The standards per LUC Sections 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 relating to building placement and orientation to a connecting walkway need to be complied with. CO,YLtiIUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2�1 N. College Ave. PO. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO S0522-0580 (970) 221-5750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT