HomeMy WebLinkAbout208 - 214 PETERSON STREET, REPLAT (LOTS 7 & 8, BLOCK 152) - PDP/FDP - 43-00 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSCameron Gloss - 214 peterson st develr,^ment Page
From: joe Sullivan <j_sulli@juno.com>
To: FC8.CPES(cplanning)
Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2001 10:13 PM
Subject: 214 peterson st development
Sirs,
I recieved a note from the Community Planning and Environmental
Services.The note talks about a
development involving 208 and 214 Peterson St.
I own a house around the corner on Magnolia St. I will not be able to
attend the neighborhood
information meeting on January 30th. I am living in Colorado Springs for
the near future.
My living here in Colorado Springs has shown me just how special the old
town area of Ft Collins is.
I have seen what could be called the old town area of Colorado Springs
and after the seeing it and
reading the note on current planning, I must say I object to subdividing
the two lots on Peterson St into 3 lots.
One of the things that I have always enjoyed about the old town area was
the wide streets and the
large lots in the area. I have owned or rented houses in old town for
about 20 years. There is a comfortable
feeling to the area. Even as Ft Collins has grown the old town area still
has a small town feel to it.
When I saw the "old town" area of Colorado Springs I saw houses of
similiar age to to the old town
area of Ft Collins, however I saw lots that had been subdivided over the
years into smaller lots.
To be blunt it looks like hell. Houses are right on top of each other and
yards are almost non-existant.
If I were to stay here in Colorado Springs I would not consider buying
property in the older area. Even though
most of the houses are kept up the area looks cluttered and uninviting.
If this subdivision of the lots at 208 and 214 Peterson is allowed to
continue, I fear this will happen to more
properties in the area. The area will then lose the charm that it has had
since I have lived there.
I have travelled all over this country as part of my job, I have seen
many towns that could have been special
but weren't because they didn't care about what they had. So far Ft
Collins has done a great job
please don't mess it up.
Joe Sullivan
Home owner
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Q: Who will own the rear lot?
A: Probably a 4-owner Homeowner's Association.
Comment: The site layout with a duplex at the rear does not support owner -
occupancy.
Comment: Parking is a neighborhood issue- people don't walk and won't find
parking if they can't see it.
Q: Will there be additional lighting along the alley?
A: None is proposed.
208-212 Peterson Neighborhood Meeting — January 30, 2001
Neighborhood Comments
Q: How many square feet will be within each duplex unit?
A: 1,400 square feet, with a full unfinished basement and a two -car garage.
Q: Could the front or rear houses be "popped up"?
A: Modifications to the front and rear houses would be subject to review by the
LPC. The LPC may not look favorably on those changes.
Comment: This is setting a precedent for adding duplexes/ additional density
(comment mentioned 3 times)
Q: Are these flag lots?
A: No, each lot has frontage on a public street.
Q: What about the increased load on sanitary sewer?
A: This will be evaluated as part of the development application.
Q: General question from the neighborhood:
Do residents have a problem with inadequate sewer systems?
A: Yes, in some cases (inadequate fall)
Comment: With impact on the alley, it will set a trend- could have a negative
long-term impact if the new development is not done "right'.
Comment: Changes to LPC membership are not predictable.
Q: Where are the off-street parking spaces for the front units?
A: Within garages and parking spaces abutting the alley
Q: What is the number of alley houses constructed since the code was changed?
A: No specific numbers, but very few have been constructed.
Q: What is the price range of the rear units?
A: $275,000 to $300,000
Comment: Part of the character of Old Town is deep, narrow lots.
Comment: the "Front' houses have been appropriately rehabbed.
Comment: no off-street parking for the front units is a problem (2 people
commented). People will park in the alley as an alternative.
No Text
Replat of 208-212 Peterson, File #43-00
July 10, 2001 Type 1 Hearing
Page 6 of 6
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS
A. The Replat of 208-212 Peterson Street (Lots 7 and 8, Block 152)
contains a permitted use in the NCM — Neighborhood Conservation
Medium Density Zoning District.
B. The Replat of 208-212 Peterson Street (Lots 7 and 8, Block 152)
request meets the procedural requirements located in Division 2.1 -
General Procedural Requirements, and Division 2.2 - Common
Development Review Procedures for Development Applications.
C. The Replat of 208-212 Peterson Street (Lots 7 and 8, Block 152)
meets the plat requirements located in Section 3.3.1 - Plat
Standards located in Article 3 - General Development Standards.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Replat of 208-212 Peterson Street (Lots 7 and
8, Block 152), Current Planning File #43-00.
Replat of 208-212 Peterson, File #43-00
July 10, 2001 Type 1 Hearing
Page 5 of 6
allowed and the size of the two homes is minimal, thereby
preserving the same amount of open space that would be found
with a duplex.
2. The proposed rear homes will be subordinate in size and height
to the existing front houses, where a single duplex building
would be larger than the front houses.
3. The Landmark Preservation Commission and City staffs
position is that a duplex structure would be out of character with
the nearby -designated properties, and would adversely impact
the historical significance of the National Register District. The
proposed "alley house" design will preserve the historic
attributes of the nearby properties and will protect the special
character of this neighborhood better than a duplex would.
The applicant will move the electric transformer from the alley right-
of-way onto the their property. This relocation will allow for
concrete pavement of the 16 foot -wide alley from the subject
property to the intersection of Oak Street.
C. The replat is in compliance with Section 3.3.1(C) Public Sites,
Reservations and Dedications in that:
1) A 10 foot -wide utility, drainage and pedestrian access easement
has been dedicated along the south side of Lots 7-A and 7-B to
accommodate a 4.5 foot -wide paved walkway connecting the new
units with the existing public sidewalk on Peterson Street. Included
within the easement are water and sanitary sewer service lines
connecting to existing mains in the alley (sanitary sewer) and the
street (Water).
2) Gas services lines will be centered within utility easements on the
north side of Lot 7-A and south side of Lot 8-A.
3) An additional 5 foot -wide easement has been dedicated adjacent
the alley to permit vehicular access to the garages and provide
clearance for electric utilities.
4) Site drainage will be conveyed from the site to the alley though
easements situated on all four lots.
Replat of 208-212 Pete, son, File #43-00
July 10, 2001 Type 1 Hearing
Page 4 of 6
1) The subdivision plat will be filed and recorded only after having
been approved by the Director of Planning, with such approval
evidenced in writing on the plat and signed by the City Clerk.
2) No building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued for
construction of any new principal building or no act which changes
the use of any building shall be permitted until the subdivision plat
is filed and recorded in the City of Fort Collins.
B. The replat is in compliance with Section 3.3.1(B) Lots in that:
1) Each newly created lot has direct access to a public street (in this
case, a public alley) and the side lot lines are substantially at right
angles or radial to the street lines.
2) The general layout of driveways, utilities, drainage facilities and
other services within the proposed development accomplishes the
purposes and intent of the Land Use Code.
The subdivision and the construction of new single family houses are
subject to the development standards within the NCM zoning district.
Dwellings proposed to be constructed between the back of an existing
dwelling and the rear property line may contain a maximum of 800
square feet of floor area and must comply with the setback
requirements. Development Standards within the zoning district
(Section 4.7(F)) specify parameters for building design,
landscape/hardscape material, vehicular access, and site design.
The submitted replat and PDP satisfies all applicable Article 4
standards, except in the case of the minimum lot area standard of
5,000 sq. ft. This minimum standard was modified through a variance
granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on April 12, 2001. The Board
found that the proposal will "advance and protect the public interest
and purposes of the standard for which the variance is requested
equally well or better than would a proposal which complies with the
standard for which the standard is requested" because:
1. The overall purpose of the standard is to limit the density of
development on a lot and ensure that there is adequate open
space for the use and enjoyment of the occupants. Without the
variance, the square footage of the land at the rear of 208 and
212 Peterson is large enough to allow two dwelling units in the
form of a duplex, and the square footage of the proposed alley
houses is that than the permitted duplex. Therefore, the two
proposed homes do not increase the density beyond what is
Replat of 208-212 Peterson, File #43-00
July 10, 2001 Type 1 Hearing
Page 3 of 6
and the Affordable Housing Board, and an at -large member. A public outreach
process was begun and three public workshops were held. Additionally, staff
met with existing neighborhood organizations and formed a focus group.
Numerous other open houses and meetings were held as well. Notices of the
open houses were delivered to each home in the areas, and over 100 people
attended each session. This process resulted in proposed standards and
guidelines that were originally presented to Council for adoption in August 1995.
At that time, Council provided direction to staff to revise the document to simplify
and clarify the text.
When new land use standards within the NCM zone were finally adopted, a
minimum lot area equivalent of two times the total floor area of the buildings, but
not less than 5,000 square feet for a single-family dwelling, was established. The
size of an alley house was also specifically limited to 800 square feet of floor
area. In 1997, when the present Land Use Code was adopted, these standards
were transferred directly to the new code language.
The applicant proposes four lots, two of which fall below the minimum 5,000
square feet permitted under the NCM zone (4,500 sq. ft. and 4,435 sq. ft.). The
Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variance to the minimum lot area standard on
April 12, 2001. A more detailed discussion of the Board's findings is included
under staffs analysis of this application relative to the General Development
Standards of Article 3.
Although not part of the subdivision plat under review, it should be noted that the
Landmark Preservation Commission has completed a complimentary review of
proposed development plans and has found them architecturally compatible with
the two historic houses at 208-212 Peterson Street.
2. Compliance with Article 2 - Administration
The request complies with the applicable requirements of the LUC, specifically
the procedural requirements located in Division 2.1 - General Procedural
Requirements, and Division 2.2 - Common Development Review Procedures for
Development Applications.
3. Compliance with Article 3 - General Development Standards
The request complies with the applicable requirements of the LUC, specifically
the plat requirements located in Section 3.3.1 - Plat Standards located in Article 3
- General Development Standards.
A. The replat is in compliance with Section 3.3.1(A) General
Provisions in that:
Replat of 208-212 Pete, son, File #43-00
July 10, 2001 Type 1 Hearing
Page 2 of 6
COMMENTS
Background
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows
N: NCM — Detached single family houses
NCB — Apartments
E: LMN — Detached single family houses
S: NCM — Detached single family houses, duplexes, and apartments
W: NCM — City of Fort Collins Main Library
This proposal replats two lots that are part of the original Fort Collins townsite
created in 1873.
The site is located on the eastside of Peterson Street, 100 feet south of E. Oak
Street and lies within the Neighborhood Conservation Medium Density (NCM)
District. The NCM district was created as an outgrowth of the Eastside/Westside
Plan rezoning and implementing standards that occurred in 1991. At that time,
the newly created NCM and NCB zones required a minimum lot area of 4,500
square feet per single family or two-family dwelling. This meant that if a lot had
at least 9,000 square feet of lot area, then the potential existed for the
construction of an alley house at the rear of the property.
Between 1991 and 1993 a significant number of alley houses were in constructed
in the 500 and 600 blocks of Meldrum, Sherwood, and Whitcomb. Several were
also built in the Eastside Neighborhood. The City began receiving numerous
complaints from neighbors concerned the development of these secondary units
was incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Many of these new
buildings were larger than the house on the front of the lots, with the original
house becoming subordinate in size to the new house.
City Council members also became concerned about impacts associated with
increased residential density. As a result, Council adopted an emergency
ordinance in December 1993 that resulted in an increase in the minimum lot area
requirement from 4,500 square feet per building to 5,500 square feet per
building. The intent of the ordinance was to temporarily halt construction of alley
houses. Staff was also instructed to work with a consultant to prepare design
guidelines, reevaluate the lot area/density issue, and arrive at a permanent
solution.
In October, 1994, the City hired Winter & Company and RNL Design as
consultants to assist in the preparation of design guidelines. A citizen advisory
committee was established consisting of residents of the eastside/westside
neighborhoods, representatives from the Landmarks Preservation Commission
ITEM NO.
MEETING DATE -1.10 0►
STAFF_ �tµu�ovl l9lo�iGi
Citv of Fort Collins HEARING OFFICER
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Replat of 208-212 Peterson Street (Lots 7 and 8, Block 152)
Current Planning File #43-00
APPLICANT: Stewart and Associates, Inc.
Richard A. Rutherford
103 S. Meldrum St.
Fort Collins, CO 80522
OWNER: S.L.C. Company
401 W. Mulberry St.
Fort Collins, CO 80522
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request to replat properties addressed as 208 and 212 Peterson Street
from two lots to four lots, creating two lots fronting Peterson Street and two lots
abutting the alley. Upon approval, the applicant intends to construct one
detached single family "alley house" of 800 square feet on each of the newly
created rear lots.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This request complies with the applicable requirements of the Land Use Code
(LUC), specifically the procedural requirements located in Division 2.1 - General
Procedural Requirements, Division 2.2 - Common Development Review
Procedures for Development Applications; and Section 3.3.1 - Plat Standards
located in Article 3 - General Development Standards.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. PO. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT