HomeMy WebLinkAbout208 - 214 PETERSON STREET, REPLAT (LOTS 7 & 8, BLOCK 152) - PDP/FDP - 43-00 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)29 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Utilities must be installed underground and, if located in an alley, shall be in
place prior to the completion of alley surfacing. 3.3.2 (d) 7. Telephone service
has not been undergrounded. Please address this issue.
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Yours Truly,
CAMERON GLOSS
City Planner
4 of 5
V
16 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Alley plan and profile:
Please provide a 20' cross-section from the southern limits of pavement to the
electrical transformer pad north of the site. From the transformer pad to 10,
from the sidewalk please provide a 16' cross-section. The remaining 10' length
should transition from the 16' width to the width of the driveway to Oak (approx.
13').
17 issue t,onraGL. naue wwvi c
Show stationing on the plan view of the alley.
18 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Where is section "a -a"? Should it be labeled a "typical section"?
19 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Please change note 1 to read "Grade alley as shown," not "as necessary."
20 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Please provide an expansion joint in the concrete at the edge of ROW where
the alley pavement abuts the driveway for the new houses.
21 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Repeat comments:
Please close curb cut along Peterson.
22 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Please provide driveway and alley details from the street standards on the
detail sheet .
23 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Please clarify the connection of the alley, sidewalk and driveway to Oak. There
will be an inverse crown section of alley meeting a flat section of sidewalk. The
transition between the two needs to allow the continuance of flows out to the
street.
24 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Please correct general notes and plat wording.
25 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Please clearly show ROW (label and didmension) for Peterson, Oak and alley,
and clearly show easements (label and dimension).
26 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
On the cover sheet, please reference the updated or current soils report.
27 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Please see plans for additional comments.
28 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Building elevations and floor elevations shown on the grading plan don't match.
Please match them and show the basement floor elevation on the grading plan.
3 of 5
6 Issue Contact. Katie Moore
Overall Utility Plan
Please show approximate limits of street cuts on Peterson and Oak and add the
note(s): Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined
in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs are to be in
accordance with City Street Repair Standards.
7 Issue Contact., Katie Moore
Please verify that the electrical transformer pad is no lower than the alley
elevation.
8 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Where do the gas lines go?
9 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
The poles shown as power poles are actually telephone poles.
10
Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Drainage Plan:
Please show that flows from side yards and driveways abutting the paved and
newly graded sections of the alley are not impeded by the new
grading/pavement.
Please show locations of driveway connections to the alley.
The current level of detail is insufficient.
11 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Please provide subdrain report or eliminate the basements. A subdrain report
is required to address the issue of groundwater and subgrade floor levels as
mentioned in the geotech. report. Drainage is required to be routed to an
approved drainage facility (most likely down the alley to tie into a main in Oak).
Subdrain criteria are attached to the overall utility plan page.
12 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
For dirt section of alley, show new grade lines and tie-ins for new grades.
13 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Silt fence along the north edge of the property should be on this property, not
the neighbor's.
14 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Grading as shown along the south edge of the property requires an offsite
grading_ easement from the property owner to the south.
15 Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Where the 70 grading line crosses the alley, shouldn't it be more of a straight
line on the eastern half?
2 of 5
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
S.L.C. COMPANY
STEWART & ASSOC.
103 S. MELDRUM ST.
FT. COLLINS, CO 80522
Date: 5/25/2001
Staff has reviewed your submittal for 208 and 214 PETERSON, REPLAT #43-00, and we
offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Current Planning
Issue Contact: Cameron Gloss
Administrative Hearing Schedule
Once all outstanding development reviews are addressed and the final version
of the subdivision plat are submitted, a Type I Administrative Hearing will be
scheduled. A minimum of two weeks mail notice to affected property owners is
required.
2 Issue Contact: Cameron Gloss
Building Elevation Labels
Please add labels to the building elevations clearly denoting which elevations
pertain to a specific house, e.g.- South Elevation on Lot 8-B
3 Issue Contact: Cameron Gloss
Elevation Discrepancy
The lower, east -west ridgeline shown on the West Elevation is 18 inches higher
than as depicted on the South elevation. Please lower the ridgeline to correctly
correspond.
4 Issue Contact: Cameron Gloss
Porches on Site Plan
Please show all proposed porches on the Site Plan. The submitted Site Plan
does not show the large porches (mislabled on the Floor Plans as Redwood
Deck") on the back side of the houses. Please note that no portion of the
porches may encroach into the utility and drainage easements.
Engineering
5
Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Plat comments:
Please delineate edges of easements more clearly - show lines separating
different types of easements.
The 8' utility easement along the alley that was requested previously can be a
5' easement instead.
Please see plat for further comments.
1 of 5