The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSTALEY ELEMENTARY 2001 - SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW - 7-01A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY0 N a y C C C V y U O y y C � X � U n y C n fn � v MA O y N " c m � n c 3 h G V �s MA O y N " c m � n c 3 h G V �s �s F o . I II- o_ N = = d l.l1 � O Adak Harmony � OU rn U O �m F 4 CR36 O O elVf1LG. —wvv PEDESTRIAN DESTINATIONS FOR STALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 33 APPENDIX G 3Z HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt mjdpe ate Performed: Wgency/Co.: 2/18/01 alysis Time Period: a pm short Ilong Intersection: cr cinquifoil fort collins 'Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total P t ID• 0110 e5c:;'C� roiec East/West Street: cr36 forth/South Street: cinquifoil Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 3u Lev yv Ju Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 188 100 33 144 5 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 'Configuration L T R L TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 55 10 15 15 20 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 61 11 16 16 22 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Approach 'Movement Lane Config Storage 0 1 0 LTR 0 1 0 LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB Wg Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 33 33 88 bu C(m) (vph) 1445 1286 491 524 v/c 0.02 0.03 0.18 0.11 95% queue length 0.07 0.08 0.65 0.39 Control Delay 7.5 7.9 13.9 12.8 A A B B 'LOS Approach Delay 13.9 12.8 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY L,�JP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 18/01 Analysis Time Period am m short long Intersection: cr36/cinquifoi Jurisdiction: fort collins Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 North/South Street: cinquifoil Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 25 140 35 10 180 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 155 38 11 200 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- .Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T R L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (8) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 90 15 25 5 5 45 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 100 16 27 5 5 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 Lane Config L L I LTR I Southbound 11 12 LTR v (vph) 27 11 143 60 C(m) (vph) 1366 1392 515 740 v/c 0.02 0.01 0.28 0.08 95% queue length 0.06 0.02 1.13 0.26 Control Delay 7.7 7.6 14.7 10.3 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 14.7 10.3 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 1 30 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 ' TWO-WAY )P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt mjdpe 'Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 2/18/01 Analysis Time Period: am ®m short long Intersection: cr36/access c/s1 e Jurisdiction: fort collins Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 North/South Street: access c/site Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0.25 Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 15 270 15 15 185 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 300 16 16 205 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 'RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach EB 'Movement 1 Lane Config L 15 5 15 5 5 10 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 16 5 16 5 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 16 16 Ji `� 558 (vph) 1373 1256 506 'C(m) v/c 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.04 95% queue length 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.12 Control Delay 7.7 7.9 12.7 11.7 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 12.7 11.7 Approach LOS B B I I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 ' 2� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY _0P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 2/18/01 Analysis Time Period: am m short long Intersection: /access c/s Jurisdiction: fort collins Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd (!ota:) Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 North/South Street: access c/site Intersection Orientation: EW �C'CSqLT� Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 175 40 45 265 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 194 44 50 294 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 30 15 20 5 20 15 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 33 16 22 5 22 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 5 50 71 43 C(m) (vph) 1274 1341 440 459 v/c 0.00 0.04 0.16 0.09 95% queue length 0.01 0.12 0.57 0.31 Control Delay 7.8 7.8 14.7 13.7 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 14.7 13.7 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 [SJ APPENDIX F 2I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY .,.OP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 2/18 01 Analysis Time Period: am m short long Intersection: cr3 cinqui oil Jurisdiction: fort collins Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 North/South Street: cinquifoil Intersection Orientation: EW Q ✓� 12 e Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 95 20 5 130 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 105 22 5 144 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0-- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 1 5 5 1 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 1 5 5 1 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 11 5 22 17 C(m) (vph) 1445 1472 690 791 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.02 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.10 0.07 Control Delay 7.5 7.5 10.4 9.7 LOS A A B A Approach Delay 10.4 9.7 Approach LOS B A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 2 (0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt gency/Co.: mjdpe katePerformed: 2 18/O1 �nalysis Time Period: am m short long Intersection: cr36/ci oil urisdiction: fort collins Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 Iorth/South Street: cinquifoil Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0.25 Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 . L T R I L T R Volume 15 100 15 5 70 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 ill 16 5 77 5 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 'Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No nor Street: Approacn NorLnDounc ouuul111VLL11LL Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 'RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 25 1 S 5 1 zu 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 27 1 5 5 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No 0 1 0 LTR No 0 1 0 LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ' Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 16 5 33 28 C(m) (vph) 1528 1472 710 904 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.03 95% queue length 0.03 0.01 0.15 0.10 Control Delay 7.4 7.5 10.3 9.1 LOS A A B A Approach Delay 10.3 9.1 Approach LOS B A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY _.OP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: North/South Street: matt mjdpe 2/18/01 am 3 long crc/site fort collins 2001 bkgrnd total cr36 access c/site Intersection Orientation: EW t9C cF S l Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 110 15 15 140 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 122 16 16 155 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (8) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 15 5 15 1 5 5 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 16 5 16 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v kvpn) J lb 3/ 11 C(m) (vph) 1436 1458 711 693 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.03 0.16 0.05 Control Delay 7.5 7.5 10.3 10.3 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.3 10.3 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 2A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Wgency/Co.: mjdpe ate Performed: 2/18/01 C S s alysis Time Period pm shor long 3 40 Intersection: cr36/access c/site urisdiction: fort collins alysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 itorth/South Street: access c/site Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Wolume 5 iuu vo Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 ill 50 ercent Heavy Vehicles tP 0 -- -- edian Type Undivided RT Channelized? 1 1 0 'Lanes Configuration L TR Upstream Signal? No r Street: Rpproacn Movement 40 75 1 0.90 0.90 0.90 44 83 1 0 -- -- 1 1 0 L TR No IVVL 1,11UUU11U 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 35 10 30 1 15 5 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 11 33 1 16 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 5 44 82 22 C(m) (vph) 1526 1430 691 624 v/c 0.00 0.03 0.12 0.04 95% queue length 0.01 0.10 0.40 0.11 Control Delay 7.4 7.6 10.9 11.0 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.9 11.0 Approach LOS B B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 ' 23 APPENDIX E 22 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMAR Analyst: matt a�gency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 2/18 O1 L �A�nalysis Time Period: am m short long �r Intersection: cr3 /cinquifoil� urisdiction: fort coll' Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 forth/South Street: cinquifoil Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R 'Volume 25 165 85 30 125 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 183 94 33 138 5 tPercent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0-- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No 1 1 1 1 1 0 'Lanes Configuration L T R L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 50 10 15 15 20 15 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 55 11 16 16 22 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grade (8) 0 0 'Percent Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 27 33 82 54 C(m) (vph) 1452 1298 517 520 'v/c 0.02 0.03 0.16 0.10 95% queue length 0.06 0.08 0.56 0.35 Control Delay 7.5 7.8 13.3 12.7 A A B B 'LOS Approach Delay 13.3 12.7 Approach LOS ,B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY JP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: Analysis Time Period:Qpm 2/18/01 short long Intersection: cr36/cinquifoil Jurisdiction: fort coll' s Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 North/South Street: cinquifoil Intersection Orientation: EW ALA Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 130 25 10 165 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 144 27 11 183 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T R L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (8) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 80 15 25 5 5 25 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 88 16 27 5 5 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LMC No RT Channelized? , Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ' Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L i LTR ' I LTR v (vph) 11 11 131 37 C(m) (vph) 1385 1418 590 730 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.22 ' 0.05 95% queue length 0.02 0.02 0.84 0.16 Control Delay 7.6 7.6 12.8 10.2 LOS A A B B ' Approach Delay 12.8 10.2 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 ' 2,0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 1 TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt dpe aency/rfo m/18/ ate Performed: 2/18/O1 alysis Time Period: amm short long Intersection: cr3b7access c Ivrisdiction: fort collins alysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 Forth/South Street: access c Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments �7ajor Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R olume 15 270 185 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 300 205 5 ,Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? 1 1 1 0 ,Lanes Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Approach Northbound Soutnoouna Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Lercent Grade M edian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 'RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration ■ Delay, Approach EB Movement 1 ' Lane Config L v (vph) 16 (vph) 1373 'C(m) v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.04 Control Delay 7.7 ■ LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 lv 0.90 0.90 5 11 0 0 0 0 No 0 0 LR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 I I LR HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 691 0.02 0.07 10.3 B 10.3 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY __OP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: 2 18/01 am pm short long Intersection: 36/access c Jurisdiction: fort co ns Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrn total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 North/South Street: access c Intersection Orientation: EW Major Street -:5(.CAL (� Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 L T R I L Westbound 5 6 T R Volume 5 160 265 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 177 294 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (�) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 5 15 0.90 0.90 5 16 0 0 0 0 No 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 5 21 C(m) (vph) 1274 687 v/c 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.09 Control Delay 7.8 10.4 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.4 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 E APPENDIX D I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY ..SOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: North/South Street: matt mjdpe 2 / 1$,[O 1 am m short long cr36/cin oil fort collins 2001 bkarn total cr36 cinquifoil Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 88 17 6 123 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 97 18 6 136 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade ($) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 9 1 3 2 1 3 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10 1 3 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 3m RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L 1 LTR 1 LTR v (vph) 5 6 14 6 C(m) (vph) 1459 1487 724 772 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.02 Control Delay 7.5 7.4 10.1 9.7 LOS A A B A Approach Delay 10.1 9.7 Approach LOS B A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 f� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt mjdpe �ency/Co.: ate Performed: alysis Time Period: �/18/01 am pm short long Intersection: cr36/cinqui oil urisdiction: fort coll' alysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total —Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 Iorth/South Street: cinquifoil Intersection Orientation: EW �C�)k5� 3 Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R olume 1 86 5 1 56 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 95 5- 1 62 2- ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 edian Type Undivided RT Channelized? 1 1 0 1 1 0 'anes onfiguration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Street: Approach Northbound Soutnoouna 'Minor Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 15 1 5 1 1 4 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 1 5 1 1 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR . Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 fovement ane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 1 1 22 6 C(m) (vph) 1551 1505 824 909 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.02 Control Delay 7.3 7.4 9.5 9.0 A A A A 'LOS Approach Delay 9.5 9.0 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY JP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 2/18/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm short long Intersection: cr acce c Jurisdiction: fort co Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 North/South Street: access c Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 3 110 135 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 122 150 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 L I I LR v (vph) 3 3 C(m) (vph) 1442 830 v/c 0.00 0.00 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 Control Delay 7.5 9.4 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 14 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt mjdpe Cency/Co.: ate Performed: ?�18/01 alysis Time Period: am pm shor long Intersection: r36/access c urisdiction: fort c s alysis Year: 2001 bkgrn total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 forth/South Street: access c Intersection Orientation: EW 3(9cAs(3 Study period (hrs): 0.25 . Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 102 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 edian Type Undivided RT Channelized? 1 1 Lanes onfiguration L T pstream Signal? No iZ) 1 0.90 0.90 83 1 1 0 TR No Street: Approach Northbound Soutnnouna Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R olume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles 'Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 'RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration ■ Delay, Approach EB 1 'Movement Lane Config L v (vph) 1 (vph) 1526 'C(m) v/c 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 Control Delay 7.4 ■LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS i z 0.90 0.90 1 2 0 0 0 0 No 0 0 LR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LR HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 0 914 0.00 0.01 9.0 A 9.0 A APPENDIX C IV ' UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sectveh A _< 10 B >l0and<<15 C > 15 and _< 25 D > 25 and <35 E > 35 and < 50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A <10 B > 10 and < 20 C > 20 and _< 35. D > 35 and _< 55 E > 55 and _< 80 F > 80 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY ..,OP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: North/South Street: matt mjdpe am, am pm short long cr3 cr7 Collins 2001 bkgrnd total cr36 cr7 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 3 56 3 0 59 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 62 3 0 65 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 1 1 0 5 0 8 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1 1 0 5 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 3 0 2 13 C(m) (vph) 1544 1550 787 930 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.04 Control Delay 7.3 7.3 9.6 8.9 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.6 8.9 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 10 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt ency/mjdpe ate Performed: 2/18/01 alysis Time Period:69�m short long Intersection: cr36/cr7 MAurisdiction: collins nalysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd total Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 north/South Street: cr7 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 tVehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R olume 0 41 1 U 44 O Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 45 1 0 48 6 ,Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ,Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No nor Street: Approach Movement 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles 'Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 'RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 0 1 0 4 1 2 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 1 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No No 0 1 0 LTR 0 1 0 LTR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 0 0 1 7 C(m) (vph) 1564 1575 794 908 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 Control Delay 7.3 7.3 9.5 9.0 A A A A 'LOS Approach Delay 9.5 9.0 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 t HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY �.OP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 2/18/01 Analysis Time Period: am p short Intersection: cr3_UTcr9 Jurisdiction: fart collins Analysis Year: 20 bkgrnd Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 North/South Street: cr9 Intersection Orientation: EW 3�q long total Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 21 16 3 48 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 23 17 3 53 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 32 15 11 26 10 69 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 16 12 28 11 76 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T R L TR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 LTR LTR I L T R I L TR v (vph) 11 3 35 16 12 28 87 C(m) (vph) 1545 1583 731 758 1048 812 969 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.09 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.06 0.03 0.11 0.30 Control Delay 7.3 7.3 10.2 9.9 8.5 9.6 9.1 LOS A A B A A A A Approach Delay 9.8 9.2 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt mjdpe Lency/Co.: ate Performed: 18/01 alysis Time Period:/�V�� pm short Intersection: cr36/cr9 urisdiction: collins =Analysis Year: 2001 bkgrnd '-Project ID: 0110 East/West Street: cr36 Iorth/South Street: cr9 Intersection Orientation: EW long 3 (, 140 ( total Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R olume 53 25 58 10 28 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 58 27 64 11 31 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 edian Type Undivided RT Channelized? anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Approach Northbound Soutnnouna Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ,Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Fercent Grade M edian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? 17 9 6 10 10 10 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 18 10 6 11 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T R L TR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 'Lane Config LTR LTR I L T R I L TR v (vph) 58 11 18 10 6 11 22 C(m) (vph) 1580 1517 671 635 1012 680 773 ,v/c 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 95% queue length 0.11 0.02 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.09 Control Delay 7.4 7.4 10.5 10.8 8.6 10.4 9.8 A A B B A B A �LOS pproach Delay 10.2 10.0- Approach LOS B A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 APPENDIX B 0 '4orthlSouth Street: CR-7 =ast/West Street: CR-36 rime Of Day. PM ' Neather: Sunny Yeel"l 171 7/V LL1 Ylov logo IMP$1VN 2472 Wyandotte File Name : CR36&71C1-4-01(neg) Fort )221- .4de Code : 00000367 (9T0) 227-3578 57 Start Date : 01/04/2001 Page :1 unamrtae_ . CA-7 CR-36 CR-7 I CR-36 End Torte Pigh I Sau Thro tlt coun0 LA Pad App- Wetbou Rtph I Thm �� nd Pad App.Riph Nad Thro thboua Pad Eastbound App I Riph I Thro I Pad L.aR App. InL i t LV h_ a Tdal f� � h I s Tdal t � ugh a . Talal t' ug h Tdd . Tew _ PaGa► 1 15 t 10 10,___1.0 1.0°-- 1,0! 1 1.01 _� 1.0 1.0_ :1 1.0, 1.0 1.0i _a t 1.0: 1 16:41i 3 0 2 o s; 1 11 _±-OL_.1A_ 0 o - izl � o _-1.0 a -o--' d ..._, o' 1 16 _ 2 o ie'- 36 17:00 1 0 2 0 3I'_ 15 0.. 17 0 1. 1 2 I 0 14 1 0 15 37 _ Tull ♦ 6- 4 0 S I ,,,2-...._ 3 26 0 _.0.-.. 0 29 0 1 1 .0....._. 6 2 1 30 '3 0 34 ----- -73 17:15 3 0 0 0 31 1 22 0 0 231 0 0 0 0 01 2 8 0 0 10 35 17:30 1 0 1 0 2 1 11 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 12. 26 Qond TdA 8 0 5 0 131 5 59 0 0 04 0 1 1 0 2 3 50 3 0 56 135 Appteh % 61.5 0.0 38.5 0.0 1 7.6 92.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 5.4 09.3 5.4 0.0 ' Total % 5.9 0.0 3.7 0.0 9.61 3.7 43.7 0.0 0.0 47.4 I 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 1.51 2.2 37.0 2.2 0.0 41.5. Out In T01111 e" o: 5': 5i - .. Right 7htoup lea Pads ♦- � 1 2 Natty lutishnitbi LeR Right Pads F. .- 31 1 ._:. 21 1 5.. Out -.6- Talaf_. CR-7 Jan-10-01 11:11A Northern Engineering I IIp soon I VIs 970 221 4159 P_02 iorftSouth Street: CR-7 2472 Wyandotte :He Name : CR36&7LC14-01(neg), :ast/West Stnet: CR-36 Fort Coins co. - Site Code : 00000367 (970)221-357e ime Of � AAA Start Date : 01/04/2001 Neaffw. Surxry Page :1 ' _ .. _. ... CR-7 .. _...- CR3s C7 cage I End Tkne ; Aw leR Pact RO Piro I Ls8 L d I Pod I App. Total Total t faetarl h 1.0, a Total t 10 h 10 : 1.0.__t0�_ a Total t _iq h 10 101. ... 1.0 a 10 Total t. 1.0 t g h 1.0, 1.0: s 1.0.�- I _1.0 1.0_ LO - __._ ,_ 01:45 1 1 2 0 4 1 13 D O 14 0 1 0 0 1 1 13 0 0 14 ' 33 M-00_ 1 0__. 2 0 3' 3 11 0__,..._ 0 0 0 0 0 ._. 0...- 0. ..12 0.. .__0 ....12 . 28 Tdal 2 1 _ 1 0 7 4 24 0 -14_ 0 � - 0 1 0 D 11 t 23 0 0 18 , 82 0815 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 0 0 14 ' 0 0 0 D 0 0 e 0 0 81 22 08:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 8 0 D 0 0 0. 0 8 0 0 8 18 Grand Total 2 1 4 0 7 6 44 0 0 50 0 1 0 0 1 1 41 0 0 42 100 Appoh % 28.6 14.3 57.1 0.0 12.0 88.0 0.0 0.0 1' 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 2.4 07.6 0.0 0.0 Total% 20 1.0 4.0 0.0 7.0I 6.0 44.0 MO 0.0 50.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.01 1.0 41.0 0.0 0.0 420 Out_._.....-h_... ...__..T� RigM Thr" Lett POdo i Y North . `' ... Urnhif0eo ... 'j I b .... 4� �► Left Right Padf -11_.__- of-. -.0 I 2'1 I 11 Out In TOM caa II Jan-10-01 11:12A Northern Engineevingtw wZU eeL 44LOia 1-.UO I I w Ivan un 4oiWSouth Street: CR-9 2472 Wyandoft Re Nam : CRWULC14-01(neg) East/West Street: CR-36 Fod Co3gms Co. Site Code : 00000369 (970) 221-578 rim of Day: Pm Stan Date : 01104=1 Neaffw. Sunny Page : 1 CR-3S CR-M Erd Tim MO. SGUMbolmill Tft-. OW AM; Righ r LjA* F11 A". Plgh I NwDdXWW Theo I La, Ald I API, Pigh EjObourtd Thm LAA Pad App. Int. l f 4 Tc" t I TOM - - _ It g u1.0 s. ToW t Ugh a Total Total Facto t O D t.0 10 0 0 0 .11 1.01 I.o. 1.0 j. io 1.0 1.0 _ 16:46 . 24 2 14 6 401 1 10 1 0 12 2 7 7 0 18 4 5 4 0 13! 61 17:00 17 2 5 0 241 4 10 1 0 15 3 1 2 6 3 2 0 11 - 68 TOW 41- 4 10- 6 ... 5 -462 - ----- 0 27 a 9 17 1 W1 " lb 8 6 0 24 147 17:15 13 3 4 a 20 10 18 0 0 201 3 3 11 D 1171 3 5 2 0 110 75 17:30 15 3 3 0 21 0 10 1 0 11 1 3 3 4 0 10 3 a 2 0 13' 55 I,," Tom 69 10 28 0 105 15 48 3 0 661 11 15 32 1 so 16 21 10 0 471 277 Apprch % 65.7 9.5 24.0 0.0 22.7 72.7 4.5 0.0 1 18.6 25.4 $4.2 1.7 : 34.0 441 21.3 0.0 TOM % 24.9 3.6 9.4 0.0 37.9 5.4 17.3 1.1 0-0 23,13 4.0 5.4 11.6 OA 21.3 5.8 7.6 3.6 0.0 17.01. 0 Out in TOW i0s: 11.1--1 '61 1 -09 Ib 261 R" TIWMQ Left pws 1 4 - i North Ttu LA Right Peas 15 59 as Out In T64- 4-1 '�3 Jan-10-01 11:12A Northern Engineering dordUSS Street: CR-9 2472 Wyandotte 84t/VileSt Stt+eet: CR-36 Fort Cotes co. (970) 221-357e rime or Day: Ann Nead*r. Sunny 970 221 4159 P_04 File Name : CR36&91C1-4.01(negI Site Code : 00000369 Start Date : 011O 2001 ' Page :1 Gougs Printed: U�+tea F40'a"" 8td Tirhe irsow t 1 1.0 w h 1.0 � { 1.0 , s 1.0 � Total I t 1.0'. Ugh 1.0 � 1.0 �- c 1,0 `....._ TAW t_ 1.0 . w h. 1.0 � _ 1.0 to 07:45 6 0 4 0 10 8 4 . 2 0 12 : 1 4 5 0 08:00 2 3. 0 7 1 8 ....... 5.._ .. 0 . 14 2 2 .. 4 . 0 TAW . _. 8 _.2. 2 7 _ _ 0 17 7 12 1 0 28 3 6 9 0 08:15 2 3 1 0 01 0 11 3 0 14I 1 2 3 0 08:30 0 5 2 0 7' 3 5 0 1 9 2 1 5 0 Gland TAW 10 10 10 0 30 10 28 10 1 4B < 6 9 17 0 Fpprch % 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 I 20A 57.1 20.4 2.0 18.6 28.1 511 0.0 TAW % 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 12-1 4.0 11.3 4.0 0.4 19.8 2.4 3.8 6.9 0.0 Ck,mg Opp. iti,' Thro �aR PW TAW t : 1.0 to i.o , 1.61 6 1.6 10 18 11 12 0 8 9 5 15 0 ii 27 16 27 0 6 15 5 12 0 6 16 4 14 0 32 9 25 53 0 42.6 18.4 30.0 0.0 13.0 23.5 10.1 21.5 0.0 Out301 M Ta1W _ . 107 710- Riatit Thr - Lr Pods 1 h cl g � m d •�1 � � _3Io �� c 9r o Left ttRgM POds L.. _ lei 32j i1oj ou M row CR-B AM Wt: TAW Total 41 73 29 58 10 . _ -131 321 56 34 56 135 . 247' 55.1 2 APPENDIX A IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Staley Elementary School development on the short range and long range street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: The development of the Staley Elementary School is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Staley Elementary School will generate approximately 612 daily trip ends, 174 morning peak hour trip ends, and 60 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable. It is expected that no additional traffic signals will be warranted. In the short range future, given development of the Staley Elementary School and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably. In the long range future, given development of the Staley Elementary School, the key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. The short range and long range geometry is shown in Figure 10. Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian and bicycle modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines. According to City transit plan documents, this area is not expected to be served by transit. 18 Transit Level of Service ' Currently, there is no transit service in the area. The Fort Collins 2015 Transit System Map shows no transit service within 1320 feet of this school. The Poudre School District provides school bus ' service for those students who live beyond the school walk area. 17 Legend: — - Denotes Lane A m U Legend: —� - Denotes Lane SHORT RANGE I � � Site l LONG RANGE SHORT RANGE AND LONG RANGE GEOMETRY J N Figure 10 16 TABLE 5 Short Range (2004) Tota I Peak Hour Operation MOM Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation WPM, M MY 15 Using the traffic volumes shoe geometrics, the key intersections condition as indicated in Table analyses are provided in Appendix operate acceptably. in in Figure 8 and the recommended operate in the short range total 5. Calculation forms for these E. The key intersections will Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9, the key intersections operate in the long range total condition as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably. The short range and long range geometry is shown in Figure 10. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix G shows a map of the area that is within one mile of the Staley Elementary School. The one mile radius goes well beyond the service area of this school, especially in the east and west directions. .There will be four pedestrian destinations within a mile of the Staley Elementary School. These are: 1) the residential area southwest of the site (Fossil Lake Village), 2) the residential area southeast of the site (Staley), 3) the residential area north of the site (Willow Brook, Brookfield), and 4) the residential area west of CR9 (Harvest Park, Sage Creek, etc.). Destination #4 is beyond the service area of the Staley Elementary School. Other residences within this radius are not in a concentrated area. This site is in an area type termed "school walking area." The level of service determination assumes that future residential developments (namely, Fossil Lake Village, Willow Brook, Staley, City of Fort Collins Parks) will build their streets and adjacent streets in accordance with Fort Collins Standards. This being the case, pedestrian facilities will exist where they currently do not. This is a reasonable assumption. If this does not occur or is not accepted by the City, then acceptable pedestrian level of service cannot be achieved. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix G. The minimum level of service for "school walking area" is B for all categories, except for the visual interest & amenities category where it is LOS C. With the assumed future pedestrian facilities along future streets, the pedestrian level of service will be acceptable. Bicycle Level of Service Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there is one destination area within 1320 feet of Staley Elementary School. This is the future city park to the west. The park will be adjacent to the school. Therefore, the connection will be direct and may not require the use of on -street bike lanes. It is assumed that CR36 will be built to a minor arterial cross section with 8 foot bike lanes on each side of the street. A bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix G. 14 TABLE 3 Short Range (2004) Background Peak Hour Operation MOVIE- 644 *,",r TABLE 4 Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation 13 13 m a Lo r o NOM. Ln 75/140 �- 40/15 5/5 100/110 Ln Ln Un 45/15 � o 0 r.-) IM AM/PM Rounded to the Nearest 5 Vehicles. Vol Site l J 0 0 0 �- 5/5 70/130 1 /�-5/5 15/10 -1 � } r 100/95 un u-, 15/20 ULn N N SHORT RANGE (2004) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure s J U ° T11 U.1 N o �oLn -5/5 5 1 � 45/15 5/15 5/15 175/270 i 40/15 -� [� f r LOLOU-) oc) � o M N AM/PM Rounded to the Nearest 5 Vehicles. CO. RD. 3 25/30 -� 140/170 35/90 c100, Site `) LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC �15/5 f 180/130 /-10/30 fI u") o Ln Figure 9 12 s 0 0 U 41 /13 46/13 I N O r7 N AM/PM U 42/13 41/12 —�, "") t r cV LO M mM� O) O N N AM/PM CO. / _ /10 Site 00, SHORT RANGE CO. 0000 ' /00 Site LONG RANGE SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 11 /5 - 11/5 7/3 o J_ 14/6 9/4-� 7/3 o Fi N Figure 7 11 s U N Z NOM. 75 135 1/3 —1 92/110 i AM/PM CD � 2/' a 1 /� /6123 t r 861/5 5/17--,k -z� N SHORT RANGE (2004) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 5 J Cal N 0 LO '.%L— 5/5 f 265 /185 5/15 160/270 i AM/PM Rounded to the Nearest 5 Vehicles. Z Ln �Ln 15/5 U') "' —165/125 + 10/30 RD. 36 10/25 —� } 130/165 i o o Ln 25/85 o LO LO 00 - CV LONG RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 we] TRIP DISTRIBUTION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE N LE N LE 9 Figure 4 Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Staley Elementary School based upon the service area provided by the Poudre School District. The distribution may moderate slightly based upon how development occurs within the service area. it is expected that in the short range future, the service area will extend beyond the described limits, especially to the west of CR9. Figure 4 shows the trip distributions used in the traffic assignment process. Background Traffic Projections Figures 5 and 6 show the respective short range and long range background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range and long range future horizons were obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP and various traffic study prepared for this area of Fort Collins. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 7 shows the site generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 8 shows the total (site plus background) short range peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Figure 9 shows the total long range morning and afternoon peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants ' As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Signals will not be warranted at the analyzed intersections. Operation Analysis Capacity analyses were performed at the key intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year 2004 condition. The long range analysis reflects a year 2020 condition. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5, the key intersections ' operate in the short range background condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6, the key intersections operate in the long range background condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. 8 T L-- SITE PLAN r�� A& N NO SCALE Figure 3 ' III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Staley Elementary School is a school development, located south of CR36 between CR9 and CR7 in Fort Collins. Figure 3 shows a site plan of the Staley Elementary School. The short range analysis ' (Year 2004) includes development of Staley Elementary School and an appropriate increase in background traffic, due to other potential development in the area. The long range analysis year is considered to be 2020. The site plan shows a single access to CR36. This access is approximately 3200 feet west of CR9. The site plan also shows a public ' street that intersects with CR36 and wraps around the site on the east and south. This street would connect to streets in the developing Fossil Lake Villages. It is also likely that the Staley Residential ' Development (to the southeast of the Staley Elementary School) will connect to this street. This street will also line up with future Cinquefoil Avenue in the Willow Brook development to the north. There will be no school access to this street. The site access will line up with future Access C in the Willow Brook development to the north. ' The service area for the Staley Elementary School is bordered by CR9 on the west, CR7 on the east, Harmony Road on the north, and Fossil Creek Reservoir to the south. It is expected that there will be minimal school related traffic that will reach CR9 and CR7. For this reason, ' the CR36/Site Access/Access C intersection and the CR36/Cinquefoil intersection were evaluated. ' Trip Generation ' Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by ' the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. TABLE 2 Trip Generation _ 1.02 612 W: "�• ♦Y g4 0.17 102 0.12 72 � :C 0.05 30 0.05 _ 30 520 Elementary Schad dements st 6 Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities along CR36. When CR36 is improved to its minor arterial cross section, it will have the required 8 foot bike lanes on each side of the street. Transit Facilities There are no transit routes within 1320 feet of the proposed Staley Elementary School. TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation rM IM48AN"TurY F .a N ._ 'v T • h..y` NB LT B - .w ..w B NB T B A NB RT A A CR36/CR9 (stop sign) SB LT B A SB T/RT A A EB LT A A WB LT A A NB LT/T/RT A A SB LT/T/RT A A CR36/CR7 EB LT A A (stop sign) WB LT A A 5 0 0 0 0 U —10/15 o_o_o f 28/48 10/3 53/10 25/21 i N Ln 58/16 AM/PM RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC COUNTS R 6/5 N�Lr) �- 44/59 + 0/0 CO. RD. 36 013 � f 41 % 6 1/3--\ o 0 N Figure 2 9 L I cb I � -_-J COUNTY RD. 36 Staley Elementary School 1 " = 2000' L Fossil Lake Ol La N SITE LOCATION 3 Figure 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Staley Elementary School is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. ' Land Use ' Land uses in the area are primarily either vacant (agriculture) or residential. Residential units (Fossil Lake village) are under construction to the south and west of the site. Land adjacent to the site is flat (<2% grade) from a traffic operations perspective. The center of Fort Collins lies to the northwest of the proposed Staley Elementary School. Roads The primary street near the Staley Elementary School site. is County Road 36 (CR36). CR36 is to the north of the proposed Staley Elementary School. It is a east -west street designated as a minor arterial in the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, CR36 has a two-lane cross section with minimal shoulders. Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic intersections is shown in Figure 2. in Appendix A. The traffic data at January 2001. Existing Operation at the CR36/CR9 and CR36/CR7 Raw traffic count data is provided these intersections was collected in The counted intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 2, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual is also provided in Appendix B. The key intersections operate acceptably overall during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Pedestrian Facilities There are no pedestrian facilities along either side of CR36. It is expected that as properties in this area are developed, sidewalks will be installed as part of the street infrastructure. V I. INTRODUCTION ' This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development of the Staley Elementary School. The proposed Staley Elementary School is located south of CR36, approximately 0.65 miles west of CR9 (Ziegler Road) in Fort Collins, Colorado. ' During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultant (RB & B), the Poudre School District - Support Services, and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering Staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines. The study involved the following steps: ' - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; ' - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. I LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 4 3. Site Plan ............................................ 7 4. Trip Distribution .................................... 9 5. Short Range (2004) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 10 6. Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Traffic ....... 10 7. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ..................... 11 8. Short Range (2004) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........... 12 9. Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Traffic ............ 12 10. Short Range and Long Range Geometry .................. 16 APPENDIX A Recent Peak Hour Traffic B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions C Short Range Background Traffic Operation D Long Range Background Traffic Operation E Short Range Total Traffic Operation F Long Range Total Traffic Operation G Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 Land Use ............................................. 2 Roads................................................ 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 2 Existing Operation ................................... 2 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 2 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 5 Transit Facilities ................................... 5 III. Proposed Development ................................. 6 TripGeneration ...................................... 6 Trip Distribution .................................... 8 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 8 Trip Assignment ...................................... 8 Signal Warrants ...................................... 8 OperationAnalysis ................................... 8 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 14 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 14 Transit Level of Service ............................. 17 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 18 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 5 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 6 3. Short Range (2004) Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 13 4. Long Range (2020) Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 13 5. Short Range (2004) Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 15 6. Long Range (2020) Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 15 STALEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO FEBRUARY 2001 40 Prepared for: Poudre School District 2407 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034