Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutELBRADER SUBDIVISION - PDP/FDP - 21-01 - CORRESPONDENCE -Light & Power 2 No Comments Natural Resources 8 PFA 9 Police 3 Zoning 1 No Issues- No Comment at this time. No Comments No Comments, Issue Contact: Bruce Vogel Issue Contact: Doug Moore Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, // *SEVE OLT City Planner WaterMastewater Department 1. Are the adjacent lots in the Wildwood Subdivision Lots 9 & 10, as shown, or 10 & 11 (see the plat of Wildwood Subdivision, 1st Filing). Technical Sevices Department 1. The outside boundary and legal description do close. There are 2 calls in the legal description that do not match the boundary. 2. There is a typo error in the legal description. The section # is incorrect. 3. The Southwest Corner, as described, does not match the City's records. AT&T Broadband 1. AT&T Broadband would like to see the existing 6' wide utility easement along Cedarwood Drive continue south through Lot 1. Also, can the existing 10' wide utility easement at the northwest corner of the Elbrader Subdivision be continued to the south, along the west side of this.lot? The Building Inspection Department has no comments. The Advance Planning Department has no comments. The Post Office has no comments. Excel Energy (Public Service) has no comments. Engineering 4 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Please correct plat wording. See attached plat language. 5 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Please label adjacent property owners where information is missing. 6 Issue Contact: Katie Moore The scale is a bit off. Please correct this. 7 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Please see plat for additional comments. 10 Issue Contact: Katie Moore Sanitary sewer easement: From what I understand, there are two separate types of easements existing; please see attached agenda item summary for more information. Please provide documentation of what exists. I think the reception number given for the sewer easement is incorrect, and is instead the number referring to the quit claim deed. 11 Issue Contact: Katie Moore A Development Agreement will most likely be needed due to stormwater concerns. .�. STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collin> AYRES ASSOC. Date: 8/2/01 BRIAN NELSON 3665 JEK PKWY. BLDG 2, #200 FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for ELBRADER REPLAT, TYPE 1 (LUC) #21-01, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Current Planning 12 Issue Contact: Steve Olt The following comments were received from the identified departments and outside reviewing agencies: City Right -Of -Way Department 1. The sanitary sewer easement is recorded in Larimer County @ Reception #96054959. A copy of this. Deed of Easement is attached. Stormwater Utility 1. . The applicant's engineer should refer to the Prospect Road S.I.D. drainage study. This may determine if on -site detention is required. The standard is to detain for 100-year runoff and release at the 2-year historic rate. 2. Water quality extended detention is also required to treat runoff prior to it being discharged off -site. 3. The grading along lot lines with adjacent properties is usually critical in these in -fill situations; therefore, some off -site contours and spot elevations will be needed to correctly verify grading. 4. The entire site is located in a low-lying area which receives runoff from a drainage area to the west. Development on this property may cause a rise in the 100-year water surface elevation, which would impact surrounding buildings. This could result in the property being difficult to develop and will require additional analysis. Otherwise, the standard drainage and erosion control report is required and must be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. The report will need to be approved prior to release of a building permit.