HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPANJER OFFICE BUILDING - PDP - 25-01 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)Planninq
Curious as to why the Town of Johnstown has to approve your irrigation
system. Do we, Fort Collins, have veto power if their standards and
requirements are not as stringent as ours?
2. The Site Plan is missing some important information, such as the proposed
retaining wall along the south property line between this project's parking lot
and the lot to the south. Not all required handicapped ramps are shown. It is
essential that the Site Plan reflect all site improvements.
3. There is an existing shed, assumed to belong to the Cornerstone Church, that
is more on the Spanjer Office property than on the church property. How is this
to be handled?
4. See red -lined plans for additional comments.
It is possible to schedule an administrative public hearing for this development
request; however, there are still some issues that need to be addressed prior to the
hearing. We could hold the hearing the week of May 27th but we would need
revisions for staff to review (per the attached Revision Routing sheet) no later
than the week of May 13th. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you
re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this
project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6341.
Yours �Tr/ullyy,
4Steve
Olt,
City Planner
Page 7
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols
91
Plant Note #7. This site is too small for phasing. If the buildings are going to be
constructed at the same time, the landscaping should be all done at the same time
If construction will be in two phases, please show phase lines on both site and
landscape plans.
Topic: General
131
See plant note #10 - it is referencing the Town of Johnstown.
The following comments were offered at staff review on April 17":
Engineering
1. There are discrepancies between plans for this development. Coordinate all
plans for consistency.
2. The variance request appears to be OK. This may require some relocation of
utilities, which will be at the owner's/developer's expense.
3. The Site Plan is difficult to read. It should reflect the geometrics information that
is on the utility plans, such as curb returns and radii at the driveway
intersections. The driveways do not tie into streets at a 90 degree angle.
4. Please check with the Poudre Fire Authority regarding the proposed bollards
at the east end of the internal driveway. They will determine what type of bollard
is acceptable.
5. It appears that an off -site temporary construction easement will be needed to
construct the retaining wall for the parking lot in this project.
6. The utility plans appear to be adequate to take this request to public hearing.
However, some revisions are needed prior to the hearing.
Stormwater
1. The water quality pond outlet needs to be reconfigured.
2. The utility plans appear to be adequate to take this request to public hearing.
However, some revisions are needed prior to the hearing.
Page 6
Department: Natural Resources
Topic: Natural Resources
Issue Contact: Doug Moore
74
Trash Enclosure -
Please include a detail of the trash enclosure with the next submittal.
REPEATED COMMENT 1/1612002 ***
Department: PFA
Issue Contact: Michael Chavez
58
Address Numerals - Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the
property, and posted with a minimum of 6-inch numerals on a contrasting
background. 97 UFC 901.4.4
59
Water Supply - No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire
hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an
approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of
water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 97 UFC 901.2.2.2
92
Water Supply requirement still need to be addressed. The location of the fire hydrant
needs to be on the site plan..
Department: Police
Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom
90
The lighting plan needs to be reworked to provide greater security and less light
spillage. Every lot has inadequate lighting with several also having excess.
Topic: Landscape Plan
132
No lighting information to evaluate landscaping/lighting impacts on security and
safety issues.
Department: Stormwater Utility
Topic: Drainage
134
No comments.
Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Page 5
Topic: Utility Plans
16
Repeat: Provide all existing and proposed ROW, property lines and easements with
dimensions. See checklist E-4. Label on all sheets.
4/17/2: Repeat.
37
Repeat: Show details, dimensions for the retaining wall & access ramps on the
south and west sides of the building.
4/17/2: Please address or respond why this is not necessary.
40
Repeat: Add detail for the trash enclosure retaining wall. Make sure footer is inside
the property line. Will you need a temporary construction easement to dig on the
neighboring property?
4/17/2: Your response to this comment was to "reference the site plan". No detail
was shown on the site plan as stated. Please add the detail for the trash enclosure
to the Utility Plans.
50
Repeat: Update all details to current LCUASS. See Appendix A. See redlines.
Add the words "On -Site" to the on -site curb details - see redlines. Provide details 7-
31, 7-20a, 7-20b, 16-1, and any other detail as required by the plans.
4/17/2: Still need details 7-31 and 16-1.
113
Cover Sheet: Remove the word "Final' from the title. Center the date under the
legal description.
4/17/2: Repeat. Please remove the word "Final' from the title.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz .
93
Contact Light & Power with electric load requirements.
Page 4
4/17/02: The plat language needs to be updated in a couple areas, please see
redlines. Needs one tie to a section corner, the Notice of Other Doc's needs to be
shown correctly, and the easements don't appear to match the utility plans. Please
see the attached Plat Language handout or call if you, have questions.
105
1/23/02: Title Block needs to go along the right hand margin.
4/17/02: Repeat.
118
1/23/02: Provide 1 tie to a section corner.
4/17/02: Repeat.
133
Remove the shed from the plat. See redlines.
Topic: Site Plan
21
Repeat: Show general location of signs.
4/17/02: Repeat.
55
Repeat: Show all ROW, easements, property lines & setback requirements.
Remove all the unnecessary dimensioning - looks more like an architectural drawing
than a site plan.
4/17/2: Easements still do not match the utility plans and plat.
ill
Repeat: Still does not match the Utility Plans. Very hard to read! Too much
dimensioning and only 2 line weights make it impossible to clearly define what's
going on. Remove all the unnecessary dimensioning, add a legend, and coordinate
with the Utility Sheet. I can provide good examples of what a site plan should look
like if you need to see one. See redlines.
4/17/2: Repeat. Still very hard to read. Line weights are too similar, still missing a
legend, label leaders are excessive and confuse the plan, bollards not shown, the
14' utility easement is mislabeled and the 5' utility easement on the north side is
missing. Please check to make sure the storage building envelopes is not in this
new easement. Does not match the plat. Please see redlines.
Page 3
106
1/23/02: Need to submit a variance request for the combined Ped Access/Utility
easement.
4/17/02: The variance request was routed to Light & Power, Stormwater,
Water/Wastewater and mailed to PSCO/Excel, Qwest, AT&T, and the FCLWD. Only
two of the above had comments or concerns. The variance has been routed to Cam
McNair for his final approval.
From Terry Farrill/FCLWD: There are District water meter pits located within
the easement. The meter pits cannot be located under the sidewalk or within
10 feet of landscaping, such as trees. The relocation of the meter pits must
be done in accordance with District requirements and standards.
From Dennis Greenwalt/AT&T: AT&T has existing 2" PVC ducts along your
proposed route which are empty. I spoke with Dennis on the phone and he
said that you may relocate those lines and suggested putting them behind the
telephone peds.
We will be holding a Utility Coordination Meeting for your project prior to start of
construction. All utility relocations will be at the owner/developer's expense.
135
Site/Landscape/Utility plans - Show concrete sidewalk along the east side of the
property to the north property line. There is a section missing, see redlines.
Topic: Landscape Plan
122
Repeat: Show and label all utilities, easements, ROW, etc. Show and label the
utility easement and ped access easement separately. Label Fire Access
Easement. The fire lane requires a 13.5' vertical clearance over the driveway. The
trees on NE corner of the access drive will have to be kept trimmed back or pruned
properly as they mature to keep the lower canopy open.
4/17/02: Missing a 5' utility easement along the north property line and a drainage
easement in the SE corner.
Topic: Plat
103
1/23/02: Incorrectly submitted. Must be resubmitted for review. Needs to show the
building envelopes, the language needs to be updated (see attached), Notice of
Other Doc's missing, Attorney's Cert missing, benchmark missing, and all additional
easements requested by Light and Power are missing. More comments to follow
when correctly submitted.
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
Land Images
c/o Trista Sigler
215 W. Magnolia, Suite 202
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Date: 4/19/2002
Staff has reviewed your revisions re -submittal documentation for SPANJER OFFICE
BUILDING, #25-01, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning
Issue Contact: Steve Olt
75
Dennis Greenwalt of AT&T Broadband (cable TV) indicated that they have facilities
along the west side of South College Avenue which may be in conflict with the
sidewalk.
77
A copy of a comment letter received from Terry Farrill of the Fort Collins -Loveland
Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation District is attached to this
comment letter.
89
Current Planning's comments are on red -lined plans that are being forwarded to
the applicant.
Department: Engineering
Topic: General
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
104
1/23/02: Show ALL easements, building envelopes, property lines, ROW, utilities,
etc, all sheets (Landscape/Utility/Site/Plat). See Checklist E-4.
4/17/02: Plan types do not match. See redlines.
Page 1