Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSIDEHILL (JOHNSON PROPERTY) - ODP - 32-01A - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSOVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Johnson Property FORT COLLINS, COLORADO Trk I „w.� i " �! PROPERTY BOUNDARY/ LEGEND LIMIT OF DEVELOPMENT I L. �' ° ' � Rwo-xl Iuwrw namxsenw MATGHLINC MATGHLINI= ` r rtuM aD Neemenw LAND USE SUMMARY ZONING ACREAGE DENSITY UNITS Ulbea ENam ICWeIeO Low MMed NalOhbahox! Medlem Mixed Nei9hhwhnod Im.111i 85.51 Aa 2.0 DWAC. M".. 93.92A 9.04.0 DWAC. :iihil c. 11G-15.0 DWAC. 12.22M. NA 171 Maxlmom UNb 470-7W UNm 308-386 UNITS NA TOTAL 217.35 M. 949-1309 UNITS OVERALL PROJECT SUMMARY TOTAL PARCEL 226.87 ACRES DEDICATED ARTERIAL ROW. 9.52 ACRES GROSS PARCEL 217.3E ACRES ® THE JESSUP FARM WILL BE MAINTAINED AS A RURAL CHARACTER LIMITED USE PARCEL. FINAL SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND COVENANTS cro[a•W No. \ WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF SPECIFIC SITE PLAN. USES ALI/Im 91nTYLnON nTIN MAN 5AlGIATON IWILL BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING PERMITTED USES IN THE ` �� RMNT-M IUMfI-avT GOIH MPC QI INDUSTRIALZONE: \� Y 1, OFFICES. FINANCIAL SERVICES, AND CLINICS 2. MIXED -USE DWELLING UNITS I9y I 00000 ` Am µ Cwrm OI, 3. ARTISIAWPHOTOGRAPHY AND GALLERY/STUDIObAB 4. PLANT NURSERIES r \ eT�T a� uNb • S. BED AND R BREAKFAST FACILITIES AND SMALL ANIMIAL CLINICS • ` ` B BED AND BREAKFAST Exlsnnao4e ' CENTER 8 EQUIPMENT MENT RENTAL WITHOUT OUTDOOR STORAGE -- - - `\ Z YMnRECREATIONAL USES 'Jl TRATMM m.RR W B ..,rv� '. / "all M 1 E�� Ojy •• .Yl SYEI?tl AR X.IQMTK IN � � J�� :. �vARFMEM Wp^ J I NAI L919eIM lu l'Ihnnl Y� v ii Jh •toner Dial �� � LuI, LOW MIXED NEIGHBORHOOD (5-8 DU/,NC,) .p �„ a -- I 93,92ACRES 11 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION 470-762 UNITS It" rT0 POUDRE VALLEY TRAIL SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 4• , 11 SYSTEM h' SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED erw..rwcl-ar— ®��� 0� MULTI -FAMILY NIm ``�.: �� f CONNECTION LIMITED RETAIL ° I TO SHARP '� A , POINT DRIVE —PROPERTY BOUNDARY/ O O O O O 000000000 pip?"*�� �, C) O I . ,,a<, LIMIT OF DEVELOPMENI O 00 000000 O O O O��4L COLLECTOR O'_ COLLECTOR i„ ❑ �►�� +�� .�. MAT,_HL�M INC ATGHLINE ' `6 won 4 SPRING r O O O \ on O CREEK 'I I O O 1a 5UF3DIVISION "! � " \ ❑ �j ' O O O �� ❑y O 00 Oe C O O GOLLGTQR'O O O , / :,t 1000' BUFFER FROM %ll I - - O C3 4A. 0O O O O QQ O / /� WASTEWATER TREATMENT 4 0 0 0 Q Q Q O / PLANT (NO BUILD ZONE WITH UilfiAN ESIAFES CLUSTER' ❑ O / !� /�, RESTRICTIVE OVERLAY) :,,)NI DESIGNA11ON1 ❑ O $'� ' G i 32.5 ACOO(0OU7A(GROSS MAX.W U D IIA, NET MAX ❑5,0 OPLNI $PACE Mill, I P " 7 .MAXIMUM UNITS :. © i - _ NOS`" �o SOFTTRAIL w \ JN,LEFAMILV 4 / �' / aomo r I e 1`� V „g .�! TACkdED Q �. .. % / / / `- 1 FUTURE RIb A ROX ALONG DRAKE AND fl I ❑O O. PROJECT BOUNDARY/ 2. ONTHISPLA,+NaAND LINM&EiN THE us D D�ixREA r C I EXISTING FOX DEN " ' £' / ! oAl TIONB ARE rER c - i`7 /R` LIMIT OF DEVELOPMENT eEAalNss AND vISTANCEs FROM THE ALTO PROJECT . .gyp B AND 50' BUFFER -' . --{N- ' / +++,,, SURVEY PREPARED BY JR ENSINmxNS BOUNpAF,Y/ I 'P:, �. /jCdC7t �� i Tvmnova ;rc 'i d' '> �5 THE LeSAL DESCRIPTION INCLL� N THESE LIMIT � I / [) r D EN7 MEDIUM MIXED NEIGHBORHOOD \�, A % Q / / ` DRAKE WATER PLNy5I5 THE RECORD LEbAI A5 PROVIDEp ECM qg-1s DuwD) �. RECLAMATION 6T Tee cL�T. y� 25.71 ACRES � h fi 1 J8 J _AGENC. °� � FACILITY BOOK 7383 PAGE 143 t I i r °� y. 30B 386 UNITS - 0 O I I' SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED O �. THE JOHN80N FARM SITE I % APPROXIMATE SINGLE SINGLFFAMILV ATTACHED 'X EN1 ND 0 MULTI -FAMILY MITIGATION / A AREA B DETENTION AREAAll / I AXwiNa wereBDRAKE ROAD I Igi n- 0 O,O 0-'0 0 O O O 00 i 70 xjsFIN ... : " t !I .:,,'.»,°m ... _ a�rM i ; �;..,.".....'_i'. ..,'...• _ ,,,.: 1 .iI.n ,.�7,4�Qj,, L4"'I A: Ii_0,..._.w it -it «. 6xlennn1rww1I N -;` �` `�,L�-'I�` ,• _ .if''. xamImm. ;u Lx Exon E1Ac IGDEN FARM SUBDIVI51R I 4 - J .J.-.ameS�ffi"- �an� y jrr Ei Ninth .x Qaom 'e000z Io3 SHEET G OF G 3o0-warCN i I ,A, THORE H.r.eJ I II4P b UJAME SCALE °1"=U200`3� OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH. RANGE 88 WEST OF THE BTH P.Y., WtIMER COUNTY, COLORA00, WHICH, CONSIDERING THE SOUTH LINE OF SAD SECTION 20 AS SEWING EAST AND WEST. AND WITH ALL BEWINGS CONfANED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO, IS COMNNED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES W1aCH BEGIN AT A POINT WHICH BEARS EAST 1337.40 FEET, AND ADNN NOD51'00"W 1748.60 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20. AND RUNS THENCE NC51'00W 1479.02 FEET M A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE UISRNG PNLRO uD; THENCE ALONG MAD SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 55012WE 5042.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAD SECTION 20; THENCE ALONG SAD SOUTH LINE. WEST 2587.88 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY DEEDED TO CAROILL IN BOON 13W AT PAGE 143; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY 1OWNDARY OF SYD PROPERTY DEEDED TO CWGILL, N0034'00'E W9.79 FEET, AND AGAN WIT14.00-W 193./0 FEET, MD AD IN N5023b01Y 3M.30 FEET, AND AGAN "724'00^N 246.15 FEET, AND AGAIN NW "'WIN 308.40 FEET. AND AGAN NSR25'30'11 722.12 FEET, MD MOAN N77-15'00*W 38.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. MD A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN THE WEST ONE-1MLF Of SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RNIGE BB WEST OF THE BTH P.M., IARIMER COUNTY, COLORA00 WHICH CONSIDERING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE- WARfER OF SAID SECTION 20 M SWING N90 DOWE MD WITH ALL BEWINCS CONTAINEDHEREIN REIATNE THERETO 15 CONTAINED WITHIN THE BDUNAtY LINES WHICH BEGIN AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAD SECTION 20 AND RUN THENCE NOTODWE 1337.40 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH ONE Of THE SAO SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED IN BOON 1383 AT PAGE 143 OF THE L TIMER COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SAD TRALT ALONG M [OUSTING FENCE LINE, NOP51'00'W 174B.80 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID TRACT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EMISTING FENCE LINE NOT 51'W'W 1480.05 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RNLROAD; THENCE ALONG THE SAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE N50'11'57'W 1359.M FEET MD AGAIN ALONG THE ARC Of A 2914,93 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF DISTMCE 409.71 FEET, THE LONG CHORD Of W19CH BEARS NW10'21V 409.38 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST UNE DF THE NORTHWEST CNE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE S0(r45'4O'E 17M.48 FEET ALCNG THE WEST UNE OF THE MAD NORTHWEST ONE-OU ER; THENCE SD035'15-E 2651.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PROJECT TEAM LAID M1AM,RB, TRMFlG BINIJ'�l, vorwh, Thar Fe. 4 Jones, Arc. TMPk a Twespswass, 6g4rrhq IMI IMII ]treR,'YN NOB = Hen Hwsl LFM sa,laer, a ta,a o OaBO1 LeeaNeq "Nowei OPJBC Dead 44s-TYO (r1W sM l llwm wasa / areq ww. CYE�6. Halt Dais, PJ1. Rv110PO1 • r barn saes f -4" IBMa. Bun. Ho .icon fsrysy a,1s vrma, Roo, w =w LaAbtl. G .b eai power. LaareY sass (TAR) 40I+9000 IYAJ 4466606 .es, a..g, or. Jm eai Jm /Marna i.s P2. OWNER snow a rNCn, LLL. 9M52 calM Avewis Fort LOIIYw.. aotaB flat a Ia,, elan A. Y , IK o,o OWNER'S CERTIFICATION M MORLeId DCGLV Htl®Y LB[TTY THAT Nl! /R M VMA aWGtO m REAL Few0i tAeaNBm oN Time 3N! 1tAN NO DD IGt®r fAtTRY TINT LY! AC04TT TN[ aalDmdl6 NO sLeIIUCTIDIb B[F PaRM oN SAID RAN. OrRBIs CI®C PNFb. LLL. PAR Stan A..LeHaan, rWage NOTARY n STAR or, ca1L141oo, LARmlt coli M Fa1P1011Y FITRIIOR W KAatlRIDem BtTc ME This DAY Go 2001 NAK HnlCss Mr N40 AIO aTILAL !P!L NM rE1MMla1 GIPIArs PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APPROVAL Arrltavl9 !" M RYllllle NO I m BONND ar TK CITY Co FORT c M!k 001,41 DO THIS DAY OF eECK117ARY m M M1N40II0 .40 SCMtl 1110 m a«I OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Johnson Property FORT COLLINS, COLORADO CONTEXT DIAGRAM SCALE, I' . 500' LEGEND HINDICATES fvnwe 51MI FeoeeTelA Ale 511 L CoraecTlw v� IND1cnro rvnAm mRrsBr INTO rearaBeD DevhDorrm C� VICINITY MAP PROJECT NOTES 1. The, J on Property o all dnvolopwor4 plan will as a resldontlal mixed-uee development w8hln Four zoning dbtrlcts, Irxl strlal (1), U-ban btato OBJ, Law Domi MUudLes Re,ltl.ntlal (LF?0. hy.dbm Domi Ml.@d Resldontlal RMW. The proposed aomnuntty will he Nde a mix of RMI"M1a1 Howhg typoo ranging from wit1-Pon11y to Nng1.-Pan11y wNh a laas .tr.ot dstrlat mtensoi Tlnlborliro with a ..It Mlghborhood cdnmer.lal cantor and higher dorlstty roill4onlbl. There will as, flue (5) wtrnslghlwrfxwtls/dbtrlct, to weakdorn " overall commimmu Into Intimate nolghlowhootls. 91na11 packet parks act as central activtty two, within each sub -not borhood/dletrkt. 2. The B to 10-acre neighborhood park will in, aodlcotad to fine Olty of Fort Collha. The City will kmtall and maintain the nelgWwrbod pork. All "citlikommom open specs meal and orbrlal/collector/corrector etrubcopos will as malntalnsd by a home ...r a as,oclatlan unless othomiso a ptod by the Llty of Port Collins fin malntsnancs. Homeowner's association rosporelbla for .row removal on fins mtorlal Malow." and all bicycle/pad trolls. City will rot take an malnt.." of arterial streetecape or eldenalk par coy coals. 5. Motor UHIM9 Plane we to be subm8tod for CIN rovlow h canfmctlon with Ffiaes I Devolopmant Plan. 4. All pWlle atrooto will ion a.el d W mood h t or oxeosd City 5tantlmds m1.s. vmlances one gantod to allow a r.dwtbn inCI 9tandmds. Exact location of «ues points ancortastreet .119 rlls w111 be dst.rmlred with a sulanittal and review of PDP. 5. The proposed Iwal owns and densities ahoy an this plan we estimates of as niI10 meM potential. Approval of this ODP by W Clty does not awatltute final approval of these lard was, dati an do eltio. Radian, ?lather land was. must be approved according to the proc.dres, processes, an critsrla of the CI d Port Col line Land Use Coda. e. Fire hydrants will b ; provided as required by Po are Fire hdhortty Standards 1. Demi 1e based an goes arranges. & All bloab In the MMN will meat the aurrent block staaaa-de 1041"10 Cants. 4. Residential aevebpment In the 1-MN District Yell hove an overall mInhvm average domlIN of flue (5) awaiting Imps par net acra of ro.1contal land, mad an overall maximum ..go tlanslLy not to exceed eight (D) awaiting colt, per «re. 10. 1losldantlal aovolopmont In Ulo MMN Dbtrlct ,halt have an overall mmlmlm wIii dowl ity of twelve 02) wailing mils per net acre of residential and. 11. Residential developme t In the UC district oM11 havo an avarall mmtlmum c orage asmity not to excsad two duelling colts par acre. The dort y within the UE abtrlat may how ro r bs clustered pravldad the cluster portlan of the aide dose not exceed flvo(S) mlts par not acrs. The location and ..tent of each cIai area. we to be determined at the PDP level of review. 12. The proposal boundary corr.atlou conform to minimum street access requirements. Fiethor Infernal corrections to nnJ.r colbctor streets, minor cellnctm streets, and Corrado- streets shot ba revlewsel In a doea with Land Lbe Cods Section 5AB at the time of Nho Project D IopmsM Plan. 15. All axlsthg tress on No Jesmp Fmnrtead and the Jchrean Fcrmstsad will ion proeervatl, Accifl wily, fha grouping of tree, I«atoll of" the ..bthg lerleelkv In this, central portion of the stts will ba deelganlwd as a %mall woodlotx anal w111 as gN.n a bWfor ... of 25-foet. All otlei existing Mess will ba pr.snrved m mttl9atod ml,w obwwiee approved by the Clty Forester at tM for a speclfk alto Wvslopnvnt plan. 14. If futAre tranelt stop. we raqulred along TNlbarlina Blvd. naditional pull-out ROW may as raalulrad INDEX SHEET I OF 2 COVER 5HEET SHEET 2 OF 2 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Ja111psCompany B.WMMGIwdaItO101103 SHEET 1 OF 2 w.eywawen. sin THOM Hnvi v.l Nn TIMOP] 1] IR 01 //' xue xl1 I]11-01 COVER SHEET .. The Cumberland Companies, Inc. 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 293 • Englewood. CO 80111 3031779-9009 . Fax 303/220-1818 January 16, 2002 Troy Jones, City Planner Current Planning Department 281 N. College Avenue P. O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Re: The Johnson Property — Overall Development Plan Dear Mr. Jones: RECEIVED (''JRRENT PLANNING, I recently reviewed the plans for the proposed Johnson Property Overall Development Plan (ODP) with representatives of the James Company. After careful• review, I=ain'.-'.'., writing to express our company's support of this proposed ODP. The lot sizes, product mix and plan layout are a positive compliment to those land uses and densities proposed in other projects within this area of town. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 741-1113 should you have any questions.-- Thank you for allowing me to comment on this project. 4 tre .. Cordially, r Brock Chapman Vice President 4S BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA --. FUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worliiheet rOastNaCun"'�t`54 CCanpm i1, OAqua:mute y Minuet ¢n' :,?mend - r,`TmTennet - CSU Trans! Center 41 18 35 FooBas FaSNW Mal 27 15 36 Fan GArm Frigh Sdmd - 1.0 11 15 Ommso a, Fat Ca&s 4.5 19 30 Taut Twel Tame 63 124 197 Service Level Standards Worksheet r�aa-'E-ate Wa,.a—.ttss-a a 'fQrden Need Ux and Rema do of : ^k Stdd -soh-.' �Fd3 Sandard, Pours dW semis 18 haas 16 taus x weekday Frepunwy of service 15 nmutes 20 mhuta x Tra+d Tore Fader 20x 2.0x x Peak Load Fact <_ 11 S12 x 3 of 4=LOSB v d r 4 x it 0 O .-1 U u u u I� 10 N - 6 e - Y _ f V __- b p v V C j 1 ,Vyy\ U N a �F2 oaoo HCS200u: Uosignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO -NAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,at: Michael cy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich. P.E. Performed: 7/1 O1 [sia Time Period: sect Son: Ora a/Access H sdiction: Fort cgjli 5 Yale Year: short(22natot J btgr al act ID: a340 /West street: Drake h/South Street: ACceas H reaction orientation: EN Study period (hzs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments r Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movexnt 1 2 3 1 e 5 6 L T R L T R me 125 e00 555 20 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ly Mov Rate, HFR 131 421 584 21 ant Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- an Type TWLTL hannelized? - s 1 1 1 0 iguration L T TR ream Signal? No No r Street: Approach ,Northbound Southbound Movement I 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R me 20 130 . Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 'ly Flo. Rate, HFR 21 136 :ant Heavy Vehiclea 2 2 ant Grade M 0 0 n Storage 1 ad Approach: Exists? No Storage '.hannelized? 0 0 �guia[i0n LR Delay. Queue Length, and Level of Service 'oech EB WB I Northbound Southbound went 1 e 1? 8 9 1 10 11 12 : Config L I I LF lih) 132 157 (Vph) 973 460 .0.13 0.3e queue length 0.46 1.50 r01 Delay 9.3 16.8 A C oath Delay 16.8 'oech LOS C HC52000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 .hew J. Delich .hew J. Delich, P.E. APPENDIX H ®�a000 ©. • oo�000 oa0000 00000 _: o00000 a00000 PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA 3MCF2000: Uo.vIhalvneo intE rseccvm:s HCS20U0: unaignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY_ ]nalysc: Michael .kgency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/11 . lnalysis Time Period: am�p�J :nte[section: Orake/Access F Jurisdiction; Fort Co ns Analysis Year: short on bkgr total' ?roject ID: 0140 3a s� Street: Drake Noh Street: Access F Ent .on Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound xe.tb..d Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Sourly Flow Rate, HFR ?63 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles- -- '--'- --- - - -'--- Median Type Undivided .. No RT Channelired? Lane. - -' Configuration T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street:- Approach Northbound Smuthbound Movement ? 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 2 Percent Heavy vehicles Percent Grade (a) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? " Storage AT Channelized? No Lanes R Configuration Delay. Queue Length, and Level of Service Souihbountl ApproaU EB MB Northbound Movement 1 4 1? 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I R C(a) (vph) U.04 95% queue length .12 Con 9 Control Delay 9.] LOS App Approach Imlay 9.7 Approach LOS - A HCS2000: Unaignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Imlich Matthew J. Uelich, P.E. HC52000: Unaignaliced Intersections Release 4.1 F _•�'•' 1 _ MTNO�'WAY_SSOP CONTROL SUMMARY Ane}rip:;. -F: 1DJ 4'c..I - .. Agency/Cd. �: E. tthew J. Delich, P.E. - Oat. Performed:. 7/12/01 Analysis -Time Period: am��3 intersection: - Or /Access e Jurisdiction: Fort Co Analysis Year: short ei)bkgr total - Project ID: D140 East/Weat Street: Draka North/South Street: Access G Intersection Orientation: EN Study perind. (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Easttquol Nestbound Movement : 1 2 3 ...I(. 4 ... 5 6 volume +40 ?40 35 60 5 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF: 0. 95 0. 95 0.95 0.95 0. 95 0.95 Hourly Flow Here, HFR r42 778 .36 63 ?SO 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 41 -- - 2 -- -- Median Type undivided RT Channelized? Lane. f 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration t L TR _ L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: %pane on .,....,Northtound Southbound Movement 8 9 1 10 11 12 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: M Agency/Co.: M J. Oelich, P.E. Cate Performed: ]/_ .. Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: rake/Access G Jurisdiction; Fort Collins Analysis Year: short epbkgrd cote Project ID: 0240 East/Went Street: Drake North/South Street: Access G Intersection Orientation: EW Study period Inc.): 0.25 Vehicle Vol umea end Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 595 10 30 535 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 10 626 10 31 563 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -' 2 -- -- -. Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L SR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Nor[ and SouNbound Movement ? 8 9 30 33 12 L T R L T R Volume 50 10 15 10 10 55 Peak Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 52 10 15 10 30 57 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%1 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach; Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 0 t I 0 1 1 Configuration IT R LT R . Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB NB Northbound Southbound . Movement 1 4 1 T 8 -9 1 SO 11 12 Lane Config L L I IT R I IT A v (vphl 10 31 6 15 20 57 11.) Ivph1 1004 947 118 461 140 524 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.53 0.03 0.14 0.11 95% queue length 0.03 0.10 2.46 0.10 0.48 0.36 Control Delay 8.6 B.9 65.2 12.7 35.0- 12.7 LOS D B Approach Delay A A F 55.0 B 18.5 Approach LOS F C HCS2000: Unaignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael ' Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Dellch, P.E. Date Performed:2/Ol Analyst. Time Par End: Intersection: take/Access N Jurisdiction: Fort C Analysis Year. short bkgr Cola Project I0: 0140 Eaet/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Access H :L T R I L T R Volume ;'25 10 10 5 30 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF ;0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HER i26 10 30 5 10 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles {2 2 2 2 2 2 .. Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ,,,,a. _...... ._. Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes �.._D. •-1.• w: 1 0 1 1 Configuration IT R IT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1? 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Confiq L t1 I IT R IT R v f 42 63 36 10 15 - 31 CI 885 813 57 387 68 432 vl _..._...0,05 ....0. 08 ..v O-63.,, .., 1-0.01. ..A.22 .-_.....,,. 0. 01...... 95, length 0.15 0.25 2.59 0.08 0.76 : 0.23 Cont.- Delay 9.3 SIB 142.8 14.5 72.3 14.0 LOS A A F B F-- 8 Approach Imlay 114.9 33.0 Approach LOS F D Intersection Orientation: IN Study period (bra): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound weacbaund Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 100 405 - 300 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flaw Rate, HFR 105 426- 315 21 .. Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- '- -- Median Type TRITE. RT Channelired? 0 Lanes Configuration 1 1 L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound ou[hDountl Movement 17 9 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Faccor..PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 136 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (1) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage AT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration - LA Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbountl Movement 1 4 1? 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v Ivph) 305 638 c, Ivph) 1223 - 638 v/c 0.09 0.25 951 queue length 0.28 0.96 Control Delay 8.2 12.5 LOS A B Approach Delay 12.5 Approach LOS B HC52000: Unaignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Dalich, P.E. HC52000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. NCS2000: Signali-nterse ctions Release 4.1 4 Intersection Performance Summary / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Appr Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Custer Group Flow Rate Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area T _ ypF All other areas Capacity Isl P Y VIC /C Dela LOS Delay LOS / 9 Y Y Date: 11/17/00 Period: a p Jurisd: Fort Collin on Year : recent short bkgr total bound Project I40 , E/W St: Custer NIS St: Timberline 473 1690 0.08 0.28 26.6 C 26.6 C SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY bound I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 396 1365 0.41 0.29 29.3 C I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 447 1595 0.58 0.28 32.8 C 31.4 C I I_ I , No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 hbound LGConfig I LIP I L TR I L T R I L TR i 234 1770 0.05 0.63 15.6 B Volume 15 20 15 1260 25 360 115 1515 245 1265 1785 10 1982 3539 0.84 0.56 22.8 C 21.8 C Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 886 1583 0.18 0.56 11.2 B RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 hbound 234 1770 0.54 0.63 20.9 C Duration 0.25 Area _ Type: All other areas 1981 3536 0.83 0.56 22.5 C 22.4 C Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 6 Intersection Delay 23.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C EB Left A 1 NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P _ HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SE Left A A P .hew J. Delich Thru A Thru A P .hew J. Delich, P.E. Right A Right A P : Glen Haven Drive Peds X Peds X :land, CO 60538 NB Right. I EB Right SB Right NB Right ,a: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 Green .0 .050.0 al: mdelich8frii.com Yellow 3.0 003.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS All Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 ' - Cycle Length: 100.0 secs .yst: Michael ,cy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 11/17/00 .ysis Time Period: <0pm !rsection: Timberline/Custer Type: All other areas - - - .sdiction: Year: Fort Collins recent short <IoEjpbkgr<total - - .ysis .ect ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street- -✓ Custer Timberline HCS2000: Uns ignelized "Intersections Heleaa<. 9.1 ' Intersection Performance Summary / Lane Adj Sat Patios Lane Group Approach .Group- Flow Rate - Capacity Is) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS f 491 1693 0.09 0.29 25.9 C 25.9 C bound 40B 1359 0.67 0.30 35.0- C 464 1601 0.87 0.29 $0.3 D 44.1 D hbound 305 1770 0.05 0.58 17.4 B 1770 3539 0.90 0.50 30.6 C 28.5 C 792 - 1583 0.33 0.50 16.0 B hbound 322 1710 0.87 0.62 50.8 D 1945 3536 0.97 0.55 36.1 D 38.0 D Intersection Delay = 35.0+ (sec/veh) Intersection LOS D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 hew J. Delich hew J. Delich, P.E. Glen Haven Drive land, CO 80538 e: (970) 669-2061 - Fax: (970) 669-5034 il: mdelich8frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS yst: Michael cy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 11/17/00 ysis Time Period: am® rsection: Timberline/Custer Type: All other areas .diction: Fort Collins - ysis Year: recent short on bkgr total act ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline WO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMART- Malys[. Michael : I Agency/Co.: Matthew J Del' h P.E Date Performed: 12/O1` Analysts Time- Intersectlon•' °rake/Ac aa'F.- !< Jurisdiction' Fort Camel->;e - Analysis Year: sM1ort on kgrd cote ';Ji }5s -..t •• - Project ID. G140 yM .•ey>, .. East/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Access F Intersection Orientation: EW 9tutly !pe riodNlhra l': -0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach FAstbountl _ • Wes[Eound . Movement 1 2 3 -1 4 5- 16 L r H 1 L T A Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, NPR 668 5 Percent Heavy vehicles... -- Median Type Undivided AT Channelized? - No Lanes 1 1 Configuration T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R 0.95 Peak Hour Factor, PHE Hourly Flow Rate, HM - -- - 41 Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%1 Median Storage '-- - - Flared Approach: Exists? Storage AT Channelized? No Lanes Configuration A 0 Delay, Queue Length, end Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 B 9- 1 10 11 12 Lane Config R v (vphl 63 C(a) (eph) 830 0. 0.08 951 queue length 0.25 Control Delay 9.7 LOS A Approach Delay 9.7 Approach LOS A KC52000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. intersection Performance S. ApprP Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 549 3433 0.81 0.16 49.1 D T 814 3539 0.37 0.23 32.7 C 36.7 0 R 697 1583 0.76 0.44 28.6 C We •.d L 212 1770 0.87 0.12 72.8 E T 672 3539 0.47 0.19 36.5 D 41.8 D R 570 1583 0.41 0.36 24.5 C Northbound L 584 3433 0.79 0.17 47.2 D TR 1539 3497 0.95 0.44 39.5 D 41.4 D Southbound L 230 1770 0.76 0.13 55.4 E T 1416 3539 0.75 0.40 29.4 C 28.6 C R 950 15B3 0.32 0.60 10.1 B Intersection Delay - 36.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. .2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO B0538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael - Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: imberline/Drake Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short on bkgrd total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Drake - Timberline Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS . Delay LOS Eastbound L 446 - --- 3433 0.76 0.13 49.2 ._ D T 602 3539 0.70 0.17 42.7 D 53.3 D R 633 1583 0.99, 0.40 62.6--''E- Westbound - A67.0 L 230 1770 0.85 -0-13 E T 602 3539 0.59 0.17 39.9 D 41.0 D R 633 1583 0.38 0.40 21.6 C Northbound L 652 3433 0.87 0.19 51.6 D TR 1497 3482 '0.94 0.43 40.4 D 43.6 0 Southbound L 336 1770 0.85 0.19 56.8 E T 1522 3539 0.89 0.43 34.1 C 32.8 C R 950 1583 0.41 0.60 10.9 B Intersection Delay - 41.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS D KCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, Co 80536 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: . am e Intersection: It eerline/Drake Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: For[.Collins An- 's Year: recent short ng obkgr .tota P: ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Drake Timberline HCS2r Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake � Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: a pm Year : recent short ong bkgrtl ota Pz oject ID. 140 E/W St: Drake NIS St: Timberline 9 'SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION. SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T eR I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 I 1 No. Lanes I 2 2- !.1 I 1 2 1 12 2 0 I 1 2 1 I LGConfig I L T �R: C L T R I L TR I L T R I Volume 1320 '400 595 1.185 340 230 1540 1195 145 1270 1280 370 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0.12.0' 112.0 12.0 12.0 1.12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR 'Wof"r `0..`....:.L....- .: '--0 _.._.. 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Azea Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 B I EB Left A ( I NB Left A Thru € A I Thru P Right A Right P Peds X Peds X WB Left A i I SB Left A Thru •, A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds `.X I Peds X NS Right I EB Right A 1 SB Right A 3 I WB Right A Green - 12.0 ,17.0 18.0 43.0 Yellow 0.0 t3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 12.0 0.0 2:0. Cycle 1jength: 100.0 secs i 4 I i n{' .. 1 t. i j HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Custer Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Juriad: Fort Collins - Period:r,V4��',on pm Year : recent short bkgrtl Catal Project 7D: 0140 E/W St: Custer NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes I 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 1 2 0 I LGConfig I LTR 1 L TR I L T R I L TR I Volume 15 15 15 1155 10 235 110 1585 155 1120 1565 5 1 Lane -width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 )12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 .I 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Cgmbination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NO Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P ' Pad. X Peds X WB Left A SB Left A P Thru A Thru P Right A 1 Right P ' Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 28.0 6.0 56.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY at: Michael y/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 7/12/01 .S. Time Period: am/i eectian: T' line/Access D diction: Fort Co s .is Year: short cng kgr tots or ID: 0140 West Street: Meese D /South Street: Timberline section Orientation: NS Study period (hral: 0.25 Vehicle VoLmes and Adjustments Street: Approach Northbound Southb.end Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Is I Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0�95 D.95 0.95 0.95 .y Flow Rate, HFR 78 1663 63 B9 2005 31 mt Heavy vehicle.. -2 -- 2 -- -- ,n Type Undivided ,annelized? 1 2 0 1 2 a !guration L T TR - L T TR .ram Signal? Na No Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 a 9 '1 30 11 12 L T R I L T A 30 20 rHour Factor,'PHF 0.95 0.95 .y Flow Hate, NPR 31 21 ,nt Heavy Vehicles 2 2 :nt Grade (1). _' .. 0- '_"' -.-.._ 0 n Storage - - ,d Approach: Exist.? ' Storage .. .. .._ .. -.._.. ... .. .... nelired? Had No 1 figuration R R Delay; Queue Length, and Level of Service )ach NB SB Westbound Eastboentl sent 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 30 13 12 Config L L I R ,1 A (vph) 274 362 352 286 0.28 0.25 0.09 0.07 ,..a length 1.14 D.95 0.29 0.24 ral Delay 23.3 16.2 16.2 18.6 C C C C >ach delay 16.2 18.6 7ach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalired Intersections Release 4.1 new J. Delich new J. Delich. P.E. - MC32000: Unsignalired Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY •at: Michael :y/Co.: Matthew J. Selina, P.E. Performed: 7/12/01 ,sis Time Period: am :section: S rline/Acce.a E $diction: Fort Coa ,sis Year: = short bkgr tots :ct 10: 0140 'West Street: M... E - ,/South Street: Timberline .eectian Orientation: NS Study period (hral: .0.25 .. ' vehicle volumes and Mjustmenta Street: Approach Northbound Southbountl Movement 1' 2 - 3 1 4 5. 6 L. P. R I L T R- Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 - 0.95 0.95 y Flow Rate, .HER 1784 - 52-' " " 2000 26 ,nt Heavy Vehicles -- - -- -- m Type Undivided ion nelized? 2 a 2 0 .guration T TR .- _ T TR mam Signal? No --- No Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 a 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Hour Factor;PHF' 0.95 a'.95 .y Flow Rate, NTH 21 21 mt Heavy Vehicles 2 " - " - 2 ' )nt Grade (1) -- 0- -'-' 0' " m Storage- x1 Approach: Exist.? .... - .. .. Storage ,annel>zed7 _ No .guration R .. R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ach NB SB Weatbou)W Eastboudd ment 1 4 1 7 a 9 1 10 11 12 Config' I R I 'R )h) - 21 - 22 (,ph) 327 ' ' ' - 280 0.06 0.01 None length' '0.20 - 0.23 :ol Delay 16.0 - 18.5 C C mach Delay 16.9 .. 18.5 )ach LOS C C HC52000: Unsignalixetl intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP C SUMMARY Analyst: MS chael Agency/Ca.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Data Performed: 371,12101 Malys is Time Period: am pm Intersection: mberllne/Access E Jurisdiction: Fort Coina Analysis Year:. short onbkgrtl(otal Project ID: 0140 East/West Street: Mrs.. E North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study Period .Jhrs): 0.25 Vehicle Voludes and Mjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southboend Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1900 15 1425 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Pate, HER 2000 15 1500 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channeli.ad? Lanes 2 0 2 0 Configuration T IN T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 30 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PNF 0.95 _ 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HM 42 36 Percent Heavy Vehicle. 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? .. Storage RT Channalit.d? No - 'No Lane. I Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I R v (eph) - 42 36 C(.) (vph) 290 - - 408 v/c 0.14 0.09 951 queue length 0.50 - - 0.29 Control Delay - I9:5 14.7 Los --C - B Approach Delay 19.5 14.7 Approach LOS C " " - B' - - RCS2000: Unsignalired Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. L i HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael - y Inte r..:;.Timber line/Drake _ Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. "'"' "-Area'Typ'ec=AI1-"dther areas Date: 1R17/00 Jurisd: Foit Collins Period: (ag/pm Year. recenCshort �b kgrd oral Project TD'.0140 - E/W St: Drake NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIOWSUNKARY .d f a Eastbound I Me bound '"�l `�`Noi[fitiountl I soot hbound I - I L T- R I L 'T -R -I'L `.T' R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 -1 _ 4 2 '2 0 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I . L T 'R I L TR I L T R I' Volume 1420 290 505 1175 300 220 1440 1275 110 1165 1010 265 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 0 1 0 1 0 1- 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A A I Thru A P Right A A I Right A P , Peds x I Peds x WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I -Thru P . Right A I Right P Peds x I _Peds x NB Right I EB Right A A SB Right A A I WB Right A Green 11.0 4.0 19.0 12.0 4.0 40.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Onaignalized Intersection. R.leaae 4.1 Delich ,a. J. Delich, P.E. sr f Intersection Performance Sum APpr/. Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane .p Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) : v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 359 1770 0.22 0.19 26.8 C TR 350 1592 0.09 0.22 31.2 C 28.1 C W Id L 365 1770 0.55 0.29 11.2 C TR 349 1588 0.16 0:22� 32.U' C 31.4 C Northbound L 261 1770 0.3E 0.6' 13.4 B TR 1975 '3526 10.99 0.56 .39.4. D 38.1 D Southbound L 234 1770 0.29 0.63 20.E C TR 1969 3516 0.67 0.56 17.3 B 17.5 B Intersection Delay 29.8'' I5ec/veh) Intersection LOS C KCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J- Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive - - - Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Far.: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdeliensfrii.eem OPERATIONA:, ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. DatePerformed: 7/12/01 - Analysis Time Period: m pm - - Intersection: ll imberline/Pccess C Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fart Collins Analysis Year: shot .Ong kgr total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Srreet Access.0 Timberline Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach .Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity _ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS .Delay LOS _ Eastbound-. - - L 332 - 1770._ 0.25 0.27 28-5 C TR 317 1586 - 0.30 0.20 34.6 C 31.8 C Westbound -"' L 327 1770 0.45 0.27 30.2 C TR -318 1588 0.20 0.20 33.7 C 31.2 C Northbound L 304- 1770 0.12' 0.62 '- 17.3 B TR ' 1892 3504 0.80 0.54 26.2 C 26.0 C Southbound L 304 1770 0.71 0.65 33.8 _ C TR 2050 3535 _ 0.93 .0.58,-'_ 27.0 C 27.7 C 'Intersection Delay = 27.4' (sec/veh) Intersection LOS"-- C HC52000: Signalized -Intersections Release 9.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich8frii.com OPPRATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/12 O1 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Timberline/Access C Area Type: - All other areas Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: - Fort Co ins short Qon bkgrtl tonal , Pr, ' ' ID: -0140 East/West Street North/South Street Access C Timberline. HCS20' Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Access C Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. - Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/l?,4Ql -Jurisd: Fort CSIgns Period: a p tote Year : short Ong bkgrtl Project Access C 140 E/W St: Access N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED I,NTERSECTION SUMMARY I :Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I- L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 No. Lanes I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 I LGConfig 1 L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 i Volume 180 1 90 1140 1- 60 135 1470 105 1205 1790 15 - Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0. 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 1- 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A -A I NB Left A P Thru - A I Thru P Right - A I Right P Peds X i Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left:. A A P Thru A Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 20.0 6.0 4.0 54.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0' secs MCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.l TWO -MAT STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Hatthew J. Delich, P.E. Dace Performed: 7 2/01 Analysis Time Period: Intersection: almberl ine/Access D Jurisdiction: Fort COOn'n3 Analysis Year: abort kg:d tote Project ID: 0140 East/West Street: Acreaa D North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 vehicle Vol umee and Adjuatmenta Major Street: Approach Northbound Soutsbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R volume 20 900 0 2 1J9 30 _ Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 2000 21 21 1463 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Unaividea La a. 1 2 0 '1 2 0 Configuration L T TR 6. Ntl" TR .. .._ .. _ .. ... _ .. .. Upat ream No Signal? - Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume 50 4D Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate. HFR 52 42 Percent Heavy Vehicle. 2 2 Percent Grade (4) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Etiets? Storage RT Channelized? -... No ... .._ _.. No -._ ... ...._ .. .. Lanes 1 .... 1" Configuration R R _. Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach _ NB SB Westbound Eastbound _ Movement 1 4 1 1 B 9 1 10 11 12 Lane config L L I R I R v (eph) 21 21 52 42 Clm) (VPh) 454 27B 289 417 v/c 0.05 0.06 a.18 0.10 951 queue length 0.15 0.24 0.64 0.33 Control Delay 13.3 19.0 20.2 14.6 Los a C C B Approach Delay 20.2 14.6 Approach LOS C B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. belies Matthew J. Delich, P.E. KC52000: Unsigna lize1 Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY yet: Michael cy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 7/12/01 ,.is Time Period: reaction: T' rline/Access A edict ion: Fort Couins Yale Year: ahort(E- bkgr total act ID: 0140 /Heat Street: Access A n/South Street: Timberline reaction Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25._ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments r Street: Approach Notthhound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6' L T R I L T R No, 1565 45 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 - - ly Flow Rate, HFR 1647 47 ,_ ant Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- an Type Undivided nannelized? 2 0 iguration T TR r¢aT Signal? NO NO r Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 B 9 1 10 11 12 L T- R I L T R Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 ly Flow Rate, HER 21 ant Heavy Vehicles 2 - ant Grade (e) 0 0 n Storage ad Approach: Exists? Storage onnelized? No s1 figuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service nach We SB Westbound Eastbound sent 1 4 1 7 B 9 1 SO 11 12 Config I A I .h) 21 (vph) 362 0.06 queue length 0.10 of Delay 15.6 C nach belay 15,6 nach LOS C KCS2000: Onsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 w J. Delich new J. Delich, P.E. HC52000: Onsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUNBURNT ,at: 1- - Michael" :y/Co.: Matthew J. Deliub, P.E. Performed: 7/12/01 Time Period: , ad 0 sec t ion: Timberline/Acceaa 6 :diction: Fort Co line 1 's year: ahurt bkgrd total Qfp :.is ID: 0140 'Nest Street: Access B , ,/Sauch Street-. Timberline ' .section Orientation: NS'- "-- -Study period (hfa): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R :I L T R ae 1565 45 -Hnur Factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 _ '.y Flow Rate, HER 1647 47 ant Heavy Vehicles - -- -- -- n Type Undivided ....- ,..- 'a,nelized? 2 0 ,guration T TR - :eam Signal? No No Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 S 9 el 10 11 12 L T R L T R hour Factor, PHF 0.95 . Flow Rate, HFR 47 , t Heavy Vehicles 2 :nt Grade lei 0 0 is Storage to Approach: Exists? _ stoz'age ,a,u,elized? No , lqura[ion R ' Delay, Queue Length, and level of Service MCh NB SB Westbound Eastbound lent 1 4 1 7 a 9 1 10 11 12 Config R I ,h) 47 lvphl 362 `0.13 pane length 0.44 :ol Delay .16.4 C ,ach Delay 16.4 >ach LOS C NC52000: Unsigneliavd lot .mention. Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP f SUMMKRY 1 R Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7412/01 Annlyais Time Period pm Intersection: Timbetline/Acceaa B Jurisdiction: Fort C ins Analysis Year: an. Ion bkgr Iota Project ID: 0140 , East/Nest street: Acceaa B North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: ME Study period (hr.): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume - 1955 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 _ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2D51 15 _ Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- I --- Median Type Undivided AT Channelized? - - Lanes 2 0 - Configuration T ':: TR, .. Upstream Signal? No. No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 B 9 1 10 11 12 L- 'IT, R I L T R _ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Mrs. HFR 73 i Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade It) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channel iiad? No ` Lanes Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service.. Approach NS SB Weatbountl Eastbound - Movement 1 4 1 7 9 9 1 10 11 12 1 Lane Config I R v (vph). ,..73 .. C(m1 (vph) 281 "- a/c 0.26 951 queue -length- 1.01 Control Delay 22.2 LOS C Approach Delay 22.2 Approach LDS C - - - HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Access C Agency: Matths,J.: Delich, P.E. Area Type.:.All•-other'arnas Date: 7/12 O1' - Jurisd: Fort _Collins Period:- m Year : short on bkgrd tat al Project E/W St: Access. C" N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I I Eastbound Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R i L ' T R L T R _1_ 1 No. Lanes 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 12 0 I 1 2 0 I ' LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TP. I L. TR I Volume 175 1 30 1190 1 60 195 1810 45 165 1200 55 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 H ! EB Left A A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds % I Peds y. ME Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A Thru P Right A Right P Peds .. Peds .. NB. Right I EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 6.0 22.0 - 6.0 56.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs MCS2000: Onsignalired Intersections Release 4.1 w J. Delich :',• .ew J. Delich, P.E. I a Intersection Performance Some Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane p Approach Lane Group Flow Rate -. Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 195 1710 0.68 0.11 51.8 D T 1416 3539 0.97 0.40 43.6 D 31.7 D R 934 1583 0.40 0.59 11.3 B W d L 240 3433 0.46 0.07 46.1 D TR 1261 3504 0.74 0.36 31.9 C 33.4 C Northbound L 515 3433 0.95 0.15 69.6 E T 1345 3539 0.66 0.38 24.6 C 35.6 D R 776 1583 0.71 0.49 23.1 C Southbound L 124 1770 0.43 0.07 46.9 D T 1062 3539 0.85 0.30 39.3 D 36.5 D R 712 1583 .0.21 0.45 16.9 B Intersection Delay = 36.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich8frii.com Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: m pm Intersection:Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins - Analysis Year: recent short ong bkgr coca Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South-Street Prospect v Timberline Intersection Performance Summary appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate rip Capacity _ (s) v/c g/C DelayLOS---Delay LOS Eastbound L 177 1770 0.77 0.10 62.9 T' E f 1274. 3539 _.0.84 0.36 _ 34.4 C 33.1 C ,y 871 1583 0.83 0.55' '25.7 :C Westbound L 549 3433 0.89 0.16 57:7 E PR 1469 3498 1.02 0.42 57.0 E 57.2 E 9orthbound L 515 3433 0.97 0.15 74.5 E T 1132 3539 0.84 0.32 36.2 D 43.8 D R 623 1583 0.33 0.52 14.2 B Southbound L 142 1770 0.41 0.08 45.7 D T 885 3539 -1.00 0.25 61.4. E 57.7 E R 617 1503 0.36 0.39 22.0 C Intersection Delay = 47.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelichefrii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS_ Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins An- is Year: recent short ong bkgrd Cora P ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline HCS20' Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Agency: Matthew J, Deiich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas ... Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year : recent short long bkgrd cote Project I0: 0140 E/W St: Prospect N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 1_----1- No. Lanes I 1 2 1 I 2 2 0 I 2 2 1 I 1 2 1 I ' LGConfig I L T R 1 L TR I L T R I L T R I I Volume 1130 1020 690 1465 1310 110 1475 900 260 155 840 210 1 Lane width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _Signal Operations se PhaCombination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A A Thru.. P I Thru A A Right P I Right A A Pads X I Peds % W8 Left A A I SB Left A - Thru A P I -Thru A Right A P I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right A A I EB Right A A SB Right A I WB Right Green 9.0 6.0 36.0 7.0 7.0 25.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Onsiguslized n,teroecti0na Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/CC.: Matthew J. DeliCh, P.E. Date Performed: 3t12/01 Analysis Time Period•(43)[m Inter -----On: mberline/Access A Jurisdiction: Fort Co Analysis Year: ahmri lot skgrtl oral Project Io: 0140 Eaet/West Street: Access A North/South Street: Timberline , Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hra): 0.25 . vehicle v.Lmo and Adjust ... ts 1 Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound - Mavement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T A I L T A volume „ -- 2010 Peak -Hour Factor, PRF 0.95 0.95 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2115 15' Percent Heavy vehicles -- -- -- -' Median Type Undivided AT ChaMelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Up.treem Si9na1? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 S 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L f A 1 volume 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grad. (4) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Emisca? Storage AT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration A Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Apprcach NS SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 0 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config A I v (vph) 31 C(m) (vph) 270 v/c 0.11 95% queue length 0.36 control Delay 20.1 Ins C Approach Delay 20.1 Approach LOS C HCS20o0: Unsignalited Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich„ P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersection. Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY .yet: Michael - cy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich. P.E. - Performed: 7 12/01 , .s.cTime Period action: keke/Access H ..diction: Fo Collins ' .ya is Year: nort ong hkgt atal act ID: 0140 - /What Street: Drake h/South Street: Accaaa H -' reaction Orientation: VW Study period (hra): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adju.teent. z Street: Approach Eaathound Westbound .. Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R :-Haar Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95� 0.95 - ly Flow Rate, HFR 105 210 200 21 ant Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- --- an Type TWLTL 'hannalirad? ! 1 0 'iguration L T TR - - team Signal? No No ,r Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 9 9 1 10 11 12 i L T R I L T R . Hour Factor, PHF D.95 0.95 ly Flow Rate, HFR 21 136 .or Heavy Vehicle. 2 2 out Grade (4) 0 0 an Storage 1 ad Approach: Exists? No Storage hanneliretl? a 0 0 iguration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service oach EB MB Northbound Southbound went 1 4 1 7 B 9 1 10 11 12 Config L i I LR PHI 105 157 (vph) 1340 162 0.08 0.21 queue length 0.25 0.77 col Delay 7.9 10.9 A B each Delay 10.9 .su n LOS B RCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 hew J. Delich hew J. Delich, P.E. _ APPENDIX G HU2000: Unsignalized Interaectiona Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP l SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich. P.E. -' Ante Performed: 1 am Analyeia Time Period: am .. Interdiction: Oreke/Accaaa N JurAnalysis Year: llins Project year: door lonq bkgr co[ Project ID: alto East/Meat Street: Drake Morin/$Dorn Street; Access X Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (his): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustmenta - - Major Street: Approach Ea.tboand Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 1 T R 1 L T R Volume 125 170 325 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95'' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 131 178 342 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Ch,unralized? Lanes I 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 .11 12 L T R I L T- R .. Volume 20 130 _ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 , Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ...- 21 136 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (1) 0 0 - - Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exiats7 - No Storage - RT Channelized? Lanes -- 0 0 Configuration LR Delay. Queue Length, and Level 'of Servite Approach E8 WB Northbound. Southbound s Mmvemant 1 4 1 7 B 9 1 10 11 . 12 Lane Config L I .LR V (vph) 131 - 157 C(m) (vph) 1196 641 v/c 0.11 0.24 _ 95% queue length 0.37 Control Delay 6.4 - 12.4 Los A B Approach Delay 4T.1 Approach LOS B BCS2000: Unaignalired Intersection. Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. BCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael.. Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Agency: Matthew.J. Delich, P.E. Area Type:_All other.,aieas Date: 11/17/00 - Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: m pm. - Year i recehi `ongshobt bkgr total Project 0140 E/W St: Prospect - NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Weatbound I Northbound- I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 _ _ 1 No. Lanes 1 '1 2 1 2 2 0 I '2 2 1 I 1 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R L TR I L T A I L T R I Volume 1125 1305 355 1105 830 60 1465 840 525 150 860 145 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A P I Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds x I Peds x WB Left A - I SE Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds x I Peds x NB Right A I EB Right A A SB Right A A I WB Right Green 6.0 4.0 36.0 6.0 0.0 30.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs TWO -NAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Maly§pt Michael Mara% J. Delich, P.E. ' late Performed: 2/01 Maly Time Period: pm I n[e [sect ion: take/Accesa F Jurisdiction: FO���CO Mina 3nalyais Year: ,5hortllmng bkgrd total Project ID: 014D �� East/West Street: Drake 4orth/South Street: Acceaa F Ir ion Orientation: EW Study period (hr.); 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustment9 4ejor street Approach Eastboond Westbound Movement 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 L T R_I L T R Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 4ourly Flow Rate, HFR 568 5 2ercent Heavy Vehicles -- -- - -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Cho... lined? No Lanes ..-4 I :onfiguration T R Jpatrem Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movenen[ ? B 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR u 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (1) 0 B Median Storage - Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Cones Configuration A delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB NB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 1 B 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I I A C(m) (vph) a/c 0.0? 951 queue length 0.24 Control Delay 9.5 LOS A 'Approach Delay 9-5 Approach LOS A Hcs2o00: unsignalized Intersection; Release 4-1 Matthew J: Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS'2UGU- Unsignalited Intcrsections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/D1 - Analysis Time,Period: Pe Intersect -On:-" ke/Access G Jurisdiction:' FO Ca Ulna Analysis Year: shor long bkgr tot Project ID: 0140 East/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Access G Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (bra): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Approach Eaas... no Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume to os 490 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flo. Rate, HFR 30 321 515 5 Percent Heavy vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT ChaMelired? Lanes 1 1 1 d Configuzation L T TR Upatrem Signal? No We Minor Street: Approach Northbound SouthbaunJ Movement ? 8 9 1 30 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0-95 0.95 Hourly Flaw Rate, RM 10 57 Percent Heavy vehicles 2 - 2 Percent Grade (5) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Cone. 1 1 Configuration L A Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB t!B Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1? B 9 1 10 11 12 Cone Config L I I L R C ) 1046 442 558 0.02 0.02 0.10 9: a length 0.03 0.07 0.34 Corm...; Delay B.5 13.3 12-2 LOS A B B Approach Delay 12.4 Approach LOS B HCS2o00: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 +AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: 1 Agency/Co.: Ma--.,e. J. Delieh, P.E. Data Performed: 1112101 Analyais Time Period: Inte..ec[ion: Dr m/Access F Jurisdiction: Fo Collins Malysia Yee.: ox long bkgr total Project to: 0140 Fast/West Street: Drake North/South Street: Access F Intersection orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volume. and Adjustments -_- Mayor Street: Approach Eastbuund Weatbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ! L T R I_ L T R p Vol.. _ _t 595 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF.; 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, !' 615 615 VHFRehicles Heavy Vehi clew -- -- -- -- �r Median undivided Median RT Channelsneli road ns - No Lanes Configuration( - T R y Upstream 'SSghel? ..•. .No F=''.-- No j Minor Street: Approach - Northbound "Soutlimouhd "Movement- -"] B v.. 9 I 10", lie -'-v"T 12 T =. R I L R Volume. - l ,T _ 30 Peak Hour Factor; PHF Ie 0.95 Hourly flow Rate,. HFR 31 Percent Heavy "Vehicles - aF. 2 Percent Grade (1) �U 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage j AT Chuanelized?'. No Lanes 1 Configuration` R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB NB NOtt1%bound Southbound Movement 1.,' 4 1? 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config W I R v (vpn) C(ml (vph) 849 o/c 0.04 95% queue length 0.11 Control Delay 9.4 LOS A Approach Delay 9.4. Approach LOS A HCS2000: unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. a, HCS2000: Uusignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO -NAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyse Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P-E- Date Performed: 7/12/01 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Drake/Access G Jurisdiction: F Collins Analy.i. Year: ;hart long Dkgrd Project ID: 0140 Eaat/Neat Street: Drake North/South Street: Accede G Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hr.): 0.25 vehicle Volumes and Adjustment. - Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 40 450 560 s Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 '0.951 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 42 473 509 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- - -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? - Lane. Configuration L T TR .- Upatrem Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound - Southnound Movment ? .8 9 I 10 Al . 12 - L T R I L ., T. R_ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95.., 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles ...? 2 Percent Grade (4) 0 _ 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes "1 1 Configuration L R - Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach E9 ;R Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 a 8 9 1 10 11 ' 12 - Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 42 - 5 31 C(m) (vph) 982 347 506 v/c 0-04 0.01 0.06 951 queue length 0.13 0.04 0.20 Control Delay 8.8 15.5 12.6 LOS A C B Approach Delay 13.0 Approach LOS B HCS2U00: Uvignalized Intersection. Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 .yet: Michael Inter.: Timberline/C. icy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 11/17/00 Juri3d; Fort Ca11i s .od: ®m pm Year : recent total short bkgr ,act ID: M140 St: Custer NIS St: Timbezline _ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I _ 1 Lanes I 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 0 1 tnfig_ I LTR I L TR I L T R I L TR I me 15 1 15 1160 1 110 110 1335 60 140 1375 5 1 Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1. 0 3tion 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations :e Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 B Left A I NB Left A P Thru A Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X I Peds X - Left A I SB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X Right I EB Right Right I WB Right in 28.0 6.0 56.0 - Low - 3.0 0.0 3.0 Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 sets HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 yst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Custer cy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 11/17/00 - Jurisd: Fort Collins ,oil: am(9) Year . recent short bkgr total ect ID: 0140 St: Custer NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Lanes I 0 I 0 1 1 i 0 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 0 I ,nfig I LTR I L TR I L T R I L TR 1 me 15 1 15 1105 1 85 115 1275 170 1115 1470 10 1 r width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 t Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1- 0 1 on 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations _ ie Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A Right -P Peds X I Peds. X Left A I SE Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X Right I EB Right Right NB Right in 28.0 6.0 56.0 Low 3.0 0.0 3.0 Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 1 Intersecti rformance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat .ros Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS �. Eastbound LTR 451 1610 0.05 0.28 26.3 C 26.3 C Westbound L 401 1384 0.42 0.29 29.4 C TR 444 1566 0.26 0.28 28.3 C 29.0 C Northbound , L 234 1770 0.05 0.63 12.4 B T 1982 3539 0.71 0.56 18.2 B 17.8 B R 886 1593 0.07 0.56 10.2 B Southbound L 242 1770 0.17 0.63 12.7 B - TR 1981 3537 0.73 0.56 1B.9 B 18.7 B Intersection Delay 19.3 (sec/vehl Intersection LOS B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80530 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelichBfrii.com Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: m pm Intersection: imberline/Custer Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent shor -bkgr total Project ID: 0140 ' - East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group: Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp - Capacity- -fs)- v/c --TIC - Delay 1705;,_' Delay LOS Eastbound _ LTR 452 1615 0.05 0.28 26.3' .. C 26.3 C westbound - L 401 1384 0.28 0.29 27.e C TR 444 1586 0.20 0.28 27.7 C 27.7 C Northbound L 234 1770 0.07 0.63 14.1 S T 1982 3539 0.68 0.56 17.5 B .16.7 B R 886 1583 .0.20 0.56 11.4 B Southbound L 256 1770 0.47 0.63 14.6 B TR 1980 3535 0.79 0.56 20.6 C 20.1 C Intersection Delay w 19.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - S HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich8frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am® Intersection: Timberline/Custer Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Coll ns Analysis Year: recen short bkgr total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South_Street Custer Timberline HCS2000: Signalized Intersections P',se 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: 1 :line/Drake Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: ell other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Coll '. Peziod: am pm Year : recen ehor long bkgr total Project 0140 E/W St: Drake NIS St: Timberline _ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1_ 1 No. Lanes I 2 2 0 I 1 2 0 I 2 2 0 I 1 2 0 I LGConfig 1 L TR 1 L TR 1 L TR 1 L TR 1 Volume 1370 150 435 1130 290 180 1320 1060 70 195 855 250 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1_ 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A A I Thru A P Right A A I Right A P Pads X I Peds x WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds x NB Right EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 9.0 6.0 20.0 9.0 4.0 42.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs lot, HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area.Type:.All other areas Oate: 11/17/00, Jurisd:-.Forp•;Collins .. Period: am pm ., -Year :+. recent eshort long bkgr total Project ID. 40 E/W St: Drake - NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED'INTERSECTION:SUMMARY I Eastbound. I -Westbound. 1.7Northbound I Southbound I L T R -I L T. R., L-L, T R' .I L T R I--] 1 No. Lanes 1' 2 2 0 1 1 2- 0 1 2 .2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I L TR I.L TR I L. TR I L TR I Volume 1290 245 350 1105 295 190 1355 920 90 1155 1140 310 1 Lane width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ES Left A A I NB Left A Thru A A I Thru P Right A A I Right P Peds X I Peds x WB Left A I SS Left A Thru A I Thru P Right _ A I flight P Peds x I Peds x NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 7.0 4.0 19.0 12.0 48.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs rsection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane at Ratios Lane Group Approach 1 Lane Group F1.... Rate Grp Capacity Is) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 549 3433 0.71 0.16 44.0 D TR B18 3145 0.75 0.26 38.0 D 40.3 D Westbound L 177 1770 0.77 0.10 62.9 E TR 667 3336 0.74 0.20 42.0 D 46.5 D Northbound L 481 3433 0.70 0.14 45.5 D TR 1613 3506 0.74 0.46 23.9 C 28.7 C Southbound L 177 1770 0.56 0.10 47.1 D TR 1436 3419 0.81 0.42 30.5 C 31.8 C Intersection Delay - 34.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS e C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO B0530 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: I}/17/00 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: Timberline/Drake Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent or long bkgr total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Drake Timberline w Intersection Performance Summary Appr/' Lane- Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 412 3433 0.74 0.12 49.5 D TR 742 3227 0.84 0.23 45.6 D 46.9 D Westbound L 142 1770 0.78 0.06 69.2 E TR 633 3331 0.81 0.19 46.4 0 50.5 D Northbound L 446 3433 0.84 0.13 55.7 E TR 1676 3492 0.63 0.48 21.3 C 30.2 C Southbound L 230 1770 0.71 0.13' 51.4 D TR 1644 3426 0.93 0.48. 35.0a D 36.6 D Intersection Delay - 36.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ` 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 '''Fax-i'' (970)' 669-5034• E-Mail: mdelich@frii.co. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0140 Drake Michael _ Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11 am 4VO Timberline/Drake All other areas Fort Col recent shor long bkgrd total East/West Street . North/South Street Timberline HCS2000: Unaignaiirea Incer.iccidns Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUINVURT HCS20DO: Unaignalized intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP C L SUMMARY - An H at: Nuttiest y/C..: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 7/12/01 '. Time Pezimd: section: Lmberline/Access D diction: FO Collins sus Year ong bkgr stet of ID: 0140 West Street: Access D /South Street: Timberline .section Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 - Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R ,e 20 1595 20 20 11TO 10 Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 .y Flow Rate, SIR 21 1670 21 21 1189 10 mt Heavy Vehicles 2 -- - . 2 -- in Type Undivided annelizmd? r1 2 e 1 2 a Lguration L T TR L T TR ream Signal? No He r Street: Approach Wemttennl Eastbound Movement ] 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ae -- Hour Factor, PET 0. 95 0.95 ly Flow Pate, 52 42 ant Heavy Vehicles 2 2 ant Grade (U 0 0 an Storage tl Approach: Exists? Storage henneli zetlt - No No 3 1 iguration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service darn NB Se Neatborid Eastbound ment 1 4 17 8 9 1 10 11 12 Config L L I R I A -Ivph1 578 371 358 499 0.04 0.06 0.15 0.08 queue length 0.11 0.19 0.50 0.27 .rol Delay 11.5 15.3 16.8 12.9 B C C B oach Delay 16.8 12.9 :.on LOS C B HCS2000: Unaignalized Intersections Release 4.1 :hew J. Delich :hew J. De lick, P.E. HCS2000: Unaignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO -NAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Lyst: Michael ,cy/CO.: Matthew J. Delich. P.E. - 4 Performed: 7/12/01 lysis Time Period: e action: r11ne/Access E Lecithin- F t Collins ly.is year; ano long bkgrtl o[al jeer ID: 0140 " ;/West Street: Access E 1,/South Street: Timneilina _section Orientation: NS Study period (hr.): 0.25 Vehicle Volume: and Adjustments u Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R (-Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 rly Flow Ra[e,. HFR 1670 15 1226 5 ant Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Lan Type - Undivided ;hannelizsd? 2 0 2 0 figuration T TR T TR :team Signal? No No ,r Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement ] 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Nee 4U J] i Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 rly Flow Race, HFR - 42 36 dent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 rent Grade (1) 0 0 Len Storage red Approach: Exists? Storage :hannelized? No No as 1 1 figuration R A Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ach NB SB Westbound Eastbound went 1 4 17 8 9 1 10 11 12 4 Config R I A rphl 42 36 (vph) 360 489 0.12 0.07 queue length 0.39 D.24 :rol Delay 16.3 12.9 C B :oach Delay 16.3 12.9 -..on LDS C B alyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/12 O1 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Timberline/Access D Jurisdiction: F Collins Malysis Taar:ort long bkgr total Project Z0: 0140 East/Nest Street: Access D North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orisnt.ti.r: NS Study period (Ara): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T A L T R Volume 15 1235 60 as 1585 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 - Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 78 1300 63 89 1668 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- '- Median Type Undivided AT Channelired? Lane. 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement ] 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Pate. HFR 31 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles. 2 2 Percent Grade (F) 0 _ D Median Storage Flared Approach; Exists? Storage RT Iw Channelizetl? No - No Lanes Configuration N A Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB $6 Westbound Eastbound mememot 1 4 1 ] 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config - L L A A v (vph) 78 89 31 21 C(m) (,,ph) 371 500 440 v/c 0.21 0.18 0.07 0.06 95% queue length 0.78 0.64 0.22 0.19 Control Delay 17.3 13.8 13.6 15.7 LOS C B B C Approach Delay 13.6 15.7 Approach LOS, B C HC$2000: Unaignalized intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. g.2 HCS2000: Unaignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO -MAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY _ Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 1- 7/11 1 Analysis Time Period: nd is Intersection: _ Ti line/Access E Jurisdiction: F Colline Analysis Year: hot long bkgr total - Project ID: 0140 - - East/West Street: Access E North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (brsj: 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1350 50 158 25 Peak -Hour Facto[, PHF. 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 - Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1421 52 1668 26 'Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- " . Median Type Undivided AT Cbamelized? Ianea 2 0 2 0 Configuration T TR T TR Upstream Signal? - No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement ] 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 20 20 Peak Hour Factor, PER 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (1) a 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exiata? Storage AT Channelized? No No Loose I I Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1? 0 9 SO 11 12 Lane Config A I A v Ivph) 21 21 C(ml (vph) 417 360 v/c 0.05 0.06 95% queue length 0.16 0.19 Control Delay 14.1 15.6 IDS B . C Approach Delay 14.1 15.6 Approach IDS e C HCS2000: Unaignalized Intersections Release 4.1 :he. J. Delis :he. J. De Lich, P.E. HC32DOO: Unaignalized lot ... m.tiens Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delis Matthew J. Delich, P.E. I HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Re' se 4.1 .nalyst Michael Inter.: Tip. .rne/Access C agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas )ate: 7/12/01 Juriad: Fort Collins 'eriod: ®pm Year hort long bkgr total 'roject ID: 0140 NIS St: Timberline ;/W St: Access C SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 I -.GCon£ig I L TR I L TR 1 L TR L TR 1 �Iolume 175 1 30 1190 1 85 195 1505 45 165 940 55 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 O 112.0 12.0 0 112.0 12.0 0 1 ^TOR Vol 1 0 1 Juration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2_3 4 1 5 6 7 8 3B Left A A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X Petls X WB Left A A I SS Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right 58 Right I WB Right Green 6.0 24.0 6.0 54.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Access C Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type:-All*other areas Date: 7/12/01 - Jurisd--Fdr C•.Collins' Period: am A otal Year hor 3o64bkgrd Project I: E/W St: Acccessess C C N/S St:,Timberli ne SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION•SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I- Northbound ISouthbound I I L T R I L T R 'J L' T R I L T R I 1 _1 No. Lanes I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 LGConfig I L TR 1 L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 160 1 90 1140 1 60 135 1125 105 1205 1475 15 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ES Left A A I NB Left A P Thru A Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peas X I Petls X WB Left A A SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Petls X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 22.0 6.0 4.0 52.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 _ 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Fax: (9701 669-5034 rsection Performance Summary Appr/ -Lane . at Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate - Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 380 1770 0.21 0.31 25.3 C TR 382 1592 0.09 0.24 29.6 C 26.6 C Westbound L 392 1770 0.51 0.31 20.1 C TR 381 1586 0.24 0.24 30.9 C 29.0 C Northbound L 321 177G 0.31 0.61 11.2 B TR 1903 3524 0.06 0.54 24.9 C 24.1 C Southbound L 233 1770 0.29 0.61 18.3 B TR 1895 3510 0.55 0.54 16.2 B 16.4 B Intersection Delay = 22.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (9701 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSI` Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/12/01 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: imbe zline/Access C Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: F t Collins hort long bkgr total Proiect ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Access C Timberline 'Ib Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp . Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 359 1770 0.23 0.29 26.9 C TR 349 1506 0.28 0.22 32.8 C 30.1 C Westbound L 353 1770 0.42 0.29 26-4 C TR 349 1588 0.18 0.22 32.0 C 29.5 C Northbound L 305 1770 0:12 0.60 12.8 B TR 1817 3494 0.71 0.52 20.7 C 20.5 C Southbound L 313 1770 0.69 0.63 27.7 C TR 1979 3534 0.79 0.56 19.7 B 20.7 C Intersection Delay - 21.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. - 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Hail: mdelich@frii.com Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/12/01 Analysis Time Period: am 0 Intersection: Timberline/Access C Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Fort Collins shbr long bkgr total Proiect ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Access C Timberline KCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY .yet: Michael icy/Co. : Matthe., J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 7/12/01 .Yale Time Period:/�AI section: imbetline/Access A a di ciion: F Collins -ysls Yeaz: snort long bkgrd total act ID: 0140 /Neat Street: Access A h/South Street: Timberline isec[ion Orientation: NS Study period (firs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes am Adjustments ,r Street: Approach northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R :-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 'ly Flow Rate, HFR 1794 15 �.ant Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- an Type Undivided :h...I,.ed? 2 0 figuration T TR .ream Signal? No NO •r Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement ? 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 -ly Flow Rate. HER 31 sent Heavy Vehicles 2 ent Grade (tl 0 0 an Storage 'ad Approach: Exieta? Storage Aannali zed? No 1 iquration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service oach nB SB Westbound Eastbound ment 1 4 1 ? 8 9 1 30 11 12 Config I R I 0.09 queue length 0.30 rot Delay 16.8 C each Delay 16.0 oath LOS C HCS2o00: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 hew J. Erlich hew J. Delich, P.E. HCS20UO: Unaigralizetl intersections Release 4.1 TWO -MAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY yet: Michael cy/Co:: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 7/12/01 Y.is Time Period:�pm auction: Timberline/Access D adiction: Fo Collins ysie Year: or long bkgrtl oral act ID: 0140 /West Street Access B h/South Street: Timberline section Orientation: NS Study Period (brs): 0.25 Vehicle volumes and Adjustments r Street: Approach Nort bourst Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R i L T R -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 ly Flow Rate, HFR 1736 15 ant Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- an Type Undivided hannelired? 9 2 0 iation T TR reamSignal? No No r Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement ? 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 ly Flow Rate, HFR 73 Not Heavy Vehicles 2 ant Grade (t) 0 0 n Storage ad Approach: Exists? Storage hannelized? No igufation R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service each NB SB Westbound Eastbound .ant 1 4 1 1 8 9 1 10 11 12 Config I R I (vph) 349 0.21 queue length 0.78 rol Delay 18.1 C oach Delay le.1 oach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP 1L SUMMARY a Analyst: MichaelAg.n! Date PeCo.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/13 1 Analysts Time Period f Intersection: Timberline/Access A Jurisdiction. 0140 F Collins Analysts long bkgrd o[al Project ID: host East/Wes[ Street: Access A North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hr.): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T A Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, MFR 1284 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided AT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement ? 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 20 Peak Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Hate, HFR 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (4) 0 0 Metlian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lane. 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SH Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1? 6 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config R I v (mph) 21 C(a) (vph) 459 e/c 0.05 951 queue .length 0.14 Control Delay 13.2 LOS B Approach Delay - 13.2 Approach SAS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Deiich - Matthew J. Dslich, P.E. 1 MCS2000: Unsignalized lnteraecticna Heleaae 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyse Michael - Agency/Co.: '.Matthew J. Gelled, P.E. ' Date Performed: ?/12�1... Analysis Time Period:..am 't/ _ Intersection: Timberline/Access H - Jurisdiction: Fo Collins - Analysts Yeez: hurt long btgr Iota Project ID: 0140 East/West Street: Access B _. North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: HS Study period (hra): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustment. Major Street: Apptoach Northbound ...to... Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1220 45 Peek -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1284 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Metlian Type Undivided AT Channelired? , Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement ? 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 45 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade It) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage AT Channelized? No Lanes Contiguratiun R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound EastbourM Movement 1 4 1? 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config R I v (eph) 4? C(m) (vph) 459 a/c 0.10 959 queue length 0.34 Control Delay 13.7 LOS 8 Approach Delay 13.7 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized! Intersections Release 4.1 hew J. Del.ch hew J. Delich. P.E. HC52000: Unaignalired Intersections Hal ... a 4.1 Matthew J. DelichMatthe. J. Delich, P.E. t HCS2000: Signalized Intersections P se 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Ti. -line/Prospect Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/11/00 Juriad: Fort Collins Period: or pm Year : recent long bkgrd total Project ' 0140 E/W St: Prospect NIS St: Timberline _ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I T R I L: .T R .I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 2 1 1- 2 2 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I -'L TR I L T R 1 'L TR I Volume 195 1005 330185 640 45 1425 590 455 135. 690 110 1 Lane Width 112.0 '12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3' -4 1 5 6. 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A A - Thru P I Thru A - A Right P, I Right A A Peds X Peds X. WB Left A - I SS Left A Thru P Thru A Right P' 'Right A Pads .X - I.,. Peds X NB Right A .I EB Right A A SB Right - I WB Right Green .8.0 37.0 - 6.0 6.0 31.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Anal'yst:,Michael'- _. Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. + Area .Type: Alr other areas Date: 11/17/0D ' Jurisd:"Fort Collins Period: ami Year recent hort long bkgrd total Project ID. 140 E/W St: Prospect NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound .1 Westbound Northbound ',I Southbound I I L T 'R I L T R I L ' T' R' ° I L T R I No. Lanes I 1 2 1 I 2 2 0 I 2' ' 2 1 " I 1 7 '2 0 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L' T R. ; I L 'TR I Volume 1100 765 670 1425 1010 80 1455 550 235 135 605 155 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12,0. 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1- 0 I _ 0' .� 0:.':':' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other„areas.'. ? Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 .5: 6- 7� :8 EB Left A 1 NB Left •'A: A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A;';: Thru A P I Thru 1 A Right A P I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right A A I EB Right A A, SB Right I WB Right Green 10.0 7.0 32.0 6.0 �9'0 26.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 - 0.0 3.0 All Red .' 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 - 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs i 'section Performance Summary Appr/, !. Lane:'.: :`.:' A, at Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group F1ow.Rate Grp Capacity (s) VIC g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 159 1770 0.63 0.09 51.6 D T 1309 3539 0.81 0.37 33.8 C 30.1 C R 886 1583 0.39 0.56 12.7 B Westbound L 309 3433 0.29 0.09 43.0 D - TR' 1297 3505 0.56 '0.37 26.7 C 28.5 C Northbound L 515 3433 0.07 0.15 56.2 E T 1380' 3539 0.45 0.39 22.6 C 30.8 C R 823 1583 0.59 0.52 17.6 B -, Southbound L , 124 1770 0.30 0..07 45.5 D - TR 1074 3466 0.78 0.31 35.3 D 35.8 D ' Intersection Delay 31.1 Isec/veh) Intersection LOS C aI HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 -J. Matthew J. Delich _ Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 22=72 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970). 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael - Agency/Co.:'. Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17YOO Analysis Time Period: aOm pm - Intersection: Timberline/Prospect - Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction; Fort Coll s Analysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd(!atal Project ID: '0140 - East/Nest Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity ._... ,Ca).__ _T7c "..g/C Delay LOS, Delay LOS j Eastbound - L 195 1770 0.54 0.11 45.1 D T 1132 ' 3539 0.73' 0:32 34.3 C 33.0 C R 823 1583 0.86 0,52 29.7 C Westbound - ._. .. ... L 610 3433 0.72 0.18- 42.8 "D TR 1365 .3500 0.84 0.39.. 32.6 C 35.4 D Northbound .. �_.. ..- .." L --549 3433 0.87 0.16 55.4' E T 1239 3539 0.47 0.35- 25.5 C 33.0 C R '._902... _._. 1583..__ D•27 ,0.57. 11.1 B Southbound ,. L 124„, 1770 0.30 0.07: 45.5 D TR 892 3431 0.90 0.26 47.5 D 47.4 D - Inteisedtion Delay 36.'l (sec/veh) Intersection i. LOS ='D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 . Matthew J, Delich .. .._... ... _ ... ...._ _. ... .. Matthew J._ Delich, P:E.,,, ... .. :. 2272 Glen Have. -Drive Loveland, CO'80538:,; Phone: .'(970)'. `669-2061 -- - Fax: .1970) 669-5034 " :. E-Mail:' mdelich@frii.com .- OPERATIONAL ' L ANALYSIS .. .. ..r. .. - _ . Analyst: "-Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.... Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Colliaa- Analysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd total Project ID: 0140 - East/Nest Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline HCS2000: Unragoaliced Intersections Release 4.1 TWO -NAY STOP C SUMMARY Intersection Performance Summary _ / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Appr Group Flo. Rate Capacity (sl v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 506 1694 0.08 0.30 25.2 C 25.2 C bound 421 1359 0.65 0.31 33.4 C 480 1601 0.84 0.30 45.7 D 40.7 D hbound 304 1370 0.05 0.56 17.0 B 1699 3539 0.00 0.4B 26.1 C 24.6 C 760 1583 0.34 0.48 17.4 8 hbound 341 1770 0.82 0.61 41.6 D 1909 3536 0.92 0.54 28.9 C 30.7 C Intersection Delay 29.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 :hew J. Delich - .he. J. Delich, P.E. - Glen Haven Drive _ !land, Co 80538 le: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 iil: mdelichBfrii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS .yet: Michael 4cy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. . Performed: 11/17/00 .ysis Time Period: am -rsection: Timberline/Custer i Type: All other areas .sdiction: Fort Collins .ysis Year: recent short on kgr total iect ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline N Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Dete Performed: 7112/01 Analysis Time Period:(fVpm Intersection: Drake/Access G ion: JurAnalysis ion: Fort Coon Analysis short 9 kgr total Project If: 0140 - East/west Street: brake Notth/South Street: Acceaa G Intersection Orientation: EM Study period (hrsl: 0.25 vehicle volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 fi L T R L T R Volume 405 10 30 420 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 %." Hourly Flow Rate, NFR 426 10 31 442 Percent Heavy vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR 1 T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbountl Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 50 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 52 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Gratle (81 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage AT Channelixad? Lanes La U 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WS Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 LR v (aphi 33 67 C(ml (vphl 1124 448 s/c 0.03 0.15 95% queue length 0.09 0.52 Control Delay 8.3 14.4 Los A a Approach Delay 14.4 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsi9nalized lntetseceions Release 4A TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY yst: Michael cy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Time Period: �ACCeaa es crib-: section; G adiction: Fort CO ysis Year: short ongns k9rd total _ in I0: 0140 /West Street: Drake - '- h/South Street: Acceaa G rsection Orientation: EW Study period (hre): 0.25 , Vehicle Vol woes and Adjustments r Street: Approach Eastbound Wea tbound - Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 - ^ L T R I L T R 545 35 60 550 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ly Flow Rate, HFR 573 36 63 576 - ant Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 n Type 'TWLTL hannelized7 - - 0 1 1 Sguration TR L T ream Signal? No No r Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R s 25 30 hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 APPENDIX F ly Flow Rate, NFR 26 10 sot Heavy Vehicles 2 2 ant Grade (1) 0 D in Storage 1 so Approach: Exists? No storage ra nnelized7 a 0 0 iguta[1on LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service rach EH WB Northbound Southbound rent 1- 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Config L I LR ih) 63 36 (vph) 970 342 0.06 0.11 7eue length 0.21 0.35 :ol Delay 9.0 16-0 A C ,acn Delay 16.8 ,acn SAS C RCS2000: Onsigrolized Intersections Release 4.1 ew J. Delich .ew J. Delich. P.E. Intersection Performance Suvun 1ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane G_ 1 Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 318 3433 0.50 0.11 43.0 D 100 3539 0.48 0.20 35.9 D 41.7 D .t 681 1583 0.92 0.43 44.5 D We I 195 1770 0.54 0.11 45.1 D - 'R 658 3288 0.76 0.20 42.9 D 43.3 D lorthbound 652 3433 0.87 0.19 51.6 D TR 1470 3501 0.80 0.42 30.1 C 37.1 D 3outhbound L 336 1770 0.77 0.19 46.7 D T 1486 3539 0.88 0.42 34.3 C 32.2 C i 902 1583 0.39 0.57 12.2 B Intersection Delay = 37.0 lsec/veh) Intersection LOS D MCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 4atthew J. Delich 4atthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 60538 Phone: 1970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS_ _ Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Ti erline/Drake . Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short on kgr total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street, 'Drake .Timberline Intersection Performance Summary ,Tpr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate - ' 'Delay LOS 'rp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound -. ,TR 473 -- 1690 - 0.06 0.20 , 26-6,,, C 26.6 C Westbound 396 1365 0-41 0.29 29.3 5C­ :R 447 1595 0.58 0.28 32.8 - C 31-4 C lorthbound 234 1770 0.05 0.63 12.4 B T 1982 3539 0.01 0.56 21.3 C 20-3 C 1 886 1583 0.18 0.56 11.2 B Southbountl L 234 1770 0.54 0.63 19.9 B TR 1961 3537 0.73 0.56 18.0 B 18-9 B Intersection Delay . 21.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 4atthew J. Delich .Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 GLen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@£ril.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS_ Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: (Opm Intersection: Timberline/Custer Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins An - Year: recent short lon bkgsd total p; ID: 0140 East/Wes[ Street North/South Street Custer Timberline HCS20r -ignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Custer Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas ! Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins Periotl: am pm Year : recent short on bkgrd total, Project TO: 0140 E/W St: Custer NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbountl I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 _ 1 No. Lanes I 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 I 7 2 0 I LGConfig I LTA I L TR I L T R L TR I Volume 15 15 15 1155 10 235 110 1520 155 1120 1370 5 Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: Ali other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A Right P Peds X Peds X WB Left A "I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right, A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 6.0 56.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Custer Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 'Jurisd: Fort Collins Period; am pm Year : recent short lon kgr total Project ID: 0140 E/W St: Custer NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R L T R I' I 1 I No. Lanes I 0 1 0 I I I 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LTR I L TR L T R I L. TR I Volume 15 20 15 1260 25 360 115 1295 245 1265 1660 10 1 Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 .1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other, areas Signal operations___ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EE Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X Peds X - WB Left A I SB Left A A P Thru A 1 Thru A P Right A I Right A P Pets X I Peds X NS Right I- EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 30.0 6.0 6.0 48.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: unaignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SO Y -at: Michael :y/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 7/12/01 aia Time Period: am® auction: Timberline/Access E .diction: Fort Ca •.la Year: short on nbkgr total .or ID: 0140 'West Street: Access E ,/South Street: Timberline .section Orientation: NS Study period Ihrsl: 0.25 Vehicle Volume. and Adjustments Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 .y Flow Rate, HFR 1521 1894 26 ant Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- n Type undivided lannelized? 2 2 0 ,oration T T TR :cam Signal? No No Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 ly Flow Pate, HER 21 ant Heavy vehicles 2 ant Grade (%) 0 0 n Storage ad Approach: Exists? Storage lannelized? No Lguracicn R Delay, queue Length, and Level of Service iach BNB SB Westbound Eastbound nent 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Genf, I I R (-Ph) 309 0.07 queue length 0.22 rol Delay 17.5 C each Delay 17.5 each LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 w J. Delich new J. Delich. P.E. Intersection Performance Summary__ / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Group Flow Rate , Capacity Is) VIC g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS i 515 3433 0.83 991 3539 0.26 792 1583 0.67 pound 142 1770 0.52 682 3247 0.62 hbound 618 3433 0.75 1511 3515 0.92 hbound 230 1770 0.71 1345 3539 0.72 902 1583 0.25 Intersection Delay - 34.6 0.15 52.0 D 0.28 28.1 C 33.4 C 0.50 21.1 C 0.08 47.6 D 0.21 37.6 D 39.1 D 0.18 43.9 D 0.43 36.3 D 38.2 D 0.13 51.4 D 0.38 29.8 C 29.3 C 0.57 10.9 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HC52000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 hew J. Delich hew J. Delich, P.E. Glen Haven Drive land, CO 80538 e: 1970) 669-2061 Fax: (910) 669-5034 il: mdelichNfrii.com _OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ___ yst: Michael cy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed: 11/17/00 Yale Time Period: am pm traction: lmberline/Drake Type: All other areas sdiction: Fort Collins ysis Year: recent short on kqr total ect ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Drake Timberline BCS2000: Signal Intersections Release 4.1 1 1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas _ Data: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: (ate pm Year : recent short on bkgr total Project r: 0140 E/W St: Drake NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 No. Lanes I 2 2 1 I 1 2 0 I 2 2 0 I 1 2 1 I ' LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L T R I Volume 1405 240 505 170 180 220 1440 1260 60 1155 920 210 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1- 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ _ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ES Left A AI NB Left A A Thru A A I Thru A P Right A A I Right A P Peds x I Peds x WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds x I Peds x NS Right I EB Right A A 1 SB Right A A I WB Right Green 7.0 7.0 21.0 12.0 5.0 38.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type:. All other.:abeas _ Date: 11/11/00 Jurisd: Forte Collins? Period: am pm Year : recent shr[ o�long bkgrtl total Project ID' 140 -� - E/W St: Drake NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMt0,RY''-L1r ' I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I-Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T A I _ 1 No. Lanes I 2 2 1 I 1 2 0 i 2 20 I 1 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L T R I Volume 1180 320 595 1100 250 225 1540 1040 80 1245 1240 335 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTON Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 -0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _Signal Operations_ Phase Combination I 2 3 4 1 .5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds x Peds x WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A Thru P Right A I Right P - Peds x I Peds x NB Right I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right Green 10.0 20.0 18.0 42.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Unsignaliied Imtsr.ed[ieoe Release 4.1 T' 'Y STOP CONTROL SUNQ ARY Intersection Performance Sump Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane t _ Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (3) v/e g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Imo_ L 478 1770 0.18 0.27 29.1 C 24.5 C R 586 1583 0.16 0.37 21.2 C W� d Northbound L 233 1170 0.16 0.65 18.9 B T 2265 3539 0.62 0.64 11.3 B 11.5 B Southbound T 2053 3539 0.69 0.58 24.9 C 24.7 C R 918 1583 0.02 0.5B 8.9 A Intersection Delay - 19.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/12/01 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Timberline/Access C Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: short on kgrd oral Project ID: 0140 ,. East/West Street North/South Street Access C Timberline - RCS2000: Unsignalized lnters..:tiona Felease 4.1 TWO -MAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich. P.E. Date Performed:-7/12/01 - Analysis Time Period: am® , Intersection: Timberline/Access Jurisdiction: Fort Ce line Analysis Year: short ono kgrd total Project to: 0140 _ Seat/Wes[ Street: Ad ... a D _ - aor[h/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hraj:- 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 - 6 L T R I L T R volume 75 1310 1005 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 4ourly Flaw Rate, HER 78 1442 1900 .31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -' Median Type undivided RT Channeliied? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Wea[bountl Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Were, HER 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (11 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channellred? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westoound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 A v lI 78 21 C( 301 307 v/, 0.26 0.07 951 length 1.01 0.22 Control Delay 21.1 17.6 Los C C Approach Delay 17.6 Approach LOS C Analyst: Ma Agency/Co.: Mat-.. J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7 12/01 Analysis Time Period: a pm In - Jurisdiction: Fort C Analysis Year: short ion bkgrd total Project ID: 0140 East/Meat Street: Add... D North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 1865 1215 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 1963 1278 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- '- '- Median Type Undivided RT Chanhelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upatream Signal? be No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 9 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T A Volume - 40 Peak Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 42, Percent Heavy Vehicle. 2 Percent Grade (1) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exista? _ Storage RT Chennelized? No Laos. Configuration A Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB -SB Westbound Eastbound w Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I R C(ml (vph) 534 a•• v/c 0.04 0.09 95% queue length 0.12 0.29 Control Delay 12.0 13.4 Los B B Approach Delay 13.4 Approach LOS S HCS2000: Unsignaliied Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. -1 HC12000: Unsignaliied Intetaeclionr Releaae 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: Y12/01 Analysis Time Period: (0 pm Intersection: Timberline/Access E Jurisdiction: Fort Cd 1 Analysis Year: short o g kgrd total Project 10: 0140 East/West Street: Access E North/South Street: Timmerline Intei.ection Orientation: NS Study period (hre): 0.25 Vehicle volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound sodtnbouna Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T A Volume .. 1885 1250 Peak -Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Pate, HER 1984 1315 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -" -' Median Type Undivided RT Channeliied? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration T T TR Up.tre.m Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastboun0 Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T A I L T R Volume 35 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (1) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? storage AT Chann<11 ietl? NO Lanes Configuration A Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB I SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config R v (vph) 36 C(ml (vph) 461 OB v/c 0.25 13. 951 queue length Control Delay 3.5 LOS B Approach Delay 13.5 ^ App... on LOS a UCS2000: Ovignaiized intersections Release 4.1 HCS2000: U..ignsliied Intersection. Release 4.1 Matthew J. De1Lch Matthew J. Delich - Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Intersection Performance Summary -r/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Ap)_ :h e Group Flow Rate . Capacity (s) - v/c g/C Delay LOS- Delay LOS 195 1770 0.70 0.11 53.7 D 12743539 0.84 0.36 34.4 C 30.7 C 855 1583 0.63 0.54 17.5 B tbound .. 618 3433 0.86 0.18 51.6 ❑ 1504 .3498 0.99 0.43 50.1' D '50.5 D thbound - 481 3433 0.82 0.14 52.7 D 1097 3539 0.81 0.31 35.5 D 36.2 D 839 1583 0.31 0.53 13.4 B thbound - - 124 1770 0.47 0.07 47.5 D 949, 3539 0.92 0.24 -51.6 D 45.3 D - 617 1583 - 0.36 - 0.39 22.0 C Intersection Delay a 40.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS . D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 thew J. Delich- thew J. Delich, P.E. .. 2.Glen Haven Drive eland, CO 80538 ne: (910) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 all: mdelich@frii.com _ OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS lyst: - Michael - ncy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. - a Performed: 11/1700' - lysis Time Period: am m ' etsection: Timberline/Prospect a:Type: All other areas indiction: Fort Collins lysis Year: - recent short long kgrd total ject ID: 0140 East/Went Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline Intersection Performance Summary r% Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach e Group Flow Rate Capacity (s) VIC g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 513 1770 0.15 0.29 26.5 C 24.4 C 617 1583 0.05 0.39 19.0 'B tbound thbound 276 1770 0.36 0.63 12.4 B 2194 3539 0.85 0.62 18.6 B 19.3 B thbound - 1982 3539 0.63 0-56 16.6 B 16.3 B 886 1583 0.07 0.56 10.2 B Intersection Delay - 17.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 thew J. Delich thew J. Delich, P.E. 2 Glen Haven Drive eland, CO 80530 ne: (970) 669-2062 ail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: (970) 669-5034 IONAL ANALYSIS lyst: Michael ncy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. e Performed: 7/12/01 lysis Time Period: (9)pm ' ersection: Timberline/Access C a Type: All other areas isdiction: Fort Co lim lysis Year: short ong kgr total iect ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Access C Timberline HCS2000: Signal' Intersections Release 4.1 z Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Access C Agency: Matthew J- Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/12/01 Jurisd: Fort Period: �pm Year : short on bkgrtl total Project 0140 E/W St: Access C NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R L T R I L T R 1 1_ 1 No. Lanes I 3 0 1 I 0 0 0 I 1 2 0 I 0 2 1 I ' LGConfig L R I I L T T R i Volume 175 30 1 195 1710 .I 1195 55 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 10 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _Signal Operations Phase Combination-! 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru Thru A P Right A I Right Reds X I Reds X WB Left i SB Left Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Reds X i Petls X NB Right EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 28.0 6.0 56.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 sets - HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Access C Agency: Matthew J.,,Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas _ Date: 7/12/01 Jurisd: Fort ,Co Period: am pm Year : short bdg bkg Cd total 1 Project ID: 140 - E/W St: Access C HIS St: Timberline , SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY. I E..tboumd I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T 'R I L T R I L T R I 1 No. Lanes I 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 I 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 I ' LGConfig I L R I I L T I T R I Volume 180 90 1 135 1335 1 1745 15 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 1 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru I Thru A P Right A Right Peds X I Reds X WS Left 1 SB Left Thru I Thru P Right Right P Peds X I Pads X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 6.0 58.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2-0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS20n- Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 APPENDIX E I, Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity is) v/c g/C_. Delay-LOS �­,Delay LOS "'.. Eastbound -y _ L 230 1770 0.57 0.13 44.9 '-0•.` T 1451 3539 0.95 0.41 38.2 D 34.1 C R 902 1583 0.36 Westbound L 309 3433 0.43 0.09 44:.0 `D_ TR 1296 3504 0.72 0.37 30.6 C'- 32.3 C Northbound L 412 3433 0.79 0.12 52.9 D T 1239 3539 0.64 0.35 26.7 C 30.9 C R 7601563 0.71 0.48 23.7 C Southbound L 124 1770 0.43 0.07 46.9 D T 1062 3539 0.82 0.30 37.4 D 34.B C R 744 1583 0.21 0.47 15.7 B Intersection Delay - 32.9 Isec/veh) Intersection LOS C MCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive - Loveland, CO 80538 . Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: ® pm Intersection: Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Ar is Year: recent short long kqr total F ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline Analyst':Michael Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Agency:' Matthew J. De-ch, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: s'A/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: ® pm Year : recent short 4axEitotal Project ID: 0140 E/W St: Prospect NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound Southbountl I L T R L T R I L T R L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 2 1 1 2 2 '0 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R I Volume 1125 1305 305 1125 830 60' 1310 750 515 150 830 145 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8._- EB Left A A 'I NB Left A A Thru A P Thru A. A Right A P `I i Right;.: A A Peds XI Peds X WB Left A - I''SB Left A Thru P. F- _. Thru A Right P ' I ` - Right A Peds .....,.r^.. X I )' Peds X NB Right,_.-' A I'EB Right A A SB Right,: A A I WB Right Green 8.0 4.0 37.0 6.0 5.0 30.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 Seca HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am® Year : recent short on kgr total Project ID: 0140 E/W St: Prospect NIS St: Timberline ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbountl i I L T R I L T R L T R L T R I I 1 No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R 1 Volume 1130 1020 510 1505 1310 110 1375 840 245 155 740 210 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ES Left A I NB Left A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P I Right A A Peds X I Fed. X WB Left A A I SB Left A Thru - -A P I Thru A Right A P Right A . Pad. X Peds X NB Right' A A I EB Right A A SB Right - A. I WB Right Green 10.0 .7.0 .36.0 6.0 7.0 24.0 Yellow - 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red - 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 .. Cycle Length: 100.0 Secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 yst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/CL cy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Col ins od: ® pm Year : recent hot bkgrd total ect ID: 0140 St: Custer NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I'L T A I L T R I Lanes I O 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 0 1 ,nfig I LTR I L TR I L T R I L TR I me IS 1 15 1160 1 110 110 1270 60 140 1190 5 Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 ,Lion 0.25 Area Type: A11 other areas Signal Operations ;e Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 Left A I WE Left A P Thru A Thru P Right A _ I Right P Peds x I Peds x Left A I SE Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A Right P I Peds x Peds x Right I EB Right Right I WB Right an 28.0 6.0 56.0 Low 3.0 0.0 3.0 Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 yst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Custer cy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 11/17/OO Jurisd: Fort Collins - od: am ® Year : recent hor b gr total ect I0: 0140 St: Custer NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Lanes I 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 0 I .nfig I LTR I L TR I L T R I L TR me 15 1 15 1105 1 85 115 1055 170 1115 1345 10 Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 10 I ;Lion 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal operations __ ;e Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 Left A I NB Left A P Thru A Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds x I Peds x Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds x I Peds x Right I EB Right Right I WB Right an 28.0 6.0 56.0 .ow 3.0 0.0 3.0 Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs I I Intersects rformance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat .ios Lane Group Approach . Lane Group Flo. Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS LTR 451 1610 0.05 0.28 26.3 C 26.3 C Westbound L 401 1384 0.42 0.29 29.4 C TR 444 1586 0.26 0.28 28.3 C 29.0 C Northbound L 279 1770 0.04 0.63 10.2 B T 1982 3539 0.67 0.56 17.4 B 17.0 B R 866 1583 0.07 0.56 10.2 B Southbound L 257 1770 0.16 0.63 11.8 B TR 1981 3537 0.63 0:56 16.5 B 16.3 B Intersection Delay = 17.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. - 2212 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80530 I Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: ® pm Intersection: Timberline/Custer Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent short kgr total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline __Intersection Performance Summary pp Ar/ Lane _Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate - Grp Capacity Is) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay_LOS,. - Eastbound ' LTR 452 1615 0.05 0.28 ` 26.3" C- 26.3 C Westbound _ L 401 1384 0.28 0.29 27.8 C TR 444 1586 0.20 0.26 27.7 C 27.7 C Northbound L 237 1770 0.07 0.63 12.2 B T 1982 3539 0.56 0.56 15.3 B 14.7 B R 886 1563 0.20 0.56 11.4 B Southbound L 316 1770 0.38 0.63 11.1 B TR - 1980 3535 0.72 0.56 18.5 B 16.0 B i Intersection Delay - 17.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. I 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS___ Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am(& Intersection: Timberline/Custer Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Coll ns Analysis Year: recent shor bkgr total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Custer Timberline HCS2000: Signalized Intersections P�* ase 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: T_ line/Drake 'Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/11/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins i Period:(g)pm Year : recent shor long kgztl total Project ID: 0140 E/W St: Drake NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L. T R I _I No. Lanes 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 1355 130 435 125 170 180 1320 1045 20 190 765 175 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A A I Thru A P Right A A Right A P Peds X Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NS Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 9.0 6.0 21.0 10.0 6.0 38.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All:other areas Date: 11/17/00 _ Jurisd:. Fort Coll s .Period: am© 'Tear recent hors, long kgc total Project ID: 0140 _ ._... E/W St: Drake 'N/S St:'.Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY$} I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound ,I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L "T4' R I L T R I _ I No. Lanes 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 20 I 1 2 0 LGConfig L TP. I L TR I L TR I L TR I volume 1150 165 350 120 205 185 1355 765 25 1145 1100 275 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 p 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations__ _ p -ha-5 T Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A - Thru A A Thru P Right A A Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A SB Left A Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peas X I Peds x NB Right I EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 6.0 4.0 20.0 12.0 48.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs rsection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane at Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) VIC g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 549 3433 0.68 0.16 43.0 D TR 045 3131 0.70 0.27 35.6 D 30.5 D Westbound L 177 1770 0.15 0.10 41.5 D TR 606 3267 0.54 0.21 36.0 D 36.4 D Northbound L 584 3433 0.58 0.11 39.6 D TR 1553 3529 0.72 0.44 24.7 C 20.1 C Southbound L 195 1770 0.49 0.11 43.8 D TR 1307 3440 0.76 0.38 31.1 C 32.2 C Intersection Delay - 32.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (910) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@£rii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: (op. Intersection: Timberline/Drake Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent hoc ion bkgr total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Drake Timberline Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOG i L -378 3433 0.42 0.11 42.3 D TR 763 3179 0.71 0.24 37.9 D 38.9 D westbound L 124 1770 0.17 0.07 44.4 D TR 657 3287 0.63 0.20 38.5 D 38.7 D Northbound L 446 3433 0.84 0.13 55.7 E TR 1691 3523 0.49 0.48 18.7 B 30.2 C Southbound L 230 1770 0.67 0.13 48.5 D TR 1648 3433 0.88 0.48 30.3 C 32.1 C Intersection Delay . 33.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80530 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Agency/Cc.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Area Type: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0140 Drake Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11/17/00 am Timberline/Drake All other areas For Colli s recent hart long bkgr total East/West Street North/South Street Timberline RCS2000: unsignalized lnteraections "lease 4.1 HC52000: Unslgnal izea lntersactiona Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY TARO -MAT STOP ' 'OL SUMMARY ,at: Michael Analyse: Michael :y/Co.: Matthew J. Delich. P.E. Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delic,,, P.E. Performed: 7/12/01 Date Performed: i/1®1 /sis.Time Period: mom. ..� Analysis Time Period: as 0 :lec[idn: mberline/Access D ,diction: F t Collins Ills Year: � long kgz total Intersection: Timberline/Acceaa Jux Sadiction, F t Collins Analyeie Year: long kgx total set ID: 0140 Project I0: 0140 /Welt Street: Access D East/West Street: Access D a/South Street: Timberline North/South Street: Timberline caection Orientation: NS Study period (hr.): 0.25 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrl): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments r Street: Approach Northbound Southb0und Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T A 1 L T R L T R I L T R he 20 1560 960 10 volume 75 1025 1505 30 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 - Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ly Flow Rate, HFR 21 1642 1010 SO Hourly Flow Bate, HFR 78 1078 1584 31 ant Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- n Type undivided Median Type Undivided hennelized? AT Channelized? 1 2 2 0 Lanes 1 2 2 0 iguration L T T TR configuration L T T TR ream Signal? No No ' Upstream Signal? No No r Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement ? 8 9 1 10 11 12 Movement ? 8 9 1 30 11 12 L T R I L T R L T R 1 L T A me .40 Volume 20 Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 ly Flow Rate, HFR 42 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 ant Heavy vehicles 2 Percent Heavy vehicles 2 ant Grade 1\) 0 0 Percent Grade (\1 0 0 n Storage Median Storage ad Approach: Exists? Flared Approach: Exists? Storage Storage hennelized? No RT Channelized? No Lanes iguration R Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service oath NB BB Meath mund Eastbound Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound -ant 1 4 1? B 9 1 10 11 12 Movement 1 4 I T_ 8 9 1 SO 11 12 Config L I I R Lane Config L I R ph) 21 42 v (vph) . 78 21 (vph) 676 562 Clml (vph) 400 379 0.03 0.07 v/c 0.19 _ .0.06 queue length 0.10 0.24 951 queue length 0.71 _ 0.10 rol Delay 10.5 11.9 Control Delay 16.2 15.1 B B LOS C C ach Delay 11.9 Approach Delay 15.1 oath LOS B Approach LOS C HCS2000: unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 HCS2000: Unsignalired Intersections Release 4.1 hew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich hew J. Olich, P.E. Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HJS2UUD: Uusiynalized lntwreoctiuns Release 4.5 HCL2000: Un sly nalixed futetsOu[icus R111 ,se 4.1 TWO -NAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY yet: Mi chaei Analyst: Michael .cy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Agency/Co.: Matthew. J. Delich, P.E. , Performed: 7/12/01 Date Performed: T/12101 1 11 y!1! Time Period: �pe / Analysis Time Period: am `�� , at,Timberline/Access E Intersection: Timberline/Access E ldlctiM `For�_ ,Collins yais Year: V Lang kgz total Jurisdiction: Fo Colitn5 Analysis Year: hart long bkgrd total act ID: 0140 _ Project IO: 0140, /Went Street: Access E East/West Street: Access E h/South street: Timberline North/South Street: Timberline rsection Orientation: NS Study period (bra): 0.25 Intersection Orientation: HE Study period (hrs): 0:25 Vehicle volumes and Adjustments vehicle Volumes and Adjustments r Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Major Street: Approach Northbound Sou'Mound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 - L T R I L T- R L T R I L T R 1580 -Hour 995 5 Volume 1100 1505 25 Factor, PHF 0.95 1.95 0.95 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 ' ly Flow Rate, HFR 1663 1041 5 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1157 1584 26 ant Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -' n Type undivided Median Type undivided hannelized? AT Channelized? 2 2 0 Lanes 2 2 0 iguration T T TR - Configuration T T Tit ream Signal? No No Upstream Signal? No No z Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement T 8 9 1 10 11 12 Movement ? 6 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R L T A I L T R - V.I.35 20 Hour Factor, PUP 0.95 Peak Hour Factor, PHF D.95 ly Flow Rate, HFR 36 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 ant Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 ant Grade 1\1 0 0 Percent Grade 1\1 0 0 an Storage Median Storage ad Approach: Exists? Flared Approach: Exists? Storage Storage _ hennas lied? No RT Cnennelizetl? No 6I Lane! ig uzat ion R Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service oath 14B SB Westbound Eastbound sent 1 4 1? 8 9 1 10 11 12 Config I I R 1 phl 550 0.07 queue length 0.21 rol Delay - 12.0 e oath Delay 12.0 oath LOS B Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1? B 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I R v (vphl 21 Cie) (Vph) 301 P/C 0.06' 958 queue length 0.17 Control Delay 15.0- LOS B Approach Delay 15.0- Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsigna Tired In[e[sec[i.ns Release 4.1 w J. Dairen new J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Umignalizad Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. ce ieh. P.E. i HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Rv" -se 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Ti. .ine/Access C Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: A11 other areas Date: 7/12/01 Jurisd: For Collins Period: ®pm Year hors long kgrd total Project ID: 0140 E/W St: Access C N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 i 1 2 0 I 0 2 0 I LGConfig I L R I I L T I TR I Volume 175 30 1 195 1465 940 55 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 1 1. Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 e ES Left A I NB Left A P Thru Thru A P Right A i Right Peds x I Peds X WB Left I SB Left Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Peds x 1 Peds x NO Right I EB Right A - SS Right I WB Right Green 30.0 - 6.0 54.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 1 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Access C Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 7/12/01 _ Jurisd:Fort':Cofl_ins Period: am© - i' Year..: ort long kg oTak Project ID: 0140 E/W St: Access C. N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -SUMMARY-:[--' I Eastbound I Westbound I. Northbound I.. Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T' 2� P'� I' L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 I 1 2 0 0 2 0 LGConfig I L R I L T TR I Volume 180 90 1 135 990 1445 15 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 1 RTON Vol 1 0 I 1 I. 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A P Thru I Thru A P Right A I Right Pecs X - Peds X WE Left SE Left Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 30.0 6.0 54.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs section Performance Summary Appr/ Lane A t Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flo. ..ate Grp Capacity Isl v/c 91C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 549 1770 0.14 0.31 25.0 C 22.9 C R 649 15e3 0.05 0.41 17.0 B Westbound Northbound L 321 1770 0.31 0.61 11.2 B T 2123 3539 0.73 0.60 15.5 B 15.2 B Southbound TR 1895 3510 C.55 0.54 16.2 B 16.2 0 Intersection Delay - 15.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich - Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive , Loveland, CO 80530 Phone: 1970) 669-2061 _ Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com n PERATiONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J.\Delich, P.E. Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: 7'2/02 pm Intersection: imberline/Access C Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fo C0111n Analysis Year: hort long bkgrd total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Access C Timberline Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (sl v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 549 1770 0.15 0.31 25.1 C 21.7 C R 649 1583 0.15 0.41 18.6 B Westbound Northbound L 233 1770 0.16 0.61 15.7 B T 2123 3539 0.49 0.60 11.5 B 11.7 B Southbound TR 1908 3534 0.81 0.54 22.5 C 22.5 C Intersection Delay - 16.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P"E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@Erii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 7/12/01 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Ti erline/Access C Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fo t Collins Analysis Year: RO long kgrtl total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Access C Timberline RCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.) lyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/feet ncy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other -areas e: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Coll' s i od: am pm Year : recent hor long kgrtl total ject ID: 140 St; Prospect NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound' •.I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T .' R 1 1 Lanes I .1 2 1 I 2 2 0 I 2 2 1 I 1 , 2 0 - I on£ig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L TRel ume 1100 785 490 1465 1010 80 1355 490 220 135 50514 155 1 e Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0,112.0 12.0 +I R Vol i 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 'I ation 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations se Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 Left A I NB Left A -A Thru P I Thru -. A A Right P I Right A A Petls A I.. Peds _)f. ' Left A A ,I SB :Left. A (- Thru A .P I ': Thcu A Right A P I Right A Pets x I Perim X _ Right A A I EB Right A A. ..... Right I NO Right - en 10.0 6.9-' 34.0 6.0 6.0 28.0 low 0.0 Q.'0 3.0 .,. 0.0 0.0 : 3.0 Red 0.0 ....0.0 2.0 ,:0.0 6.0 .2.0 Cycle`.Length: 100.0 secs 4 Intersect arformance Summary Appr/ ::Lane Adj Sat .its Lane Group Approach a Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) VIC g/C Delay LOS Delay 1.05 L 195 1770 0.54- 0.11 45.1 D T 1203 3539 0.69 0.34 31.6 C 28.3 C R 807 1503 0.64 0.51 19.5 B Westbound L 584 3433 0.84 0.17 50.5 D TR 1400 3500 0.82 0.40 30.0 C 36.7 D Northbound L 446 3433 0.04 0.13 55.7 E T 1203 3539 0.43 0.34. 25.7 C 32.9 C R 871 1583 0.27 0.55 12.0 B Southbound L 124 1770 0.30 0.07,- 45.5 D TR 956 3415 0.73 0.28 35.4 D 35.9 D Intersection Delay a 33.2. (sec/veh) Intetsection.LOS e C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich - Matthew J. Delich, P.E:- 2272 Glen Haven-Orive - Loveland. CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich8frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Timberline/Pzospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent hor long kgr total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline - n1- 9w HL52000: Un_:i91133ired Inler+eetions helease 4.1 HCS2UDO: Relv,Se 4.1 Two -MAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Two -.AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,at: Michael Analyst: Michael cy/Ce.: Matthew J. Delrch, P.E. Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Performed 7112/01 - Date Performed: 1/12/01 yais Time Period: Analysis Time Period: am fa - ectl0n Timine/Access C Intersection. - Timherline/Access C '- act ctL on: F Collin yaia Year: s�hror�long bkgrtl total Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: hd[ long kgrtl total - ) - ect ID: 0140 Project ID: 014D - - - - /West Street: Access C East/West Street: Access C h/South Street: Timberline North/South Street: Timberline ' reaction Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0:25' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments [ Street: Approach Northbound sautnbound Major Street: Approach Northbound Southeound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R L T R I L T A m 95 146 940 55 Volume 35 990 1445 1 Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peek -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ly Flow Rate, HFR 100 1542 989 57 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 36 1042 1521 15. ant Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- n Type TWLTL Median Type TWLTL hennelized? AT Channelired? 1 2 2 0 Lanaa 1 2 2 0 iguration L T T TR Configuration L T T TR ream Signal? No No Upstream Signal? No No r Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R L T R I L T R A75 30 ( Volume 80 90 Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 ly Flow Rate, HFR 78 31 Hourly Flaw Rate, HFR 84 94 ant Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 ant Grade (1) 0 0 Percent Grade (1) 0 0 sn Storage 1 Median Storage 1 ad Approach: Exists? Flared Approach: Exists? Storage Storage nnelized? No RT Channelired? No 1 Lanes 1 I iguration L R Configuration L A Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Iach NS SB Westbound Eastbound Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound sent 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Config L I L R Lane Config L I I L A 2h) 100 78 31 v (oh) 36 64 94 (vph) 661 154 552 C(m) (vph) 429 125 400 0.25 0.51 0.06 v/c 0.08 0.67 0.23 queue length 0.53 2.45 0.10 951 queue length 0.27 3.61 0.90 rol Delay 11.4 1 _ 50.2 11.9 Control Delay 14.2 79.0 16.7 B F B LOS B F C 7ach Delay 39.3 Approach Delay 46.1 each LOS E Approach LOS E HCS2000: Onsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 w J. Delich iew J. Delich, P.E. RCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich - Matthew J. Da ich, P.E. I a PM: 5730". HdA H 3 V 0 H d d V. �fnj '133HIS UO 1v 4C-9 or eD M 0 Z.. U < 0 < D>0 _J > tu C) "< DO I 0Z LL v, 0 wwr 0 2 02< WOO X a_ < oc CD W cE 0 -X' <UO < Ht, '<Z �0. ­o� 'v Rev. 3189 O ------ ----- HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 J urisd:. Fort qal-lins. - P:riod:('. ear 7-ie-cent D-c long total P oject-1-1): 0140 E/W St: Prospect NIS St: Tindh.rline'- t SIGNALIZED- INTERSECTION. SUMMARY ' _' und I Fastbound I Westbound I N6rthbo"' I _ I Southbound L I R I L T A L L R, I L T R I No. Lan.. I 1 2 1 I 2 2 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 0 LGConfig I L T A I I IN I L I R I I TR I Volume 195 1005 280 1105 640 45 1270 500 445 135 660 110 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12-0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 PION Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations -i-ha.. Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 6 EB Left A I ME Left A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P Right A A Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right p I Right A Pods x I Peds x NB Right A EB Right A A SB Right I WE Right Green 8.0 38.0 6.0 6-0 32.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0-0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs APPENDIX D in;erse6tion Performance Summary Tppr/ 'Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rateli­ - Grp Capacity (3) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 159 1770 0.63 0.09 .51.6 D T 1345 3539 0.79 0.36 32.1 C 29.5 C A 071 1583 0.34 0.55 12.7 a Westbound L 309 3433 0.36 0.09 43.5 D IN 1332 3505 0.54 0.38 25.8 C 28.1 C Northbound 1 446 3433 0.64 0.13 44.3 D T 1345 3539 0.39 0.38 22.8 C 25.B C R 807 1583 0:58 - 0.51 18.1 B Southbound L 124 1770 0.30 0.07 45.5 D TR 1100 3463 0.73 0.32 32.7 C 33.3 C Intersection Delay -.28.9 Is I ec/veh) Intersection LOS C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E, 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland,,. CO 80538, Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: MO) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: ®pm Intersection: Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent hor longQkgr total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS I.evebf--Servi¢ Aver.ge T.W Ddey xW<h A <10 B >10W<15 C >15W_<25 D > 25 and < 35 E >35 aM<50 F 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Average Tool Dday sNveb A <10 B >10 and<20 C >20W<35 D >35.d<55 E >55 W<80 F > 80 �2b<SiPx- m a ¢ w �3i . 2ZW O I " W w I ~ If1 w ID fA O O zZ J _ �a1 J CO < W z U o < <w3 ¢J V 2 3 g ¢ J oaz o b < >>o b < W 1 .Q 2 2 J N Q ^ pg< J ca C1 Q O LL O Z ww¢ O N O J O < Z. 1-J� I H ¢ W Z o OF 3oi o I W¢¢ o (n W,o O � n3a iJ < U U Z o >ccw e 0 0 p0p 0 o N N b �am u. tOo Q fO'1 �. HdA — H:)tlOHddb' 3vgn 10A HOIH o CO 133HIS HONI ? z x w ad go oZ 7 7 C d 9C-9 H., 3199 p( APPENDIX C - „P�++2G f6Jrr, a oz _ V ! �Jg V) W N W W z �_ Z i Z acc Q g Ear O Z Q< J 3 3 o �CQ �\ W J z o= Ogg o J ¢c J N Q p0< < OC w w O mom 11� O O ¢ZW N O Q ` = 2 F ¢wZ o 0 3o2 ¢Y N O2< W O I w0¢ o Lei w W m o W Q " < cm o N "-0cm a3' 3 10 < 2 Q Z (O Ifl V C] N W HdA — HOHOHddtl MmOe HOIH o Cw 133HIS HOMIN z i Lr) V eC-9 Her. 3189 o HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst:.. Michael .. .Inter.: Ti- -line/Drake Agerigyi �matihev J: Delich;-P:ES Area Type other areas - Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fc .oIlins Period: am® Year scent short bkgrtl total Project ID: 0140 E/W St: Drake NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound :,.I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I N. ss 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 I LGL-.._lg I LT R I LT- R I L TR I L T R I Volume 1133 19 314 19 139 104 1265 640 5 123 873 217 1 Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 01 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A Right A P Peds x Peds - x WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru il P Right A I Right P Peds X Peds x NB Right I ES Right A A SB Right I WB Right A Green 22.0 _ 6.0 ,9'.0 53.0 Yellow, 3.0 0.0 0:0 3.0 All Red 2,0 0.0. 0:.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs KCS2000: Un.ignalized I.Lezaectiona Release 4.1 TWO -MAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst. C_ �; J Michael AgencyarCfo Matthew J. Delich, P.E. _ Data Performed: 5/10/01 nesec Time Paziod ier Jurisdiction: imbe line/Gust r {� - Jurisdiciion: -F Collins Analysis Year: scot[ short bkgrd total _ _ -• - Project SD: 0134 East/West Street: .Custer North/South Street. Timberline Intersection Orientation:,NS Study period (hra ).: Vehicle Volumes and Adjustment. " Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound - Movement 1 2 3 J 4 5 6 L T a ;I L _ T R _ Volume l 1045 954 3 - Peak -Hour Factor, PHF a 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate. HFR 7 1100 1004 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- .. -- - Median Type TWLTL RT Ch... a"red? ._ Lanes 1 .1 %1 0 Configuration L T1 - TR Upstream Signal? ,,No. :. No Minor Street: Approach..... „ .,_We3tWgp0 ,.,.,Eazibound Movement 7 Br. , 9 ill ..10 11 - 12 L T' 'R - �1 �L T R Volume 2 .. 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Pate, HFR 2 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles ."'2 .2 Percent Grade (1) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 AT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB Ba Westbound Easibound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 it 12 Lane Config L I LA v ( 7 17 CP 680 468 v/ 0.01 0.04 95 length 0.03 0.11 Cony_ Delay 10.3 , 13.0 IDS B B Approach Delay - 13.0 Approach LOS - B 'section Performance Summary Appr/ 'Lane A .t Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Nate Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS LT 187 846 0.66 R 665 1583 0.50 Westbound LT 402 1826 0.39 R 522 1563 0.21 Northbound '- L 393 1710 0.71 TR 1154 1861 0.59 Southbound L 525 1770 0.05 T 987 1863 0.93 R 839 1583 0.27 Intersection Delay = 28.4 0.22 67.7 E 36.8 ,D 0.42 21.9 C 0.22 33.9 C 29.9 'C 0.33 24.3 C - 0.69 33.5 C ; 0.62 12.2 B 10.4 -- jB 5 0.61 8.2 A 0.53 38.0 D 32.7C 0.53 13.7 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C RCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80530 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am pm - - Intersection: Ti erline/Drake Area Type: .. All other areas Jurisdiction:- - Fo ollins Analysis Year. recen short bkgrtl total` Project ID: 0140 East/West Street r North/South .Street Drake Timberline RCS20DO: Unsignal ioed lnterevctions Release 4.1 TWO -NAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 11 Analyst:''' Michael Agency/Cc.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/10101 Analysis Time Period' Intersection: Ti erline/Custer Jurisdiction: F Collins ' Analysis Year: iecten short bkgrtl total Project ID: 0134 East/Meat Street: Custer North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hr.): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R 1 ..1 .. T. R Volume 14 90, 1189 8 Peak -Maur Factor, PHF 0.15 0.15 0.95 0.95 - Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 955 1250 e Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL '- HT Channelized? Lane. 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T : TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach westbountl Esstbound Movement 7 0 9 j 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 2 13 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rat., HFR 2 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (1) 0 _ 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 �. AT Channelized? :...... .. �. ..,, ._ ....: :. ......: •:�:... ..:.:- _..._..... ... _... _..:. Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level'. of Service Approach we S8 Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 19 1 10 11' 12 Lane Config L I I LR v tvPnr C(m1 (vph) 553 370 v/c 0.03 0.04 951 queue length 0.08 0.13 Control Delay 11.7 15.1 Los B C Approach Delay 15.1 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J- Delich •. ... .. .. - . . Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsrgnelized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich _ Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4. ilyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/. .pect :ncy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins :iod: a. Op Year eeent short bkgrtl total ,ject ID: 0140 I St: Prospect NIS St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 Lanes I 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 I 'onfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L T R I .=a 190 - 683 341 1294 860 70 1286 314 145 130 294 133 e Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 ,R Vol 1 0 1 0' 1 0 1. 0 'ation 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations as Combination 1 2 3 4.1 5 6 7 8 Left A - P. . I NB Left A A A Thru P - I Thru A A Right - P h.. Right A A Peds - - A I Peds g Left A A P I SB ..Left A A Thru - A P I Thru A Right i° A P I Right A Peds : _ X I Peds X Right I EB Right Right A I WE Right en 6.0 7.0 40.0 6.0 5.0 26.0 low j 0.0 - 0.0 03.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 Red' 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs RCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 lyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Drake ncy: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas e: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins iod: ® pm Year ecen short bkgrtl total ject ID: 0140 St: Drake NIS St: Timberline _ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L. T R I 1 1 Lanes I 0 1 1 I 0 I 1 1 1 3 0 I 3 1 1 I onfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L T R I ume 1232 67 335 12 51 63 1215 824 6 153 620 137 1 e Width I 12.0 12.0 1 12-0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 R vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ation 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations as Combination 1 2 .3 4 1 5 6 7 8 Left A I NB Left A A P. Thru A I Thru A P Right - A I Right A P _ Peds - X I Peds X Left A 1 58 Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X Right ,'I.EB_ Right A A Right I WE Right A an 32.0 6.0 6.0 46.0 lout 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 Red 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersect erformanee Summary' ' ' ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat .io3 Lane Group Approach . Lane Group Flow Rate - - Grp Capacity Is) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS - Eastbound L 364 1770 0.26 0.40 '15.3 B TR 1345 3362 O.BO 0.40 31.6 C 30.3 C W Satbountl L 357 1770 0.87 0.54 46.2 'D TR 1645 3500 0.61 0.47 20.3 C 26.4 C Northbound - L 340 1770 0.89 0.38 48.0 D TR 550 ,1774 0.88 0.31 48.0 D 48.0 D Southbound L 305 1770 0.10 0.34 23.5 C - T 484 - 1663 0.64 0.26 35.6 D 30:9'`C' R 586 1583 0.24 0.37 22.0 C - Intersection Delay 32.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOSC HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich - Matthew J. Delich; P.E. -- 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed:-11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: Titline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: ecen short bkgrtl total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street 'North/South Street Prospect Timberline •- Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (a) , v/c - g/C Delay LOS Delay; Rgspt Eastbound - LT 447 1396 0.75 0.32 37.5" = D--' 27-IF-IC _"_ R 776 1583 0.45 6.49 17.2 B Westbound - LT 590 1845 0.09 0.32 23.9 C 20.2. C R 681 1583 0.10 0.43 17.0 B Northbound L 369. 1770 0.61 0.59 19.3 B TR '967. 1860 r 0.90'. 0.52, 33.6 C 30.6 C Southbound _ L 305 1770 0.18 0.54 17.4 B T 857 1863 0.76 0.46 28.8 C 26.0 C R 720 1563 0.20 0.46 16.6 B Intersection Delay - 27.9 (sec/,eh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970)•669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com _. _. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: _ ... Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: op. Intersection: Timberline/Drake Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: ecen short bkgrd total _ Project ID: 0140 .. East/West Street North/South Street Drake Timberline Attachment "B" Transportation Impact Study Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet Orie e • Beet Res `, lest.- Ofc/Bus., Coat Ind -` 9ther,,' 'ect Site) c'-'- 1 ' S' ci "fv Rehrathm,'-a, Res dm2L - ^ cliorch; avrc)�+ Offnoe/Business. Othor(specify)'- e pcuoman Ucan"'nons wtmm u:u (n.> miles mr scnoms) os the pm)ec( boundary in the spaces above- The pedestrian Level of Service forthe facditylconidor linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity, types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interesdamenity, and security ofthe selected rowels). o Foist e."J,0S N. s SPRn04 2 /,� r6DEN FARM oo PAizK U t(LOSPECY EAST f�u5n4)E55 primer County Urban Are Strect Standards Janmry 2, 2001 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release.4.1 Analyst: Michael - Inter::-Timberline/Prospect Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E., Area type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 -- - - -- Jeri ad: --Fort-Edllins .i j �i : Period: pm , _ Yea: recent sport bY..grd total Project- ID: 0140-�- U.�r.'-_'+ Fa - E/W St: Prospect -� N/SZSt: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY: I Eastbound I Westbound --I Northbound' 1' So.thbou.d I I L T R I L -T * R ) L •`T- L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 1 ' 2 0 1 1 " 1 '0 I 1 1 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L T R I Volume 188 873 231 162 556 37 1205 333 237 132 541 98 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12-0 112.0 12.0 12.0 f RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 - -0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type:, All other areas signal Operations. Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 'S -6 7 8 EB Left �A P I NB Left A A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P I Right. A 'A Peds X I Peds X WB Left A P I SB Left A A Thru P I _Thru _ - _ A Right P I Right A ' Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right Green 6.0 40.0 6.0 4.0 34.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 Seca APPENDIX B Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/CC Delay LOS Delay LOS - L 349 1770 0.27 0.47 16.3 B TR 1371 3428 0.85 0.40 33.9 C 32.6 C - Westbound L 233 1770 0.28 0.47 20.3 C TR 1402 3506 0.45 0.40 22.9 C 22.7 C Northbound - L 305 1770 0.71 0.45 29.0 C TR 664 1747 0.90 0.38 45.1 0 40.0 D Southbound L 305 1770 0.11 0.42 19.8 B T 633 1863 0.90 0.34 47.2 D 41.3 D R 712 1583 0.14 0.45 16.3 B Intersection Delay 34.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C .. HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich - Matthew J- Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelichEfrii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed:. 11/17/00 _ Analysis Time Period: <9 pm Intersection: Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas . Jurisdiction: Foz Collins Analysis Year: :cent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0140 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline APPENDIX A Johnson Farm Summary of Multi -Use Trip Generation Average Weekday Driveway Volumes July 09, 2001 Attachment"A" Tmuspo"ation Impact Study Base Assumptions . Project- ProjectName boa so,) FAjzm Ro PGRTV project Location !/E Ceau R oP RAC TrnaeCL/VE TIS Assumptisns Type of Study Full: ri Ieactmediate: ,Un Study /vex Boundaries North: ?Fo SpGr South: CV$Tti (L Fist: EAST /ac<655 W'da: Twaseuut Study Yea. Short Range: 200.7 Long Range: 2020 Funve Traffic Growth Rate TAev .C. T2AU ORiA r,.,u Ay U,U4 Study Inte.eetions 1. All access drives F- 5. 2�¢ARG�i,n3e¢L/u� 6. 3.(? os PacT nISGC U+/G 7' 4.T,-,aree/wel(2u S rep_ 8. Time Period for Study M: 7:00-9:0 PM: J:OOd:OU Sat Noam Trip one'sRates nER f TC- Trip Adjm1racal Factors Passby: AOOT S,su,AICA.K Captive s•"0 /araRAN Market'V4 - �-"' Overall Trip Distribution yes ATr North South -u East West Mode Split Assumptions .. _ Cottanitted Roadway Improvements DR 99/71,.,aee4u6 7Z r,a secnoU UwoeR m Other Traffic Studies 9PR,Uo Caevr Al2a4 G.tgePou� Z,CG6U FAR.. (41A,Pc i Areas Requiring Special Study _ C✓r 70e-0aH TRAFRC ou SpARP W,.vr Date: jyJ y R, ZOO TraO'ie Engineer: 1'I A'r %EL l C N Loci[ Emily Engineer 20-25 24 Hour AM Pk Hour PH Pk Hour Two-way Land Use Size Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit FL - General Office Building 3 4 Th.Gr.Sq.Ft. 44 5 1 1 5 Single -Family Detached Housing 242 Dwelling Units 2316 46 136 157 87 -� Single Family Detached Housing - 226 Dwelling Units 2163 43 127 147 81 y Single Family Detached Housing 145 Dwelling Units 1388 28 81 94 52 E Residential Condominium / Townhouse F 385 Dwelling Units 2256 27 142 139 69 Single Family Detached Housing 193 Dwelling Units 1847 37 108 125 69 Single Family Detached Housing C168 Dwelling Units 1600 32 94 109 60 Specialty Retail Center - 6 T.G.L.A. 325 ' 9 12 15' !Z Total 11947 aer te.. 781 435 _ 233 701 Note: A zero indicate. no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY NICROTRANS 25-3o5 y Orb.n Arc. Street Smadards 2, 2001 u IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Johnson Farm Property development on the short range and long range street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: - The development of the Johnson Farm Property is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Johnson Farm Property will generate approximately 11,947 daily trip ends, 934 morning peak hour trip ends, and 1216 afternoon peak hour trip ends. -.•._.__-_Current- -.__operation at the key intersections is acceptable. Observation indicates that provision of additional northbound and eastbound lanes at the Timberline/Prospect intersection will reduce the length of the northbound queues that occur at this intersection:This geometry will also improve the operation of -- -this- intersection. Using' the short range ­'''`background traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants ;will be met at the Timberline/Custer intersection. Using -the'sYiort< range total traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants will be met at the Timberline/Access C intersection. - In. the. short._ range future, given development of the Johnson Farm " Property and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably, with the recommended geometry shown in Figure 11. In the-.' long ---- raq ie Iuture, given development of the Johnson Farm ,,Pro per;ty_:,_;;,the_key *intersections will operate acceptably during the 5. peak hours, except..for the northbound minor street leg during both peak hours at :the Drake/Access G/Iowa intersection. The long range geometry is 'shown in Figure 12. Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines_ 28 "activity center." The level of service determination assumes that future residential developments (namely, Spring Creek Farm and Rigden Farm) will build their streets and adjacent streets in accordance with Fort Collins Standards. This being the case, pedestrian facilities will exist where they currently do not. This is a reasonable assumption. If this does not occur or is not accepted by the City, then acceptable. pedestrian level of service cannot be achieved. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix H. The minimum level of service for "activity center" is B for all categories. With the assumed future pedestrian facilities along future streets, the pedestrian level of service will be acceptable. Bicycle Level of Service Appendix H shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Johnson Farm Property. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there is one destination area within 1320 feet of.the-.Johnson Farm Property. This is the "activity center" indicated on __the.Fbrt Collins Pedestrian Plan, located in the area of the Timberline/Drake intersection. This "activity center" will likely be within the Rigden Farm development. A bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix H. Transit Level of Service Currently, this area is served by Route 10. The Fort Collins 2015 Transit System Map shows that Timberline Road will be a high frequency transit corridor with 20 minute -service... Drake Road will be'-,: served by feeder route service at: 30 minute headways: ";Transit `'leve., xz `. of service will be at B. Most of the Johnson Farm Property will within 1320 feet of a high frequency or feeder transit" route in future. - t; 27 DAILY TRAFFIC FORECAST FOR INTERNAL STREETS 9 Figure 13 26 I 0 Interior Street Classification The City of Fort Collins classifies streets based upon a daily traffic volume. In the case of development proposals, interior streets are classified based upon a traffic forecast. The Johnson Farm Property is being submitted as a Conceptual ODP and, as such, a detailed street network is not included. However, a basic street network has been developed. The primary streets are shown in Figure 13 with the daily volume forecasts at a number of locations. Also shown on Figure 13 are the daily traffic forecasts at the remaining accesses to the Johnson Farm Property. These forecasts are generally less than 1000 vehicles per day (vpd), which indicates that they would be considered to be local streets.(less than 1000 vpd). From this, it can easily be deduced that interior streets would -have less than---1000 vpd and would, therefore, be classified as local streets. A short segment of the access labeled as Access G will have volumes that are forecasted at being just over 1000 vpd. As such, .according .to the Fort Collins Street Standards, this -short segment_should.be,classi_fied as a connector local street. However, this volume (>1000 vpd) will _. only exist for a short segment of ..this street'. It is, therefore, recommended that this short segment be classified as a local street,, rather than have street classifications change because of-' small deviations from the street standards. The difference between a residential local street and a connector local street is 6 feet of pavement. .Thera are two streets that will go through the Johnson Farm Property that will have traffic volumes that will be in the range of collector streets. As the streetsproceed through the property ,,. -the. volumes will decrease to those of.a connector local street in 'the -easts'Y_:.: portion of the Johnson Farm Property. However, stree"t-, systems' continuity is important to consider. In light -of •thiss recommended that the street that enters the Johnson Farm Property`�at` Access C be classified as a minor collector street with appropriate cross section modifications in the segment just east of Timberline Road. It is also recommended that the north/south street that enters the Johnson Farm Property at Access H be classified as a .minor collector street and that it continue to be classified as a minor collector street to its connection with Sharp Point Drive, regardless of whether the traffic forecasts show a lower classification. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix H shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Johnson Farm Property. There will be four pedestrian destinations within 1320 feet of the Johnson Farm Property. These are: 1) Fort Collins High School (1 mile for schools), 2) the future residential/commercial area west of the site (Spring Creek Farm), 3) the residential/commercial area south of the site (Rigden Farm), and 4) the commercial area north of the site (Prospect East Business Park) . This site is in an area type termed "school walking area" and 25 Access D Access E It u p Q Drake Custer v 0 m 3 0 LONG RANGE (2020) GEOMETRY :. in N U U El .-a - Denotes Lane Figure 12 24 TABLE 6 Long Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersectron } $ Y `xf -y` > Y �oveim Level of Service .,, - PM Timberline/Prospect (signal) EB D C WB C ENB D D SB D E OVERALL D D Timberline/Access A (RT-in/RT-out) WB RT C C Timberline/Access B (RT-in/RT-out) WB RT C C-:--- =- Timberline/Access C (signal) EB C C WB C C NB D C SB B OVERALL C C Timberline/Access D (RT-in/RT-out/LT-in) EB RT B C WB RT C C NB LT B C SB LT C C Timberline/Access E (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT. B C WB RT C C Timberline/Drake (signal) EB D D WB D 3 DNB D 'D }' SB C OVERALL D :: D- Timberline/Custer (signal) EB C C WB C DNB C C SB C D OVERALL C D Drake/Access F (RT-in/RT-out) SB RT A A Drake/Access G/Iowa (stop sign) NB LT/T F F - NB RT B B NB APPROACH F F SB LT/T D F SB RT B B SB APPROACH C D EB LT A A WB LT A A Drake/Access H (stop sign) I SB LT/RT B C EB LT A A 23 —�--Access'D 1 � Access­E LL U N N N U U zo DrZ T `.," SHORT RANGE (2007) GEOMETRY 6-0 N N N U U - Denotes Lane Figure 11 22 TABLE 5 Short Range (2007) Total Peak Hour Operation Level ....... Timberline/Prospect (signal) EB C C WB C D NB C C S8 D D OVERALL C D Timberline/Access A (RT-in/RT-out) WB RT C B Timberline/Access B (RT-in/RT-out) WB RT C Timberline/Access C (signal) .EB C C WB C NB C SB B C, OVERALL C C Timberline/Access D (RT-in/RT-out/LT-in) EB RT B C WB RT C B NB LT B C SB LT C B Timberline/Access E (RT-in/RT-out) EB RT B C WB RT C B Timberline/Drake (signal) EB D D WB D NB C 'C SB C D OVERALL C D Timberline/Custer (signal) EB C C WB C C NB B B SB B C OVERALL B B Drake/Access F (RT-in/RT-out) SB RT A A Drake/Access G (stop sign) SB LT B C SB RT B B SB APPROACH B B EB LT A A Drake/Access H (stop sign) SB LT/RT B B EB LT A A PAII TABLE 4 Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation qc W,�f - V* fiCi,; Level�.Oserv�� Timberline/Prospect (signal) EB C C WB C D NB C D SB C D OVERALL C D Timberline/Access C--,-,L_.�,i,, ,(signal) EB C C NB B B SB B C OVERALL B B Timberline/Access D (RT-in/RT-out/LT-in) EB RT B C NB LT B C, Timberline/Access E � :-i kfRTI AnIRTI -VUUL 1 -111) EB RT B C Timberiine/Drake (signal) EB C D WB D D NB D D SB C C OVERALL C D Timberline/Custer (signal) EB C C WB C D NB C C SB B C OVERALL C C Drake/Access G/lowa (stop sign) NB LT/RT B C WB LT A A 10 TABLE 3 Short Range (2007) Background Peak Hour Operation ( „iks ` f } f I�ersectiOn j vemen Timberline/Prospect (signal) EB C j C WB C ;` D NB C LC SB C D OVERALL C C Timberline/Access C (stop sign) EB LT F. F _ EB RT B C EB APPROACH E E NB LT B B Timberline/Access C (signal) EB C C NB B B SB B C OVERALL B B Timberline/Access D (RT-in/RT-out/LT-in) EB RT B `C NB LT B C Timberline/Access E (RT-in/RT-out/LT-in) EB RT B B Timberline/Drake (signal) EB D WB D D NB C C SB C C OVERALL C C Timberline/Custer (signal) EB C C WB C C NB B B SB B B OVERALL B B 19 0 0� in b'1660/110 f 630/1310 I I J i l 1051465 /— Prospect 125/130 130511020 —► b o c 3551690 a e C N O N P � vNi Access A (O P b N O O N �-- 70145 mb Access B O f0 P N N N r N ry s 65160... "O �—NOM 190/140:r - � ' 2 � 751eo_ r Access C' O ^� b O p N Q O ^ O N �50/30 4020 --� 1 ,! Access D . _ N H -N OWN' Y_�1�i•L�:-'-J_ _.. 40/20 3520 --- `Acces''-.E m LL U S b b N N N o m m Q Q Q o c o e zzo/23o a o s s a 3001340 - 535/675 `I �' L 2020 J i l 175I105 J"' r 30/GO J �— 300555 \\\ �— 635/725 A 12 \\\ Drake 4201320 10140 100/125 2901400 —� o N 545/740 y m o 0 405/400 —� 505/595 h �' 10li5 .- 0 0 b V N m O r .- � b N ry 2351360 0 - �— 1 arm 155260 --a— AM/PM Custer s/s r Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles 15rz0 15/15 b m � b LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL Figure 10 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 38 0 0L� a � 45/80 J i l 640/1010 85/425 \\\ /- 951100 Prospect 10o56e5 —� N o 330/670 Q N Ol Y1 Q ul Q �3020 1 I Access A oIn N Q N N NO � L 70145 Access B O N Q OO N N r n a o � e � 85/60 NOM 190/140 ' 1 1 } AcceSS C NOM NOM � NI N N 30190 p Q �2 o O Q h O_ O N � l' N 50130 40120 N 1 / Access D I I v ` N N O C m m O N O N � N m � � \-4020 35120 - 1 Access E 0 0 1L U m N V1 U1 U U O U U p O Q N Q Q N ai 180/190 0 n u0i umi 290295 130/105 O _ /// 540/585 �— 490560 Drake 370290\\\ r 10/40 150245 y 4351350 0 n O N t00 r 3051450 —� n Q m O •- n2 c 110/85 —NOM - 160/1/05 Custer 515 ` 140M 15/15 o it 0 n m m m SHORT RANGE (2007) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC I& N 2 N U U Q O � O m N ` — 2020 f 190/325 100/125 200/170 —� --a— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Figure 9 1.7 site generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 9 shows the total (site. plus background) short range peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Figure 10 shows the total long range morning and afternoon peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Using the short range background traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants will be met at the Timberline/Custer intersection. Using the short range total traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants will be met at the Timberline/Access C, intersection. Signal warrant analyses are provided in Appendix C. Operation Analysis Capacity analyses ,,Were performed at the key intersections. The operations analyses were -conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year'2007 condition. The long range analysis reflects a year 2020 condition. The.,,intersection geometry used in the various analyses is that needed to achieve acceptable operation in the respective short range and long range futures. Usingthe traffic Volumes shown in Figure 6, the key intersections operate in the short range background condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation, forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will ,operate acceptably during the peak hours, except - for the minor street "left -'turns at the Timberline/Access C intersection with stop sign control`, which 'will operate at level of service F. With gs L ^- signalization, this intersection will operate acceptably. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7, the key intersections operate in the long range background condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9 and the recommended geometrics, the key intersections operate in, the short range total condition as indicated in Table 5. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably. The short range geometry is shown in Figure 11. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 10, the key intersections operate in the long range total condition as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix G. The key intersections will operate acceptably, except for the northbound minor street leg during 'both peak hours at the Drake/Access G/Iowa intersection. The long range geometry is shown in Figure 12. 1.6 0 I& m N 511178 1 Prospect Oe� o � Lpv N 0 1.1 N �2720 fAccess r A N N Y � N O � N ry 66/43 OI Access B N N Q m m N �n 85/60 . 1871130 _ .. .. ,.... r Access C n J Access E IN o lL U 2 NN tv N y N N UI N a a �16111 mmN w nQ �N -- 104/61 94/Ss `-- 1/1 `--- t/A )I ` `--- 5/13 / �— 156199 \ �—104170 0 �— 2/6 Drake 431140 8140 - 35/119 - 20777 --� 351119 —� n N 6/2 y M N � > n Ol p — I Custer AM/PM c M SITE GENERATED Figure 8 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 15 0 oa 60/110 � 63011310 1251505 /— Prospect 1251130\\ 1305/1020 I I 3051510 --- �r O O N N ri r n N v N N N � Access C 7s/e0 - 1� ... 30/90 > N o o h N N N h Access D - _ 40/20 \ O m. ui o Access E O N a N m v o r N 220225 l 1801250 70/100 / 1 \\ Drake 405n80 240/320 —► o o 0 505/595 o o b o a m � N N N N ry 235/360 v' �— 1025 r-155260 Custer 5/5 } . 1520 —► N N N 15115 o C f O N N � N LONG RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC �— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles c9 N --420550 30160 Q 4051545— 10/35 --` ` N O N � m 0 I\ hd Figure 7 14 m h 45180 64011010 1 t 105/465 \\\ /-- Prospect 955//100 1005/785 I 280/490 0 e O O N N N P Np V N � QO N O1 J� Access C 75/80 30190 YI m N m m �n m P O N O � m o o` m � o Access D 4020 O N � N O J� Access E 3520 0 N O h � N Q � 180/185 170206 2520 Drake 3551150 1 1301165 435/350 C C o O N N y N P m o O _mo 110/85 J1160/105 'NOM Custer 5I5 f r NOM -� N o 15175 o o fay r N SHORT RANGE (2007) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N -- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Figure 6 13 Pro: Dr TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 5 12 TABLE 2 Trip Generation WD*,MT Parcel A 710 Office 4.0 KSF 11.01 1 44 1.37 5 0.19 1 J,OE 1 . 1.24 5..:, Parcel B 210 Single Family 242 D.U. 9.57 1 2316 0.19 46 10.56 1 136 10.6511 157 10.36 1 --87 Parcel C 210 Single Family 226 D.U. 9.57 2163 0.19 43 0.56 127 0.65 147 0.36 81 814 Specialty Retail 8.0 KSF 40.67 325 1.92 15 1.44 12 3.08 25 3.33 27 Subtotal 2488 584 139 - 172 108 Parcel D 210 Single Family 145 D.U. 9.57 1 1388 0.19 28 0.56 81. 0.65 -94 0.36 52 Parcel E 230 Townhome 385 D.U. 5.86 1 2256 0.07 27 0.37 142 0.36 139 018 6.9 Parcel F 210 Single Family 193 D.U. 9.57 1 1847 0.19 37 0.56 108 0.65T-125 0.36 69 Parcel G 210 Single Family 168 D.U. 9.57 1608 0.19 32 0.56 94 0.65 109 0.36 60 Total 11,947 233 701 781 435_ 11 I m 0 m c 0 .n U NO SCALE SITE PLAN 10 Figure 4 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Johnson Farm Property is, primarily a residential development .(with a small portion allocated to office and retail land uses), located in the northeast quadrant of the Timberline/Drake intersection in Fort Collins. Figure 4 shows a site plan of the Johnson Farm Property. The short range analysis (Year 2007) includes development of the Johnson Farm Property and an appropriate increase in background traffic, due to normal growth and other potential developments in the area. The long range analysis year is considered to be 2020. The site plan shows the Johnson Farm Property indicating the primary accesses to the arterial streets and the collector streets within the Johnson Farm Property. The. accesses are given letter designations. The control and allowed movements at each access are: A - stop sign with right-in/right-out movements; B - stop sign with right-in/right-out movements; C -- signal with full movements; D - stop sign with right-in/right-out/left-in movements; E - stop sign with right-in/right-out movements; F - stop sign with right-in/right-out. movements; G - stop sign with full. movements; and H:-.._stop sign with full movements. Trip Generation `. Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A' compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, . 6th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Johnson Farm Property. Future year data was obtained from the NFRRTP and other traffic studies. Figure 5 shows the trip distribution used for the Johnson Farm Property. Background Traffic Projections Figures 6 and 7 show the respective short range and long range background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range and long range future horizons were obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP and various traffic studies prepared for this area of Fort Collins. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 8 shows the 9 Right -turn lane improvements are generally considered to be relatively easy to implement. However, due to the Timberline bridge and other physical constraints, these lanes are not practical without an overall improvement to this intersection. This level of improvement will likely be undertaken by the City as a capital improvement project with contribution from land developments that impact this intersection. Pedestrian Facilities There are pedestrian facilities along the west side of Timberline Road, south of Drake Road. However, these are beyond 1320 feet from the Johnson Farm Property site. There are no sidewalks on the east side of Timberline Road., However, these sidewalks will be constructed with the development of the First Assembly of God Church and Rigden Farm. There are currently no sidewalks along Drake Road. However, when these roads are built to arterial standards, sidewalks will be included in the respective. cross sections. Sidewalks are/will be incorporated within this -development. Bicycle Facilities Bicycle Lanes will be included within the cross section of Prospect Road, Drake Road, and Timberline Road, per Fort Collins standards. Other streets that require bike lanes are beyond 1320 feet f rnm tha Jnhncnn F'a rm Prnno rtv cite __.._.. Fa_... __.,r._rt ..i t... Transit. Facilities Transfort, currently .,serves; -,.,this 10. Route 10 provides .=.50..':minute Timberline/Drake intersection"-:r area of Fort Collins with Route service with a stop near the 8 TABLE I Current Peak Hour Operation EB C C WB C C Timberline/Prospect (signal) NB D SB D C OVERALL C C EB D WB -C C C Timberline/Drake NB C B (signal) SB C C OVERALL-- c C Timberline/Custer EB LURT B C (stop sign) NB LT g B 7 N (, � n N o 37no m �— 556/880 62rzs4 Prospect 88/90 873/683 231 /341 m IT LO 0 co M N f7 N in M N th 63/104 Drake 232/1M f 87/19 —� o 3351314 N � � N (p N aD m �Il! f(I7 I AM/PM Custer zn 15/13 -T co 0 � rn ADJUSTED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 6 V N O Cl) W Q m CA o 37170 (41 no) ° "' "' -�- 556/880 (730/933) 621294 (2071413) (83/114) 88M — Prospect (7571695) 873/683 —.- v n (282r342) 231/341 M o M m C] f7 N � N C7 N N N m to 63/104 '. t'I N`m f7 `O " --51/139' 2/9 Drake 232/133 ___/ 87/19 — 335/314 �n o in N m N V N N aD rn� co Go com1 1 Custer 22 15/13 N O 4— AM/PM N RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 5 Figure 2 Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic counts at the key existing intersections are shown in Figure 2. The traffic data for the Timberline/Prospect and Timberline/Drake intersections was collected in July 2000, and the traffic data for the Timberline/Custer intersection was collected in November 1998. The Timberline/Drake and Timberline/Prospect counts were taken from the "Spring Creek Farm TIS," August 2000. Values in parentheses at the Timberline/Prospect intersection reflect counts obtained by the City in October 2000. Review of this data indicates abnormalities for some movements, probably caused by construction/detours at other intersections. Therefore, the counts from the "Spring Creek Farm TIS" were used. New traffic counts were not obtained at the Timberline/Drake intersection due to the current construction along Timberline Road and Drake Road. Since the turning movements at.the Timberline/Custer intersection are not likely to have changed to/from the west leg of Custer Drive, an updated count was not performed at this intersection. The only changes at this intersection would be related to through -traffic on Timberline Road and construction=.related traffic.:on-the east leg of Custer Drive. Through traffic volumes on Timberline Road were adjusted to reflect a year 2000 condition and are shown"ir'i' Figure 3. Existing Operation The counted intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure "_3i-.the peak hour --operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation _forms are-.-Provided-in Appendix B."., A -description of _level of service for signalized:and ,unsignalized-inte.-,sections from the 2000 Highway Capacity -Manual is ":also: - pro vided.,,.�in:-'Appendix B. The key intersections operate acceptably- overall during -both -.:.the morning and afternoon peak hours. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service E or better in a mixed use district. At unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at level of service F for any approach leg for an arterial/local intersection. While the analyses show that acceptable operation occurs at the Timberline/Prospect intersection, observation indicates otherwise. During the peak hours, the northbound queue routinely backs up to/through the Timberline/Midpoint intersection. This intersection allows for right-in/right-out movements. It is approximately 500 feet south of Prospect Road. This length of queue indicates that there is currently inadequate geometry northbound on Timberline Road at Prospect Road. In addition to this, there is a high (>200 vph) eastbound right - turn volume on Prospect Road during the peak hours. Provision of both a northbound right -turn lane and an eastbound right -turn lane would greatly improve the operation of the Timberline/Prospect intersection. FORT Ns coNTO DOWNTOWN AIRPARK m N Prospect Road o Liza (D .0 oQTy�Rv > Drake Road:.:: Johnson Farm SCALE: 1"=2000' SITE LOCATION 3 Figure 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Johnson Farm Property is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily either vacant (agriculture) or residential. A residential development (Rigden Farm) is under construction to the south of the site. The Spring Creek Farm mixed -use development is currently going through the land development approval process in Fort Collins. Land adjacent to the site is flat (<2% grade) from a traffic, operations perspective. The center of Fort Collins lies to the west of the proposed Johnson. Farm Property. The Timberline Road corridor, according to the City of Fort Collins Structure Plan, will have a mixture of land ..uses, including employment, residential, industrial and-' commercial. As such, it is considered to be a "Mixed Use District-:': Roads The primary streets near the Johnson Farm Property site are Timberline Road., Drake Road, and Prospect Road. Timberline Road is to the west of the Johnson Farm Property site. it -S claSSrfied as a six - lane arterial beyond the year .2015 on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently,,. Timberline Road has a two-lane cross section near the Johnson Farm .Property --site. At -Drake Road, Timberline Road has one travel lane":in each direction.,_ left -turn lanes, a southbound right -turn lane, and limited bike facilit.es.;,'11The .existing speed limit in this area is' 40 mph. .-.The Timberline/.Drake intersection is currently under construction to improve the intersection. Drake Road is south of the Johnson Farm Property site. It is an east -west street designated as a four -lane arterial west of Timberline Road and a two-lane arterial east of Timberline Road on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a two-lane, cross section adjacent to the site. At Timberline Road, Drake Road has two travel lanes, right -turn lanes, and limited bike facilities. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph. The Timberline/Drake intersection has signal control. As mentioned above, this intersection is being improved. Prospect Road is north of the Johnson Farm Property site. It is an east -west street designated as a four -lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a four -lane cross section in the area of the site. At Timberline Road, Prospect Road has two travel lanes in each direction, left -turn lanes, and limited bike facilities. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph. The Timberline/Prospect intersection has signal control. 2 I. INTRODUCTION This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development of the Johnson Farm Property. The proposed Johnson Farm Property is located in the northeast quadrant of the Timberline/Drake intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultant (Downing/Thorpe/James), the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff, the Fort Collins Transportation Planning staff, and the Fort Collins Current Planning staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines. A Base Assumptions Form and related information are provided in Appendix A. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip,assignment;• - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic 5 3. Adjusted Recent Peak Hour Traffic .................... 6 4. Site Plan ............................................ 10 5. Trip Distribution. ...................................... 12 6. Short Range (2007) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 13 7. Long Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Traffic ....... 14 8. Site. Generated Peak.,,Houra'Traffic ..................... 15 9. Short.Range (2007) Total,'P.eak Hour Traffic ........... 17 10. Long Range (2020)' Total Peak Hour Traffic ............ 18 11. Short Range (2007) Geometry .......................... 22 12. Long Range (2020) Geometry ........................... 24 13. Daily.. Traffic Forecast,formInternal Streets 26 r, APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions C Signal Warrants D Short Range Background Traffic Operation E Long Range Background Traffic Operation F Short Range Total Traffic Operation G Long Range Total Traffic Operation H Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Roads................................................ 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 4 Existing Operation ................................... 4 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 8 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 8 Transit Facilities ................................... 8 III. Proposed Development ........ :........................ 9 Trip Generation ..................................... 9. Trip Distribution ......................................... 9 Background Traffic Projections ........................ 9 Trip Assignment ...................................... .9 SignalWarrants ...................................... 16 Operation Analysis ................................... 16 Interior Street Classifications ...................... 25 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 25 Bicycle Level of Service ................................ 27 Transit Level of Service ............................. 27 IV. Conclusions LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 7 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 11 3. Short Range (2007) Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 19 4. Long Range (2020) Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 20 5. Short Range (2007) Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 21 6. Long Range (2020) Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 23 THE JOHNSON FARM PROPERTY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO J U LY 2001 ,F Prepared for: s; The,James Company '2919-Valmont Road, Suite 204 'Boalder, CO 80301 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 PPOp RE(.,�ST O:'�WJ.D•F ;� 15263� 2. Schools: • Concerns for school overloading and busing distances required for elementary school kids to get to Laurel Elementary School. • Is School District and City talking about new growth areas? When will boundaries change? 3. Farmsteads: • Historic Fort Collins Development Corporation had several representatives concerned with the presentation of the farmsteads. 4. Rail System: • At one point in time, a rail line may be commuter rail and we should think ahead for possible . stations. vi. Name of the project as well as any previous name(s) the project may have been known by The final project name has not yet been determined. The only name we know of is Johnson Property. vii. A narrative description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated. The project has two distinct issues when it comes to conflicting Land uses. We have attempted to address each one with a site specific solution. 1. The first issue is that of the Historic Preservation Department wishes for preservatiow6f the - Farmsteads and how this relates to the surrounding uses. In both cases we have;provided a,, - - "Farmstead Buffer Zone" of a minimum of 200' around each farmstead. This buffer zone will be enforced through restrictive covenants and conditions that will be enforced by either the.city or the HOA. This will limit the use allowed in these areas as well as prevent any removal or modification of the existing structures unless otherwise approved by the City. As this specific use relates poorly to other typical industrial uses, we have chosen to eliminate the remainder of the Industrial zoning adjacent to the Jessup farm, and instead place lower residential uses -adjacent, which we feel is more compatible with the rural residential character of the farmsteads. We feel that the railroad line and the six lane Timberline Road are logical and significant barriers to use as land use transitions. To the south, adjacent to the Johnson Farm Buffer, we have placed a large natural open space and very low density residential. This way the rural residential character of the Farmstead is not affected by higher density uses. Again, we feel that these are both compatible uses given the nature of the farmsteads. 2. The second area we feel is a potential land use conflict is the relationship between the Industrial uses, the wastewater treatment plant, and the Structure Plan recommended Urban Estates. We feel that the adjacent Uses are not desirable uses for the largest lots in the project to abut. As we are required to place a certain amount of very low density housing in this area we have used several techniques to mitigate these different uses. First we have reconfigured the shape of the urban estates zoning area to have some of it away from the edge of the property. We have also configured the detention pond to extend further to the north along the tracks to act as a buffer. Additionally, we have coordinated with the wastewater facility and will provide a linear buffer (composed of berming, fencing, and landscape) adjacent to the treatment plant, to screen and separate these uses. 16 Wastewater Treatment Buffer: We have coordinated with Steve Comstock at the Drake Wastewater Treatment Plant to allow for a buffer between the proposed residential and the water treatment plant. The buffer will consist of a combination of Fencing, berming, and landscape. In addition we plan to extend the detention area as far north as possible to increase the width of the effective buffer. iii. Estimate of number of employees for commercial and industrial uses. The small Industrial area at the Jessup Farm area will be limited to one office (Vet, Child care, Photography Studio, etc.) and will have approximately 5-15 employees depending on the specific use. The small proposed retail within the LMN Zone will contain up to 8,000 s.f. of retail space and employ up to 15 to 20 people. iv. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant. The primary assumptions for decisions and choices made by the applicant and the applicant's team have been based on the following: 1.-Compliance:with the'City Plan key policies and principles. 2. Site specific information gathered in the initial inventory and planning process. 3. Input from Neighborhood Meetings: 4. Current market trends for more affordable urban housing. 5. Input form the City Planning Department -staff as well as other departments. v. .Written narrative. addressing each concern/issue raised at the neighborhood m_ ee_ tin05M f a,meeting.was held., The Johnson Property. Neighborhood meetin"g `w s held at 7 p.m. on Monday the 16`h of July at the Fort Collins High School. The major concernsfissues were as follows: 1. Traffic: • Increased traffic on Timberline and when will the improvement occur to widen to four (4) lanes from Drake to Prospect. • Concerns with increased traffic visiting the Edora Park area. What traffic calming elements can the City enforce? • How many new residents are expected in this area (Spring Creek, Rigden Farms, Johnson Property) and what forecasting for infrastructure has the City prepared? • Concerned with safe pedestrian intersection crossings at Timberline and Drake. A pedestrian underpass was suggested. • Could the Stuart Street connection be re -opened for discussion? (to reduce traffic through the Parkside East neighborhood). 15 ii. Description of proposed and existing open space, buffering, landscaping, circulation, transition areas, wetlands and natural areas. The proposed open space within the Johnson Property will consist of several different types. The following is a brief summary of the types and character of each of them. City Park (Public): The ±10 ac central park will be dedicated to the city for use as a neighborhood park. The character and landscape will be determined by the city but hopefully it will stay in keeping with the formal street landscape that we envision for the neighborhood, and then will transition to a natural landscape where the natural slope bank begins. We will meet with the park planners to give some input on our vision for this neighborhood park. This park will be used by both Johnson Property residents and surrounding community residents as well. Private (HOA) Parks: — There will be two types of parks that will be owned and maintained by the HOA" The larger parks, or sub -neighborhood parks, and the smaller pocket parks will have differing characteristics. The sub -neighborhood parks will be larger (t1 ac) active spaces, with formal street perimeter landscaping, significant open areas of maintained turf to provide active play space, and limited focal points, such as gazebos, play structures, or benches. These parks are to serve resident within each sub -neighborhood. The smaller pocket parks will be for passive recreation, and will have limited turf areas with landscape to provide interest as well as privacy. These parks will occur throughout the project on a limited basis. Natural Open Space: There will be a significant natural open space running from the project core to the Johnson Farm area to the South. This area will be reshaped to repair the man made damage to the Valley Wall, and maintained as a native short grass open space. Any new landscape will be native or appropriate species for this type of environment. Irrigation and mowing will be done only as necessary to promote establishment and proper health. A narrow "soft" trail may run within the open space to rriake'a-= connection from the central core/park to the south. There will be several detention areas with the primary pond to the south east being "wet' and the remaining ponds having intermittent water. The primary pond, as it is located in the lower density area will have a more naturalized feel, with organic planting forms, and a potential small path network. The smaller ponds, located closer to the higher density areas will have a more formal feel to relate to the surrounding buildings and streetscape. Perimeter Treatments: All perimeter streetscapes will be landscaped according to the City of fort Collins code, with formal tree patterns, evergreen screening where appropriate, and shrubs and perennials for accents. Where the project abuts less formal areas the landscape will be more organic, responding to site specific needs for interest and screening. Internal Streetscape: The primary streetscape will consist of formal tree placements, with even spacing, and different species occurring on different streets. Roundabouts, medians, and islands will all reflect the same formal character. Wetlands: The wetlands on site will be mitigated in southeast corner of the site, near the wet detention area, and will be planted with native wetland species. 14 This active zone will be fully accessed by auto, pedestrians, and bicyclists, as well as transit connections along Timberline. The main street concept shall have a central linear park element to provide an outdoor space as well as a visual focal point. New Medium Density Mixed -Use Neighborhoods (MMN) PRINCIPLE MMN-1: Housing in new Medium Density Mixed -Use Neighborhoods will have an overall minimum average density of 12 dwelling units per acre, achieved with a mix of housing types. Policy MMN-1.1, 1.2 The Johnson Property CDP has been designed to meet the requirements outlined in the MMN Section of the Development Code. The neighborhood(s) will include 3 to 4 housing types from single-family, townhomes, and entry level apartments. PRINCIPLE MMN 2 The layout and design -of a Medium Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood will form a transition and a link between surrounding neighborhoods and the Neighborhood Commercial Center or Community Commercial District. Policy MMN-2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6- The MMN 1 District.is`envisioned to be a higher density/compact sub -neighborhood at the Timberline and Drake intersection. This sub -neighborhood will be within walking distance of the Rigden Farms Commercial Center as•well as'the small:retait•corner;to-the north. The MMN will consist of a combination of higher density attached housing types interspersed with single- family housing. A strong linear open space element will connect the Timberline and Drake intersection to a central pocket park.and provide a special open -space feature for homes to front onto. Each of the blocks or street patterns within the MMN area will focus on this open space amenity for auto, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Industrial Districts (ID) PRINCIPLE ID-1: Industrial Districts wilbprovide?places: for a wide range of industrial and commercial uses that do not nee.d•:or-are°not suited to-highYpubliec,visibility. Policy ID- 1.1, 1.3 The Industrial District within the Johnson Property is placed over the Jessup Farmstead in hopes of preserving the existing site as a office village; such as a law office, architectural office, veterinarian clinic, etc. We will place very specific limited uses on this -zone as well as coordinate with the Historic Preservation Department to try and satisfy each party. There will be a 200' buffer from the red house and we will preserve all major trees around the farmstead: 13 Policy AN-5.3 Street Vistas. If possible, the view down a street should be designed to terminate in a visually interesting feature, and not terminate directly in a garage door. Our architectural design intent is to improve the overall streetscene through de-emphasizing the garage along the front elevation. We will have a variety of garage placements depending on the housing types including rear -loaded housing types. Through interconnected street patterns, our goal is to reduce long street lengths of repeating architectural forms and introduce changes in the architectural massing and housing types as well as street orientation focusing on park or open space elements. New Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhoods (LMN) PRINCIPLE LMN-1: Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhoods will have an overall minimum average density of five (5) dwelling units per acre, achieved with a mix of housing types. Policy LMN-1.1 Calculating the Density. In calculating the overall average density of a residential project, areas which are undevelopable will be excluded from the density calculation. Undevelopable areas means those areas of a project which are to be publicly owned and/or dedicated, and/or not available for development (such as major street rights -of -way, various open lands, areas of geological hazard, alleys, natural areas and water bodies). It, - Policy LMN-1.2 Mix of Housing Types and Lot Sizes. Builders and developers are encouraged to use their ingenuity to combine and distribute a variety of housing types to make an attractive, marketable neighborhood with housing for a diversity of people. At least two (2) housing types shall be included in any residential project containing more than 30 acres. As the acreage of the residential project increases, so shall the number of housing types increase. This can be achieved in various ways, with a variety of housing types, including the following: • Standard lot single-family houses (lots over 6,000 square feet) --0 Small lot single-family houses (lots 6.000 square feet, or less) • Duplex houses • Townhouses (attached housing) • Accessory dwelling units • Group homes • Multi -family housing (provided they are compatible in scale, and character with other dwellings in the proposed neighborhood, and limited to a maximum of four to eight dwelling units in a building) • Manufactured housing and mobile homes - The Johnson Property ODP has been designed to meet the requirement outlines in the LMN Section of the Land Development Code. The neighborhood/plan will include 3 to 4 housing types from entry level single-family, townhomes, to single-family move -up and up -scale townhomes, as well as a neighborhood recreation center and small retail center. PRINCIPLE LMN-2: The size, layout and design of a Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood should make it conducive to walking, with all the dwellings sharing the street and sidewalk system and a Neighborhood Center. Policy LMN-2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.8, and 2.9 Each sub -neighborhood will consist of 2 to 3 housing types and focus on a small pocket park or neighborhood park. The overall neighborhood has a heart or core that wraps around the neighborhood park and main street element. The neighborhood center consists of a mix of higher density minimal retail anchor and a neighborhood recreation center at the other end. 12 PRINCIPLE AN-4: Design policies for residential buildings are intended to emphasize creativity, diversity, and individuality. The following design policies are based on the premise that truly creative design is responsive to its context and the expressed preferences of citizens, and contributes to a comfortable, interesting community. Policy AN-4.1 Multiple -Family Housing Characteristics. All multiple -family buildings should be designed to reflect, to the extend possible, the characteristics and amenities typically associated with single-family detached housing. These characteristics and amenities include orientation of the front door to a neighborhood sidewalk and street, individual identity, private outdoor space, adequate parking and storage, access to sunlight, privacy, and security. Policy AN-4.2 Multiple -Family Building Variation. Multiple -building projects should offer variation among individual buildings, yet stay within a coordinated overall "design theme" Variation among buildings should be achieved by a combination of different footprints, facade treatments, roof forms, entrance features, and in specialized cases, building orientation. Monotonous complexes of identical buildings shall be discouraged, although there maybe ways to achieve visual interest among substantially identical buildings with a high degree of articulation on each building, combined with variation on massing on the site. Policy AN-4.3 Single -Family Housing Characteristics. Variation in house models in large developments should be encouraged, to avoid a monotonous streetscape, and eliminate the appearance of a standardized subdivision. Our architectural vision f6r* ie Johnson Property%Neighborhood focuses on providing variety as well as appropriate scale and.texture along the streetscene` The human scale elements are important to all types of housing from multi -family to single-family with appropriate entry elements that greet the street versus overpowers the street with large out -of -scale farms. Other important elements to always consider are walk and entry layout, three-dimensional streetscene layout, and porch and private patio spaces. We're planning on crating variety (avoiding large areas of monotonous building forms) through a mix of multi -family and single-family housing types parcel in small clusters throughout the neighborhood. For multi -family residence -clusters of 100 Onits 'and forsingle-family residential.clusters.as small as 30 to 40 units. :may ; PRINCIPLE AN-5: ' All new residential buildings s'hould•be designed to emphasize the visually interesting features of the building, .as seen from the public street. and sidewalk. The visual impact of garage doors, driveways, and other off-street parking will be minimized and mitigated. Policy AN-5.1 Garages and Driveways. To foster visual interest along a neighborhood street, the street frontage devoted to protruding garage doors -and driveway curb crossings will be limited. Generally, garages should be recessed, or if feasible, tucked into side or rear yards, using variety and creativity to avoid a streetscape dominated by the repetition of garage doors. Locating garages further from the street can allow narrower driveway frontage at the curb, leaving more room for an attractive streetscape. It is recognized that there may be ways a residential -property can be custom -designed to mitigate the view of a protruding garage opening. The intent of these policies is not to limit such custom -designed solutions when an individual homeowner has a need or preference for protruding garage openings. Policy AN-5.2 Alleys and Shared Driveways. Alleys and various forms of shared driveways are encouraged in order to improve the visual interest of neighborhood streets by reducing driveway curb cuts and street -facing garage doors. Such alleys and driveways can also serve as locations for ancillary buildings, utilities, service functions, and interior -block parking access. 11 All New Neighborhood (AN) PRINCIPLE AN-1: New neighborhoods will be integral parts of the broader community structure. Policy AN-1.1 Relationships to Residential Districts. Anew neighborhood will be considered as part of a Residential District. In a Residential District, Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhoods will be located around a Medium Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood which has a Neighborhood Commercial Center or Community Commercial District as its core. This provides nearby access to most things a resident or household needs on an everyday basis. Policy AN-1.2 Street Networks. Neighborhood streets and sidewalks will form an interconnected network, including automobile, bicycle and pedestrian routes within a neighborhood and between neighborhoods, knitting neighborhoods together and not forming barriers between them. Dead ends and cul-de-sacs should be avoided or minimized. Multiple streets and sidewalks will connect into and out of a neighborhood. Streets will converge upon or lead directly to the shared facilities in the neighborhood: Policy AN-1.3 Traffic Calming. For a network to provide a desirable residential environment, it must be designed to discourage excessive speeding and cut -through traffic. Street widths and corner curb radii should be as narrow as possible, while still providing safe access for emergency and service vehicles. Frequent, controlled intersections, raised and textured crosswalks, and various other specialized measures maybe used to slow and channel traffic without unduly hampering convenient, direct access and mobility. The Johnson Property site plan shall integrate 7 to 8 different housing types in small clusters to.create visual interest as well as create a variety of people/residents to better blend with the greater surroundings. The overall street patterns/network (auto, pedestrian, and bicycle) will provide strong connections between sub-neighborhoods/amenities as well as surrounding neighborhoods and commercial uses. In the design process, we looked at creating streets with interest as well as providing traffic calming elements to keep traffic slow and reduce cut through on the local level streets. PRINCIPLE AN-2: A wide range of open lands, such as small parks, squares, greens, playfields, naturalrJ areas, orchards and gardens, greenways, and other outdoor spaces should be integrated into ;>xY neighborhoods. Policy AN-2.1 Neighborhood Parks and Outdoor Spaces. Each neighborhood should have small parks or other outdoor spaces located within walking distance of all homes. Outdoor spaces should be designed in conjunction with streets and walkways, to be a formative, purposeful part of any land development, and not merely residual areas left over from site planning for other purposes. They should be mostly surrounded by streets house fronts, to maintain safety and visibility. Policy AN-2.2 Ownership of Outdoor Spaces. Some parks, common open lands and outdoor spaces will be publicly owned, while others will be privately owned. Policy AN-2.3 Untreated Irrigation Water. The use of untreated water should be encouraged and supported where appropriate, to make it less expensive to provide parks, common open lands and outdoor spaces which need irrigation. The park/open space plan for Johnson Property focuses on providing a park or open space element within a 2 block walking distance of each residence. Small pocket parks act as formal visual connections for auto, pedestrians and bicyclists. The main 10 acre public park acts as our neighborhood heart and will be owned, installed, and maintained by the City. The remaining parks and open space will be privately owned and maintained by the neighborhood HOA. 10 The Johnson Property site plan takes major efforts to preserve 2/3 of the site's natural slope bank; preserving the on -site fox den, large stands of existing trees within both farm sites, and a large wood lot within the center of the neighborhood. Natural Areas and Open Space (NOL) PRINCIPLE NOL-1: Preserve and protect natural areas within Fort Collins and the Community Growth Management Area to provide habitat essential to the conservation of plants, animals, and their associated ecosystems and to enrich the lives of citizens by providing opportunities for education, scientific research, nature, interpretation, art, fishing, wildlife observation, hiking, and other activities. Policy NOL-1.2 Urban Development. The City will conserve and integrate natural areas into the developed landscape by directing development away from sensitive areas and using innovative planning, design, and management practices. When it is not possible to direct development away from natural areas, it should integrate them into the developed landscape in a manner that conserves their integrity. The City will encourage and assist efforts by private landowners and organizations to integrate natural areas into new development and to protect, restore, or enhance privately owned natural areas. The Johnson Property site plan takes major efforts to preserve 2/3 of the site's natural slope bank, preserving the site fox den, large stands of existing trees within both farm sites, and a large wood lot .within the center of the neighborhood: PRINCIPLE NOL-3: The City's parks and recreation'system will include parks, trails, open lands, natural areas and urban streetscapes. These 'green spaces" will balance active and passive recreation opportunities in an interconnected framework that is distributed throughout the urban area. Policy NOL-3.2 Urban Public Space. Small pocket parks, public plazas, and sidewalk gathering 'places should include =`street furniture" such as benches, and be incorporated into urban designs for the Downtown Districts, Community Commercial Districts; Commercial Districts, and Residential Districts throughout the City. The Johnson Property site plan<proVides�sri all sub`nbi§hbdrhobd parks of 12to,1.5 acres linked together with by on -street -pedestrian citculation'-These`smaft•urban. (private and public) spaces create gathering and play areas as well, as provides relief along th'&`§freetscene. Each pocket park will contain some street furniture element such as play structure or' benches. Growth Management (GM) PRINCIPLE GM-8: The City will promote compatible infill developments in targeted areas within the Community Growth Management Area Boundary. The Johnson Property site plan provides an inf ill solution that blends in with the existing surrounding land uses and promotes compact development along two (2) major circulation corridors. PRINCIPLE GM-11: The City will involve citizensin the planning and decision -making processes of government. The Johnson Property was part of a larger area workshop orchestrated by the City in 2000 to gain neighborhood input prior to design and development. It is our intent to continue involvement with the neighbors and future neighborhood groups. Our neighborhood meeting was held Monday, July 16, 2001. r I PRINCIPLE HSG-2: The City will encourage the creation and expansion of affordable housing opportunities and preservation of existing housing stock. , Policy HSG-2.5 Distribution of Affordable Housing. The City will encourage a community -wide distribution of affordable housing in all neighborhoods to promote diverse neighborhoods. Again, the Johnson Property is proposing a wide range of densities and compact development which allows for a greater opportunity for affordable housing within a planned neighborhood. PRINCIPLE HSG-3: Neighborhood stability must be maintained and enhanced. Principle HSG-3.1 Development Practices. The character of stable residential neighborhoods should be preserved through neighborhood planning, assistance to neighborhood organizations, and supportive regulatory techniques. Principle HSG-3.2 Historic Residences. The City will explore opportunities to combine development efforts with historic preservation. The City will place priority on preserving existing residential structures of historic value. . The Johnson Property ODP and the James Company believe in a strong neighborhood: viability. _There. will be a structured HOA in which the James Company will set up and run until a certain completion date, then the existing residence (HOA group) will continue to function. Our plan to preserve and buffer both existing farms aims toward a great combined development effort to join the existing farm elements into a neighborhood structure. See above Principle ACD-5 for proposed uses of farmsteads. Environment (ENV) PRINCIPLE ENV-4: Energy efficiency and use of renewable energy resources will be encouraged, ' :facilitated, and regulated in both the public and private sector through information and educational ._ services, financial incentive programs, requirements and incentives in the planning process; enforcement of regulation such as the Energy Code. Policy ENV-4.5 Shading by Trees. The City will consider the location of future trees and trimming of existing trees in public parks, medians, streets and other public areas to prevent existing and future solar energy systems from being shaded. Trees will also be planted to provide natural cooling and shade. The ODP proposed site plan will enhance the cooling and shade provided by the many new street and park trees to be planted. PRINCIPLE ENV-5: Natural habitat/ecosystems (wildlife, wetlands, and riparian areas) will be protected and enhanced within the developed landscape of Fort Collins. Policy ENV-5.1 Protection and Enhancement. The City will seek to integrate wildlife habitat, riparian areas, wetlands and other important natural features into the developed landscape by directing development away from sensitive areas and using innovative planning, design, buffering, and management practices. The City's regulatory powers will be used to preserve, protect, and enhance the resources and values of natural areas by directing development away from sensitive natural features — such as wetlands, riparian areas and wildlife habitat. When it is not possible to direct development away from natural areas, these areas will be protected in the developed landscape. f3 • Varied housing (including affordable). • Balance between jobs and housing and good air quality. The Johnson Property ODP deals with each of these elements. We are promoting compact development with the MMN Neighborhood creating a higher density zone closer to major circulation and neighborhood commercial. 2. We are proposing 7 to 8 different housing types from 3 to 20 du/ac to gain a true mix of housing within small neighborhood clusters to reinforce variety along the streetscene. 3. The Johnson Property is located within walking distance of many industrial/employment facilities. The strong connection along Sharpe Point Drive allows for auto, pedestrian, and bicycle connection. The neighborhood plan also allows for minor employment opportunity within the Industrial zone and the small retail corner along Main Street as well as the retail center within Rigden Farms. Our connection to Timberline also provides fast and easy access to a major North -South corridor within Fort Collins. These three (3) main points illustrate our effort to balance housing and employment within and with the surrounding existing conditions. Housing (HSG) PRINCIPLE HSG-1: "'A variety of housing'types'and densities will be available throughout the urban area for all income levels. Policy HSG-1.1 Land Use Patterns. The City will encourage a variety of housing types and densities, including mixed -use developments, that are well -served by public transportation and close to employment centers; services, and amenities: In particular, the City will promote the siting of higher density housing near public transportation, shopping, and in designated neighborhoods and districts. Policy HSG-1.2 Housing Supply:The "City will•encoumge public and private, for -profit and non-profit sectors to take actions tb=develop and maintain an"'.adequate^supply of single- and multiple -family housing, including mobile homes and manufactureV>libusing, that is proportionately balanced to the wages of our labor force. ' a -' '-; f Policy HSG-1.4 Land for Residential Development. The City will permit residential development in all neighborhoods and districts in order to maximize the potential land available for development of housing and thereby positively influence housing affordability. The Johnson Property site is located along Timberline and Drake, 2 major circulation corridors. We will be focusing the higher density compact development along these 2 corridor routes. We are focusing our neighborhood design to integrate single-family and multi -family housing to provide a mix of residences within the neighborhood. We want to create a better balance and texture between multi -family and single-family uses. To improve the overall affordability of housing, we are proposing 3 to 4 different multi -family housing types, as well as 4 different single-family detached housing types to provide as much visual variety as well as different housing costs. PRINCIPLE CAD-3: - Commercial developments create a powerful impression of the City, both individually and taken together as a whole. While corporate franchises and chain stores will remain vital and recognizable, commercial developments will be designed to contribute to Fort Collins' distinct visual quality and uniqueness. Policy CAD 3-2 Compatibility with Surrounding Development. Proposed commercial buildings must contribute to the positive character of the area. Building materials, architectural details, color range, building massing, and relationships to streets and sidewalks will contribute to a distinctive local district, corridor, or neighborhood. There are two (2) commercial/retail concepts within the Johnson Property Neighborhood. First, along the main street area, we are proposing a small retail corner along Timberline to provide a pedestrian scale. use for neighborhood residence. The second commercial/industrial use is to propose the preservation of the little red house and surrounding area (t7 acres) and propose an office, retail, veterinarian use. We propose to save the functional structures and create a unique business opportunity for a company with vision and desire to be in a special place. By preserving and improving the usable structures within the Jessup Farm area, we will be contributing to the positive character and heritage of the area. PRINCIPLE CAD-5: The quality of life in Fort Collins will be enhanced by the preservation of.histonc resources and inclusion of heritage in the daily life and development of the City and community.; Policy CAD-5.1 Survey, Identification, and Prioritization. The City shall determine what resources 9., :• - _ are within the Community Growth Management Area, how significant these resources are, the nature and degree of threat to their preservation, and methods for their protection. Policy CAD-5.3 Incentives. The City shall use incentives to encourage private sector preservation and rehabilitation of historic resources. The Johnson Property site plan design process balanced the initial feedback from the City to preserve _ boththeJessup and Johnson Property farms and provide an adequate buffer with the Historic... Preservation Report by our consultant to conclude the following: r 1. The Jessup Farni will be zoned industrial where we propose to save the red house and.other usable structures for a unique office area. An architectural firm, lawyer, artist, veterinarian (for a few, examples) would use the main intact structures into a small office "village". 2. The Johnson Farm to the south will be preserved as a single-family residence with a larger buffer area. We hope to coordinate with the City to gain incentives for private sector preservation and/or rehabilitation of these historic resources. We have proposed adequate buffers for both farm areas in conjunction with open space and residential neighborhoods. Economic Sustainability and Development (ECON) Policy ECON-1.4 Jobs/Housing Balance. The City will strive to ensure that a reasonable balance exists between housing demand created by growth in lower income jobs and residential development capacity. The City will encourage existing and future major employers locating within the City to develop employer -assisted housing programs for lower income employees. The City should provide technical assistance to employers wishing to obtain information on model programs. Within the City Plan there are several important objectives to balance the appropriate land uses within the overall City. • Promote compact development. M ..a - neighborhood or district, provided that they meet necessary safety, accessibility and maintenance requirements. Policy CAD-1.2 Street Layout. New street will make development an integrated extension of the community. The street pattern will be simple, interconnected and direct, avoiding circuitous routes. Multiple routes should be provided between key destinations. Streets should be located to consider physical features, and to create views and prominent locations for civic landmarks such as parks, plazas and schools. Policy CAD-1.3 Streetscape Design. All new streets will be functional, safe and visually appealing. Shade trees, landscaped medians and parkways, public art, and other amenities will be included in the streetscape. Policy CAD-1.4 Street Tree Design. Street trees should be used in a formal architectural'fashion to reinforce, define and connect the spaces and corridors created by buildings and other features along a street. Canopy shade -trees shall constitute the majority of tree plantings, and a mixture of tree types shall be included, arranged to establish partial urban tree canopy cover. Existing trees shall be preserved to the maximum extent feasible. The Johnson Property -Neighborhood ODP identifies flour (4) main access points; Timberline (1), Drake (2), and Sharpe Point,Drive (1), meeting the.City's access and intersection criteria. We will then create a strong interconnecting -hierarchy or street;patte,rns focusing on intimate sub -neighborhood pocket parks and amenity elements. We will focus -the street pattern on direct (non -circuitous) routes with multiple routes to key destination- points: All street design -shall meet City standards. We will also apply our design focus to the street sections as well as streef layout with landscape framing, parkways, and focal points. PRINCIPLE CAD-2: ; - Public spaces; such as plazas, civic buildings, outdoor spaces, parks, and gateway landscapes should be designed to be functional, accessible, attractive, safe and comfortable. Policy CAD-2.1 Civic Buildings and Grounds. Civic facilities — such as community buildings, government offices, recreation centers,:post offices; ,plazass°libraries, and schools — should be placed in central locations as highly visible focal -points. TheKrdan design and architectural quality should express permanence, importance, and respect for broad citizen. preferences and community identity. Major public buildings should have,a civic presence .enhanced.,tiytheir;height, ass and materials. In addition, public buildings should: • Be accessible by motorized vehicles, transit; bicycles and pedestrians. Be integrated into a setting that includes generous landscaping and/or public outdoor spaces. Policy CAD-2.2 Public Space Design. Mixed -use commercial and civic design proposals should incorporate one or several design components related to public outdoor space including pedestrian circulation, transit facilities, plazas, pocket parks, sitting areas, children's play areas and public art. The proposed site plan allows for a neighborhood (private) recreation center to be part of the focal point of the public neighborhood park and main street element. The architecture and landscape design will create an identity for the neighborhood. The recreation center acts as an anchor along the main street and provides a "civic" like structure within the neighborhood. The main street concept provides a combination of limited retail, residential, outdoor public spaces, and an urban pedestrian zone to create a high intensity for active areas. Small pocket parks within each sub - neighborhood also act as focal points, within each sub -neighborhood. r W PRINCIPLE T-5. The City will acknowledge pedestrian travel as a viable transportation mode and elevate it in importance to be in balance with all other modes. Direct pedestrian connections will be provided and encouraged from place of residence to transit, schools, activity centers, work and public facilities. Policy T-5.1 Land Use. The City will promote a mix of land uses and activities that will maximizethe potential for pedestrian mobility throughout the community. Policy T-5.2 Connections. Pedestrian connections will be clearly visible and accessible, incorporating markings, signage, lighting and paving materials. Other important pedestrian considerations include: a. Building entries as viewed from the street should be clearly marked. Buildings should be sited in ways to make their entries or intended uses clear to and convenient for pedestrians. b. The location and pattern of streets, buildings and open spaces must facilitate direct pedestrian access. Commercial buildings should provide direct access from street corners to improve access to but stop facilities. Shopping areas should provide for pedestrian and bicycle connections to adjoining neighborhoods. c. Creating barriers which separate commercial developments from residential areas and transit should be avoided. Lot patterns should provide safe and direct pedestrian connections from „. residential. areas to schools, parks, transit, employment centers, and other neighborhood uses._.. . d. Direct sidewalk access should be provided between cul-de-sacs and nearby transit facilities. The Johnson Property site plan maximizes pedestrian mobility throughout the neighborhood as.well as maximizes connections to neighborhood and regional amenities. Direct pedestrian access will'be =_ " addressed for each resident and neighborhood retail use to ensure adequate public connections. The initial secondary street circulation study has illustrated minimal to no cul-de-sac use to ensure interconnected street and pedestrian patterns. Internal open space will provide for pedestrian circulation N _within the community.. . PRINCIPLE T-6: Street crossings will be developed to be safe, comfortable, and attractive T PRINCIPLE T-7. The City will encourage the development of comfortable and attractive pedestrian facilities and settings to create an interesting pedestrian network. PRINCIPLE T-8: The City shall develop secure pedestrian settings by developing a well -lit inhabited pedestrian network and by mitigating the impacts of vehicles. . The Johnson Property neighborhood will incorporate safe design strategies to provide a safe and convenient pedestrian system. Details of these crossings, walk layout, lighting, etc. will be. illustrated at a project development plan submittal. Community Appearance and Design (CAD) PRINCIPLE CAD-1: Each addition to the street system will be designed with consideration to the visual character and the experience of the citizens who will use the street system and the adjacent property. Together, the layout of the street network and the streets themselves will contribute to the character, form, and scale of the City. Policy CAD-1.1 Street Design Standards. All new public streets must conform to the City street standards. Alternative street designs may be approved by the City where they are needed to accommodate unique situations, such as important landscape features or distinctive characteristics of a 4 Policy T-1.4 Adequate Facilities. The City will ensure the provision of adequate facilities for the movement of goods and people while maintaining the integrity of existing streets and minimizing travel - related impacts within residential neighborhoods. As growth occurs, appropriate transportation investments should be made to support increased demands for travel. The proposed site plan has integrated several residential densities with some non-residential uses, such as a small retail corner along the main street as well as a potential office use for the Jessup Farm Property. All of the major street corridors will provide for multi -modal transportation to continue appropriate connections from Timberline, Drake and Sharp Point Drive. The City transit services will be very important for the Johnson Property neighborhood to help alleviate traffic on Timberline and Drake as well as provide an alternative modes of transportation. The overall open space plan creates destination or target areas for pedestrians and bicyclists to minimize daily automobile trips and encourage social interaction. The future expansion of Timberline will provide adequate movement as growth occurs. PRINCIPLE T-2: Mass Transit will be an integral part of the City's overall transportation system. Policy T-2.1 Transit System. The City's public transit system will be expanded to provide integrated, high -frequency transit service along major transportation corridors, with feeder transit lines connecting all major district destinations, consistent with the adopted Transit Development Plan (1996). Policy T-2.2 Transit Stops. Transit stcosMll,,beintegrated into existing and future business districts and Neighborhood Commercial Centers in a way that makes it easy for transit riders to shop, access local services, and travel to work. Transit stops -should be provided no more than M mile walking distance of most residences to the extent feasible. The design and location of transit stops should function as an integral part of these destinations and provide adequate lighting, security, pedestrian amenities, and weather protection. Johnson Property will coordinate with the Public Transit Systems to help expand services and help maintain and enhance the future transit systems that are vital to a strong community. By providing high density housing and the retail along Timberline, use of alternative transportation will be encouraged. PRINCIPLE T-4: Bicycling will serve -as a. viable�alterrative td.autom"obile use for all trip purposes. Policy T-4.1 Bicycle Facilities. The City will encourage bicycling for transportation through an urban growth pattern that places major activity centers and neighborhood destinations within a comfortable bicycling distance, that assures safe and convenient access by bicycle, and that reduces the prominence of motorized transportation in neighborhoods and other pedestrian and bicyclist -oriented districts. Facility design will also plan for: a. Continuous bicycle facilities that establish system continuity and consistency city-wide. Facility design will be incorporated into new development and street construction projects — linking to adjacent facilities. b. Bicycle access should be improved to major activity centers, schools and neighborhoods, and barriers removed in these areas to improve circulation. Facility development, safety and convenience should be established throughout these destinations. Level of service standards for bicyclists should be higher within these areas. The Johnson Property proposed site plan will include a bicycle transportation system that will encourage both pedestrian and bicycle use and connect into the City-wide system. On -street lanes will connect the primary activity nodes within the community as well as connecting to adjacent residential and commercial uses. Appropriate details such as lane width and other details will be finalized at the Site Plan Resolution Phase. Land Use (LU) PRINCIPLE LU-1: Growth within the City will promote a compact development pattern within a well- defined boundary. Policy LU-1.1 Compact Urban Form. The desired urban form will be achieved by directing future development to mixed -use neighborhoods and districts while reducing the potential for dispersed growth not conducive to pedestrian and transit use and cohesive community development. Our Concept focuses higher density compact development along the major circulation routes. The proposed development plan complements the City Plan Uses and is consistent with the adjacent land uses. PRINCIPLE LU-2: The City will maintain and enhance its character and sense of place as defined by its neighborhoods, districts, corridors, and edges. Policy LU-2.1 City -Wide Structure. The City will adopt a city-wide structure of neighborhoods, districts, corridors, and edges as a means of creating identifiable places and achieving the goals of compact development that is well -served by all modes of travel. Policy LU-2.2 Urban Design. The design review process, supplemented by design standards and guidelines, will be used to promote new construction and redevelopment that contribute positively, to the type of neighborhoods, districts, corridors and edges described herein while emphasizing the special identity of each area. The Johnson Property neighborhood fits within the larger context of Eastern Fort Collins. It is joined to existing community facilities, employment areas, and public amenities. The neighborhood is located along major transportation corridors, meets current housing needs, and contributes to the preservation of the City's_heritage while providing compact growth within the City's boundary... _ The design philosophy for Johnson Property will create a strong sense of place for the neighborhood. With a focus on open space density and a mix of housing types, Johnson Property will provide.a great'. t living environment. With a high level of detail focusing on the streetscape and-the landscape design, we „ Will improve the overall residential streetscape through architectural guidelines, interesting street: patterns, .. and a formalized landscape treatment for street plantings and open space,areas. k Transportation (T) PRINCIPLE T-1: The physical organization of the City will be supported by a framework of transportation alternatives that maximizes access and mobility throughout the City, while reducing dependence upon the private automobile. Policy T-1.1 Land Use Patterns. The City will implement land use patterns, parking policies, and demand management plans that support effective transit, an efficient roadway system, and alternative transportation modes. Appropriate residential densities and non-residential land uses should be within walking distance of transit stops, permitting public transit to become a viable alternative to the automobile. Policy T-1.2 Multi -Modal Streets. Street corridors will provide for safe and convenient use of all modes of travel, including motor vehicles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Policy T-1.3 Street Design Criteria. The City will establish street design criteria to support transit, ride -sharing and non -motorized modes of transportation, which minimize conflicts between transportation modes, are compatible with surrounding land uses, and meet the needs of the users. S. d July 17, 2001 JOHNSON PROPERTY Overall Development Plan DOWNING THORPE, JAMES I. Statement of appropriate city plan principles and policies achieved by the proposed overall development plan. This document will address the community -wide Principles and Policies of Fort Collins City Plan in the following order: • Land Use (LU) • Transportation (T) • Community Appearance and Design (CAD) • Economic Sustainability and Development (ECON) • Housing • Environment (ENV) "` ''• • 'Natural Areas and Open Lands (NOI) Growth Management • All New Neighborhoods (AN) • Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhoods (LMN) • Medium Mixed -Use Neighborhood (MMN) • Industrial Districts t lr. It i) Master utility and overall Drainage Plan (.13 copies) (unfolded) for water, sewer and stormwater. j) Overall Drainage report (4 copies), which complies with the appropriate City Basin Master Plans in the Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards. k) One rendered set (not folded) of the overall development plan to be submitted prior to the Planning and Zoning Board Hearing. I) One 8-1/2" x 11" (Photo Mechanical Transfer) PMT for each sheet of the Overall Development Plan to be submitted prior to the Planning and Zoning Board Hearing. m) Signed reproducible Mylar of the overall development plan to be submitted after Planning and Zoning Board approval. - n) A Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) (6 copies) prepared in accordance with the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. o) Other information and data as the Director may require for full and complete consideration of the development. . .-. ; Revised January 14. 2002 c) Three lists of names and addresses of all owners of record of real property within a least five hundred (500') feet (see supplemental Notice Requirements of Section 2.2.6 of the Land Use Code) of the property lines of the parcel of land for which the overall development plan is proposed, exclusive of public right-of-way. Two lists shall be typed on mailing labels (33 names per sheet) the other list shall be a reproducible copy of those labels. d) A statement of planning objectives (26 copies), including: i) Statement of appropriate City Plan Principles and Policies achieved by the proposed overall Development Plan. ii) Description of existing and proposed, open space, buffering, landscaping, circulation, transition areas, wetlands and natural areas. 7.4 ....; iii) Estimate of number ofiemployees for commercial and industrial uses. . iv) Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant. v) Written narrative addressing each /issue raised at the neighborhood meetings(s), if a meeting was held. vi). Name•.ofithe,project as we.11ras any�previous name(s) the project F may have been-knowh�by�zx* , vii) A narrative descripticn'of h'owconflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated:' e) A copy of the applicable conceptual review letter and an explanation of how issues have been addressed. f) A legal description of the site. g) A statement of proposed ownership and maintenance responsibility of public and private open space areas. h) A development phasing schedule including the sequence for each phase, approximate size in areas of each phase, and proposed phasing .of construction of public improvements, recreation, and common open space areas. Revised January 14, 2002 r k) Area shown on the overall development plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the proposal to include a survey of the area within at least one -hundred fifty (150') feet of the proposal, exclusive of public right-o-way, at the same scale as the proposal and include the following (except if natural areas are in the vicinity, then any natural areas within five hundred (500') feet are to be shown): i) Land uses, locations of principal structures and major existing landscape features. ii) Densities of existing or approved residential uses. iii) Traffic circulation system. iv) Natural features of the landscape. v) General topographical mapping at the same scale as the overall development plan. 1). A vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at . . least one (1) mile showing at least the following: Zoning districts. Traffic circulation system with street names labeled :.;'. iii) Major public facilities. { iv) Location of existing municipal boundary lines and, if applicable, the urban growth area boundary. m) A notarized signature block of Owner's certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth on the overall development plan (to be signed after final approval of the overall development plan). 3) The overall development plan shall be accompanied by: a) The name and address of each owner of property in the Overall Development Plan area. b) A list of names of all general and limited partners (if a partnership), all managers and directors (if a limited liability company) and/or officers and directors (if a corporation) involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development. Revised January 14, 2002 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1) Application form, filing fee, and sign posting fee. 2) An overall development plan (30 copies) (folded) composed of one or more sheets with an outer dimension of twenty four by thirty six inches (24" x 36") shall be submitted containing the following information: a) Parcel size. b) Existing topographical character of the land at a contour appropriate with the scale of the project reference vertical elevation datum used. NGVD 29;is preferred;. all water co7U, ses; flood plains; floodways; natural features; 'and exist ' g vegq#ation'`(including all trees and shrubs having a diameter greater than two.and one-half (2-1/2") inches by species), wetlands, natural areas -and -wildlife movement corridors. c) An estimate of the limits of development. (reference Section 3.3.7(C)(1) of the Land Use Code) d) Existing zoning. e) Approximate acreage and densityjgf,edth area _number; height, and type of resideritial units; -floor aiaa height; and1ypes of business, commercial,<and�industrial uses: `�;�1 :+� �_~ A f) Location and general nature of each land use. g) Total land area and approximate location and amount of open space included in the residential, business, commercial, and industrial areas. h) Approximate location of proposed and existing arterial collector and connector streets and major pedestrian and bicycle routes, including major points of access. i) Locations of all major utilities. j) Approximate location and size in acres of any public use proposed such as parks, school sites, and similar pubic or semi-public uses. Revised January 14, 2002 M' compromises neighborhood continuity and connectivity (which is outweighed by safety); and (5) does not interfere with the plans ability to provide access to other features and amenities within the same section mile. Based on the foregoing, James Company respectfully requests City approval for this alternative compliance request for the Johnson Farms potentially signalized, full -movement intersection along Timberline, as shown on the pending ODP. Should you have any questions, I can be reached at (303) 443-6666. Sincerely, James Comp amesCompp Janl'y Melinda J. Bartlett _ Entitlement Manager cc: James Postle Susan Wade C:Wehnda BardertJohnson Fropertylaltemauve compliance req ODP.doc 3 Ys' P G. JamesCompany 2919 Valmont Road, Suite 204 Boulder, Colorado 80301 303-443-6666 303-443-6777 Fax January 22, 2002 VIA FAX (970) 416-2020 AND MALL Troy Jones, City Planner Current Planning Department City of Fort Collins P.O. Box 580 - Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Website: jamescompanycolorado.com E-mail: jamesco@gwest.net Johnson Farms-0DP , Alternative Compliance Request (Intersections) Dear Mr. Jones: James Company hereby submits this alternative compliance request to allow a potentially signalized, full -movement intersection along Timberline Road. The Johnson Farms ODP shows 'Such an intersection 1985 feet north of Drake Road. This intersection is located more than 1,320 feet from Drake Road, which spacing does not comply with LUC 3.6.3 [C]. _ Nevertheless, tlirs location has already beenrdetermrned by the City's Traffic Engineer and Street Oversizing Coordinaior to be the best It)cat on; for such an intersection. Additionally, on February 1, 2001, the Planning and Zoning'tBoafT supported Stafrs recommendations and approved this location for Spring Creek Farms -Nor zthe development directly west of Johnson Farms. The intersection spacing proposed for Johnson Farms matches up with the approved Spring Creek Farms North. alignment;- therefore, -James Company's alternative compliance request should likewise be approved. The reasons Staff and the P+Z Board -approved the intersection for Spring Creek Farms North apply equally to James Company's request. The proposed alternatively -spaced Johnson Farms intersection promotes the goal of ensuring that the "local street system is well designed with regard to safety, efficiency and convenience for automobile, bicycle, pedestrian and transit modes of travel"- (LUC 3.6.3 [A]). The proposed plan meets this goal better than a plan that complies with the 1,320 feet requirement. Timberline will be a 6-lane major arterial, and signalized intersections with such a street type are safest when located at 113 mile spacing, rather than 1/4 mile spacing. Additionally, the proposed alternative design (1) has no impacts on natural areas and features; (2) allows for non -vehicular movements at this intersection as well as at Drake Road; (3) satisfies transportation level of service standards; (4) only slightly T h r e e D e c a d e s 0 f B u i l d i n g Q u a l i f y H o m e s IV LMMIYED MEI.NROARODD041.Pf,.j IPJ noiN UNTS BINDLE I�11> : ON, O FO OYOA O O OAWLAlrMW MULTI FAMILY UMrEDREIALEM4 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Johnson Property FORT COLLINS, COLORADO LIMIT OOF FD eauNVARr/ F pCVGLOlEM2NT LEGEND rw wrEr Y wnMlYwnan MYEe• �� d \ 00000 POINT DIOVL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COLLECTOR° O O o O O O ' \p p \O o 00E) O O I N\\ O 0 0 O O ��ppLL.9OT0 O O 0 0 0 O 00 O °OO00000 o ,; \ D 1r29iNE A•F.y'CLl `lEN' Q '�:• h �Nn copspNA-iDM O Rn c Duals MaE p O \ Vf p \�'\ V O� ' I M4XIIM: VY11S` 90FT TRAIL 'ErALT¢p O O O O \ (�T x19T50 T d► II �� Vm ER M[DIVM MI%Ep NCpHR00.WW � J� \� n I it op 3510 n25 IwPC 18 CNTSE8 w+Y. � I O� ooPxs uwrs O O I �IlsJ PAC(/Il I� II SINGLE EPMIIV pP.i..CHEO 1 r' a slucv-XLn.r-mrar VrZr yRp O O I.,I JE:tiwkEt c.,(F., wLO O DElexinM II „ l�QY�. DRAKE ROAD bl � b00(:000000 I: i' MATGHLINE �: OVERALL PROJECT SUMMARY +drum xwn.c+Y YYurornnwso. EVPaY wwnEas EnandY �,,, YNRL E�V�EMD4EPVIIrfMd 'IEII wr«O VIE EENKn SfnO.KMrAfbr9WIEE `�.YERO.t.K+MdEROCYEEY(uYl N SKTMrIXLMMOEMI®IYYM.I( n:MUMrumaoEu+n My dumnnElm .l^�MY�YE rl...a.MMM..rno o.xR EIR.s.YE y eYMdx;� �� ��` �, c.En. wmunnnrodvwoe CNr VYE \ 9P6 1 ItlplYl I `\ 1>3 41N1"V r. l LIMIT OF pE.'vLLOFMEM 1R00'BUFFERFROM WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAM,(NO BUILD ZONE WRN RESTRICTIVE OVERLAY) • A22.5 AC R96,.. 9 LIMIT F ITVM- "-M 4a LIMIT OF p@VELOPMENT ' w+� Ymwe ILYYr.ww..srcw warn iaveYRM .a u+wrr¢ AYo Y.Y 4rNE x Tw6 MVEE x. Rwa.....e.wo vnvu.m.rn.w PMEII.n un Ylm.cRrG c.LnErrloEs .lv .v..n.EIEEm� r M.MYYI.EE.V O.T.W^2.E.GVMKT. F'w vwrmEw '� ��nEn`rERn E. +a YWw YXMCN NYLE1w+�Y! M.�arolm Ln.L a.w.Ys r0 rU rN ■T MY Ii d'i 7 m ,� * j �"" I � �OR.y kF�. JBmes nrt dT r yI yam: Xns SHEET 2 OF 2 67777I � DOWNIM C�J m SGLEI' � 3M OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ' Ir LEGAL DESCRIPTION AY'I V WO NWR M IRIpN fq gMflr l xN,�� NMY N N!r O M TI ..Y.. IMIYN fdMiV. C4LML0. xMLY. CdL9PM! M IONM ][GIYI f! N !! IU! MO fCr. MO 1!M MI NMM1 pMrMid MNY I10.M MR14 n rallYlID IIIIN M NIIIONr 1q wp NOx n . qll .wx faw art iin.tl ren. xv m �,'.•-. �+.e.f rm w M 10111...Or mIA V f.O MrNI A, MINI IIUI.'NY Td M AI. Mwl W MlIIIIMOILf I!!IR-V-MV LM! V M DI[rK ..•I�L'L. M✓[ engr elra-v uK Na,1 NY N.iN rm m . rwn dl �fCY,ll VS N fID [6'IIfN $ MpS Md1! !l4 fONN tM. 4r IDI..M IrLe'w exva wn.l�[Nitu N. Iron .i owwewNu� �Nl .r o®ro ewa� Iml,'mY ir.n Tree. xe Nw x,n.'mir iNN vi. .,e .vm mvmr e N vr. �� m.,a ra+�we! .mow' Y�.r se�''mYin rT N M mxK, xe txG vwrt . M .m Y.n+.Y! n mes N rmr r INI.I IW4 N xN1 V M I!X Yll. IMIY mYMM1. 0µ'm MOI [OINpG M M f.N.ln6e w- OYAP A f!O f[R4 ID N NIII.O W mmY /•L ln,l x! Nwam evntlb laox MIM moam L mM1.'.m ll.N M wL..v uo w!a NNI a M f.unnm [llflp ar Yo [[vrn l..Yu MM txMi wRO'UY IiT.tl rrel Ytltl M 4/M W[ V M Y.D UYIIYYII W-WMP ro M blll'IYJI W' Iq M M IYCr NftlO M N01. �ffi.e •/fL �U V M LMYOI NYIIM1 A[ONY MA MM M NT IN[ V M fM m�iY Y� � i vn�'il,.[rlrl4 NL �ml�'mM �f.aN r6e A M wmw[!1 !1'ID1 lI.p.N IQr A. NM 4 rill101Atr INw- r'tl ffi'm lYIIYIgOY xpTAI I1.NIM�PMgp rKIQ npn M W xWr-ANirw uR Im11Yr9 [wwU Yrlr rLLf, M IOf GNOr> O�1.0 � N0111! ClMffi]! rf[r ♦ IWr W M'ar 4N Y M wllllfNe Yt-gl.l1N P !.0 R'IW !R TNR Nptl'Ni rlID.tl INi MNO M Nei Y[ O M W .IIIII.x6r 0[YW1R i,NIS iOID'1!Y ffii.N IQr A M 1YIr O rlYwi. PROJECT TEAM v..-... ate. .�r.....�.`.'-.. Y..rr �•� r.ry.a irr..Y OWNER OWNER'S CERTIFICATION PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APPROVAL OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Johnson Property FORT COLLINS, COLORADO LEGEND CONTEXT DIAGRAM '. pI aenar. xGe a ICINITY MAP PROJECT NOTES I. A. Ylwwi M1./�ll.yr.11 MI./�. /Iw MII r. r�Ww w�r.^M/^�. ✓w. Nv.rM rrYr. Y..wl N.I.wr L.b.. ANI, tw w..W .+.tw. fruwr �twY, nwNw .rY.Y...YrIY. xruxre L•W. ,�,. F+/r....^.r4 w' r tiwww Y.I.M �`� Y`r^W�rY4.•a. MY w.r rrel .�•rrwuy rwrw.N�. IY��rYy �.WYw. Tyr. rll r,MN /..M Mw.N tl M! tlwiM� M.'tiall M.n.illy 1Y Y1 iWil�Y.rM./.. YYI wwi .�!•.`rMw-...•..yw,.r /.0 wl r.wlur✓'•u••wl w�wWr�/..! [.N.. ,w rp rl µwxrY.,rlwry �..Mi rF.rw. wmw w...w...r.r M ur.wuM w M N4 Wwi N MI Wf.Y.}Y YMY. Lly iYX n...b.n MIMr /WY .YM. MIIr.�w.. LI•/l..n.'I. uM�.ww�� ysrtl Y 4M • ryY.tM F WF.YINY. !W WOIn M ruN /.!4 N 0..'tM MM1R mr.x.r xXl r N,www rYl .n.riul Yr rnY.. r /a. • M/Nr..r.r�.u.xYxr .I...w rMY /M w.YYMM�•ntMw. �r WY M IN Llay M M UM. LYr 1r L.r. •. /r.ly�a. rlrrf...r...rr.rl.ryrr. rv...Yr..y �. l /JI YIY. Y Yr..lM wI �t N. w�Y l,.r..Nxw rYr.wi .. LIMIYI Ywl./...r• F Yr. LMI IIYWI.MI r� s Mwl r'F.n..�r.e. Y.1[ M ,M N a..laY rr.Y /r.w r...r rru.wul r. N � Mwl .rni� �Y MM iw w �MI•.w.y.nYb/MH n N. tl •YYMI MIrM w.rwX we,r..n.�T In.ly n.t r e�.wYY9......� x.+r�....r...• •r..Y.Y.r r...r. nx r I�r• y x. q.wy w ..� lrr. MMww��ww.wtn! NwIY. Y M..rwYl /rr. r er W wI r.rl[..Y. r . rYII rrJr' N r y.�r.lx.i� w mart. w. nw.wrtl.r.r...Ttrr.�lY...w e,.a..NYr prr wN+.yrrRYr V T 1 OF ] WVER 5HEET 'a1@T Z OF 3 Ovwtn VVITLO►rI&e PLrYlI Janesc0m wry gc,tg—= " SHEET 1 OF 2 0-i UJAMES_.� COVER SHEET oil Johnson Property, Overall Development Plan, #32-01A February 21, 2002 P & Z Hearing Page 8 G. Section 2.3.2 (H)(7) — Drainage Master Plan This criterion requires an ODP to be consistent with the appropriate Drainage Basin Master Plan. All criteria and constraints of the Drainage Basin Master Plans were utilized in the preparation of the overall drainage report. H. Section 2.3.2 (H)(8) — Application of Housing Density and Mix of Uses Calculations This criterion requires that any standards in the Code relating to housing density and mix of uses will be applied over the entire ODP, not on each individual Project Development Plan (PDP) review. Each future PDP submittal will be required to be consistent with the densities stated in the ODP. FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSIONS: In reviewing the Johnson Property Overall Development Plan, staff makes the following findings of fact and conclusions: 1. The ODP was reviewed and evaluated against the criteria of the Land Use Code. 2. The ODP meets all applicable criteria and standards required for the review of Overall Development Plans except for Section 3.6.3[C] for the full movement intersection spacing along Timberline Road. 3. The application meets the criteria for alternative compliance requests for Section 3.6.3[C] for the intersection spacing along Timberline Road because the City's Traffic Engineer has found that the proposed site design is safer than one that meets the street spacing criteria. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Staff recommends approval of the alternative compliance request for Section 3.6.3[C] for the intersection spacing along Timberline Road. 2. Staff recommends approval of the Johnson Property Overall Development Plan, File #32-01 A. Johnson Property, Overall Development Plan, #32-01A February 21, 2002 P & Z Hearing Page 7 Nonsignalized, potentially limited movement intersections with Timberline Road - The applicant provides intersections along Timberline Road at least every 660 feet along the property's frontage with the exception of the northern 1,100 feet of the site where the topographical feature of the valley wall precludes any intersections. This standard is thereby satisfied along Timberline Road. 3. The Transportation Level of Service Requirements (LUC 3.6.4) are intended to ensure that "the project shall demonstrate that all adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards will be achieved for all modes of transportation." The plan satisfies all of the transportation Level of Service requirements for all modes of transportation in all locations of the site. E. Section 2.3.2 (H)(5) — Transportation Connections to Adjoining Properties This criterion requires an ODP to provide for the location of transportation connections to adjoining properties to ensure connectivity into and through the ODP site from neighboring properties for vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle movement. All development plans shall incorporate and continue all sub -arterial streets stubbed to the boundary of the development plan by previously approved plans or existing development. All development plans shall provide for future public street connections to adjacent developable parcels by providing a local street connection spaced at intervals not to exceed 660 feet along each development plan boundary that abuts potentially developable or redevelopable land. The ODP application satisfies these criteria by providing a stub connection to the future Sharp Point Drive extension. F. Section 2.3.2 (11-11)(6) — Natural Features This criterion requires an ODP to indicate the location and size of all natural areas and features within its boundaries and shall indicate the applicant's estimate of the limits of development and natural area buffer zones. There are no "natural areas and features" identified on this site on the City's "Natural Areas and Features Inventory Map." The applicant has however shown the following features on the ODP map: The topography of the valley wall, existing wetlands, existing row of mature trees (labeled as a "woodlot") , existing fox den, and the 2 existing historic farmsteads. Johnson Property, Overall Development Plan, #32-01A February 21, 2002 P & Z Hearing Page 6 • provides for distribution of the development's traffic without exceeding level of service standards, • enhances neighborhood continuity and connectivity, • provides direct, sub -arterial street access to any parks, schools, neighborhood centers, commercial uses, employment uses, and Neighborhood Commercial Districts within or adjacent to the development from existing or future adjacent development within the same section mile. This alternative design has no impacts on natural areas and features. Non - vehicular movements across Timberline are provided at the Drake signal and this proposed signalized intersection location. The alternative plan satisfies transportation level of service standards, and slightly compromises neighborhood continuity and connectivity only in the name of "safety" (which is stated as one of the intents of the purpose of this section). Additionally, the alternative design does not have any bearing upon the plan's ability to provide direct subarterial street connections to parks, schools, neighborhood centers, commercial uses, or Neighborhood Commercial Districts within the same section mile. b) Additional nonsignalized, potentially limited movement collector or local street intersections with arterial streets shall be spaced at intervals not to exceed 660 feet between full movement collector or local street intersections, unless rendered infeasible due to unusual topographic features, existing development or a natural feature (LUC 3.6.3(D]). Nonsignalized, potentially limited movement intersections with Drake Road - A limited movement local street intersection with Drake is provided approximately 550 feet east of Timberline, which satisfies this requirement for the segment Drake Road frontage along the first approximately 1,200 feet east of Timberline Road. The second area of Drake Road frontage is approximately 1,100 feet in length, starting at roughly 2,450 feet east of Timberline and running east from that point for approximately 1,100 feet. This segment of frontage would normally require at least two nonsignalized, potentially limited movement intersections; however, because of the topographical constraint of the valley wall, only one intersection is required. The applicant proposes one intersection approximately 660 east of an existing off -site intersection along Drake Road, thereby satisfying this standard. Johnson Property, Overall Development Plan, #32-01A February 21, 2002 P & Z Hearing Page 5 signalized full -movement intersection is proposed on Drake Road approximately 950 feet east of Timberline Road, thereby satisfying this standard for this area of abutment along Drake. The second area is approximately 1,100 feet of frontage starting at roughly 2,450 feet east of Timberline and running east from that point for approximately 1,100 feet. Only one limited movement intersection is proposed along this segment because any full movement intersections would be infeasible due to the unusual topographic feature of the valley wall, and the existing development constraint of the approved curve in the road along the Drake/Ziegler realignment. Potentially Signalized. full movement intersections with Timberline Road — The ODP has 4,350 feet of frontage along Timberline Road. If there were no topographical constraints or existing development constraints, three potentially signalized full -movement intersections would be required, however because of the valley wall and existing railroad tracks in the area, only one of the three intersections is required in accordance with the standard. An alternative compliance request has been submitted because the one potentially signalized full -movement intersection that is required would be located further from Drake than the required 1,320 feet; it is located approximately 1,985 feet north of Drake Road. This location was determined as the best location for a signal by the City's Traffic Engineer, and the City's Street Oversizing Coordinator. As stated in 3.6.3[A] of the LUC, the purpose of this section is to "ensure that the local street system is well designed with regard to safety, efficiency and convenience for automobile, bicycle, pedestrian and transit modes of travel." In reviewing an alternative plan, the decision maker must determine that the proposed alternative plan accomplishes the purpose of the section equally well or better than would a plan and design which complies with the standards of the section. This alternative compliance request better accomplishes the purposes of Section 3.6.3 Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards than would a plan that complies with the standard because the City's Traffic Engineer has found that the proposed site design is safer than one that meets the street spacing criteria. Timberline will be a 6-lane major arterial, and signalized intersections with such a street type are safest when located at one-third mile spacing rather than one -quarter mile spacing. When the decision maker reviews an alternative design, it must also be taken into account whether the alternative design: • minimizes the impacts on natural areas and features, • fosters non -vehicular access, f Johnson Property, Overall Development Plan, #32-01A February 21, 2002 P & Z Hearing Page 4 either the City limits or unincorporated Larimer County within the Urban Growth Area. Existing urban development is defined as industrial uses; commercial/retail uses; institutional/civic/public uses; or residential uses having an overall minimum density of at least one unit per acre; and provided that all engineering improvements for such development are completed. This site is directly north of the Rigden Farm development and directly southwest across the railroad tracks from the existing Prospect Industrial Park and the Prospect Business Park. These common boundaries with adjacent developments constitute more than 1 /6 of the proposed development boundaries, which in turn satisfies the contiguity requirements. D. Section 2.3.2 (H)(4) — Master Street Plan, Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards, and Transportation Level of Service Requirements This criterion requires an ODP to conform to the Master Street Plan requirements (as specified in the LUC 3.6.1) and the Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards (as specified in the LUC 3.6.3) both within and adjacent to the boundaries of the plan. 1. The Master Street Plan (LUC 3.6.1) identifies Drake Road (east of Timberline) as a 2-lane minor arterial and Timberline Road adjacent to the site as a 6 lane major arterial (beyond 2015). The ODP recognizes these designations and provides for the dedication of appropriate right-of-way and necessary improvements at the time of Project Development Plan review. The extension of Sharp Point Drive from the north into the site is identified on the Master Street Plan, and is incorporated into this design. 2. The Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards (LUC 3.6.3) are intended to ensure that the local street system is well designed with regard to safety, efficiency and convenience for automobile, bicycle, pedestrian and transit modes of travel. There are three specific subsections of the Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards (3.6.3[C], 3.6.3[D], 3.6.3(E]) that are applicable in order to satisfy the ODP review criteria. - a) Potentially signalized, full -movement intersections of collector or local streets with arterial streets must be provided at least every 1,320 feet (114 mile) along arterial streets, unless rendered infeasible due to unusual topographic features, existing development or a natural area or feature (LUC 3.6.3[C]). Potentially Signalized, full -movement intersections with Drake Road - The ODP abuts Drake Road in two areas. The first area is the first approximately 1,200 feet east of Timberline Road along Drake Road. A potentially It Johnson Property, Overall Development Plan, #32-01A February 21, 2002 P & Z Hearing Page 3 attached dwelling units, and single-family detached units, all of which are permitted. The uses proposed for the LMN District includes a limited retail (as part of a neighborhood center), multifamily, single family attached, and single family detached residential, which are all permitted. The uses proposed for the UE District include an 8 to 10 acre public park and clustered single family detached residential, and open space associated with the clustering of the UE housing. All district standards in Article 4 of the LUC have been complied with. The "block requirements" within the MMN zoning district have been satisfied to the extent applicable at the ODP review stage. As required, all general development standards in Article 3 of the LUC have been complied with at the level of detail required for an ODP submittal. The ODP Submittal Requirements handout (see attached) specifies the level of detail required for an ODP submittal. B. Section 2.3.2 (11-11)(2) — Residential Densities This review criterion requires an ODP located within the LMN and MMN zoning districts to be consistent with the residential density ranges of those districts. The LMN zoning district requires a minimum overall average density of 5 dwelling units/net acre of residential land, and a maximum overall average density of 8 dwelling units/gross acre of residential land. There are a minimum of 470 and a maximum of 752 units proposed on 93.92 acres of LMN property. This equates to a minimum proposed density of 5.0 units per acre and a maximum proposed density of 8.0 units per acre. The LMN density standards are therefore satisfied. The MMN zoning district requires a minimum overall average density of 12 dwelling units per net acre. There is no maximum residential density specified for the MMN zone. There are a minimum of 308 and a maximum of 386 units spec on 5.7 acres of MMN property. This equates to a minimum proposed density f 11. 8 u its per acre and a maximum proposed density of 15.02 units per acre. T e nsity standards are therefore satisfied. C. Section 2.3.2 (1-11)(3) — Contiguity Requirements of the Compact Urban Growth Standards This criterion requires an ODP to conform to the contiguity requirements of the Compact Urban Growth Standards. This requires that at least 1/6 of the proposed development `s boundaries must be contiguous to existing urban development within i Johnson Property, Overall Development Plan, #32-01A February 21, 2002 P & Z Hearing Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background: The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: W: T; Vacant Industrial Building (former pipe plant), I; Existing Industrial Uses, SW: RL; Meadows East Residential Neighborhood, S: T; Existing Farm Land, Cargil Seed Research Farm, Drake Road NC; Undeveloped Neighborhood Commercial Center of Rigden Farm, MMN; Undeveloped Multifamily property in Rigden Farm, LMN; Approved Rigden Farm Filings 1 through 7, under construction (6th and 7th filings are in final compliance review), NE: I; Prospect Industrial Park, Sharp Point Drive, Midpoint Drive, E; Prospect Business Park, Midpoint Drive, Larimer County Detention Center. The property was annexed in November 1997 as part of the Timberline Annexation and was originally zoned T — Transition. A request to amend the Structure Plan and rezone the property to I, UE, LMN, and MMN was approved on 2nd reading by City Council on November 20, 2001. 2. Land Use Code Section 2.3.2 (H) of the Land Use Code identifies eight possible criteria for reviewing Overall Development Plans. A. Section 2.3.2 (H)(1) — Permitted Uses and District Standards This section requires the ODP to be consistent with the permitted uses and applicable Article 4 standards of all zone districts contained within the boundaries of the ODP and to be consistent with any applicable general development standards contained within Article 3. It also requires that if there is any land in the MMN zoning district that the plan be consistent with the block size requirements for that district. The site has four zoning districts: Industrial, I; Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood District, M-N-M; Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood District, L-M-N; and Urban Estate U-E. The uses proposed for the Industrial District include offices, financial services, clinics, mixed -use dwelling units, artisan/photography galleries or studios, plant nurseries, veterinary facilities and small animal clinics, bed and breakfast, child care center, equipment rental without outdoor storage, recreational uses. The uses proposed for the MMN District include multifamily dwelling units, single-family t� r I ITEM NO. F MEETING DATE 2/21/02 STAFF Troy Jones Citv of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Johnson Property, Overall Development Plan, #32-01A APPLICANT: Jim Postle 2919 Valmont Rd., Suite 204 \kt �04u Boulder, CO 80301 OWNERS: Spring Creek Farms, LLP nn Contact — Glenn Johnson,YQ 3432 Carlton Ave. / �O Fort Collins, CO 80525 �C PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for an Overall Development Plan for a 217 acre mixed -use development on the property of the recent Johnson Property Rezone, file # 32-01. The applicant proposes between 980 and 1.359 dwelling units in single family and multi- family configurations. The application also includes the adaptive reuse of the historic Jessup Farm historic farmstead, a 10 acre city park, and limited commercial uses as part of a neighborhood center. The site is bound by Timberline Road to the west, Drake Road to the south, and the Great Western Railroad tracks to the northeast. The site has four zoning districts: Industrial District, I, Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood District, M-M-N; Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood District, L-M-N; and Urban Estate District, U-E. RECOMMENDATION: Approval WAX011j11y1=WilluIky,001YA This ODP is evaluated by the criteria contained in the Land Use Code. The land uses proposed on the ODP within each of the four zoning districts are permitted on their proposed locations in accordance with the permitted use standards set forth in Section 4 of the Land Use Code. The ODP complies with all applicable standards of the Land Use Code. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box580 Fort Collins, CO80522-0580 (970)221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT