The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSIDEHILL, FILING ONE - FDP - 32-01C - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS (3)Number:295 Created:9/12/2003 [9/12/2003] Please explain why the sub -drain travels the distance it does off -site. The sub -drain just needs to be higher then the 100-year WSEL at the location where it discharges into the swale. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number:290 Created:9/10/2003 [9/10/2003] Please contact Bob Zakely to discuss the plan (phone call). Please refer to J.R. Engineering's response letter for this comment Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number:278 Created:9/5/2003 [9/5/2003] There are still several locations where the proposed trees are in conflict with the proposed water mains or services. Please adjust trees or water lines to avoid these conflicts. See Site, Landscape and Utility plans for other comments. All tree separations have been adjusted per a meeting between Joe Carter of Cityscape and Jeff Hill on Thursday October 2, 2003. Notes have been changed within the Landscape Notes section per Jeff Hill's request. Topic: Utility plans Number:206 Created:4/16/2003 [4/16/2003] As previously indicated; the existing sanitary sewer in Drake Road has limited capacity available. Some of the sewers included in Rigden Farm 6th Filing are needed to provide relief capacity for the sewer in Drake. If the Side Hill project proceeds before Rigden 6th filing, Side Hill will be responsible for constructing the needed sewers. Please refer to J.R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. This concludes the response to comments. Please call with any questions regarding this submittal. Thank you, 4 e Carter ityscape Urban Design Page 7 Number:292 Created:9/11/2003 [9/11/2003] Provide a signature block for the ditch company on any sheet that effects their ditch (including the cover sheet). Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:298 Created: 9/15/2003 [9/15/2003] Sheet 15 - matchline missing. Sheet.16 - where does the underdrain go on the profile? Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:299 Created: 9/15/2003 [9/15/2003] Offsite Underdrain System - see page 7 of the subsurface report. It appears that the underdrain system's outfall is below the 100 year storm. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:300 Created: 9/15/2003 (9/15/2003] Sheet 31, 33, 34, 35, 36 - Please label the slope ratios (4:1 max allowed) Please refer to J.R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Department: Excel Energy Issue Contact: Len Hilderbrand Topic: General Number:271 Created:6/18/2003 [9/8/2003 Same comments, same redlines. [6/18/2003] No further comments. Same comments still apply. So noted. Thank you. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Monica Moore Topic: General Number:277 Created:9/3/2003 [9/3/2003] No comments So noted. Thank you. Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lama rque Topic: Drainage Number:291 Created:9/11/2003 [9/11/2003] Please provide documentation on how the size of the orifice plate was determined without running extran first. See tab in drainage report. If previous analysis from prior submittal was used as a first iteration, then please include this information in this report and explain more clearly the methodology in the text. If you have any questions, please call Sue Paquette at 221-7214. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:294 Created:9/12/2003 [9/12/2003] The easement, which acts as the outfall for the site and where the off -site sub -drain is located, needs to be obtained before the approval and signing of the. Side Hill mylars. So noted. Thank you. The applicant is working to obtain the necessary easements. Page 6 Topic: Utility plans Number:119 Created:l/3/2003 [9/9/3] Repeat until documents received. [6/11/3] The legals have been received but you will need either a Letter of Intent from the individual property owners stating that they will grant the easements or the actual recorded easement document itself before you can go to hearing. [4/18/3] Your response is acknowledged. Item remains open. [1/3/2003] Incomplete or incorrect ROW, property lines and easements shown. Please provide and label with dimensions and labels. Please provide all off -site ROW or easements by plat or separate document. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number 126 Created:l/3/2003 [9/10/3] Sheet 49 - show the irrigation line crossing under Windrow. Keep in mind that it must have at least 2' from bottem of scarified subgrade. The pipe itself must be constructed with watertight joints (like a C900 or RCP R4 joint). [1/3/03] Show all utility crossings on plan and profile. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:283 Created: 9/9/2003 [9/9/2003] Sheet 9 - The shaded areas are too dark and will not scan. Would a light hatching work a little better? This comment applies to other sheets as well. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:284 Created: 9/9/2003 [9/9/2003] Sheet 23, 24 and 25 - Correct the overlapped labeling. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:286 Created: 9/9/2003 [9/9/2003] Sheet 47 - scanning problems. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:287 Created: 9/9/2003 [9/9/2003] Sheet 49, 50, 52, 53, 54 - correct overlapped labeling. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:288 Created: 9/9/2003 [9/9/2003] Sheet 51 - scanning problems, overlapped labeling. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:289 Created: 9/9/2003 [9/9/2003] Please see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Page 5 Number:86 Created:113/2003 [9/9/3] There appears to be a low spot in the intersection detail - see redlines, sheet 53. [6/11/3] The spot elevations are overlapped in some of the intersections details and I couldn't read/review them. Other details appear to have a low spot. Please see redlines. [4/18/3] Please make the intersection details a little larger so that I can read the spot elevations better. Thanks very much! [1/3/2003] Provide intersection details per 7-27, 7-28 and 3.3.4. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Topic: Plat Number:280 Created: 9/9/2003 [9/9/2003] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal do not close. See printout included. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:281 Created: 9/9/2003 [9/9/2003] From Technical Services: Street names need to be approved by PFA. Street does not meet requirements for a Boulevard. Joe Carter from Cityscape met with Troy Jones and Ron Gonzales regarding street names. PFA requested that the northwestern % of Iowa Drive be renamed because it changes direction. The applicant proposes this % of street be named Katandin Drive. PFA also has issues with the naming the primary collector throughout the development Nancy Gray Boulevard. The PFA maintains that the street does not qualify as a boulevard but rather an avenue. Cityscape has submitted a plan showing median widths and lengths per a request by Ted Shepard. Ted intends to take this plan to PFA to discuss the possibility of using the suffix boulevard" At time of the submittal, the plans do not reflect a final decision on the suffix of this collector. Prior to the submission of my/ars, a suffix will be determined and shown on all plan sets. Topic: Stormline Profiles Number:301 Created:9/16/2003 [9/16/2003] Please use ductile iron pipe in the ROW ( instead of the RCP currently shown) where the concrete encasement does not meet the minimum cover requirements (2' below scarified subgrade). Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Topic: Street Names Number:106 Created: 1/3/2003 [9/9/3] Repeat comment. See comment under "Plat" regarding street names as well. [6/11/3] Repeat comment. Have the street names been approved by the appropriate city departments/agencies? [4/18/3] Repeat comment. [1/3/2003] Please refer to Chapter 13 of LCUASS for street naming requirements. Please refer to the response to comment #281 Page 4 or by private development, or the City has appropriated a Capital Project to construct the required improvements. So noted. Thank you. Number:51 Created: 1/3/2003 [4/18/3,6/11/3, 9/9/3] Your response is acknowledged. This item will remain open. [1/3/2003] The actual ROW required along Timberline is unknown until the ultimate design of Timberline is complete. So noted. Thank you. Number:54 Created:1/3/2003 [9/9131 The estimate for Share Pointe has been received and forwarded to Street Oversizing for their review. Comments to follow. [6/11/3] Please provide an engineer's estimate for the cost of the Sharp Pointe connection for the City's review. See above. [4/18/3] Item still open. Please provide 500' of off -site design or as far as necessary to show that the design will work with existing. It was determined in a meeting with JR Engineering that the cross sections asked for above were not necessary. [1/3/2003] This project is responsible for the ultimate design of the Sharp Point connection. To insure that future street improvements will meet City Standards, the centerline flowline, and cross sections of all streets (Sharp Point connection and all stubbed out streets) shall be continued for 500 feet beyond construction or as far as necessary to show that the design will work. Please provide an engineer's estimate for the cost of the Sharp Point connection for the City's review. Once the final cost has been approved by the City, it shall be included in the Development Agreement and a portion collected over each phase to assure that this connection is made in the future. So noted. Thank you. Topic: Landscape Plan Number:239 Created:6/13/2003 [9/9/3] Repeat comment. [6/13/20031 Correction required to note 23. See redlines. The note has been amended per a meeting between Joe Carter of Cityscape and Susan Joy on Tuesday September 23, 2003. Number:279 Created:9/9/2003 [9/9/2003] See comment #278 from Jeff Hill/Water Wastewater. So noted. Thank you. Please see response to comment number 278 below. Topic: Plan and Profiles Number:80 Created: 1/3/2003 [9/9/3] The ultimate is shown clearly and a note for tying into the EOP is shown, but it is not clear what will be built in the interim. Are you proposing a temporary asphalt patch from the curb return to the existing Timberline road? If so, please show. [1/3/2003] Show how the streets will tie into the interim and ultimate Timberline design. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment Page 3 Number:305 Created:9/16/2003 Please re -submit paper copies of the following items: 6 site plans; 6 plats; 6 landscape plans; 6 utility plan sets; 1 drainage report; 6 response to comment letters from both JR Engineering and Cityscape; all easements; and the Timberline design. The requested plans and copies have been included in the submittal package. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Easements Number:245 Created:6/13/2003 [9/9/3] Repeat comment. The mylars cannot be approved until the recorded off -site easements are received. [6/13/2003] The legal descriptions for the off -site drainage easements have been received. In order for this project to go to public hearing, either the copies of the recorded easement itself must be submitted OR at the very minimum, signed Letters of Intent from the property owners stating that they will sign the easements must be submitted. So noted. Thank you. Topic: General Number:50. Created:1/3/2003 [9/9/3] This issue continues to remain open until the ultimate and interim design for Timberline has been received. An internal meeting was held on 9/11/3 and it was determined that this development is still responsible for the interim and ultimate design for Timberline along its frontage plus a 1000' of preliminary design north of their northernmost boundary. In no case will any building permits be issued until the Adequate Public Facilities requirements have been met for this development. [4/18/3, 6/11/3] Your response is acknowledged. This item will remain open until the interim and ultimate design for Timberline is submitted. [1/3/2003] The following is a summary of the conclusions reached at the City's Transportation Coordination meeting on Thursday, December 19, 2002: Sidehill is responsible for the full design of Timberline along the property frontage. Timberline also needs to be designed offsite to the north through the intersection at Prospect, showing the horizontal and vertical alignment, the centerline profile of Timberline, and any further information needed to verify that the design will work to City Standards. This design should maintain the current elevation of the railroad tracks and, if possible, should accommodate any trees that the City Forester requires to be maintained. In addition, it is anticipated that the proposed roadway coming into the crest of the hill will be 3 to 5 feet lower then the existing elevation. The redesign of the Prospect/Timberline intersection will need to be included as well, holding the east curb line in its current location. It is highly encouraged that the engineers from Sidehill coordinate with the engineers of the Mansion Park development directly across Timberline for the design of Timberline, and Development Review Engineering will schedule a meeting to facilitate this coordination. The PDP for Sidehill may be approved with conditions pertaining to the APF issues by the Planning and Zoning Board /or Hearing Officer after the above designs have been completed, However, the Final Compliance will not be approved and plans signed off , nor will a Development Agreement be started, or filing of the plat will occur until the APF issues at the Timberline -Prospect intersection have been solved by the design and construction of improvements to the intersection either by the City Page 2 October 28, 2003 Troy Jones City of Fort Collins Community Planning and P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Environmental Services RE: SideHill — Final Compliance Plans Dear Troy: M 0 Y, @@P)@ urban design, inc. 3555 stanford road, suite 105 fort collins, colorado 80525 (970)226-4074 fax (970) 226-4196 e@cityscapeud.com Included below are the comments received from City Staff regarding the first round of Final Compliance Plans for SideHill. An explanation (in italics) of how issues have been addressed follows each comment. The redlined drawings provided to the applicant have been included in this resubmitted set. ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Troy Jones Topic: General Number:273 Created:6/18/2003 [9/16/2003] Take the word "typical" out of the note explaining the shaded driveway areas, and add another sentence to the note that reads "Any variation of driveway location can only be approved by the City Engineer. [6/18/2003] On page 3 of 6 on the plat, add to the note explaining the shaded areas that "these driveway locations shall not be varied." Please clarify this in.the general notes on sheet 4 of 15 also. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:302 Created:9/16/2003 [9/16/20031 The City Clerk does not sign the plat. Take off the City Clerk signature line from page 1 of the plat. Please refer to J. R. Engineering's response letter for this comment. Number:303 Created:9/16/2003 [9/16/20031 The lighting plan is now satisfying both Current Planning and Police Services. So noted. Thank you. Number:304 Created:9/16/2003 [9/1612003] As stated previously, the Adequate Public Facilities requirement triggers the need for improvements to the Prospect and Timberline intersection. On Tuesday, Sep. 2, 2003 the City Council chose not to put on the November ballot, the redirecting of funds from other road projects to these intersection improvements. City Attorney staff has advised Current Planning staff that a condition MUST be placed on the Final Compliance approval for this project requiring improvements to the Prospect Road and Timberline Road intersection. This condition will be a formal letter from the City to the applicant, and will also be reflected in the Development Agreement. So noted. Thank you. Page 1