HomeMy WebLinkAboutSIDEHILL, FILING ONE - FDP - 32-01C - CORRESPONDENCE - (4)[9/8/2003 Same comments, same redlines.
[6118120031 No further comments. Same comments still apply.
Department: Light & Power
Topic: General
Number: 277
(9/3/2003) No comments
Department: Stormwater Utility
Topic: Drainage
Issue Contact: Monica Moore
Created: 9/3/2003
Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Number: 291 Created: 9/11 /2003
(9/11 /2003) Please provide documentation on how the size of the orifice plate was determined without
running extran first. See tab in drainage report. If previous analysis from prior submittal was used as a first
iteration, then please include this information in this report and explain more clearly the methodology in the
text. If you have any questions, please call Sue Paquette at 221-7214.
Number: 294 Created: 9/12/2003
(9/12/2003) The easement, which acts as the outfoll for the site and where the off -site sub -drain is located,
needs to be obtained before the approval and signing of the Side Hill mylars.
Number: 295 Created: 9/12/2003
(9/12/2003) Please explain why the sub -drain travels the distance it does off -site. The sub -drain just needs to
be higher then the 100-year WSEL at the location where it discharges into the swale.
Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control
Number: 290 Created: 9/10/2003
[9/10/2003] Please contact Bob Zakely to discuss the plan (phone call).
Department: Water Wastewater
Topic: General
Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Number: 278 Created: 9/5/2003
(9/5/2003) There are still several locations where the proposed trees are in conflict with the proposed water
mains or services. Please adjust trees or water lines to avoid these conflicts.
See Site, Landscape and Utility plans for other comments.
Topic: Utility plans
Number: 206 Created: 4/16/2003
(4/16/2003) As previously indicated; the existing sanitary sewer in Drake Road has limited capacity available.
Some of the sewers included in Rigden Farm 6th Filing are needed to provide relief capacity for the sewer in
Drake. If the Side Hill project proceeds before Rigden 6th filing, Side Hill will be responsible for constructing
the needed sewers.
Redlines and hard copies are on the Current Planning pick up counter ready for your
consultants to pick up. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
ple se feel free o call me at (970) 221-6750.
Y urs Trly,
,I U
l rqy Jo es
City P nner
Page 5
Topic: Utility plans
Number: 119
(9/9/3) Repeat until documents received.
Created: 1 /3/2003
(611113) The legols have been received but you will need either a Letter of Intent from the individual property
owners stating that they will grant the easements or the actual recorded easement document itself before
you can go to hearing.
(411813) Your response is acknowledged. Item remains open.
(11312003) Incomplete or incorrect ROW, property lines and easements shown. Please provide and label
with dimensions and labels. Please provide all off -site ROW or easements by plat or separate document.
Number: 126 Created: 1 /3/2003
(9/ 10/3) Sheet 49 - show the irrigation line crossing under Windrow. Keep in mind that it must have at least 2'
from bottem of scarified subgrade. The pipe itself must be constructed with watertight joints (like a C900 or
RCP R4 joint).
(713103) Show all utility crossings on plan and profile
Number: 283 Created: 9/9/2003
(9/9/2003) Sheet 9 -The shaded areas are too dark and will not scan. Would alight hatching work a little
better? This comment applies to other sheets as well.
Number: 284 Created: 9/9/2003
(9/9/2003) Sheet 23, 24 and 25 - Correct the overlapped labeling.
Number: 286 Created: 9/9/2003
(9/9/2003) Sheet 47 - scanning problems.
Number: 287 Created: 9/9/2003
(9/9/2003) Sheet 49, 50, 52, 53, 54 - correct overlapped labeling.
Number: 288 Created: 9/9/2003
(9/9/2003) Sheet 51 - scanning problems, overlapped labeling.
Number: 289 Created: 9/9/2003
(9/9/2003) Please see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements.
Number: 292 Created: 9/11/2003
(9/11/2003) Provide a signature block for the ditch company on any sheet that effects their ditch (including
the cover sheet).
Number: 298 Created: 9/15/2003
(9/15/2003) Sheet 15 - matchline missing. Sheet 16 - where does the underdrain go on the profile?
Number: 299 Created: 9/15/2003
(9/15/2003) Offsite Underdrain System - see page 7 of the subsurface report. It appears that the urderdrain
system's outfoll is below the 100 year storm.
Number: 300 Created: 9/15/2003
(9/15/2003) Sheet 31, 33, 34, 35, 36 - Please label the slope ratios (4:1 max allowed)
Department: Excel Energy Issue Contact: Len Hilderbrand
Topic: General
Number: 271 Created: 6/18/2003
Page 4
be included in the Development Agreement and a portion collected over each phase to assure that this
connection is made in the future.
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 239 Created: 6/13/2003
(9/9/3) Repeat comment.
(611312003) Correction required to note 23. See redlines.
Number: 279 Created: 9/9/2003
(9/9/2003) See comment #278 from Jeff Hill/Water Wastewater.
Topic: Plan and Profiles
Number: 80 Created: 1 /3/2003
(9/9/3) The ultimate is shown clearly and a note for tieing into the EOP is shown, but it is not clear what will be
built in the interim. Are you proposing a temporary asphalt patch from the curb return to the existing
Timberline road? If so, please show.
(11312003) Show how the streets will tie into the interim and ultimate Timberline design
Number: 86 Created: 1 /3/2003
(9/9/3) There appears to be a low spot in the intersection detail - see redlines, sheet 53.
(6111/3) The spot elevations are overlapped in some of the intersections details and I couldn t read/review
them. Other details appear to have a low spot. Please see redlines.
(411813) Please make the intersection details a little larger so that I can read the spot elevations better.
Thanks very much!
(11312003) Provide intersection details per 7-27, 7-28 and 3.3.4.
Topic: Plat
Number: 280 Created: 9/9/2003
(9/9/2003) From Technical Services: Boundary and legal do not close. See printout included.
Number: 281 Created: 9/9/2003
(9/9/2003) From Technical Services: Street names need to be approved by PFA. Street does not meet
requirements for a Boulevard.
Topic: Stormline Profiles
Number: 301 Created: 9/16/2003
(9/16/2003) Please use ductile iron pipe in the ROW ( instead of the RCP currently shown) where the
concrete encasement does not meet the minimum cover requirements (2' below scarified subgrade).
Topic: Street Names
Number: 106 Created: 1 /3/2003
(9/9/3) Repeat comment. See comment under "Plat" regarding street names as well.
(6/11/3) Repeat comment. Have the street names been approved by the appropriate city
departments/ogencies?
(411813) Repeat comment.
(11312003) Please refer to Chapter 13 of LCUASS for street naming requirements.
Paae 3
Topic: General
Number: 50 Created: 1 /3/2003
(9/9/3) This issue continues to remain open until the ultimate and interim design for Timberline has been
received. An internal meeting was held on 9/11/3 and it was determined that this development is still
responsible for the interim and ultimate design for Timberline along its frontage plus a 1000' of preliminary
design north of their northernmost boundary. In no case will any building permits be issued until the
Adequate.Public Facilities requirements have been met for this development.
(411813, 611113) Your response is acknowledged. This item will remain open until the interim and ultimate
design for Timberline is submitted.
(11312003) The following is a summary of the conclusions reached at the City's Transportation Coordination
meeting on Thursday, December 79, 2002:
Sidehill is responsible for the full design of Timberline along the property frontage.
Timberline also needs to be designed ofisite to the north through the intersection at Prospect, showing the
horizontal and vertical alignment, the centerline profile of Timberline, and any further information needed to
verify that the design will work to City Standards. This design should maintain the current elevation of the
railroad tracks and, if possible, should accommodate any frees that the City Forester requires to be
maintained. In addition, it is anticipated that the proposed roadway coming into the crest of the hill will be 3
to 5 feet lower then the existing elevation.
The redesign of the Prospect/Timberline intersection will need to be included as well, holding the east curb
line in its current location.
It is highly encouraged that the engineers from Sidehill coordinate with the engineers of the Mansion Park
development directly across Timberline for the design of Timberline, and Development Review Engineering
will schedule a meeting to facilitate this coordination.
The PDP for Sidehill may be approved with conditions pertaining to the APF issues by the Planning and Zoning
Board /or Hearing Officer after the above designs have been completed, However, the Final Compliance
will not be approved and plans signed off, nor will a Development Agreement be started, or filing of the plat
will occur until the APF issues at the Timberline -Prospect intersection have been solved by the design and
construction of improvements to the intersection either by the City or by private development, or the City has
appropriated a Capital Project to construct the required improvements.
Number: 51 Created: 1 /3/2003
(411813,611113, 9/9/3) Your response is acknowledged. This item will remain open.
(1/312003) The actual ROW required along Timberline is unknown until the ultimate design of Timberline is
complete.
Number: 54 Created: 1 /3/2003
(9/9/3) The estimate for Share Pointe has been received and forwarded to Street Oversizing for their review.
Comments to follow.
(6/1 1/3) Please provide an engineer's estimate for the cost of the Sharp Pointe connection for the City's
review. See above.
(4/ 18/3) Item still open. Please provide 500' of off -site design or as for as necessary to show that the design
will work with existing. It was determined in a meeting with JR Engineering that the cross sections asked for
above were not necessary.
(11312003) This project is responsible for the ultimate design of the Sharp Point connection. To insure that
future street improvements will meet City Standards, the centerline flow/ine, and cross sections of all streets
(Sharp Point connection and all stubbed out streets) shall be continued for 500 feet beyond construction or
as for as necessary to show that the design will work. Please provide an engineer's estimate for the cost of
the Sharp Point connection for the City's review. Once the final cost has been approved by the City, it shall
Page 2
ZINC,a STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
Citvof Fort Collins
�s
John Beauparlant, AICP Date: 09/16/2003
Entitlement Manager
JamesCompany
2919 Valmont Road, Suite 204
Boulder, Colorado 80301
Staff has reviewed your submittal for SIDE HILL FILING ONE PDP & FINAL COMPLIANCE
- TYPE I (LUC) #32-01 B&C, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Troy Jones
Topic: General
Number: 273 Created: 6/18/2003
(9/16/2003) Take the word "typical" out of the note explaining the shaded driveway areas, and add another
sentence to the note that reads "Any variation of driveway location can only be approved by the City
Engineer.
(617812003) On page 3 of 6 on the plat, add to the note explaining the shaded areas that "these driveway
locations shall not be varied." Please clarify this in the general notes on sheet 4 of 15 also.
Number: 302 Created: 9/16/2003
(9/16/2003) The City Clerk does not sign the plat. Take off the City Clerk signature line from page 1 of the
plat.
Number: 303 Created: 9/16/2003
(9/16/2003) The lighting plan is now satisfying both Current Planning and Police Services.
Number: 304 Created: 9/16/2003
(9/16/2003) As stated previously, the Adequate Public Facilities requirement triggers the need for
improvements to the Prospect and Timberline intersection. On Tuesday, Sep, 2, 2003 the City Council chose
not to put on the November ballot, the redirecting of funds from other road projects to these intersection
improvements. City Attorney staff has advised Current Planning staff that a condition MUST be placed on the
Final Compliance approval for this project requiring improvements to the Prospect Road and Timberline Road
intersection. This condition will be a formal letter from the City to the applicant, and will also be reflected in
the Development Agreement.
Number: 305 Created: 9/16/2003
Please re -submit paper copies of the following items: 6 site plans; 6 plats; 6 landscape plans; 6 utility plan sets;
1 drainage report; 6 response to comment letters from both JR Engineering and Cityscape; all easements;
and the Timberline design.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: Easements
Number: 245 Created: 6/13/2003
(9/9/3) Repeat comment. The mylars cannot be approved until the recorded off -site easements are
received.
(611312003) The legal descriptions for the off -site drainage easements have been received. In order for this
project to go to public hearing, either the copies of the recorded easement itself must be submitted OR at
the very minimum, signed Letters of Intent from the property owners stating that they will sign the easements
must be submitted.
Page I