The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSIDEHILL, FILING ONE - PDP - 32-01B - CORRESPONDENCE - (7)Project: �t�-WuDate: zlicis Planner: %—)00-1 46 Traffic Operations: Engineer: J"' Items Requested Redlined Items Being Returned 0 1O m 0 Other Items Required Y Ln � a � ED m " 'in 0 Other Items being Returned Engineering eWYKArfVJ Storm_water 1 1 1 t t Water Wastewater, Traffic Operations Trans ortation Planning Transfort Natural Resources 1 1 I 1 Park Planning TOTALS ti t Other: Note: All redlined items should be returned with the resubmittal/revisions. REVISION ROUTING SHEET ITEM: gv" Z .Z < U_ Z ZO p ...poZ Z ` z Z u _�DATERECEIVED: FILE: PROJECT PLANNER x x x x x ENGINEERING PAVEMENT ZONING BUILDING INSPECTION LIGHT & POWER TECHNICAL SERVICES FORESTRY WATER & WASTEWATER/FCLD PFA POLICE — L ADVANCE PLANNING STREETS R.O.W. PLANNING WATER CONSERVATION POST OFFICE US WEST PUBLIC SERVICE —; e X X I X SCHOOLS: POUDRE / THOMPSO AT & T DIGITAL CABLE CDOT DITCH COMPANY RAILROAD: UP or BNSF REA/DOE/PRPA 5-1b44*1 3 L I Z I I r� II t l I i zi Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any uestions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, ease feel fre o call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, ToyJc /s City Planner Page 9 3. Please schedule a meeting with Bob Zakely to discuss this plan. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: General Number: 180 Created: 2/12/2003 Work closely with the Shops at Rigden Farm development proposal to the south in order to properly align the pedestrian crossing / refuge and access ramps at the Drake / Illinois intersection. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Plat Number: 260 Created: 6/16/2003 Will the offsite sewer be in R.O.W. or easement? Both have been discussed; therefore, please clarify. Topic: Utility plans Number: 259 Created: 6/16/2003 What is the 100-year water surface elevation at the outlet of the underdrairi? Is this area a channel, pond, river, ???? Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: Utility plans Number: 31 Created: 12/30/2002 As previously indicated, clearly define all water and sewer service sizes on the overall utility plans. Provide fixture count information for the proposed multi -family buildings for our review. Number: 38 Created: 12/30/2002 Provide utility easements for proposed water and sanitary sewers in future road ways. Number: 39 Created: 12/30/2002 6/12/03 4/14/03 If all the irrigation ditches are to be abandoned, then will irrigation taps be required on the domestic water mains. Show and label any and all proposed irrigation service on the utility plans. Number: 206 Created: 4/16/2003 The existing sanitary sewer in Drake Road has limited capacity available. Some of the sewers included in Rigden Farm 6th Filing are needed to provide relief capacity for the sewer in Drake. If the Side Hill project proceeds before Rigden 6th filing, Side Hill will be responsible for constructing the needed sewers. See Site, Landscape and Utility plans for other comments. Number: 256 Created: 6/16/2003 Fire hydrants may not be located in lowered section of the water mains. Relocate the fire hydrant at the end of HayMeadow Way or lower storm sewer. Number: 257 Created: 6/16/2003 AS previously indicated relocate the proposed fire hydrant or the proposed drive between lots 4 and 5. Maintain 10 feet of separation between fire hydrants and all drive ways. Number: 258 Created: 6/16/2003 As previously indicated, raise or lower storm sewers where possible to avoid water main lowerings. Page 8 Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Monica Moore Topic: General Number: 234 Created: 5/29/2003 Lot 1 - Iowa Drive The driveway is located over the electric service. The electric service is not to be located under a driveway. Number: 235 Created: 5/29/2003 Electric service to Building G does not maintain minimum clearance of 10-feet from the water service to Building F. Number: 236 Created: 5/29/2003 Developer needs to provide a detail drawing showing the building walls and the distances between gas meters and electric meters located on these walls demonstrating that gas meters and electric meters will be able to maintain the minimum distances required. Number: 237 Created: 5/29/2003 Electric meters will be required to be located on the same side of the building as the service stub. Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Topic: General Number: 238 Created: 6/12/2003 Lighting: Lighting falls below minimum of 0.5fc throughout parking lot areas and adjacent to building entrance points. Also, lighting at driveway/sidewalk intersections falls below 1.0fc needed to mitigate potential pedestrian/cycle/auto conflicts. Department:. Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 261 Created: 6/17/2003 Second Submittal of Extran analysis for Sidehill Filing One Drainage Report comments 1. SWMM subbasin input and percent imperviousness does not agree with MODSWMM data table information in the report appendix, particularly subbasins 108 and 109. Also, percent imperviousness should be no less than 5 percent for subbasin 109. 2. Pertaining to the Extran schematic and input, where is the input for junction 101 and conduit 201, which are both shown on the schematic? Also, where are 90010, 90011, and 90012, which are also shown on the schematic but not in the Extran output? 3. Pertaining to Extran output, please explain the warning statements on page 4 of 19 for junctions 505 and 326,'Warning ! ! I Junction ... is not associated with any conduit." Also, on page 4 of 19, please explain why the crown elevation equals the invert elevation for junctions 505 and 326. 4. Please verify the invert of pond B - Extran junction 532 - with the drawing set; the invert on the drawing set did not appear to agree with the Extran input. 5. Please include in the appendix an outline/discussion of how and where (with sample calculations) the Extran output was extracted to develop the SWMM pond 560 rating curve. The information currently in the appendix is difficult to follow and verify, and it does not appear to agree with the SWMM input. Also, the final SWMM output (with the Extran developed rating curve for the ponds) should closely agree with the Extran output - pond volumes, elevations, and discharges. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 265 Created: 6/18/2003 1. The plans contain no notes indicating the ponds are to be utilized as sediment traps. 2. Some notes relating to sediment and erosion control are not with others. Page 7 4/18/3: Still missing details as listed above. The CDOT detail is no longer required, however, as the city has determined that we will be using our standard detail until further notice. 6/13/3: Looks great! But still need detail 707 and details) D10-D13 for the sidewalk chases. Also, remove detail 709 because even though it's in LCUASS, it's not correct. They are supposed To be taking that one out - sorry for the confusion! Number: 231 Created: 4/21 /2003 See redlines for other comments. Number: 248 Created: 6/13/2003 Sheet 12 - Please show the matchline referenced on sheet 57. Number: 249 Created: 6/13/2003 Sheet 13 - Who is designing and installing the retaining wall shown? If this wall needs to be there to accommodate this project's grading than it will need to be designed and constructed with this project (add the appropriate details to The detail sheet). Number: 250 Created: 6/13/2003 Sheet 25 - What is the hatching for? Please correct the overlapped spot elevation. Number: 251 Sheet 48 - Correct some overlapping labeling. Created: 6/13/2003 Number: 252 Created: 6/13/2003 Plan and Profiles - Show elevation and location of all proposed utilities. Number: 253 Created: 6/13/2003 Sheet 51 through 54 - Overlapping labeling, illegible spots. Number: 254 Created: 6/13/2003 Where ever a street cut is shown, provide hatched areas for the approximate area. Street cuts must be shown to the middle of the drive lane or the center of the street depending on the circumstance. See sheet 51 for example. Number: 255 Created: 6/13/2003 Sheer 58 - Temp access road Typical section: Please show which way the crown goes and what depth and material the road consists of. Topic: Variances Number: 247 Created: 6/13/2003 Your variance request To reduce the centerline radius for a portion of Sidehill Blvd was received. Engineering is inclined to approve this request based on the logic presented within the request with one small change to the variance request itself. Please resubmit the letter so that the second to the last paragraph does not include the word "anticipated". Restate the sentence so that there is no doubt that there will be any problems and the City can approve the request. This can be resubmitted at any time and does not need to wait until the next submittal. Once received, we can process this request within a couple of hours. This will need to be done before going to hearing. Please call me if you have any questions! Thanks! Department: Excel Energy Topic: General Number: 271 No further comments. Same comments still apply. Issue Contact: Len Hilderbrand Created: 6/18/2003 Page 6 6/11/3: The plat pages have been numbered separately as requested, however, the utility sheets need to be renumbered to reflect the correct number of total pages. See redlines. Number: 113 Created: 1 /3/2003 Line 41 and 48 of the General Notes require corrections. 4/18/3: Lines 47 and 48 require corrections. 5/9/3: Repeat comment. See redlines. Number: 116 Created: 1 /3/2003 Provide all typical street sections for each street type proposed. Sections include appropriate horizontal and vertical dimensions and cross slopes. List each street in the development under the appropriate street type. 4/18/3: Repeat comment. Please see John Loffon for further explanation. 6/11/3: Please identify E/N/S/W on the typical street details. Number: 119 Created: 1 /3/2003 Incomplete or incorrect ROW, property lines and easements shown. Please provide and label with dimensions and labels. Please provide all off -site ROW or easements by plat or separate document. 4/18/3: Your response is acknowledged. Item remains open. 6/11/3: The legals have been received but you will need either a Letter of Intent from the individual property owners stating that they will grant the easements or the actual recorded easement document itself before you can go to hearing. Number: 120 Created: 1 /3/2003 This project will need to coordinate this design with the project to the west and show enough information on this plan set so that we can determine how the streets will line up across Timberline. 4/18/3: Open item. 6/11/3: Your response is acknowledged, however, you still need to provide the information on the actual plan sets. Number: 128 Created: 1 /3/2003 All existing features must be shown for a minimum of 150' beyond the project limits. (This includes all historic structures, various buffers, etc). 6/11/3: Your response indicates that there are no buffers to show, however, the site plan shows multiple buffers in the future filings. These buffers must be shown on the grading sheets. Number: 134 Created: 1 /3/2003 Update all the old details to the new. Provide these details and any other as required by the design: 16-2 1413 703 1606 707 1607 708 D10-D13 as needed 713.1F 713.2F 1601 1602 In addition, the feds now require truncated domes on all pedestrian ramps. See attached for CDOT specifications until the City has approved spec's in LCUASS. Page 5 4/18/3: Please make the intersection details a little larger so that I can read the spot elevations better. Thanks very much! 6/11/3: The spot elevations are overlapped in some of the intersections details and I couldnY read/review them. Other details appear to have a low spot. Please see redlines. Topic: Plat Number: 93 Created: 1 /3/2003 Please provide the missing plat language as shown on the attached document (cert of dedication, maintenance guarantee, repair guarantee, notice of other docs, sight distance, etc.). See redlines and the checklist E4. 4/18/3: Repeat comment, see redlines and attached plat language. 6/9/3: Repeat comment. Corrections are still required to the plat language. Please see redlines and attached plat language document. Number: 240 Created: 6/13/2003 From Technical Services: Vicinity Map should only show what this plat is subdividing. Number: 241 Created: 6/13/2003 From Technical Services: Sheet 2 should be clear as to what is included in this subdivision. Number: 242 Created: 6/13/2003 The plat has divided the property in half and then described both boundaries. This must be corrected so that only one single outside property boundary is described. Number: 243 Created: 6/13/2003 Under Fence Restriction Notes: Add a note restricting the lots with the sight distance easements on them. Number: 244 Created: 6/13/2003 Correct the project title to match the utility plans. Number: 262 Created: 6/17/2003 Need the distance and bearings for Sidehill Blvd. The ROW must be dedicated as such. Number: 263 Created: 6/17/2003 Sheet 3 - How can these driveways be located? Use typicals or some other means to locate without cluttering the plan sheets. Number: 264 Created: 6/17/2003 Sheet 4 - Use the some note as shown on Sheet 3 for the driveway locations. Topic: Street Names Number: 106 Created: 1 /3/2003 Please refer to Chapter 13 of LCUASS for street naming requirements. 4/18/3: Repeat comment. 6/11/3: Repeat comment. Have the street names been approved by the appropriate city departments/agencies? Topic: Utility plans Number: 109 Created: 1 /3/2003 Cover Page - Correct the index, see redlines. 4/18/3: See redlines. Page 4 Number: 52 1Created: 1 /3/2003 The Drake Road design has already been completed by the Ridgen Farm development. The actual construction may either be done by that developer or through the City Street Oversizing Program in the summer of 2003. Sidehill must coordinate the plan sets so that this project will tie into the Drake Road design. Sidehill is also responsible for repaying the construction costs along their frontage of Drake Road as well as repaying the small portion of Timberline that has been built to the ultimate. 4/18/3,6/11 /3: Your response is acknowledged. This item will remain open. Number: 54 Created: 1 /3/2003 This project is responsible for the ultimate design of the Sharp Point connection. To insure that future street improvements will meet City Standards, the centerline flowline, and cross sections of all streets (Sharp Point connection and all stubbed out streets) shall be continued for 500 feet beyond construction or as for as necessary to show that the design will work. Please provide an engineer's estimate for the cost of the Sharp Point connection for the City's review. Once the final cost has been approved by the City, it shall be included in the Development Agreement and a portion collected over each phase to assure that this connection is made in the future. 4/18/3: Item still open. Please provide 500' of off -site design or as far as necessary to show that the design will work with existing. It was determined in a meeting with JR Engineering that the cross sections asked for above were not necessary. 6/11 /3: Please provide an engineer's estimate for the cost of the Sharp Pointe connection for the City's review. See above. Number: 66 Created: 1 /3/2003 Coordinate the comments given under various sections so that all of the plan sets present the same information. Number: 223 Created: 4/21 /2003 Dedicate the ROW and utility easements required for the future traffic circle. You will need to account for this in the placement of any utilities. 6/11/3: Your response is acknowledged. This item will stay open until resolved and it may be taken care of during Final Compliance Number: 267 Created: 6/18/2003 The phasing/filing needs to match the utility and plat sets. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 75 Created: 1 /3/2003 3.2.1.K requires 10 feet between trees and water or sewer lines. 4 feet between trees and gas lines. 4/18/3: Has this requirement been met in all instances? 6/13/3: An alternative compliance request has been submitted. This item will remain open until resolved. Number: 239 Created: 6/13/2003 Correction required to note 23. See redlines. Number: 266 Created: 6/18/2003 1 did not receive sheets 1-5 of the Landscape set, but make sure that the filing/phasing matches the utility and plat sets. Topic: Plan and Profiles Number: 86 Created: 1 /3/2003 Provide intersection details per 7-27, 7-28 and 3.3.4. Page 3 Number: 270 Created: 6/18/2003 The alternative compliance to "reduce the required separation distance between street trees and driveways and between street trees and utilities" is acceptable to staff. A staff recommendation of approval of this request will be forwarded to the hearing officer as part of the staff report on the project. Number: 273 Created: 6/18/2003 On page 3 of 6 on the plat, add to the note explaining the shaded areas that "these driveway locations shall not be varied." Please clarify this in the general notes on sheet 4 of 15 also. Number: 274 Created: 6/18/2003 The owner's certification signature block on the site plan shows James Construction Company as the owner, and the plat shows Spring Creek Farms as the owner. These should be the some, and if there is a lien holder, such lien holder should be listed. The owner's certification block on both the site plan and plat needs notary certification language (which was provided on the plat, but not on the site plan). Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Easements Number: 245 Created: 6/13/2003 The legal descriptions for the off -site drainage easements have been received. In order for this project to go to public hearing, either the copies of the recorded easement itself must be submitted OR at the very minimum, signed Letters of Intent from the property owners stating that they will sign the easements must be submitted. Topic: General Number: 50 Created: 1 /3/2003 The following is a summary of the conclusions reached at the City's Transportation Coordination meeting on Thursday, December 19, 2002: Sidehill is responsible for the full design of Timberline along the property frontage. Timberline also needs to be designed offsite to the north through the intersection at Prospect, showing the horizontal and vertical alignment, the centerline profile of Timberline, and any further information needed to verify that the design will work to City Standards. This design should maintain the current elevation of the railroad tracks and, if possible, should accommodate any trees that the City Forester requires to be maintained. In addition, it is anticipated that the proposed roadway coming into the crest of the hill will be 3 to 5 feet lower then the existing elevation. The redesign of the Prospect/Timberline intersection will need to be included as well, holding the east curb line in its current location. It is highly encouraged that the engineers from Sidehill coordinate with the engineers of the Mansion Park development directly across Timberline for the design of Timberline, and Development Review Engineering will schedule a meeting to facilitate this coordination. The PDP for Sidehill may be approved with conditions pertaining to the APF issues by the Planning and Zoning Board /or Hearing Officer after the above designs have been completed, However, the Final Compliance will not be approved and plans signed off , nor will a Development Agreement be started, or filing of the plat will occur until the APF issues at the Timberline -Prospect intersection have been solved by the design and construction of improvements to the intersection either by the City or by private development, or the City has appropriated a Capital Project to construct the required improvements. 4/18/3, 6/11/3: Your response is acknowledged. This item will remain open. Number: 51 Created: 1 /3/2003 The actual ROW required along Timberline is unknown until the ultimate design of Timberline is complete. 4/18/3,6/11/3: Your response is acknowledged. This item will remain open. Page 2 a. STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Cityof Fort Collins CITYSCAPE URBAN DESIGN, INC Date: 06/19/2003 ELDON WARD 3555 STANDFORD RD #105 FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for SIDE HILL FILING ONE PDP - TYPE I (LUC) #32-01 B, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: AT&T Broadband Topic: General Number: 272 No comment. Department: Current Planning Topic: General Number: 202 [6/18/03] This "FYI comment" still applies. Issue Contact: Dennis Greenwalt Created: 6/18/2003 Issue Contact: Troy Jones Created: 4/10/2003 [4/10/031 On April 8, 2003, voters did not pass the proposed transportation taxes, therefore we have no City money to improve the Prospect/Timberline intersection. The requirement of Adequate Public Facilities is therefore still a major obsticle for this project. This issue won't prevent PDP approval, however final compliance approval cannot occur until funds are allocated for the Prospect/Timberline intersection improvements. For clarification, final compliance approval is basically the administrative process of signing the mylars, recording them, recording the development agreement, and officially logging the project into the system as an approved project. Number: 203 Created: 4/10/2003 (6/18/03] Thank you for providing building elevations for the bath house. In accordance with 3.5.3(D)(6)(a) a base treatment needs to be articulated on all 4 facades of the pool house. [4/10/03] Elevations of the bath house building must be included on the building elevation sheet(s). Make sure materials, colors, and dimensions are included. Number: 268 Created: 6/18/2003 There are only a few items to clear up before we are ready to go to hearing. These items won'trequire a full formal submittal, however the items do need to be resolved prior to scheduling for the hearing. Here is a list of the items: • (1) Susan Joy needs a revised plat informally submitted to her that addresses her plat comments; • (2) Susan Joy needs the variance request resubmitted with the correction asked for; • (3) The Sidehill Boulevard right-of-way, as it crosses the valley wall, may or may not have grading encroachment into the required natural habitat buffer (see issue # 146 dated 1 /6/03), and needs to be coordinated with Doug Moore of Natural Resources at 224-6143. Doug needs the grading sheets of the utility plans with the buffer zones shown in order to complete his review; • (4) Letters of Intent or the actual easements themselves for all off -site easements (all we have so for is legal descriptions). Number: 269 Created: 6/18/2003 The driveway location for Lot 1, Block 2 is different between the plat and the alternative compliance diagram. Please double check that this information is correct for all other lots, and fix the discrepancy for this lot. Page I