HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARADIGM PROPERTIES - ODP - 29-01A - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSAPPENDIX F
mll
nl:bLuvu: oignaii.ea inLel6cCLiUn:5 ncicn�c s.+
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/E. Fr Cage Road
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P_ Area Type: All other c_ as
Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: F t Collins
Period: amqv Year long otal bkgrd
Project ID: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: East Frontage Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L TR I
Volume I50 595 180 1130 405 75 1460 40 115 170 45 30 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A P I NB Left A A A
Thru P I Thru A A
Right P I Right A A
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A P I SB Left A A
Thru P I Thru A
Right P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right A A
SB Right I WB Right A
Green 6.0 45.0 6.0 12.0 21.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 390
1770
0.14
0.52
13.8
B
T 838
1863
0.78
0.45
30.4
C 24.1 C
R 1176
1583
0.18
0.68
5.9
A
Westbound
L 249
1770
0.58
0.52
21.9
C
T 838
1863
0.54
0.45
22.4
C 20.8 C
R 886
1583
0.09
0.56
10.3
B
'Northbound
L 555
1770
0.92
0.40
50.3
D
TR 546
1655
0.32
0.33
25.4
C 44.0 D
Southbound
L 417 1770 019 0.29 26.6
TR 368 1752 0.23 0.21 33.1
Intersection Delay = 29.2 (sec/veh)
-C
C 29.9 C
Intersection LOS = C
' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Jt- 2
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/E. Fror' ge Road ,
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other art
Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: F rt Collins
Period: ai[ pm Year lon bkgrd total
Project D: 0225 '
E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: East Frontage Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I ,
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I
LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L TR I
Volume 125 480 300 1175 655 110 1385 25 90 175 50 20 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 '
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ,
EB Left A P I NB Left A A A
Thru P I Thru A A
Right P I Right A A
Peds X I Peds X '
WB Left A A P I SB Left A A
Thru A P I Thru A
Right A P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X ,
NB Right I EB Right A A
SB Right I WB Right A
Green 6.0 4.0 46.0 6.0 10.0 18.0
Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 '
All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate ,1
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 321 1770
0.09
0.54
14.6
B
T 857 1863
0.62
0.46
23.8
C
17.3
B
R 1061 1583
0.31
0.67
7.1
A
Westbound
L 415 1770
0.47
0.57
14.5
B
,
T 932 1863
0.78
0.50
24.9
C
21.0
C
R 966 1583
0.13
0.61
8.3
A
Northbound
,
L 481 1770
0.89
0.35
49.3
D
TR 460 1644
0.28
0.28
28.4
C
44.5
D
Southbound
L 388 1770
0.21
0.26
29.0
C
TR 321 1784
0.24
0.18
35.6
D
32.2
C
Intersection Delay
= 25.3
(sec/veh) Intersection
LOS = C ,
HCS2000: Signalized
Intersections Release 4.1b
'
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
'
Phone: (970) 669-2061
Fax:
(970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL
ANALYSIS
,
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-W1. STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst:
Michael
Agency/Co.:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed:
5/10/02
Analysis Time Period:
am
Prospect/RT-in/RT-out
'Intersection:
Jurisdiction:
Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year:
on total
Project ID: 0225
■ East/West Street:
Prospect Road
North/South Street: RT-in/RT-out
Intersection Orientation: EW
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
a Major Street: Approach
Eastbound
Westbound
Movement
1
2
3
1 4
5
6
L
T
R
I L
T
R
Volume
805
215
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.91
0.91
Flow Rate, HFR
884
236
'Hourly
Percent Heavy Vehicles
--
--
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
No
1 1
'Lanes
Configuration
T R
Upstream Signal?
Yes
No
Minor Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
'
Movement
7
8
9
I 10
11
12
L
T
R
I L
T
R
Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
'Percent Grade (�)
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
9
0.90
22
2
.7
Storage
'RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
Lane Config I R I
v (vph)
22
(vph)
410
'C(m)
v/c
0.05
95% queue length
0.17
Control Delay
14.3
LOS
B
'
Approach Delay
14.3
Approach LOS
B
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
1 ¢►
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY )P CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 5 0/02
Analysis Time Period:(a-s)pm
Intersection: Prospect/RT-in/RT-out
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: on total
Project ID: 0225
East/West Street: Prospect Road
North/South Street: RT-in/RT-out
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
volume
ii5
zuu
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.90
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
861
222
Percent Heavy Vehicles
--
--
-- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
No
Lanes
1 1
Configuration
T R
Upstream Signal?
Yes
No
"Minor Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Movement 7
8
9
1 10 11 12
L
T
R
I L T R
Volume
30
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
33
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
Percent Grade
0
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach EB WB
Movement 1 4
Lane Config
Northbound
1 7 8 9 1 10
R
v (vph)
33
C(m) (vph)
414
v/c
0.08
95% queue length
0.26
Control Delay
14.4
LOS
B
Approach Delay
14.4
Approach LOS
B
Southbound
11 12
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
¢U
nu6zuUU: JignaiizeQ 1nE@rSeCL101i9'.^.t31cc5c iL
'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/I-25 Ramp
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P._ Area Type: All other a 3s
Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: am Year on bkgrd total
Project ID: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road NIS St: I-25 NB Ramp
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
1 I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes i 1 2 0 I 0 2 1 I 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
LGConfig I L T I T R I L R I I
Volume 1365 720 I 750 145 1595 300 1 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 1
RTOR Vol 1- I 0 1 0 I I
IDuration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A P I NB Left A
Thru A P I Thru
Right I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
' WB Left I SB Left
Thru P I Thru
Right P I Right
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right A
Green 10.0 48.0 32.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 414 1770 0.96 0.59 48.3 D
T 2053 3539 0.38 0.58 11.4 B 23.8 C
Westbound
T 1699 3539 0.49 0.48 18.7 B 15.9 B
'R 1346 1583 0.12 0.85 1.3 A
Northbound
L 1133 3433 0.58 0.33 28.6 C
29.8 C
'R 507 1583 0.66 0.32 32.4 C
Southbound
' Intersection Delay = 23.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (171) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
37
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/I-25 NP 'amp ,
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other art
Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: F t Collins
Period:pm Year on bkgrd tota
Project D• 0225 '
E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: I-25 NB Ramp
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I '
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I i I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 I
LGConfig I L T I T R I L R
Volume 1190 665 I 870 190 1775 310 1 I
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 I
RTOR Vol I 1 0 1 0 1 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ,
EB Left A P I NB Left A
Thru A P 1 Thru
Right 1 Right A
Peds X I Peds X ,
WB Left 1 SB Left
Thru P 1 Thru
Right P 1 Right
Peds X 1 Peds X ,
NB Right 1 EB. Right
SB Right 1 WB Right A
Green 6.0 48.0 36.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ,
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 300 1770 0.68 0.55 20.9 C
T 1911 3539 0.37 0.54 13.4 B 15.1 B
Westbound
T 1699
3539
0.57
0.48
20.0-
B 16.5 B
R 1409
1583
0.15
0.89
0.7
A
Northbound
'
L 1270
3433
0.68
0.37
28.0
C
28.0 C
R 570
1583
0.60
0.36
28.0
C
Southbound
'
Intersection Delay
= 20.3
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = C ,
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive '
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com ,
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
3 c�
n1;6tuuu: aignaiizeo inLersecLions nexcdse
'Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P
Date: 5/1/0/02
Period: am6Y p
'Project ID: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road
Inter.: Prospect/I-25 Ramp
Area Type: All other as
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year lon bkgrd otal
N/S St: I-25 SB Ramp
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 0 2 1 I 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
LGConfig I T R I L T I I L R I
Volume I 865 850 1230 1115 I 1220 230 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol I 0 1 I 1 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
' Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left I NB Left
Thru P I Thru
Right P I Right
Peds X I Peds X
' WB Left A P I SB Left A
Thru A P I Thru
Right I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right A
SB Right I WB Right
Green 6.0 48.0 36.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs _
'Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
' Eastbound
T 1699
R 1409
Westbound
L 320
T 1911
' Northbound
3539 0.53 0.48
1583 0.63 0.89
1770 0.80 0.55
3539 0.65 0.54
19.3 B 10.9 B
2.3 A
28.4 C
17.1 B 19.0 B
'Southbound
L 655 1770 0.37 0.37 23.4 C
24.2 C
' R 570 1583 0.45 0.36 25.0 C
Intersection Delay = 15.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
Fax: (970) 669-5034
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E
Date: 5/10/02
Period: m pm
Project D: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road
Inter.: Prospect/I-25 SB Ramp
Area Type: All other are
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year long bkgrd total
NIS St: I-25 SB Ramp
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
No. Lanes I 0 2 1 ( 1 2 0 I 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 I
LGConfig i T R I L T I I L R I
Volume 1 640 555 1290 1335 I 1215 350 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
Duration 0.25
Area
Type: All other
areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1
2
3 4 1
5
EB Left
I NB
Left
Thru
P
I
Thru
Right
P
I
Right
Peds
X
I
Peds X
WB Left A
P
I SB
Left A
Thru A
P
I
Thru
Right
1
Right A
Peds
X
I
Peds X
NB Right
I EB
Right A
SB Right
I WB
Right
Green 6.0 48.0 36.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Ea
T 1699
R 1409
Westbound
L 389
T 1911
Northbound
Southbound
3539 0.42 0.48 17.7 B 10.0+ B
1583 0.44 0.89 1.2 A
1770 0.83 0.55 39.2 D
3539 0.78 0.54 20.3 C 23.7 C
L 655 1770 0.36 0.37 23.3 C
27.8 C
R 570 1583 0.68 0.36 30.5 C
Intersection Delay = 19.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
Fax:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
(970) 669-5034
3&
HCS2uuu: aignaiizen incersec�ions:nci�a�o 1
'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/W. Fr `age Road
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P._ Area Type: All other a. is
Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: T.Collins
Period: am parr Year 2.n bkgrd otal
Project ID: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: West Frontage Road
' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 2 0 I 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1
'LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L TR I L T R I
Volume 1205 1230 20 I50 865 430 120 10 60 1425 10 280 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A P I NB Left A. A
Thru P I Thru A
Right P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X X
' WB Left A P I SB Left A A
Thru P 1 Thru A A
Right P I Right A A
Peds X I Peds X X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right A I WB Right A A
Green 6.0 46.0 6.0 10.0 22.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
'Eastbound
L 298 1770 0.77 0.53 27.2 C
TR 1624 3531 0.86 0.46 30.0 C 29.6 C
Westbound
L 233
1770
0.23
0.53
19.1
B
T 1628
3539
0.57
0.46
21.1
C 16.8
B
1061
1583
0.43
0.67
7.9
A
'R
Northbound
L 464
1770
0.05
0.30
24.9
C
TR 357
1623
0.22
0.22
32.3
C 30.6
C
' Southbound
L 584
3433
0.81
0.17
48.2
D
T 596
1863
0.02
0.32
23.3
C 37.1
D
R 681
1583
0.46
0.43
20.7
C
'
Intersection
Delay
= 26.5
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = C
' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
'Phone: (970) 669-2061
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
Fax
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
(970) 669-5034
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E
Date: 5/10/02
Period: am pm
Project D: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road
Inter.: Prospect/W. Fror'-ge Road
Area Type: All other art
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year ong bkgrd otal
N/S St: West Frontage Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 1 I 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 I
LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L TR I L T R I
Volume 1200 820 10 130 1220 435 110 10 50 1325 10 115 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A A P I NB Left A A
Thru A P I Thru A
Right A P I Right A
Peds X 1 Peds X X
WB Left A P I SB Left A A
Thru P I Thru A A
Right P I Right A A
Peds X I Peds X X
NB Right 1 EB Right
SB Right A A I WB Right A A
Green 6.0 4.0 48.0 6.0 6.0 20.0
Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 305 1770
0.73
0.59
32.6
C
,
TR 1837 3533
0.50
0.52
15.8
B 19.1
B
Westbound
L 404 1770
0.08
0.56
10.6
B
,
T 1699 3539
0.80
0.48
25.9
C 21.3
C
R 1029 1583
0.47
0.65
9.2
A
Northbound
'
L 436 1770
0.03
0.28
26.1
C
TR 326 1629
0.21
0.20
33.7
C 32.6
C
Southbound
,
L 446 3433
0.81
0.13
53.0
D
T 484 1863
0.02
0.26
27.6
C 43.8
D
R 649 1583
0.20
0.41
19.1
B
Intersection Delay
= 24.0
(sec/veh) Intersection
'
LOS = C
HCS2000: Signalized
Intersections Release 4.1b
,
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
'
Phone: (970) 669-2061
Fax:
(970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL
ANALYSIS
,
APPENDIX E
33
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date: 5/10/02
Period: am
Project ID: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road
Inter.: Prospect/E. Fron' ?e Road
Area Type: All other arc
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year on kgrr total
N/S St: East Frontage Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L TR I
Volume 140 585 65 170 440 75 145 20 95 190 20 30 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Duration 0.25
Area
Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1.
2
3 4 1 5
EB Left A
P
I NB Left A
Thru
P
I Thru A
Right
P
I Right A
Peds
X
1 Peds X
WB Left A
P
1 SB Left A
Thru
P
1 Thru A
Right
P
1 Right A
Peds
X
1 Peds X
NB Right
1 EB Right
SB Right
1 WB Right
Green 6.0 54.0 30.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 474
1770
0.09
0.61
9.4
A
T 1006
1863
0.64
0.54
19.3
B 17.9 B
R 855
1583
0.08
0.54
11.3
B
Westbound
L 366
1770
0.21
0.61
11.9
B
T 1006
1863
0.49
0.54
16.0
B 14.9 B
R 855
1583
0.10
0.54
11.4
B
Northbound
L 403
1300
0.12
0.31
24.9
C
TR 489
1631
0.26
0.30
26.9
C 26.3 C
Southbound
L
TR
373 1202
509 1695
Intersection Delay
0.27
0.11
= 18.4
0.31 26.4 C .
0.30 25.4 C 26.0 C
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
■
'
HCS2000: Signalized
Intersections Release 4.1b '
Matthew
J. Delich
Matthew
J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
'
Phone:
(970) 669-2061
Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail:
mdelich@frii.com
'
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS'
32, 1
riI.Ozuuu: JlgnatlzCu 13a�c1Dc.ci �.a.� i�cicuo .-.-
'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/E. Fr- tage Road
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P. Area Type: All other a .s
Date: 10/02 Jurisd: Fort C lins
Period: a pm Year on kgrd total
Project D• 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: East Frontage Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
' 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1
'LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L TR I
Volume 110 465 55 1105 685 110 120 10 75 175 10 20 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I
' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A P I NB Left A
Thru P I Thru A
Right P I Right A
Peds X Peds X
' WB Left A A P I SB Left A
Thru A P I Thru A
Right A P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
' NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 6.0 4.0 50-0 30.0
Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 348
1770
0.03
0.58
12.5
B
T 932
1863
0.55
0.50
19.7
B
18.9
B
R 792
1583
0.08
0.50
13.2
B
'Westbound
L 475
1770
0.25
0.61
10.8
B
T 1006
1863
0.76
0.54
21.2
C
18.8
B
R 855
1583
0.14
0.54
11.5
B
'Northbound
L 411
1326
0.05
0.31
24.3
C
TR 485
1616
0.19
0.30
26.2
C
25.8
C
Southbound
L 389
1255
0.21
0.31
25.8
C
TR 503
1676
0.07
0.30
25.0
C
25.6
C
' Intersection
Delay
= 19.7
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
' Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
31
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E
Date: 5/10/02
Period: am(O
Project ID: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road
Inter.: Prospect/I-25 NB "amp ,
Area Type: All other are
Jurisd: Foxt Collins
Year ono kor ,total
N/S St: I-25 NB Ramp
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R
I L T R
I L
T R I L T R I
No. Lanes
I
I
I
I I
0 1 I 0 0 0 I
I 1 2 0
I 0 2 1
I 2
LGConfig
I L T
I T R
I L
R I 1
Volume
1365 530
1 430 85
1660
160 1 I
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
I 12.0 12.0
112.0
12.0 1 I
RTOR Vol
1
I 0
1
0 1 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A P I NB Left A
Thru A P I Thru
Right I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left I SB Left
Thru P I Thru
Right P I Right
Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right A
Green 6.0 50.0 34.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 515 1770 0.77 0.57 27.3 C
T 1982 3539 0.29 0.56 11.6 B 18.0 B
Westbound
T 1770 3539 0.27 0.50 14.8 B 12.5 B
R 1409 1583 0.07 0.89 0.7 A
Northbound
L 1202 3433 0.61 0.35 27.8 C
27.2 C
R 538 1583 0.33 0.34 24.9 C
Southbound
Intersection Delay = 20.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b ,
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive '
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com '
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
D
hc6zuuu: 6ignalizea lncersecciuii�:=ncloaa y • ��
'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/I-25 Ramp
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P. Area Type: All other z As
Date: 5 10/02 Jurisd: Fort Co lins
Period: pm Year ong kgr total
Project ID: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: I-25 NB Ramp
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
'LGConfig I L T I T R I L R I I
Volume 1190 405 I 590 135 1815 125 1 I
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 I
'RTOR Vol 1 I 0 1 0 ( I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
' EB Left A P I NB Left A
Thru A P I Thru
Right I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
' WB Left I SB Left
Thru P I Thru
Right P I Right
Peds X I Peds X
' NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right A
Green 6.0 48.0 36.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 412 1770 0.50 0.55 13.4 B
T 1911 3539 0.23 0.54 12.1 B 12.5 B
' Westbound
T 1699
3539
0.39
0.48
17.3
B 14.2 B
1409
1583
0.11
0.89
0.7
A
'R
Northbound
L 1270
3433
0.71
0.37
28.9
C
28.1 C
570
1583
0.24
0.36
22.7
C
'R
Southbound
' Intersection
Delay
= 19.6
(sec/veh)
Intersection LOS = B
' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
'Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (170) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Zi
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date: 5/10/02
Period: am
Project ID: 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road
Inter.: Prospect/I-25 SP -amp
Area Type: All other are
Jurisd: Fort C lins
Year ong bkgrr )total
N/S St: I-25 SB Ramp
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L T R
I L T R I L T R
1 L T R I
No. Lanes
I
I I
I I
I 0 2 1
I 1 2 0 I 0 0 0
I 1 0 1 1
LGConfig
( T R
I L T I
I L R I
Volume
1 790 850
1135 955 1
1105 295 1
Lane Width
1 12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 1
112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 1
1 0 1
Duration 0.25
Area
Type: All other
areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1
2
3 4 1
5
EB Left
I NB
Left
Thru
P
I
Thru
Right
P
I
Right
Peds
X
I
Peds X
WB Left A
P
I SB
Left A
Thru A
P
I
Thru
Right
I
Right A
Peds
X
I
Peds X
NB Right
I EB
Right A
SB Right
WB
Right
Green
6.0 48.0
36.0
Yellow
0.0 3.0
3.0
All Red
0.0 2.0
2.0
Cycle
Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance
Summary
Appr/
Lane Adj Sat Ratios
Lane Group
Approach
Lane
Group Flow Rate
Grp
Capacity (s) v/c g/C
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Eas
T 1699
3539
0.48
0.48
18.6
B 10.1 B
R 1409
1583
0.63
0.89
2.3
A
Westbound
L 347
1770
0.43
0.55
13.7
B
T 1911
3539
0.56
0.54
15.5
B 15.3 B
Northbound
Southbound
L 655 1770 0.18 0.37 21.4 C
25.7 C
R 570 1583 0.58 0.36 27.3 C
Intersection Delay = 14.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Z%
nC6ZUUv: algna-Lizea �nuersec.L:iun� Acxc=�� 5.-
Michael
Inter.: Prospect/I-25 '- Ramp
'Analyst:
Agency: Matthew J. Delich,
P.,
Area Type: All other a .s
Date: 5/10/02
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: ai pm
Year on bkgr total
Project ID: 0225
E/W St: Prospect
Road
N/S St: I-25 SB Ramp
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
I
'
I L
T R
I L
T R I L T R I L T
I
R I
I
I
No. Lanes I 0
I
I
1 1
1 1
2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
2 1
LGConfig I
T R
I L
T I I L
R I
Volume
520 555
1210
1195 I 175
405 1
Lane Width 1
12.0 12.0
112.0
12.0 I 112.0
12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1
0
1
I 1
0 I
Duration 0.25
Area
Type:
All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2
3;
4 1 5 6 7 8
' EB Left
s
I NB Left
Thru
P
f
I Thru ry
Right
P
I Right
Peds
X
Peds X
' WB Left
A P
I SB Left A
Thru
A P
I Thru
Right
I Right A
Peds
X
I Peds X
' NB Right
I EB Right A
SB Right
I WB Right
Green
6.0 48.0
36.0
Yellow
0.0 3.0
3.0
All Red
0.0 2.0
2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0
secs
Intersection
Performance Summary
Lane
Adj Sat
!Ratios Lane Group Approach
'Appr/
Lane Group
Flow Rate
4
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
T 1699
3539
0.34
0.48
16.7
B 8.7 A
R 1409
1583
0.44
0.89
1.2
A
'Westbound
L 446
1770
0.52
0.55
13.6
B
T 1911
3539
0.69
0.54
18.1
B 17.4 B
' Northbound
4
Southbound Ili
L 655 1770 0.13 0.37 20.9 C
33.6 C
' R 570 1583 0.79 0.36 36.0 D
Intersection Delay = 16.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
'2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J
Date: 5/10/02
Period: am Project IDm: 225
E/W St: Prospect
Inter.: Prospect/W. Fron�-3e Road
Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other are
Jurisd: t C ns
Year long kgrd total
Road NIS St: West Frontage Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L T R
I L T R
I L T, R
I L T R I
No. Lanes
I
I 1 2 0
I
I 1 2 1
I
I 1 1 0
I I
1 2 1 1 1
LGConfig
I L TR
I L T R
I L TR
I L T R I
Volume
1205 1170 20
150 785 415
120 10 60
1410 10 280 1
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A P I NB Left A A
Thru P I Thru A
Right P 1 Right A
Peds X I Peds X X
WB Left A P 1 SB Left A A
Thru P I Thru A A
Right P 1 Right A A
Peds X I Peds X X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right A I WB Right A A
Green 6.0 46.0 6.0 10.0 22.0
Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 326 1770
TR 1624 3530
Westbound
0.70' 0.53 21.6 C
0.81 0.46 27.9 C
27.0 C
L
233
1770
0.23
0.53
18.1
B
T
1628
3539
0.51
0.46
20.2
C 16.0
R
1061
1583
0.42
0.67
7.8
A
Northbound
L
464
1770
0.05
0.30
24.9
C
TR
357
1623
0.22
0.22
32.3
C 30.6
Southbound
L
584
3433
0.78
0.17
46.5
D
T
596
1863
0.02
0.32
23.3
C 35.8
R
681
1583
0.46
0.43
20.7
C
Intersection
Delay
= 25.0
(sec/veh)
Intersection
B
C
D
LOS = C
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b '
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive '
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com '
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
2LP 1
hc6zuuu: oignalizeo 1nLer5eC�i Uil� ncica.�c �.�..
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/W. Fr tage Road
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P. Area Type: All other a as
Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: F t o lins
Period: m Year lon bkgr total
am
Project 0225
E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: West Frontage Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L T R
I L T R
L T R
I L T R I
I
No. Lanes
I
I 1 2 0
I
I 1 2 1
I
1 1 1 0
I
I 2 1 1 1
LGConfig
I L TR
I L T R
I L TR
I L T R I
Volume
1200 720 10
130 1150 420
I10 10 50
1305 10 115 1
Lane Width
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 12.0
112.0 12.0
112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A A P I NB Left A A
Thru A P I Thru A
Right A P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X X
WB Left A P I SB Left A A
Thru P Thru A A
Right P I Right A A
Peds X I Peds X X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right A A I WB Right A A
Green 6.0 4.0 48.0 6.0 6.0 20.0
Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 305
1770
0.73
0.59
32.1
C
TR 1837
3532
0.44
0.52
15.1
B
18.8
B
'Westbound
L 444
1770
0.07
0.56
10.3
B
T 1699
3539
0.75
0.48
24.3
C
20.0+
C
R 1029
1583
0.45
0.65
9.0
A
Northbound
L 436
1770
0.03
0.28
26.1
C
TR 326
1629
0.21
0.20
33.7
C
32.6
C
' Southbound
L 446
3433
0.76
0.13
49.5
D
T 484
1863
0.02
0.26
27.6
C
40.8
D
R 649
1583
0.20
0.41
19.1
B
Intersection
Delay
= 22.9
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = C
' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
'Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
'Phone: (970) 669-2061
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
Fax: (970) 669-5034
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
i
25
APPENDIX D
2¢
Table 4-3
Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections
%.Land Use (from structure.plan)
Commercial. Other corridors within
corridors
Jntersechor+type. Mixed use Low density mixed Al other
districts use residential areas
Signalized D E' D D
intersections
overall
Stop sign control NIA F" F'• E
(arterial/local--any
approach leg)
Stop sign control NIA C C C
(collectorAocal—
any approach leg)
' mitigating measures required
considered normal in an urban environment
Page 4-22 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standard
January 2, 2001
Z'�
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level -of -Service
Average Total Delay
sedveh
A
_< 10
B
>10and<15
C
>15and <<25
D
>25and <35
E
>35and <50
F
> 50
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level -of -Service
Average Total Delay
sec/veh
A
_< 10
B
> 10 and _< 20
C
> 20 and < 35
D
>35and _<55
E
> 55 and < 80
j
F
> 80
22-
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-Wh STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 5/10 02
Analysis Time Period: am m
Intersection: Prospect/E, Frontage Road
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0225
'East/West Street: Prospect Road
North/South Street: East Frontage Road
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach
Eastbound
Westbound
Movement
1
2
3
1 4
5
6
L
T
R
I L
T
R
'
Volume
17
127
19
4
95
4
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.91 0.91
0.91
0.85 0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
18
139
20
4
ill
4-
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0 1 0
0 1 0
Configuration
LTR
LTR
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
'
Movement
7
8
9
I 10
11
12
L
T
R
I L
T
R
22
3
6
0
8
7
'Volume
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
25
3
7
0
9
8
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
2
2
2
2
'Percent Grade M
0
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
No
No
Storage
'RT Channelized?
Lanes
0
1
0
0
1
0
Configuration
LTR
LTR
' Delay,
Approach EB
Movement 1
Lane Config LTR
Queue Length, and Level of Service
WB Northbound Southbound
4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
LTR I LTR I LTR
v (vph)
18
4
:35
1 I
(vph)
1474
1420
656
715
'C(m)
v/c
0.01
0.00
0.05
0.02
95% queue length
0.04
0.01
0.17
0.07
Control Delay
7.5
7.5
10.8
10.2
A
A
B
B
'LOS
Approach Delay
10.8
10.2
Approach LOS
B
B
HCS2000:
Unsignalized
Intersections
Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich,
P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY JP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 5/10/02
Analysis Time Period: (am)pm
Intersection: ospect/E. Frontage Road
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: ecent long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0225
East/West Street: Prospect Road
North/South Street: East Frontage Road
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume z lUl 1/ 4 15U J
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.88
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 118 19 4 170 5
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Volume
4
0
4
4
3
5
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
4
0
4
4
3
5
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
2
2
2
2
Percent Grade ($)
0
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
No
No
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0 1 0
0 1 0
Configuration
LTR
LTR
Delay,
Queue
Length, and Level of
Service
Approach
EB
WB
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
1 7 8 9
1 10 11 12
Lane Config
LTR
LTR
I LTR
I LTR
v (vph)
2
4
8
12
C(m) (vph)
1401
1447
748
702
v/c
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
95% queue length
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.05
Control Delay
7.6
7.5
9.9
10.2
LOS
A
A
A
B
Approach Delay
9.9
10.2
Approach LOS
A
B
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Z. d
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
' TWO -WA ffOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 5/10/02
Analysis Time Period: am o
Intersection: Prospect/I-25 NB Ramp
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recen long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0225
'East/West Street: Prospect Road
North/South Street: I-25 NB Ramp
Intersection Orientation: EW
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach
Eastbound
Westbound
Movement
1
2 3 1 4
5
6
L
T R I L
T
R
'
Volume
206
138
112
12
-Peak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
223
149
131
14
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
--
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0
1
1 0
Configuration
LT
TR
Upstream Signal?
No
No
' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Volume
461 a��
25
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.89 1-140
0.89
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
517
28
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
Percent Grade M
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
No
Lanes
1 1
Configuration
L R
0
Delay,
Queue Length, and Level
of Service
Approach
EB
WB Northbound
Southbound
1
4 1 7 8
9 1 10 11 12
'Movement
Lane Config
LT
I L
R I
v (vph)
223
517
28
(vph)
1437
328
898
'C(m)
v/c
0.16
1.58
0.03
95% queue length
0.55
30.07
0.10
Control Delay
8.0
302.4
9.1
A
F
A
'LOS
Approach Delay
287.4
Approach LOS
F
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
1 i9
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: W10/02
Analysis Time Period;(ay pm
Intersection: rospect/I-25 NB Ramp
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recen long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0225
East/West Street: Prospect Road
North/South Street: I-25 NB Ramp
Intersection Orientation: EW
0
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
67
99
132 27
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.93
0.93
0.85 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
72
106
155 31
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
-- --
-- --
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0
1
1 0
Configuration
LT
TR
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Volume
630
21
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
poae�
0.85 11keo
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
741
24
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
No
Lanes
1
1
Configuration
L
R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config LT I L R I
v (vph)
72
741
24
C(m) (vph)
1388
559
948
v/c
0.05
1.33
0.03
95% queue length
0.16
31.56
0.08
Control Delay
7.7
180.7
8.9
LOS
A
F
A
Approach Delay
175.3
Approach LOS
F
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
10
I
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO -WA ;TOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 5/10 02
Analysis Time Period: am('pm)
Intersection: Pro pect/I-25 SB Ramp
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recen long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0225
East/West Street: Prospect Road
North/South Street: I-25 SB Ramp
Intersection Orientation: EW
i Major Street
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
' Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
331 670 34 537
0.96 0.96 0.88 0.88
344 697 38 610
1 0
TR
No
0 1
LT
No
Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
13
118
'Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
0.88
0.88
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
14
134
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
Percent Grade (%) 0
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
No
Lanes
1
1
Configuration
L
R
'
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of
Service
Approach
EB WB Northbound
Southbound
1 4 1 7 8 9
1 10 11
12
'Movement
Lane Config
LT I
I L
R
v (vph)
38
14
134
(vph)
668
151
494
'C(m)
v/c
0.06
0.09
0.27
95% queue length
0.18
0.30
1.09
Control Delay
10.7
31.3
15.0-
LOS
B
D
B
Approach Delay
16.5
Approach LOS
C
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
' Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E:
1 11
RCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY )P CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 5/10/02
Analysis Time Period: pm
Intersection: rospect/I-25 SB Ramp
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: ecent long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0225
East/West Street: Prospect Road
North/South Street: I-25 SB Ramp
Intersection Orientation: EW
Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
162 414
48
713
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.90 0.90
0.87
0.87
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
180 460
55
619
Percent Heavy Vehicles
-- --
2
-- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1 0
0
1
Configuration
TR
LT
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Volume
5
243
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
T�Ao 0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
kov� { 5
285
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
Percent Grade (%)
0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
No
1 1
L R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of
Service
Approach
EB WB Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1 4 17 8 9
1 10 11
12
Lane Config
LT (
I L
R
v (vph)
55
5
285
C(m) (vph)
944
158
375
v/c
0.06
0.03
0.76
95% queue length
0.19
0.10
6.14
Control Delay
9.0
28.5
39.3
LOS
A
D
E
Approach Delay
39.1
Approach LOS
E
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
16
HCS2000: Unsignalized intersections heiease 4.io
TWO-WT STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
'Date Performed: 5/10/02
Analysis Time Period: am 0
Intersection: Prospect/W. Frontage Road
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recen long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0225
East/West Street: Prospect Road
'North/South Street: West Frontage Road
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach
Movement
1
L
Eastbound
2
T
3
R
1 4
I L
Westbound
5
T
6
R
'Volume
57
974
3
2
624
29
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.94 0.94
0.94
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
63
1082
3
2
663
30
Heavy Vehicles
2
--
--,
2
--
--
'Percent
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0 1 0
0 1 0
Configuration
LTR
LTR
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
7
8
9
1 10
11
12
'
L
T
R
I L
T
R
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade ($)
'Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
'RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Delay,
Approach
EB
Movement
1
'Lane Config
LTR
v (vph)
63
C(m) (vph)
902
0.Oi
'v/c
95% queue length
0.22
Control Delay
9.3
LOS
A
Delay
'Approach
Approach LOS
5
0
4
23
0
120
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.88
0.88
0.88
5
0
4
26
0
136
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
No No
0 1 0 0 1 0
LTR LTR
Queue Length, and Level of Service
WB Northbound Southbound
4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
LTR I LTR I LTR
2
9
162
643
48
187
0.00
0.19
0.87
0.01
0.61
6.39
10.6
96.6
B5.9
B
F
F
96.6
85.9
F
F
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
'Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY 1P CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 5/10/02
Analysis Time Period: am m
Intersection: rospect/W. Frontage Road
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 42Dlong bkgrd total
Project ID: 0225
East/West Street: Prospect Road
North/South Street: West Frontage Road
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
60
567
2
3
922
31
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.85 0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
67
637
2
3
1084
36
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
--
--
2
--
--
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0
1 0
0 1 0
Configuration
LTR
LTR
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
7
8
9
1 10
11
12
L
T
R
I L
T
R
Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate,HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
5
2
3
6
0
27
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
5
2
3
7
0
31
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
No
Im-
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0 1 0
0 1 0
Configuration
LTR
LTR
Delay,
Queue
Length, and Level of
Service
Approach
EB
WB
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4
1 7 8 9
1 10 11 12
Lane Config
LTR
LTR
I LTR
I LTR
v (vph)
67
3
10
38
C(m) (vph)
624
945
61
139
v/c
0.11
0.00
0.16
0.27
95% queue length
0.36
0.01
0.54
1.04
Control Delay
11.5
8.8
75.3
40.4
LOS
B
A
F
E
Approach Delay
75.3
40.4
Approach LOS
F
E
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
11
APPENDIX C
13
ATD Services, Inc.
6214 Secrest Street
Arvada, CO.80408ile Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
:EFRONT&PROSPECTPM
:99923778
: 02/07/2002
:2
EAST FRONTAGE RD
PROSPEC
FRONTAGE RD
PROSPECT
ft
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
ISouft1Po4unihd
7h
j Ate'
IWm
Left Th
A'
Togl
Left
t
ApP'
Total
Left
Thru
8i9h
t
App.
Total
Int.
Total
t
Total
t
Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak
1 or 1
Intersectio 04:15 PM
Volume 0 8 7 15
4 97 4 105
24 3 6 33
16 123 16 157
310
Percent 0.0 53.3 46.7
3.8 92.4 3.8
72.7 9.1 18.2
10.2 78.3 11.5
High InL 04:15 PM
04:30 PM
05:00 PM
04:15 PM
04:15
Volume 0 2 3 5
1 27 2 30
4 0 1 5
5 33 5 43
83
Peak Factor 0.750
0.847
0.589
0.913
0.934
EAST FROM FAZE KV
ON to �To�d�
I0 15 I 0
71 B 0
iw Thu Lao
4 1 L+
l(IMM"Z I Af, !r
Nam
DZIOU200217;00
UnanNad
R T Rir
241 3
® 33
Out In Tahl
EASTFRONTAGERO
(2
UM/ 1al uL io.li rnn b. u 4o4 Ujuo
ATD Services, Inc.
6214 Secrest Street
Arvada, CO.80468e Name : EFRONT&PROSPECTAMI
Site Code : 99923778
Start Date : 02/07/2002
Page No :2
Start Time
soMbOLM
Left Thru
Rtgt
T�otap�
Lit
..wow
h
T t
Total
—
Left ThN
Righ
t
App.
Total
Left
Thru
Righ
t
App.
Total
Int.
Total
peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak
1 of 1
Intereectio
07:00 AM
Volume
4 3
5
12
4 149
5
158
4 0
4
a
2 100
17
119
297
Percent
33.3 25.0
41.7
2.5 94.3
3.2
50.0 0.0
50.0
1.7
07:15 AM 0
14.3
07:15
High Int.
07:15 AM
07:45 AM
07.00 AM
0
0 30
5
Volume
1 2
2
5
0•�
1 39
1
0.841
1 0
0.661
0.835
0.982
Peak Factor
^out In Total
I�� 12 Ifi
iS J
RiChl Ttw Le
4 1 '+
8I
TNormt♦ 07707=0207:00ozm7=2 07.45 Un4Ntto0N m �
r
a .�
�TF►
Left Right
4 0
z4 a az
Out le Total
EAST FRONTAGE RD
V •L. lU/ YL 1V 11 U"f 01 V ' jl UUUU
ATD Services, Inc.
6214 Secrest Street
Arvada, CO.80403 File Name : 25NB&PROSPECTPM
Site Code : 99923778
Start Date : 02/06/2002
Page No : 2
NB
PROSPECT
t25 N8
PROSPECT
sot,mbotn,a
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Start Tune
Left
Thru
Left
Thru ��'
left
Thru �9h t
Total
Left
-Mru Int
t Total Total
t
Total
t
Total
Peak HOW From U4:UU VM m U.1:43 rrr - remc a u1 a
Intersectio
04:45 PM
n
Volume
0 0 0
0
0 108
11 219
465 2
Percent
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 90.8
9.2
94.3 0.4
High Int.
3:45:00 PM
05:30 PM
05:30 PM
Volume
0 0 0
0
0 22
5 27
128 1
Peak Factor
0.850
out In Total
72r o a+
0 0 0
Right Thnr Lan
*'1L►
26 493 208 142 0 350 962
5.3 59.4 40.6 0.0
04:45 PM 05:15
8 137 S2 41 0 93 257
0.887 0.921 0.936
�BI°'I NI
0
n
a 3
g7/06200217;70 $ 1O
n unshm"
aN�r ,-V—I
o �
*,Tr
Left ,� TFru Right
z 261
�1 493 493
Out In TOW
25 Na
W
u4/ 1J uc 10:11 FA 04 V 4"
ATD Services; Inc.
' 6214 Secrest Street
Arvada, CO. 80403 File Name : 25NB&PROSPECTAM
Site Code : 99923778
' Start Date : 02/06/2002
Page No : 2
StartTune } Left I Thru
eak Four From 07.00 AM to 08A
1ntersectio 07:00 AM
n
Volume 0 0 0
- Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0
High Int. 6:45:00 AM
Volume 0 0 0
Peak Factor
Righ APP• �' Le-tI ThN Right APR•
left Thnr LeR ThN t Total Total
- PWK
1 Or 1
0
0 132 27
159
635 1
22 658
65 99
0 164 981
0.0 83.0 17.0
96.5 0.2
3.3
39.6 60.4
0.0
07:45 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:30
0
0 34 7
41
189 1
5 195
20 24
0
0.846
0•
0 944 0.280
Out to TOM
B] 0
Ol Ul B
got TM LAB
4J1L+
Dw
,pv�
T
t
jR
NOflh
t
U—�
2
ouoreoaz BroB
M
07
N 1p
s�
.� o 9WQ
-1 --:�
T F+
Left Thn, p4t
dam t 22
�nT
Out 1n TOW
m NO
I
V 'l/ 1JI UL xu.ly 11[Y JI V SV. VJVJ ♦•11� J1..1\"Ll\V!l:• V1\v�.
ATD Services, Inc.
6214 Secrest Street
Arvada, CO.80403 File Name : 25SB&PROSPECTPM
Site Code : 99923778
Start Date : 02/06/2002
Page No : 2
SB
PROSPECT
l25 SB
PROSPECT
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Start Time
LeR Thru " "
Left Thru w9h
LeR Thru � APP•
t Total
Left Thru Righ
t
t Total
t Total
PeaK r4our from u4:W m uu uima rrl - r n • v,
Intersectio 04:45 PM
Volume 13 0 135 148 32 537 0
Percent &B 0.0 91.2 5.6 94.4 0.0
Nigh int. 05:30 PM 05:30 PM
Volume 4 0 38 42 12 150 0
Peak Factor 0.881
569 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0
3:45:00 PM
162 0 0 0
0.878
old In TOW
14e us
A� Leh
4J 1 L+
T
NOM
02AW2M 1 :45
02M@I 0217:30
kahHw
~l I r+
Leh MM mod
0 6 0
661 0 661
in T"
QS S5
0 0 324 629
0.0 34.0 66.0
05:00 PM
0 0 83 159
V
r 9
App. InL
Total Total '
953 1670
05:30
242 446
0.961 0.936
U-+ / 10/ U4 10. lU 1' A t/ 1 U 404 0000 arxu%-DttVnn
ATD Ser IceSI; Inc.
6214 Secrest Street
Arvada, CO.80403. File Name : 25SB&PROSPECTAM
Site Code : 99923778 .
Start Date : 02/06/2002
Page No : 2
Start Time
Left
Thru
Rtgh
T�
Left
I Thn l
� I
Toml f
Left
I Thn `
w9c
IT�I '
I Left
I Thru 1
�y � �
Totai �
Total
eak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak
1 of 1
Intersectlo
07:30 AM
n
Voiume
4 1
241
246
46 709
0
755
0
0
0
0 0 164
404
568
1569
Percent
1.6 0.4
98.0
6.1 93.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 28.9
08:00 AM
71.1
07:30
High InL
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
6:45:00.AM
0
0 0 38
98
136
Votume
3 1
70
74
10 206
0
216
0
0
0.899
0.426
Peak Fador
0.831
0.874
125 sa
Qp In TOW
24 24a
2N 1 4
Rq Tern Lett
4j 1 L+
o� T
o
m
s
= � 02mer2m0720 /---
e s
021OWN20e:t5
lUmtftd
-1
o
ap So 8
+n T r
eeO
451 0 451
out IN TOW
12556
q
03 10i uc 10: iu roe a, 0 toe 0000 1c. r. uttuw
�l.vu. v.. ..
ATD Services, Inc.
6214 Secrest Street
Arvada, CO.804031e Name : WFRONT&PROSPECTPM
Site Code : 99923778
Start Date : 0210712002.
Page No :2
WEST FRONTAGERD
PROSPECT wrwrnvmi^���
Eastbound
Southbound
Westbpund Nortbound
left Thru
Wgh
Ate'
LeR
Thu Rgh
App. Left Thru
�9h App' Lef
11vu Righ
t
App. tnt.
Total Total
Start Time
t
Total
t
Total
t Total
PeaK Hour rrom Iw:w rM m ua:-r3 M7 - rcan , �• ,
intersectio
05:00 PM
n
Volume
25 0 120
145
2 606
27 637
5 0 4
9
57 960
3 1020
1811
Percent
17.2 0.0 82.8
0.3 95.4
4.2
55.6 0.0 44.4
5.6 94.1
0.3
High Int.
05:15 PM
05:15 PM
05:45 PM
05:00 PM
05:00
Volume
8 0 30
38
0 158
8 166
2 0 0
2
18 263
1 282
468
Peak Factor
0.884
0.942
0.563
0.904
0.928
Out In TOW
® 1
1 0 25
faR Left
,j 1 L+
T t
o�
NOAh
w�
O
s ' °•
a omo� tTroO �_ �
oaoTrm0217'.40
s
^
lUn3hred
pCQ
u
4,T[4
Left Ttw Rift
fil 01 4
Y 14
Out In Total
WEST FRONTAGE RD
I
U4/ la UL io. vo r. v, v YOL uJuo LnL
ATD Services, Inc.
' 62U Secrest Street
Arvada, CO.804031e Name : WFRONT&PROSPECTAM
Site Code : 99923778
Start Date : 02/07/2002
Page No : 2
W EST FRONTAGE RD PRO CT RD
WEST FR GE RD
PROSPECT RD
Eastbound
Southbound Westbound
Northbound
APp.
Righ App-
Int.
Righ App. Righ ARP.
start TMe Left Thru Total Left Thm t Total
"'t'
Left 7hru t Total
Left Thru t Total
Total
t
PeaK hour From ui:w wm m uo:nj
t Intersecto
07:15 AM
Volume
6 0 27
33
3 926
33 962
5 2
3 10
60 574
2 636 1641
Percent
18.2 0.0 81.8
0.3 96.3
3.4
50.0 20.0
30.0
9.4 90.3
0.3
07:30
High Int.
07:15 AM
07:30 AM
07:30 AM
07:15 AM
130
0 143 434
'
Volume
0 0 4
4
1 274
8 283
0.850
1 1
2 4
0.625
13
0.393 0.945
Peak Factor
0.688
Out in Toll
® 93 12a
27 0 a
RpN TIIN Lelt
4J 1 L+
fs-1 0
�m
A, T
w
NO h
(_
S m
2� 07/07/2002 07:15 '--.—
�w
"'
02107120020e:00
VlmhiRed �
+,Tr
ten Tlvu R10t
5 2 31
F-5l 10 15
Out In TOW
WEST FRONTAGE RD
APPENDIX B
M
Attachment "B"
Transportation Impact Study
Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet
Origin ,ReqRes Inst Ofc/Bus..'- c6ni'. Ind Other
(Project Site-(Speecify).)
'Recreation
r
`Commercial
4fid ukii A
Other '-Y
List the pedestrian destinations within 1320' (1.5 miles for schools) of the project
boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian Level of Service for the facility/corridor
linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity,
types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and
security of the selected route(s).
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
January 2,2001
3
No Text
SCALE: 1'=1000'
' PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA
Attachment "A"
Transportation Impact Study
Base Assumptions
Project Information :.
Project Name
tFACA 1GNt ?Ro?roe -rtES
Project Location
$E CoRMSe of �'-ZS t'RoSPc�GT
TIS Assumpt.±Dus
Type of Study
Full: SJG S
Intermediate: ,(J p
Study Area Boundaries
North: PQo3ASC-r
South: 5,-tC-
East: CA Sr `-R. Qe A O
West: WG S-r Fe. "A b
Study Years
Short Range: Pop 6S ')
Long Range _020
Future Traffic Growth Rate
P469 AICZT
F2ortJTA6
FLAN
Study Intersections
1. All access drives
5• ,eosPerr GF.
2. �KoSPEcT��/. F. i' .
6.
3• �2oSPG-zT �s f33 �a.H A s
7.
4. `gosPFrcr1AJ6 12AAA PS
8.
Time Period for Study
AM: 7:00-9:
I Sat Noon:,vo
Trip Generation Rates
Pep- _T Tc,:
Trip Adjustment Factors
Passby: P&p ZTe-
Captive /,vTeQ -VAL-
Market: AlomIAIAc,
Overall Trip Distribution AT-(AcoC-;P
North
South
East
West
Mode Split Assumptions
A1A
Committed Roadway Improvements
AS5VMG /AAV1Z0v,9m&A1r3 To bura)eev.A
S&KtcAR To I4A1eMealY
Other Traffic Studies
:4p ,,- sT,az
Areas Requiring Special Study
/F;�Osru-T
Date: $1, / 0 2
Traffic Engineer:
Local Entity Engi
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
January 2, 2001
2
APPENDIX A
I
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This study assessed the impacts of the Paradigm Property on the
long range (2025) street system in the vicinity of the proposed
development. This is a master transportation impact study, as is
appropriate at the overall development plan submittal. When any portion
of the Paradigm Property is submitted as a preliminary development plan,
a transportation impact study will be prepared. As a result of this
analysis, the following is concluded:
The development of the Paradigm Property is feasible from a
traffic engineering standpoint. At full build -out, the Paradigm
Property will generate approximately 11,510 daily motor vehicle
trip ends, 973 morning peak hour motor vehicle trip ends, and 877
afternoon peak hour motor vehicle trip ends. Some of these will
be passby trip ends. A significant portion of the trips will be
oriented to/from I-25.
- Current operation at the Prospect/SB I-25 Ramp and Prospect/EFR
intersections is acceptable. Current operation at the Prospect/
WFR and Prospect/NB I-25 Ramp intersections is unacceptable.
Acceptable operation at an arterial/arterial signalized
intersection during the peak hours is defined as level of service
D or better overall. Acceptable operation at stop sign
controlled intersections during the peak hours is defined as
level of service E for any approach leg.
Peak hour signal warrants are expected to be met by/before the
long range (2025) future at all of the existing key stop sign
controlled intersections.
With the long range (2025) background traffic, the key
intersections will operate acceptably.
In the long range future, given full development of the Paradigm
' Property and an increase in background traffic, the key
intersections will operate acceptably. The long range geometry is
shown in Figure 9.
' - Pedestrian and bicycle level of service analyses should be
addressed at the time of a preliminary development plan submittal.
' At the present time, there are no pedestrian or bicycle
destinations within 1320 feet of the Paradigm Property. This area
is not served by Transfort, nor will it be served by Transfort in
the future, according to the Fort Collins Transit Plan.
1
21
The Fort Collins policy regarding adequate public facilities is that
if a development generates less than 10,000 trip ends per day, the
' subject intersection must be less than one mile from the site to be an
adequate public facilities concern. The Paradigm Property is greater
than one mile from the Prospect/Timberline intersection. At full
' development (Table 2), the trip generation will be greater than 10,000
trip ends per day. However, a significant number of these trip ends
will be oriented to/from I-25. In addition to this, a PDP proposal
for the Paradigm Property would likely be for a portion of the ODP
site, which would generate less than 10,000 trip ends per day.
Therefore, it is not likely that a PDP proposal for the Paradigm
Property would have an adequate public facilities issue pertaining to
' the Prospect/Timberline intersection.
There is currently an engineering study underway for improvement
' to Prospect Road between the Cache la Poudre River and Summitview
Drive. This is currently a two-lane road segment with a rural cross
section. That engineering study is evaluating an improved two-lane
cross section and the ultimate four -lane cross section. This will
present an opportunity for improved operation in this segment of
Prospect Road and at the Prospect/Summitview intersection. It is
expected that Prospect Road will have a four -lane cross section, as
' shown on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan, by/before the long range
future.
20
1 appropriate to address pedestrian level of service in a master TIS. A
detailed pedestrian level of service analysis will be provided in the
' PDP TIS.
Bicycle Level of Service
There are currently no bicycle destination areas within 1320 feet
' of the Paradigm Property. There are also no existing bicycle
facilities within this area. The Fort Collins Bike Map shows that
there will be on -street bike lanes along Prospect Road and along I-25.
It is not appropriate to address bicycle level of service in a master
' TIS. A detailed bicycle level of service analysis will be provided in
the PDP TIS.
Transit Level of Service
' Currently, this area is not served by Transfort. The Fort
Collins Transit Plan indicates that this area will not be served by
Transfort in the long range future. Therefore, a transit level of
service analysis is not required.
1
Other Issues
tIn the scoping meeting for this transportation impact study, two
issues were mentioned. These were: the adequate public facilities
' concern regarding the Prospect/Timberline intersection, and
improvements to Prospect Road between the Cache la Poudre River and
Summitview Drive.
Based upon recent peak hour traffic counts at the
Prospect/Timberline intersection, it has been determined that this
intersection operates unacceptably. The transportation impact study
' guidelines indicate that significant impact is defined in Section
4.5.2.A.2 in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards," as
follows: "When the background traffic conditions (without project
traffic) causes an intersection to fail the minimum acceptable level
of service standards; and when the project traffic causes more than a
2 percent increase in the intersection delay." As,.has been recognized
by the City of Fort Collins, the Prospect/Timberline intersection is
currently geometrically deficient. It does not take much site
generated traffic to cause a greater than 2 percent increase in delay
at this intersection. It is expected that by/before the long range
' future (2025), there will be appropriate geometric improvements at the
Prospect/Timberline intersection, such that it will operate
acceptably. As such, this intersection will not present adequate
public facilities concerns in the long range future. However, when a
PDP proposal is put forth for any portion of the Paradigm Property,
the Prospect/Timberline intersection may need to be analyzed at the
condition that it exists at the time of that development proposal.
19
L
to
N N
w
w
N
L
N
C
C
C m
Ca O
Cm Q 2 m
f0 lr` � l0
C �m 0 C O
L d LL
w
w
Prospect
CO
N
N
o
0 2 �
c
H
+-- - Denotes Lane
LONG RANGE (2025) GEOMETRY Figure 9
TABLE 4
Long Range (2025) Total Peak Hour Operation
Wye
(signal)
NB
c
c
17
0
0
m
w
0
LL
>(D
3
O Ln
Ln � o v
435/430
I� ``' �-1220/865
30/50
200/205
820/1230 0 CD
I I
10/20
0 0 Ln
LO
N
w
w
w
CO
IV
�y N-1335/1115
290/230 190/145
870f750 Prospect
640/865 775/805
555/850 790/5
665/720 —am-10 o/ 200/215
o� o 0
A 0)
� U
Q
S
O
Z ~
H
7A
LONG RANGE (2025) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
4
N
0
0
Cu
CP
U-
N
N
W
o
11 on5
IN Ln f1 �— 655/405
J j � 175/130
25/50 —f
480/595 i
300/180 a N
W N
M
--w— AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Figure 8
TABLE 3
Long Range (2025) Background Peak Hour Operation
• .... �rr ��1� /.�^� .�. C � �' � hyc i,.ri�
4i`"y^ ri�5` iZ
A Ky(��-Z f3^�+hs -�4F G [Sl,�i.^���2yJ��v`j
r .. "vt_.i>n A h ....�5 lx X+v ..�`
�, c)4 Z .f-(�'_�.Y 4{i� ii xw�
R��R` sa'u>
�4 +.+,w� .�
n.}a.�T. �.`Y. lt'.J..t
'T
t a's fr'i
v C i•. �;�?.S
t A `F*'1'y�=f,
M1 t NAY d. �a l9 3�+'
4 3 W.,y t4 U IV
Prospect/WFR
(signal)
EB
B
C
WB
C
B
NB
C
C
SB
D
D
OVERALL
C
C
Prospect/SB 1-25 Ramp
(signal)
EB
A
B
WB
B
B
SB
C
C
OVERALL
B
B
Prospect/NB 1-25 Ramp
(signal)
EB
B
B
WB
B
B
NB
C
C
OVERALL
B
C
Prospect/EFR
(signal)
EB
B
B
WB
B
B
NB
C
C
SB
C
C
OVERALL
B
B
16
a
(9
0
a�
rn
c
0
LL
N
3
coo
420/415
o "
+ �
t 1150/785
30/50
�
200/205
1
720/1170 —a—
10i20
o o
0 0
�o
C
0
CZ
hV o
/ 210/135 135/85
590/430
520/790 —�
555/850 1901365
405/530 —.►
N� FQ
m
da 2m
LONG RANGE (2025) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Prospect
10/40
465/585 —.►
55/65
-►-- AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
a
m
0
N
110/75
— 685/440
./--- 105/70
NO-
Ln O 0
a Q C
N 0O n
Figure 7
the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 7 shows the
site generated peak hour traffic assignment of The Paradigm Property.
Figure 8 shows the long range (2025) total (site plus background) peak
hour traffic at the key intersections.
Signal Warrants
As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any
location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices. It is expected that peak hour signal warrants
will be met by/before the long range (2025) future at all of the key
stop sign controlled intersections.
Operation Analysis
Capacity analyses were performed at the key intersections. The
operations analyses were conducted for the long range (2025) analysis.
Using the traffic volumes shown , in Figure 6, the key
intersections operate in the long range background condition as
indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are
provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably
during the peak hours.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8 and recommended
geometrics, the key intersections operate in the long range total
condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these
analyses are provided in Appendix E.
' Geometry
The long range (2025) geometry is shown in Figure 9. This
geometry assumes that the I-25/Prospect interchange will remain as a
diamond interchange. The interchange itself would look similar to the
I-25/Harmony interchange, except that the frontage roads would be
further away from the ramps at the Prospect Road interchange. Other
potential -interchange configurations would be part of a regional
undertaking and are beyond the scope of a TIS for a specific
development.
Pedestrian Level of Service
Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of
the Paradigm Property site. There is currently one pedestrian
destination within a quarter mile of the Paradigm Property. This is
the small commercial/industrial site to the south of the Paradigm
Property. There are no pedestrian facilities along any of the
streets/roads within the pedestrian influence area., It is not
IW91
O `
�— 66/76
101/60 —
N
N
w N
w
N
cm
137/156
79/93
121 /74 -i 259/187 —►
N� FQ
d� 2�
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
55/61
f 278/317 Pros)
243/114
200/213 f
Qj ^a
(o ^A`�' N
to
y
U
Q
O
Q'
C
H
rn
f— -31 /-34
72/59
12/10
f
r
15/10 —►
243l114 —y
N 00
v co
Ln
M
--a*— AM/PM
Figure 6
v
o
m
M
�o
o
0
c
u_
°
..
�m
y
�O
u_
m
w
0
0
u7
O
°
-f�
Prospect
10/o
� ° �
O
/ \
/
Z
/ \
Z
Site �
.0000,
0
O
M
NOTE: Passby traffic for appropriate land uses
in the Paradigm Property is primarily
related to 1-25 ramp traffic.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 5
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
g�
17 WN -!u�rtRll
160�1
Parcel A
832
Sit-down Restaurant
6.5 KSF
1 130.34
1 850
14.82
31
4.45
29
6.52
42
4.34
28
Parcel B
832
Sit-down Restaurant
7.5 KSF
1 130.34
1 980
14.82
1 36
14.451
33 16.52
1 49
1 4.34
1 33
Parcel C
846
Gas/C-store
12 positions.
152.84
1 1830
5.43
65
5.21
63
6.60
79
6.60
79
Parcel D
834
Fast-food Restaurant
3.6 KSF
496.12
1 1790
25,43
92
24.43
88
17.41
63
16.07
58
Parcel E
320
Motel
64 rooms
5.63
1 360
0.17
11
0.28
18
0.25
16
0.22
14
Parcel F
320
Motel
66 rooms
5.63
1 370
0.17
11
0.28
18
0.25
17
0.22
15
Parcel G
814
Specialty Retail
20.5 KSF
40.67
1 830
1.92
39
1.44
30
1.11
23
1.48
30
Parcel H
770
Officemarehouse
24.6 KSF
12.76
1 310
1.20
30
0.23
6
0.30
7
0.99
24
Parcel 1
770
OfficeMarehouse
32.7 KSF
12.76
1 420
1.20
39
0.23
8
0.30
10
0.99
32
Parcel J
814
Specialty Retail
16.1 KSF
40.67 1
650
1.92
31
1.44
23
1,111
18
1.48 1
24
'Parcel K
814
Specialty Retail
46.1 KSF
40.67 1
1870
1.92
89
1.44
66
1.11
F-51 -r1-48-]
68
Parcel L
770
Office/warehouse
36.7 KSF
12.76 1
470
1.20
44
0.23
8
0.30
11
0.99
36
Parcel M
814
Specialty Retail
33.3 KSF
40.67
780
1.92
37
1.44
28
1.11
21
1.48
29
Total
11,510
1
555
1
418
1
407 1
470
10
w
SITE PLAN
PRQ.0PrrT RQAD ARTERIAL STREET
C-STORE FAST FOOD
FUEL SALES SITE
CAR WASH
RESTAURANT SITE
SITE C D MOTEL
SITE
A o
�y MOTEL
N SITE
RESTAURANT
SITE C
0o r o
RETAIL O000000
a SITE 0 OPEN SPACE �
d3 STORM OFFICE/ RETAIL
/'� DRAINAGE WAREHOUSE V'
V SITE SITE t`Q
2
OFFICE/
0 WAREHOUSE I 4
SITE ' V
EXISTING u
RETAIL n
N SITE
0 OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE
RETAIL SITE
M SITE
K L
RETAIL
SOUTHEAST FRONTAGE ROAD
COLLECTOR ST
A&
N
NO SCALE
Figure 4
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The Paradigm Property is a commercial development, located east of
' Interstate 25 and south of Prospect Road in Fort Collins. Figure 4
shows a site plan of the Paradigm Property development. The
development, at the ODP level, will consist of two sit-down restaurants,
a fast-food restaurant, a gas/convenience store with 12 fueling
positions, two motels, 116,,000 square feet of retail, and 94,000 square
feet of office/warehouse. The site plan shows that the site will be
accessed via two site accesses to the EFR, and one RT-in/RT-out access
to Prospect Road. Since this is an ODP level transportation impact
study, a short range analysis was not required. The long range future
was assumed to be the year 2025.
Trip Generation
Trip generation is important in considering the impact, of a
development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A
compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation,
6th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by
the proposed/expected use at this site. Land use codes 832 (Sit-down
Restaurant), 834 (Fast-food Restaurant), 846 (Gas/C-store), 320 (Motel),
814 (Specialty Retail), and 770 (Business Park) were used. Table 2
shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. It
should be noted that passby trip factors were applied to various land
uses within the Paradigm Property.
Trip Distribution
Directional distribution of the non-passby site generated trips
was determined for the Paradigm Property based upon the existing traffic
volumes, the location of trip productions for this type of land use, and
engineering judgment. Figure 5 shows the trip distributions used for
the following analyses. Passby trip adjustments were primarily applied
to interstate ramp volumes.
Background Traffic Projections
Figure 6 shows the long range (2025) background traffic
projections. Background traffic projections for the long range future
horizon were determined by reviewing traffic forecasts and traffic
studies performed for other developments in this area of Fort Collins,
review of forecasts in the "North Front Range Regional Transportation
Plan, and contact with the North Front Range Transportation & Air
Quality Planning Council.
Trip Assignment
Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are
expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are
8
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
\rr �}}'��`R ri±' ��§"�}'tG 4 }'4 �{..u^r'�.}� .{�,ry�-l� i #i`
W[..���1 1)�f/�t 1 k" '
�,�••Il '19�N��tJ �I�1 ��1111�� �h� $= he.
ProspectNVFR
(stop sign)
NB LT/T/RT
F
F
SB LT/T/RT
E
F
EB LT
B
A
WB LT
A
B
Prospect/SB 1-25 Ramp
(stop sign)
SB LT
D
D
SB RT
E
B
SB APPROACH
E
C
WB LT
A
B
Prospect/NB 1-25 Ramp
(stop sign)
NB LT
F
F
NB RT
A
A
NB APPROACH
F
F
EB LT
A
A
Prospect/EFR
(stop sign)
NB LT/T/RT
A
B
SB LT/T/RT
B
B
EB LT
A
A
WB LT
A
A
Existing Operation
The key intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in
the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the volumes shown in Figure
3, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are
provided in Appendix C. A description of level of service for
signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway
Capacity Manual and the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards
(Intersections) are also provided in Appendix C. The Prospect/SB I-25
Ramp and Prospect/EFR intersections operate acceptably during both the
morning and afternoon peak hours. The Prospect/WFR and Prospect/NB I-
25 Ramp intersections operate unacceptably during the peak hours.
Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours
is defined as level of service D or better overall. Acceptable
operation at stop sign controlled intersections during the peak hours
is defined as level of service E for any approach leg.
Pedestrian Facilities
There are no sidewalks in this area of Fort Collins.
Bicycle Facilities
There are limited bicycle facilities along Prospect Road. There
are limited bicycle facilities along the EFR and the WFR.
Transit Facilities
Currently, this area does not have transit service.
2
N
O
Q'
N
N
C
O
LL
>N
O
n oCn
31 /29
N O so
— 922/624
3/2
�l
60/57 -�
1
I I I
567/974
2/3
Q o g
L a M
MI.
COO)
N a f 713/537
1 / 48/34 27/12 13
132/112
162/331 —
414/670 67/206
99/138 —► �o, ry
N N
�o
BALANCED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Prospect
—*-- AM/PM
A&
N
5/4
--m- 150/95
.— 4/4
Figure 3
cc
NO
LL
C
0
LL
N
O
o Ul)
33/27
4 o m
f_ 126/606
3/2
60/57
1
I I
574/1020
2/3
LQ a M
01.
vJ�
M
709/537
/ T 46/32 27/11
132/108
164/324 —�
404/629 65/208
99/142 -�1(01�3
ir
N
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
4
N
m
O
Qi
c
w
C
0
U-
N
w
C coo 5/4
`n M v 149/97
4/4
Prospect
2/16 f �
100/123 —►
17/18 a a
--*-- AM/PM
Figure 2
SCALE: 1 "=3000'
' SITE LOCATION Figure 1
3
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The location of the Paradigm Property site is shown in Figure 1.
It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions
be presented.
' Land Use
Land uses in the area are primarily residential, vacant, and
commercial. Residential uses, exist to the north, across Prospect Road,
and to the east. Commercial uses exist north and northwest of the site,
along both the West Frontage Road and the East Frontage Road. There are
intermittent vacant parcels of land between more active parcels. Some
of these are in agricultural use. The center of Fort Collins lies to
the west of the Paradigm Property.
Roads
The primary streets near the Paradigm Property site are Prospect
Road, the West Frontage Road (WFR), the Southbound I-25 Ramp, the
Northbound I-25 Ramp, and the East Frontage Road (EFR). Prospect Road
is to the north of the Paradigm Property site. It is an east -west
street designated as a four -lane arterial street on the Fort Collins
Master Street Plan. Currently in this area, Prospect Road has a two-
lane cross section. There are limited bicycle facilities on Prospect
Road. The posted speed on Prospect Road, east and west of the I-25
Interchange, is 45 mph. At the I-25 Interchange, the posted speed on
Prospect Road is 35 mph. At the key intersections, Prospect Road has
single lane approaches.
' The EFR and WFR are approximately 1000 feet from the respective NB
I-25 Ramp and SB I=25 Ramp. The Prospect/EFR and Prospect/WFR
intersections have stop sign control on the EFR and WFR. The Frontage
' Roads have single lane approaches.
The NB and SB I-25 Ramps intersect Prospect Road and are
controlled by stop signs. The ramps have one lane approaches, however
there are functional right -turn flares on each ramp.
Existing Traffic
Recent peak hour counts at the Prospect/WFR, Prospect/SB I-25
Ramp, Prospect/NB I-25 Ramp, and Prospect/EFR intersections are shown
in Figure 2. Raw traffic count data is provided in Appendix B. The
traffic data at the key intersections was collected in February 2002.
' Since these counts were collected on different days, the traffic between
the intersections was balanced and is shown in Figure 3.
2
I. INTRODUCTION
This transportation impact study addresses the capacity,
geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development
known as the Paradigm Property. The Paradigm Property site is located
' east of Interstate 25 and south of Prospect Road in Fort Collins,
Colorado.
' During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made
with the project developer (Paradigm Property LLC), the project planner
(Hattman & Associates), the Fort Collins Transportation Planning staff,
and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff. This study generally
conforms to the master transportation impact study (TIS) format set
forth in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards, Chapter 4-
Transportation Impact Study, January 2, 2001. This TIS is for an
' overall development plan (ODP) for the Paradigm Property. As such, it
only covers full development of the site at the long range future
(2 5) When a preliminary development (PDP) for an actual land use(s)
is proposed, then a TIS will be required that will evaluate the impacts
of just that proposal. That TIS will analyze the impacts in the short
range future. As long as the PDP proposal is in substantial agreement
with the land uses contained in this master TIS, a long range analysis
' will not be necessary in the PDP TIS. The base assumptions form and
related information are contained in Appendix A. The study involved the
following steps:
- Collect physical, traffic, and development data;
Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment;
' - Determine peak hour traffic volumes;
Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key
intersections;
' - Analyze signal warrants;
Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit modes of transportation.
1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Page
1.
Site
Location ........................................
3
2.
Recent
Peak Hour Traffic .............................
4
3.
Balanced Recent Peak Hour Traffic ....................
5
4.
Site
Plan ............................................
9
5.
Trip
Distribution ....................................
11
6.
Long
Range (2025) Background Peak Hour Traffic .......
12
7.
Site
Generated Peak Hour Traffic .....................
14
8.
Long
Range (2025) Total Peak Hour Traffic ............
15
9.
Long
Range (2025) Geometry ...........................
18
APPENDIX
A Base Assumptions Form
B Recent Peak Hour Traffic
C Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions
D Long Range Background Traffic Operation
E Long Range Total Traffic Operation
F Pedestrian/Bicycle Influence Area
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. Introduction ......................................... 1
II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2
LandUse ............................................. 2
Roads................................................ 2
Existing Traffic ..................................... 2
ExistingOperation ................................... 6
Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 6
Bicycle Facilities ................................... 6
TransitFacilities ................................... 6
III. Proposed Development ................................. 8
Trip Generation ...................................... 8
Trip Distribution .................................... 8
Background Traffic Projections ....................... 8
TripAssignment ...................................... 8
SignalWarrants ...................................... 13
Operation Analysis ................................... 13
Geometry............................................. 13
Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 13
Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 19
Transit Level of Service ............................. 19
Other Issues ......................................... 19
IV. Conclusions .......................................... 21
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 7
2. Trip Generation ...................................... 10
3. Long Range (2025) Background Peak Hour Operation ..... 16
4. Long Range (2025) Total Peak Hour.Operation .......... 17
THE PARADIGM PROPERTY
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
MAY 2002
Prepared for:
Paradigm Properties, LLC
P.O. Box 3236
Ventura, CA 93006-3236
Prepared by:
MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: 9707669-2061
FAX: 970-669-5034
OQ
U:��r cam:
within surrounding highway and arterial streets, is a mixed -use development plan
that provides 6.4 acres of highway business uses, 5.9 acres of office and retail
(with warehouse) uses, and 9.4 acres of open space/storm drainage areas. These
proposed land uses provide a logical, tiered transition from the I-25/Prospect
Road interchange to the frontage road and; ultimately, to less intense land uses
such as limited industrial, employment, and residential to the east and south of
this property. Because the entire ON is within 1,320 feet (1/4 mile) of the
centerline of I-25, all site specific project development plans will be subject to
the adopted Development Standards for the I-25 Corridor set forth in Division
3.9 of the Land Use Code.
.J
Staff's Evaluation of the I-25 Subarea Plan
As previously stated, the Paradigm Properties, ODP site is a part of a larger
delineated Activity Center located at the I-25 and Prospect Road interchange on
the "Draft" Land Use Plan in the Fort Collins I-25 Subarea Plan. This delineated
Activity Center is on the east side of I-25 and consists of about 31 acres at the
northeast corner of the interchange and about 150 acres at the southeast corner
of the interchange, with both areas being in the Commercial Corridor. The
Paradigm Properties, ODP is the northwest 23.8 acres of 150 acres (about 1/4
section) at the southeast corner of the interchange. The entire 23.8-acre ODP is
in the C - Commercial Zoning District in the City of Fort Collins and the remainder
of the 1/4 section is in Lorimer County (currently zoned Commercial and FA1
Farming). There are existing residential, commercial, and agricultural uses on the
multiple properties in Lorimer County.
In Section 5.2 Land Use Plan Objectives, Designation of Activity Centers in
the I-25 Subarea Plan it states that activity centers are designated along I-25
at the Prospect Road and Mulberry Street (State Highway 14) interchanges. These
areas are intended to evolve as concentrated areas of mixed -use development with
high visibility and increased levels of activity, with more integrated appearance.
The designated 180-acre Activity Center delineated on the east side of I-25 at
the Prospect Road interchange is as follows:
It is entirely in a Commercial Corridor in the Subarea Plan;
• is entirely in a Commercial Corridor District on the City's adopted Structure
Plan;
• the properties currently within the City of Fort Collins are zoned C -
Commercial; and
• the properties currently within Lorimer County are zoned C - Commercial and
FA1 - Farming.
The Commercial Corridors and Commercial Districts do not preclude a broad range
of a mix of uses that may look like and function as an "activity center". The
Paradigm Properties, ODP, being a 24-acre parcel almost completely contained
H
Policy I-25-LU-1.1 The I-25 subarea will focus on several activity
centers surrounded by residential neighborhoods. Activity centers
should be designed so that new development can support efficient
alternative modes of transportation. Activity centers should provide a
mix of urban uses, including employment, commercial, and residential
area.
- C. Community Appearance and Design
Principle I-25-CAD-1: The subarea's community entryways from
I-25 should be designed to create a sense of place and positive
entry experience.
Policy I-25-CAD-1.1 Development in the subarea will provide for
attractive gateways to the City from the subarea's I-25 interchanges
and overpasses at Harmony Road, Prospect Road, Mulberry Street,
Vine Drive, Mountain Vista Drive, and Carpenter Road, and their
arterial corridors leading in from the highway.
• Locational Standards for Activity Centers and Industrial Zoning
- Both the Regional Corridor Plan and the I-25 Subarea Plan call for
Activity Centers to be located in geographic specific locations. To
implement these placement standards, changes need to be made to
the Employment and Commercial zone districts. Since there is
Industrial zoning within the subarea as well, an applicability cross-
reference will be added to the zone district standards.
The proposed solution is to add standards to the Employment and
Commercial districts that state that any development within one -
quarter mile of the I-25 right-of-way shall be subject to the new
Development Standards for the I-25 Corridor.
• Section 6.3 Street Network and Functional Classifications
The Draft Recommended Roadway Network Plan and the Proposed
Corridor Improvements Plan in the I-25 Subarea Plan identify East
and West Prospect Road to improved to a 4-lane arterial roadway.
Improvements to East Prospect Road are only to be for the 1 mile
section between I-25 and County Road 5.
• Section 6.5 Bicycle Routes
The Recommended Bike and Transit Network Plan in the I-25
Subarea Plan does not show a Bicycle Route out to the I-25 &
Prospect Road interchange. The closest bicycle routes to this area are
on East Mulberry Street and along the Cache La Poudre River.
• Section 6.6 Transit Service
The Recommended Bike and Transit Network Plan in the I-25
Subarea Plan does not show Feeder Transit service to the I-25 &
Prospect Road interchange. There is only Regional Transit shown along
I-25. The Subarea Plan does indicate that transit services within the
subarea will be provided consistent with the 2010 Transit Service
Levels identified in the Transfort Strategic Plan (2002). As land use
intensifies within the I-25 corridor, future analysis will determine
appropriate transit service within the subarea. The area will likely
contain additional Transit Center/Park and Ride facilities located at
or near the I-25 interchanges.
• Section 7.3 I-25 Subarea Principles and Policies
A. Land use
Principle I-25-LU-1: The I-25 subarea will have a balance of
residential, commercial, employment, and civic land uses and
facilities.
R�
Employment/Industrial Districts
• The existing Anheuser Busch facility, and other industrial and
business uses located in the vicinity of Highway 14, establish
the core of future industrial and employment uses in the I-25
corridor. All planned employment/industrial areas east of I-25
are located within 1/2 mile of the highway, with most being
located within 1/4 mile of the highway.
• Section 5.3 Zoning Plan
C - Commercial:
A district for the location of community and regional retail uses,
offices, and personal and business services. The zone also permits
creative forms of housing.
E - Employment:
A district for the location of light industrial, research activities,
offices and institutions. Supporting uses such as hotels, restaurants,
convenience shopping, child care and housing are also permitted.
Supporting uses will not be allowed within 1/4 mile of the I-25
highway.
I - Industrial:
A zone for the location of manufacturing, warehousing and
distribution, indoor and outdoor storage, and a wide range of
commercial and industrial operations. Supporting uses such as
convenience shopping, child care and housing are also permitted.
Supporting uses will not be allowed within 1/4 mile of the I-25
highway.
5
• The I-25 subarea will be unique to Fort Collins, combining a mix
of uses including residential and commercial development, and
open' lands. Care will also be given to incorporating land use
patterns in the subarea into the larger Fort Collins community.
The development pattern will be clearly thought out, allowing
for a compatible mix of uses, both existing and planned, while
avoiding the wall-to-wall commercial development that is
commonly seen elsewhere along interstate corridors.
• Commercial uses in the subarea will combine a variety of
business types and sizes, allowing for a range of commercial
activity and job opportunities. The subarea will have planned
commercial and employment centers as well as areas for smaller
business operations.
• Section 5.2 Land Use Plan Objectives
Designation of Activity Centers. The I-25 Subarea Plan designates
activity centers along I-25 at the Prospect Road and Mulberry Street
(State Highway 14) interchanges. These areas are intended to evolve
as concentrated areas of mixed -use development with high visibility
and increased levels of activity, with more integrated appearance.
• Section 5.3 Land Use Classifications
- Commercial Corridors
• Commercial Corridor areas near the I-25/Prospect Road
interchange are, for the most part undeveloped. While this
classification is typically the location for highway business and
auto -related uses, they also represent opportunities over time
to transform existing developed areas into mixed -use, multi -
modal centers which relate better to the overall community
vision for Fort Collins.
4
• Section 2.3 Existing Structure Plan and Zoning Patterns
In the Existing Structure Plan section it states, in part, that "The
existing Structure Plan (adopted as a component of City Plan) for the
subarea envisions a series of areas of activity along the I-25 corridor
(see Structure Plan map). These areas of activity include the
Harmony Road employment corridor, major employment and
commercial uses at Prospect Road, existing commercial and industrial
uses at I-25/Mulberry Street (Highway 14), and a major
employment/industrial district with supporting commercial uses at
Mountain Vista Drive".
• Section 3.2 Land Use
In the Pattern of New Development section it states, in part, that
"The Northern Colorado Regional Communities I-25 Corridor Plan
promoted the concept of "activity centers" to be the focal points for
intense mixed -use development and the promotion of alternative
modes of transportation. The specific location of these activity
centers falls to this I-25 Subarea Plan".
• Section 3.5 Community Image and Design
- In the Interchange Area Development section it states "The planning
area includes all of the major gateways and corridors into the City
from I-25. Consideration should be given to how the character and
design of commercial areas, especially at Prospect and Mulberry,
relate to community entranceways. Also, which interchanges are
appropriate to become the location of activity centers to be the focal
points for intense mixed -use development and the promotion of
alternative modes of transportation".
• Section 4.2 I-25 Subarea Plan Vision
The Vision describes the general overall land use scenario for the
subarea when it is built out.
3
• In the Land Use Goals it states, in part, that "The I-25 Subarea will have
planned commercial and employment centers that provide- central locations
for commercial uses".
• In the Executive Summary it states, in part, that:
- "Two mixed -use activity centers are identified for the planning area,
one at the I-25/Mulberry Street interchange and the other at the I-
25/Prospect Road interchange. The northeast quadrant of the I-
25/Mulberry Street interchange is also planned for the potential
location of a regional/community shopping center".
"Employment and industrial districts adjacent to I-25 are to be
designed in such a manner as to maintain a perception of openness
through the corridor".
"Secondary uses (retail and highway oriented commercial uses)
typically permitted in industrial and employment districts will be
required to be set back at least on -quarter (1/4) mile from I-25 in
order to avoid the development of a "commercial strip" appearance
along the highway".
- "Low -density, detached single-family residential development is to be
prohibited within one -quarter (1/4) mile of I-25 through various
means, including zoning patterns and land use restrictions".
• Section 2.2 Existing Land Use Patterns
This section, in part, states that "The primary clusters of non-
residential urban development include a mix of commercial and
industrial uses at the I-25/Mulberry Street (Highway 14)
interchange, some limited commercial uses along the frontage road at
the I-25/Prospect Road interchange, and urban residential
development at Waterglen, located north of Vine Drive adjacent to I-
25, and along Mulberry Street east of the highway".
2
City of Fort Collins
Comn. Aty Planning and Environment:. .ervices
Current Planning
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 15, 2004, Public Hearing
To: Planning and Zoning Board Members
From: Stephen Olt, Current Planning,,O,
Re: Paradigm Properties, Overall Development Plan (ODP) - #29-01A
The Paradigm Properties, ODP was discussed at the October 16, 2003, Planning and
Zoning Board public hearing. This is a 23.8-acre ODP containing commercial, office,
lodging, restaurant, and retail uses at the southeast corner of the Interstate 25
(I-25) and Prospect Road interchange. Approximately 98% of the ODP (23.4 acres
of the total of 23.8 acres)is contained within the surrounding street network of
I-251 East Prospect Road, and the Frontage Road. The property is zoned C -
Commercial in the City of Fort Collins and is in the Commercial Corridor District on
the City's adopted Structure Plan.
As part of the discussion during the public hearing on October 16th, a member of
the Planning and Zoning Board suggested that this property is identified as an
Activity Center in the Fort Collins I-25 Subarea Plan. It is shown to be only a
part of a larger delineated Activity Center on the "Draft" Land Use Plan in the
Subarea Plan. This delineated Activity Center is on the east side of I-25 and
consists of about 31 acres at the northeast corner of the interchange and about
150 acres at the southeast corner of the interchange, with both areas being in the
Commercial Corridor.
• In the I-25 Subarea Vision it states, in part, that "Commercial uses in the
I-25 Subarea will combine a variety of business types and sizes allowing for
a range of commercial activity and job opportunities".
281 North College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
i l PARCEL-S
MOTEL
THREE STORY
16.000 S.F.
6 �S0 UK
/ SITE
PARCEL - 4 j SOA25
6 MOTEL S.P.
THREE STORY �� _
/ 1000UNITSF
SITE 1 �
(_,_ S� O S.F.
-PARCEL-3 000 0000
IUE
�irfl9'.2'.R'LY•�dCPai9'J'a1L7PtS ."""
VZ7tPb _ E�.l'JrLP.i ..4
ARTERIAL STRGET_._.
0-60 000QQFI
4RCEL-L
UN RESTAURANT'
JOO S.F. j
SITE j.,,,TTTTT ._
SITE
S.F. t
1 �TE'
J 28TF PARCEL - II3
noc i OPEN SPACE A
5PEcu,� N°RES'14W1 I I / h j O PUBLIC PLAZA
ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES DRIVE -UP p
•,, s, I'•""'"4'1G'o"i.CElJ�d L.000 S.P. 10 D 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 00. O
^,F,At:'? Q o, SITE � O
..o..4L..o . ro, �......,.... e•... co,f ip
or00_
31.00 0-PAR -9 -PARCELS
4 try O �'�'�'�' 0 01 RETAIL / /
FAST ROOD t iI WS 000 5 FE — 9.500 / j
F'•`P'MeoPii
iTwT.n
LO.e
Y
M. L�o we
�..� o•„•....
C
�••� •.o.�n ux.
���,� T.rNO•�
Yx.
-e—e- xATufAL w. ux.
�I�I— a.cTffoAL Lw.
T.
aI•.nATlox Lm.
•n"ilul�ai aau
0 n ou ax
//�� LO�aLATn.
liV
LAND USE
uae {un.n
.{•IC♦fl
T Ya„o a MPW V.
U/p V. W e
i a OPoO .!.
4Gxe V. \e {
f •0000 V. Mll/1
V. \.T
C .TM.'Y appp V. 'N.TO V. 3M
I 1C00 V. OA V. .L {
OIwK1 f MJOO .J. 4iC0 V. 1Y lI
a Mp V. 1.11e V. LI
�.wTp cK�u{ I
•uae u. Tn-
.Isuc nAaA
LM u. us
or{xrAv i a
p\pMTW.�AxA1�I�IAAf�•J� �Tbl V..TN
.O .TY{T. • MIW V. W
{oa. o.oloxnow
TRNe aw.eo •e. IPl1PY .l. 1400 {
/ PARCEL - I
EXISTING
RETAIL
' SINGLE STORY
30.000 S.F.
SITE
13.030 5. .
o{L
—
00� SITE
S.F. I
0I 31•L1C -
p
I
A l
5-F
O
gF. t
L
PARCEL - 14 141
PA EL %
y �t
OPEN SPACE
��������
10 ja PARCEL
_.....
L OFFIC
RETAIaloo
_.-. . .....
SHE
24.000 F.
SITE O
4L,4B0 S.F. j
--
6...r
1 � b��0�'�MS.�•�+wY •'u4•iti 1.N•w� x`a
yy r��iy�/'Y� •Y�
••la yy�p•'pp
Y x M IwY ± f .IV120 V. I
f W.'•'911 L Y'N! u ....yew M.1.ly ti
EXISTING
CIT7 .Ti4{' }•u'7 u w ..a . ram.
TS u
V x..a....N ..�.wi.w..
^M �m' i�oa'•'e..•t'w
KFW-r».wu w .mow
OY MW Ynw F M 00'sm MIL Iw u • Yw .
A ICCESS MA i '1y7PL�eld� v6;T1 w M
VICINITY MAP I'b ,cue im.-uoo rt.
O /
e
ADJACENT
�\
0 .j.
TA
SITE ACCESS
`
o�,tyi•
y
� ' E
12i '
PROJECT NOTES
PARADIGM PROPERTIES
�eUTNEAST FRONTAGE ROAD ���
�•�•..u...e4
u' a
u
. �_ '-'
OVERALL DEVELOPMENT
• 1Ai°'• PROJEC
E%ISTING
OTE9 CONTINUED OTT
7tHFLiN01 •��.or
PLAN aCAIeIK-y9rt
EXISTING CITY` �'�"'• LIMITS a.1 F.90 u
�F
HATTHAN ASSOCIATES
Architecture do Planning
"oyW•�^rp� I
'`
SITE
115 7Swallow Rod
FL CoasColoed0o.87ADJJACENT
ACCESS
"x F:f.Siu•
"�'
:AAR4tLF'Ao$•
970.2297395 Fu 2Obt1
#29-01 A Paradigm Properties ODP
Type II (LUC)
5/23/02 N
1 inch : 1000 feet
Paradigm Properties Overall Development Plan - #29-01A
January 15, 2004 P & Z Meeting
Page 5
Section 3.7.3(E)(1)(a) states:
"For transportation facilities, at a minimum, the city shall require that, at the
time of issuance of any Building Permit issued pursuant to a site specific
development plan, all necessary facilities and services, as described in
Section (D)(1) above, are either:
in place and available to serve the new development in accordance
with the development agreement, or
2. funding for such improvements has been appropriated by the city or
provided by the developer in the form of either cash, nonexpiring letter
of credit, or escrow in a form acceptable to the city."
The City's LUC states that a site specific development plan shall mean and be
limited to a final plan as approved pursuant to this Land Use Code. Therefore, the
Paradigm Properties ODP may be reviewed and approved by the Planning and
Zoning Board at this time, with the knowledge that subsequent Final Compliance
plans for the Paradigm Properties cannot be approved by the City until the
aforementioned Adequate Public Facilities requirements are satisfied. The ODP
notes that infrastructure features are found to be deficient or substandard to the
current City urban development standards. It further notes that the property owner
will work with the Colorado Department of Transportation and the City of Fort Collins
with respect to improvements to the transportation systems in the area.
FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSIONS:
In evaluating the request for the Paradigm Properties, ODP, staff makes the following
Findings of Fact:
• The request is in compliance with the applicable criteria and standards in the Land
Use Code.
• The request is supported by the adopted Fort Collins 1-25 Subarea Plan and Design
Standards.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Board approve the Paradigm Properties
Overall Development Plan - #29-01A.
Paradigm Properties Overall Development Plan - #29-01A
January 15, 2004 P & Z Meeting
Page 4
f. Section 3.6.4 - Transportation Level of Service Requirements
The Traffic Operations and Engineering Departments have reviewed the
Transportation Impact Study that was submitted to the City for review and have
determined that the vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle facilities proposed with this
ODP are consistent with the standards contained in Part II of the City of Fort Collins
Multi -modal Transportation Level of Service Manual.
g. Consistency with the Drainage Basin Master Plan
The Paradigm Properties ODP is consistent with the Boxelder Creek Drainage
Basin Master Plan.
Consistency with the Fort Collins 1-25 Subarea Plan:
The Fort Collins 1-25 Subarea Plan, recently adopted by City Council, identifies the area on
the Paradigm Properties ODP as Commercial Uses. The proposed land uses are
consistent with the adopted plan. Any future development on this site will be subject to the
1-25 Subarea Plan Design Standards.
3. Transportation:
The primary access to the property and various land uses will be via future streets and
drives internal to the site from the existing Frontage Road along the east and south sides of
the property. The proposed ODP shows the arterial and collector street network and
proposed access points (graphically shown with arrows) for local streets. The actual local
street and drive locations and alignments will be determined with site specific project
development plans.
Actual physical development on the Paradigm Properties at this time would result in
a reduction in the levels of transportation services in the area because of
deficiencies associated with the Interstate 25 & Prospect Road interchange. In
Section 3.7.3 -Adequate Public Facilities in the LUC, under Section 3.7.3(C)(2)(b) it
states:
"No site specific development plan or Building Permit shall be approved or
issued in a manner that will result in a reduction in the levels of service below
the adopted. level of service standards for the affected facility."
Paradigm Properties Overall Development Plan - #29-01A
January 15, 2004 P & Z Meeting
Page 3
• Parcel 4 .....
Proposed Motel (Lodging Establishment) ........ (Type 1)
• Parcel 5 .....
Proposed Motel (Lodging Establishment) ........
(Type 1)
• Parcel 6 .....
Proposed Sit -Down (Standard) Restaurant ......
(Type 1)
• Parcel 7 .....
Proposed Convenience Store w/ Fuel Sales ....
(Type 1)
• Parcel 8 .....
Proposed Offices .......................................
(Type 1)
• Parcel 9 .....
Proposed Retail/Warehouse ........................
(Type 1)
• Parcel 10
... Proposed Retail/Warehouse ........................
(Type 1)
• Parcel 11
... Proposed Offices .......................................
(Type 1)
• Parcel 12
... Proposed Retail .........................................
(Type 1)
• Parcels 13 & 14 ..... Proposed Open Space .....................
(Type 1)
The proposed land uses are consistent with the permitted uses in the C -
Commercial District.
b. Section 3.2.2(C)(6) - Direct On -site Access to Pedestrian and Bicycle Destinations
The Paradigm Properties, ODP provides a multi -modal corridor through the site,
from two access points onto the Frontage Road, and several bicycle/pedestrian
routes that connect the various uses to one another as well as to the street network
and surrounding properties in the area.
C. Section 3.4.1(E) - Establishment of Buffer Zones
There are no natural habitats and features on this site that require the establishment
of buffer zones.
d. Section 3.6.1 - Compliance with the Master Street Plan
Other than 1-25 and Prospect Road (a minor 2-lane arterial) along the west and
north sides of the Paradigm Properties, there are no streets shown on the Master
Street Plan within the area of the ODP. Access to the property will be only from the
Frontage Road at points that are consistent with the State Highway Access Control
Code.
e. Section 3.6.3(A) through (F) - Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards
The locations and spacing of the proposed access points to and from the site and
adjacent properties are consistent with the requirements for the various types of
street intersections as set forth in this section of the LUC.
Paradigm Properties Overall Development Plan - #29-01A
January 15, 2004 P & Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background:
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: C; undeveloped, existing agriculture
S: C; existing agriculture, residential, and commercial in Larimer County
E: C; existing agriculture, residential, and commercial in Larimer County
W: C; existing City of Fort Collins Resource Recovery Farm
The property was annexed into the City with the Interstate Associates Annexation (7.5
acres) in August, 1989 and the Paradigm Properties Annexation (16.8 acres) in January,
2002.
The existing Fort Collins Motor Sports retail establishment, shown as Parcel 1
(approximately 2.5 acres) on the Paradigm Properties, ODP, was developed in Larimer
County. The remainder of the property is undeveloped.
2. Land Use:
Compliance with the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code:
As set forth in Section 2.3.2(H), an ODP shall comply with the following criteria:
a. Section 2.3.2(H)(1) - Consistency with zone district standards (Article 4) and general
development standards (Article 3)
This is a request for approval of an ODP for land uses permitted in the C -
Commercial Zoning District, as defined in Section 4.17(B)(2) - Administrative
Review (Type 1) and 4.17(B)(3) - Planning and Zoning Board Review (Type 11) of the
City of Fort Collins LUC. The proposed uses are lodging establishments, standard
restaurants, fast food w/ drive -up restaurants, office, retail, and convenience retail
store w/ fuel sales. The area for the ODP is comprised of existing (Fort Collins
Motor Sports) and proposed commercial development on 24 acres located at the
southeast corner of -the Interstate 25 & Prospect Road interchange.
The breakdown of the parcels and existing/proposed land uses is as follows:
• Parcel 1 ..... Existing Retail ........................................... (Type 1)
• Parcel 2 ..... Proposed Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive -up ... (Type II)
• Parcel 3 ..... Proposed Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive -up ... (Type II)
ITEM NO. 6
MEETING DATE 1/15/04
STAFF Steve Olt
City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Paradigm Properties, Overall Development Plan - #29-01A
APPLICANT: Hattman Associates
c/o Ric Hattman
145 West Swallow Road
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
OWNER: Paradigm Properties
P.O Box 3236
Ventura, CA. 93006-3236
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for approval of an Overall Development Plan (ODP) for permitted land
uses as defined in Section 4.17(B)(2) - Administrative Review and 4.17(B)(3) - Planning
and Zoning Board Review of the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC). The area for
the ODP is comprised of existing (Fort Collins Motor Sports) and proposed commercial
development on 24 acres located at the southeast corner of the Interstate 25 & Prospect
Road interchange. The proposed uses are lodging establishments, standard and fastfood
(with drive-ins) restaurants, office, retail, and convenience retail store with fuel sales. The
property is zoned C — Commercial.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Paradigm Properties, ODP complies with the applicable review criteria, including the C
- Commercial Zoning District standards, general development standards, street connectivity
standards; and, the adopted Master Street Plan, Boxelder Creek Drainage Master Plan,
and the 1-25 Subarea Plan.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT