The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFOSSIL LAKE ANNEXATION NO. 3 - 33-01B - CORRESPONDENCE - (3))US BOUNDARY Estak" p 71i4 S"g F'.. m 7 4 CAI= ww IF ty il� IF CJLj3O LOVELAND ON MR rq ai SCALE, I NOW 4 n on REVISION °CT Y._ COMMENT SHEET DATE: October 31, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #33-01, 33-01A, & 33-01B Fossil Lake Annexation #1, #2, & #3 — Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff review meeting: 75 November 14, 2001 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** .t: ©ti I'thvlek.3 W� i S i4-ere a +.. �ex-c#-}�%i i i S q n Kex� 2. -aautJ� ID.Rel HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVI 100ignature: _Plat site _ Drainage Report Other - _ _ Utility Redline Utility _ Landscape City of Fort Collins 19 I'd like to tentatively plan to take the item to the Planning and Zoning Board on the next available meeting date, which is January 3, 2002. The item will need to go to Council 3 times. I'd tentatively - like to schedule the initiating resolution for January 15, 2002, first reading for February 19, 2002, second reading for March 5, 2002. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dave Stringer 17 Change the term "town" to "city" on annexation #1 where it points at the hatched area of contiguity with existing city limits. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. ours Truly, Y� ,T OY ONES Ci �I nner 0 • L Page 2 6aSTAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins STAN EVERITT Date: 11/21/2001 C/O EVERITT COMPANIES 3030 S. COLLEGE FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for FOSSIL LAKE ANNEXATIONS #1, #2, & #3 - TYPE II (LUC), #33-01 B, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: City Attorney's Office Issue Contact: Paul Eckman Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Troy Jones 18 All 3 annexation maps show slightly incorrect land ownerships in the area south of Fossil Creek Reservoir. Please see the redlined plan of Annexation No. 1 from Doug Moore of the Natural Resources Department for clarification. 20 The Annexations No. 1 and No. 2 depict their area by a gray tone, while No. 3 only uses a thick line. Please make all three consistent. 21 The hatching that is used on annexation No. 3 should be changed. That type of hatching is generally used off -site of the property being annexed to show contiguity to city limits. You are showing it on - site, which adds to confusion. Please put this hatching off -site. 22 Item A.8. on the petition for all three annexations states, "more than 50% of the landowners in the area are subject to a covenant running with the land which affirmatively consents to the annexation." Annexations #1 and #2 have the language about the covenant, but at the time the petition was signed, didn't Everline LLC actually constitue 100% of the nrnnarty nwnars of tha first and second annexation areas? If this is the case. the lanauaae for both Page 1