Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PARADIGM PROPERTIES - ODP - 29-01A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY
APPENDIX F 1 ¢¢ 1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/E. Fror' ge Road , Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other arc Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: F rt Collins Period: /ic pm Year long bkgrd total Project D: 0225 ' E/W St: Prospect Road N/S'St: East Frontage Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound Southbound I ' I L T R I L T R L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L TR I Volume 125 480 300 1175 655 110 1385 25 90 175 50 20 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 ' EB Left A P 1 NB Left A A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P I Right A A Peds X I Peds X ' WB Left A A P I SB Left A A Thru A P 1 Thru A Right A P I Right A Peds X 1 Peds X , NB Right 1 EB Right A A SB Right 1 WB Right A Green 6.0 4.0 46.0 6.0 10.0 18.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 ' All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate , Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 321 1770 0.09 0.54 14.6 B T 857 1863 0.62 0.46 23.8 C 17.3 B R 1061 1583 0.31 0.67 7.1 A Westbound L 415 1770 0.47 0.57 14.5 B , T 932 1863 0.78 0.50 24.9 C 21.0 C R 966 1583 0.13 0.61 8.3 A Northbound ' L 481 1770 0.89 0.35 49.3 D TR 460 1644 0.28 0.28 28.4 C 44.5 D Southbound , L 388 1770 0.21 0.26 29.0 C TR 321 1784 0.24 0.18 35.6 D 32.2 C Intersection Delay = 25.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive , Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com , OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-W?. STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/10/02 Analysis Time Period: am Prospect/RT-in/RT-out 'Intersection: Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: on total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: RT-in/RT-out Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments a Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 805 215 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 884 236 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No 1 1 'Lanes Configuration T R Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (8) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? 'RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Storage 20 0.90 22 2 0 No 1 R .3 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 1 R I 14.3 B 22 410 0.05 0.17 14.3 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b 1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1 ¢► HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY )P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5110/02 Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: Prospect/RT-in/RT-out Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: on total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: RT-in/RT-out Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 775 200 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 861 222 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration T R Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound — Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' Lane Config I R I v (vph) 33 C(m) (vph) 414 ' v/c 0.08 95% queue length 0.26 Control Delay 14.4 LOS B Approach Approach Delay 19.4 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich , Matthew J. Delich, P.E. nu6zuuu: Jignaiizea inzersecLiuiiJ 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/I-25 Ramp Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P., Area Type: All other a es Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am Year on bkgrd total Project ID: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: I-25 NB Ramp SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ' I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I J I I No. Lanes I 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 I 0 0 0 1 LGConfig I L T I T R I L R I I Volume 1365 720 I 750 145 1595 300 1 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 I RTOR Vol 1- I 0 1 0 I I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ' EB Left A P I NB Left A Thru A P I Thru Right I Right A Peds X I Peds X ' WB Left I SB Left Thru P I Thru Right P I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green' 10.0 48.0 32.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 414 1770 0.96 0.59 48.3 D T 2053 3539 0.38 0.58 11.4 B 23.8 C ' Westbound T 1699 'R 1346 Northbound L 1133 3539 0.49 0.48 18.7 B 1583 0.12 0.85 1.3 A 3433 0.58 0.33 28.6 C 15.9 B 29.8 C 'R 507 1583 0.66 0.32 32.4 C Southbound ' Intersection Delay = 23.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 37 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 5/10/02 Period: a pm Project D: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect/I-25 NP -amp Area Type: All other art Jurisd: F t Collins Year on bkgrd tota NIS St: I-25 NB Ramp SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 2 0 I 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 I 0 0 0 1 LGConfig I L T I T R I L R I I Volume 1190 665 1 870 190 1775 310 1 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 I RTOR Vol I 1 0 1 0 1 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left A Thru A P 1 Thru Right 1 Right A Peds X I Peds X WB Left I SB Left Thru P 1 Thru Right P 1 Right Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB. Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 6.0 48.0 36.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 300 1770 0.68 0.55 20.9 C T 1911 3539 0.37 0.54 13.4 B 15.1 B Westbound T 1699 3539 0.57 0.48 20.0- B 16.5 B R 1409 1583 0.15 0.89 0.7 A Northbound L 1270 3433 0.68 0.37 28.0 C 28.0 C R 570 1583 0.60 0.36 28.0 C Southbound Intersection Delay = 20.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 3 CK h�:6zuuu: oignaiizeo intersecLions rexca6e �.�. 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/I-25 Ramp Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P. Area Type: All other as Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: amso Year :(lon bkgrd otal Project ID: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road NIS St: I-25 SB Ramp SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 0 2 1 I 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 LGConfig I T R I L T I I L R I Volume I 865 850 1230 1115 I 1220 230 1 Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 1 'RTOR Vol I 0 1 I 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ' Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru P I Thru Right P I Right Peds X I Peds X ' WB Left A P I SB Left A Thru A P I Thru Right I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 48.0 36.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 1699 3539 0.53 0.48 19.3 B 10.9 B R 1409 1583 0.63 0.89 2.3 A Westbound L 320 1770 0.80 0.55 28.4 C T 1911 3539 0.65 0.54 17.1 B 19.0 B ' Northbound ' Southbound L 655 1770 0.37 0.37 23.4 C 24.2 C ' R 570 1583 0.45 0.36 25.0 C Intersection Delay = 15.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich 1 Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS (970) 669-5034 -�? Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E Date: 5/10/02 Period: pm m Project D: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect/I-25 SB Ramp Area Type: All other arc Jurisd: Fort Collins Year long bkgrd total NIS St: I-25 SB Ramp SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I 0 2 1 I I 1 2 0 I I I 1 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 1 LGConfig I T R I L T I I L R I Volume I 640 555 1290 1335 I 1215 350 1 Lane Width I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol ( 0 1 1 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru P I Thru Right P I Right Peds X ( Peds X WB Left A P I SB Left A Thru A P I Thru Right I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right WB Right Green 6.0 48.0 36.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Ea T 1699 3539 0.42 0.48 17.7 B 10.0+ B R 1409 1583 0.44 0.89 1.2 A Westbound L 389 1770 0.83 0.55 39.2 D T 1911 3539 0.78 0.54 20.3 C 23.7 C Northbound Southbound L 655 1770 0.36 0.37 23.3 C 27.8 C R 570 1583 0.68 0.36 30.5 C Intersection Delay = 19.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS (970) 669-5034 HCSZuuu: ,�ignaiizea inLersecLions nei=m6� 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/W. Fr age Road Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P._ Area Type: All other a .s Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: F Collins Period: am Year Eon bkgrd otal Project ID: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: West Frontage Road ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 I 2 1 1 1 'LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L TR I L T R I Volume 1205 1230 20 150 865 430 120 10 60 1425 10 280 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 'RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left A. A Thru P I Thru A Right P 1 Right A Peds X I Peds X X WB Left A P I SB Left A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P I Right A A Peds X I Peds X X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A A Green 6.0 46.0 6.0 10.0 22.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 298 1770 0.77 0.53 27.2 C TR 1624 3531 0.86 0.46 30.0 C 29.6 C Westbound L 233 1770 0.23 0.53 19.1 B T 1628 3539 0.57 0.46 21.1 C 16.8 B 1061 1583 0.43 0.67 7.9 A 'R Northbound L 464 1770 0.05 0.30 24.9 C TR 357 1623 0.22 0.22 32.3 C 30.6 C Southbound L 584 3433 0.81 0.17 48.2 D T 596 1863 0.02 0.32 23.3 C 37.1 D R 681 1583 0.46 0.43 20.7 C ' Intersection Delay = 26.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Matthew J Matthew J 2272 Glen Loveland, HCS2000 Delich Delich, P.E. Haven Drive CO 80538 Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS (970) 669-5034 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E Date: 5/10/02 Period: am pm Project D: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect/W. Fror' ge Road Area Type: All other art Jurisd: Fort Collins Year ong bkgrd otal N/S St: West Frontage Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes I 1 I I I 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 I 2 1 1 1 LGConfig I L TR 1 L T R I L TR I L T R 1 Volume 1200 820 10 130 1220 435 110 10 50 1325 10 115 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A P I NB Left A A Thru A P I Thru A Right A P I Right A Peds X I Peds X X WB Left A P SB Left A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P 1 Right A A Peds X I Peds X X NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right A A 1 WB Right A A Green 6.0 4.0 48.0 6.0 6.0 20.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 305 1770 0.73 0.59 32.6 C TR 1837 3533 0.50 0.52 15.8 B 19.1 B Westbound L 404 1770 0.08 0.56 10.6 B T 1699 3539 0.80 0.48 25.9 C 21.3 C R 1029 1583 0.47 0.65 9.2 A Northbound L 436 1770 0.03 0.28 26.1 C TR 326 1629 0.21 0.20 33.7 C 32.6 C Southbound L 446 3433 0.81 0.13 53.0 D T 484 1863 0.02 0.26 27.6 C 43.8 D R 649 1583 0.20 0.41 19.1 B Intersection Delay = 24.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS (970) 669-5034 -54- APPENDIX E 33 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew Date: 5/10/02 Period: am Project ID: 0225 E/W St: Prospect No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: Prospect/E. Fron-ge Road J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other arc Jurisd: Fort Collins Year on kgr total Road N/S St: East Frontage Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I I L T R I L T R I L TR I L TR I 140 585 65 170 440 75 145 20 95 190 20 30 1 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1, 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X WB Left A P I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 54.0 30.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 474 1770 0.09 0.61 9.4 A T 1006 1863 0.64 0.54 19.3 B 17.9 B R 855 1583 0.08 0.54 11.3 B Westbound L 366 1770 0.21 0.61 11.9 B T 1006 1863 0.49 0.54 16.0 B 14.9 B R 855 1583 0.10 0.54 11.4 B Northbound L 403 1300 0.12 0.31 24.9 C TR 489 1631 0.26 0.30 26.9 C 26.3 C Southbound , L 373 1202 0.27 0.31 26.4 C TR 509 1695 0.11 0.30 25.4 C 26.0 C Intersection Delay = 18.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B , HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b ' Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive ' Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com , OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 3Z ncJLUUU: J1gna11ZCU 111 c1Jc uao cicu 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/E. Fr- Cage Road Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P. Area Type: All other a .s ' Date• 10/02 Jurisd: Fort C ins Period: a pm Year on kgrd total ' ProjectOD' 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: East Frontage Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L TR I Volume 110 465 55 1105 685 110 120 10 75 175 10 20 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ' EB Left A P I NB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X ' WB Left A A P I SB Left A Thru A P I Thru A Right A P Right A Peds X I Peds X ' NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 4.0 50..0 30.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 348 1770 0.03 0.58 12.5 B T 932 1863 0.55 0.50 19.7 B 18.9 B R 792 1583 0.08 0.50 13.2 B 'Westbound L 475 1770 0.25 0.61 10.8 B T 1006 1863 0.76 0.54 21.2 C 18.8 B R 855 1583 0.14 0.54 11.5 B 'Northbound L 411 1326 0.05 0.31 24.3 C TR 485 1616 0.19 0.30 26.2 C 25.8 C 'Southbound L 389 1255 0.21 0.31 25.8 C TR 503 1676 0.07 0.30 25.0 C 25.6 C ' Intersection Delay = 19.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 ' Phone: (971) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ' 31 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 5/10/02 Period: amcpnP Project ID: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect/I-25 NB "amp Area Type: All other are Jurisd: F t Collins Year dona kar ,total N/S St: I-25 NB Ramp SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 I I I 1 2 0 1 I 0 0 0 I LGConfig I L T I T R I L R I I Volume 1365 530 I 430 85 1660 160 1 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 i 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 I RTOR Vol 1 I 0 1 0 1 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left A Thru A P I Thru Right I Right A Peds X I Peds X WB Left I SB Left Thru P I Thru Right P I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 6.0 50.0 34.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 515 1770 0.77 0.57 27.3 C T 1982 3539 0.29 0.56 11.6 B 18.0 B Westbound T 1770 3539 0.27 0.50 14.8 B 12.5 B R 1409 1583 0.07 0.89 0.7 A Northbound L 1202 3433 0.61 0.35 27.8 C 27.2 C R 538 1583 0.33 0.34 24.9 C Southbound Intersection Delay = 20.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 30 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 5/10/02 Period: am Project ID: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect/I-25 SF imp Area Type: All other arc Jurisd: Fort C(allins Year ong bkgra) total NIS St: I-25 SB Ramp SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes I I I I I I ( 1 0 1 I 0 2 1 I 1 2 0 I 0 0 0 LGConfig ( T R I L T I I L R I Volume 1 790 850 1135 955 I 1105 295 1 Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru P 1 Thru Right P I Right Peds X I Peds X WB Left A P I SB Left A Thru A P I Thru Right I Right A Peds X ( Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 48.0 36.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS T 1699 3539 0.48 0.48 18.6 B 10.1 B R 1409 1583 0.63 0.89 2.3 A Westbound L 347 1770 0.43 0.55 13.7 B T 1911 3539 0.56 0.54 15.5 B 15.3 B Northbound Southbound , L 655 1770 0.18 0.37 21.4 C 25.7 C R 570 1583 0.58 0.36 27.3 C ' Intersection Delay = 14.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B . HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b ' Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive ' Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Z% nu6zuuu: signa-Lizen Acoi =.--. Michael Inter.: Prospect/I-25 �- Ramp 'Analyst: Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.. Area Type: All other a .s Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: pm Year on bkgr total Project ID: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: I-25 SB Ramp SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I ' I L T R I L T R I L T R I L I T R I I No, Lanes I 0 I I 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 LGConfig I T R I L T I I L R I Volume I 520 555 1210 1195 175 405 1 Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 I I 0 1 ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3, 4 1 5 6 7 8 ' EB Left r NB Left Thru P I Thru "I Right P Right Peds X I Peds X WB Left A P I SB Left A Thru A P I Thru Right I Right A Peds X I Peds X ' NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 48.0 36.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate 4 Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound T 1699 3539 0.34 0.48 16.7 B 8.7 A R 1409 1583 0.44 0.89 1.2 A 'Westbound L 446 1770 0.52 0.55 13.6 B T 1911 3539 0.69 0.54 18.1 B 17.4 B ' Northbound .r 'Southbound L 655 1770 0.13 0.37 20.9 C 33.6 C ' R 570 1583 0.79 0.36 36.0 D Intersection Delay = 16.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. '2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 1 2,1 ticszuuu: oigna1izea lllLeiS t'C i:i Uit zi ncaca.�o �.�. 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/W. Fr tage Road Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P. Area Type: All other as Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: F t o lins Period: am m Year lon bkgr total IProject 0225 .E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: West Frontage Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R 11 L T R I L T R I I I No. Lanes I I I I 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L TR I L T R I Volume 1200 720 10 130 1150 420 110 10 50 1305 10 115 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A P I NB Left A A Thru A P I Thru A Right A P I Right A Peds X I Peds X X WB Left A P I SB Left A A Thru P I Thru A A Right P Right A A Peds X Peds X X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A A I WB Right A A Green 6.0 4.0 48.0 6.0 6.0 20.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 305 1770 0.73 0.59 32.1 C TR 1837 3532 0.44 0.52 15.1 B 18.8 B Westbound L 444 T 1699 R 1029 Northbound L 436 TR 326 Southbound 1770 0.07 0.56 3539 0.75 0.48 1583 0.45 0.65 1770 0.03 1629 0.21 L 446 3433 0.76 T 484 1863 0.02 R 649 1583 0.20 Intersection Delay = 22.9 Matthew J. 'Matthew J. 2272 Glen Loveland, 10.3 B 24.3 C 20.0+ C 9.0 A 0.28 26.1 C 0.20 33.7 C 32.6 C 0.13 49.5 D 0.26 27.6 C 40.8 D 0.41 19.1 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Delich Delich, P.E. Haven Drive CO 80538 tPhone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: (970).669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX D 1 Table 4-3 Fnrt Cnilins Mntnr Vphir-lp 1 nS Standards tlntersectionsl Land Use (from structure. plan) Commercial Other corridors within :corridors lntersectiort type' Moved use Low density mixed Al other districts use residential areas Signalized D E• D D intersections overall Stop sign control NIA F-" P. E (arterial/local--any approach leg) Stop sign control NIA C C C (collector/local— any approach leg) ' mitigating measures required " considered normal in an urban environment Page 4-22 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standard January 2,2001 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay seelveh A _< 10 B >10and<15 C > 15 and _< 25 D > 25 and < 35 E >35and<50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay seclveh A _< 10 B > 10 and _< 20 C > 20 and < 35 D > 35 and _< 55 E > 55 and _< 80 F > 80 ZZ HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b ' TWO -WA STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/10102 Analysis Time Period: amQPJm Intersection: Prospect/E. Frontage Road 'Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent long bkgrd total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: East Frontage Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 17 127 19 4 95 4 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 Flow Rate, HFR 18 139 20 4 ill 4- IHourly Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 22 3 6 0 8 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 3 7 0 9 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration ' Delay, Approach EB 'Movement 1 Lane Config LTR 0 1 0 LTR 0 1 0 LTR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 18 4 35 17 C(m) (vph) 1474 1420 656 715 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.02 95% queue length 0.04 0.01 0.17 0.07 Control Delay 7.5 7.5 10.8 10.2 A A B B 'LOS Approach Delay 10.8 10.2 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ?,' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO -WA ffOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael 'Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/10/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Prospect/I-25 NB Ramp Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen long bkgrd total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: I-25 NB Ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R ' Volume 206 138 112 12 .Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 Flow Rate, HFR 223 149 131 14 IHourly Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume 461 P, � 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 rf+�J 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 517 28 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 'Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 'Movement Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 223 517 28 (vph) 1437 328 898 'C(m) v/c 0.16 1.58 0.03 95% queue length 0.55 30.07 0.10 Control Delay 8.0 302.4 9.1 A F A 'LOS Approach Delay 287.4 Approach LOS F Southbound 11 12 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/10/02 Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: Prospect/I-25 NB Ramp Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen long bkgrd total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: I-25 NB Ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 67 99 132 27 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 72 106 155 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No --Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 630 21 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 A�eJ 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 741 24 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R 1 v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 12 741 24 1388 559 948 0.05 1.33 0.03 0.16 31.56 0.08 7.7 180.7 8.9 A F A 175.3 F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b ' TWO -WA jTOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael 'Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/10 02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: Pro pect/I-25 SB Ramp Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: rece t long bkgrd total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: I-25 SB Ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0 Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R ' Volume 331 670 34 537 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.88 0.88 Flow Rate, HFR 344 697 38 610 'Hourly Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 13 118 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 134 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 'Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 L R v (vph) 38 14 134 (vph) 668 151 494 'C(m) v/c 0.06 0.09 0.27 95% queue length 0.18 0.30 1.09 Control Delay 10.7 31.3 15.0- LOS B D B Approach Delay 16.5 Approach LOS C 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b 'Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E: �� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY )P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/10/02 Analysis Time Period pm Intersection: rospect/I-25 SB Ramp Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecent long bkgrd total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: I-25 SB Ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 162 414 48 713 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 180 460 55 619 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 243 Peak Hour PHF a% 0.85 Hourly Flowactor, Rate, HFR kIDV..) 2855 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I I L R v (vph) 55 5 285 C(m) (vph) 944 158 375 v/c 0.06 0.03 0.76 95% queue length 0.19 0.10 6.14 Control Delay 9.0 28.5 39.3 LOS A D E Approach Delay 39.1 Approach LOS E HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 16 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.io ' TWO-WT STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 'Date Performed: 5/10/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Prospect/W. Frontage Road Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen long bkgrd total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: West Frontage Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R 'Volume 57 974 3 2 624 29 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 63 1082 3 2 663 30 Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 'Percent Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 0 4 23 0 120 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0:88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 4 26 0 136 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (1) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? 'Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR 'Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 'Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 63 2 9 162 C(m) (vph) 902 643 48 187 0.07 0.00 0.19 0.87 'v/c 95% queue length 0.22 0.01 0.61 6.39 Control Delay 9.3 10.6 96.6 85.9 LOS A B F F Approach Delay 96.6 85.9 Approach LOS F F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b 'Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY )P CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/10/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: rospect/W. Frontage Road Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecen long bkgrd total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: West Frontage Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R volume 60 567 2 3 922 31 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 67 637 2 3 1084 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (�) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 5 2 3 6 U 2/ 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 5 2 3 7 0 31 2 2 2, 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 67 3 10 3d C(m) (vph) 624 945 61 139 v/c 0.11 0.00 0.16 0.27 95% queue length 0.36 0.01 0.54 1.04 Control Delay 11.5 8.8 75.3 40.4 LOS B A F E Approach Delay 75.3 40.4 Approach LOS F E HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 11 APPENDIX C 0 Start Time I Left I Thru Intersectio 04:15 PM n Volume 0 8 7 Percent 0.0 53.3 46.7 High InL 04:15 PM Volume 0 2 3 Peak Factor ATD Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO.80400i{e Name Site Code Start Date Page No [ Left � 7ru .-wt Total PM - Peak 1 of 1 15 4 97 4 3.8 92.4 3.8 04:30 PM 5 1 27 2 0.750 :EFRONT&PROSPECTPM :99923778 : 02/07/2002 :2 Pigh I h I l Int. Left Thru � � left -M t Total Total 105 24 3 6 33 16 123 16 157 310 72.7 9.1 18.2 10.2 78.3 11.5 05:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:15 30 4 0 1 5 5 33 5 43 83 0.847 0.589 0.913 0.934 out on Total 23 f5 O 7 e o Rill Th6 Left 4' 1 L+ �0 NoM a b 02167/ =16.15 , - 3 0 62767=2 V.w lun3muda I T FO Left Thu Rigm �3 6 ® 33 oW in TOW EAST FRONTAGE Ro 12 u•. iJi uc iu. ii rn a, u 4o4 uauo 1RL JLtf!\-OhV•� . V��V.-� ATD Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO.80488e Name : EFRONT&PROSPECTAMI Site Code : 99923778 Start Date : 02/07/2002 Page No : 2 EAST FRONTAGE RD PROSPECT EAST FRONTAGE RD PROSPECT Eastbound e bglAG �9h APP• WestbourW �9h Northbound Thru Rlgh left Thru Rgh APP. Int. , Start Time Left Thru t Total left Thru t Total Left t Total t Total Total ' Peak hour From ui:uu Am Co uo:"D M" - Intersectio 07:00 AM Volume 4 3 5 12 4 149 Percent 33.3 25.0 41.7 2.5 94.3 High Int. 07:15 AM 07:45 AM Volume 1 2 2 5 1 39 Peak Factor 0.600 5 158 4 0 4 3.2 50.0 0.0 50.0 07.00 AM 1 41 1 0 0 0.878 8 2 100 17 119 297 1.7 84.0 14.3 07:15 AM 07:15 1 0 30 5 35 82 0.667 0.850 0.905 7 Out in Total 12 r is �5 31 4 Right Thm Loft 4J 1 L+ N 11 S NorM m r � 8 � _♦ ozro7rmoz or:og �— � � � � 02107r2002 07:45 m ^ Unsidlle0 � T F+ Lift Thru Right 41 01 , 24 6 32 Out In Total EASTFRONTAGERD AM Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO.80403 File Name : 25NB&PROSPECTPM Site Code : 99923778 Start Date : 02/06/2002 Page No : 2 IZS N8 PROSPECT 1,0 NE PROSPECT Westbound Ncnhbomd Eastbound start Time left Sount Thru o uld left Thru wit Tonal Left ThrV R 9 L Total Left Int. Thru Total 11 Total t Total Peak Hour "om u9:Uu rM [O V3:47 rr1 - rCen a ua Intersectio 04:45 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 108 11 219 465 2 26 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90.8 9.2 94.3 0.4 5.3 High Int. 3,45:00 PM 05:30 PM 05:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 22 5 27 128 1 8 Peak Factor 0.850 493 208 142 0 350 962 59.4 40.6 0.0 04:45 PM 05:15 137 52 41 0 93 257 0.887 0.921 0.936 NoM 0 lot M i '- _♦ 0 21 02 17= � Um1�514d 4,Tr Left ,,,n Rwd 405 2 26 L_J 493 493 Out In Total 125 NO U4/ 10, UL l u; 11 CAA y 1 u 40L UJUO ...l L`r; .UL'.�1\ UAu❑.. , v�\u... ATD Services, Inc. 6214 Sec rest Street Arvada, CO.80403 File Name : 25NB&PROSPECTAM Site Code : 99923778 Start Date : 02106/2002 Page No : 2 125 NB PROSPECT II 125 NB PROSPECT Northbound East M Souttrbautd �9 APP, West bound w9h 'w' Rlgh App. Left Thru Rlgh Left Thru Int. StartTune Left Thru t Total t I Left Thru t Total t Total t Total Totai ' PeaK now nom ur:w mm w —o 4 intersectio 07:00 AM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 132 27 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.0 17.0 ' High Int. 6:45:00 AM 07:45 AM volume 0 0 0 0 0 34 7 Peak Factor A01,9M a� � 'Di --I, 159 635 1 22 658 65 99 0 164 981 96.5 0.2 3.3 39.6 60.4 0.0 07:30 AM 07.30 AM 07:30 41 189 1 5 195 20 24 0 44 280 0.846 0.844 0.932 0.876 T NaAh O7/I18r20n2 ofoo 0uo150"M207AS unstmla +►Tr Lett Thou ass 1 22 at to Toni 123 Ka AT O N 6 S M Vti'101 VL lU.xv 1`[L DIV Itu- UJVu lLLl. Jl..'11\-Ll\V!l.• U1\v�♦ .L vu.. ..� ATD Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO.80403 File Name : 25SB&PROSPECTPM Site Code : 99923778 Start Date : 02/06/2002 Page No : 2 Start Time left ThN �9h r Tl,rai -- left Thru w9h t Tofal Left Thti 'I I APP' I LTOtat Left I Thru I R l t I �' { Total 1nC Total eak Hour from 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio 04:45 PM n Volume 13 0 135 148 32 537 0 559 0 0 0 0 0 324 629 953 1670 Percent 8.8 0.0 91.2 5.6 94A 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 66.0 05:30 High Int. 05:30 PM 05:30 PM 3:45:00 PM 0 05:00 PM 0 63 159 242 446 Volume 4 0 38 42 12 150 0 162 0 0 0 0.961 0.936 Peak Factor 0.881 0.878 - oLd In TOW 1{8 ufi 135 01 19 Ri0td Thn Left '4'1L+ T Hp61 0 1e:4s OT108r2002 n30 Vlq�llft� T F* Loft Thu RIOM a e 0 5-6-11 0 861 out h TOW Rs ss r-� u=ar io uc io. lu inn b l u 40c o�)00 . Ii JGAh-DAUIIW%V ,i ATD Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO. 80403 File Name : 25SB&PROSPECTAM Site Code : 99923778 . Start Date : 02/06/2002 Page No : 2 Startllme Left ThN t ADD• Total left Thru - t Total Left Thru Wgh t Total Left Thru Righ � [ ADD, i Totai [nC Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio 07:30 AM n Volume 4 1 241 246 46 709 0 755 0 0 0 0 0 164 404 568 1569 Percent 1.6 0.4 98.0 6.1 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.9 71.1 07:30 High Int 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 6:45:00,AM 0 08:00 AM 0 38 98 Volume 3 1 70 74 10 206 0 216 0 0 0 0.136 0,426 Peak Factor 0.831 0.874 2568 put to TOW =0 246 110 241 1 4 RWd Thv LOA 4tj 1 L* 12 0 � T Q o MI mo s _—♦ O1,GOr1002 0T:20 ,---- � � g �" 02Mfir2 0206AS o gg S � UmhRed 64 T F+ Left T1w RIOM 0 0 0 451 0 451 Out in TOW 12658 7 ATD Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO.804031e Name Site Code Start Date Page No :WFRONT&PROSPECTPM :99923778 : 02/07/2002. :2 WEST FRONTAGE RD PROSPECT WEST FRONTAGE RD PROS T Wgh Left Thru Rgh Left --- Thru �9h �' LeR Thn Righ App. Int. Total Total Start Time Left Thou t Total t Total t Total t Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - PeaK 1 OT 1 Intersecho 05:00 PM n Volume 25 0 120 145 2 608 27 637 5 0 4 9 57 960 3 3020 1811 Percent 17.2 0.0 82.6 0.3 95.4 4.2 55.6 0.0 44.4 5.6 94.1 0.3 High Int. 05:15 PM 05:15 PM 05:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 Volume 6 0 30 38 0 156 8 166 2 0 0 2 18 263 1 282 488 Peak Factor 0.884 0.942 0.563 0.904 0.928 WESTfRONTAGE RD Out In TOW ® t t 0 25 R1pld Thu Loll *j1L+ Nam s o s 0u7ao02 +1'.45 UMhVod +iTr Left Tlw Riot 61 01 4 © i 14 Out in TOW WEST FRONTAGE RD We V4, la, U4 10.UV me VIV 40, UJVO ll1r. ATE) Services, Inc. 6214 Secrest Street Arvada, CO.804631e Name : WFRONT&PROSPECTAM Site Code : 99923778 Start Date : 02/07/2002 Page No : 2 Start7lme ..,„ left Thru t APP Total Left' Rigt Total LeR i11ru U�t Tonal Left Thru Wg[ TAotaRl Int. Total eak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio 07:15 AM n Volume 6 0 27 33 3 926 33 962 5 2 3 10 60 574 2 636 1641 Percent 18.2 0.0 81.8 0.3 96.3 3.4 50.0 20.0 30.0 9.4 90.3 0.3 High M. 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 Volume 0 0 4 4 1 274 8 283 1 1 2 4 13 130 0 143 434 Peak Factor 0.688 0.8501 0.625 0.893 0.945 Wlibl l-HVN IAVt 1W pW in Total ® ss +ze m 0 s Riplrt Twu Left +j1L+ T Nt 0, 02l07I2002 07:15 0210112W 01:00 unstifted 4,TF+ Len TNu Rtprt s z a (—s5 to F is Out it TOW WESTFRONTAGERD APPENDIX B 1 1 4 � Attachment "B" Transportation Impact Study Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet Origin .Otherm; (Project Site) Recreation�� `E 'RestdenhaI F II15titlltiiDIl '(school;=�3 s church; ;civic) OfficelBusin* ess Gommecial , N Industnat , Other (specify) ' List the pedestrian destinations within 1320' (1.5 miles for schools) of the project boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian Level of Service for the facility/corridor linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity, types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and security of the selected route(s). Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 3 No Text SCALE: 1"=1000' PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA Attachment "A" Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project lnformation . ;- Project Name QApA)(;M ?RoPeeTiEs Project Location $E eoRu6e dF �'-2 S �RoSPEGT TIS As um ti©ns Type of Study Full: Intermediate: ti p Study Area Boundaries North: �20 3 A6C-r South: East: CA s C `'12. iE� A O West: WG S-r FL. p#Ab Study Years Short Range: cv T, s "V Long Range 020 Future Traffic Growth Rate P46R 40T FfZ& rAG icAN Study Intersections 1. All access drives 5• ?Qo,petT E.F. 2. �jQpSPCsGT%�/. F. 6. 3. PleoSp&rr j?a.HpS 7. 4. p0SPcvcT/A1S 12AgA PS 8. Time Period for Study AM: 7:00- P : 4:00-6:0 Sat Noon:,vo Trip Generation Rates Pep- 7 Tt: Trip Adjustment Factors Passby: P&p ZTE Captive lAmaR AjA c, Market: k/0m At/A c- Overall Trip Distribution Ar C C-D North South East West Mode Split Assumptions AIIA Committed Roadway Improvements ASSUME 1m?jZovBm&Ajrs To /AurdrRcj,A S4µicAR To AARNeNY Other Traffic StudiesTaz fl Areas Requiring Special Study —1;. Date: $/ t / O 2 Traffic Engineer: Local Entity Engi Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 2 1 APPENDIX A The Fort Collins policy regarding adequate public facilities is that if a development generates less than 10,000 trip ends per day, the subject intersection must be less than one mile from the site to be an adequate public facilities concern. The Paradigm Property is greater than one mile from the Prospect/Timberline intersection. At full development (Table 2), the trip generation will be greater than 10,000 trip ends per day. However, a significant number of these trip ends will be oriented to/from I-25. In addition to this, a PDP proposal for the Paradigm Property would likely be for a portion of the ODP site, which would generate less than 10,000 trip ends per day. Therefore, it is not likely that a PDP proposal for the Paradigm Property would have an adequate public facilities issue pertaining to the Prospect/Timberline intersection. There is currently an engineering study underway for improvement to Prospect Road between the Cache la Poudre River and Summitview Drive. This is currently a two-lane road segment with a rural cross section. That engineering study is evaluating an improved two-lane cross section and the ultimate four -lane cross section. This will present an opportunity for improved operation in this segment of Prospect Road and at the Prospect/Summitview intersection. It is expected that Prospect Road will have a four -lane cross section, as shown on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan, by/before the long range future. 20 appropriate to address pedestrian level of service in a master TIS. A detailed pedestrian level of service analysis will be provided in the PDP TIS. Bicycle Level of Service There are currently no bicycle destination areas within 1320 feet of the Paradigm Property. There are also no existing bicycle facilities within this area. The Fort Collins Bike Map shows that there will be on -street bike lanes along Prospect Road and along I-25. It is not appropriate to address bicycle level of service in a master TIS. A detailed bicycle level of service analysis will be provided in the PDP TIS. Transit Level of Service Currently, Collins Transit Transfort in th e In the scoping meeting for this transportation impact study, two issues were mentioned. These were: the adequate public facilities concern regarding the Prospect/Timberline intersection, and improvements to Prospect Road between the Cache la Poudre River and Summitview Drive. Based upon recent peak hour traffic counts at the Prospect/Timberline intersection, it has been determined that this intersection operates unacceptably. The transportation impact study guidelines indicate that significant impact is defined in Section 9.5.2.A.2 in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards," as follows: "When the background traffic conditions (without project traffic) causes an intersection to fail the minimum acceptable level of service standards; and when the project traffic causes more than a 2 percent increase in the intersection delay." As,has been recognized by the City of Fort Collins, the Prospect/Timberline intersection is currently geometrically deficient. It does not take much site generated traffic to cause a greater than 2 percent increase in delay at this intersection. It is expected that by/before the long range future (2025), there will be appropriate geometric improvements at the Prospect/Timberline intersection, such that it will operate acceptably. As such, this intersection will not present adequate public facilities concerns in the long range future. However, when a PDP proposal is put forth for any portion of the Paradigm Property, the Prospect/Timberline intersection may need to be analyzed at the condition that it exists at the time ofthat development proposal. 19 LO N w N N r C A& N .D 03 O � m U >N �C Prospect NO N N 0) 2m o! c H 0: LONG RANGE (2025) GEOMETRY f— - Denotes Lane Figure 9 TABLE 4 Long Range (2025) Total Peak Hour Operation K10, 7.,z, ProspectNVFR (signal) EB B c WB c B NB c c SB D D OVERALL c c Prospect/SB 1-25 Ramp (signal) EB B B WB c B SB c c OVERALL B B Prospect/NB 1-25 Ramp (signal) EB B c WB B B NB c c OVERALL c c Prospect/RT-in/RT-out (stop sign) NB RT B B ProspectIEFR (signal) EB B c WB c c NB D D SB F C c OVERALL c c 17 C N w N O N � 0 LL m FQ rn m o �m o � LL N �� �� N O o W o v N o u> o r o N 435/430 o h c o 110/75 1220/865 ��' N=-1335/1115 1N "' '� 655/405 J 30/50 / 290/230 190/145 8708 50 Prospect /� + 175/130 870/7 N 200l205 64555/8 —O 0/865 0 190/365 200/215 r 25/50 820/1230 -- 200/215 -0 0 0 665(720 -� o<n oo 0 480/595 0 0 Ln 10/20 o o N h o M 300/180 Ln N M Co Ln N 0) M N6� FQ m O m d o F- c H �— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles LONG RANGE (2025) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8 TABLE 3 Long Range (2025) Background Peak Hour Operation ------------- ME -W-IM41"o (signal) NB C C 16 M m O m N O1 w C O LL t O O 00 O c 420/415 M -� 1150/785 30l50 200/205 720/1170 10P20 0 O C) O `O 3 C M. N O� a1195/955 / /- 210/135 135/85 --*— 590/430 520/790 —► 555/850 190/365 405/530 --► h w Ir �(b LONG RANGE (2025) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4 N f0 O N 01 t�9 C O LL N m w O O � 110/75 Ln N n --a— 685/440 105170 Prospect ` f r 10/40 11 465/585 w o w 55/65 o o Ln N � n --w— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Figure 7 N ►� i N ` `— 13/15 y f- 66176 101 /60 —.- a4 0 �^ dL — 137/156 79/93 121/74 - — 259/187 —► SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 55/61 278/317 Prosl 243/114 —�► �/ 200/213 —y f N N t) Q O H C H Of N .0 N O 2 N O) C O LL N t0 W �— -31 /-34 72/59 22/10 f 15/10 —� 243/114 N o M �-- AM/PM Figure 6 E 25% 11 2 Z TRIP DISTRIBUTION m 0 LL W � rn o law N W O 01 O 0 r Prospect n*�% O / \ Z N� F� 1 Site 0 M NOTE: Passby traffic for appropriate land uses in the Paradigm Property is primarily related to 1-25 ramp traffic. Figure 5 TABLE 2 Trip Generation Parcel A 832 Sit-down Restaurant 6.5 KSF 130.34 1 850 4.82 31 4.45 29 6.52 42 4.34 28 Parcel B 832 Sit-down Restaurant 7.5 KSF 1 130.34 1 980 14.82 1 36 14.451 33 16.52 1 49 1 4.34 33 Parcel C 846 Gas/C-store 12 positions 1 152.84 1 1830 15.43 1 65 15.211 63 16.60 1 79 1 6.60 1 79 Parcel D 834 Fast-food Restaurant 3.6 KSF 496.12 1 1790 25.43 92 24.43 88 17A1 63 16.07 58 Parcel E 320 Motel 64 rooms 5.63 1 360 0.17 11 0.28 18 0.25 16 0.22 14 Parcel F 320 Motel 66 rooms 5.63 1 370 0.17 11 0.28 18 0.25 17 0.22 15 Parcel G 814 Specialty Retail 20.5 KSF 40.67 1 830 1.92 39 1.44 30 1.11 23 1.48 30 Parcel H 770 Office/Warehouse 24.6 KSF 12.76 1 310 1.20 30 0.23 6 0.30 7 0.99 24 Parcel 1 770 Office/Warehouse 32.7 KSF 12.76 1 420 1.20 39 0.23 8 0.30 10 0.99 32 Parcel J 814 Specialty Retail 16.1 KSF 40.67 650 1.92 31 1.44 23 1.11 18 1.48 24 *Parcel K 814 Specialty Retail 46.1 KSF 40.67 1870 1.92 89 1.44 66 1.11 51 1 1.48 T 68 Parcel L 770 Office/Warehouse 36.7 KSF 12.76 1 470 1.20 44 0.23 8 0.30 11 0.99 36 Parcel M 814 Specialty Retail 33.3 KSF 40.67 780 1.92 37 1.44 28 1.11 21 1.48 29 Total 11,510 555 418 407 470 10 E. SITE PLAN A& N NO SCALE Figure 4 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Paradigm Property is a commercial development, located east of Interstate 25 and south of Prospect Road in Fort Collins. Figure 4 shows a site plan of the Paradigm Property development. The development, at the ODP level, will consist of two sit-down restaurants, a fast-food restaurant, a gas/convenience store with 12 fueling positions, two motels, 116,000 square feet of retail, and 94,000 square feet of office/warehouse. The site plan shows that the site will be accessed via two site accesses to the EFR, and one RT-in/RT-out access to Prospect Road. Since this is an ODP level transportation impact study, a short range analysis was not required. The long range future was assumed to be the year 2025. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact, of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6t° Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected use at this site. Land use codes 832 (Sit-down Restaurant), 834 (Fast-food Restaurant), 846 (Gas/C-store), 320 (Motel), 814 (Specialty Retail), and 770 (Business Park) were used. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. It should be noted that passby trip factors were applied to various land uses within the Paradigm Property. Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the non-passby site generated trips was determined for the Paradigm Property based upon the existing traffic volumes, the location of trip productions for this type of land use, and engineering judgment. Figure 5 shows the trip distributions used for the following analyses. Passby trip adjustments were primarily applied to interstate ramp volumes. Background Traffic Projections Figure 6 shows the long range (2025) background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the long range future horizon were determined by reviewing traffic forecasts and traffic studies performed for other developments in this area of Fort Collins, review of forecasts in the "North Front Range Regional Transportation Plan, and contact with the North Front Range Transportation & Air Quality Planning Council. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are 8 TABLE 7 Current Peak Hour Operation �r�l! .�p.G Ck�}'u.' zM1.' �i�� � 2 1� I� a Fr xn `� ��fY� }5 �' i 4A 9'k` �*�I � YY' •TY� 'c.`4 L., �y ;�5:• ,c f v` _ . t. T] c �C Y , Prospect/WFR (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT F F SB LT/T/RT E F EB LT B A WB LT A B Prospect/SB 1-25 Ramp (stop sign) SB LT D D SB RT E B SB APPROACH E C WB LT A B Prospect/NB 1-25 Ramp (stop sign) NB LT F F NB RT A A NB APPROACH F F EB LT A A Prospect/EFR (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT A B SB LTfr/RT B B EB LT A A WB LT A A Existing Operation The key intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the volumes shown in Figure 3, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix C. The Prospect/SB I-25 Ramp and Prospect/EFR intersections operate acceptably during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. The Prospect/WFR and Prospect/NB I- 25 Ramp intersections operate unacceptably during the peak hours. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better overall. Acceptable operation at stop sign controlled intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service E for any approach leg. Pedestrian Facilities There are no sidewalks in this area of Fort Collins. Bicycle Facilities There are limited bicycle facilities along Prospect Road. There are limited bicycle facilities along the EFR and the WFR. Transit Facilities Currently, this area does not have transit service. 0 0 O LL w N 0 n o 31/29 J + 922/624 /,3/2 �l Ln 60/57 I I I 567/974 — 2/3 —� Q o v L a m in N a) 16 C a — 713/537 1 / 48/34 27/12 t y f 132/112 162/331 —� 414/670 67/206 99/138 —► e N N� F� O m d� 2m BALANCED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4 N �0 0 CU U- N ca W ea`oo lk-5/4 `In CO `r f 150/95 J /- 4/4 Prospect t 2/17 f 101/127 N M W 17/19 a a - w— AM/PM Figure 3 L0 N 67 w N N r-� C 'D N O W R k7 2LL Cn 49 O 0 CO �mo O In M n o 33/27 N w �— 926/608 N +- 709/537 /11 /r 3/2 / 46/32 27132/108 60/57 1 164— 574/1020 —404/604/629 208 ► / a M 99/14/142 —� zs pi 2/3 ry/GCID RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4 N O m w 0 U- N W Ca�oo �5/4 v' CO f 149/97 + � � 4/4 Prospect 2/16 lI 100/123 —.- 17/18 f- AM/PM Figure 2 PORT COLONS DOWNTOWN ARKK N Mulberry SH14 d y U rn S m c O Prospect Paradigm Property N cn 9 h q0 O SITE LOCATION SCALE: 1 "=3000' Figure 1 3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Paradigm Property site is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily residential, vacant, and commercial. Residential uses, exist to the north, across Prospect Road, and to the east. Commercial uses exist north and northwest of the site, along both the West Frontage Road and the East Frontage Road. There are intermittent vacant parcels of land between more active parcels. Some of these are in agricultural use. The center of Fort Collins lies to the west of the Paradigm Property. Roads The primary streets near the Paradigm Property site are Prospect Road, the West Frontage Road (WFR), the Southbound I-25 Ramp, the ' Northbound I-25 Ramp, and the East Frontage Road (EFR). Prospect Road is to the north of the Paradigm Property site. It is an east -west street designated as a four -lane arterial street on the Fort Collins ' Master Street Plan. Currently in this area, Prospect Road has a two- lane cross section. There are limited bicycle facilities on Prospect Road. The posted speed on Prospect Road, east and west of the I-25 ' Interchange, is 45 mph. At the I-25 Interchange, the posted speed on Prospect Road is 35 mph. At the key intersections, Prospect Road has single lane approaches. The EFR and WFR are approximately 1000 feet from the respective NB I-25 Ramp and SB I=25 Ramp. The Prospect/EFR and Prospect/WFR intersections have stop sign control on the EFR and WFR. The Frontage ' Roads have single lane approaches. The NB and SB I-25 Ramps intersect Prospect Road and are controlled by stop signs. The ramps have one lane approaches, however there are functional right -turn flares on each ramp. ' Existing Traffic Recent peak hour counts at the Prospect/WFR, Prospect/SB I-25 Ramp, Prospect/NB I-25 Ramp, and Prospect/EFR intersections are. shown in Figure 2. Raw traffic count data is provided in Appendix B. The traffic data at the key intersections was collected in February 2002. Since these counts were collected on different days, the traffic between the intersections was balanced and is shown in Figure 3. VA I. INTRODUCTION ' This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development known as the Paradigm Property. The Paradigm Property site is located ' east of Interstate 25 and south of Prospect Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project developer (Paradigm Property LLC), the project planner (Hattman & Associates), the Fort Collins Transportation Planning staff, and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff. This study generally conforms to the master transportation impact study (TIS) format set forth in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards, Chapter 4- Transportation Impact Study, January 2, 2001. This TIS is for an ' overall development plan (ODP) for the Paradigm Property. As such, it only covers full development of the=tiYp at the long range future (2Q25) When a preliminary development (PDP) for an actual land use(s) is proposed, then a TIS will be required that will evaluate the impacts of just that proposal. That TIS will analyze the impacts in the short range future. As long as the PDP proposal is in substantial agreement with the land uses contained in this master TIS, a long range analysis ' will not be necessary in the PDP TIS. The base assumptions form and related information are contained in Appendix A. The study involved the following steps: ' - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; ' - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; ' - Analyze signal warrants; Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 4 3. Balanced Recent Peak Hour Traffic .................... 5 4. Site Plan ............................................ 9 5. Trip Distribution .................................... 11 6. Long Range (2025) Background Peak Hour Traffic ....... 12 7. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ..................... 14 8. Long Range (2025) Total Peak Hour Traffic ............ 15 9. Long Range (2025) Geometry ........................... 18 APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form B Recent Peak Hour Traffic C Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions D Long Range Background Traffic Operation E Long Range Total Traffic Operation F Pedestrian/Bicycle Influence Area TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Roads................................................ 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 2 Existing Operation ................................... 6 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 6 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 6 Transit Facilities ................................... 6 III. Proposed Development ................................. 8 Trip Generation ...................................... 8 Trip Distribution ................................... 8 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 8 TripAssignment ...................................... 8 Signal Warrants ...................................... 13 Operation Analysis ................................... 13 Geometry............................................. 13 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 13 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 19 Transit Level of Service ............................. 19 Other Issues ......................................... 19 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 21 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 7 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 10 3. Long Range (2025) Background Peak Hour Operation ..... 16 4. Long Range (2025) Total Peak Hour.Operation ......... 17 THE PARADIGM PROPERTY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2002 Prepared for: Paradigm Properties, LLC P.O. Box 3236 Ventura, CA 93006-3236 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 OQ -"O J. sTt�9 w� IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Paradigm Property on the long range (2025) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. This is a master transportation impact study, as is appropriate at the overall development plan submittal. When any portion of the Paradigm Property is submitted as a preliminary development plan, a transportation impact study will be prepared. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: The development of the Paradigm Property is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full build -out, the Paradigm Property will generate approximately 11,510 daily motor vehicle trip ends, 973 morning peak hour motor vehicle trip ends, and 877 afternoon peak hour motor vehicle trip ends. Some of these will be passby trip ends. A significant portion of the trips will be oriented to/from I-25. Current operation at the Prospect/SB I-25 Ramp and Prospect/EFR intersections is acceptable. Current operation at the Prospect/ WFR and Prospect/NB I-25 Ramp intersections is unacceptable. Acceptable operation at an arterial/arterial signalized intersection during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better overall. Acceptable operation at stop sign controlled intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service E for any approach leg. Peak hour signal warrants are expected to be met by/before the long range (2025) future at all of the existing key stop sign controlled intersections. With the long range (2025) background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably. In the long range future, given full development of the Paradigm ' Property and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably. The long range geometry is shown in Figure 9. ' - Pedestrian and bicycle level of service analyses should be addressed at the time of a preliminary development plan submittal. ' At the present time, there are no pedestrian or bicycle destinations within 1320 feet of the Paradigm Property. This area is not served by Transfort, nor will it be served by Transfort in the future, according to the Fort Collins Transit Plan. 21 hus2uju: 61gnaiizeo inLersecLiva ,r,�ao= -, 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/I-25 ' Ramp Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P. Area Type: All other a es Date: 5 10/02 Jurisd: Fort Co lins Period pm Year ong kgr total Project ID: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road NIS St: I-25 NB Ramp SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ' I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 'LGConfig I L T I T R I L R I I Volume 1190 405 I 590 135 1815 125 1 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 I 'RTOR Vol 1 I 0 1 0 I I' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ' EB Left A P I NB Left A Thru A P I Thru Right I Right A Peds X I Peds X ' WB Left I SB Left Thru P 1 Thru Right P I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 6.0 48.0 36.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay.LOS Eastbound L 412 1770 0.50 0.55 13.4 B T 1911 3539 0.23 0.54 12.1 B 12.5 B ' Westbound T 1699 3539 0.39 0.48 17.3 B 14.2 B R 1409 1583 0.11 0.89 0.7 A Northbound L 1270 3433 0.71 0.37 28.9 C 28.1 C 'R 570 1583 0.24 0.36 22.7 C Southbound ' Intersection Delay = 19.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 ' E-mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 2� m_;6Z000: JignallzeQ Aol = I--- Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/E. Fr Cage Road Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P. Area Type: All other L as Date: 5/10/02 Jurisd: F t Collins �_ Period: am � Year long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0225 E/W St: Prospect Road NIS St: East Frontage Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L TR I Volume 150 595 180 1130 405 75 1460 40 115 170 45 30 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left A A A Thru P I Thru - A A Right P I Right A A Peds X I Peds X WB Left A P I SB Left A A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right A A SB Right I WB Right A Green 6.0 45.0 6.0 12.0 21.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 390 1770 0.14 0.52 13.8 B T 838 1863 0.78 0.45 30.4 C 24.1 C R 1076 1583 0.18 0.68 5.9 A Westbound L 249 1770 0.58 0.52 21.9 C T 838 1863 0.54 0.45 22.4 C 20.8 C 886 1583 0.09 0.56 10.3 B 'R Northbound L 555 1770 0.92 0.40 50.3 D TR 546 1655 0.32 0.33 25.4 C 44.0 D Southbound L 417 1770 0.19 0.29 26.6 -C TR 368 1752 0.23 0.21 33.1 C 29.9 C Intersection Delay = 29.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 4_ -% Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J Date: 5/10/02 Period: am/n�m7 Project ID: 225 E/W St: Prospect Inter.: Prospect/W. Fron- le Road Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other are Jurisd: t C ns Year long kgrd total Road NIS St: West Frontage Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T, R I L T R I No. Lanes I 1 I I 1 I I l 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L TR I L T R I Volume 1205 1170 20 150 785 415 120 10 60 1410 10 280 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P 1 NB Left A A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X X WB Left A P 1 SB Left A A Thru P 1 Thru A A Right P 1 Right A A Peds X 1 Peds X X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A A Green 6.0 46.0 6.0 10.0 22.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 326 1770 0.70 0.53 21.6 C TR 1624 3530 0.81 0.46 27.9 C 27.0 C Westbound L 233 1770 0.23 0.53 18.1 B T 1628 3539 0.51 0.46 20.2 C 16.0 B R 1061 1583 0.42 0.67 7.8 A Northbound L 464 1770 0.05 0.30 24.9 C TR 357 1623 0.22 0.22 32.3 C 30.6 C Southbound L 584 3433 0.78 0.17 46.5 D T 596 1863 0.02 0.32 23.3 C 35.8 D R 681 1583 0.46 0.43 20.7 C Intersection Delay = 25.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b ' Matthew J. Delich, Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive ' Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com ' OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS z�p the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 7 shows the site generated peak hour traffic assignment of The Paradigm Property. Figure 8 shows the long range (2025) total (site plus background) peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. It is expected that peak hour signal warrants will be met by/before the long range (2025) future at all of the key stop sign controlled intersections. Operation Analysis Capacity analyses were performed at the key intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the long range (2025) analysis. Using the traffic volumes shown , in Figure 6, the key intersections operate in the long range background condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8 and recommended geometrics, the key intersections operate in the long range total condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. ' Geometry The long range (2025) geometry is shown in Figure 9. This geometry assumes that the I-25/Prospect interchange will remain as a diamond interchange. The interchange itself would look similar to the I-25/Harmony interchange, except that the frontage roads would be further away from the ramps at the Prospect Road interchange. Other potential interchange configurations would be part of a regional undertaking and are beyond the scope of a TIS for a specific development. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Paradigm Property site. There is currently one pedestrian destination within a quarter mile of the Paradigm Property. This is the small commercial/industrial site to the south of the Paradigm Property. There are no pedestrian facilities along any of the streets/roads within the pedestrian influence area.. It is not 13 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY JP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/10/02 Analysis Time Period: a m Intersection: ospect/E. Frontage Road Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecent long bkgrd total Project ID: 0225 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: East Frontage Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 2 101 17 4 150 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 118 19 4 170 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 4 0 4 4 3 5 0.85 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 4 0 4 4 3 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No 1s RT Channelized? , Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ' Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 2 4 8 12 C(m) (vph) 1401 1447 748 702 , v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.05 Control Delay 7.6 7.5 9.9 10.2 LOS A A A B ' Approach Delay 9.9 10.2 Approach LOS A B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b , Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Zo