HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOSSIL LAKE PDP, 4TH FILING - PDP - 33-01G - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYIViultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual
LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle
Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet
level of service -connectivity
nwunnun actual proposed
base connectivity: C
specific connections to priority sites:
description of applicable
destination area within 1,320'
including address
fW
destination area
classification
(see text)
p. 20
City of Port Collins Transportation Master Plan
f
_
-�6
.r
r
., it,Y
•I
p'
r F
y_
t-
T
! �
......-
8
V
1 inch 99
I �
YyM1I i
1 2004 HIGH SCHOOL ROUTING PLAN
11
xr
a
p p:
L.
.>r •�
1
�>M hYrq.
lti
--
ti
'C .k
w
.� ♦ it J-r f7� -
• r ,
r r•+ .f (zTF ��
f F f ztm�.
1E'
. elf, 1
e
PRESTON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ROUTING PLAN
�I
e..
2002 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROUTING PLAN
Nialtimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 18
LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian
Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
project location classification: Sc woot. W At. K Ae EA (enter as many as apply)
description of applicable destination area level of service (minimum based on project location classification)
destination area within 1,320' classification
includin address see text) W
NiWA
B ( Whlneu ontlnwly nlee96 unvI). uImddn
i(��5'fOIV �CIg1fG�
iuSt�TuYtoU
Qt Ci f#- Sc tr-oo t.
®Wm10i i 1"IL I
ME ml M1016
mndlmnn
actual
— proposed
amilonnnn
actual
proposed
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
IViultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. 18
LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian
Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
project location classification: 450100L WALK AiZeA
(enter as many as apply)
l
description of applicable
destination area within 1,320'
including address
oFosslc. LbKC-7
Vll-1,Aire(
destination area
classification
(see text)
p
f.6 5 t �&d1Tq(
level of service (minimum based on project location classification)
N, n'�neu
:ouliuul iy
i aJ'r
8
bnerefl6
unudtln
u(url17
n L,,,,O„
a
a
a
13
actual
A
A
proposed
A
q
B
D
A
aZ
SgGe CRGEK
Nm4t2ve5T BARK
K6�06�JTrAL
n,ildnnnn
2
v
g
e
_
proposed
A
/�
p
�
q
P gGACT14S MG-1 CTL
f.�t06UTt
m dnnun
B
g
8
Q—
5
B
A
pmpose`I
A
/D)
A
3
A
a
ZOoz ccc�tEurKRY
�Jct{pp(
(gSTrTf)rr prJ
milonau„
g
B
1.
13
acnl;d
q
V
Q
proposed
/1
�/
_ 5
^
City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
1.0 mile
HARMONY ROAD
' Preston
Junior High
School
O
w
J
O
w
IV
0
1320' (0.25 miles)
DUCK:
LAKE
2004
High
School
FOSSIL CREEK
RESERVOIR
SCALE: 1"=Z000
PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA
Q
w
N
Qt
APPENDIX G
1
1
¢0 1
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersedtions Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: . Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/29 02
Analysis Time Period: am
Intersection: Zielger/Shallow Pond
1 Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent hor bkgrd total
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Shallow Pond Drive
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
2
3
1 4
5
6
L
T
R
I L
T
R
' Volume
65
1
110
120
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85,
0.93
0.93
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
76
1
118
129
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1 0
0
1
'Configuration
TR
LT
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
'
Movement
7
8
9
1 10
11
12
L
T
R
I L
T
R
Volume
1
bU
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.86
0.86
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
1
69
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
Grade M
0 0
'Percent
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
No
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0
0
Configuration
LR
' Delay,
Approach NB
Movement 1
' Lane Config
Queue Length, and Level of Service
SB Westbound Eastbound
4 1 7 .8 9 1 10 11 12
LT I LR I
v (vph)
118
70
C(m) (vph)
1522
973
v/c
0.08
0.07
95% queue length
0.25
0.23
Control Delay
7.6
9.0
A
A
'LOS
Approach Delay
9.0
Approach LOS
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
' Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: m pm
Intersection: ielger/Shallow Pond
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent hor bkgr otal
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Shallow Pond Drive
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
165
1
35
80
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.90
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
194
1
38
88
Percent Heavy Vehicles
--
--
2
-- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1 0
0
1
Configuration
TR
LT
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement 7
8
9
1 10
11 12
L
T
R
I L
T R
volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade M
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Approach
Movement
Lane Config
1
100
0.85
0.85
1
117
2
2
0 0
No
0 0
LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
NB SB Westbound Eastbound
1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
LT I LR I
v (vph)
38
118
C(m) (vph)
1378
844
v/c
b.03
0.14
95% queue length
0.09
0.49
Control Delay
7.7
10.0-
LOS
A
A
Approach Delay
10.0-
Approach LOS
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
3 rJ
'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Ketcher/Ziegler
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 6/24/02 Jurisd: Larimer Count
Period: am Year or bkgrd total
'Project ID: 0236
E/W St: Ketcher Road N/S St: Zielger Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
' I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I
LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
Volume 180 205 85 135 200 95 I50 55 25 1140 120 195 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
' EB Left A A P I NB Left A A
Thru A P I Thru A
Right A P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
' WB Left A P 1 SB Left A A
Thru P I Thru A
Right P 1 Right A
Peds X I Peds X
' NB Right A I EB Right A
SB Right A A 1 WB Right A
Green 6.0 4.0 42.0 6.0 32.0
Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
'Eastbound
L 587
1770
0.16
0.53
12.2
B
T 857
1863
0.28
0.46
16.9
B
14.3
B
R 902
1583
0.11
0.57
9.9
A
Westbound
L 628
1770
0.07
0.50
12.8
B
T 782
1863
0.30
0.42
20.2
C
17.1
B
R 839
1583
0.13
0.53
12.0
B
'Northbound
L 475
1770
0.12
0.39
19.5
B
T 596
1863
0.11
0.32
24.0
C
20.9
C
681
1583
0.04
0.43
16.6
B
'R
Southbound
L 497
1770
0.30
0.39
20.8
C
T 596
1863
0.22
0.32
25.0
C
20.0+
C
R 744
1583
0.28
0.47
16.4
B
Intersection Delay
= 17.6
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
Fax:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
(970) 669-5034
31
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date: 6/24/02
Period: pm
Project am 0236
E/W St: Ketcher Road
Inter.: Ketcher/Ziegler '
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: La imer Count
Year ort bkgr total
N/S St: Zielger Road '
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I, L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
LGConfig I L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I
Volume 1315 175 45 120 180 160 180 165 30 175 55 115 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A A P I NB Left A A
Thru A P I Thru A
Right A P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A P I SB Left A A
Thru P I Thru A
Right P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right A I EB Right A
SB Right A A I WB Right A
Green 6.0 4.0 42.0 6.0 32.0
Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 .3.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
L 619
1770
0.57
0.53
15.3
B
T 857
1863
0.23
0.46
16.4
B
15.2
B
R 902
1583
0.06
0.57
9.6
A
Westbound
L 662
1770
0.03
0.50
12.7
B
T 782
1863
0.25
0.42
19.6
B
16.1
B
R 839
1583
0.21
0.53
12.5
B
Northbound
L 497
1770
0.19
0.39
19.9
B
T 596
1863
0.32
0.32
26.1
C
23.3
C
R 681
1583
0.05
0.43
16.6
B
Southbound
L 426
1770
0.20
0.39
20.1
C
T 596
1863
0.10
0.32
24.0
C
18:8
B
R 744
1583
0.17
0.47
15.4
B
Intersection Delay
= 17.7
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b '
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive '
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com ,
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: pm
Intersection: etcher/Ziegler
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short bkgr tota
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Ketcher Road
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Volumes and Adjustment
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
Volume 1315 175 45 120 180 160 180 165 30 175 55 115 1
PHF 10.90 0.90 0.90 10.92 0.92 0.92 10.87 0.87 0.87 10.89 0.89 0.89 1
Flow Rate 1350 194 50 121 195 173 191 189 34 184 61 129 1
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
Approach Flow Rate 594 389 314
Conflicting Circulating Flow
166 630 628
Critical Gap and Follow-up Time
Critical Gap (sec):
Southbound ,
274
307 '
Upper bound
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
Lower bound
4.60
4.60
4.60
4.60
Follow-up Time (sec):
Upper bound
2.60
2.60
2.60
2.60
Lower bound
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
Results:
Capacity and
v/c Ratio
Capacity. (Eq. 10-124):
Upper bound
1216
840
842
1088
Lower bound
1008
672
673
892
v/c Ratio:
Upper bound
0.49
0.46
0.37
0.25
Lower bound
0.59
0.58
0.47
0.31
3 4-
hd, final value
7.44
7.07
7.50
7.11
8.17
7.79
7.51
6.94
x, final value
0.19
0.67
0.09
0.68
0.13
0.20
0.31
0.65
'Move -up time, m
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
Service Time
5.1
4.8
5.2
4.8
5.9
5.5
5.2
4.6
Worksheet
5 - Capacity and
Level
of Service
'
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L1
L2
L1
L2
Ll
L2
Ll
L2
Flow Rate
94
340
41
346
58
93
150
338
Service Time
5.1
4.8
5.2
4.8
5.9
5.5
5.2
4.6
Utilization, x
0.19
0.67
0.09
0.68
0.13
0.20
0.31
0.65
headway, hd
7.44
7.07
7.50
7.11
8.17
7.79
7.51
6.94
'Dep.
Capacity
344
497
291
494
308
343
400
505
Delay
11.93
22.84
10.90
23.79
12.11
12.44
13.59
21.66
LOS
B
C
B
C
B
B
B
C
Approach:
Delay
20.47
22.42
12.31
19.18
LOS
C
C
B
C
' Intersection Delay
19.71
Intersection
LOS C
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS ,
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/29 02
Analysis Time Period: am
Intersection: Kechter/Ziegler
Jurisdiction: Larimer County '
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: OS)
or bkgrd total
Project ID: '
East/West Street: Kechter Road
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I '
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
Volume 180 205 85 135 200 95 150 55 25 1140 120 195 1 ,
% Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
Configuration
L
TR
L
TR
L
TR
L
TR
PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.93
0.93
Flow Rate
94
340
41
346
58
93
150
338
8 Heavy Veh
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
No. Lanes
2.
2
2
2
Opposing -Lanes
2
2
2
2
Conflicting -lanes
2
2
2
2
Geometry group
5
5
5
5
Duration, T 0.25
hrs.
Worksheet
3
- Saturation
Headway
Adjustment
Worksheet
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
Flow Rates:
Total in Lane
94
340
41
346
58
93
150
338
Left -Turn
94
0
41
0
58
0
150
0
Right -Turn
0
99
0
ill
0
29
0
209
Prop. Left -Turns
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
Prop. Right -Turns
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.6
Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Geometry Group
5
5
5
5
Adjustments Table
10-40:
hLT-adj
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
hRT-adj
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
hHV-adj
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
hadj, computed
0.2
-0.1
0.2
-0.2
0.2
-0.2
0.2
-0.3
Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L1 L2
L1 L2
L1 L2
L1 L2
Flow rate 94 340
41 346
58 93
150 338
hd, initial value 3.20 3.20
3.20 3.20
3.20 3.20
3.20 3.20
32
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS '
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ,
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period. pm
Intersection:. echter/Ziegler
Jurisdiction: Larimer County '
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: hort bkgrd otal
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Kechter Road ,
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I ,
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
Volume 1315 175 45 120 180 160 180 165 30 175 55 115 1 ,
% Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
Configuration
L
TR
L
TR
L
TR
L
TR
PHF
0.90
0.90
0.92
0.92
0.87
0.87
0.89
0.89
Flow Rate
350
244
21
368
91
223
84
190
8 Heavy Veh
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
No. Lanes
2
2
2
2
Opposing -Lanes
2
2
2
2
Conflicting -lanes
2
2
2
2
Geometry group
5
5
5
5
Duration, T 0.25
hrs.
Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Eastbound
L1 L2
Flow Rates:
Total in Lane 350 244
Left -Turn 350 0
Right -Turn 0 50
Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0
Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.2
Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0
Geometry Group 5
Adjustments Table 10-40:
hLT-adj 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7
hadj, computed 0.2 -0.1
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L1
L2
L1
L2
Ll
L2
21
368
91
223
84
190
21
0
91
0
84
0
0
173
0
34
0
129
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
5
5
0.2
0.2
0.2
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
0.2
-0.2
0.2
-0.1
0.2
-0.4
Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time
Eastbound
L1 L2
Flow rate 350 244
hd, initial value 3.20 3.20
Westbound
Northbound
L1 L2
L1 L2
21 368
91 223
3.20 3.20
3.20 3.20
Southbound
L1 L2
84 190
3.20 3.20
3()
APPENDIX F
Z�
HCS2000:,Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: am m
Intersection: Zie ger/Shallow Pond
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Shallow Pond Drive
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
65
1
au
izu
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.93 0.93
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
76
1
86
129
Percent Heavy Vehicles
--
--
2
-- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1 0
0 1
Configuration
TR
LT
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement 7
8
9
I 10
11 12
L
T
R
I L
T R
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade M
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
1
45
0.86
0.86
1
52
2
2
0 0
No
0 0
LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
Lane Config LT I LR I
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
86
53
1522
973
0.06
0.05
0.18
0.17
7.5
8.9
A
A
8.9
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
21�
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
'Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: (WPM
Intersection: Zielger/Shallow Pond
'Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent(Er bkgr total
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Shallow Pond Drive
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
165 1
0.85 0.85
25
0.90
80
0.90
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
'Percent Heavy Vehicles
194 1
-- --
27
2
88
-- --
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1 0
0
1
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
TR
No
LT
No
' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Volume
1
70
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
1
82
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
Percent Grade M
0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
No
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0
0
Configuration
LR
1 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
' Lane Config LT I LR I
v tvpn)
'C(m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
1378
844
0.02
0.10
0.06
0.33
7.7
9.7
A
A
9.7
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
' Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2I
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date: 6/24/02
Period: am m
Project ID. 236
E/W St: Ketcher Road
Inter.: Ketcher/Ziegler
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: er C my
Year short grd total
NIS St: Zielger Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1
LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
Volume 180 205 65 135 200 95 140 50 25 1140 110 195 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A A P I NB Left A A
Thru A P 1 Thru A
Right A P 1 Right A
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A P I SB Left A A
Thru P 1 Thru A
Right P 1 Right A
Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right A 1 EB Right A
SB Right A A 1 WB Right A
Green 6.0 4.0 42.0 6.0 32.0
Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 587
1770
0.16
T 857
1863
0.28
R 902
1583
0.08
Westbound
L 628
1770
0.07
T 782
1863
0.30
R 839
1583
0.13
Northbound
L 481
1770
0.10
T 596
1863
0.10
R 681
-1583
0.04
Southbound
L 498
1770
0.30
T 596
1863
0.20
R 744
1583
0.28
Intersection Delay
= 17.6
0.53
0.46
0.57
0.50
0.42
0.53
0.39
0.32
0.43
12.2 B
16.9 B 14.5 B
9.8 A
12.8 B
20.2 C
12.0 B
19.3 B
23.9 C
16.6 B
17.1 B
20.8 C
0.39 20.8 C
0.32 24.8 C 19.9 B
0.47 16.4 B
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
2 �°
'Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date: 6/24/02
Period: a pm
Project ID: 0236
E/W St: Ketcher Road
Inter.: Ketcher/Ziegler
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Larimer ounty
Year or
kgrd total
N/S St: Zielger Road
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
' I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R L T R
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
Volume 1315 175 40 120 180 160 160 155 30 175 50 115 I
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A A P I NB Left A A
Thru A P I Thru A
Right A P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
' WB Left A P I SB Left A A
Thru P I Thru A
Right P I Right A
Peds X I Peds X
' NB Right A I EB Right A
SB Right A A 1,WB Right A
Green 6:0 4.0 42.0 6.0 32.0
Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0
All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0
Cycle Length: 100.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 619
1770
0.57
0.53
15.3
B
T 857
1863
0.23
0.46
16.4
B
15.3
B
R 902
1583
0.05
0.57
9.5
A
Westbound
L 662
1770
0.03
0.50
12.7
B
T 782
1863
0.25
0.42
19.6
B
16.1
B
R 839
1583
0.21
0.53
12.5
B
'Northbound
L 499
1770
0.14
0.39
19.6
B
T 596
1863
0.30
0.32
25.8
C
23.2
C
R 681
1583
0.05
0.43
16.6
B
Southbound
L 436
1770
0.19
0.39
20.0+
C
T 596
1863
0.09
0.32
23.9
C
18.6
B
R 744
1583
0.17
0.47
15.4
B
'
Intersection Delay
= 17.5
(sec/veh) Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone:
' E-Mail:
(970) 669-2061
mdelich@frii.com
Fax:
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
(970) 669-5034
i
Z- D
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: am 0
Intersection: Ketcher/Ziegler
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: hor bkgr total
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Ketcher Road
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Volumes and Adjustment
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
Volume 180 205 65 135 200 95 140 50 25 1140 110 195 1
PHF 10.85 0.85 0.85 10.85 0.85 0.85 10.85 0.85 0.85 10.93 0.93 0.93 1
Flow Rate 194 241 76 141 235 111 147 58 29 1150 118 209 1
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Approach Flow Rate 411 387 134 477
Conflicting Circulating Flow
309 199 485 323
Critical Gap and Follow-up Time
Critical Gap (sec):
Upper bound
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
Lower bound
4.60
4.60
4.60
4.60
Follow-up Time (sec):
Upper bound
2.60
2.60
2.60
2.60
Lower bound
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
Results:
Capacity and
v/c Ratio
Capacity (Eq. 10-124):
Upper bound
1086
1185
944
1074
Lower bound
891
979
764
880
v/c Ratio:
Upper bound
0.38
0.33
0.14
0.44
Lower bound
0.46
0.40
0.18
0.54
2¢
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Reiease 4.1b
'Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
Fax: (970) 669-5034
ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS
Analyst:
Michael
Agency/Co.:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed:
6/24/02
Analysis Time Period:
am pm
Intersection:
etcher/Ziegler
Jurisdiction:
Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year:
OgXb�kgr total
Project ID: 0236
tEast/West Street:
Ketcher Road
North/South Street:
Ziegler Road
Volumes and Adjustment
I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L
T R
I L
T R
I L
T
R
I L T
I
R
i
i
1315
I
I
180 160
160
155
30
175 50
115 1
175 40
120
'Volume
PHF 10.90
0.90 0.90
10.92
0.92 0.92
10.87
0.87
0.87
10.89 0.89
0.89 1
Flow Rate 1350
194 44
121
195 173
168
178
34
184 56
129 1
' Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Approach Flow Rate
588
389
280
269
Conflicting Circulating
Flow
161
596
628
284
Critical
Gap and Follow-up
Time
' Critical Gap (sec):
Upper bound
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
Lower bound
4.60
4.60
4.60
4.60
' Follow-up Time (sec):
Upper bound
2.60
2.60
2.60
2.60
Lower bound
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
Results:
Capacity and v/c Ratio
Capacity (Eq. 10-124):
Upper bound
1220
864
842
1108
Lower bound
1012
693
673
910
v/c Ratio:
Upper bound
0.48
0.45
0.33
0.24
Lower bound
0.58
0.56
0.42
0.30
.Z ?j
hd, final value
7.30
6.96
7.33
6.93
8.02
7.62
x, final value
0.19
0.61
0.08
0.67
0.10
0.18
Move -up time, m
2.3
2.3
2.3
Service Time
5.0
4.7
5.0
4.6
5.7
5.3
Worksheet
5 - Capacity and
Level
of Service_
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
Flow Rate
94
317
41
346
47
87
Service Time
5.0
4.7
5.0
4.6
5.7
5.3
Utilization, x
0.19
0.61
0.08
0.67
0.10
0.18
Dep. headway, hd
7.30
6.96
7.33
6.93
8.02
7.62
Capacity
344
504
291
507
297
337
Delay
11.72
20.05
10.69
22.41
11.66
12.04
LOS
B
C
B
C
B
B
Approach:
Delay
18.15
21.17
11.91
LOS
C
C
B
Intersection Delay
18.23
Intersection
LOS C
7.36 6.78
0.31 0.62
2.3
5.1 4.5
Southbound
L1 L2
150 327
5.1 4.5
0.31 0.62
7.36 6.78
400 516
13.28 19.71
B C
17.69
C
0
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
'Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
' Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
Fax: (970) 669-5034
' ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: Kec er/Ziegler
'Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short bkgrd otal
roject ID: 0236
East/West Street: Kechter Road
orth/South Street: Ziegler Road
Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
' I Eastbound
I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L
T R
I L
T R I L
T
R I L
I
T
R
I
I
Volume 180 205
I
1
195, 1
65
135
200 95 140
50
25 1140
110
% Thrus Left Lane
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
'
L1
L2
L1 L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
Configuration
L
TR
L TR
L
TR
L
TR
PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85 0.85
0.85
0.85
0.93
0.93
Flow Rate
94
317
41 346
47
87
150
327
8 Heavy Veh
2
2
2 2
2
2
2
2
No. Lanes
2
2
2
2
-Lanes
2
2
2
2
'Opposing
Conflicting -lanes
2
2
2
2
Geometry group
5
5
5
5
Duration, T 0.25
hrs.
Worksheet
3 -
Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L1
L2
L1 L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
Flow Rates:
Total in Lane
94
317
41 346
47
87
150
327
Left -Turn
94
0
41 0
47
0
150
0
Right -Turn
0
76
0 ill
0
29
0
209
Prop. Left -Turns
1.0
0.0
1.0 0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
Right -Turns
0.0
0.2
0.0 0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.6
'Prop.
Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Geometry Group
5
5
5
5
Adjustments Table
10-40:
hLT-adj
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
hRT-adj
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
hHV-adj
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
hadj, computed
0.2
-0.1
0.2 -0.2
0.2
-0.2
0.2
-0.3
' Worksheet
4 - Departure Headway
and Service
Time
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L2
L1 L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
'L1
Flow rate
94
317
41 346
47
87
150
327
hd, initial value
3.20
3.20
3.20 3.20
3.20
3.20
3.20
3.20
'
21
hd, final value
7.35
7.04
7.61
7.13
8.06
7.76
x, final value
0.71
0.47
0.04
0.73
0.15
0.46
Move -up time, m
2.3
2.3
2.3
Service Time
5.1
4.7
5.3
4.8
5.8
5.5
Worksheet
5 - Capacity and Level
of Service_
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
Flow Rate
350
238
21
368
68
212
Service Time
5.1
4.7
5.3
4.8
5.8
5.5
Utilization, x
0.71
0.47
0.04
0.73
0.15
0.46
Dep. headway, hd
7.35
7.04
7.61
7.13
8.06
7.76
Capacity
482
488
271
495
318
442
Delay
26.39
15.72
10.66 26.65
12.20
16.84
LOS
D
C
B
D
B
C
Approach:
Delay
22.07
25.78
15.71
LOS
C
D
C
Intersection Delay
20.46
Intersection
LOS C
8.11 7.50
0.19 0.39
2.3
5.8 5.2
Southbound
L1 L2
84 185
5.8 5.2
0.19 0.39
8.11 7.50
334 435
12.70 14.81
B B
14.15
B
2J
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
' Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
' Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com
Fax: (970) 669-5034
' ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: a `pm
Intersection: echter/Ziegler
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short bkgrd total
Project ID: 0236
'East/West Street: Kechter Road
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
' I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
I I I I
'Volume 1315 175 40 120 180 160 160 155 30 175 5
% Thrus Left Lane
11
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
'
L1
L2
L1 L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
Configuration
L
TR
L TR
L
TR
L
TR
PHF
0.90
0.90
0.92 0.92
0.87
0.87
0.89
0.89
Flow Rate
350
238
21 368
68
212
84
185
% Heavy Veh
2
2
2 2
2
2
2
2
No, Lanes
2
2
2
2
'Opposing -Lanes
2
2
2
2
Conflicting -lanes
2
2
2
2
Geometry group
5
5
5
5
Duration, T 0.25
hrs.
'
Worksheet 3 -
Saturation
Headway Adjustment
Worksheet
' Eastbound
L1 L2
Flow Rates:
' Total in Lane 350 238
Left -Turn 350 0
Right -Turn 0 44
Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0
'Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 0.2
Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0
Geometry Group 5
Adjustments Table 10-40:
hLT-adj 0.2
hRT-adj -0.6
hHV-adj 1.7
hadj, computed 0.2 -0.1
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
21
368
68
212
84
185
21
0
68
0
84
0 .
0
173
0
34
0
129
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
5
5
0.2
0.2
0.2
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
0.2
-0.2
0.2
-0.1
0.2
-0.4
' Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time
Eastbound
L1 L2
Flow rate 350 238
hd, initial value 3.20 3.20
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L1 L2
L1 L2
L1 L2
21 368
68 212
84 185
3.20 3.20
3.20 3.20
3.20 3.20
)q
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: Ketcher/Zielger
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd total
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Ketcher Road
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound westbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
80
205
65
35
200
95
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
94
241
76
41
235
ill
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
--
--
2
--
--
Median Type
Undivided
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1
1 1
1
1 1
Configuration
L
T R
L
T R
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Volume
40
50
25
140
110
195
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.93
0.93
0.93
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
47
58
29
150
118
209
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
2
2
2
2
Percent Grade M
0
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No No
Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1
Configuration L T. R L T R
Delay,
Approach EB
Movement 1
Lane Config L
Queue Length, and Level of Service
WB Northbound Southbound
4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L I L T R I L T R
v (vph)
94
41
47
58
29
150
118
209
C(m) (vph)
1213
1243
107
263
798
214
276
804
v/c
0.08
0.03
0.44
0.22
0.04
0.70
0.43
0.26
95% queue length
0.25
0.10
1.88
0.82
0.11
4.50
2.03
1.04
Control Delay
8.2
8.0
62.7
22.5
9.7
53.7
27.4
11.0
LOS
A
A
F
C
A
F
D
B
Approach Delay
33.8
28.5
Approach LOS
D
D
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
I
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
'Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 24/02
Analysis Time Period:(aig pm
Intersection: etcher/Zielger
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd total
Project ID: 0236
'East/West Street: Ketcher Road
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
■ Major Street: Approach
Eastbound
Westbound
Movement
1
2
3
1 4
5
6
L
T
R
I L
T
R
'
Volume
315
175
40
20
180
160
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.92
0.92
0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
350
194
44
21
195
173
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
--
--
2
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
No
No
Lanes
1
1 1
1
1 1
Configuration
L
T R
L
T R
Upstream Signal?
No
No
' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
60
155
30
75
50
115
'Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
0.87
0.87
0.87
0.89
0.89
0.89
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
68
178
34
84
56
129
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
2
2
2
2
Percent Grade M
0
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No No
Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1
Configuration L T R L T R
Approach
'Movement
Lane Config
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
EB WB Northbound Southbound
1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
L L I L T R I L T R
v (vph)
350
21
68
178
34 84
56
129
(vph)
1191
1329
60
ill
847 0
133
846
'C(m)
v/c
0.29
0.02
1.13
1.60
0.04
0.42
0.15
95% queue length
1.23
0.05
5.57
13.37
0.13
1.83
0.54
Control Delay
9.3
7.8
272.5
377.8
9.4
50.5
10.0+
LOS
A
A
F
F
A F
F
B
Approach Delay
307.5
Approach LOS
F
'HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
1 0
APPENDIX E
/6
CL
600
F- v 500
53 Pkt :<
Va.
400
)
a
N8 aryl Q 300
JVPH OLu
SB /l�1'24ovA�
V�—Q-2-000
I0
VU
FIGURE 4-5. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
.��►
0OR
MORE
LANES &
2 OR
MORE
LANE
= 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
MAJOR STREET — TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH
"NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET
APPROACH WITH TWO OR Mr
RE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER
w
THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A INOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE.
2
S
G
v c
i x
SI4oR% ,C4lV6E 8ACK6eOrJAl b h1,4ePA-1V7-- A— KECNrEg?larc_, ��/
APPENDIX D
1¢
Table 4-3
Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (intersections)
-
And Usalfrom structure.plan)
Commercial
Other corridors within
corridors
intersectron.type
Moved use
Low density mixed
All other
districts
use residential
areas
Signalized
D
E`
D
D
intersections
overall
Stop sign control
NIA
F-
P.
E
(arterial/local--any
approach leg)
Stop sign control
NIA
C
C
C
(collector/local—
any approach leg)
' mitigating measures required
considered normal in an urban environment
' Page 4-22 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standard
January 2, 2001
15
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 0
Level-of-Ser-7ce
Delay
veh
A
10Bd<<15C
jAeotal
d < 25D
d < 35E
d _< 50
F
> 50
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Leve"f-Service
Average Total Delay
sec/ -.,eh
A
_< 10
B
> 10 and _< 20
C
> 20 and _< 35
D
> 35 and < 55
E
> 55 and _< 80
F
> 80
IZ
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
'Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24 02
Analysis Time Period: a p
Intersection: Zie ger/Shallow Pond
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total
Project ID: 0236
'East/West Street: Shallow Pond Drive
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
■ Major Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
2
3
1 4
5
6
L
T
R
I L
T
R
'
Volume
71
0
26
69
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.93 0.93
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
83
0-
27
74
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
-_
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1 0
0 1
Configuration
TR
LT
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement
7
8
9
I 10
11
12
L
T
R
I L
T
R
Volume
0
14
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.86
0.86
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
0
16
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
Percent Grade M
0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
No
Storage
'RT Channelized?
Lanes
0
0
Configuration
LR
Delay,
Approach NB
'Movement 1
Lane Config
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
'LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Queue Length, and Level of Service
SB Westbound Eastbound
4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
LT I LR I
27
16
1514
976
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.05
7.4
8.7
A
A
8.7
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: �am pm
Intersection: �elger/Shallow Pond
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Shallow Pond Drive
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
72
0
8
/9
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.90 0.90
Hourly. Flow Rate, HFR
84
0
8
87
Percent Heavy Vehicles
--
--
2--
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1 0
0 1
Configuration
TR
LT
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement 7
8
9
1 10
11 12
L
T
R
I L
T R
Volume
V
LL
Peak Hour Factor,
PHF
0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate,
HFR
0
25
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
Percent Grade M
0 0
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Exists?
No
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
0
0
Configuration
LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12
Lane Config LT I LR I
v (vph)
8
z5
C(m) (vph)
1513
975
v/c
0.01
0.03
95% queue length
0.02
0.08
Control Delay
7.4
8.8
LOS
A
A
Approach Delay
8.8
Approach LOS
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
%0
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/22
Analysis Time Period: amtpm
Intersection: Ketc er/Zielger
'Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: e`cen short bkgrd total
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Ketcher Road
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: EW
Study
period
(hrs):
0.25
Vehicle Volumes and
Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound
Westbound
Movement 1
2
3 1
4
5
6
L
T
R I
L
T
R
Volume 30
47
25
8
61
31
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35
55
29
9
71
36
'Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
--
--
2
--
'-
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1
1 0
1
1 0
Configuration L
TR
L
TR
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach Northbound
Southbound
Movement 7
8
9
10
11
12
L
T
R I
L
T
R
31
31
16
35
54
148
'Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.93
0.93
0.93
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
36
36
18
37
58
159
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
2
2
2
2
2
Percent Grade M
0
0
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
No
No
Storage
'RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
1 1 0 1 1 0
L TR L TR
Delay,
Queue Length, and Level
of
Service
Approach
EB
WB
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4 1
7 8
9
1 10 11
12
Lane Config
L
L I
L
TR
I L
TR
v (vph)
35
9
36
54
37
217
C(m) (vph)
1484
1513
455
710
623
845
v/c
0.02
0.01
0.08
O.OB
0.06
0.26
95% queue length
0.07
0.02
0.26
0.25
0.19
1.02
Control Delay
7.5
7.4
13.6
10.5
11.1
10.7
LOS
A
A
B
B
B
B
Approach Delay
11.7
10.8
Approach LOS
B
B
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
I
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 6/24/02
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: etcher/Zielger
Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total
Project ID: 0236
East/West Street: Ketcher Road
North/South Street: Ziegler Road
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
188
43
43
11
26
59
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.92
0.92
0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
208
47
'47
11
28
64
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
--
--
2
--
--
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1
1 0
1
1 0
Configuration
L
TR
L
TR
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
7
8
9
I 10
11
12
L
T
R
I L
T
R
Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade M
Median Storage
Flared Approach: Exists?
- Storage
22
62
6
40
30
40
0.87
0.87
0.87
0.89
0.89
0.89
25
71
6
44
33
44
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
No
as
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0
Configuration L TR L TR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach
EB
WB
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
1
4 1
7 8
9 1
10 11
12
Lane Config
L
L I
L
TR I
L
TR
v (vph)
208
11
25
77
44
77
C(m) (vph)
1503
1500
324
374
306
566
v/c
0.14
0.01
0.08
0.21
0.14
0.14
95% queue length
0.48
0.02
0.25
0.76
0.50
0.47
Control Delay
7.8
7.4
17.0
17.1
18.7
12.4
LOS
A
A
C
C
C
B
Approach Delay
17.1
14.7
Approach LOS
C
B
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
0
APPEND I X -C
rM
0
R = right turn
S = straight
i _ i,.0 a.....
MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E.
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND, CO 80538
Phone: 970 669.2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 12.4-01 Observer: Harry
Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Larimer County
Intersection: Katcher (CR36)IZiegier (CR9)
Time
Begins
Northbound: Ziegler
Southbound: Ziegler
Total
northisouth
Eastbound: Ketcher
Westbound: Ketcher
Total
easttwest
Total
All
L
S
R
Total
L
S
R
Total
L
S
R
Total
L
S
R
Total
7:00
1
12
2
15
5
6
2
13
28
28
11
5
44
0
7
8
15
59
87
7:15
5
22
2
29
8
7
9
24
53
37
12
9
58
5
4
14
23
81
134 `
7:30
10
10
2
22
11
5
15
31
53
35
14
10
59
4
7
15
26
85
138
7:45
3
20
1
24
12
7
12
31
55
49
14
11
74
2
7
15
24
98
153
8:00
5
20
1
26
10
9
3
22
48
46
9
10
65
3
7
11
21
86
134
8:15
4
12
2
18
7
9
10
26
44
58
6
12
76
2
5
18
25
101
145
8:30
5
11
5
21
16
11
10
37
58
37
2
3
42
2
8
16
26
.68
126 .
8:45
4
15
3
22
12
9
9
30
52
30
3
4
37
3
6
10
19
56
108
7:30.8:30
122
162
1 6
90
40
130
140
1 110
1 200
1188
143
143 1
274
1111
126
159
1 96
1 370
1 570'
PHF
0.87
0.89
0.9
0.92
4:00
6
10
5
21
10
7
36
53
74
7
8
8
23
1
6
2
9
32
106
4:15
11
11
5
27
5
10
15
30
57
7
4
7
18
2
11
2
15
33
90
4:30
10
6
4
20
11
12
37
60
80
11
13
6
30
1
17
9
27
57
137
4:45
7
10
7
24
9
19
29
57
81
2
12
4
18
3
11
5
19
37
118
5:00
12
8
2
22
9
10
45
64
86
10
8
8
26
2
21
13
36
62
148
5:15
2
7
3
12
6
13
37
56
68
7
28
2
12
4
18
46
114
5:30
3
12
3
18
3
20
49
72
90
10
t
26
2
13
4
19
45
135
5:45
7
9
2
18
8
11
20
39
57
8
22
2
6
3
11
33
90
4:30.5:30
131
131
116
1 78
1 35
154
11148
237
1 315
30
147
125
102
1 8
161
131
100 1
202
517
PHF 1
1 0.81 1
0.93
1
0.85
1
0.69
. APPENDIX B
s
Attachment "B"
Transportation Impact Study
Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet
Origin
Rec "
Res.=.
Inst.-
OfcBus,
. Com.
Ind. `
' Other -
ro'ect Site)S
ci
Recreation
Residential
'Institutions'
church,'civic) ,
Office/Busmess
;Commercial11
hidustnal
,' , i.
F H F
Other (specify)
s
List the pedestrian destinations within 1320' (1.5 miles for schools) of the project
boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian Level of Service for the facility/corridor
linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity,
types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and
security of the selected route(s).
e) POSS« LAKG Vt&&gGr
( G) AGE GEk /f-Ae-VGST
-r4S1AG�
Z O o Z E— G
Zdo4 9f6(4 �ckoo�-
pwg
(Segoat_
V P2cs Z oAu I-VIV,oe- Wc6K S (460(—
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
January 2, 2001
4-
-%2CeA,ae-ATr oAJ
00 C.o,Jb o
Are
`DAILY S sco _4�0�
,QM tN o. o 7 (D
OUT o.37 30
P IVI too 0. Is G 21
o u-r 6.(8 I ¢
3
Attachment "A"
Transportation Impact Study
Base Assumptions
Project Information
Project Name
KFM 41VGS- FoS9U- L4KG (ZWO.OS
Project Location
gT o F ��eC:CE� C✓oUieE OF 6/�
Type of Study
Full: k p
Intermediate: Y67 g
Study Area Boundaries
North:e�TB�
South: SKAccew poN,r.�>
East: z�rEGLG�
West: ?e&4&,e
Study Years
Short Range: Z O O G
Long Range: -26RO
Future Traffic Growth Rate
Study Intersections
1. All access drives
5.
2. K6Cfi-'rW �reGcEQ-
6.
3' t 6GL e �rav W
7.
4.
8.
Time Period for Study
AM: 7:00-9:00
1 PM: 4:00-6:00
Sat Noon: No
Trip Generation Rates
A -r -rr A c l4- C D
Trip Adjustment Factors
Passby:
A.) /4
Captive
Market: Ai
Overall Trip Distribution kr-rAcwaf
North
South
East
West
Mode Split Assumptions
4
Committed Roadway Improvements
Other Traffic Studiessrc
�,eacE Csrore s LAl2r,ug2 Couvty
�61(IeT��t DE CG. i4P►eGA> -
Areas Requiring Special Study
Date: J u N a' 14 4 ZOO e-z-
Traffic Engineer: A-r-r DIFI
r
Local Entity Engineer: �i6 �—
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
January 2, 2001
2
IV. CONCLUSIONS
' This study assessed the impacts of Fossil Lake Condos on the short
range (2006) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development.
As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded:
' - The development of Fossil Lake Condos is feasible from a traffic
engineering standpoint. At full development, Fossil Lake Condos
will generate approximately 470 daily trip ends, 36 morning peak
hour trip ends, and 43 afternoon peak hour trip ends.
Currently, the Kechter/Ziegler and Ziegler/Shallow Pond
' intersections operate acceptably with existing control and
geometry.
' - In the short range (2006) future, a signal will not likely be
warranted at the Kechter/Ziegler intersection. Signal warrant
analyses should be conducted periodically.
- in the short range (2006) background traffic future, the key
intersections will operate acceptably with all -way stop sign
control or a roundabout at the Kechter/Ziegler intersection.
' - In the short range (2006) future, given full development of Fossil
Lake Condos and an increase in background traffic, the key
intersections will operate acceptably with all -way stop sign
control or a roundabout at the Kechter/Ziegler intersection. The
short range (2006) geometry is shown in Figure 8.
- Acceptable level of service will be achieved for pedestrian,
bicycle, and transit modes based upon the measures in the multi -
modal transportation guidelines.
19
Kechter Road. The proposed pedestrian level of service will be
acceptable. The route to Preston Junior High School will be via
future sidewalks along Ziegler Road or along future sidewalks internal
to Sage Creek/Harvest Park developments. The proposed pedestrian
level of service will be acceptable. The route to the 2004 High
School will be north along future Trilby Road, crossing Kechter Road
at the Kechter/Trilby/Frantz intersection. The proposed pedestrian
level of service will be acceptable. The Pedestrian LOS worksheet is
provided in Appendix G. In addition to the Pedestrian LOS Worksheets,
Appendix G also contains school routing plans for each of the nearby
existing or future schools.
Bicycle Level of Service
Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are no
destination areas within 1320 feet of Fossil Lake Condos. The bicycle
LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix G.
Transit Level of Service
Currently, there is no transit service in the area. The Fort
Collins 2015 Transit System Map shows no future transit service within
1320 feet of Fossil Lake Condos.
18
�m--✓l,9WLrV L4J��V
iter
SHORT RANGE (2006) GEOMETRY
N
Figure 8
17
TABLE 4
Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Operation
i 0 M vj 7ijr`V "i .4
gv
Of
Kechter/Ziegler
(all -way stop)
EB
c
c
WB
D
c
NB
c
B
SB
B
c
OVERALL
c
c
Kechter/Ziegler
(roundabout)
EB
0.49/0.59
0.40/0.49
WB
0.46/0.58
0.33/0.40
NB
0.37/0.47
0.16/0.20
SB
0.25/0.31
0.46/0.56
Ziegler/Shallow Pond
(stop sign)
WB LT/RT
A
A
SB LT
A
A
16
' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7 and the future
geometrics, the key intersections operate in the short range (2006)
' total traffic future as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for
these analyses are provided in Appendix F. With all -way stop sign
control or a roundabout at the Kechter/Ziegler intersection, the key
intersections will operate acceptably. The short range (2006) geometry
is shown in Figure 8.
The Kechter/Ziegler .intersection was analyzed as a roundabout
' using both the short range (2006) background and total peak hour
traffic (Figures 5 and 7). The single -lane roundabout analysis
technique, as contained in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, was used.
' This technique does not calculate level of service or delay to the
entering traffic. Instead, it provides a volume/capacity (v/c) ratio
for each entering leg. The capacity is expressed as an upper and
' lower bound. In the case of this intersection, the v/c ratios would
indicate acceptable levels of service (C or better) for alb legs in
the morning and afternoon peak hours. Emissions analyses of other
' intersection comparisons indicate that in all cases, the roundabout
alternative will result in lower emissions. This conclusion is easily
applied to this intersection, since, in most cases, the entering
vehicles on all legs will not be stopped. Data indicates that the
' accident rate at the roundabout will be less than that at a stop sign
controlled or signalized intersection. Accidents at roundabout
intersections are typically much less severe than those at
' conventional 'intersections. The roundabout will likely require
additional right-of-way in all four quadrants of the intersection,
depending upon the ultimate design. This may have a negative impact
on the existing homes in the area of the intersection. Research
indicates that the City of Fort Collins may implement roundabout
control at the Kechter/Ziegler intersection.
Pedestrian Level of Service
Discussions were held with the Fort Collins Transportation
Planning staff regarding pedestrian and bicycle level of service
analysis.' Appendix G shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet
of Fossil Lake Condos. There will be three pedestrian destinations
within a quarter mile of Fossil Lake Condos. These are: 1) the
Fossil Lake Villages development itself; 2) Sage Creek/Harvest Park;
and 3) Hearthside (future). The 2002 Elementary School, Preston
Junior High School, and 2004 High School are within one mile of Fossil
Lake Condos. This site is in an area termed "school walking area."
The minimum level of service for "school walking area" is B for all
measured categories, except for visual interest and amenities which is
C.
The pedestrian level of service to the nearby residential
destinations is/will be acceptable as the street infrastructure is
built. The route to the 2002 Elementary School will be along streets
within Fossil Lake Villages/Swift Addition or along the south side of
15
TABLE
Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Operation
�
k-, kryi
IS 13 fv
M
J
Kechter/Ziegler
(stop sign)
NB LT
F
F
NB
F
C
NB RT
A
A
NB APPROACH
F
D
SB LT
F
F
SB T
F
D
SB RT
B
B
SB APPROACH
F
D
EB LT
A
A
WB LT
A
A
Kechter/Ziegler
(all -way stop)
EB
C
C
WB
D
C
NB
C
B
SB
B
C
OVERALL
C
C
Kechter/Ziegler
(roundabout)
EB
0.48/0.58
0.38/0.46
WB
0.45/0.56
0.33/0.40
NB
0.33/0.42
0.14/0.18
SB
0.24/0.30
0.44/0.54
Ziegler/Shallow Pond
(stop sign)
WB LT/RT
A
A
SB LT
A A
A
14
rn
LO
N �
LO
160/95
to L
I� LO r
180/200
20/35
315/80
175/205 —
45/85
O LO LO
N
0LO 0
0 CO ( 0
' -ow— AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
SHORT RANGE (2006) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
100/60
NOM
Shallow Pond
Kechter
Figure 7
13
► .......
SITE GENERATED
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
iter
46,
N
Figure 6
12
Trip Assignment
' Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are
expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the
resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 6 shows the site
' generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 7 shows the total (site
plus background) short range (2006) peak hour traffic at the key
intersections.
' Signal Warrants
As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any
location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices. Peak hour signal warrant analyses are provided
' in Appendix D. Based upon the short range (2006) background peak hour
traffic forecasts and using a peak hour warrant for speeds at/below 40
mph, a signal warrant is expected to be met at the Kechter/Ziegler
intersection during the afternoon peak hour, with the current geometry.
However, if the right turns are in a separate lane, the peak hour signal
warrant would be just over the threshold in the morning peak hour for
the south leg (northbound). With total peak hour traffic volumes, the
peak hour signal warrant would be just over the threshold in the morning
peak hour for the south leg (northbound). Stop sign analyses will be
conducted with revised geometry. In addition to this, all -way stop
' analyses will be conducted. All -way stop sign control is often used as
an interim control measure prior to signalization. Discussion with the
Fort Collins Traffic Engineer indicated that the Kechter/Ziegler
intersection is being considered for a roundabout, as well. A
roundabout analysis will also be analyzed.
Operation Analysis
Capacity analyses were performed at the Kechter/Ziegler and
Ziegler/Shallow Pond intersections. The operations analyses were
conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year 2006
condition. According to City of Fort Collins staff, the Kechter/Ziegler
' intersection will have three approach lanes on all legs in the near
future. Therefore, all future year analyses assumed this geometry for
stop sign control at this intersection. The roundabout analysis assumed
' a single lane roundabout.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5 and the future
geometrics, the key intersections operate in the short range (2006)
' background traffic future as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms
for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The Ziegler/Shallow
Pond intersection will operate acceptably. The Kechter/Ziegler
' intersection will operate unacceptably with two-way stop sign control.
With all -way stop sign control or a roundabout, this intersection will
operate acceptably.
1
11
rn
LO
0)oC)
160/95
o
U)
180/200
20/35
315/80
175/205 —�
40/65
o O LO
M
� �
70/45
NOM
---*— AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Shallow Pond
SHORT RANGE (2006) BACKGROUND
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Kechter
Figure 5
10
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
A&
N
iter
Figure 4
W
SCALE: 1"=100'
SITE PLAN
Figure 3
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Fossil Lake Condos is a proposed residential developm
east of Ziegler Road and south of Kechter Road in Fort Coll
3 shows a site plan of Fossil Lake Condos. The short ra.
(Year 2006) includes development of Fossil Lake Con(
appropriate increase in background traffic. Since 1
intermediate level transportation impact study, a long range
not required. The site plan shows a public access to
Condos. The primary access will be from Dripping Rock
connects to Shallow Pond Road within the Fossil La
development.
Trip Generation
ant, located
.ns. Figure
ige analysis
os and an
his is an
analysis is
Fossil Lake
Lane, which
;e Villages
Trip generation is important in considering the. impact of a
development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system.
Trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6`" Edition,
ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the
proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip
generation on a daily and peak hour basis.
TABLE 2
TripGeneration
`. -Cli✓ 4
{y
i5�t�i5.�—'&m
`��a`��'�.
',� � f+r5���a� `t�•rrz' r"
1n x�y 3.�
r ap"��Y� yF��-F
�yy(rc .'1�" d}� �',.c
�' �w�.`.'�? ,i .C�K � —i R
230
Townhome
80 D.U.
5.86 470
0.07 6 0.37
30
0.36
29 1 0.18 1 14
Trip Distribution
Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for
Fossil Lake Condos based upon the distribution of the existing and
future trip productions for these types of land uses. Figure 4 shows
the trip distribution used for the short range (2006) analysis future.
Background Traffic Projections
Figure 5 shows the short range (2006) background traffic
projections. Background traffic projections for the short range future
horizon were obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP and various traffic
studies for other developments in the area.
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
,y.yt C4a't KSC-LL aN `R'nZi e)yV Fla Yi'SFy}`{ NSA S'L
��Y-wv�n '*[ ty�siu �Y+Y�.•Y ��iviLyy i{
s d�. lv x L / 44 T'Zn t
xyk {r �/-0tyi i(r,�4��y'jyd��`yrz
riyyEE lf`�` A��F• {i�QA ,;
} w t. i�'�tiY'} ••� V /f� �( % a T-sit��`'
x 5� t Sk%k ;Y�1�IL.Y� 1yJV� aia'•
.ifx i.J y fps
.k.`e2fL #Y '1vSty.SMF �' 1
tayr y
Y4 1?i .. ... 4F
Kechter/Ziegler
(stop sign)
NB LT
C
B
NB T/RT
C
B
NB APPROACH
C
B
SB LT
C
B
SB T/RT
B
B
SB APPROACH
B
B
EB LT
A
A
WB LT
A
A
Ziegler/Shallow Pond
(stop sign)
WB LT/RT
A
A
SB LT
A
A
m
N
a
OD
0 0 Nr to
59/31
0
`f) `r
--m26/61
11 /8 (S/0)
188/30
43/47 -►
(21/1) 43/25
r m
N N (D
N N
N
Q
N
Cr) 00
-90— AM/PM (construction traffic)
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
22/14 (4/7)
0/0
Shallow Pond
o
0
ti
a
N
Kechter
4
N
Figure 2
5
Existing Traffic
Recent peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. The
counts at the Kechter/Ziegler intersection were obtained in December
2001. Raw count data is provided in Appendix B. Since there are a
small number of existing dwelling units in the area, the counts at the
Ziegler/Shallow Pond intersection were created based upon a trip
generation analysis of the number of existing dwelling units in the area
and counts taken at the Ziegler/Rookery intersection in February 2002.
Existing Operation
The Kechter/Ziegler and Ziegler/Shallow Pond intersections were
evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual.
Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 2, the peak hour operation
is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. A
description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized
intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing
the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also
provided in Appendix C. The key intersections operate acceptably during
both the morning and afternoon peak hours.
Pedestrian Facilities
Sidewalks exist along the east side of Ziegler Road adjacent to
the Fossil Lake Villages development, .as well as, along all streets
within the Fossil Lake Villages development. On Ziegler Road, north
of Kechter Road, there are sidewalks on the west side of the street
for approximately 0.25 miles. There are also sidewalks for
approximately 0.5 miles along the north side of Kechter Road, west of
Ziegler Road. It is expected that as properties in this area are
developed, sidewalks will be installed as part of the street
infrastructure.
Bicycle Facilities
There are bicycle lanes along Kechter Road, west of Ziegler Road,
for approximately 0.5 miles, and east of Ziegler Road, for
approximately 500 feet. On Ziegler Road, bicycle lanes exist both
north and south of Kechter Road. Local streets are not required to
have designated bicycle lanes. When Kechter Road is improved to its
two-lane arterial cross section, it will have the required 8 foot bike
lanes on both sides of the street.
Transit Facilities
' site.
There are no existing transit routes within 1320 feet of this
9
N
•' j q V
_ LL
/
(V V LL
t ° l
i
HARMONY ROAD
LLI
It
Z t dj It
Z U p v
Ill r < N
a to o o� F
a --- K a
U)
LU w z A
N U Z
KECHTER R R 6
` T.
l
J
WIT,
rnnEa jjj � �'
Fossil
Lake r
y U1
k � i
Condos ry{rQ
x
RILE Y ROAD (CR34)
FOSS[ RESE" CREEK
RESERVOIR i
COUNTY ROAD 32 t � KE
tauo
e
q.E
le ;
COUNTY ROAD 30 t
p:a4n4u4:
SITE LOCATION
1
SCALE: 1 "=3000'
3
Figure 1
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The location of Fossil Lake Condos is shown in Figure 1. It is
important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be
presented.
Land Use
Land uses in the area are primarily residential and institutional.
The proposed Fossil Lake Condos site is adjacent to the Fossil Lake
Villages development. Fossil Creek Reservoir is south of the site. The
proposed 2004 High School is north of the site, across Kechter Road.
The proposed 2002 (Staley) Elementary School is located to the northeast
of Fossil Lake Condos.
Streets
The primary streets near the Fossil Lake Condos site are Ziegler
Road (CR9) and Kechter Road (CR36). Other streets in the area are local
streets within Fossil Lake Villages. Ziegler Road is west of the Fossil
Lake Condos site. It is a north -south street classified as a two-lane
arterial north of Kechter Road and classified as a collector south of
Kechter Road on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. South of the
Trilby Road intersection, Ziegler Road is classified as a local street.
Currently, Ziegler Road has a two-lane cross section. At the Kechter/
Ziegler intersection, Ziegler Road has northbound and southbound left -
turn lanes, and northbound and southbound combined through/right-turn
lanes. The Kechter/Ziegler intersection has stop sign control on
Ziegler Road. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph.
Kechter Road is to the -north of the proposed Fossil Lake Condos.
It is an east -west street classified as a two-lane arterial on the Fort
Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Kechter Road has a two-lane
cross section. At the Kechter/Ziegler intersection, Kechter Road has
eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes, and eastbound and westbound
combined through/right-turn lanes. The existing speed limit in this
area is 40 mph.
The Fort Collins Master Street Plan indicates that Trilby Road
will extend from Timberline Road to Ziegler Road, connecting to Trilby
Road through Fossil Lake Villages. The portion of Trilby Road, through
Fossil Lake Villages will be completed between Ziegler Road and Kechter
Road in the near future. However, the timing of the segment between
Timberline Road and Ziegler Road is not known. Therefore, for analysis
purposes, it was assumed that it would not exist in the short range
' future. North of Kechter Road, Trilby Road will connect to Frantz
Drive. The timing of the segment of Frantz Drive, between Rock Creek
Drive and Harmony Road is not known.
2
I. INTRODUCTION
This transportation impact study addresses the capacity,
geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Fossil Lake
Condos residential development. Fossil Lake Condos is located east of
Ziegler Road (CR9) and south of Kechter Road (CR36) in Larimer County,
Colorado. Fossil Lake Condos is adjacent to a development known as
Fossil Lake Villages.
During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made
with the project planning consultant (Aller Lingle), the project
engineer (North Star Design), the developer (KEM Homes), the Fort
' Collins Traffic Engineer, and the Fort Collins Transportation Planning
staff. The Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions form and
related documents are provided in Appendix A. Fossil Lake Condos is
' within the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area. Therefore, this study
generally conforms to the format set forth in the Larimer County Urban
Area Street Standards. Due to the trip generation, this is an
intermediate level transportation impact study. The study involved the
following steps:
- Collect physical, traffic, and development data;
' - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment;
Determine peak hour traffic volumes;
- Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key
' intersections; -
Analyze signal warrants;
- Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and
' transit modes of transportation.
1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Page
1.
Site Location ........................................
3
2.
Recent Peak Hour Traffic .............................
5
3.
Site Plan ............................................
8
4.
Trip Distribution ....................................
9
5.
Short Range (2006) Background Peak
Hour Traffic ......
10
6.
Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic .....................
12
7.
Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour
Traffic ...........
13
8.
Short Range (2006) Geometry ..........................
17
APPENDIX
A Base Assumptions Form
B Recent Peak Hour Traffic
C Existing Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort
Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards
D Peak Hour Signal Warrant Analysis
E Short Range Background Peak Hour Operation
F Short Range Total Peak Hour Operation
G Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service Worksheets
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I.
Introduction .........................................
1
II.
Existing Conditions ..................................
2
LandUse .............................................
2
Streets..............................................
2
Existing Traffic .....................................
4
Existing Operation ...................................
4
Pedestrian Facilities ................................
4
Bicycle Facilities ...................................
4
Transit Facilities ...................................
4
III.
Proposed Development .................................
7
TripGeneration ......................................
7
Trip Distribution ....................................
7
Background Traffic Projections
.......................
7
TripAssignment ......................................
11
Signal Warrants ......................................
11
Operation Analysis ...................................
11
Pedestrian Level of Service ..........................
15
Bicycle Level of Service .............................
18
Transit Level of Service .............................
18
IV.
Conclusions ..........................................
19
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Page
1.
Current Peak Hour
Operation ..........................
6
2.
Trip Generation...........I
...........................
7
3.
Short Range (2006)
Background
Peak Hour Operation .... 14
4.
Short Range (2006)
Total Peak
Hour Operation ......... 16
FOSSIL LAKE CONDOS
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
JULY 2002
Prepared for:
KEM Homes
3000 South College Avenue, Suite 103
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Prepared by:
MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: 970-669-2061
FAX: 970-669-5034
PP�p RE2z
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b
Matthew J. Delich
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
' Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
' E-Mail: mdelichlfrii.com
Fax
ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS
Analyst:
Michael
'Agency/Co.:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed:
6/24/02
Analysis Time Period:
am
Intersection:
Ket er/Ziegler
Jurisdiction:
Larimer County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year:
short bkgrd total
ID: 0236
'Project
East/West Street:
Ketcher Road
North/South Street:
Ziegler Road
Volumes and Adjustment
(970) 669-5034
' I Eastbound
I Westbound
I Northbound
I Southbound I
I L T R
I L T R
I L T
R
I L T
I
R I
I
I
Volume 180 205 85
I
I
150 55
25
1140 120
195 1
135 200 95
PHF 10.85 0.85 0.85
10.85 0.85 0.85
10.85 0.85
0.85
10.93 0.93
0.93 1
Flow Rate 194 241 99
141 235 111
158 64
29
1150 129
209 1
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
Approach
Flow Rate
434
387
151
488
Conflicting Circulating Flow
320
216
485
334
Critical
Gap and Follow-up
Time
Critical
Gap (sec):
Upper
bound
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
Lower
bound
4.60
4.60
4.60
4.60
' Follow-up Time (sec):
Upper
bound
2.60
2.60
2.60
2.60
Lower
bound
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
Results:
Capacity and v/c Ratio
Capacity
(Eq. 10-124):
Upper
bound
1077
1169
944
1065
Lower
bound
882
965
764
872
v/c Ratio:
Upper
bound
0.40
0.33
0.16
0.46
Lower
bound
0.49
0.40
0.20
0.56
7 c2
x, iniLidl
U..D1
V.LL
V.VL
V.1J
v. v
hd, final value
7.51
7.19
7.77
7.29
8.14
7.85
final value
0.73
0.49
0.05
0.75
0.21
0.49
'x,
Move -up time, m
2.3
2.3
2.3
Service Time
5.2
4.9
5.5
5.0
5.8
5.5
Worksheet
5 - Capacity and
Level
of Service_
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
Flow Rate
350
244
21
368
91
223
Service Time
5.2
4.9
5.5
5.0
5.8
5.5
Utilization, x
0.73
0.49
0.05
0.75
0.21
0.49
'Dep. headway, hd
7.51
7.19
7.77
7.29
8.14
7.85
Capacity
473
491
271
485
341
440
Delay
27.93
16.52
10.84
28.37
12.93
17.74
LOS
D
C
B
D
B
C
' Approach:
Delay
23.25
27.43
16.35
LOS
C
D
C
Intersection Delay
21.40
Intersection LOS
C
8.25 7.64
0.19 0.40
2.3
5.9 5.3
Southbound
L1 L2
84 190
5.9 5.3
0.19 0.40
8.25 7.64
334 440
12.90 15.41
B C
14.64
B
S�
•q
APPENDIX A