Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOSSIL LAKE ANNEXATION NO. 1 - 33-01 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)From: Peter Barnes To: Troy Jones Date: Thu, Apr 26, 2001 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Stanton Creek Since we'll be issuing permits for lots in those developments, we'll definitely need copies of the mylars for our files. It would be nice to write a note on the mylars stating that these were approved in the County and are not subject to garage standards of the LUC. >>> Troy Jones 04/26 3:19 PM >>> Do you have any preference how we should do it for Westchase and Fossil Lake PUD that are both approved in the county under IGA standards? Once they are annexed (probably in a few months from now) I can ensure that we get mylar copy of the approved plans for our vault. Let me know if you have any preferences. Troy >>> Peter Barnes 04/26 7:56 AM >>> The only simple way is that we know what process a development was approved under. For example, we know that Waterglen is LDGS, therefore no garage standards. That's about the only way. As far as Stanton Creek goes, both the 1st and 2nd filings are allowed to follow the original LUC garage standards, meaning that 1/3 of the lots can be protruding. The recorded site plan shows which lots can be protruding, so we check that with each application. >>> Troy Jones 04/25 4:42 PM >>> Peter, When someone comes in for a building permit for a single family residence in Stanton Creek, how does the building inspection department check for compliance with the garage door standard? It's my understanding that not all lots within Stanton Creek have to meet the standard. Do you (or building inspection) pull out the approved site plan to check for compliance every time a building permit is reviewed? Or for that matter, how do you track LDGS lots versus LUC lots with regard to the garage standards? The reason I'm asking is that Westchase and Fossil Lake PUD are both county developments about to annex, but were approved under the IGA Standards for the Fossil Creek Reservoir Area. The standards for the Fossil Creek Reservoir Area are similar to LUC standards, but different in that there is no "residential building standards" section, and therefore no garage door standards. Is there a simple way for your department to keep track of the fact that the lots in these subdivisions don't need to meet the garage standards? Troy