HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIDAL WAVE CARWASH - PDP - 38-01 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - DRAINAGE REPORTIM wm �
PROJECT SITE 11
c,
cr
D G
>
a
d,pgy,
d
rAuaa
�
a
rT
riiF
c 'ScT
4�
i
py
aaia.r n /� cW'`+ir cr
I
�
3
d $
�� w gWS1W i 33
oa, nes cr
MA Im[
O
[ IWtII100➢11D
FS
6
?
swq.T n
+� ulaYm � own,Imc a
W[d 'II
A[4mM
�' �
Wn
(i
Tad%
�xS!_fi3e ' 'Y� i
I
KY Yw�rw n
sarx c
S *
9�: �i`
..2� •.�rl.
z.
wnun n
[�
sonu M
�
I
[�
�w1W
�
a OaY)6IIt n
6 IIGAA•II Ci
AtlM Yr
S S
oWaux C
A. Yommco n
,. Yo.wm n
�^4
66C
Wp °xrrl
aaYgr n 41
,
I.
S�I
[r 4�t
cr S
T
6 °'Y��'T
agnrw nm
ayp
yt,
a
4
a
<�
11MA9Q S
k
\ 4S
• d
w
geea
■
�
sA'or ooK uI
■pR
� cu[ L
a
[D
c��j �
ySrQ
F
3G
d
W'�
Mk6
iO
rAMYN W
p
c-Tok
OrYM
L /1
> yplR
VIAL w
IMR �
Mr10AlR F
Ey
Y
4
Yr
cr S
4
y
d
y
Sh
s
noun
4
a,4A
aY
4
• ruxYAr uI
rI>tYAr ui
�. z
i. vlracr ora CT
x o.A YAAw cr
ux aA ct
I
1
APPENDIX A
VICINITY MAP
11
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
A
I
7. REFERENCES
1. City of Fort Collins, "Storm Drainage Criteria Manual", (SDCM), dated March, 1986.
2. The Final Drainage Report for the Market Place by Parsons & Associates dated July,
1989.
3. The Final Drainage Report for Heart Special Improvement District by Engineering
Professionals, Inc. dated January 1985.
4. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria
Manual", Volumes 1 and 2, dated March, 1969, and Volume 3 dated September,
1992.
6
I
shown on the Detail Sheet with base material consisting of 6" coarse aggregate. The
contractor will be responsible for clearing tracked mud on a daily basis.
5.5 Maintenance
All temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control practices must be maintained
and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Silt
fences will require periodic replacement. Maintenance is the responsibility of the
contractor.
1 6. CONCLUSIONS
' 6.1 Compliance with Standards
' All computations that have been completed within this report are in compliance with the
City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual.
1 6.2 Drainage Concept
The proposed drainage concepts presented in this report and on the construction plans
adequately provide for the detention and transmission of developed on -site runoff to the
' existing storm system. The impact of the development of this site on existing
downstream facilities is not substantial. Detention is being provided to meet
requirements set by the Final Drainage Report for the Market Place and the Final
tDrainage Report for Heart Special improvement District.
If, at the time of construction, groundwater is encountered, a Colorado Department of
Health Construction Dewatering Permit would be required.
6.3 Erosion Control Concept
Since the site is less than 5.0 acres, a NPDES permit is not required. During
construction, erosion control shall be maintained to minimize erosion on this site and
transport of silt downstream.
1 5
I
I
1 4.4 Variance Requests
1 No variances are being requested at this time.
1 5. EROSION CONTROL
1 5.1 General Concept
This site lies within the Moderate Rainfall and Wind Erodibility Zone per the City of Fort
Collins Zone Maps. A potential exists for silt movement from the site to be transported
into the existing ponds located to the south of the site. All erosion control measures
necessary to minimize sediment transport have been shown on the Erosion Control Plan.
1 5.2 Specific Details
' To limit the amount of silt leaving the site, several erosion control measures shall be
implemented during construction. Silt fence shall be installed along the southern and
eastern sides of proposed site. Also, vehicle -tracking pads shall be installed at the two
1 entrance the existing asphalt drive to control the mud being tracked onto the existing
pavement. During overlot grading, disturbed areas are to be kept in a roughened
' condition and watered to reduce wind erosion.
' 5.3 Dust Abatement
During the performance of the work required by these plans, the contractor shall carry out
proper efficient measures wherever and as necessary to reduce dust nuisance, and to
prevent dust nuisance, which has originated from his operations from damaging crops,
orchards, cultivated fields and dwellings, or causing nuisance to persons. The Contractor
will be held liable for any damage resulting from dust originating from his operations
under these plans, on right-of-way or elsewhere.
5.4 Tracking Mud
Wherever construction vehicles access routes intersect paved public roads, provisions
shall be made to minimize the transport of sediment (mud) by runoff or vehicles tracking
onto the paved surface. A stabilized construction entrance is required per the detail
4
I
I
3.4 Hydraulic Criteria
All hydraulic calculations within this report have been prepared in accordance with the
City of Fort Collins Drainage Criteria and are also included in Appendix B of this report.
4. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
4.1 General Concept
' The runoff from this site will flow south in the parking lot via pans and curb & gutter to
' the proposed detention pond. The flow will be detained in the proposed pond and
released at the predetermined rate discussed above.
' 4.2 Specific Flow Routing
A summary of the drainage patterns within each basin is provided in the following
paragraphs. For more specific details see the calculations located in Appendix B of this
report.
Sub -basin 1 contains the east portion of the site including the east half of the building, a
portion of the drive areas and a portion of the landscaped area. Runoff from this basin
flows to the east to the proposed curb which will convey the flow south to a curb opening.
' The flow then is conveyed by a concrete pan to the detention area.
Sub -basin 2 contains the west portion of the site including the west half of the building
and a portion of the drive areas. Runoff from Sub -basin 2 collects in a concrete pan in
the drive and is conveyed directly into the detention pond.
4.3 Drainage Summary
The storm conveyance system is a surface and sub -surface system and has been designed
for minimal maintenance. The proposed storm sewer system (outlet structure and pans)
and the detention pond will be owned and maintained by the property owners. The
existing storm system shall be maintained by the City of Fort Collins or other responsible
parties.
3
c
I
1 3. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
1 3.1 Regulations
1 This report was prepared to meet or exceed the "City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage
Design Criteria Manual' specifications. Where applicable, the criteria established in the
1 "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual' (UDFCD), 1984, developed by the Denver
Regional Council of Governments, has been used.
1 3.2 Development Criteria Reference and Constraints
1 The runoff from this site and the allowable release rate has been routed to conform to
existing drainage reports completed that have included this area.
The streets and associated drainage systems surrounding the site are existing. There is a
storm system existing on the south west comer of the site. This site is intended to
discharge into that system. Therefore, a pipe is proposed to be stubbed from the existing
manhole into the proposed detention area.
1 Detention is proposed for this site and release will be restricted to the previously
calculated rate of 0.87 cfs per acre (0.66 cfs). Runoff from the site was calculated based
on the rainfall criteria adopted by the City of Fort Collins on March 26, 1999. Water
quality measures will also be provided in the form of extended detention.
3.3 Hydrologic Criteria
Runoff computations were prepared for the 2-year minor and 100-year major storm
frequency utilizing the rational method.
i
All hydrologic calculations associated with the basins are included in Appendix B of this
1' report. Standard Form 8 (SF-8) provides time of concentration calculations for all sub -
basins. Standard Form 9 (SF-9) provides a summary of the design flows for all Sub -
basins and Design Points associated with this site.
1 2
I
1
GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
1.1 Location
This site is located in a tract of land in the Southwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 7
North, Range 69 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in the City of Fort Collins, County
of Larimer, State of Colorado. See the location map in Appendix A.
' The project is located north of Troutman Parkway and west of JFK Parkway. The site is
bounded by existing commercial development on the west and north boundaries and by
' existing streets on the south and east boundaries.
1.2 Description of Property
The entire project consists of 0.82 acres of land. The land is currently undeveloped and
slopes to the southwest at approximately 1% to 4%. The runoff from the site currently
appears to pond on site without a point of release.
' The project will consist of a single structure which will be a 6 bay car wash and
associated drives and queuing area. The site will access from an existing asphalt drive
which loops from Troutman to JFK.
2. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB -BASINS
2.1 Major Basin Description
The proposed development lies within the McClellands Mail Creek Drainage Basin. The
site is included in the area covered by the Final Drainage Report for the Market Place
and the Final Drainage Report for Heart Special Improvement District. Portions of these
reports are included in Appendix E. These reports allow for a release from this site of
0.87 cfs per acre which was calculated to be the 2-year historic runoff by the above
mentioned reports. This runoff will discharge into the No. 2 Canal south of the site.
2.2 Sub -basin Description
Sub -basins are described thoroughly in Section 4.2.
1
11
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
'TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................................m
1. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
1.1 Location...............................................................................................................................I
1.2 Description of Property ........................................................................................................1
' 2. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB -BASINS
2.1 Major Basin Description......................................................................................................1
2.2 Sub -Basin Description......................................................................................................... I
3. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
3.1 Regulations..........................................................................................................................2
3.2 Development Criteria Reference and Constraints................................................................2
3.3 Hydrologic Criteria..............................................................................................................2
3.4 Hydraulic Criteria................................................................................................................3
' 4. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
4.1 General Concept..................................................................................................................3
4.2 Specific Flow Routing.........................................................................................................3
4.3 Drainage Summary ..............................................................................................................3
4.4 Variance Requests...............................................................................................................4
' 5. EROSION CONTROL
5.1 General Concept..................................................................................................................4
5.2 Specific Details....................................................................................................................4
5.3 Dust Abatement...................................................................................................................4
5.4 Tracking Mud......................................................................................................................4
5.5 Maintenance........................................................................................................................ 5
' 6. CONCLUSIONS
6.1 Compliance with Standards................................................................................................5
6.2 Drainage Concept................................................................................................................ 5
' 6.3 Water Quality and Erosion Control Concept.......................................................................5
7. REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................6
APPENDICES
B
C
D
1
1
Vicinity Map
Hydrologic Computations
Detention and Water Quality Calculations
Figures and Tables
Excerpts from Previous Reports
iii
r
I North Star
�AOOIA*mm, design, inc.
ISeptember 4, 2001
Basil Hamdan
City of Fort Collins Stormwater
700 Wood Street
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
' RE: Final Drainage Report for Tidal Wave Car Wash
Dear Basil,
■ I am pleased to submit for your review and approval, this Final Drainage & Erosion Control
Report for Tidal Wave Car Wash. I certify that this report for the drainage design of Tidal Wave
Car Wash was prepared in accordance with the criteria in the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage
Manual.
I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this submittal. Please call if you have any
questions.
Si ely,
1
Patricia Kroetch, P.E.
North Star Design, Inc.
1
ii
700 Automation Drive, Unit I Windsor, Colorado 80550
t970-686-6939 Phone 970-686-1188 Fax
FINAL DRAINAGE AND
EROSION CONTROL REPORT
TIDAL WAVE CAR WASH
Prepared for:
Rhey Wright
5238 Fox Hills Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80526
Prepared by:
North Star Design, Inc.
700 Automation Drive, Unit I
Windsor, Colorado 80550
Ph# (970) 686-6939
Fax# (970) 686-1188
September 3, 2001
Job Number 159-01