Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UNIVERSITY CENTER P.U.D. (WARDS REDEVELOPMENT) - MINOR AMENDMENT / REPLAT - 40-01 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY
FUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worksheet Destination Approximate Distance Auto Travel Time Bus Travel Time Travel Time Factor CSU Campus Transit Center 1.8 11 16 Foothills Fashion Mall 1.4 10 16 Fort Collins High School 3.8 16 37 Downtown Fort Collins 2.3 12 20 Total Travel Time 49 89 1.8 Service Level Standards Worksheet Mixed Use Remainder of Standard Centers and the Service Meets Standard Fails Standard Commercial Area Corridors Hours of Weekday Service 18 hours 16 hours X Weekday Frequency of Service 15 minutes 20 minutes X Travel Time Factor 2.0 x 2.0 x X Peak Load Factor <_ 1.2 <_ 1.2 X 4of4=LOSA Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p.20 LOS Standards for Develupment Review - Bicycle Figure, 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service - connectivity nminnan actual proposed base connectivity: C F specific connections to priority sites: description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address comMr,,eCIAL A2eA destination area classification (see text) eoua&,erca(- [Imimimil Fvr vRe�' "'J4Sw-) �rR6Gr ( ca ge A r %'o tx=- c.e- ©.0 S'rc City of Fart Collins Transportation Master Plan Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. 18 LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: MCT1UITy `okprDOp , rI�pe!tOC(enteras many as apply) description of applicable destination area level of service (minimum based on project location classification) destination area within 1,320' classification including address aew uul (see letext)Air+anes+ :aaiuu:p oti inpresl5 ++cavity Hwang+ !II\bYf1M nwdnuun /^(z '�j actual �OV e C IV C B 13 proposed A �` NB C 3 nmitrnnn 6 P C Q actual �� /U�14 IU/.4 vf4 )IA pruposed A B Q mnt Tkun actual proposed ai nit tine mt actual ' pruposed Rou7l✓ � Coc.c-U�� A��'uu� CT2r4us rr� �Uq �o�J �rR�� `f- 'j"��uSt t �nurt City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P.18 LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: is IN IFU description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address UNfu��slTv �a�t.t. AP_ A SOUTH 01: e&S(UeNTfAL AI?G:A S4ST of (20L(- E OFFtC'(r �erywl.tEk�tAC. CoMmG2CIAc. AeaA CTiytrV (2o►ee(Do(zi /Jzowsti (�QvI s many as a pply) destination area level of service (minimum based on project location classification) classification (see text) l'.!?NHp�CfA4 ndudnnun (3 �/� actual A A A ng A �4 proposed A A A A ,Q 2�'SIDEUnAC nundrrnan 2 T [� g (A,_e,4 actual A 1C C C t3 proposed A r ®®,_©'©,®1lm �slsl�l[�1� �I©lwjml �m ��W;AI �I�l�lalsl�� '" '� City of Port Collins Transportation Master Plan SGALt: �-=luuu ' PEDESTRIAN AREA APPENDIX H L TENANTI A TENANT 2 TENANT 3 (l/Cl/ i LOT 1 4\4\ 0 u On -site Offset Intersection APPENDIX G 2 10 • . • N�NrN•��ru LENGTH OF RIGHT- OR LEFT -TURN LANE D Z 7I 1 ~ O 600 W z Q 500 J O z Z 3�0 400 Ir U -7QI O � x r, z W. 200 J N c) 10p O N SOURCE, LEI$CNI JACKS "CAPACITY ANALYSIS TEC.NNIQUES FOR DESIGN OF 5M"ALIZED INTERSCCTIONG" k �ppr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound L 294 __Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS 1365 0.75 0.215 58.1 E Approach Delay LOS TR 342 1649 0.32 0.208 44.3 D 53.5 D kestbound L 256 1232 0.08 0.208 41.6 D 383 1780 IF 0.10 0.215 41.0 D 41.2 D Northbound 99 0.80 0.700 51.0 D R 3279 5075 0.60 0.646 6.8 A 8.5 A routhbound 141 0.26 0.700 8.2 A T 3286 5085 0.78 0.646 9.4 A 9.4 A 1023 1583 0.17 0.646 9.5 A Intersection Delay = 12.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 tatthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. t272 Glen Haven Drive oveland, CO 80538 hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 -Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS tntersection: College/Rutgers City/State: Fort Collins nalyst: Michael roject No: 0075 ime Period Analyzed: short total w/adjusted pm (ate: 9/29/00 ast/West Street Name: Rutgers orth/South Street Name: College I ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 AJ� 3 5 ; C_,E' PA I 'Inter: College/Rutgers Analyst: Michael Date: 9/29/00 'E/W St: Rutgers I Eastbound L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR Volume 1210 25 80 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 ' RTOR Vol 1 0 City/St: Fort Collins Proj #: 0075 Period: short total w/adjusted pm N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound 1 Northbound ( Southbound I L T R I I L T R I I L T i R 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 1 1 L TR 1 L TR i L T R 120 25 10 175 1855 25 135 2450 170 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left A 1 NB Left Thru A 1 Thru Right A I Right Peds X I Peds Left A 1 SB Left ,WB Thru A I Thru Right A I Right Peds X I Peds 'NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 27.0 Yellow 5.0 All Red 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs 5 6 A P P X A P P P X 6.0 84.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 7 8 Intersection Performance Summary_ ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS astbound L 146 1353 1.51 0.108 321.1 F T 186 1863 0.14 0.100 53.7 D 158 1583 0.53 0.100 59.0 E estbound T 162 1500 0.29 0.108 54.4 D 158 1583 0.07 0.100 53.2 D Northbound 75 L 93 1.05 0.808 131:8 F 4060 5075 0.49 0.800 0.4 A outhbound Approach Delay LOS 233.6 F 54.2 D 5.5 A 146 181 0.25 0.808 7.2 A T 4068 5085 0.63 0.800 0.8 A 1.0 A 1266 1583 0.14 0.800 3.2 A Intersection Delay = 18.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 katthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. t272 Glen Haven Drive oveland, CO 80538 Fhone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: -Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS_ _ ,Intersection: College/Rutgers City/State: Fort Collins Michael (nalyst: roject No: 0075 ime Period Analyzed: short total w/existing pm 9/29/00 (ate: ast/West Street Name: Rutgers orth/South Street Name: College (970) 669-5034 Inter: nalyst Date: 1/W St: HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 College/Rutgers City/St: Fort Collins Michael Proj #: 0075 9/29/00 Period:rt total w/existing pm_ Rutgers N/S St: CoM ege SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound ' L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1-1-0 1 1 GConfig I L LT R I LT R I L TR ■volume 1210 25 80 120 25 10 175 1855 25 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 &ZTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ hase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A 1 NB Left Thru A I Thru Right A 1 Right Peds x 1 Peds B Left A I SB Left Thru A 1 Thru Right A I Right Peds X I Peds tB Right 1 EB Right B Right ( WB Right Green 13.0 ellow 5.0 11 Red 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 I, secs 5 P P P x P P P x 104.0 4.0 2.0 Southbound L T R I' 1 1 3 1 L T R 135 2450 170 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 6 7 Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ___ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 272 1770 0.69 0.154 59.6 E T 272 1863 0.29 0.146 50.1 D 53.4 D R 329 1583 0.29 0.208 43.9 D Westbound ' LT 168 1820 0.47 0.092 58.1 E 54.2 D R 317 1583 0.08 0.200 42.4 D Northbound 'L 125 0.67 0.623 37.4 D TR 2813 5079 0.66. 0.554 15.0 B 16.0 B 'Southbound L 148 0.32 0.623 14.1 B T 2816 5085 0.88 0.554 21.5 C 20.4 C R 1181 1583 0.12 0.746 4.6 A Intersection Delay = 21.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS __ Intersection: College/Columbia City/State: Fort Collins Analyst: Michael Project No: 0075 Time Period Analyzed: short total w/split phase pm Date: 9/29/00 East/West Street Name: Columbia North/South Street Name: College HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: nalyst : pate: E/W St: College/Columbia Michael 9/29/00 Columbia City/St: Fort Collins Proj #: 0075____. Period: 4h—ort total w/split phase pm N/S St: Co e _ _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ ( Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R T R T R T R I L I L I L � I I I I i to. Lanes ► 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 1 LGConfig ( L T R I LT R ( L TR ( L T R I tolume (180 75 90 135 40 25 180 1750 15 145 2360 135 ane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol ( 0 ► 0 1 0 I 0 I turation 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations hase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 B Left A I NB Left A P Thru A ( Thru P Right A ( Right P LPeds X X ► 'Peds X Left A 1 SB. Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P ' Right A 1 Right P Peds X X 1 Peds X NB Right ( EB Right A tB Right A ( WB Right A reen 19.0 11.0 8.0 72.0 Yellow 5.0 5.0_ 0.0 4.0 c11 Red 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 ycle Length: 130.0 secs I 1 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ,Eastbound L 234 1218 0.81 0.192 68.8 E 344 1863 0.23 0.185 45.5 D 54.6 D 'T R 475 1583 0.20 0.300 34.1 C Westbound LT 296 1541 0.27 0.192 45.2 D 42.0 D R 475 1583 0.05 0.300 32.4 C forthbound 126 0.67 0.723 26.7 C R 3321 5079 0.56 0.654 5.9 A 6.8 A Southbound L 188 0.25 0.723 6.6 A T 3325 5085 0.75 0.654 8.1 A 7.7 A R 1400 1583 0.10 0.885 1.0 A ' Intersection Delay = 11.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS _ Intersection: College/Columbia City/State: Fort Collins Analyst: Michael Project No: 0075 Time Period Analyzed: short total w/adjusted phasepm Date: 9/29/00 East/West Street Name: Columbia North/South Street Name: College HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 i4 DSSTcc Pr✓ Inter: College/Columbia Analyst: Michael Date: 9/29/00 E/W St: Columbia City/St: Fort Collins Proj #: 0075 Period: short total w/adjusted phasepm N/S St: Cisl SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY tb d 1 Northbound LasLDounu I Wes oun R L T R ► L T R I L T I No. Lanes I _ I 1 1 1 —1-0 I0 1 1 1 1 3 0 LGConfig I L T R I LT R ► L TR Volume 1180 75 90 135 40 25 180 1750 15 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 ' RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 ► 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I EB Left A I NB Left Thru A 1 Thru Right A ► Right Peds X I Peds WB Left A I SB Left ' Thru A ( Thru Right A I Right Peds X ► Peds 'NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right Green 24.0 'Yellow 5.0 All Red 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs A :1 A A 8.0 0.0 0.0 Southbound ► ► L T R I I I 1 1 3 1 1 L T R 145 2360 135 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 P P P X P P X 85.0 4.0 2.0 7 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios.. Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay L0S Eastbound L 179 1162 1.06 0.154 137.8 F 272 1863 0.29 0.146 50.1 D 91.6 F 'T R 475 1583 0.20 0.300 34.1 C Westbound LT 227 1475 0.35 0.154 50.1 D 45.7 D R 475 1583 0.05 0.300 32.4 C Northbound 'L 194 0.43 0.762 14.3 B TR 3321 5079 0.56 0.654 5.9 A 6.3 A 'Southbound L 256 0.18 0.762 5.0 A T 3325 5085 0.75 0.654 8.1 A 8.0 A R 1035 1583 0.14 0.654 8.8 A Intersection Delay = 14.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS_ Intersection: College/Columbia City/State: Fort Collins Analyst: Michael Project No: 0075 Time Period Analyzed: shrt total w/existing phase pm Date: 9/29/00 ' East/West Street Name: Columbia North/South Street Name: College HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Lnter: College/Columbia nalyst: Michael Date: 9/29/00 'E/W St: Columbia No. Lanes kGConf ig olume Lane Width 'RTOR Vol City/St: Fort Collins Proj #: 0075 Period: shrt total w/existing,phase pm N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 L. T R I L T R I L T R I 0 1 1 I 1 3 0 I 1 1 1 L T R I LT R I L TR 1180 75 90 135 40 25 180 1750 15 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 I 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ ,Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I EB Left A I NB Left Thru A I Thru ' Right A 1 Right Peds X I Peds Left A I SB Left 'WB Thru A I Thru Right A I... Right Peds X I Peds 'NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 19.0 Yellow 5.0 All Red 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs 5 6 A P P P X A P P P X Southbound L T R t I 1 3 1 L T R 145 2360 135 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 A A 13.0 85.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 7 8 APPENDIX E Intersection Performance Summary_ _ 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate __ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 183 1398 0.52 0.131 55.3 E ,TR 200 1628 0.13 0.123 51.0 D 54.4 D Westbound 160 1299 0.13 0.123 51.1 D 'L TR 217 1660 0.05 0.131 49.5 D 50.6 D Northbound 'IL 75 95 0.21 0.785 10.0+ B TR 3943 5075 0.50 0.777 0.5 A 0.5 A Southbound L 144 183 0.24 0.785 7.5 A T 3951 5085 0.65 0.777 0.8 A 1.0 A 1230 1583 0.05 0.777 3.4 A ,R Intersection Delay = 2.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Matthew J. Delich J. Delich, P.E. 'Matthew 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ,Intersection: College/Rutgers City/State: Fort Collins Michael 'Analyst: Project No: 0075 Time Period Analyzed: short bkgrd w/adjusted pm . Date: 9/29/00 'East/West Street Name: Rutgers North/South Street 1 Name: College HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ,Inter: College/Rutgers Analyst: Michael Date: 9/29/00 'E/W St: Rutgers Eastbound ► L T R I_ No. Lanes ► 1 1 0 'LGConfig ► L TR Volume 190 4 20 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 'RTOR Vol ► 0 City/St: Fort Collins Proj #: 0075 Period:lshort bkgrd w/adjusted pm N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ► Westbound ( Northbound L T R ► L T R 1 1 1 0 i 1 3 0 L TR ► L TR 119 3 8 115 1841 26 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas n Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X Left A 'WB Thru A Right A Peds X 'NB Right SB Right Green 16.0 Yellow 5.0 All Red 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 1 Signal Operations- -2--3 4 I NB Left Thru ► Right 1 Peds I SB Left Thru 1 Right 1 Peds ► EB Right 1 WB Right secs 5 P P P X P P X 101.0 4.0 2.0 Southbound L T R I ► 1 3 1 L T R 132 2434 54 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 6 7 8 II Performance Summary 'Appr/ _ Lane _Intersection Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 149 1383 0.64 0.108 64.3 E LT 186 1863 0.02 0.100 52.8 D 62.1 E R 158 1583 0.13 0.100 53.7 D Westbound I' LT 147 1361 0.16 0.108 53.1 D 53.1 D R 158 1583 0.05 0.100 53.1 D Northbound 'L 77 95 0.21 0.808 8.9 A TR 4060 5075 0.48 0.800 0.4 A 0.5 A I' ISouthbound L 148 183 0.23 0.808 6.5 A T 4068 5085. 0.63 0.800 0.7 A 0.9 A R 1266 1583 0.05 0.800 2.8 A' Intersection Delay = 2.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Matthew J. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, 2272 Glen Haven Drive P.E. Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (97.0) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: College/Rutgers City/State: Fort Collins Michael 'Analyst: Project No: 0075 Time Period Analyzed: short bkgrd w/existing pm Date: 9/29/00 East/West Street Name: Rutgers North/South Street Name: College �Bt�CK,P��1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: College/Rutgers City/St: Fort Collins 'Analyst: Michael Proj #: 0 Date: 9/29/00 Period: short bkgrd w/existing mp E/W St: Rutgers N/S St: College " SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R L T R No. Lanes I I I 1 1 1 1 —1 1 0 1 1 i 1 3 0 LGConfig I L LT R I LT R I L TR ,Volume 190 4 20 119 3 8 115 1841 26 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 _ RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 E Duration 0.25 Area Type: All Signal Combination 1 2 3 'Phase EB Left A Thru A Right A ' Peds X WB Left, A Thru A ' Right A Peds X NB Right 'SB Right Green 13.0 Yellow 5.0 'All Red 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs other areas Operations 4 1 5 i NB Left P 1 Thru P 1 Right P 1 Peds X SB Left P Thru P 1 Right P 1 Peds X 1 EB Right 1 WB Right 104.0 4.0 2.0 Southbound L T R I 1 1 3 1 L T R 132 2434 54 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 6 7 Intersection. Performance_ Summary Lppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 259 1770 0.68 0.146 59.9 E 258 1863 0.30 0.138 51.0 D 53.7 D ,T R 329 1583 0.27 0.208 43.6 D Westbound 'LT 154 1820 0.47 0.085 59.0 E 54.6 D R 317 1583 0.09 0.200 42.4 D Northbound 'L 139 0.56 0.638 26.3 C TR 2851 5078 0.63 0.562 13.8 B 14.3 B Southbound L 173 0.27 0.638 12.2 B T 2855 .5085 0.85 0.562 19.0 B 18.2 B 1181 1583 0.11 0.746 4.6 A 'R Intersection Delay = 19.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS.= B ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. '2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970).669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: College/Columbia City/State: Fort Collins Michael 'Analyst: Project No: 0075 Time Period Analyzed: short bkgrd w/split phase pm Date: 9/29/00 East/West Street Name: Columbia North/South Street Name: College 5u5+ CLPI�% HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 College/Columbia City/St: Fort Collins 'Inter: Analyst: Michael Proj #: 0075 Date: 9/29/00 Period: sl`hort bkgrd w/split phase pm ,E/W St: Columbia N/S St: Co eegge SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ _ Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 I I I 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 I 1 3 1 1 ,No. I L T R I LT R 1 L TR I L T R 1 Volume 1168 73 84 132 37 26 174 1688 16 145 2297 125 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 ' RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Lase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A i Thru P ' Right A I Right P Peds X X 1 Peds X Left A 1 SB Left A P ,WB Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X X I Peds X 'NB Right I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A Green 18.0 10.0 9.0 73.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 4.0 'Yellow All Red 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach 'Appr/ Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) _ v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 230 1245 0.77 0.185 65.0 E T 330 1863 0.23 0.177 46.3 D 52.8 D ,R 475 1583 0.19 0.300 33.9 C estbound 'LT 286 1548 0.26 0.185 45.8 D 42.2 D R 475 1583 0.06 0.300 32.5 C Northbound 140 0.56 0.731 16.6 B R 3320 5078 0.54 0.654 5.8 A 6.2 A Uouthbound 213 022 0.731 6.1 A T 3325 5085 0.73 0.654 7.8 A 7.4 A 1388 1583 0.10 0.877 1.1 A 'R Intersection Delay = 10.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 katthew' J. Delich Matthew J.. Delich, P.E. toveland, 272 Glen Haven Drive CO 80538: 'Phone: (970) 669-2061_ Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com _ OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 'Intersection: College/Columbia City/State: Fort Collins 'Pnalyst: Michael roject No: 0075 Time Period Analyzed: short bkgrd w/adjusted phasepm ate: 9/29/00 ast/West Street Name: Columbia orth/South Street Name: College 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ,Inter: College/Columbia City/St: Fort Collins Analyst: Michael Proj #: 0075,. Date: 9/29/00 Period: hort bkgrd w/adjusted phasepm r/W St: Columbia N/S St: College INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ I Eastbound __SIGNALIZED I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I ' L T R I L T R I L T R I L I T R 1 I I No. Lanes 1 1 'LGConfig I L I I 3 1 1 T R I I 1 I L I 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 I LT R I L TR 1 1 T R Volume 1168 73 84 132 37 26 174 1688 16 145 2297 125 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 i 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 tRTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X Left A I SB Left A P IWB Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X 'NB Right I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A Green 23.0 9.0 85.0 'Yellow 5 A 0.0 4.0 All Red- 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs 1 Appr/ Lane 'Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate _ (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 186 1206 0.95 0.154 106.5 F T 272 1863 0.28 0.146 50.0 D 475 1583 0.,19 0.300 33.9 C 'R Westbound 233 1517 0:31 0.154 49.7 D 'LT R 475 1583 0.06 0.300 32.5 C Northbound L 194 0.40 0.762 12.1 B ETR 3320 5078 0.54 0.654 5.8 A thb Approach Delay LOS 75.1 E 45.0 D ,6.0 A Sou ound �h 267 0.18 0.762 4.8 A rP 3325 5085 0.73 0.654 7.8 A 7.7 A R 1035 1583 0.13 0.654 8.8 A ' Intersection Delay = 12.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 tatthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive 1oveland, CO 80538 Phone:. (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 UMail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ntersection: College/Columbia ity/State: Fort Collins - Analyst: Michael (roject No: 0075 ime Period Analyzed: shrt bkgrd w/existing phase pm ate: 9/29/00 fast/West Street Name: Columbia orth/South Street Name: College HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 ,Inter: College/Columbia Analyst: Michael Date: 9/29/00 'E/W St: Columbia Eastbound L T R I City/St: Fort Collins P r of - Period: hrt bkgrd w/existing phase m: N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 .1 1 1 3 0 ,LGConfig I L T R 1 LT R I L TR Volume 1168 73 84 132 37 26 174 1688 16 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 'RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All Signal ,Phase Combination 1 2 3 EB Left A ' Thru A Right A Peds X 'WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds X JSB Right SB Right Green 19.0 ellow 5.0 11 Red 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs other areas Operations_ 4 1 1 NB Left i Thru Right 1 Peds 1 SB Left Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 1 EB Right 1 WB Right 5 A A A A 13.0 0.0 0.0 I Southbound L T R I 1 3 1 I L T R 145 2297 125 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 6 P P P X P P P X 85.0 4.0 2.0 7 8 APPENDIX D I UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay seelveh A <10 B > 10 and _< 15 C > 15 and < 25 D > 25 and < 35 E > 35 and _< 50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sectveh A _< 10 B > 10 and < 20 C > 20 and _< 35. D > 35 and < 55 E > 55 and _< 80 F > 80 APPENDIX C Intersection Performance Summary_ 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 149 1383 0.64 0.108 64.3 E 186 1863 0.02 0.100 52.8 D ,LT R 158 1583 0.13 0.100 53.7 D Westbound 'LT 147 1361 0.16 0.108 53.1 D R 158 1583 0.05 0.100 53.1 D Northbound ,L 82 101 0.20 0.808 8.1 A TR 4060 5075 0.47 0.800 0.4 A 'Southbound Approach Delay LOS 62.1 E 53.1 D 0.5 A L 154 191 0.22 0.808 6.2 A T 4068 5085 0.62 0.800 0.7 A 0.8 A 1266 1583 0.05 0.800 2.8 A ,R Intersection Delay = 2.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 'Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. '2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com _OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 'Intersection: College/Rutgers City/State: Fort Collins nalyst: Michael Project No: � 0075 Time Period Analyzed: reta m Date: /20 9e9 East/West Street Name: Rutgers orth/South Street Name: College ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 College/Rutgers City/St: Fort Collins 'Inter: Analyst: Michael Proj #: 0075 Date: 9/29/00 Period: recent'•a pm• ,E/W St: Rutgers N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 3 0 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 ,No. I L LT R I LT R 1 L TR I L T R Volume 190 4 20 119 3 8 115 1805 26 132 2386 54 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 'RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations . 'Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A I NB Left Thru A ► Thru ' Right A I Right Peds X I Peds Left A 1 SB Left 'WB Thru A 1 Thru Right A 1 Right 1 Peds B Right INX 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 13.0 Lellow 5.0 11 Red 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 1 secs 5 P P P X P P P X 104.0 4.0 2.0 6 7 8 Intersection Performance Summary_ 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane .Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 186 1206 0.95 0.154 106.5 F T 272 1863 0.26 0.146 50.0 D R 475 1583 0.19 0.300 33.9 C Westbound 'LT 233 1517 0.31 0.154 49.7 D R 475 1583 0.06 0.300 32.5 C Northbound Approach Delay LOS 75.1 E 45.0 D 'L 196 0.40 0.762 10.9 B TR 3320 5078 0.53 0.654 5.7 A 5.9 A Southbound L 273 0.17 0.762 4.7 A T 3325 5085 0.71 0.654 7.5 A 7.5 A R 1035 1583 0.13 0.654 8.8 A ' Intersection Delay = 12.5 (sec./veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. '2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.co ' Intersection: City/State: 'Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: ' East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: 1 Fax: (970) 669-5034 m OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS College/Columbia Fort Collins Michael 0075 recen am(:p 9/29/00 Columbia College HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 College/Columbia City/St: Fort Collins �nter: nalyst: Michael Proj #: 0075 Date: 9/29/00 Period: recent •a pm• ,E/W St: Columbia N/S St: College SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound i Westbound I Northbound ' L T R I L T R. I L T R No. Lanes I 1: I 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 ,No. I L T R I LT R. I L TR Volume 1168 73 84 132 37 26 174 1652 16 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 'RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Southbound L T R I I 1 3 1 I L T R 145 2249 125 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A ( NB Left A P ' Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X ,WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X �B Right I EB Right A SB Right 1 WB Right A Green 19.0 13.0 85.0 Yellow 5.0 0.0 4.0 11 Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs APPENDIX B MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 9.21.00 Observer: Michael Day: Thursday City: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: College/Rutgers S = straight I=1e$him Time Northbound: College Southbound: College Total Eastbound: Rutgers Westbound: Rutgers Total Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total Begins north/south eastlwest All 4:30 3 458 6 12 573 11 y596c= 1063 18 2 1 21';'. 4 0 4 8 29 1092 r467� • .. 4:45 5 433 10 � � 4 ARR- 7 597 13 817 1065 22 0 4 ,26 6 2 1 9 : 35 1100 5:00 2 473 6 484 9 622 19 OW 1131 31 1 8 � 40 ` 4 1 1 B' :. 46 1177 s� 5:15 5 441 4�450 � �+,-�i�. 4 594 11 y,6t19 1059 19 1 7 '",n .r ,�i till 5 0 2 7: 34 1093 427,€3 4:30.5 30 15 1805 26 1846 32 � ffi8 >&f 2472 4318 90 4� g40 , 114 19 3 E 8 : 30 144 4482 PHF 0.96 0.95 0.71 0.83 111111110 M M MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 9-21.00 Observer: Matt Day: Thursday City: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: College/Columbia S = straight I = laft him Time Northbound: College Southbound: College Total Eastbound: Columbia Westbound: Columbia Total Total L S I R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total Begins northisouth east/west All 4:30 19 418 34d0 8 537 32 u�57T" k 1017 43 16 1675 r^ 5 12 6 23 98 1115 4:45 19 396 4 k�419 11 566 29�y 1025 46 18 24 88„' S 8 6 t9"; 107 1132 rs",606 21 432 5458, t�fJ K'hivS°ws. u 8 589 35632 rJ b�" 1090 40 21 17 F '� W78^at 11 5 9 2S '" 103 119315 E15 406 4 "��A425 "" 18 557 29 604� 1029 39 18 27 i r'k64, 11 12 5 28! 112 1141 f' 4:30.5 30 ti7411652 16 1742 45,2249 125 2419 4161168m ? T384y t 325 32 37 26 ` 95 420 4581 ,.:ru .�..�z., PHF 0.95 0.96 0.92 0.85 1 APPENDIX A 1 ' IV. CONCLUSIONS ' This study assessed the impacts of the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment on the short range street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: - The development of the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development as plans currently indicate, the Montgomery Wards ' Redevelopment will generate approximately 3957 daily trip, ends and 436 afternoon peak hour trip ends. ' - Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable, overall. At the College/Columbia intersection, the eastbound minor street left turns operate at level of service F and the eastbound minor street leg operates at ' level of service E overall. At the College/Rutgers intersection, the eastbound minor street left turns and the eastbound minor street leg operates at level of service E. However, overall both intersections operate acceptably. - A signal warrant analysis was not conducted, since signals ' currently exist at the College/Columbia and College/Rutgers intersections. - In the short range future, given full development of the ' Montgomery Wards Redevelopment and an increase in background traffic, all key intersections will operate acceptably. Split phasing of the east and the west movement at the College/Columbia intersection will operate acceptably. This ' may alleviate some of the confusion that occurs at this intersection. The short range geometry is shown in Figure 8. At the College/Rutgers intersection, a single eastbound left - turn lane will operate acceptably. This left -turn lane ' should be 270 feet long. 19 ' Redevelopment. These are the commercial area (University Mall) south of the site, the residential area east of College Avenue, the business/office use northeast of the site, and the commercial uses north of the site. This site is in an area type termed "activity corridor" and "transit corridor." The level of service determination assumes that future developments will build their streets in ' accordance with Fort Collins Standards. This being the case, pedestrian facilities will exist where they currently do not. This is a reasonable assumption. As stated earlier, most of the sidewalks in this area were built prior to the current City standards. As ' such, some sidewalks will not meet current standards. There is nothing that this development can do to change this. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix H. The minimum level of ' service for "activity corridor" is B for all categories. The minimum level of service for "transit corridor" is B for all categories except for "visual interest & amenities" which is C. Bicycle Level of Service Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there is one destination area within 1320 feet of the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. This destination area is the University Mall, itself. While the proposed use is within the University Mall, the bicycle evaluation is provided. A bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in ' Appendix H. Bike access to the remainder of the University Mall area would be "on -site" and therefore, will not require bike lanes on public streets. The current base connectivity is at level of service F, since there are no bike facilities near this site. When the Mason Street Multimodal Corridor is implemented, the base connectivity will be at level of service B. Transit Level of Service Currently, Route 1 operates along College Avenue, adjacent to ' the site. Route 1 provides year-round service on 60 minute headways between 6:1eam and 6:40pm. In the future, there will be 10 minute transit service on the Mason Street Multimodal Corridor. It is ' anticipated that the level of service will be in the A category with implementation of the City's Transit Development Plan. A future transit level of service worksheet is provided in Appendix H. 18 With the split phasing, the amount of green time for the through movement will be reduced an average of 13 seconds (10% of the cycle). This may change from cycle to cycle depending upon the minor street movement demand. The Fort Collins Traffic Operations Division should determine whether this phasing scheme is acceptable. The College/Rutgers intersection will operate acceptably with the proposed single eastbound left -turn lane and a combined eastbound through/right-turn lane. The width of the west leg driveway is 33 feet. The three 11 foot lanes is acceptable. The single left -turn lane should be 270-360 feet long (minimum -desirable) according to the left -turn nomograph provided in Appendix F. From available plans, the distance from the stop bar to the north/south site circulation driveway is, approximately 280 feet. Therefore, the eastbound left - turn lane should extend from College Avenue to the site circulation driveway. In light of this, there should be no breaks in the curbing that defines this driveway from College Avenue. This is especially true for the south side of this -driveway where there is the potential that a vehicle entering the site may desire to turn left at a curb break, into the parking lot. This is less important for the north side of this driveway, since entering vehicles would be executing right turns. Exiting vehicles from the north side of this driveway (left turns) may be delayed in entering the eastbound queue due to a full left -turn lane. However, these will only cause delays within the parking lot and will not cause operational concerns at/near the College/Rutgers intersection. The geometry on the east leg of the College/Rutgers intersection has one lane in each direction. There is parking on both sides of Rutgers Avenue. The through lanes on the driveway on the west side of College Avenue will not line up exactly with the through lanes on Rutgers Avenue on the east side of College Avenue, due to" the left - turn lane on the west leg. College Avenue, plus the frontage road, is over 100 feet wide. An offset of half a lane is generally considered to be acceptable. The offset is likely to be 3 or 4 feet. This small offset will not be noticeable to a driver crossing from one side of College Avenue to the other. On -Site Intersection Control The on -site intersection shown in Appendix G is offset for the north/south driveway in front of the retail buildings. The driveway approaching from the east is a low volume driveway. The preferred control at this intersection is all -way stop sign control. This is similar to the control near the King Soopers Store to the south, at an intersection with much higher vehicular activity. An alternative would be stop sign control of the east leg, allowing the north/south driveway as the through movement. Given the slow speed on the north/south driveway, the jog caused by the offset should not present a safety concern. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix H shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. There will be four pedestrian destinations within a quarter mile of the Montgomery Wards 17 Jl{l� -1111� RT-iNRT-out m rn m 0 U JIlI� 1I1r SHORT RANGE GEOMETRY Rutgers Columbia N Figure 8 16 TABLE 4 Short Range (2004) Total Afternoon Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service PM College/Columbia (signal) Existing phasing/existing timing EB F WB D NB A SB A OVERALL B College/Columbia (signal) Existing phasing/adjusted timing EB D WB D NB A SB A OVERALL B College/Columbia (signal) Split phasing EB D WB D NB B SB C OVERALL C College/Rutgers (signal) Existing phasing/existing timing EB F WB D NB A SB A OVERALL B College/Rutgers (signal) Existing phasing/adjusted timing EB D WB D NB A SB A OVERALL B 15 TABLE 3 Short Range (2004) Background Afternoon Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service PM College/Columbia (signal) Existing phasing/existing timing EB E WB D NB A SB A OVERALL B College/Columbia (signal) Existing phasing/adjusted timing EB D WB D NB A SB A OVERALL B College/Columbia (signal) Split phasing EB D WB D NB B SB B OVERALL B College/Rutgers (signal) Existing phasing/existing timing EB E WB D NB A . SB A OVERALL A College/Rutgers (signal) Existing phasing/adjusted timing EB D WB D NB A SB A OVERALL A 14 o v LO �10 `- N M �— 25 ,r— 20 210 f r Rutgers 25 —► LO LO LO 80 1�-W`q u7 co LO u7 C1 1 RT-in/RT-out 5 rn a� 0 U Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles . ' co 25 co to — 0 co 35 35 180 Columbia I(' 75 o o to 90 SHORT RANGE (2004) TOTAL AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ' 13 N Figure 7 /(' 19 121 t 20 co ce) 60 RT-in/RT-out 3 �i 0 U SITE GENERATED AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Rutgers Columbia N Figure 6 12 Trip Assignment ' Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 6 shows the short range site generated peak hour traffic. Figure 7 shows the total (site ' plus background) short range peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform ' Traffic Control Devices. A signal warrant analysis was not conducted, since signals currently exist at the College/Columbia and College/ Rutgers intersections. Operation and Geometric Analyses Capacity analyses were performed on key intersections adjacent to ' the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year 2004 condition. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5, the key intersections operate in the short range background condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. In the scoping discussions, concern was expressed about the College/Columbia intersection. The single east/west phase, coupled ' with the long crossing distance (College Avenue plus the frontage road), create some concerns with regard to safety and efficiency. Geometric changes are not practical. Therefore, along with the current signal phasing at this intersection, a split phasing for the east/west ' movements was evaluated. Due to the extra clearance time, the split phase would reduce the College Avenue through time by 13 seconds (10% of the cycle). The goal in these analyses was to have no leg operating ' lower than level of service D. Operation with three phasing schemes are shown in Table 3: 1) existing phasing and timing; 2) existing phasing with timing adjusted to meet LOS D goal; and 3) split phasing for east/west with timing adjusted to meet LOS D goal. At the ' College/Rutgers intersection, the site plan indicates that a geometric change is proposed on the west leg. The proposal is to have a single left -turn lane and a combined through/right-turn lane. Two operations analyses are presented in Table 3 for the College/Rutgers intersection: ' 1) existing geometry and phase timing and 2) proposed geometry and phasing adjusted to meet LOS D goal. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7 and recommended geometrics, the intersections operate in the short range total condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The same analysis schemes are shown for the short range total traffic analysis in order to indicate a direct comparison. The key intersections will operate acceptably overall. The short range approach geometry is shown in Figure 8. The College/Columbia intersection will operate acceptably with the current geometry and the split phasing for the east/west movements. 11 qq V**cr)--- 8 19r d N MInNch .. 3 J —19 90 ) f r Rutgers 4 —"► Lo r- (0 20 aqo N c0 c0 Iq I- N RT-in/RT-out 1 m rn a) 0 U CM ~ 26 CM N � `I- c� `t �— 37 J � � —32 168 4*1 t r Columbia 73 IT w co 84 ~ co r- SHORT RANGE (2004) BACKGROUND AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 10 N Figure 5 10% ' TRIP DISTRIBUTION 1 9 ers nbia N Figure 4 C C g y ■ SITE PLAN zz Ns zZ m N � 55 m TEN WT 1 A TEHWfi 0 n TEWWf 3 U 13 UNIVERSITY CENTER PUD (REPLAT NO. 1 OF THE UNIVERSI MALL SHOPPING CENTER) SCALE: V=100' LOT t z Z �o (Q J K m W m N RUTGERS AVE Figure 3 ' III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Montgomery Wards Redevelopment is a commercial redevelopment of the former Montgomery Wards building, located in the University Mall in Fort Collins. Figure 3 shows the site plan. The short range analysis year was 2004. ' Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and afternoon peak hour basis. Since the bank land use has the highest peak hour trip generation of the potential pad uses, it was used for analysis purposes in this report. TABLE 2 Trip Generation Code Use Size AWDTE PM Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out 820 Retail 41.155 KSF 42.92 1766 1.80 74 1.94 80 820 Retail 5.159 KSF 42.92 221 1.80 9 1.94 10 820 Retail 23.951 KSF 42.92 1028 1.80 43 1.94 46 Subtotal 3015 126 136 832 Sit-down restaurant 7.0 KSF 130.34 912 6.52 46 4.34 30 OR 912 Bank 4.0 KSF 265.21 1061 27.38 110 27.38 110 912 Bank 2 windows 411.17 822 31.66 63 31.66 63 Average 942 87 87 OR 834 Fast-food Restaurant 3.5 KSF 496.12 1736 17.41 61 16.07 56 Total w/Bank 3957 213 223 Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. Future year data was obtained from the NFRRTP. Figure 4 shows the trip distribution used for the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. Background Traffic Projections Figure 5 shows the short range background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range future horizon was obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP. The traffic growth on College Avenue was calculated to be 2% for the year 2004. Minor street movements (turns) were not factored since these movements are directly related to development and redevelopment. 7 the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual. The key intersections operate acceptably overall. At the College/Columbia intersection, the eastbound minor street left turns operate at level of service F and the eastbound minor street leg operates at level of service E overall. At the College/Rutgers intersection, the eastbound minor street left turns and the eastbound minor street leg operates at level of service E. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better in this land use district. Experience indicates that if level of service D can be achieved during the peak hours, operation will be at level of service C or better for 20-22 hours of an average weekday. Small adjustments to the minor street phase time can eliminate the level of service E on the eastbound leg at each intersection. However, this will take some green time away from College Avenue, which may negatively impact the signal progression. Minor street legs are actuated with variable minor street green time depending on demand. Increasing the maximum minor street green time would improve the minor street operation when analyzing the full peak hour using the analysis techniques, but would probably have little effect on the actual operation in the field. Pedestrian Facilities There are pedestrian facilities on all area streets, however, they may not be up to current standards. This site is within 1320 feet of existing residential and business/office areas east of this site. It is also within 1320 feet of existing commercial uses to the north and south of the site. Pedestrian activity at the key intersections was observed and found to be relatively light in volume. There were very. few pedestrian crossings of College Avenue. Sidewalks are/will be incorporated to this development. Bicycle Facilities ' Bicycles are not permitted on College Avenue. There are no bicycle facilities directly connected to this site. In the future, implementation of the Mason Street Multimodal Corridor will provide a direct bike path connection to this site. ' Transit Facilities ' Currently, Route 1 operates along College Avenue, adjacent to the site. Route I provides year-round service on 60 minute headways between 6:18am and 6:40pm. 6 TABLE 1 Current Afternoon Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service PM College/Columbia (signal) EB E WB NB B B SB B OVERALL B College/Rutgers (signal) EB E wB NB A A SB A OVERALL A w �8 v M N LO N M 90 "**, t r Rutgers 4 i Lr) LO co 20 � �' 00 1�- N RT-in/RT-out 1 0 U Nrn 26 N LO �I N v -..— 37 32 / 1 ` f r Columbia 73 — v N cm 84 � (0 T RECENT AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N Figure 2 4 SITE LOCATION Montgomery Wards edevelopment SCALE: 1 "=2000' Figure 1 3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use ' Land uses in the area are primarily either residential, commercial, or business/office. Residential uses exist to the east across College Avenue. 'Commercial uses are south (University Mall) and north of the site. Business/office uses exist to the northeast across ' College Avenue. The site itself was in commercial use. Land in the area is primarily flat from a traffic operations perspective. There is a grade (increasing north to south) on College Avenue approaching Rutgers Avenue, however, this grade has little impact on traffic operations. The center of Fort Collins lies to the north of the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. Roads The primary streets near the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment are College Avenue, Columbia Avenue, and Rutgers Avenue. College Avenue is to the east of the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. It is an north -south highway designated as a major arterial in the "North Front Range Regional Transportation Plan," (NFRRTP) 10/94 and the Fort Collins ' Master Street Plan. College Avenue has a six lane cross section with a center median. There are turn lanes at appropriate intersections. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph. ' Columbia Avenue is south of the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. It is a east -west street designated as a collector on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. It has a two lane cross section near the site. The ' College/Columbia intersection has signal control. The west leg of Columbia Avenue enters the University Mall complex. Rutgers Avenue is just east of the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. ' It is a east -west street designated as a local street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. It has a two lane cross section near the site. The College/Rutgers intersection has signal control. The west leg of Rutgers Avenue enters the University Mall complex. ' Existing Traffic ' Recent afternoon peak hour turning movements at the key intersections are shown in Figure 2. Raw traffic count data is provided in Appendix A. The traffic data was collected in September, 2000. Existing Operation ' The College/Columbia and College/Rutgers intersections were evaluated. The afternoon peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. Appendix C describes level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from 2 I. INTRODUCTION This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near proposed development known as the Montgomery Wards Redevelopment. The Montgomery Wards Redevelopment is located west of College Avenue in the University Mall complex, near Rutgers Avenue, in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultants (ZTI) and the Fort Collins Traffic ' Engineering Staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines. This transportation impact study addresses issues related to the Montgomery ' Wards Redevelopment for the short range future. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; Determine afternoon peak hour traffic volumes; Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic ................... 4 3. Site Plan ............................................ 8 4. Trip Distribution .................................... 9 5. Short Range (2004) Background Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic .................................... 10 6. Site Generated Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic ........... 12 7. Short Range (2004) Total Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic .................................... 13 8. Short Range Geometry ................................. 16 APPENDIX A Recent Peak Hour Traffic B Current Peak Hour Operation C Level of Service Descriptions D Short Range Background Traffic Operation E Short Range Total Traffic Operation F West Leg of Rutgers Left -turn Analysis G On -Site Intersection H Alternative Mode Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions_ .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Roads................................................ 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 2 ExistingOperation ................................... 2 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 6 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 6 Transit Facilities ................................... 6 III. Proposed Development ................................. 7 Trip Generation ...................................... 7 Trip Distribution .................................... 7 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 7 Trip Assignment ...................................... 11 Signal Warrants ...................................... 11 Operation and Geometric Analyses ..................... 11 On -Site Intersection Control ......................... 17 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 17 BicycleLevel of Service ............................. 18 Transit Level of Service ............................. 18 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 19 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Current Afternoon Peak Hour Operation ................ 5 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 7 3. Short Range (2004) Background Traffic Afternoon Peak Hour Operation 14 4. Short Range (2004) Total Traffic Afternoon Peak Hour Operation ........................ 15 MONTGOMERY WARDS REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO OCTOBER 2000 Prepared for: ZTI Group/Architecture 2120 South College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80525 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 OPP �W J. O STF; 15253 `r