Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNIVERSITY CENTER P.U.D. (WARDS REDEVELOPMENT) - MINOR AMENDMENT / REPLAT - 40-01 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSMr. Steve Olt February 23, 2001 Page 3 of 3 31. The sidewalk along College Avenue has been extended north of Rutgers 32. The crosswalk will be enhanced 33. Noted 34. Ramps have been added Stormwater 35. The only existing "on -site detention" on the site was provided by the area inlets and subsequent parking lot ponding. The same number of area inlets will remain, with the existing ponding being provided as the inlets and outfall pipes are not being enlarged. Natural Resources 36. Trash enclosures are provided (and labeled), including provisions for recycling Planning 37. We have adjusted our landscape islands to respond to this comment. We have, however, left 1 parking row with 16 cars which is adjacent to our well landscaped plaza 38. See response 6. 39. See response 6 These comments were prepared by JR engineering and Ed Zdenek. We look forward to working with the City to finalize this project. If you have any questions or comments, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 491-9888. Thank you. Sincerely, C lJ David W. Klockeman, PE Division Manager cc: Ed Zdenek, ZTI Group Ty Fangman, Dial Companies N i Mr. Steve Olt February 23, 2001 Page 2 of 3 9. Water/Wastewater — these have been addressed on the revised plans (In addition, we have added notes to the drawings regarding landscape / utility separations and we have adjusted our landscaping in response to the W/WW comments) 10. Natural Resources a. Trash enclosures have been labeled (they were previously shown) b. Trash enclosures will provide room for recycling C. Trash enclosures are adequately screened 11. Utility Education Specialist — We have added notes to our drawings regarding water conservation standards. 12. Traffic Operations Comments - these have been addressed on the revised plans (We have revised the drive in front of the building in response to Eric's comments and have extended our left turn lane at the entrance to exceed 270') 13. Transportation Planning Comments = these have been addressed on the ievised plans (We have a continuous sidewalk system around the building but have eliminated sidewalks west of our parking lot based on a meeting held with City staff; We have extended sidewalk to north edge of site) 14. City Forester Comments — the landscape plans have been revised to address the comments 15. Technical Services (Mapping) Department Comments a. The legal description has been revised to show measured courses b. The required plat statements have been added C. A vicinity map has been added d. The plat has been revised to look like a final plat e. The quality of the plat has been improved -16. Transfort Comments — See response 8. 17. Street Oversizing Comments — fee comments are noted Engineering 18. Access easement has been added 19. See response 8. 20. Subdivision plat has been revised to show correct language, etc. 21. The revised plans show this information 22. All improvements are proposed within the limits of the site or within public right-of-way 23. The south access point has been eliminated so there will be no left turn conflict. The north access does not propose any conflicts and this has been agreed to by Eric Bracke and Matt Delich. 24. The parking lot layout was approved by the Director of CPES 25. They will be raised 26. The building envelope has been added Transportation Planning 27. Bicycle parking has been added 28. Sidewalk system has been modified slightly to meet the criteria 29. The requirements for the pedestrian connection to the Mason Street Corridor have been agreed to by the City and Developer and are shown on the plans 30. These sidewalks have been straightened 31 February 23, 2001 Mr. Steve Olt, Project Planner City of Fort Collins — CPES Current Planning 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 `,V J•R ENGINEERING A Sohn H�mry n� Nr•.0 i.u. Re: Wards Redevelopment — Responses for October 25, 2000 Review Comments Dear Steve: The following are responses to the City's review comment letter of October 25, 2000. 1. Information only related to zoning. 2. Post Office — No Comments 3. Light & Power — No Comments 4. Poudre Fire Authority — a. The knox box has been added b. Address numerals will conform to requirement C. Fire hydrants spacing meets criteria d. Building A will be fire sprinklered e. Building B is subject to future review 5. Public Service — No Comments 6. Zoning a. No action required b. Handicapped stalls have been revised C. No action required d. Bays have been revised to 38 feet e. Bicycle racks have been added f. A cross -lot parking easement will be provided g. Cross access and parking easements are in place between the development to the south and this project. h. We have corrected our delineation on the west property line to illustrate a 5' buffer and added notes regarding both the maintenance of the existing (off -site) landscaping and the additional trees that may be required. i. We have revised the north, west and east elevations to embellish the fenestration. 7. Stormwater Comments — these have been addressed with the revised plans and drainage report 8. Engineering Comments — We have adjusted the entry drive to provide a left turn lane in excess of 270 `; we have adjusted the sidewalks as required; we have added notes to the drawing regarding the transit stop 2620 Fast Prospect Road, Suite 190, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970A91-9888 • Fax: 97OA91-9984 • wJrengineering.wm