Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CENTERPOINT PLAZA - PDP - 35-01 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY
APPENDIX E 1 1 64 1 ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0153 ,East/West Street: North/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 8/14/01 am pm Mi point/Access B Fort Collins recent short bkgrd total, Midpoint Access B ,Intersection Orientation: EW Vehicle Volumes and Major Street: Approach Eastbound Mov t 1 2 Study period (hrs): 0.25 Adjustments Westbound 3 4 5 6 emen L T R i L T R Volume 15 115 5 5 100 45 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 'Peak Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 135 5- 5 117 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ■voiume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage T Channelized? Lanes 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 5 1 11 58 1 47 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service �■�PPproach EB WB Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR 1 LTR I LTR 17 5 17 106 k(vph) (m) (vph) 1409 1443 749 710 /c 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.15 95% queue length 0.04 0.01 0.07 0.52 ontrol Delay 7.6 7.5 9.9 11.0 OS A A A B Approach Delay 9.9 11.0 Approach LOS A B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich (atthew J. Delich, P.E. �3 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 8414/01 Analysis Time Period: (fd�) pm Intersection: Midpoint/Access B Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Fort Coll' recent ort.bkgr total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street: Midpoint North/South Street: Access B Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 30 325 10 5 80 75 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 382 11 5 94 88 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 1 5 35 1 45 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1 5 41 1 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 _ 7 8 9. I . 10 . 11 - 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR . I LTR v (vph) 35 5 11 94 C(m) (vph) 1393 1166 456 573 v/c 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.16 95% queue length 0.08 0.01 0.07 0.58 Control Delay 7.7 8.1 13.1 12.5 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 13.1 12.5 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1E ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY EAnalyst: gency/Co.: ate Performed: Analysis Time Period: ntersection: urisdiction: alysis Year: Project ID: 0153 ast/West Street: orth/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 8/19 O1 am m Midpoint/Access A Fort Coll' s recent short bkgrd total Midpoint Access A Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 20 70 15 15 100 30 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 085 085 0.85 085 085 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 82 17 17 117 35 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided T Channelized? anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ■,7olume 20 1 35 30 1 60 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 1 41 35 1 70 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 ercent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage lared Approach: Exists? No No Storage T Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 configuration LTR LTR Delay, pproach EB ovement 1 ane Config LTR Queue Length, and Level WB Northbound 4 1 7 8 LTR I LTR of Service Southbound 10 11 12 LTR (vph) 23 17 65 106 (m) (vph) 1429 1494 759 768 /c 0.02 0.01 0.09 0.14 95% queue length 0.05 0.03 0.28 0.48 ontrol Delay 7.6 7.4 10.2 10.4 OS A A B B pproach Delay 10.2 10.4 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich (atthew J. Delich, P.E. W I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 1 TWO-WAY STOP.CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 8/14/01 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: idpoint/Access A Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Fort Collins , recent or bkgr total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street: Midpoint North/South Street: Access A Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments , Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R , Volume 45 320 35 25 55 50 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 52 376 41 29 64 ' 58 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 , Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 1 20 25 1 60 , Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 1 23 29 1 70 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 ' Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage ' RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 ' 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 52 29 41 100 C(m) (vph) 1465 1142 447 ' 623 v/c 0.04 0.03 0.09 0.16 95% queue length 0.11 0.08 0.30 0.57 Control Delay 7.5 8.2 13.9 11.9 LOS A A B ' B Approach Delay 13.9 11.9 Approach LOS B B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 , Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. V HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: tntersection: urisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0153 East/West Street: orth/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 8/1 pm Prospect/Specht Point Fort Collins recent s ort bkgrd total - Prospect Road Specht Point Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.94 0.94 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 1068 187 31 1478 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type TWLTL Channelized? CT anes 2 0 1 2 onfiguration T TR L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Elinor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R tJolume 175 'peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 205 Fercent Heavy Vehicles 2 ercent Grade (%) 0 Median Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? Yes iT Storage 1 Channelized? Lanes 0 0 .Configuration LR 0.85 64 2 17 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service tpproach EB WB Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 1. 7. 8 9 1 10 11 12 ne Config L I LR I (vph) (m) (vph) /c 95% queue length ontrol Delay OS pproach Delay Approach LOS 31 269 709 518 0.04 0.52 0.14 2.96 10.3 19.2 B C 19.2 C ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich iatthew J. Delich, P.E. 5 I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 8/14/01 Analysis Time Period pm Intersection: rospect/Specht Point Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent ort bkgrd total, Project ID: 0153 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: Specht Point Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1140 335 40 880 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1266 372 47 1035 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 1 2 Configuration T TR L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R vo.iume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (8) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 120 45 0.85 0.85 141 52 2 2 0 0 Yes 1 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 47 193 C(m) (vph) 476 438 -v/c 0.10 0.44 95% queue length 0.33 2.20 Control Delay 13.4 19.5 LOS B C Approach Delay 19.5 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. h.� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY MAnalyst: gency/Co.: ate Performed: .Analysis Time Period: ntersection: trisdiction: u alysis Year: Project ID: 0153 Last/West Street: orth/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 8/14/01 am m Ti erline/Midpoint Fort Coll' recent short bkgrd total Midpoint Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1000 105 1615 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 095 095 092 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 1052 110 1755 ercent Heavy Vehicles -- Median Type Undivided T Channelized? No anes 2 1 2 onfiguration T R T Upstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Wolume 18U Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 211 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 ercent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage dared Approach: Exists? Storage T Channelized? No Lanes 1 .Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ane Config I R 1 (vph) 211 (m) (vph) 878 /c 0.24 95% queue length 0.94 ontrol Delay 10.4 OS B pproach Delay 10.4 Approach LOS B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich �atthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 8/14/01 Analysis Time Period: ® pm Intersection: Timberline/Midpoint Jurisdiction: Fort Coll' Analysis Year: recent hort bkgr total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street: Midpoint North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R .1 L T R Volume 1215 400 1125 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1292 425 1209 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 2 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 130 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 152 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I v (vph) 152 C(m) (vph) 834 _v/c 0.18 95% queue length 0.66 Control Delay 10.3 LOS B Approach Delay 10.3 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Intersection Performance Summary_ ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS astbound L 265 1770 0.10 0.54 13.9 B R 1657 3526 0.64 0.47 22.1 C kestbound 264 1770 0.09 0.54 13.9 B 1663 3539 0.64 0.47 22.0 C 744 1583 0.02 0.47 14.3 B Northbound 418 tR 1101 0.94 0.38 59.8. E 599 1619 0.24 0.37 22.0 C ISouthbound L 467 1228 0.16 0.38 20.7 C Approach Delay LOS 21.9 C 21.7 C TR 589 1592 0.33 0.37 22.9 C 22.3 C Intersection Delay = 26.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 �atthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 ,Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Drgency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, .P.E. Date Performed: 11G7/00 Analysis Time Period: am(pm) f ntersection: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway rea Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins ,Pnalysis Year: recent short bkgrd ota roject ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Road Prospect Parkway HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 11/17/00 Period: amQ Project ID: 0153 E/W St: Prospect Road 1 Eastbound I L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 LGConfig I L TR Volume 125 945 25 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 Inter.: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent 0or bkgrd<jotal N/S St: Prospect Parkway SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 L T I R I L T R I L T R I -1 1 I I _ I , 1 1 1 0 1 I 1 2 1 1 1 0 I L T R I L TR I L TR 1 120 925 15 1335 15 105 165 5 160 1 , 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A P 1 NB Left Thru P I Thru Right P 1 Right Peds X 1 Peds WB Left A P I SB Left Thru P 1 Thru Right P 1 Right Peds X 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 47.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 5 A A A X A A A X 6 7 37.0 3.0 2.0 Cycle Length:.100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary_ tppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 392 1770 0.34 0.61 10.2 B R 1880 3482 0.67 0.54 18.5 B kestbound 263 1770 0.33 1911 3539 0.44 855 1583 0.03 orthbound 426 1374 0.40 R 503 1676 0.07 touthbound 424 1367 0.03 TR 509 1695 0.06 Intersection Delay = 17.4 0.61 13.3 B 0.54 14.6 B 0.54 10.8 B 0.31 27.8 C 0.30 25.1 C 0.31 24.0 0.30 25.0 (sec/veh) Approach Delay LOS 17.7 B 14.4 B 27.3 C C C 24.7 C Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 atthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive oveland, CO 80538 hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. �gency/Co.: ate Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am pm Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway tintersection: rea Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Year: Fort Collins recent ort-,bkgrd total tnalysis roject ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Road Prospect Parkway 53 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 11/17/00 Period: pm m Project 0153 E/W St: Prospect Road I Eastbound I L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 LGConfig I L TR Volume 1115 955 115 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left A Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 6.0 Yellow 0.0 All Red 0.0 Inter.: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent hor bkgrd otal, N/S St: Prospect Parkway SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ► Westbound I Northbound ► L T R I L T R I I 1 1 2 1 ► 1 1 0 I L T R I L TR 180 760 20 1145 10 20 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 1 0 I Southbound I L T R 1 1 1 0 L TR 110 10 15 112.0 12.0 1 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations _ 2 3 4 .1 .5 6 7 8 P ► NB Left A P I Thru A P I Right A X I Peds X P 1 SB Left A P I Thru A P I Right A x I Peds X I EB Right ► WB Right 54.0 30.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 6 Z HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 11/17/00 Period: am m Project ID: 0153 E/W St: Prospect Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Coll' s Year : recent short long bkgr total N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound I L T I R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes I I 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 LGConfig i L T R I L TR L T R I L TR Volume 1110 850 610 1460 1025 80 1450 520 215 140 545 150 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ■ _Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A ' Thru P I Thru A A Right P I Right A A Peds X 1 Peds g , WB Left A A 1 SB Left A Thru A P I Thru A Right A P 1 Right ' A Peds X I Peds X NB Right A A I EB Right A A SB Right I WB Right ' Green 10.0 7.0 32.0 6.0 9.0 26.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 ' 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 1 0 1 ppr Lane Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS aStLVullu L 159 1770 0.70 0.09 57.4 T 1309 3539 0.89 0.37 38.9 886 1583 0.42 0.56 13.0 estbound 309 3433 0.73 0.09 53.1 tR 1299 3510 0.72 0.37 30.5 Northbound 515 3433 0.91 0.15 62.8 1380 3539 0.46 0.39 22.9 R 823 1583 0.59 0.52 17.7 outhbound 124 1770 0.71 0.07 62.7 TR 1073 3462 0.79 0.31 35.6 Intersection Delay = 34.8 (sec/veh) E D 34.4 C B D C 34.9 C E C 33.2 C B E D 38.2 D Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 atthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 hone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com tOPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: m pm imberline/Prospect intersection: rea Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Year: recent short long bkgrd total fralysis oject ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street ' Prospect Timberline ' 41 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 11/17/00 Period: pm Project( : 0153 E/W St: Prospect Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Coll' Year : recent short long bkgr total N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 LGConfig ( L T R I L TR I L T R I L TR I Volume 195 990 315 1195 760 45 1400 535 410 175 615 105 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A ' Thru P 1 Thru A A Right P 1 Right A A Peds X I Peds X , WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P 1 Right ' A Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right _ A I EB Right A A SB Right I WB Right , Green 8.0 37.0 6.0 8.0 31.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 ' Cycle Length: 100.0 secs AO APPENDIX D 4-1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID:• 0153 East/West Street: North/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 8/14/01 am p Mi point/Access B Fort Collilas recent Eit bkgr total Midpoint Access B Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 15 80 5 5 85 45 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 94 5 5 99 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 1 5 50 1 40 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1 5 58 1 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR 1 LTR 1 LTR v (vph) 17 5 11 106 C(m) (vph) 1430 1494 738 764 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.14 95% queue length 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.48 Control Delay 7.5 7.4 10.0- 10.5 LOS A A A B Approach Delay, 10.0- 10.5 Approach LOS A B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 4� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY glAnalyst; Michael gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 8/14/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm tersection: idpoint/Access B urisdiction: � Fort Collins alysis Year: recent or kgr total Project ID: 0153 ast/West Street: Midpoint orth/South Street: Access B Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 30 305 5 5 60 75 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 358 5- 5 70 88 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided T Channelized? anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No ir inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R olume 5 1 5 35 1 45 eak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1 5 41 1 52 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 ercent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage T Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 configuration LTR LTRLTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach EB WE Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR (vph) 35 5 11 94 (m) (vph) 1422 1196 487 609 /c 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.15 95% queue length 0.08 0.01 0.07 0.54 ontrol Delay 7.6 8.0 12.6 12.0 OS k A A B B pproach Delay 12.6 12.0 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich f atthew J. Delich, P.E. 45 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0153 East/West Street: North/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 8/14 O1 am(pis] Mi point/Access A Fort Col recent hort bkgrd total Midpoint Access A Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 70 100 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 82 117 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 30 60 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 70 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I I LR v (vph) 23 105 C (m) (vph) 1429 837 v/c 0.02 0.13 95% queue length 0.05 0.43 Control Delay 7.6 9.9 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.9 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ealyst:Michael ncy/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, Va P.E. te Performed: 8/14/01 Analysis Time Period: m tersection: idpoint/Access A risdiction: Fort Collns tualysis Year: recent hort kgrd, otal Project ID: 0153 Street: Midpoint Fast/West orth/South Street: Access A Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 45 315 55 50 Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 (eak-Hour ourly Flow Rate, HFR 52 370 64 58 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type Undivided Channelized? (T anes 0 1 1 0 onfiguration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R —Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ercent Heavy Vehicles ercent Grade (%) Median Storage flared Approach: Exists? Storage T Channelized? Lanes Wonfiguration Delay, Approach EB ovement 1 ane Config LT (vph) 52 (m) (vph) 1465 /c 0.04 95% queue length 0.11 ontrol Delay 7.5 OS A Approach Delay Approach LOS A Queue Length, and Level of WB Northbound 4 1 7 8 9 0.85 0.85 29 70 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR Service Southbound 1 10 11 12 1 LR ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich (atthew J. Delich, P.E. ^ 736 0.13 0.46 10.7 B 10.7 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0153 East/West Street: North/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. am &ml 1 am m Prospect/Specht Point Fort Collins recent shor bkgrd total Prospect Road Specht Point Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 940 150 30 1365 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1068 170 31 1452 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 1 2 Configuration T TR L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 165 55 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 194 64 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 31 256 C(m) (vph) 717 521 v/c 0.04 0.50 95% queue length 0.14 2.72 Control Delay 10.2 18.5 LOS B C Approach Delay 18.5 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 42 ' HCS2000: Unsignalized.Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY IlA-n-alyst : Michael §gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 8 4/01 Analysis Time Period: am m rospect/Specht Point Mintersection: urisdiction: Fort Coll' Analysis Year: recent hort kgr total Project ID: 0153 ast/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: Specht Point Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 , Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 1140 310 40 865 Factor, PHF 090 090 0.85 085 (eak-Hour ourly Flow Rate, HFR 1266 344 47 1017 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL Channelized? (T anes 2 0 1 2 onfiguration T TR L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ff4inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R olume 115 45 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 135 52 iercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 ppercent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 T Channelized? Lanes 0 0 configuration LRLR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Pproach EB WB Northbound ovement Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 (ane 1 10 11 12 Config L I LR I (vph) 47 187 (m) (vph) 484 438 /c 0.10 0.43 95% queue length 0.32 2.10 ontrol Delay 13.2 19.2 OS B C Approach Delay 19.2 LOS CLOS C Approach ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release.4.1. .. Matthew J. Delich fatthew J. Delich, P.E. I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael ' Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 8/1�4 01 Analysis Time Period: amC)rR,.' Intersection: Timberline/Midpoint ' Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent shor ,bkgr total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street: Midpoint ' North/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments , Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L ' T R Volume 1000 90 1580 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1052 94 ' 1717 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 ' 2 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound ' Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R i L T R Volume 160 ' Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85. Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 188 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 , Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage , RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R , Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 ' 1 10 11 12 Lane Config R v (vph) 188 C(m) (vph) 878 , v/c 0.21 95% queue length 0.81 Control Delay 10.2 LOS ' B Approach Delay 10.2 Approach LOS B 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 ' Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. l ' ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: Michael gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 8/14/01 Analysis Time Period: ® pm Timberline/Midpoint Wntersection: urisdiction: Fort Collins alysis Year: recent shor kgrd total Project ID: 0153 ast/West Street: Midpoint orth/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R volume izib 3bu 110b eak-Hour Factor, PHF 094 094 093 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 1292 382 1188 ercent Heavy Vehicles -- Median Type Undivided Channelized? No (T anes 2 1 2 onfiguration T R T Upstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 135 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 ercent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Tared Approach: Exists? Storage T Channelized? No Lanes 1 .Confiquration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ��1PPproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound I-vement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ane Config I R I (vph) 135 (m) (vph) 834 /c 0.16 95% queue length 0.58 Delay 10.1 kontrol S B proach Delay 10.1 Approach LOS B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich (atthew J. Delich, P.E. 39 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS zastoouna L 272 1770 0.10 0.55 13.3 TR 1692 3526 0.63 0.48 21.2 Westbound L 272 1770 0.08 0.55 13.3 T 1699 3539 0.63 0.48 21.1 R 760 1583 0.02 0.48 13.7 Northbound L 405 1094 0.90 0.37 52.5 TR 583 1620 0.23 0.36 22.6 Southbound L 459 1240 0.17 0.37 21.3 TR 573 1592 0.34 0.36 23.7 Intersection Delay = 25.0 (sec/veh) B C 21.0 C B C 20.8 C B D C 44.4 D C C 23.0 C Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent or bkgrd total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Road Prospect Parkway 0 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 alyst: Michael gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 11/17/00 'Period: am -pm Project ID. 0153 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent shor bkgrd/total N/S St: Prospect Parkway I SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R o. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L TR I L TR tolume 125 945 25 120 925 15 1310 15 100 165 5 160 ane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 ■Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations hase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 B Left A P I NB Left Thru P I Thru Right P I Right Peds X I Peds B Left A P 1 SB Left Thru P 1 Thru ' Right P I Right Peds X I Peds NB Right 1 EB Right tB Right 1 WB Right reen 6.0 48.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 �11 Red 0.0 2.0 6 7 8 A A X A A X 36.0 3.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound . L 392 TR 1880 Westbound _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1770 0.34 0.61 3482 0.67 0.54 L 263 1770 0.31 T 1911 3539 0.44 R 855 1583 0.03 Northbound L 426 1374 0.36 TR 503 1676 0.07 Southbound L 424 1367 0.03 TR 509 1695 0.06 Intersection Delay = 17.3 0.61 0.54 0.54 0.31 0.30 10.2 B 18.5 B 13.1 B 14.6 B 10.8 B 27.3 C 25.1 C 0.31 24.0 0.30 25.0 (sec/veh) 17.7 B 14.4 B 26.9 C C C 24.7 C Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. . Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: 4�90 pm Intersection: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent hort bkgr total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Road Prospect Parkway 3(P 1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Coll' am pm Year recent short bk r total 'Period: Project ID: 0153 E/W St: Prospect Road NIS St: Prospect Parkway SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I L T R I L T R I L T R ko. Lanes 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 I 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L TR Volume 1115 955 115 175 760 20 1130 10 20 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 ration 0.25 rhase Combinat B Left Thru Right Peds kB Left ' Thru Right Peds NB Right B Right treen Yellow Ir11 Red Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ 1 2 3 4 1 A P I NB Left P 1 Thru P I Right X I Peds A P I SB Left P I Thru P I Right X I Peds I EB Right I WB .Right 6.0 54.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 C A A X A A X Southbound L T R 1 1 0 L TR 10 10 15 12.0 12.0 0 30.0 3.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 35 Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 177 1770 0.68 0.10 53.8 T 1132 3539 0.82 0.32 37.8 R 823 1583 0.81 0.52 26.3 Westbound L 584 3433 0.78 0.17 46.6 TR 1365 3501 0.87 0.39 34.5 Northbound L 549 3433 0.80 0.16 48.7 T 1274 3539 0.41 0.36 24.3 R 902 1583 0.24 0.57 10.9 Southbound L 124 1770 0.33 0.07 45.8 TR 925 3425 0.88 0.27 45.1 Intersection Delay = 36.4 (sec/veh) D D C D C D C B Approach Delay LOS 34.4 C 37.9 D 30.9 C D D 45.1 D Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Ti erline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent ort long bkgrd total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline e�'4 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins ,Period: am(OD Year recent short long kgrd total Pr t ID• 0153 o�ec E/W St: Prospect N/S St: Timberline _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I L T R I L T R 1 L T R No. Lanes 1-- 1 1 2 1 -1----- I-1--2 2 0 I 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R 'Volume 1110 840 610 1425 1025 80 1430 515 215 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 tion 0.25 Combination 1 'Phase EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left A Thru Right Peds NB Right A 'SB Right Green 9.0 Yellow 0.0 J11 Red 0.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations - 2 3 4 1 I NB Left P I Thru P i Right X I Peds A I SB Left A P I Thru A P I Right X I Peds A I EB Right WB Right Southbound L T R I 1 1 2 0 I L TR 135 545 150 112.0 12.0 1 0 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A A A A X A A 7.0 32.0 6.0 9.0 27.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs -0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS Eastbound L 159 1770 0.70 0.09 57.4 E T 1309 3539 0.87 0.37 37.5 D 33.1 C R 902 1583 0.41 0.57 12.4 B Westbound L 309 3433 0.66 0.09 49.0 D TR 1299 3510 0.72 0.37 30.5 C 33.8 C Northbound L 549 3433 0.84 0.16 51.6 D T 1345 3539 0.46 0.38 23.6 C 30.2 C R 807 1583 0.60 0.51 18.5 B Southbound L 142 1770 0.58 0.08 50.1 D TR 1039 3462 0.82 0.30 37.6 D 38.7 D Intersection Delay = 33.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: recent shor, long bkgr total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline 32 ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Prospect Agency: Matthew-J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Fort Coll' s am pm Year recent short long bkgrd total Feriod: roject D.• 0153 E/W St: Prospect NIS St: Timberline ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 1 1I_ I_ 2 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 _ 0 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L TR 1 'Volume 195 970 315 1175 760 45 1390 530 410 170 615 105 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 _RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Combination 1 ,Phase EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left A Thru Right Peds Right A 'NB SB Right Green 8.0 Yellow 0.0 'All Red 0.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 1 I NB Left P I Thru P I Right X I Peds 1 SB Left P I Thru P 1 Right X I Peds 1 EB Right I WB Right 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A A A X 37.0 7.0 8.0 30.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs ,jk APPENDIX C 30 1 ' UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level--of-Service Average Total Delay seclveh A _< 10 B >10and<15 C > 15 and _< 25 D > 25 and < 35 E >35and <50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sedveh A <10 B >10and<<20 C > 20 and _< 35. D >35and <55 E > 55 and _< 80 F. >80 29 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID:. 0153 East/West Street: North/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 8119 01 pm Prospect/Specht Point Fo Collins recen short bkgrd total Prospect Road Specht Point Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 873 46 5 1267 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 992 52 5 1347 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 1 2 Configuration T TR L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 62 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 72 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound , Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 5 101 t C(m) (vph) 1138 1198 _ v/c 0.00 0.08 95% queue length 0.01 0.28 Control Delay 8.2 8.3 , LOS A A Approach Delay 8.3 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 ' Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Z$ 1 ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: Michael tn ency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 8 14/01 Analysis Time Period: am pm tntersection: Prospect/Specht Point Jurisdiction: Fo ollins alysis Year: recentr short bkgrd total Project ID: 0153 ast/West Street: Prospect Road orth/South Street: Specht Point Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R t L T. R Volume 983 131 10 801 -Hour Factor, PHF 090 090 0.85 085 teak ourly Flow Rate, HFR 1092 145 11 942 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL Channelized? (T anes 2 0 1 2 onfiguration T TR L T Upstream Signal? Yes Yes ir inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Evoiume 4U Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 .Configuration LR N 0.85 28 2 L Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Cpproach EB WB Northbound . Southbound ovement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ne Config L I LR I (vph) 11 75 'v C(m) (vph) 860 1202 v/c 0.01 0.06 95% queue length 0.04 0.20 Delay 9.2 8.2 'Control LOS A A Approach Delay 8.2 Approach LOS A ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2,1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: Analysis Time Period Intersection: Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: 0153 East/West Street: North/South Street: Michael Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 8/14/01 am (g7 Timberline/Midpoint Collins recent hort bkgrd total Midpoint Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 761 53 1045 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 801 55 1135 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume bZ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 72 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config . 1 . R I.. v (vph) 72 C(m) (vph) 784 v/c 0.09 95% queue length 0.30 Control Delay 10.1 LOS B Approach Delay 10.1 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2(P ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY IlAnalyst: Michael gency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ate Performed: 8/14/01 Analysis Time Period: am�,pm imberline/Midpoint Wntersection: urisdiction: Collins alysis Year: ecent `short bkgrd total Project ID: 0153 ast/West Street: Midpoint forth/South Street: Timberline Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R 1 L T R Volume 771 284 725 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.93 ,Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 820 302 779 ercent Heavy Vehicles -- Median Type Undivided T Channelized? No anes 1 1 1 onfiguration T R T Upstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume 11 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 .Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I (vph) 12 'v C (m) (vph) 777 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.05 Control Delay 9.7 LOS A Approach Delay 9.7 Approach LOS A ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 25 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 317 1770 0.07 0.57 11.5 B TR 1765 3529 0.55 0.50 18.4 B 18.3 B Westbound L 316 1770 0.07 0.57 11.4 B T 1770 3539 0.54 0.50 18.3 B 18.1 B R 792 1583 0.02 0.50 12.6 B Northbound L 387 1107 0.86 0.35 47.1 D TR 549 1616 0.22 0.34 23.7 C 40.8 D Southbound L 443 1266 0.16 0.35 22.6 C TR 538 1583 0.34 0.34 25.0 C 24.3 C Intersection Delay = 22.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am� Intersection: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: For Collins Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Road Prospect Parkway 24 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Agency: Date: 'Period: Proj ect E/W St: Michael Inter.: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 11/1�00 Jurisd: Fort Collins am Year ecen short bkgrd total ID: 0153 Prospect Road N/S St: Prospect Parkway ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound I L T R I L T R T R I L I L T R i No. Lanes 1-1-2 1 1 0 I LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L TR I L TR Volume 121 861 16 118 835 11 1281 12 90 161 0 156 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 Fhase B Left A P I NB Left A Thru P i Thru A Right P 1 Right A Peds X 1 Peds X B Left A P I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P 1 Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right IB Right I WB Right reen Yellow I11 Red 6.0 50.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 34.0 3.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs ,3 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 431 1770 0.31 0.61 9.6 A TR 1884 3489 0.56 0.54 16.4 B 15.6 B Westbound L 319 1770 0.23 0.61 10.7 B T 1911 3539 0.39 0.54 14.0 B 13.6 B R 855 1583 0.02 0.54 10.8 B Northbound L 427 1379 0.34 0.31 27.1 C TR 506 1685 0.07 0.30 25.0 C 26.7 C Southbound L 425 1370 0.02 0.31 24.0 C TR 501 1669 0.05 0.30 24.9 C 24.7 C Intersection Delay = 15.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: rospect Road/Prospect Parkway Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: ecent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Road Prospect Parkway 22 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 rnalyst: Michael gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 11/17/00 ,Period: � pm Project ID: 0153 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway Area Type: All other areas Jurisd:-Fort Collins Year recen short bkgrd total N/S St: Prospect Parkway i SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION.SUMMARY I Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound I L T R 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R to. Lanes 1 1 2 0—_ 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 1— 1 1-- 1 0 LGConfig 1 L TR I L T R L TR 1 L TR olume 1112 810 85 166 672 17 1124 10 18 18 7 15 ane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0.112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 ODuration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations hase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 _ B Left A P I NB .Left Thru P 1 Thru P 1 Right kRight Peds X 1 Peds B Left A P 1 SB Left Thru P I Thru Right P 1 Right Peds X ( Peds NB Right 1 EB Right B Right 1 WB Right reen 6.0 54.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 I11 Red 0.0 2.0 6 7 A A X A A X 30.0 3.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 21 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 343 1770 0.33 0.46 16.9 B TR 1278 3363 .0.96 0.38 47.8 D 45.2 D Westbound L 376 1770 1.01 0.53 79.2 E TR 1610 3501 0.65 0.46 21.8 C 37.0 D Northbound L 340 1770 0.98 0.39 68.8 E TR 571 1784 0.89 0.32 48.0 D 56.2 E Southbound L 305 1770 0.12 0.34 23.7 C T 484 1863 0.78 0.26 42.1 D 35.3 D R 586 1583 0.28 0.37 22.4 C Intersection Delay = 43.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Timberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: ecen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline ZU ' ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Prospect �gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E: Area Type: All other areas ■Date: 11/^17/00 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am <` Year ecen short bkgrd total roject ID: 0153 /W St: Prospect N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 _I I o. Lanes 1 1 2 0 i 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 ► 1 1 1. 1 GConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 L T R 1 Volume 1102 746 372 1353 906 70 1325 357 140 132 320 139 .1 ane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 TOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 1uration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 rB Left A P 1 NB Left A A A Thru P 1 Thru A A Right P I Right A A Peds X 1 Peds X &B Left A A P 1 SB Left A A Thru A P 1 Thru A Right A P 1 Right A Peds X 1 Peds X INB Right 1 EB Right SB Right A 1 WB Right reen 6:0 8.0 38.0 6.0 6.0 26.0 ellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 ' Cycle Length: 100.0 secs W Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary_ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS Eastbound L 274 1770 0.37 .0.46 18.5 B TR 1335 3422 0.92 0.39 40.8 D 39.1 D Westbound L 233 1770 0.70 0.46 31.0 C TR 1369 3509 0.60 0.39 26.2 C 27.0 C Northbound L 359 1770 0.85 0.46 37.7 D TR 677 1737 0.91. 0.39 45.5 D 42.9 D Southbound L 304 1770 0.25 0.43 .20.2 C T 652 1863 0.64 .0.35 29.4 C 25.7 C R 728 1583 0.16 0.46 15.8 B Intersection Delay = 34.8 (sec/veh) Intersection.LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: m pm Intersection: <imberline/Prospect Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Analysis Year: ecent:short bkgrd total Project ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline I ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 MAnalyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Prospect gency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 11/17/00 Jurisd: Forte Collins Period. pm �: Year recen short bkgrd total Project 0153 E/W St: Prospect N/S St: Timberline SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 ko. Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 LGConfig I L .TR 1 L TR 1 L TR ►. L T R i olume 186 814 230 1140 661 40 1259 288 236 164 355 99 1 ane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 _RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ■Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations hase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 B Left A P 1 NB Left A A A Thru P 1 Thru A A P 1 Right A A kRight Peds X I Peds X B Left A P I SB Left A A Thru P 1 Thru A ' Right P 1 Right A Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right tB Right A 1 WB Right reen 6.0 39.0 6.0 4.0 35.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 *k11 Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 0 APPENDIX B 1 1 16 N EAST PROSF' N ' BMEST ' � 1 EAST PROSPECT ROAD a v� v eo Storey ra "Mtb ' m o _ — it81}t��' TRACTA 11 VACANT ZONm E C 0 cc W z J W fG f- D MIDPOINT DRIVE SPRjNG CREEK 91 1 13 e'�v s+o is aafmrdc^ VALET � I Q O X w z J It W m H N BMC WEST MNN(i E ' ! ! -- 1 r ! ' s .* TRACT A t2— Jul-09-01 09:55A NF30/South Street Prospect Prkwy Emt/West Street Prospect Rd. ' Weather. Sunny rime of Day: PM P.04 %MW of rvwawmrra Traffic Operations P.O. Box 580 File Name : ProspectP Wrospectl0-114)0#1 Fort colflns C0.805223ite Code : 000000011 Y SWAM* :10/11f2M Page No : 1 SmIllbound wd N ordimuod Prospa;t a Fad Time bt oug Left Pads 1tr L FO; "�, F0, TTO 6t r rodi M OUS lAdt Tort To- Factor 1.0 I.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 -0" I.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.016.45 66 0 19 2 87 3 191 4 1 199 22 5 50 2 79 3 176 7 0 196 551 17:00 21 0 10 0 31 4 187 7 0 199 13 2 36 0 71 5 222 3 0 230 530 Tow 87 0 29 2 118 7 378 11 1 397 3S 7 106 2 150 8 398 10 0 416 1081 17:15 45 0 20 2 67 17:30 26 0 12 0 38 Grmd rom 158 0 61 4 223 AppcL 56 70. 0.0 27. 1.8 4 +4.6 TOW% 6.8 OR 26 0.2 2 247 2 222 3 0 252 4 3 231 34 21 3 109 2 70 0 146 0 93 3 200 4 202 8 0 211 1 1 208 11 847 18 4 880 90 12 285 2 399 15 800 19 1 935 1.3 9 3 2.0 O.S �WF.`6 3.1 3 0.5 1.8 93' 23 0.1 PIFr-.�11 0.3 4 0.9 0.2 37.8 3.9 12blF;b� 0.5 1 0.1 16.7 0.6 3t 0.8 0.0 35.9 DA Tow ® in 1581 O 81 4as n � Pa 1 IF sm sa OR 4:45 W y� ON i=5:MM. PM +, t ,o laR PWs 12 Sol2 �3 Out In Taal 676 570 2327 Jul-09-01 09:55A Ndr hMouth Street: Prosped Prkwy EaWNest Street Prospect Rd. Weather. Sunny Time of Day: Am P . 03 Traffic Operations P.O. Box 580 File Name : ProspectPW&Prospedio-1 l-0001 Fort collins Co.8052Mft Code : 0000000I Y9 Start Date :1011112WO Pape No :1 rn.u,. R:MeA.1I�iMd Pjospxl P&,%vy >ICIPW pf Pfk" >'fas"1 Soumbamd Wasto od Nor&bmad EadB>a� Rig Ps i App. RigPo App.�ht Pei App. la Ead TimO ht On Lae* TOW bt O°8 Leff TOW ht 0tl8 ! `R Told °� Lan TOW TOW h h h h Fades 1.0 1 1.01 1.0 1 1.01 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.01 1.01 3.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 07:45 4 0 4 0 8 3 211 15 0 231 6 2 17 0 25 18 220 37 0 275 539 08:00 3 3 1 0 7 3 211 17 0 231 7 3 60 0 70 20 277 34 1 332 640 ToW 7 3 5 0 15 8 422 32 0 462 13 5 77 0 95 38 497 71 1 607 1179 08:15 5 1 1 0 7 9 157 22 0 193 3 4 50 0 57 0830 5 3 2 0 10 0 178 12 0 190 2 1 13 0 16 tbatti TOW 17 7 8 0 32 17 757 66 0 940 18 10 140 0 168 Appmh yO 53. 21. 25. 0- p,�� 2.0 90 f 7.9 0.0 'o. 6.0 83 3 0.0 1 9 0 tc ,s' PaF �l 7 PHF;(o ToW % 0.8 0.3 0.4 010 1.5 0.0 6 3.2 0.0 40.6 0.9 0.5 6.8 0.0 8.1 27 195 28 0 240 492 21 147 16 0 184 400 86 829 115 1 1031 2071 8.3 $0 11. 0.1 4.2 0 5.6 .78 0.0 0.8 Out to Tow 32 174 +7 7 e o Rt Twom 4 t� pre M n t-WSJ E V d+voo &30:00 Zm r Umhftd T r 14DI 101 1&1 a +se 1 7-3-01 Out to TOW 10 _Jul-09-01 09:55A ortlUSouth Street: Tm*erfine FaatlWest Street: Prospect ' WoMer. Sunny Time of Day: PM P.02 Traffic Operations P.O. BOX Sao File Name : Timberline3Prosped/0-13.00 Fort colons Co-ON22 Site Code : O0000094 Start Date : 10/122000 Page No : 1 Wd TnDbarlim bound FAstwund End Tam' �8 Leg ' � oug Leg P a it. �Nurd Pad A PP �8 Thr Pad App- hA. h s TOW ht h ToW bt ° Leg s Total ht oOb Leg s ToW TOlal Fss4or 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 16.45 27 72 4 0 103 25 217 111 0 353 33 84 92 0 209 80 155 26 0 261 926 17:00 29 62 12 0 103 17 154 101 0 302 33 91 97 0 221 75 197 26 1 289 915 TOW 36 134 16 0 ZD6 42 401 212 0 655 66 175 199 0 430 155 342 52 1 550 1841 17.15 45 84 11 0 140 1730 43 78 3 0 124 chw TOW 144 296 30 0 470 App * `h . 6 . 6.4 0.0 QNf--. 04 TOW% 3.7 7.6 0.9 0.0 12.0 16 260 104 0 390 31 98 83 0 212 87 170 30 0 287 13 272 97 1 393 16 119 84 1 220 100 183 32 0 315 71 933 413 1 1419 113 392 356 1 $62 342 695 114 1 1152 5.0 65. 29. 01 13. 45. 41. 01 29• 60 9.9 01 23 10 -:�3 1 10 3 �! .y8 7 1i Q�+F.91 1.8 9 6 0.0 36.3 2.9 a 9.1 0.0 22.1 8.8 a 2.9 0.0 29.5 ns Out In TOM z 4T0 104 0 Tftw UR peft $� Tth � �$ OMy00 4: :00 PM Ol12i00 3:90:00 PMUtmhftd r.. r�" � T r► LA A ftM P44s 392 1131 i 1051 002 1873 Out in TOOK 1019 1042 3902 Jul-09-01 09:55A NortMouth Street Tirnberrele F_astlWestStreet Prospect Weather. Sunny Time of Day: AM P.O1 Traffic Operations P.O. Box S80 [=tie Name : Timberlinewrospect10-t -w Fort collins Co.80522 Sje Code : 00000094 SmrtDete : 10✓12raW Page No : 1 Thuberbw ouftotmd > wesmawd Taobeun Norlbbotmd ftospod End Tam Rig TIV °� I e8 Pad M O �s APP• >�8 Thr � Fed APP• Rig 1bd App. lat ht s Taal � TOW M auh s Total 6t O°b s Toml Taal Facaot 1.0 1.0 1.0 I.0 1.0 F 1.0 I i.0 I 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I.0 1.0 1.0 07:45 21 58 23 0 102 6 199 42 0 237 89 71 96 1 257 66 192 22 0 280 $76 09:00 27 75 36 0 138 17 205 57 4 283 77 100 114 1 292 65 239 29 0 333 1046 Taal 48 133 59 0 240 23 394 99 4 520 166 171 210 2 549 131 43l 51 0 613 1922 08:15 29 60 21 0 110 08:30 22 60 15 0 97 (Tmd TOW99 253 95 0 447 A>pmh % 22. 56. 21. 0.0 1 6 3 TOW % 2.9 7.4 18 0.0 13.1 12 167 64 0 243 31 52 72 0 155 79 157 13 0 249 757 6 139 44 0 209 37 64 70 0 171 72 169 19 0 260 737 41 720 207 4 972 234 297 352 2 975 292 757 83 0 1122 3416 42 74. 21. 0.4 26. 31 40. 0.2. 25. 67. 7.4 0.0 12 1 6.1 0.1 283 6.9 8.4 3 0.1 25.6 83 Z 2.4 0.0 32.8 TunbWUM Out in TOW H 0 T%Vtw 4 t� a 1 ft , Q kf'�yytoo 10 Tlh tjAO 0 �s1C O/17J00 7:0.5:00 0fl2�00a:3 WAM � T r► laa A fNft patls M 8a7 2UI 2 ®7 B75 1817 Out to Taint MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 7-10.01 Observer: Michael Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn F—Intersection: Prospect/Specht Point S = straight I = 1pff film Time Begins Northbound: Specht Point Southbound: Total northisouth Eastbound: Prospect Westbound: Prospect Total easttwest Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S I R Total L S R Total 7:15 4 1 1 4 224 14 2 155 395 7:30 7 2 9 265 41 0 19 487 7:45 14 2 16 278 32 1 O� 4 5 2 2 256 566 582 8:00 11 9 40, %rl 20 249 35 2 209 2111,1:1i' 495 515 815 9 11 20 6 20 199 23 222 4 1177 'A81 403 8:30 7 8 15 182 25 3 181 184 391 406 7.30-8:30 41 `0 24 65 F 0 I 0, 0-:1 0 1 65 1 C,19911.1311 1112 jA0'.::1*2191:'1,.:0. .1 839 1 1951 1 PHF 0.81 n1a 0.9 0.82 415 20 8 28 266 15 4:30 11 4 15 1220 12 232 1 316 31T 549 4:45 14 8 :22' 22 266 10 : 0. 2 337 615 -� -13 5:00 17 5 22, 22 187 11 1 302 303 501 5:15 12 3 15 202 9 11 2 313 526 5:30 1 9 1 2 F, 1 291 .202 j 492 1;� 503%. 4.15-5:15 [62 f 0, 87 [:0 0 I 87 I V] 939 148' I 987 1r5:,1112651'0 .1 1270 1 2257 234*i,j, PHF 0.78 n1a 0.88 1 1 0.94 1 (3\ MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 1 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 7-10-01 Observer: Greg Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right tum F—Intersection: Timberline/Midpoint S = straight I -I Time Begins Northbound: Timberline Southbound: Timberline Total northisouth Eastbound: Westbound: Midpoint Total east/west Total All -- L — TS F R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:15 178 80 258 140 398 3 3 7:30 199 65 264 J 175 A 439 7:45 184 85 176 776 445 8:00 168 54 422, 165 3 87 6 6 8:15 152 491• 169 370 0 7 i 7 8:30 1 1183 1 34 1 1184 1 A", 401 ? , :1 1 1 13 11 13 4141 7:115-815 -729"f28*..j 10113 0, Aw I 0...-,l 656 1 1669 1 i 6'. 1: 0 11 11 168 PHF 1 0.94 1 0.93 1 n1a j 0.46 4:15 1155 13 168, 230 398 19 q 19 4:30 1203 19 2... n 251 473 15 15 15 4:45 186 11 197 255 452 15 15 5:00 172 18 1,90 282 472 21 All 21 4935*15 2011 16 211, 298 515 114 14i 14 209 8 F, 1 1266 483 12 i . 2 `12 405, 4:45-5:45 .0 821 1101 1922 0 62 62 PHIF 0.95 0.92 n1a 0.74 Gravity ModePData - Commercial SOUTH (Timberline) EAST (Prospect) WEST (Prospect) NORTH (Timberline) Zone D.U. Zone D.U. Zone D.U. Zone D.U. 95 1299 1/4 74 72 1/4 76 92 1/2 61 145 1/2 96 811 75 551 77 505 31462 415 3/4 97 1034 1/4 76 92 78 540 1/4 63 39 1/2 98 10 1/4 97 345 80 413 1/2 76 183 100 1421 1/2 98 10 11281 379 101 2649 82 524 12102 16 94 974 1/4 111 332 1/2 96 812 1/2112 370 12 113 722 1/4 114 21 Total D.U. 8,685 Total D.U. 1,070 Total D.U. 4,239 Total D.U. 782 Distribution 58.78% Distribution 7.24% Distribution 28.69% Distribution 5.29% _ ' =^' .f �~: Attachment "B" Transportation Impact Study Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet Origin A; Othei (Project Site d", 14SWA n�3-77,7 L 5, Offce/ -usmess,` industnal ©tiler "X311 * P-- L.Lbt UIC pcucsman oesimaxions witnin Lil-W (1.--) miles for schools) of the project boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian 'Level of Service for the facility/corridor linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity, types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and security of the selected route(s). Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2,2001 3 Attachment "A" Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project Name %ratt3E,2CrNC �CEX ?UILDtAJCc Project Location k3e COIZuER T.W,9&P-4 6r A4, b Po (AU T T f Stud Type oY Full: NO Intermediate: � Study Area Boundaries North: ? E c.T South: M, C, PO«J r East: t�1ZOSPcCT PAS Wa West:-r1Mt3GQ.u,tJ6- Study Years Short Range: 2oc)G Long Range: 2M Future Traffic Growth Rate Study Intersections I- All access drives 5•?ieos 5Pm� _ 2'Pr�GT/TM BEIeG/dJ 6F 6'? sR�r ?eas S 3.TMf3t: e,4,uE Ju 1 DPot ur 7. 4. 8. Time Period for Study AMC7:004301 P . 4.00-6:00 Sat Noon: Trip Generation Rates Peg I T i CA TYA c tf 6 D> Trip Adjustment Factors Passby: / N1 � Captive Market: Al Overall Trip Distribution64TTAcffeD\ North °� South� East S o West3o� O Mode Split Assumptions AJIA Committed Roadway Improvements Other Traffic Studies Areas Requiring Special Study Date: J U L Y Traffic Engineer: Local Entity Engineer: J o"% o U FA R IA) '5PR W a Cr-S& FA R,K MA rT 0941C1+ Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 2 APPENDIX A IV. This study assessed the impacts of the Centerpoint Plaza development in the short range (2006) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: The development of Centerpoint Plaza is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, Centerpoint Plaza will generate approximately 969 daily trip ends, 100 morning peak hour trip ends, and 80 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better overall. Acceptable operation at unsignalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service E or better for any approach leg. ' - It is expected that additional traffic signals will not be implemented in the short range future. In the short range future, given full development of Centerpoint Plaza and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably. The short range geometry is shown in Figure 9. Acceptable level of service will be achieved for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes based upon the measures in the multi - modal transportation guidelines. ON ' Appendix F. The minimum level of service for "transit corridor" is B for all categories, except for the visual interest & amenities ' category which is level of service C. The minimum level of service for "other" is C for all categories, therefore, the "transit corridor" level of service will govern. With the assumed future pedestrian ' facilities along future streets, the pedestrian level of service will be acceptable. Bicycle Level of Service Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are no ' destination- areas within 1320 feet of Centerpoint Plaza. The Bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix F, which indicates that the base connectivity is acceptable at level of service C. Transit Level of Service ' Currently, there is one transit route serving the area near Centerpoint Plaza. In the future, transit service will be improved. In the future, Timberline Road will have high frequency transit service (20 minute service) and Prospect Road will have feeder route service (30+ minute service). It is anticipated that the level of service will be in the A category with implementation of the City's t Transit Development Plan. A future transit level of service worksheet is provided in Appendix F. `fie: ca to m III rn ca w U Q --a— -Denotes Lane SHORT RANGE (2006) GEOMETRY M w U aL a 0 0 a N Figure 9 19 TABLE 4 Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Operation Timberline/Prospect NB C C (signal) NB C D 18 TABLE 3 Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Operation Timberline/Prospect 1100 MINOR NB C C Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway NB C D 17 Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6, the key intersections operate in the short range background condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the morning and afternoon peak hours. Using the traffic volumes sho; geometrics, the key intersections condition as indicated in Table analyses are provided in Appendix operate acceptably. Geometric Analysis in in Figure 8 and the recommended operate in the short range total 4. Calculation forms for these D. The key intersections will The short range geometry is shown in Figure 9. The geometry at the Timberline/Prospect intersection was recommended in the "Johnson Farm Property Transportation Impact Study," July 2001. No additional auxiliary lanes are recommended at the Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway, Timberline/Midpoint, and Prospect/Specht Point intersections. Based upon Figure 8-04 in LCUASS, an eastbound right -turn lane is warranted at the Prospect/Specht Point intersection with the existing traffic. However, the south side of Prospect Road is finished with curb/gutter and sidewalk per the previous Fort Collins Street Standards. It is not likely that this turn lane would be added because the street standards changed. Design of the Timberline/Midpoint intersection is subject to the ability to widen Timberline Road to the west. The recommended geometry shown in Figure 9 assumes that this can occur. Appendix E shows a preliminary design of this intersection which provides for a WB- 50 vehicle to negotiate the turns within the curbed area. Final design should be conducted later in the development review process. No auxiliary lanes are required at any of the site access intersections. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of Centerpoint Plaza. There will be five pedestrian destinations within 1320 feet of Centerpoint Plaza. These are: 1) commercial area (Bath Nursery) in the northwest quadrant of the Timberline/Prospect intersection, 2) commercial area (BMC Building Products) north of the site, 3) the future commercial area (Spring Creek Center) north of the site, 4) the commercial area northeast of the site (Prospect East Business Park), and 5) the future residential area (Johnson Farm Property) south of the site. This site is in area types termed "other" and "transit corridor." The level of service determination assumes that future developments will build their streets and adjacent streets in accordance with Fort Collins Standards. This being the case, pedestrian facilities will exist where they currently do not. This is a reasonable assumption. If this does not occur or is not accepted by the City, then acceptable pedestrian level of service cannot be achieved. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in 16 O Ln LO �o v Jo �1 f 1 95m 10 990/850 -� 315/610 N 45/80 -t- 760/1025 195/460 Prospect `D ' m �- 880/1390 o o � 40r30 20/15 760/925 - / 115Q5 J (� f f1140/940 aN W) � 5 �_ I en g n o vZis 1 Imo o C� Ln M 0, N R N V N It T w C f0 � a t a N U Ll N � N O m CD m_ i0 0 M c uoi 7W5 N O am Z N !_ t Z rmi �- 80/100 25J15 J ff or- 515 1 f f �325/115 �_ f o 320fl0 35/15 -y Z N -r 10� 20 m z 1D O C N Q m a> � (p to H Q Q �.— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles SHORT RANGE (2006) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8 15 95n 10 970AM —� 3151610 O co N Ln 0 45M +— 760M 025 r-175/425 Prospect t I a in m n C. f7 Ln V 11401940 —i 3101150 Q W N m U U Q coo Cl) O 00 75145 Lo N v 2 co --o— 60/85 515 451M 30115 r 315770 y 305M —_ uiO�il p z m a� U Q -a*-- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles SHORT RANGE (2006) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC w C 0 a w s U N d m N (0 to � -865J1365 o o 20/15 ' 160/925 40/30 J 75M 19551945 to 0 0 115/25 o o o co N T f0 3 Y M m a. U G1 O N O a. Figure 7 14 �I 18132 Prospect —13r22 1918 22/11 O C] a0 Y C_ O a Y L U N Q U) m �112o `00 Z + �- OM �23l11 O Z + r+— 23111 1ro�Midpoint �� 17/32 � LA 35115 A) (V 210i I I " N .- co p O of Z .n Z m (D .0 IA CA U) U d U ~ Q Q �--- AM/PM SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC U«. N O N O Q_ N 210 N N N Q Cl) I Figure 6 13 Background Traffic Projections Figure 6 shows the short range (2006) background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range future horizon were obtained by contacting Fort Collins Transportation Planning Staff and reviewing various other traffic studies for development proposals in this area. The other development projects considered in this study were Spring Creek Center (north of Centerpoint Plaza), the Johnson Farm Property, and the Spring Creek Farm. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 7 shows the site generated morning and afternoon peak hour traffic assignment of Centerpoint Plaza. Figure 8 shows the short range (2006) total (site plus background) morning and afternoon peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants ' As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Peak hour signal warrants are expected to be t met at the Prospect/Specht Point intersection with the short range background peak hour traffic forecasts. However, with an existing signal at the Prospect/Prospect Parkway intersection, it is not likely that the Prospect/Specht Point intersection would be signalized. There ' are sufficient alternative routes for the northbound left -turn at the Prospect/Specht Point intersection if delays become unacceptable. Sight Distance Analysis Intersection sight distance was evaluated at the key intersections. All streets are level from a traffic engineering perspective. The intersection sight distance of 660 feet can be achieved in both directions at the key intersections. Operation Analysis Capacity analyses were performed at the key intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year 2006 condition. 12 N E t TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 5 11 SITE PLAN 10 Figure 4 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Centerpoint 'Plaza is a commercial development, located east of Timberline Road and south of Midpoint Drive in Fort Collins. Figure 4 shows a site plan of Centerpoint Plaza. The short range analysis (Year 2006) includes development of Centerpoint Plaza and an appropriate increase in background traffic. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected use at this site. Land use codes 814 (Specialty Retail), 710 (Office), and 150 (Warehouse) were used to estimate the daily and peak hour trip generation. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. TABLE 2 Trip Generation Thif. z- r 01 Max,- �.`{�..{�y&,y�-'p. WSW '.e.GsG 4 t c/ Building A 814 Specialty Retail 6.96 KSF 40.671 283 1 1.92 13 1.44 10 1.11 8 1.48 10 Building B 814 Specialty Retail 4.5 KSF 40.67 183 1.92 7 1.44 6 1.11 5 1.48 7 710 Office 7.08 KSF 11.01 78 1.37 10 0.19 1 0.2522E 1.24 9 150 Warehouse 15.42 KSF 4.96 76 0.37 6 0.08 1 0.120.39 6 Building C 814 Specialty Retail 5.25 KSF 40.67 214 1.92 10 1.44 8 1.11 6 1.48 8 710 Office 9.45 KSF 11.01 104 1.37 13 0.19 2 0.25 2 1.24 12 150 Warehouse 6.3 KSF 4.96 31 0.37 2 0.08 1 0.12 1 0.39 2 Total 969 61 29 26 54 Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined ' based upon a simple gravity model and was agreed upon in the scoping meeting. Figure 5 shows the trip distribution used for the following analyses. 9 While the analyses show that acceptable operation occurs at the Timberline/Prospect intersection, observation indicates otherwise. During the peak hours, the northbound queue routinely backs up to/through the Timberline/Midpoint intersection. This intersection allows for right-in/right-out movements. It is approximately 500 feet south of Prospect Road. This length of queue indicates that there is currently inadequate geometry northbound on Timberline Road at Prospect Road. In addition to this, there is a high (>200 vph) eastbound right - turn volume on Prospect Road during the peak hours. Provision of both a northbound right -turn lane and an eastbound right -turn lane would greatly improve the operation of the Timberline/Prospect intersection. Pedestrian Facilities There are no sidewalks along Timberline Road near this site. There are sidewalks along Prospect Road, Specht Point Drive, and Prospect Parkway. Sidewalks do not exist adjacent to undeveloped properties. Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities along Prospect Road. However, the Spring Creek Trail runs parallel to Prospect Road. There are bicycle facilities along Timberline Road. Along the key collector streets, bike lanes are not striped, however the cross section is wide enough to accommodate bike lanes. Transit Facilities ' Route 10 transit route is within 1320 feet of this site. Route 10 operates along Laurel Street from the CSU Transit Center, south on Remington Street, east on Prospect Road, south in the area of Prospect Park East, and then south on Timberline Road. Route 10 provides year- round service on 60 minute headways between 6:20am and 6:50pm. 11 I 1 8 TABLE I Current Peak Hour Operation W. A MEW Timbedine/Prospect (signal) EB D D WB C D NB D E SB C D OVERALL C D Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway (signal) EB B B WB B B NB C D SB C C OVERALL B C Timberline/Midpoint (RT-in/RT-out) WB RT A B Prospect/Specht Point (stop sign) NB LT/RT A A WB LT A A 40170 661/906 /-140/353 -.F— 801 /1267 10/5 102 9831873 86I-�► 8141746 f 131l46 --y N 2301372 -� I I ` g' N to OD M N N N C O p D_ � L O U N LO a N CD 11/62 Midpoint l M co Ln am C v c CO t� N r a E i= -aw- AM/PM N p 17111 LO I� ~ CO �— 672/835 J j � 66/18 11221 t r Prospect 810/861 � N O 85116 N o co R N BALANCED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 9 CS Lo 0)v� cfi Of (7 N O ' 0 f N f 1 (83/114) 88/90 (757/695) 873/683 —•- ' (282/342) 231/341 ' T O (_O LO t1D 1 C 37/70 (41 r70) �— 5561880 (720/933) 62/294 (207/413) f r (Q T ko ko N (7 N CD N M -829/1265 10/5 981/939-�► 131 /48 --y 04 U-3 v V N to co M co N N v v v �11/62 Midpoint w C .Q a U N n ZZ -aw— AM/PM RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC A& N 0 p 17/11 757/847 66/18 115/19 "'*, f r Prospect 8291M — to N O 86l15 — y N l o T T U m a 0 O a Figure 2 5 becoming stuck in the drainage ditch. This is an existing condition and should not be the responsibility of this developer. However, the solution may have an impact upon the placement of buildings and as such, will impact the site plan. Specht Point Drive is northeast of Centerpoint Plaza. It is a north -south street designated as a local street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it is has a two-lane cross section. The Prospect/Specht Point intersection has stop sign control on Specht Point. Prospect Parkway is northeast of Centerpoint Plaza. It is a north -south street designated as a collector street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it is has a two-lane cross section. At Prospect Road, Prospect Parkway has northbound and southbound left -turn lanes and combined northbound and southbound through/right-turn lanes. Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic counts at the key existing intersections are shown in Figure 2. The traffic data for the Timberline/Midpoint and Prospect/Specht Point intersections was collected in July 2001. The traffic data for the Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway intersection was collected in October 2000. The traffic data for the Timberline/Prospect intersection was collected in July 2000 and was taken from the "Spring Creek Farm TIS," August 2000. Values in parentheses at the Timberline/Prospect intersection reflect counts obtained by the City in October 2000. A comparison of these counts indicates abnormalities for some movements. A review of the recent counts at the key intersections near the Timberline/Prospect intersection indicates that averaging the July 2000 count and the October 2000 count would best reflect the current traffic volumes.at the Timberline/Prospect intersection. Therefore, these counts were averaged and balanced between the other key intersections in the area. The balanced recent peak hour traffic is shown in Figure 3. Existing Operation Using the volumes shown in Figure 3, the key intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. The current peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual is also provided in Appendix B. The key intersections operate acceptably during the morning and afternoon peak hours. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better overall. At unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is defined as level of service F for any approach leg in mixed -use districts and level of service E for any approach leg in all other areas. 4 SITE LOCATION A& FORT A 1 COLLINS � V DOWNTOWN AIRPARK Centerpoint Plaza Specht Point Prospect Parkway Prospect Road Midpoin co G c .y E y�Ry H (,9 0,9 O Drake Road SCALE: T'=1000 Figure 1 3 ' II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of Centerpoint Plaza is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. ' Land Use ' Land uses in the area are primarily commercial, industrial, and institutional (Larimer County Detention Center).. These land uses exist east of the site, in an area known as Prospect Park East. The site ' itself is within Prospect Park East. The center of Fort Collins lies to the west of the Centerpoint Plaza site. Roads The primary streets near the Centerpoint Plaza site are Prospect Road, Timberline Road, Midpoint Drive, Specht Point Drive, and Prospect Parkway. Condition diagrams of the key intersections are provided in Appendix A. Prospect Road is north of the Centerpoint Plaza site. It is an east -west street designated as a four -lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a four -lane cross section in the area of the site. At Timberline Road, Prospect Road has two travel lanes in each direction, left -turn lanes, and limited bike facilities. At Specht Point Drive, Prospect Road has two travel lanes in each direction and a westbound left -turn lane. At Prospect Parkway, Prospect Road has two travel lanes in each direction and left -turn lanes. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph. The Timberline/Prospect and Prospect Road/Prospect Parkway intersections have signal control. At the Prospect/Specht Point intersection, Specht Point Drive has stop sign control. Timberline Road is to the west of the Centerpoint Plaza site. It is classified as a six -lane arterial beyond the year 2015 on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Timberline Road has a two-lane cross section near the Centerpoint Plaza site. At Prospect Road, Timberline Road has one travel lane in each direction, left -turn lanes, a southbound right -turn lane, and limited bike facilities. At Midpoint Drive, Timberline Road has one travel lane in each direction and a northbound right -turn lane. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph. Midpoint Drive is adjacent (north) to the Centerpoint Plaza site. It is an east -west street designated as a collector street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it is has a two-lane cross section. The Timberline/Midpoint intersection has right-in/right-out stop sign control on Midpoint Drive. In the scoping meeting, Eric Bracke, Fort Collins Traffic Engineer, indicated that the right -in movement had some existing problems, especially for large vehicles. Entering vehicles (trucks) were either mounting the median island or K ' I. INTRODUCTION This, intermediate transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development known as Centerpoint Plaza. The Centerpoint Plaza is located east of Timberline Road and south of Midpoint Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project engineering consultant (VF Ripley), the Fort Collins Transportation Planning Staff, and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering Staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS), Chapter 4- Transportation Impact Study, January 2, 2001. A traffic impact study base assumptions form is provided in Appendix A. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine daily and peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 5 3. Balanced Recent Peak Hour Traffic >................... 6 4. Site Plan ............................................ 10 5. Trip Distribution .................................... 11 6. Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Traffic .................................... 13 7. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ..................... 14 8. Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Traffic .................................... 15 9. Short Range.(2006) Geometry .......................... 19 APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form/Recent Peak Hour Traffic/Condition Diagrams B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions C Short Range Background Traffic Operation D Short Range Total Traffic Operation E Preliminary Design of Timberline/Midpoint F Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Roads.............................................. 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 4 Existing Operation ................................... 4 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 8 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 8 Transit Facilities ................................... 8 III. Proposed Development ................................. 9 'Trip Generation ...................................... 9 Trip Distribution .................................... 9 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 12 TripAssignment ...................................... 12 SignalWarrants ...................................... 12 Sight Distance Analysis .............................. 12 Operation Analysis ................................... 12 Geometric Analysis ................................... 16 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 16 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 20 Transit Level of Service ............................. 20 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 21 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 7 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 9 3. Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Operation .................................. 17 4. Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Operation .................................. 18 CENTERPOINT PLAZA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO AUGUST 2001 Prepared for: Cobalt Design -Build 1708 E. Lincoln Avenue, #5 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 d,0RE i or, eOO �F G`.S•T.F•� R` Intersection Performance Summary Uppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ration Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay DOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 195 1770 0.62 0.11 48.5 1132 3539 0.83 0.32 38.3 'T R 823 1583 0.81 0.52 26.3 Westbound 618 3433 0.80 0.18 46.7 'L TR 1365 3501 0.87 0.39 34.5 Northbound 'L 549 3433 0.84 0.16 51.6 T 1239 3539 0.43 0.35 25.1 R 902 1583 0.24 0.57 10.9 Southbound L 124 1770 0.38 0.07 46.4 TR 890 3425 0.92 0.26 50.2 Intersection Delay = 37.6 (sec/veh) 4%, D 34.4 C C D C 38.1 D D C 32.6 B D C D 50.0 D Intersection LOS = D ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 ,Matthew J. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Drgency/Co.: .Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 11/17/00 Analysis Time Period: am �, Intersection: Ti erline/Prospect rea Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Fort Collins =Analysis Year: recent hort long bkgrd total project ID: 0153 East/West Street North/South Street Prospect Timberline 1 i 1 1 ISPECT ROAD taper 80storage o 0 0 o o 00000000 zo CL Q Y ' U W 1 � O a I N 0 0 o .( 74' sto ra9e 126 taper O 15 FUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worksheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CSU Campus Transit Center 3.2 14 29 Foothills Fashion Mail 4.2 16 33 Fort Collins High School 1.8 11 17 Downtown Fort Collins 3.6 15 29 Total Travel Time 56 108 1 1.93 Service Level Standards Worksheet ........ ...... Flours of Weekday Service 18 hours 16 hours x Weekday Frequency of Service 15 minutes 20 minutes x Travel Time Factor 2.0 x 2.0 x x Peak Load Factor :5 1.2 :s 1-2---T X 4 of 4 = LOS A -70 m• N.tultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service - connectivity nmvrnan actual propused base connectivity: C N /A S specific connections to priority sites: description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address destination area classification (see text) P. 20 City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan Pedestrian LOS Worksheet M� Project Location Classification: Transit Corridor M A WINE W N, MEE— Commercial in the NW quadrant of the Timberline/ Prosped intersection (Bath Nursery) Commercial Minimum B B B C B Actual C D C C C Proposed B B B 8 B F2 Commercial in the NE quadrant of the Timberline/ Prospect intersection (BMC Products) Commercial Minimum B B B C B Actual C D C C C Proposed B B B B B — F 3 Future Office/Retail in the SE quadrant of the Timberline/ Prospect intersection (Spring Creek Center) Commercial/ Office Minimum B B B C B Actual N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Proposed A A A - 8 A — 4 Office buildings northeast of site (Prospect Park East) Office Minimum B B B C B Actual B C B C C Proposed A A A 8 A Fof -5 Future residential south the site (Johnson Farm Property) Residential Minimum B B B C B Actual N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Proposed B B B C 8 6 Minimum Actual Proposed 7 Minimum Actual Proposed F8 Minimum Actual Proposed 206 A N Propsect Road O o O ` 4 t o_ �i s a CL (D co 0 ,. Midpoint eG� ,Noro NN oR�r FNN O R9y ' SCALE: 1"=50V PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA ' 0 APPENDIX F u 0 V 5-