HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIVERBEND - PDP - 39-01 - DECISION - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISIONCity of Fort Collins
Comm, Lty Planning and Environmenta. mvices
Current Planning
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
TYPE I ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DATE:
PROJECT NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
HEARING OFFICER:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
June 26, 2003
Riverbend Project Development Plan
#39-01
Hooraz, LLC
c/o Vignette Studios
144 North Mason Street, Suite 2
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Hooraz, LLC
1218 West Ash, Suite A
Windsor, CO 80550
Cameron Gloss
Current Planning Director
The Applicant has submitted a Project Development Plan (referred to herein as the
"Project" or the "PDP") proposing 8 dwelling units within three buildings (one 4-plex and
two 2-plexes). The buildings will be two stories, with a maximum of 28 feet in height,
and will contain 3-bedroom units. A single point of access will be provided from
Countryside Drive. The Planning and Zoning Board approved a modification to the
standard requiring building orientation to a connecting walkway on September 5, 2003.
A subdivision plat is part of the PDP application.
SUMMARY OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION: Approval, with Conditions
ZONING DISTRICT: LMN — Low Density Mixed Use Neighborhood District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
1 w 7
bkA
—
e
' vlL,S
Lt93 4
03
.�
W So%
CO_
f N.
Z
ZY
%,ucza-�
T WQXVOCAZZ 1S3• \.1. I-L04JALT,acI.l 4S4 — V`M
R o e L;4,7/6 zz/- 533 Z
4?00
3
-
Riverbend PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
June 26, 2003
Page 5 of 5
Transportation Level of Service Requirements
Section 3.6 of the LUC imposes standards for all modes of transportation. The
Staff Report indicates that the Project is in compliance with Section 3.6 of the
LUC per the submitted Transportation Impact Study.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
A. The Riverbend Project Development Plan is subject to administrative review and
the requirements of the Land Use Code (LUC).
B. The Riverbend Project Development Plan complies with all applicable district
standards of Section 4.4 of the Land Use Code, (LMN) low density mixed use
neighborhood zone district.
C. The Riverbend Project Development Plan complies with all applicable General
Development Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land Use Code.
DECISION
The Riverbend Project Development Plan #39-01, is hereby approved by
the Hearing Officer subject to the following condition:
The Applicant shall revise the Riverbend Subdivision Plat prior to recordation
reflecting the following changes:
1. Denote the language"Utility, Drainage, and Public Access Easement" for Tract A.
2. Eliminate reference to "Site Distance Easement Restrictions".
3. Modify the approval block to reference the Administrative Review process as
opposed to the Planning and Zoning Board.
4. Correct all approval dates to the present year.
Dated this 27th day of June 2003, per authority granted by Sections
1.4.9(E) and 2.1 of the Land Use Code.
Cameron Glos
Current Planning Director
Riverbend PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
June 26, 2003
Page 4 of 5
Parking and Access. The staff report outlines the Project's compliance with
Section 3.2.2 concerning access, circulation and parking. A total of 16 off-street
parking spaces are required where a total of 21 off-street parking spaces are
provided on the subject property. Landscaping covering 8% of the 5-car surface
parking area and driveway circulation area is provided.
There were comments raised at the hearing from a neighboring resident
regarding the existing and proposed fence that lies in between the project and
adjacent lots to the east, relative to design and materials. The applicant
confirmed that an existing six (6) foot high chain link fence will remain and that a
new six (6) foot high wood fence, meeting the City's standards, would be
constructed next to the existing fence, approximately on the eastern property line
of the development site.
The development plan provides for a raised and enhanced pedestrian access
area on both sides of the driveway, thereby satisfying the condition of
Modification approval granted by the Planning and Zoning Board.
Therefore, based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Project complies
with Section 3.2.2 of the LUC.
Site Lighting
Section 3.2.4 requires that exterior lighting will be evaluated to ensure that the
functional and security needs of the development are met in a way that does not
adversely affect the adjacent properties or neighborhood. Based on the
submitted lighting plan, and testimony provided by the applicant at the hearing,
the lighting standards of this section are met. Each of the individual residential
units will have one porch light located near the unit entry. The proposed pole
and fixture illuminating the private driveway has been designed with a fully
shielded light source with a sharp cut-off feature that will minimize up -light, spill
light, glare and unnecessary diffusion on adjacent properties.
Building and Project Compatibility
Section 3.5.1 of the LUC requires that new developments be compatible with the
established character of the area. Pursuant to this section, the proposed building
includes architectural details, building materials, forms, and colors that are similar
or compatible with existing buildings in the area.
Residential Building Standards
As noted, the staff report outlines the modification to this standard granted by the
Planning and Zoning Board.
Riverbend PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
June 26, 2003
Page 3 of 5
FACTS AND FINDINGS
1. Site Context/Background Information
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: FA (Larimer Co.) — Country Gardens Nursery
E: M1 (Larimer Co.) — Single family residential
S: POL — Riverbend Ponds Natural Area
W: C — Timberline Road, Riverbend Ponds Natural Area
The property was annexed into the City as part of the Riverbend Third
Annexation in August 2000.
On September 5, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Board approved a modification
to the standard set forth in Section 3.5.2 (C)(1) — Orientation to a Connecting
Walkway of the Land Use Code. The Board placed a condition on the
modification approval requiring that the enhanced pedestrian access area on
both sides of the driveway be grade separated from the driveway.
2. Compliance with Article 4 and the LMN — Low Density Mixed Use Zoning
District Standards:
The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable requirements of
Article 4 and the LMN zone district. The Staff Report summarizes the PDP's
compliance with these standards and no specific evidence was presented to
contradict or otherwise refute the compliance with Article 4 or the LMN District
Standards. In particular, the proposed two-family and multi -family residential
uses are permitted within the LMN zone district subject to an administrative
review. The proposed 8 dwelling units per acre equals the maximum density
permitted in the zoning district. There was no direct testimony or evidence
presented at the public hearing to contradict the Project's compliance with these
standards.
3. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development
Standards
The project development plan complies with all applicable sections of Article 3 of
the LUC as explained below.
Landscaping and Tree Protection. The staff report outlines the Project's
compliance with Section 3.2.1 concerning landscaping and tree protection and
there was no evidence introduced at the hearing to contradict the Staff Report.
Riverbend PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
June 26, 2003
Page 2 of 5
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Evidence presented to the Hearing Officer established
no controversy or facts to refute that the hearing was
properly posted, legal notices mailed and notice
published.
PUBLIC HEARING
The Hearing Officer, presiding pursuant to the Fort Collins Land Use Code, opened the
hearing at approximately 5:30 p.m. on June 26, 2003 in Conference Rooms C and D,
281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado.
HEARING TESTIMONY, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER EVIDENCE:
The Hearing Officer accepted during the hearing the following evidence: (1) Planning
Department Staff Report; (2) application, plans, maps and other supporting documents
submitted by the applicant and the applicant's representatives to the City of Fort Collins;
and (3) a tape recording of public testimony provided during the hearing. The LUC, the
City's Comprehensive Plan (City Plan), and the formally promulgated policies of the City
are all considered part of the evidence considered by the Hearing Officer.
The following is a list of those who attended the meeting:
From the City:
Steve Olt, City Planner
Susan Joy, Development Review Engineer
From the Applicant:
Terence C. Hoaglund, Vignette Studios
Patricia Kroetch, North Star Design
From the Public:
Sharon Lauffer, 701 Eric Street
Kim Petty, 703 Eric Street
Written Comments:
None.