Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCENTERPOINT PLAZA BUILDING A - MAJOR AMENDMENT - 35-01B - DECISION - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISIONt7o fl- �Yf E�hST Po�ti � �_ r�,'� �• CoLC�i r--S co Centerpoint Plaza PDP Major Amendment Administrative Hearing Findings, Conclusions, and Decision March 30, 2005 Page 4 of 4 At the time of the hearing, two nearby intersections, the Timberline Road - Midpoint Drive and the Timberline Road - East Prospect Road, fail to meet the Level of Service (LOS) requirements; however, the property owner has agreed to pay the developments pro rata share of transportation costs necessary to bring the intersections into compliance. Therefore, the transportation LOS requirements of Section 3.6.4 of the Land Use Code have been met. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS A. The Centerpoint Plaza PDP, Building 'A' Major Amendment is subject to administrative review and the requirements of the Land Use Code (LUC). B. The Center point Plaza PDP, Building 'A' Major Amendment satisfies the development standards of the E zoning district. C. The Center point Plaza PDP, Building 'A' Major Amendment complies with all applicable General Development Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land Use Code. DECISION The Center point Plaza PDP, Building 'A' Major Amendment #35-01 B, is hereby Approved by the Hearing Officer without condition: Dated this 13th day of April 2005, per authority granted by Sections 1.4.9(E) and 2.1 of the Land Use Code. Cameron Gloss "Current Plannin Director Centerpoint Plaza PDP Major Amendment Administrative Hearing Findings, Conclusions, and Decision March 30, 2005 Page 3 of 4 FACTS AND FINDINGS 1. Site Context/Background Information The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: E; approved planned commercial center (Spring Creek Center PUD) S: I, T; existing single family residential property and planned mixed -use (Johnson Property ODP) E: E; existing employment / industrial park (Prospect Park East, Prospect Industrial Park) W: E, I; existing undefined storage and City facility (large storage tanks, Light & Power station) The property was annexed in September, 1973 as part of the East Prospect Street First Annexation. Lot 1 of the Centerpoint Plaza Subdivision was previously platted and approved in September 2003. Building A (Phase 1) was approved as a 1-story building containing 7,062 square feet of leasable floor area. 2. Compliance with Article 4 and the E-Employment Zoning District Standards: Offices, medical clinics, and print shop, bars are permitted uses within the E district subject to administrative review. This proposal complies with the purpose of the E District as it is a primary workplace that includes office, medical clinic, and print shop uses in a planned business park. The three story building height is less than the four story maximum within the E- Employment district. The resulting building height under this amended plan is 39'-11" where 23'-6" was approved on the original plan. 3. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development Standards The project development plan complies with all applicable sections of Article 3 of the Land Use Code. No evidence was presented to contradict the statements and conclusions of the staff report concerning compliance or to otherwise refute the compliance with the Article 3 Standards. Centerpoint Plaza PDP Major Amendment Administrative Hearing Findings, Conclusions, and Decision March 30, 2005 Page 2 of 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Evidence presented to the Hearing Officer established no controversy or facts to refute that the hearing was properly posted, legal notices mailed and notice published. PUBLIC HEARING The Hearing Officer, presiding pursuant to the Fort Collins Land Use Code, opened the hearing at approximately 2:00 p.m. on March 30, 2005 in Conference Room A at 281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. HEARING TESTIMONY, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER EVIDENCE: The Hearing Officer accepted during the hearing the following evidence: (1) Planning Department Staff Report; (2) application, plans, maps and other supporting documents submitted by the applicant and the applicant's representatives to the City of Fort Collins; and (3) a tape recording of the hearing. The LUC, the City's Comprehensive Plan (City Plan), and the formally promulgated policies of the City are all considered part of the evidence considered by the Hearing Officer. The following is a list of those who attended the meeting: From the City: Steve Olt, City Planner Sheri Wamhoff, City Development Review Engineering Manager From the Applicant: Don Brookshire, Eastpoint Studio Michele White, Nolte Associates From the Public: None Written Comments: None City of Fort Collins Commuiuty Planning and Environmental services Current Planning CITY OF FORT COLLINS ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER TYPE I ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DATE PROJECT NAME: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: OWNER: HEARING OFFICER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: March 30, 2005 Centerpoint Plaza PDP, Building 'A' Major Amendment #35-01 B Eastpoint Studios c/o Don Brookshire 3207 Kittery Court Fort Collins, CO. 80526 Frazier & Company 141 South College Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Cameron Gloss Current Planning Director This is a request for an increase in the building height, from 1 story to 3 stories, and an increase in the amount of leasable floor area, from 7,062 square feet to 21,822 square feet, in a new mixed -use building on a portion of Lot 1 of the Center point Plaza Project Development Plan (referred to at the PDP or the "Project"). The proposed land uses include professional offices, print shops and medical clinics. SUMMARY OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION: Approval, with conditions ZONING DISTRICT: E — Employment STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020