HomeMy WebLinkAboutPREISS SUBDIVISION (619 WHEDBEE ST.), REPLAT - PDP - 16-02 - DECISION - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISIONn
a
`__ - - -
Preiss Subdivision
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
May 29, 2002
Page 5 of 5
The subdivision does not trigger alley improvements, i.e.-relocation of existing
encroachments, utility improvements and paving, because a replat is not defined
as "development'.
Although the Hearing Officer finds that many of the concerns raised by
neighboring residents of the subdivision are insightful, the development
application must be judged under the existing applicable regulations of the City of
Fort Collins Land Use Code. These regulations provide sufficient specificity to
determine that the Applicant or Owner has designed the subdivision in
conformance with the applicable standards of Article 3. There is no authority for
the Hearing Officer to mandate that the Applicant or Owner exceed the minimum
requirements of the Land Use Code when designing the subdivision, or to project
impacts of future development not part of this application.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
A. The Preiss Subdivision is subject to administrative review and the requirements
of the Land Use Code (LUC).
B. The Preiss Subdivision satisfies the development standards of the N-C-M zoning
district.
C. The Preiss Subdivision complies with all applicable General Development
Standards, including the Plat Standards, contained in Article 3 of the Land Use
Code.
DECISION
The Preiss Subdivision, #16-02, is hereby approved by the Hearing Officer without
condition.
Dated this 11th day of June 2002, per authority granted
1.4.9(E) and 2.1 of the Land Use Code. �, /
Cameron Glos6
Current PlanKing Director
Preiss Subdivision
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
May 29, 2002
Page 4 of 5
associated with a potential, future conversion of the existing, historic "carriage"
house to a dwelling unit. The applicant acknowledged that no changes are being
proposed to the carriage house at this time.
There was public testimony presented related to economic impacts, either as a
benefit to the property owner or the potential to devalue nearby properties, as a
result of the subdivision. Some of the comments indicate a perception that
neighboring property values are enhanced if the subdivision does not occur.
Several speakers cited concerns about additional perceived impacts along the
alley. It was noted that existing alley encroachments effectively narrow the alley
to a width considerably less than the 20 feet -wide platted alley right-of-way, and
that the alley was not designed to function as a street.
Concerns were expressed about the potential impacts of this subdivision to the
historic character of the neighborhood and existing carriage house.
An issue raised by one neighborhood resident related specifically to owner
versus rental occupancy of dwellings on the site. She expressed that occupancy
of the carriage house is not objectionable if the owner continues to reside in the
"front house". If the subdivision does not occur and the owner resides in the front
house, the perception is that there will be greater likelihood that the property will
be well maintained and activities in the carriage house monitored.
Issues related to future, potential impacts raised during the public hearing fall
outside the criteria used by the Hearing Officer to evaluate the subdivision.
There was no evidence introduced at the hearing to contradict the Staff Report;
therefore, the Hearing Officer finds that the Subdivision is in conformance with
the applicable requirements found in Article 4 of the Land Use Code.
3. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development
Standards
A. Section 3.3.1 [B] — Lots
The proposed lots comply with the minimum lot area requirement of 5,000 square
feet for single family lots in the N-C-M, Neighborhood Conservation — Medium
Density zone district. Each lot has vehicular access to a public street or alley.
B. Section 3.3.1 [C] (1) - Public Sites, Reservations, and Dedications
The plat indicates proper dedications for pedestrian and utility easements as
needed to serve both lots.
Preiss Subdivision
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
May 29, 2002
Page 3 of 5
Written Comments:
None
FACTS AND FINDINGS
1. Site Context
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: N-C-M; Existing Residential
S: N-C-M; Existing Residential
E: N-C-M; Existing Residential
W: N-C-M; Existing Residential
The property was platted as Lot 4, Block 156 of the original town plat.
2. Compliance with Article 4 and the N-C-M Zoning District Standards:
The plat complies with the standards found under Article Four of the Land Use
Code. The applicant's request to replat the 10,060 square foot lot, in order to
create two new lots of 5,030 square feet, complies with the following standards:
A. Section 4.7(D)(1) — Land Use Standards
The two new lots comply with the minimum lot area requirement of 5,000 square
feet for single family lots in the N-C-M, Neighborhood Conservation — Medium
Density zone district.
B. Section 4.7(E)(1)(2)(3)(4) — Dimensional Standards
(1) Both lots exceed the required minimum of 40 feet of street/alley frontage.
Lot One has 53 feet of frontage along Whedbee Street and Lot Two has
53 feet of frontage along the alley. Both the street and alley are shown as
previously dedicated public rights -of -way.
(2) Front, side and rear setbacks will be reviewed as per the Basic
Development Review process for a building permit.
While there was no direct testimony or evidence presented at the public hearing
to contradict compliance with the land use and dimensional standards prescribed
within the zoning district, public testimony identified perceived negative impacts
Preiss Subdivision
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
May 29, 2002
Page 2 of 5
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Evidence presented to the Hearing Officer established
no controversy or facts to refute that the hearing was
properly posted, legal notices mailed and notice
published. Note: legal notice identified this
development application as the "619 Whedbee
Replat".
The Hearing Officer, presiding pursuant to the Fort Collins Land Use Code, opened the
hearing at approximately 4:00 p.m. on May 29, 2002 in Conference Room A at 281
North College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado.
HEARING TESTIMONY, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER EVIDENCE:
The Hearing Officer accepted during the hearing the following evidence: (1) Planning
Department Staff Report; (2) application, plans, maps and other supporting documents
submitted by the applicant and the applicant's representatives to the City of Fort Collins;
(3) a sign up sheet of persons attending the hearing; and (4) a tape recording of
testimony provided during the hearing. The LUC, the City's Comprehensive Plan (City
Plan), and the formally promulgated policies of the City are all considered part of the
evidence considered by the Hearing Officer.
The following is a list of those who attended the meeting:
From the City:
Bob Barkeen, City Planner
Katie Moore, Engineer
From the Applicant:
Steve Preiss
From the Public:
Randall and Jo Luttrell, 630 Peterson Street
Madeline Weisz, 605 Peterson Street
Bonnie Lea -Lee Kunkler, 613 Whedbee Street
Melissa and Tripp Hughes, 632 Peterson Street
Lue Rosenoff, 610 Whedbee Street
Lauren McMilki
Doug and Kristi Buffington, 628 Peterson Street
City of Fort Collins
Comm. _ty Planning and Environmental-ervices
Current Planning
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
TYPE I ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DATE:
PROJECT NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
OWNER:
APPLICANT:
HEARING OFFICER:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
May 29, 2002
Preiss Subdivision
#16-02
Steve Preiss
619 Whedbee Street
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Ayers Associates
3665 JFK Parkway, Bldg. 2, Suite 200
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Cameron Gloss
Current Planning Director
The Applicant has submitted a request to replat Lot 4, Block 156, City of Fort Collins
Subdivision into two lots. The original lot contains 10,060 square feet and features one
single family dwelling facing Whedbee Street and one carriage house at the rear of the
lot. The request evenly splits the property into two lots, each of 5,030 square feet. As a
result of this replat, the existing single family house and the carriage house would be on
separate lots. The site is located along the west side of Whedbee Street, between
Myrtle and Laurel Streets.
SUMMARY OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION: Approval
ZONING DISTRICT: N-C-M, Neighborhood Conservation — Medium Density
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020