HomeMy WebLinkAboutDISCOUNT TIRE AT FOSSIL CREEK - PDP/FDP - 26-02 - DECISION - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION-
T> _ I
JLII�
l Ken r(11,
out 5
'Z� I N • rGl (k
�ev-{- �o/�%h
Sa o iz- LLE
DE JY
Q—..
Z$ ( 1V , Co tte-G -
v�Q
y
- .✓ e ;,hsoc
Ip
r
022� Sc6lk—l-� 4vti
s4Z 8S2S5
LAM
c/
ZU l
eva c6 00
�z�SS 1,C /` ��✓ C /J/C
/-� Ce7l�ivS Cv �dS 2��
t rra c n
5ai3 toss,' 1 2,c(e Dr, Fy, C016hrn,s--7-AGU s�na�
e
5 os _
S-
L vL
EFP2a�v
7 So /�'t S % l�av ��,E2
Co �3a2-
Discount Tire PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
July 2, 2003
Page 7 of 7
DECISION
The Discount Tire Project Development Plan #26-02, is hereby approved by the
Hearing Officer subject to the following conditions:
1. The City shall vacate portions of South College Avenue (SH 287) and Fossil Creek
Parkway, as described on the Vacation Request Exhibit dated June 20, 2003.
2. The Applicant shall include on the Final Plan, the hours of operation of 8:30 a.m. to
5:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday.
Dated this 14th day of July 2003, per authority granted by Sections
1.4.9(E) and 2.1 of the Land Use Code.
Cameron Globs
Current Planning Director
Discount Tire PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
July 2, 2003
Page 6 of 7
3.5.3(B)(2). The Planning and Zoning Board found, in a public hearing held on
August 15, 2002, pursuant to the criteria of Section 2.8.2, that the proposed
building could be setback further from Fossil Creek Parkway than the maximum
15 feet permitted.
In addition to the neighborhood compatibility issues that were raised, testimony
provided at the hearing questioned whether the standards for drainage, wildlife
habitat, and water quality protection were being met by the PDP. It was an
expressed fear of the opponents that the Project will cause environmental
damage to the adjacent Fossil Creek and poses a stormwater safety issue for the
surrounding area. As outlined in the Applicant's Final Drainage and Erosion
Control Report and corroborated by the Applicant's Engineer and the City staff at
the hearing, runoff water will be detained on the property and will release at a
two-year historic rate. The projected level of drainage will release water at the
same rate as in its present undeveloped condition. In addition to the quantity of
water, the detention design will ensure the quality of water entering into Fossil
Creek. An Ecological Characterization Study, including a field survey, was
conducted to identify any unique or sensitive natural resource features on -site or
impacted by the Development. Large trees on the south end of the property will
be maintained as part of the PDP. Project impacts to natural habitat will be
mitigated by a 100 buffer area between the creek and the proposed facilities and
one quarter mile buffer from an existing Redtail Hawk's nest located to the
southwest consistent with requirements found in the LUC. The Staff Report
summarizes the PDP's compliance with these standards and there was no
evidence submitted at the hearing to contradict the statements and conclusion of
the Staff Report concerning compliance or to otherwise refute compliance with
the Article 3 Standards.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
A. The Discount Tire Project Development Plan is subject to administrative review
and the requirements of the Land Use Code (LUC).
B. The Discount Tire Project Development Plan complies with all applicable district
standards of Section 4.17 of the Land Use Code, (C) Commercial zone district.
C. The Discount Tire Project Development Plan complies with all applicable General
Development Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land Use Code, except
where a modification was previously granted by the Planning and Zoning Board.
Discount Tire PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
July 2, 2003
Page 5 of 7
the City staff, supports a finding of compliance with the Transportation Level of
Service Requirements
Requests were made to the Hearing Officer by area residents to consider the
impacts on the quality of life that might arise due to the existence of a
neighboring tire store near a residential area. Admittedly, many, if not most,
residential owners would not desire a new use of this type within the immediate
vicinity of their homes. However, the subject property has long been planned
and zoned for a commercial use, such as contemplated by the PDP and, in fact,
the subject property was available for other commercial uses with potentially
greater intensity than that proposed by the PDP. The Hearing Officer both
sympathizes with the neighboring property owners and finds the Applicant/Owner
has attempted, through building placement and orientation near the corner of S.
College Avenue (a heavily traveled State highway), and landscape treatments, to
mitigate impacts between the lawfully permitted use of the subject property and
the neighboring residences.
Although the Hearing Officer finds that some of the concerns raised by the
opponents of the PDP were insightful and might potentially improve acceptance
of the PDP by the neighboring landowners, the PDP must be judged under the
existing applicable regulations of the Fort Collins Land Use Code. These
regulations provide sufficient specificity to determine that the Applicant and
Owner have designed the PDP in conformance with the applicable regulations
and there is no authority for the Hearing Officer to mandate that the Applicant or
Owner exceed the minimum requirements of the Land Use Code, and other
applicable regulations, in designing the development
2. Compliance with Article 4 and the C — Commercial Zoning District
Standards:
The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable requirements of
Article 4 and the C zone district. The Staff Report summarizes the PDP's
compliance with these standards. In particular, the proposed tire store, which is
considered a "minor vehicle repair, servicing and maintenance" use is permitted
within the C zone district subject to an administrative review. See Section
4.17(2)(c) of the LUC. The Project is also in conformance with Section 4.17(D),
land use standards relating to building height, calling for buildings to be four
stories or less.
3. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development
Standards
The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable sections of Article 3 of
the LUC except the Orientation to Build -To Lines Standard found in Section
Discount Tire PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
July 2, 2003
Page 4 of 7
Applicant and Owner in the property's design and operational issues. The
Applicant and Owner acknowledged that they had taken steps to adjust the
design of the proposed development plan to help mitigate impacts on the
neighboring residential uses. Unfortunately, the adjustments did not, to those
persons in attendance, address the potential issues and concerns.
A common issue repeatedly raised by many opponents involved adverse noise
impacts. It was an expressed fear of the opponents that the noise generated
from air impact wrenches and other aspects of the operation would create
unreasonable and significant adverse impact to the neighborhood. As part of the
Applicant's submittal, a noise study was submitted that identified the noise
impacts associated with the prototype building proposed for this Development.
No site specific noise study was completed. The noise diagram developed for
the prototype building, when transposed on the site plan developed for the
subject property, shows that the noise levels above 59 (dB(A)), described by the
applicant as the level of a "speaking voice", will fall within the subject property.
The building has been sited with tire bays opening to the south, oriented away
from the closest residences. While neighborhood residents have pointed out that
the study prepared by the applicant did not take into account site topography and
the building's close proximity to Fossil Creek, the weight of the evidence
suggests that noise generated by the Development are well within the maximum
levels prescribed under the City Code. Section 20-23 of the City Code specifies
that the maximum noise generated will be no more than 55 dB(A) from 7:00 am
to 8:00 pm. Pursuant to Section 20-24, the noise levels shall be measured at or
within the property boundary of the impacted land use. With the property
boundary of the closest residence more than 200 feet away from the 59 dB(A)
level identified on the applicant's noise study, the Hearing Officer is convinced
that the applicable noise standard will be met.
Adverse traffic conditions in the immediate area of S. College and Fossil Creek
Parkway were another main issue raised by many opponents of the
Development. The opponents specifically expressed concern about the amount
of additional traffic generated by the Development and the potential for users to
unsuccessfully attempt to cut through adjacent dead-end streets and force to use
them as a "turn -around". Based on the Applicant's Transportation Impact Study
(TIS) the evidence presented on the issue of traffic impacts affecting Fossil
Creek Parkway and "turn around" traffic within the neighborhood, the Hearing
Officer is convinced that vehicular conflicts will not increase in any significant
manner by the traffic generated by the Project. Traffic projections provided in the
applicant's Transportation Impact Study are based on actual traffic counts from
the same prototype store. The Hearing Officer acknowledges and appreciates
that residents have provided careful thought in the framing of their concerns;
however, the weight of evidence presented by the Applicant and corroborated by
Discount Tire PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
July 2, 2003
Page 3 of 7
FACTS AND FINDINGS
1. Compatibility with Surrounding Uses
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
W: C — College Avenue, Existing Cameron Park office development,
POL — Existing City owned Redtail Grove Natural Area,
N: C — Fossil Creek Parkway, vacant Parcel, existing retail shopping center,
NE: Residential (R) Zone in Larimer County — Fossil Creek Parkway, existing
single family detached portion of the Fossil Creek Meadows
Neighborhood,
E: Residential (R) Zone in Larimer County — Existing single family attached
portion of the Fossil Creek Meadows Neighborhood, Fossil Creek,
neighborhood park,
S: Residential (R) Zone in Larimer County — Existing neighborhood,
SW: C — College Aveune,
POL — Existing City owned Redtail Grove Natural Area.
The property was annexed as part of the Fossil Creek Third Annexation in April
of 1985.
The evidence established that the owner of the subject property was originally
entitled by the C Commercial zone district to the use of the site exclusively for
commercial development, including the proposed tire store use. A commercial
zone designation has been assigned to this property since 1977, when the area
was first developed in Larimer County. This commercial zoning. predates much,
if not all, of the residential development within the immediately surrounding area.
When the property was annexed into the City of Fort Collins in 1985, the C-
Commercial designation was assigned consistent with the previous Larimer
County zoning. As a result, residential owners understood, or should be charged
with some level of knowledge, that the subject property would be used for
commercial purposes.
Testimony was offered at the hearing by neighboring residential landowners
concerning the anticipated or feared impacts of the proposed development and
its design upon the residential land uses of the Fossil Creek Meadows
Subdivision. These impacts included increased noise, traffic, access, decrease in
residential property values, and negative impacts to water quality and wildlife
habitat.
Evidence further established that two neighborhood meetings and other
opportunities were made available for the opponents of the project to engage the
Discount Tire PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
July 2, 2003
Page 2 of 7
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Evidence presented to the Hearing Officer established
no controversy or facts to refute that the hearing was
properly posted, legal notices mailed and notice
published.
PUBLIC HEARING
The Hearing Officer, presiding pursuant to the Fort Collins Land Use Code, opened the
hearing at approximately 5:30 p.m. on July 2, 2003 in the Conference Rooms C and D,
281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado.
HEARING TESTIMONY, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER EVIDENCE:
The Hearing Officer accepted during the hearing the following evidence: (1) Planning
Department Staff Report; (2) application, plans, maps and other supporting documents
submitted by the applicant and the applicant's representatives to the City of Fort Collins;
and (3) a tape recording of public testimony provided during the hearing. The LUC, the
City's Comprehensive Plan (City Plan), and the formally promulgated policies of the City
are all considered part of the evidence considered by the Hearing Officer.
The following is a list of those who attended the meeting:
From the City:
Troy Jones, City Planner
Katie Moore, Development Review Engineer
From the Applicant:
Paul Heffron, Property Owner
David Parker, Project Architect
Jack Blake, Consulting Engineer
From the Public:
Bonnie McCormick, 5213 Fossil Ridge Drive
Cindy South, 5201 Fossil Ridge Drive
Chris and Katie Corman, 5212 Fossil Ridge Drive
Gene and Molly Fiechtl, 5430 Fossil Court North
Sandra Holt, 5518 Fossil Ridge Drive East
Written Comments:
None
Comn. pity Planning and Environment. )ervices
Current Planning
Citv of Fort Collins
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DATE: July 2, 2003
PROJECT NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
HEARING OFFICER:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Discount Tire Project Development Plan
#26-02
Louise Herbert
V.F. Ripley & Associates
401 West Mountain Avenue, Suite 201
Fort Collins, CO 80521-2604
Discount Tire Company
14361 N. Scottsdale Rd.
Scottsdale, AZ
Cameron Gloss
Current Planning Director
The Applicant has submitted a Project Development Plan (referred to herein as the
"Project" or the "PDP") proposing a one-story, 8,480 sq.ft. tire store, located at the
southeast corner of South College Avenue and Fossil Creek Parkway. The project
would be accessed from Fossil Creek Parkway, in alignment with Snead Drive.
SUMMARY OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION: Conditional Approval
ZONING DISTRICT: C — Commercial District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditional Approval
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020