Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE LOFTS AT PARK CENTRAL - PDP - 28-02A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYto N E U E N J v 5/2 -.0— 5/2 4/2 0/1 1/5 — � Prospect 3/13 (10 � � N T T SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N Ca N pp.W N o mQ 0- --a— AM/PM N 1/2 NOM � r 2 Oa Z Figure 7 13 ITrip Assignment ' Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 7 shows the site ' generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 8 shows the total (site plus background) short range peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based upon the short range peak hour traffic forecasts, no signal warrants will be met for the existing stop sign ' controlled intersections. Operation Analysis Capacity analyses were performed at the Prospect/Lemay, Prospect/ Park East Access, and Prospect/Luke/F.C. Club Access intersections. The ' operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis future, reflecting a year 2005 condition. ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6 and the existing geometrics, the key intersections operate in the short range (2005) background traffic future as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms ' for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably. ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8 and the existing geometrics, the key intersections operate in the short range (2005) total traffic future as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The key intersections will ' operate acceptably. The short range (2005) geometry is shown in Figure 9. According to City of Fort Collins street standards, left -turn auxiliary lanes are required on all arterial streets, however no left - turn auxiliary lanes are shown at the Prospect/Park East Access and Prospect/Luke/F.C. Club Access intersections. With the current physical constraints on Prospect Road, left -turn auxiliary lanes cannot be ' striped without widening Prospect Road. If Prospect Road were widened, it would likely be a capital improvement project by the City of Fort Collins, as mentioned earlier in this report. Pedestrian Level of Service ' Contact was made with Fort Collins Transportation Planning staff regarding pedestrian and bicycle level of service analysis. Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of Park Central TownhQmes. There will be seven pedestrian destinations within a ' 12 A& N � d N � C V N m E U u',va ) N J J co O o o 5/5135/115 o nI + 550/690 =I 165/210 N`O Ln - 810/970 zI J i l 20/30 ` � Iz `I� + l - 8101995 25/20 /— 1551145 Prospect 30/5 �\ n n 5/5 D 585/660 -a- 795/955 N -► 825/1000 -i 75/120 w 0 Ln 45/75 o O R N Z N 25/20 ,r O o N Z N CAD L N � � y Qw "a')3 o -Le 8 U � U aaa o a LL -�*— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles SHORT RANGE (2005) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 11 cv E N J 0 LO N 30% Prospect 0 N TRIP DISTRIBUTION Site N 20% -da---lm� Figure 5 10 EAST PROSPECT ROAD :IT Z az Prospect Park East LLIJ-1 I- _LLIJ-U-1 -LL BUILDING 3 LJ :31 'Llf I I I z i ; 1 ) 1 BUILDING 51 e LUINQ4 xv SCALE: 1"=100' A& N Fort Collins Club SITE PLAN 9 Figure 4 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Park Central Townhomes is a proposed residential development, located east of Lemay Avenue and south of Prospect Road in Fort Collins. Figure 4 shows a site plan of Park Central Townhomes. The short range ' analysis (Year 2005) includes development of Park Central Townhomes and an appropriate increase in background traffic. Since this is an intermediate level transportation impact study, a long range analysis is not required. The site plan shows two existing public accesses to Park Central Townhomes via the Prospect/Park East Access and Prospect/Luke/F.C. Club Access intersections. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. Trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. Trip generation equations were used to calculate the estimates shown in Table 2. TABLE 2 Trip Generation x ��'XLM`f., �`rt�� "?� ��� �� �� � •kf `� ���ti �. i "Y,Y j� 'i� "hi`fy�r+' 1- �_��.���.-� ` g-�"ci Y'z v--,yF ,5y a� ..i�,"�C�+w.' -^o a'T'fis. •` rti S. ��y,^,�'ax AK :c a.� (+.*`;'_`nj 4rais..c Ai, •*...x.,a.. tr�iir? nF �... 230 Townhomes 34 D.U. 1 7.65 260 10.11 1 4 0.53 18 0.50 17 0.24 8 Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for Park Central Townhomes based upon the distribution of the existing and future trip productions for these types of land uses. Figure 5 shows the trip distributions used for the short range (2005) analysis future. Background Traffic Projections Figure 6 shows the short range (2005) background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range future horizon were obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP, the Pinnacle Townhomes Transportation Impact Study, and contacting Fort Collins Transportation Planning,staff. 8 Transit Facilities Route 5 is within 1320 feet of this site. Route 5 operates on Lemay Avenue and provides year-round service on 60 minute headways from approximately 6:30am to approximately 7:00pm. TABLE I Current Peak Hour Operation Prospect/Lemay (signal) EB C C WB C C NB C C SB C C OVERALL C C Prospect/Park East Access (stop sign) NB LT/T D E NB RT A A NB APPROACH B C SB LTfr/RT B C EB LT A B WB LT A A Prospect/Luke/F.C. Club Access (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT D C SB LT/T/RT C D EB LT A B WB LT A B 7 N d y O1 C U N U N U) U Q co O co M N co N E J N M 126/109 +-- 517/642 155/198 O N N J 14111133 1 � Prospect � 29/4 542/617 — N T Ln 737/898 —► 67/111 m rn 43/69 N O T Cl) T � 618 v o M 764/904 Ln o N ---18/29 t r Ln 0 T Ln U N y CaQW y O U aaQ f— AM/PM ADJUSTED/BALANCED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC pw, `— 2/6 760/930 r— 22/21 1/3 --)� 1 T r 7671940 —► e o r 24C20 N Q T Figure 3 N %\ R E 0 J 127/109 — 519/648 - 156/200 rn N 00 O N O N 1411133 1 f r Prospect 2914 536/539 Ln , ,-t 756/868 — 67/111 43/69 m Cl Cq N O e- 6/8 �— 811 /895 18/29 U) o o � N O Ln JO N i 1/3 —� 748/1064 — 24/20 — y A& N Y 3 J` 216 f— 714/892 22/21 U N H C y CL W (L)i U 2 (D O� U L.0 U Q aaQ 0 LL + AM/PM RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 5 for a parkway, it would appear that this parkway could be eliminated in order to provide a center left -turn lane on Prospect Road. The City of Fort Collins should weigh the need for the parkway against better traffic operation, a safer traffic environment (left -turn lanes), and the potential of providing bike lanes if there is enough width available. This judgment is the responsibility of the City of Fort ' Collins. Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic volumes at the Prospect/Lemay, Prospect/ ' Park East Access, and Prospect/Luke/F.C. Club Access intersections are shown in Figure 2. The counts at the Prospect/Lemay intersection were obtained in February 2002. The counts at the Prospect/Park East Access ' and Prospect/Luke/F.C. Club Access intersections were obtained in April 2002. Raw count data is provided in Appendix B. Since the counts were performed on different days, the traffic volumes were averaged and balanced between the intersections, and is shown in Figure 3. Existing Operation ' The key intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 3, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity ' Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix C. The key intersections operate acceptably during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Park Central Townhomes is in an area termed "mixed -use district." In ' mixed -use districts, acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service E or better. At unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at ' level of service F for any approach leg for an arterial/local intersection. Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalks exist along Lemay Avenue and Prospect Road near and ' adjacent to the Park Central Townhomes site. Bicycle Facilities There are bicycle facilities along Lemay Avenue. There are no ' bike lanes on Prospect Road, between Shields Street and Interstate 25. However, the Spring Creek Bicycle/Pedestrian Trial is just south of the site. This is an east -west trail, which exists from west of ' Rolland Moore Park, to east of Timberline Road (Cattail Chorus Natural Area). 4 Prospect SITE LOCATION E J Park Central Townhomes Stuart SCALE: 1"=1000' N Figure 1 3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of Park Central Townhomes is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily commercial, office, institutional, and residential. Prospect Park East commercial center is adjacent to the site to the west. The Fort Collins Club is adjacent to the site to the east. Riffenburgh Elementary School is located to the southeast of Park Central Townhomes. Residential uses exist throughout the area. The center of Fort Collins lies to the west of Park Central Townhomes. Streets The primary streets near the Park Central Townhomes site are Lemay Avenue and Prospect Road. Lemay Avenue is to the west of Park Central Townhomes. It is a north -south street designated as a four -lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. In this area, Lemay Avenue currently has a four -lane cross section. At the Prospect/Lemay intersection, Lemay Avenue has northbound and southbound left -turn lanes and right -turn lanes, and two through lanes in each direction. Lemay Avenue is posted at 40 mph. Prospect Road is north of Park Central Townhomes. It is an east - west street designated as a four -lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. In this area, Prospect Road currently has a four - lane cross section. Prospect Road is posted at 35 mph. At the Prospect/ Lemay intersection, Prospect Road has eastbound and southbound left -turn lanes, two through lanes in each direction, and a westbound right -turn lane. At the Prospect/Park East Access intersection, Prospect Road has an eastbound right -turn lane as the only auxiliary lane. Currently, there are .no additional auxiliary lanes at either the Prospect/Park East Access intersection or the Prospect/Luke/F.C. Club Access intersection. According to City of Fort Collins street standards, left -turn auxiliary lanes are required on all arterial streets. However, due to physical constraints, left -turn auxiliary lanes cannot be striped on Prospect Road without widening Prospect Road. The City of Fort Collins refers to this segment of Prospect Road as a substandard arterial street. As such, Prospect Road may never meet the arterial street standards. From casual observation of Prospect Road west of Lemay Avenue, this conclusion can easily be reached. However, east of Lemay Avenue, there is the ability to widen Prospect Road without any or significant acquisition of right-of-way. There is a parkway on the north side of Prospect Road between the existing curb/gutter and the sidewalk. While the arterial street standards call 2 I. INTRODUCTION ' This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Park Central Townhomes residential development. Park Central Townhomes is ' located east of South Lemay Avenue and south of Prospect Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. ' During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultant (VF Ripley Associates), the Fort Collins Transportation Planning Staff, and the Fort Collins Traffic ' Engineering Staff. The Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions form is provided in Appendix A. This intermediate transportation impact study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines. The study involved the ' following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service- analyses on key ' - intersections; Analyze signal warrants; Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent (2002) Peak Hour Traffic ...................... 5 3. Balanced Recent (2002) Peak Hour Traffic ............. 6 4. Site Plan ............................................ 9 5. Trip Distribution .................................... 10 6. Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 11 7. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ..................... 13 8. Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........... 14 9. Short Range (2005) Geometry .......................... 16 APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form/Condition Diagrams B Recent Peak Hour Traffic C Existing Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards D Short Range.Background Peak Hour Operation E Short Range Total Peak Hour Operation F Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Streets.............................................. 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 4 Existing Operation ................................... 4 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 4 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 4 Transit Facilities ................................... 7 III. Proposed Development ................................. 8 Trip Generation ...................................... 8 Trip Distribution .................................... 8 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 8 Trip Assignment ...................................... 12 Signal Warrants ...................................... 12 Operation Analysis ................................... 12 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 12 Bicycle Level of Service .......................... 17 Transit Level of Service ............................. 17 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 18 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Recent (2002) Peak Hour Operation 7 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 8 3. Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour.Operation .... 15 ' 4. Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Operation ......... 15 PARK CENTRAL TOWNHOMES TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JULY 2002 Prepared for: Dohn Construction, Inc 2642 Midpoint Drive, Unit A Fort Collins, CO 80525 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 � 15263�=i FUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worksheet Destination Approximate Distance Auto Travel Tnne Bus Travel Time Travel Trme Factor CSU Campus Transit Center 2.2 12 26 Foothills Fashion Mall 3.2 14 36 Fort Collins High School 2.8 13 29 Downtown Fort Collins 2.8 13 29 Total Travel Time 52 120 1 2.3 Service Level Standards Worksheet Mixed Use Remainder of Standard Centers and Commercial the Service Meets Standard faits Standard Corridors Area Hours of Weekday Service 18 hours 16 hours X Weekday Frequency of Service 15 minutes 20 minutes X Travel Time Factor 2.0 x 2.0 x X Peak Load Factor _< 1.2 s 1.2 X 3 of 4 = LOS B I4', IVlultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p.20 LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service - connectivity n utunnnn actual t,771 base connectivity: C A Q specific connections to priority sites: description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address Qt�F�NBut'G(f irL6�t.(, lj'G1}0pL PRcNG CLGar- Ate eoMmvQ-CcAL AQoti Sr> QL)m9A#r of :-&Plat( Racp9CY destination area classification (see text) PVf., (r- Scoteoc- StT( S[T 7' CoMSAUAAY'f ,.--'D N0rGd,LN4 - Amb e-em" gr-tAc- C ery R— A A A IMIMIMI C A A City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan N o T Q N J Lesher °m Junior High School Prospect r Stua 0 BIKE INFLUENCE AREA SCALE: 1 "=1000' 4: Prospect Horsetooth SCALE: 1"=2000' ROUTE PLAN FOR FORT COLLINS HIGH SCHOOL E H Fort Collins High School Figure 1 A& N o CD CIS Lesher Junior High School Prospect Riffenburgh Elementary Stua School I I I SCALE: 9"=l000' ROUTE PLAN FOR LESHER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL N w rn E m J E� Lesher Junior High School Prospect Riffenburgh Elementary Stua School SCALE: 1 "=1000' ROUTE PLAN FOR RIFFENBURGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p.18 LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: Sc-tbl-oo(- \A A(—Y—ik) s /) ze#4 , (enter as many as apply) destination area level of area level of service (loinimum based nn project nn project location classification) (see texo Nrnlneu ;owinuhy aJr4r InleretlS reaulty auuuJU« 1 nwonaan g g C g �gYf YUCtpd% acluol �t A 1) N proposed � �^`F ^Fi �'� � miltinnnn O p Q C Q ]rUSTrtOtrdU actuai �10 f1�7 o_ 1 iq7 proposed A � p d mnunnnn actual proposed uliiinu ml — actual proposed classificalion A g description of applicable destination area within 1,320' n including address KrFF6gR�UlDCs� C�Eru�ur�42Y �b aivo� ,Jururo� i�-�¢e!� �cefreoc� City of Port Collins 'Cransportation Hasler Plan City of Port Collins 'Cransportation Hasler Plan iM n� Ni-altimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian -Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification; Jt e Lk/ALKwyG #412EA I (enter as many as apply) I I❑ ❑© description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address 'GOPwa, Casey- -r eAa OFFie&S A -r LeMAY/SroOr mwag egeoO wesr or- COY destination area classification (see text) Q�R�drrauA �Fi►l� �r5�b+uttA�— level of service (minimum based on project location classification) Nrw'imu :aninulip real aoiJr 6r uul imenvi 6 rmvllp anuJ6a Illutii„Ian � .�. (•i /f — Q actual A Proposed A 4 1 .4 11111 YII11II II actual Proposed P. 18 City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan v N/wItimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P.18 L.OS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification' '5c000t_ Wm-gi je Qee4 (enter as many as apply) description of applicable destination area level of service (minimum based on project location classification) destination area within 1,320' classification including address (see text) N.wmeu ouHndi, mm aid � i�aJngi Imaal6 unvly uumlUo u6AZ IeIAAY 6fcrr COOAIl6t2CM1l. nwdnuun g B N13INYGIQsSurmou actual A 3 Q LVera(tsoQYeop To Y&• 4)o2i'µ 0 Nrl��Bm�+leo� To �tiSITD94)ir� &AST, A(-oNcL ® Foy= hoc.,. rNs c&.uP5 -mi mul City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan SCALE: 1"=2000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA .3G sr er+.nm+ne _ APPENDIX ,3 5 F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/6�/02� Analysis Time Period: am rl Intersection: Prospect/F.C. Club Access/Luke Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary 1 Analysis Year: recent hort bkgrd total Project ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: F.C. Club Access/Luke St. Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 1000 20 25 995 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1176 23 29 1170 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (o) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 10 1 25 5 1 S 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 11 1 29 5 1 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 LT LT I LTR I Southbound 11 12 LTR v (vph) 5 29 41 11 C(m) (vph) 590 675 172 85 v/c 0.01 0.04 0.24 0.13 95% queue length 0.03 0.13 0.89 0.43 Control Delay 11.2 10.6 32.4 53.6 LOS B B D F Approach Delay 32.4 53.6 Approach LOS D F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. i 4- HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5 6/02 Analysis Time Period: am m 'Intersection: rospect/F.C. Club Access/Luke Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0227 'East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: F.C. Club Access/Luke St. Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 5 825 25 30 810 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 970 29 35 952 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 2 0 0 2 0 'Lanes Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade ($) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 25 1 25 5 1 5 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.88 29 1 29 5 1 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No 0 1 0 LTR No 0 1 0 LTR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 Lane Config LT LT I LTR 1 Southbound 11 12 LTR v 5 35 59 11 C(m) (vph) 714 833 206 156 '(vph) v/c 0.01 0.04 0.29 0.07 95% queue length 0.02 0.13 1.13 0.22 Control Delay 10.1 9.5 29.3 29.8 LOS B A D D Approach Delay 29.3 29.8 Approach LOS D D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b ' Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 33 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/6/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Pro pect/Park East Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort bkgr total Project ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: Park East/Surgery Center Acces Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 955 90 30 970 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1085 102 33 1077 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 0 Configuration LT T R LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 25 1 65 5 1 iU Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 1 75 5 1 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' Lane Config LT LT I LT R I LTR v (vph) 5 33 30 75 41 C(m) (vph) 637 723 90 897 254 , v/c 0.01 0.05 0.33 0.08 0.16 95% queue length 0.02 0.14 1.28 0.27 0.57 Control Delay 10.7 10.2 63.8 9.4 21.9 LOS B B F A C , Approach Delay 24.9 21.9 Approach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 3Z HCS2O00: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/6/02 Analysis Time Period:/ �pm Intersection: rospect/Park East Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgr total 'Project ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: Park East/Surgery Center Acces Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Movement Eastbound 1 2 L T 3 R 1 4 I L Westbound 5 T 6 R Volume 30 795 50 20 810 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 903 56 21 870 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No 0 2 1 0 2 0 'Lanes Configuration LT T R LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume 35 1 55 5 1 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 39 1 62 5 1 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade ($) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) 'C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay ' LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Storage No 0 1 1 0 1 0 LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 LT LT I LT R I LTR 34 21 40 62 29 764 904 149 905 317 0.04 0.02 0.27 0.07 0.09 0.14 0.07 1.02 0.22 0.30 9.9 9.1 37.8 9.3 17.5 A A E A C 20.5 17.5 C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b ' Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1 31 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 5/6/02 Period: am pm Project ID: 227 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect/Lemay Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Coll i sus Year recent ort bkgrd otal N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R ( L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1145 665 120 1215 690 120 1125 885 180 1205 1285 230 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 EB Left A A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A A Green 8.0 30.0 6.0 4.0 42.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 269 1770 0.57 0.39 25.5 C TR 1037 3458 0.81 0.30 37.0 D 35.2 D Westbound L 269 1770 0.84 0.39 44.9 D T 1062 3539 0.68 0.30 32.7 C 33.3 C R 712 1583 0.18 0.45 16.6 B Northbound L 286 1770 0.48 0.50 20.7 C T 1486 3539 0.65 0.42 25.5 C 22.9 C R 871 1583 0.23 0.55 11.7 B Southbound L 323 1770 0.71 0.53 24.5 C T 1628 3539 0.89 0.46 31.0 C 27.4 C R 934 1583 0.28 0.59 10.2 B Intersection Delay = 29.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 30 tlI.JLUVU: J1l�i1G11LCU lialciJca: i..l •i ♦aJ ��GiV'[JJG Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/Lemay Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/6/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: ® pm Year recent OEDbkgrd total Project ID: 0227 E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: Lemay Avenue ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I' Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 2 0 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 'LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1155 585 75 1170 555 140 1285 1160 145 1145 670 70 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 'RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 'Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 8.0 30.0 8.0 4.0 40.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 296 1770 0.61 0.39 TR 1044 3479 0.74 0.30 Westbound L 269 17.70 T 1062 3539 681 1583 'R Northbound L 415 1770 T 1557 3539 902 1583 'R Southbound L 323 1770 T 1416 3539 ■ R 839 1583 Intersection Delay 0.70 0.39 0.57 0.30 0.23 0.43 26.0 C 34.5 C 31.0 C 30.4 C 18.2 B 32.9 C 28.5 C 0.81 0.53 27.5 C 0.88 0.44 31.5 C 28.9 C 0.19 0.57 10.5 B 0.49 0.50 20.1 C 0.52 0.40 24.1 C 22.5 C 0.09 0.53 11.7 B = 28.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS (970) 669-5034 Z APPENDIX E 1 z� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/6/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Prospect/F.C, Club Access/Luke Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hor bkgr total 'Project ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: F.C. Club Access/Luke St. Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Movement Eastbound 1 2 L T 3 R 1 4 I L Westbound 5 T 6 R Volume 5 1000 20 20 995 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1176 23 23 1170 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 2 0 0 2 0 'Lanes Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (�) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? 'Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Approach 'Movement Lane Config 10 1 20 5 1 5 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 11 1 23 5 1 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 .LT LT ( LTR I LTR v (vph) 5 23 35 11 C(m) (vph) 590 672 155 87 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.23 0.13 95% queue length 0.03 0.11 0.83 0.42 Control Delay 11.2 10.5 34.9 52.3 B B D F 'LOS Approach Delay 34.9 52.3 Approach LOS D F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2? HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' Date Performed: 5/6/02 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: rospect/F.C. Club Access/Luke Jurisdiction: Fort Collins ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hor bkgrd total Project ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: F.C. Club Access/Luke St. Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 825 25 25 810 ' 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 970 29 29 952 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR , Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 ' 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 25 1 20 5 1 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 1 23 5 1 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 , Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? ' Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT I LTR I LTR v (vph) 5 29 53 11 C(m) (vph) 714 833 195 160 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.27 0.07 95% queue length 0.02 0.11 1.06 0.22 Control Delay 10.1 9.5 30.2 29.2 LOS B A D D Approach Delay 30.2 29.2 Approach LOS D D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2- �0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/6/02 Analysis Time Period: am® Intersection: Prospect/Park East Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgr total N roject ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road orth/South Street: Park East/Surgery Center Acces Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 955 75 30 970 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1085 85 33 1077 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No 0 2 1 0 2 0 'Lanes Configuration LT T R LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 1 65 5 1 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 1 75 5 1 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Movement Lane Config EB 1 LT WB 4 1 LT I Northbound 7 8 LT 9 1 R I Southbound 10 11 12 LTR v (vph) 5 33 18 75 41 (vph) 637 735 88 897 255 'C(m) v/c 0.01 0.04 0.20 0.08 0.16 95% queue length 0.02 0.14 0.71 0.27 0.56 Control Delay 10.7 10.1 16.1 9.4 21.8 LOS B B F A C Approach Delay 18.4 21.8 Approach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' 25 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/6/02 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: Prospect/Park East Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgr total Project ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: Park East/Surgery Center Acces Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 30 795 45 20 810 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 903 51 21 870 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 0 Configuration LT T R LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 20 1 55 5 1 20 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.85 22 1 62 5 1 23 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT I LT R I LTR v (vph) 34 21 23 62 29 C(m) (vph) 764 909 148 904 318 v/c 0.04 0.02 0.16 0.07 0.09 95% queue length 0.14 0.07 0.53 0.22 0.30 Control Delay 9.9 9.1 33.7 9.3 17.5 LOS A A D A C Approach Delay 15.9 17.5 Approach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Z �' 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Prospect/Lemay Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/6/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am p%m Year recent or bkgrd total Project ID. 227 E/W St: Prospect Road N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ( Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1145 660 120 1210 690 115 1125 885 175 1200 1285 230 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A A Green 8.0 30.0 6.0 4.0 42.0 'Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 269 1770 0.57 0.39 25.5 C TR 1037 3457 0.80 0.30 36.8 D 35.0+ D Westbound L 269 1770 0.82 T 1062 3539 0.68 R 712 1583 0.17 Northbound L 286 1770 0.48 T 1486 3539 0.65 R 871 1583 0.22 Southbound L 323 1770 0.70 T 1628 3539 0.89 ■ R 934 1583 0.28 Intersection Delay = 28.8 0.39 42.4 D 0.30 32.7 C 32.8 C 0.45 16.5 B 0.50 20.7 C 0.42 25.5 C 22.9 C 0.55 11.7 B 0.53 23.6 C 0.46 31.0 C 27.3 C 0.59 10.2 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: (970) 669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 2,5 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 5/6/02 Period: am pm Project(: 0227 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect/Lemay Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Coll' s Year recent shor bkgr total N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T I R I I No. Lanes I I 1 2 0 I 1 1 2 1 I I 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1155 585 75 1165 550 135 1285 1160 145 1140 670 70 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 EB Left A A I NB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A Green 8.0 30.0 8.0 4.0 40.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Cycle Length: 100.0 _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 297 1770 0.61 0.39 25.9 C TR 1044 3479 0.74 0.30 34.5 C 32.8 C Westbound L 269 1770 0.67 T 1062 3539 0.57 R 681 1583 0.22 Northbound L 415 1770 0.81 T 1557 3539 0.88 R 902 1583 0.19 Southbound L 323 1770 0.48 T 1416 3539 0.52 R 839 1583 0.09 Intersection Delay = 28.2 0.39 29.8 C 0.30 30.3 C 28.2 C 0.43 18.1 B 0.53 27.5 C 0.44 31.5 C 28.9 C 0.57 10.5 B 0.50 20.0- B 0.40 24.1 C 22.4 C 0.53 11.7 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS secs 2Z APPENDIX D 2( 0 Table 4-3 ii: ." P`..11:..c u^#r%r uahfrio I nq S+arlrlarric IIInfP_rRP_Ct1nnsI - tand Use;(from:,structure,plan) 77 Commercial Other corridors within :corridors intersection type'; Moved use Low density mixed All other. - districts use residential " areas Signalized D E' D D intersections overall Stop sign control NIA F-' F" E (arterial/loc al —any approach leg) Stop sign control NIA C C C (collector/local— any approach leg) ' mitigating measures required " considered normal in an urban environment Page 4-22 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standard ' January 2,2001 Z� UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Leve"f-Senice Average Total Delay .eclveh A _< 10 B >10and<15 C > 15 and _< 25 >25and <35 LE > 35 and < 50 > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Total Delay sedveh A 7Average <10 B 10 and _< 20 C > 20 and _< 35 D > 35 and _< 55 E > 55 and _< 80 F > 80 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/6�/02 Analysis Time Period: am -l Intersection: Prospect/F.C. Club Access/Luke Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: F.C. Club Access/Luke St. Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 3 940 20 21 930 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 1105 23 24 1094 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 7 0 17 3 U 4 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 8 0 19 3 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0, 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT I LTR I LTR v (vph) 3 24 27 7 C(m) (vph) 630 701 212 140 v/c 0.00 0.03 0.13 0.05 95% queue length 0.01 0.11 0.43 0.16 Control Delay 10.7 10.3 24.4 32.1 LOS B B C D Approach Delay 24.4 32.1 Approach LOS C D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. IT HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 51 6/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Prospect/F.C. Club Access/Luke Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: F.C. Club Access/Luke St. Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? 0.85 0.85 902 28 'Lanes 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes 0.85 0.85 0.85 25 894 2 2 -- -- 0 2 0 LT TR No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration ' Delay, Approach EB IMovement 1 Lane Config LT 23 3 19 2 0 5 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.88 27 3 22 2 0 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 LT I LTR I LTR v (vph) 1 25 52 7 C(m) (vph) 753 871 218 292 v/c 0.00 0.03 0.24 95% queue length 0.00 0.09 0.90 0.07 Control Delay 9.8 9.3 26.6 17.6 LOS A A D C Approach Delay 26.6 17.6 Approach LOS D C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. I-7 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5/6/02 Analysis Time Period: am & Intersection: Prospect/Park East Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0227 East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: Park East/Surgery Center Acces Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 4 898 69 29 904 8 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 1020 78 32 1004 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 0 Configuration LT T R LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 15 1 60 5 0 29 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.85 17 1 69 5 0 34 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT I LT R I LTR v (vph) 4 32 18 69 39 C(m) (vph) 681 770 105 916 326 v/c 0.01 0.04 0.17 0.08 0.12 95% queue length 0.02 0.13 0.59 0.24 0.40 Control Delay 10.3 9.9 46.2 9.3 17.5 LOS B A E A C Approach Delay 16.9 17.5 Approach LOS C C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 12 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 5 6/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: rospect/Park East Access IJurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0227 'East/West Street: Prospect Road North/South Street: Park East/Surgery Center Acces Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 Westbound 5 6 0.25 L T R I L T R Volume 29 737 43 18 764 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.93 0.93 0.93 Flow Rate, HFR 32 837 48 19 821 6- 'Hourly Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 Configuration LT T R LT TR Upstream Signal? Yes No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? 'Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration ' Delay, Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config LT v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 17 0 53 2 0 18 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.85 19 0 60 2 0 21 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 1 0 1 0 LT R LTR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 LT I LT R I LTR 32 19 19 60 23 800 953 180 918 473 0.04 0.02 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.12 0.06 0.35 0.21 0.15 9.7 8.9 27.3 9.2 13.0 A A D A B 13.6 13.0 B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1b ' Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. lS Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 5/6/02 Period: am p Project ID: 227 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect/Lemay Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: For Collins Year ecen short bkgrd total N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1133 617 Ill 1198 642 109 1115 831 165 1189 1208 213 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A A Green 8.0 30.0 8.0 4.0 40.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 274 1770 0.51 0.39 23.7 C TR 1037 3458 0.75 0.30 34.6 C 32.9 C Westbound L 269 1770 0.77 T 1062 3539 0.64 R 744 1583 0.15 Northbound L 323 1770 0.39 T 1416 3539 0.64, R 839 1583 0.22 Southbound L 360 1770 0.59 T 1557 3539 0.87 R 902 1583 0.26 Intersection Delay = 28.1 0.39 36.8 D 0.30 31.6 C 30.8 C 0.47 15.2 B 0.50 19.2 B 0.40 26.5 C 23.7 C 0.53 12.6 B 0.53 18.8 B 0.44 31.1 C 27.0 C 0.57 11.0 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS secs 4-- Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 6/02 Period: (am)pm Project D• 0227 E/W St: Prospect Road Inter.: Prospect/Lemay Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fo Collins Year ecent) short bkgrd total N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes i 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I L T R I L T R L T R I Volume 1141 542 67 1155 517 126 1265 1090 134 1133 632 64 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X ' WB Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A Green 10.0 28.0 10.0 4.0 38.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 325 1770 0.51 0.39 23.2 C TR 975 3481 0.74 0.28 35.6 D 33.3 C Westbound L 305 1770 0.56 T 991 3539 0.57 681 1583 0.20 'R Northbound L 447 1770 0.70 T 1486 3539 0.86 902 1583 0.18 'R Southbound L 357 1770 0.41 T 1345 3539 0.52 R 839 1583 0.08 ' Intersection Delay = 28.1 0.39 25.0 C 0.28 31.7 C 28.2 C 0.43 17.9 B 0.53 20.4 C 0.42 31.9 C 27.9 C 0.57 10.4 B 0.50 18.8 B 0.38 25.3 C 23.2 C 0.53 11.6 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1b Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS W APPENDIX C IZ MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 4-30.02 Observer: Michael Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: Prospect/Luke/F.C. Club S = straight I = laft him Time Begins Northbound: F.C. Club Souhbound: Luke Total northisouth Eastbound: Prospect Westbound: Prospect Total east/west Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:30 4 1 1 1 4 9 1 0 1 2 11 1 157 7 165 4 145 0 149 314 325 7:45 3 0 4 7 0 0 1 1 8 1 0 188 8 196 4 164 1 169 365 373 8:00 6 1 8 15 0 0 2 2 17 0 225 2 227 3 218 0 221 448 465 8:15 10 1 3 14 1 0 1 2 16 0 178 7 185 11 187 1 199 384 400 7:30.8:30 23 1 3 1 19 45 2 1 0 1 5 7 52 1 1 748 1 24 773 1 22 714 1 2 738 1 1511 1563 PHF 0.75 0.88 0.85 1 0.83 4:30 2 0 5 7 0 1 0 1 1 1 8 0 300 7 307 6 215 3 224 531 539 4:45 1 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 5 1 259 6 266 3 241 1 245 511 516 5:00 2 0 3 5 3 0 1 4 9 0 262 3 265 5 223 0 228 493 502 5:15 2 1 0 1 5 7 0 0 2 2 9 2 243 4 249 7 213 2 222 471 480 4:30.5:30 1 1 0 1 17 24 3 1 0 1 4 7 31 1 3 1064 20 1087 1 21 1 892 1 6 919 1 2006 2037 PHF 1 0.89 1 0.94 C R = right tum S = straight MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 4.25.02 Observer: Michael Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Intersection: Prospect/Prospect Park East Time Begins Northbound: Park East Souhbound: Surgery Ctr. Total north/south Eastbound: Prospect Westbound: Prospect Total eastlwest Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:30 3 0 17 20 1 0 6 7 27 6 178 9 193 7 200 0 207 400 427 7:45 2 0 18 20 0 0 3 3 23 8 212 14 234 4 219 1 224 458 481 8:00 7 0 8 15 0 0 6 6 21 10 187 9 206 4 200 3 207 413 434 8:15 5 0 10 15 1 0 3 4 19 5 179 11 195 3 192 2 197 392 411 7:30.8:30 17 1 0 1 53 70 2 1 0 18 1 20 1 90 29 1 756 1 43 828 18 811 1 6 1 835 1 1663 1 1753 PHI 1 0.71 0.88 0.93 4:30 5 1 0 16 21 1 0 7 8 29 0 188 12 200 6 251 1 258 458 487 4:45 7 1 14 22 3 0 6 9 31 1 218 15 234 8 224 4 236 470 501 5:00 1 0 16 17 1 0 10 11 28 2 240 25 267 8 217 2 227 494 522 5:15 2 0 14 16 0 0 6 B 22 1 222 17 240 7 203 1 211 451 473 4:30.5:30 15 1 1 1 60 76 5 1 0 1 29 34 1 110 1 4 868 1 69 1 941 1 29 895 1 8 1 932 1 1873 1983 PHI I 0.88 1 1 0.9 ME MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669.2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 2-7-02 Observer: City of Fort Collins Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: Lemay/Prospect S = straight I = loft film Time Begins Northbound: Lemay Southbound: Lemay Total northisouth Eastbound: Prospect Westbound: Prospect Total eastlwest Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:30 87 260 1 33 380 33 186 9 228 608 28 122 16 166 39 146 17 202 368 976 7:45 71 356 31 458 36 152 16 204 662 47 176 18 241 38 142 41 221 462 1124 6:00 51 240 37 328 28 137 23 188 516 37 125 21 183 39 118 40 197 380 896 8:15 56 234 31 321 35 157 16 208 529 1 29 113 12 154 40 113 29 182 336 865 7:30.8:30 265 1090 132 1 1487 132 632 1 64 1 828 1 2315 1141 1 536 1 67 744 156 519 127 1 802 1 %6 3861. ' PHI 0.81 0.91 0.77 0.91 4:30 16 190 26 232 47 295 1 48 390 622 27 136 31 1 194 47 156 1 22 225 419 1041 4:45 33 223 29 285 38 260 1 36 334 619 39 144 26 209 52 176 23 251 460 1079 5:00 44 184 47 275 37 304 73 414 689 36 126 28 190 45 153 45 243 433 1122 5:15 22 234 42 298 43 349 56 448 746 31 133 26 190 56 163 19 236 428 1174 4:30.5:30 115 831 144 1 1090 165 1208 213 1586 2676 1133 539 111 783 200 648 109 957 1740 4416 PHI 0.91 0.89 0.94 1 0.95 APPENDIX B 0 A& N SCALE: 1" W' w 11' A& N SCALE: 1 =W c O } -11 W tape - 11' 11' 11.5' 11.5' 11.5' MY storage 9.5' ' DM Attachment "B" Transportation Impact Study Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet List the pedestrian destinations within 1320' (1.5 miles for schools) of the project boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian Level of Service for the facility/corridor linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity, types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and security of the selected route(s). 4&WAY/PP-osP&Ct COIAAReC(AC /,)O e-r* P&5cbG4)tc AL CJ C C14 F-oIZ-r �Ou'e'ous ecu-b s SPR.(,uG Cv,It '7'2AIL, L(57m AY/S-ruAier C'oA-g&2CcAC— C WES-r ;26rs(DG.U-rrAL 2FS - R4Fr-FNgv1P6K &.(3. L �14S - LEsO&P- J.H.S. Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 J -rjLrP �Dr Sre 18UT(OA-) 51 Summary of Trip Generation Calculation ' For 34 Dwelling Units of Residential Condominium / Townhouse May 06, 2002 Average Rate Standard Deviation Adjustment Factor Driveway Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 7.65 0.00 1.00 260 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.11 0.00 1.00 4 ' 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.53 0.00 1.00 18 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.64 0.00 1.00 22 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.50 0.00 1.00 17 ' 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 0.24 0.00 1.00 8 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 0.74 0.00 1.00 25 AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter 0.11 0.00 1.00 4 AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit 0.51 0.00 1.00 17 AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total 0.63 0.00 1.00 21 PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter 0.53 0.00 1.00 18 PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit 0.29 0.00 1.00 10 ' PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total 0.82 0.00 1.00 28 Saturday 2-Way Volume 16.20 0.00 1.00 551 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.83 0.00 1.00 28 ' Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.71 0.00 1.00 24 Saturday Peak Hour Total 1.54 0.00 1.00 52 Sunday 2-Way Volume 13.64 0.00 1.00 464 Sunday Peak Hour Enter 0.83 0.00 1.00 28 Sunday Peak Hour Exit 0.87 0.00 1.00 30 Sunday Peak Hour Total 1.70 0.00 1.00 --58 Note: A zero indicates no data available. - ' The above rates were calculated from these equations: 24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) _ .85LN(X) + 2.564, R^2 = 0.83 7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) _ .79LN(X) + .298 R^2 = 0.74 , 0.17 Enter, 0.83 Exit 4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) _ .827LN(X) + .309 R^2 = 0.79 , 0.67 Enter, 0.33 Exit AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) _ .808LN(X) + .209 R^2 = 0.78 , 0.18 Enter, 0.82 Exit PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) _ .777LN(X) + .59 R^2 = 0.8 , 0.65 Enter, 0.35 Exit Sat. 2-Way Volume: T = 3.615(X) + 427.925, R^2 = 0.84 Sat. Pk Hr. Total: T = .286(X) + 42.627 Sun. 2-Way Volume: T = 3.132(X) + 357.258, R^2 = 0.88 Sun. Pk Hr. Total: T = .232(X) + 50.009 R^2 = 0.78 , 0.49 Enter, 0.51 Exit Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th� Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS 3 Attachment "A" Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project Informatioq Project Name PAeK CEA)TEAL /o�vNrtatitES Project Location lSourr4 o P PQoSPEC-r &s r o F LerHAt TIS Assumptions Type of Study Full: 4)0 Intermediate: yG S Study Area Boundaries North: , South: Feds9e -r East: Access West: [ 6u p Y Study Years Short Range: 2 erg— Long Range: -2—r Future Traffic Growth Rate Study Intersections 1. All access drives 5. a. Q�csPECT �� eti A y 6. 3. 7. 4. 8. Time Period for Study AM: 7:00-9:00 PM: 4:00-6: Sat Noon: ti o Trip Generation Rates Trip Adjustment Factors Passby: MIA Captive 'v Market: ( A Overall Trip Distribution North South East West Mode Split Assumptions Committed Roadway Improvements C , -r y Other Traffic Studies ��,�,NAc�,� oWUbFoAwWs ? Areas Requiring Special Study Date: s�t Zc Z Traffic Engineer: R't A T Local Entity Engineer: Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 2 APPENDIX A IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of Park Central Townhomes on the short range (2005) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: The development of Park Central Townhomes is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, Park Central Townhomes will generate approximately 260 daily trip ends, 22 morning peak hour trip ends, and 25 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Currently, the key intersections operate acceptably with current control and geometry. - In the short range (2005) future, signals will not likely be warranted at any existing stop sign control intersections. In the short range (2005) background traffic future, the key intersections will operate acceptably. - In the short range (2005) future, given full development of Park Central Townhomes and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably. The short range (2005) geometry is shown in Figure 9. - Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit. modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines. 18 quarter mile of Park Central Townhomes. These are: 1) various commercial/office. uses adjacent to the Prospect/Lemay intersection, 2) residential neighborhood across Prospect Road, 3) residential neighborhood along Welch Street, 4) the Fort Collins Club, 5) the Spring Creek Trail, 6) the commercial/office uses that are adjacent to the Lemay/Stuart intersection, and '7) the residential neighborhood west of Lemay Avenue. Riffenburgh Elementary School and Lesher Junior High School are within one mile of Park Central Townhomes. This site is in an area termed "school walking area." The minimum level of service for "school walking area" is B for all measured categories, except for visual interest and amenities which is C. The Pedestrian LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix F. It is concluded that acceptable pedestrian level of service is/will be achieved. The walking routes to the schools that will serve the Park Central Townhomes are shown in Appendix F. Both Riffenburgh Elementary School and Lesher Junior High School are within a reasonable walking distance of the site. Fort Collins High School is almost 3 miles from the Park Central Townhomes. While the school route is provided, it is not likely that there would be many/any students who would choose to walk to Fort Collins High School. Bicycle Level of Service Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are three destinations within 1320 feet of Park Central Townhomes. These are: 1) Riffenburgh Elementary School, 2) the Spring Creek Trail, and 3) the commercial area in the southeast quadrant of the Prospect/Lemay intersection. Park Central Townhomes will have direct connectivity to the Spring Creek Trail. There are existing bike lanes on Welch Street, which is adjacent to Riffenburgh Elementary School. The bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix F. With a connection to the Spring Creek Trail and bike lanes on Welch Street, level of service C connectivity is achieved. Transit Level of Service Currently, Route 5 provides transit service in the area. In the future, transit service will be improved. In the future, there will be 30 minute transit service on South Lemay Avenue. It is anticipated that the level of service will be in the D category with implementation of the City's Transit Development Plan. A future transit level of service worksheet is provided in Appendix F. 17 A& N L y m N U m U co �UQ Y N J J Prospect �I • N aWm V3� < d w< 0 +— - Denotes Lane SHORT RANGE (2005) GEOMETRY Figure 9 16 TABLE 3 Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour Operation Prospect/Park East Access NB APPROACH C C TABLE 4 Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Operation (signal) NB C C 15 O co O O N O 0 0 � mqt 1551145 —� 5851665 —� 751120 —y N m N C C U N m E U in U Q 0 � m J J 140/120 `�' p 10/10 515 �— 555/690 170/215 u) NI zI " �— 810/970 J + � 20/30 wO Ln Iz w810/995 J + � 30/25 - � � Prospect 30/5 n O 5/5 O 795/955 to to O — 50/90 � to � � N Z 825/1000 —► 25/20 � O O '� u, 0 Q N Z N coOa LD N V) 0 H C 4) w U) QW (D O M U V < (L 0 --•-- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehides SHORT RANGE (2005) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8 14