HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNIVERSITY CENTER FOR THE ARTS - SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW - 34-02 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORTUniversity Center for the Arts — Site Plan Advisory Review, #12-02
August 1, 2002
Page 6
Neighborhood Plan suggest that higher traffic generating uses are most
appropriately placed in locations such as the subject property, that are situated at
the perimeter of the neighborhood and along a higher capacity street Remington.
CONCLUSIONS:
After reviewing the University Center for the Arts Site Plan Advisory Review, File #12-02,
staff offers the following conclusions:
1. The location of the University Center for the Arts addition is incompatible with the
historic spatial relationships of the existing building, the park, the front lawn and
the streetscape context, and the site and neighborhood.
2. The character of the University Center for the Arts addition is compatible with the
historic building fagade treatment and materials found on the existing building
and within the immediate neighborhood.
3. The extent of the University Center for the Arts, with regard to the proposed
building square footage and operational characteristics, is compatible with the
site and neighborhood.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Board disapprove the CSU Center for the
Performing Arts Site Plan Advisory Review, File #12-02.
List of Attachments:
A- Site Vicinity Map
B- CSU Public Outreach Summary
C- Addition Options Matrix
D- Development and Phasing Schedule
E- Development Plans
University Center for the Arts — Site Plan Advisory Review, #12-02
August 1, 2002
Page 5
B. Character
The proposed architectural style and building materials are effectively differentiated
from the existing historic building, yet are compatible with its size, scale and
architecture. The existing building is faced with red brick, and includes rich,
Georgian and Federal style details such as the block quoining of buff -colored brick
at the building corners and doors, and significant fenestration. New window
placement and vertical elements appear to reflect the rhythm and spacing found in
the original design. The majority of the new fagade covering is brick, with pre -cast
concrete base and cornice details giving the building well-defined base, middle and
top treatments. Precast concrete columns and metal detailing between the columns
is reminiscent of forms found in the 1924 construction.
Foundation plantings and landscaping adjacent to the new addition help break up
the overall mass of the addition and better define pedestrian spaces.
C. Extent
The existing building includes a total of 156,916 sq.ft. of floor area. The new
additions will provide an additional 28,830 sq.ft., for a total of 185,746 sq.ft. The
majority of the new building addition, at 47.5 feet in height, virtually matches that of
the main cornice line of the original 1924 building. The amount of overall building
mass being added to the building appears to be consistent with the mass, bulk and
scale of the existing building. The latest plans indicate the elimination of "fly' space
above the prior performance hall space; this has reduced the height substantially
from previous design iterations.
The new addition will increase the impervious area of the site. This increase will
result in an increase in storm drainage runoff, beyond what the system in place is
currently capable of handling. In order to accommodate increased runoff, two
detention ponds will be constructed on the north side of the site, immediately
abutting Pitkin Street.
A full traffic report has not been submitted to date, but preliminary summary
information indicates that the surrounding street intersections will continue to
perform at a satisfactory Level of Service upon completion of the project. No traffic
signals, control measures or other facilities will need to be installed or improved as
a result of the new use. Transportation policies found in the East Side
University Center for the Arts — Site Plan Advisory Review, #12-02
August 1, 2002
Page 4
south to north along the facade) from Remington Street; with the 1953 addition
having a relatively consistent 145-foot frontyard setback.
The applicant's submitted plans and written materials suggest that three alternate
placement options were examined during the design process: toward the east,
north, and west of the 1953 addition. Of the three options, the applicant has chosen
to pursue the addition toward the west for budgetary, programmatic and site design
reasons. The applicant's alternatives analysis (please refer to Attachment C)
suggests that this option would be the most cost effective and provides the best
public access to the performance hall lobby. Also, the project designers assert that
projection of the addition toward the street, creating an L-shaped building form,
helps to better define the yard area in front of the historic 1924 building and. to
visually "frame" the view from the park space across the street to the west.
While a building addition to the west, in front of the 1953 addition, may be more cost
effective and space efficient than the other options, the loss of the open area in
front of the building and the resulting change in the spatial relationship of the
building to the street, is not justified. Old Fort Collins High School expresses many
of the ideals of the "City Beautiful" Movement that influenced urban the form of
many cities across the nation during the first part of the twentieth century. Among
the principles of the movement were carefully designed neoclassical buildings set
in spacious landscaping according to a comprehensive master plan. Denver's Civic
Center, Cheesman Park, are prime examples of the movement's influence in
Colorado. William Bowman, the architect of record for the 1924 Fort Collins High
School was an influential player in the movement, having been involved in the
design and construction of the Denver City and County Building. Old Fort Collins
High School is the sole remaining example of the City Beautiful movement in this
community, beyond those within the boundaries of the CSU campus.
The architectural style of the 1953 building addition has been criticized by some
during discussions about the proposed addition; however, the architects of this
previous addition carefully considered and honored the significance and design
tenets of the overall high school master plan. While incorporating the programmatic
requirements of the gymnasium and its support spaces, the 1953 addition respected
the original building as the "primary facade" and the overall relationship between the
buildings, the park, the front lawn and streetscape context, and the site and the
neighborhood.
Staff's position is that the appropriate way to maintain the significance of the 1924
primary building facade, and maintain the relationship between the building and the
site, is to avoid placing any new additions in front of the plane created by the
existing building.
University Center for the Arts — Site Plan Advisory Review, #12-02
August 1, 2002
Page 3
Under the statute, if the Planning and Zoning Board disapproves the site plan, such
disapproval may be overturned by a two-thirds vote of the State Board of Agriculture.
Even though the old Fort Collins High School building has been designated as an historic
landmark under Chapter 14 of the City Code, and even though the site was not exempted
by annexation ordinance from City planning, zoning or landmarking laws, subsequent
acquisition of the building by CSU exempts the site from compliance with City landmark
regulations. Therefore, City review is limited to the location, character and extent review
defined in the statutory requirements.
Leading up to the Planning and Zoning Board public hearing on this project, Colorado State
University Facilities staff and their consultant team attended three Planning and Zoning
Board worksessions to present building models, floor plans, and photosimulations of the
proposed building additions. Worksession discussions were held on April 26, May 10 and
May 31 s'
No City -sponsored neighborhood meeting was held as part of this application; however,
Colorado State University conducted a separate public outreach program. Citizen
comments were received through a variety of media: a dedicated project website,
presentations to various FCHS reunions, postings to the CSU community, and multiple
neighborhood meetings/open houses. A summary of the citizen involvement effort,
including written comments received during the course of the outreach program, are
included in Attachment B.
2. Location. Character and Extent:
A. Location
The University Center for the Arts site is located within the Eastside Neighborhood
(ESN) Plan boundary. The ESN Plan is an element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan, City Plan, and was formally adopted in 1986 after a lengthy public process.
The primary building addition, housing the performance hall, instrument rehearsal
area, and support space, is proposed west of the 1953 building addition, projecting
into the area historically part of the front lawn and hardscaped entry area. The
proposed addition will have an approximate frontyard setback of 50 feet from the
Remington Street right-of-way (75 feet to the curbline) and approximately 140 feet
from the Pitkin Street right-of-way (170 feet to the curbline). The original 1924
construction has a setback varying between 70 feet and 135 feet (measured from
University Center for the Arts — Site Plan Advisory Review, #12-02
August 1, 2002
Page 2
COMMENTS:
Background
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: NCB/NCM Residential Neighborhood
S: NCL Residential Neighborhood
E: NCL Residential Neighborhood
W: CC, park, parking area, residential; Not Zoned (CSU campus)
The property is part of L.C. Moore's Second Addition to the original town plat.
The old Fort Collins High School building was designated as a local Historic Landmark in
1994. Designation includes the original 1924 construction, its 1953 gymnasium addition
and the 1983 addition to the South. The designation does not include the rear shop
facility/bus barn/student center (1927 with additions of 1928, 1941, and 1971) or any other
buildings on the property.
Historic survey information indicates that the building is both historically and architecturally
significant. The building holds a unique place in the City's history as the third named Fort
Collins High School and its continuous school use for approximately 70 years. The original
building, designed by a prominent Denver Architect, William N. Bowman, is an excellent
example of the Colonial Revival and Classical Revival style. It is most notable for its
Classical Revival main entrance, with a central pedimented gable surmounting a three-
story portico with eight massive support columns.
2. Process
Colorado State University has agreed with the City to process this review under Section
31-23-209, C.R.S., which states:
"When the commission (Planning and Zoning Board) has adopted the master plan
of the municipality or of one or more major sections or districts thereof, no street,
square, park, or other public way, ground or open space, public 'building or
structure, or publicly or privately owned public utility shall be constructed or
authorized in the municipality or in such planned section and district until the
location, character and extent thereof has been submitted for approval by the
commission."
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 1, 2002
PROJECT: University Center for the Arts Site Plan Advisory Review
OWNER: Colorado State University
Facilities Management
251 Edison Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
APPLICANT: Brian Fagerstrom
c/o Slater Paull Architects
1515 Arapahoe Street Suite 400
Denver, CO 80202
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The University Center for the Arts Site Plan Advisory Review is a request to renovate the
former Fort Collins High School building and construct a 28,830 gross sq.ft. performance
hall, instrumental rehearsal area, dance studio, and support space addition. The main
addition along the west fagade will be constructed with a pre -cast concrete base treatment,
brick veneer, precast concrete columns and cornice details, and metal detailing, to reflect
the character of the existing, historic brick building. The school is located at 1400
Remington Street and is zoned NCL- Neighborhood Conservation Low Density.
RECOMMENDATION: Disapproval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This request for review from Colorado State University is submitted to the Planning and
Zoning Board as a Site Plan Advisory Review pursuant to State Statute Section 31-23-209,
which limits the City's review to the location, character and extent of the improvements.
The recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board is forwarded to the State Board
of Agriculture for its consideration.
Staff has concluded that the character and extent of proposed improvements complies with
the review criteria, while the proposed location of the addition is incompatible with the
historic spatial relationships of the existing building, the park, the front lawn and the
streetscape context, and the site and neighborhood.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT