HomeMy WebLinkAboutIN-SITU - MODIFICATION OF STANDARDS - 46-02 - REPORTS - MODIFICATION REQUESTPhoto 1. View of Proposed In -Situ Development Parcel. (View is from north property
boundary looking south toward the Cache la Poudre River.)
Photo 2. Another View of the Proposed In -Situ Development Parcel. (View is from same
point looking southeast.)
s° 230CRAMEM9 INC.
916 Willshire Ave. • Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 • (970) 493-4394
September 27, 2002
Linda Ripley
VF Ripley Associates, Inc.
401 W. Mountain Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80521
RE: Preliminary Ecological Characterization of the Proposed In -Situ Development Site (-4 acres
immediately east of Team Petroleum at 105 Lincoln)
I reviewed the habitat characteristics of the subject property on September 24, 2002. The nearly level
site has been disturbed by past ground clearing activity and currently does not support any natural
communities, habitats, or native vegetation except for two relatively young cottonwoods at the southern
property edge. The City Forester may classify the two cottonwood trees as significant if they are non -
cotton bearing. The remaining vegetation supported on site consists entirely of non-native grasses and
annual weedy species. Dominant species noted during the site survey included smooth brome
(Bromopsis inermis), crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum), kochia (Bassia sieversiana), Russian
thistle (Salsola australis), and leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). The entire site had been mowed
(presumably for weed control) and vegetation height was generally less than 3 inches. No vegetation,
soils, or hydrologic evidence of wetlands is present on the property. Photos 1 and 2 provide
representative views of the property.
Because of its current degraded condition and lack of vegetation cover there is no significant wildlife use
of the property. In spite of its proximity to the Poudre River Corridor, the site does not provide any
suitable habitat for Ute ladies' -tresses orchid or Preble's meadow jumping mouse. The lack of wetlands
and suitable vegetation cover precludes the potential presence of these two species.
The only natural habitat area within 500 feet of the property is the Cache la Poudre River corridor. The
river corridor is located immediately south of the property and is separated from the property by the
Poudre River Trail. The City's 300-foot buffer setback from the river would apply to development on the
development parcel unless a variance from the Planning and Zoning Board can be obtained. .
Linda, this concludes my initial assessment of the possible In -Situ development site. If you have any
questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
C EDAn CP EEK AssocNAT Es, INC.
T. Michael Phelan
Wildlife Ecologist
attachment
• Being a water testing and monitoring company, In -Situ
wants to demonstrate responsible environmentally
sensitive design and development. They view this site as
an opportunity to demonstrate that development can be
environmentally sensitive by creating an environment that
improves wildlife habitat and enhances the Poudre River
Corridor.
• By utilizing sensitive site -planning and creative
architecture, the Poudre River Corridor can be buffered
from vehicular impacts of Lincoln Avenue as well as from
the parking lot associated with this project.
• By locating adjacent to the river, In -Situ can monitor
water quality in the river utilizing their equipment and
make this information available to the City.
Regarding the "Frequent view/access." requirement:
• In-Situ's operational structure requires a building footprint
that accommodates 41,625 square feet on the ground
floor. While it is anticipated that the first phase of the
building will be approximately 25,000 square feet, the site
needs to accommodate the full 41,625 square feet.
Designing a building that was only 125 feet wide parallel
to the river would require the building to encroach into the
buffer even further.
• The south side of the building will face the Poudre River
Corridor and connect to the Poudre River Trail, providing
a strong bike /pedestrian connection linking this
employment use with Old Town and the City's larger
recreational/commuter trail system.
• Parking located adjacent to the buffer will be well
screened with screen walls and plant material.
• The site plan and the architectural design of the building
work together to create a strong and attractive visual
appearance from both the Poudre River Trail and Lincoln
Avenue.
As proposed, the design of the project would not degrade
the existing ecological character, which is very poor. A
primary goal of the project is to upgrade the ecological
character and enhance wildlife use.
(t) The project shall be designed to integrate with and
otherwise preserve existing site topography, including but
not limited to such characteristics as steepness of slopes,
existing drainage features, rock outcroppings, river and
stream terraces, valley walls, ridgelines and scenic
topographic features.
The developable site is flat and featureless
(g) The project shall be designed to enhance the natural
ecological characteristics of the site. if existing
landscaping within the buffer zone is determined by the
decision maker to be incompatible with the purposes of the
buffer zone, then the applicant shall undertake restoration
and mitigation measures such as regrading and/or the
replanting of native vegetation.
Replacing the existing non-native and weedy species with
native trees, shrubs and groundcovers is a project
objective.
(h) The project shall be designed to provide appropriate
human access to natural habitats and features and their
associated buffer zones to provide for passive recreational
uses such as hiking, fishing, photography, nature
observation and environmental education consistent with
the goals and objectives of the Natural Areas Policy Plan
and the General Management Guidelines for City -Owned
Natural Areas and Open Spaces, provided that such
access is compatible with the ecological character and
wildlife use of the natural habitat or feature.
The project will include a trail connection between the
Poudre River trail and the building.
In summary:
Regarding encroachment into the buffer zone:
• The applicant proposes to create a native landscape and
wildlife habitat where currently none exist. Utilizing a
variety of plant material species including trees, shrubs
and groundcovers, the applicant will significantly enhance
this section of the Poudre River Corridor over what exists
today.
By planting trees and shrubs on the southern half of the
site, the existing wildlife corridor along the River will be
more buffered from automobile impacts and other human
disturbances than it is today.
(c) The project shall be designed to preserve significant
existing trees and other significant existing vegetation on
the site.
Two existing cottonwood trees are within the buffer zone
which will require evaluation from the City Forester
and may not be necessarily removed. ( See Preliminary
Ecological Characterization letter from Cedar Creek
Associates 'attached).
(d) The project shall be designed to protect from adverse
impact species utilizing special habitat features such as
key raptor habitat features, including nest sites, night
roosts and key feeding areas as identified by the Colorado
Division of Wildlife or in the Fort Collins Natural Areas
Policy Plan (NAPP); key production areas, wintering areas
and migratory feeding areas for waterfowl; key use areas
for wading birds and shorebirds; key use areas for migrant
songbirds; key nesting areas for grassland birds; fox and
coyote dens; mule deer winter concentration areas as
identified by the Colorado Division of Wildlife or NAPP;
prairie dog colonies over fifty (50) acres in size as included
on the Natural Habitats and Features Inventory Map; key
areas for rare, migrant or resident butterflies as identified in
the NAPP; areas of high terrestrial or aquatic insect
diversity as.identified in the NAPP; remnant native prairie
habitat; mixed foothill shrub land; foothill ponderosa pine
forest; plains cottonwood riparian woodlands; and any
wetland greater than one -quarter (114) acre in size.
There are no key habitat areas associated with the site.
The applicant, however, is committed to developing a
wetland area that would increase wildlife habitat potential
and demonstrate responsible, ecologically sensitive
development. A wetland habitat would also provide the
company with an opportunity to demonstrate their water
monitoring equipment.
(e) The project shall be designed so that the character of the
proposed development in terms of use, density, traffic
generation, quality of runoff water, noise, lighting and
similar potential development impacts shall minimize the
degradation of the ecological character or wildlife use of
the affected -natural habitats or features.
JUSTIFICATION
The primary justification for this proposal relating to the Modification
Criteria Section 2.8.2(H)(1) is that the proposed plan will serve the
standard equally well or better than would a plan which complies
with the standard. We believe that the proposed project meets this
criterion in the following ways:
Regarding encroachment into the 300-foot buffer and the view
access requirements:
The Land Use Code provides guidance regarding under what
circumstances buffer zones can or should be modified. The buffer
zone performance standards are described below:
(1) Buffer Zone Performance Standards. The decision maker
shall approve buffer zones for each natural habitat or
feature contained in the project site. The buffer zones may
be multiple and non-contiguous. The general buffer zone
distance shall be established according to the criteria
contained in the table below (in this case 300 feet), but
the decision maker may modify any portion of the
general buffer zone distance provided that the
performance standards set forth below are achieved.
This may result in buffer zones of either greater or lesser
distance than those specified in the table below. The '
decision maker may also modify such buffer zone distance
if the strict application of this subsection will impose an
exceptional and undue hardship upon the property owner
or developer. The buffer zone performance standards are
as follows:
(a) The project shall be designed to preserve or enhance the
ecological character or function and wildlife use of the
natural habitat or feature and minimize or adequately
mitigate the foreseeable impacts of development.
The ecological character of the buffer zone will be greatly
enhanced over what exists today. The non-native and
annual weedy species will be replaced with a variety of
native trees, shrubs and groundcovers that will not only
buffer the river corridor, but create wildlife habitat where
currently none exists. The applicant commits to working
closely with City Staff on this enhancement program.
(b) The project shall be designed to preserve or enhance the
existence of wildlife movement corridors between natural
features, both within and adjacent to the site.
Preliminary concept sketches for the new facility indicate that
development may encroach into the 300-foot buffer zone by as
much as 30-45%. It is clear that the site cannot accommodate the
facility and proposed expansion without encroaching more than the
20% allowed by Code. Despite this stumbling block, the owners
believe their project and this site are compatible because of the
reasons stated above. Initial conversations with the Division of
Natural Resources and Planning
have been positive.
In discussions with City `staff, alternative conceptual siteplanswere
evaluated. The Natural Resource Staff stated a strong preference
for a building orientation that would buffer the Poudre River
Corridor from parking areas and Lincoln Avenue. The disturbance
associated with vehicles and automobile emissions were cited as
concerns that prompted.staff to encourage a building orientation
that buffers the Corridor from the influence of automobiles.
Representatives from both Current and Advanced Planning
departments pointed out that the Zoning District requires
view/access corridors along the river and requires parking to be
located to the interior of a project or in side yards.
The current concept places the building in the northeast corner of
the site with the parking predominantly in the east side yard.
However the building axis parallel to the river is wider than the
maximum 125 feet allowed by Code without a Modification.
The requests are for:
(1) A modification to allow disturbance or construction
activity within the 300- feet buffer zone, as defined in
Section 3.4.1 (E)(2).
(2) A modification to allow the building along the axis of the
river from the 125 feet wide allowed by Code to a
maximum of 255 feet wide, leaving a view / access
corridor of approximately 115 feet.
space used for research and development, software, sales,
administration and meetings.
LOCATION AND CONTEXT
The McKee brothers would like to develop their new facility on
approximately four acres. of land located on the south side of East
Lincoln Avenue between Team Petroleum and Alliance ,
Construction. The site borders the Poudre River for approximately
211 feet along its southern boundary.
The site is attractive to In -Situ because it is located along the river
and because of its proximity to Old Town. Since In -Situ is an
environmental company, the owners would like to create a facility
that demonstrates environmentally responsible design and
development. With the exception of two young cottonwood trees
along the southern edge of the property, the site currently does not
support any natural commuhities, habitats, or native vegetation.
(See Preliminary Ecological Characterization letter from Cedar
Creek Associates attached.)
The McKee brothers see the site as an opportunity to replace the
existing non-native vegetation and weedy species with a native
Colorado landscape.that would include a variety of plant species
and wildlife habitats. They are particularly interested in creating a
wetland habitat on -site in order to demonstrate water quality testing
and monitoring utilizing their equipment. In addition, they have
offered to utilize their equipment to test and monitor the quality of
water in the Poudre River at their site and provide the City with on-
going data regarding water quality.
Being located along the Poudre River bike trail and in close
proximity to Old Town are positive aspects for employees. The
owners are hopeful that many of their employees will bike to work
rather than drive their cars. The bike trail provides convenient
access and close proximity to Old Town and creates opportunities
for employees to do errands, shop and/or eat lunch without having
to drive.
EXPLANATION OF MODIFICATION REQUESTS
Per the City's Land Use Code, the project is required provide a
300- foot buffer from the Poudre River. The buffer distance can be
averaged, but no more than a 20% encroachment can be allowed,
without a modification, as measured from the top of bank.
loss suffered by the community because of the disturbance,
and shall be based on such mitigation and restoration plans
and reports as have been requested, reviewed and
approved by the decision maker..."
Modification request No. 2:
This request is for a modification to the "Frequent Views/Access."
requirement as outlined in the Community Commercial — Poudre
River District, City of Fort Collins Land Use Code. The modification
being requested is from section 4.16 (D)(3)(a)(3. ), Buildings.
Frequent views/access. This regulation reads as follows:
3. Frequent views/access. No building wall shall exceed on
hundred twenty-five (125) feet on the axis along the
River.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
In -Situ Inc. is recognized as a premier manufacturer of
environmental monitoring equipment. Around the world, water
quality is fast becoming a primary environmental concern for
industrialized and developing nations alike. The expertise of
professionals is required to protect and ensure the safety of
groundwater and surface water resources. In-Situ's mission is to
provide these experts with the tools they need for reliable, accurate
assessment of site conditions, specifically for surface and ground
water monitoring.
The company, owned and operated by brothers Craig and
Christopher McKee, was originally established in Laramie,
Wyoming in 1978. The present facility occupies several historic
buildings in downtown Laramie and employs 65 people.
The McKee brothers want to design a new facility that will not only
enhance their current operation but will provide them with
expansion capability. In addition, the move will bring them closer to
vendors they work with and customers they serve as well as help
them attract top quality employees and ultimately make them more
competitive in the marketplace.
In -Situ has relationships with numerous vendors along the Front
Range that provide the actual manufactured parts per design
specifications that are used in the monitoring instruments.
Approximately 20% of the company's space is devoted to light
assembly of parts, while the remaining space is essentially office
L]
November 19, 2002
YF RIPLEY
ASSOCIATES INC.
Landscape .ArchiteCturc
Urban Deslan
Planninv
401 Wc,t Moun un A!Callt
Sunc'01
Fun Collin,. CD &h_ 1-_'6LL6
PHONE (970) 114-�818
FAX i970i '24 166'_
Modification Requests
In -Situ Inc. — Proposed New Office/ Light Industrial Building on
Lincoln Avenue
Modification Request No. 1:
This request is for a modification to the " Buffer Zone Performance
Standards" requirements as outlined in the Fort Collins Land Use
Code. The modification being requested is from section 3.4.1
(E)(2) Development Activities Within the Buffer Zone.
This regulation reads that:
"No disturbance shall occur within any buffer zone and no
person shall engage in any activity that will disturb, remove,
fill, dredge, clear, destroy or alter any area, including
vegetation within natural habitats or features including
without limitation lakes, ponds, stream corridors and
wetlands... "
And is further defined as:
`If the development causes any disturbance within the buffer
zone, whether by approval of the decision maker or
otherwise, the applicant shall undertake restoration and
mitigation measures within the buffer zone such as
regrading and/or the replanting of native vegetation. The
applicant shall undertake mitigation measures to restore any
damaged or lost natural resource either on -site or off -site at
the discretion of the decision maker. Any such mitigation or
restoration shall be at least equal in ecological value to the