Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIN-SITU - MODIFICATION OF STANDARDS - 46-02 - MEDIA - APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL (3)r •' IN --SITU from page 1 River, and the building would extend into the 300-foot buffer zone between develop- ment and the top bank of the Poudre. Before going through the long and costly process of submitting a proposal to the Fort Collins Development Review Process, Ripley advised In -Situ to approach the Planning and Zoning Board with their requests for modifications to the two Land Use Code requirements. .' On December 16, 2002, the Board met to review the request. Armed with a recom- mendation for approval by the Natural Resources Department, the P&Z Board approved the modifications unanimously. Within days, however, an appeal to their decision was issued by Council members Eric Hamrick and David Roy, stating that the P&Z Board failed to properly interpret and apply City Code. The appeal went before city council on February 4, 2003. Mika] Torgenson, chair- IN -SITU from page 21 had not failed to properly interpret the Code,, upholding the modification request approval. Hamrick and Roy gave the two dissenting votes, 'stating 'concerns that granting such modifications would set a precedent for future modification requests and that the modifications would reduce protection of the Poudre River wildlife habitat. "Redeveloping along the Poudre River is a once -in -a -lifetime opportunity. It must be treated as a natural area first. I was very concerned with how greatly the stan- dards were being modified," said Roy. In- Situ's preliminary design showed a reduc- tion of the buffer zone by as much as 50% in some areas and the length of the build- ing would extend to almost 255 feet. According to Torgenson; many of the concerns expressed by Roy were,the same sort the Board had wrestled with before granting the modification request. But Torgenson still felt P&Z had made the right decision.'But he did noffe'el that all the arguments presented by the dissenting councilmembers made sense. "Hamrick showed a disturbing lack of understanding man of the Planning and Zoning Board, spoke at the -meeting citing the P&Z's authority to grant modifications when "the modifications perform equally as well or greater than the Code." Ripley spoke, cit- ing the performance standards that In -Situ would adhere to in order to be granted the modifications. The performance standards included enhancing the ecological charac- ter of the site along the Poudre River with planting native vegetation within the buffer zone, developing a wetland area for wildlife habitat if passible, reversing the degradation of the site from years of mis use and provide for passive recreational use by tying in the bike and pedestrian trail way - Ripley concluded with an appeal of her own to Hamrick and Roy, "In -Situ is will- ing to take an abused site and restore its natural habitat. We are still unclear why the approval was appealed." - ,. After council members asked their own questions, council voted 4 to 2 that P&Z -see IN -SITU page 23 of City Code with his arguments" Both the P&Z Board and Natural Resources Department, felt the modifications were justified by the enhancements In -Situ would make to the land along the Poudre River. Other concerns about the property would be addressed in the Development Review Process. '- For In -Situ, this is a small victory in the uphill Battle to get their vision to a reality. If the decision would have gone against In- Situ's request, the company would have abandoned their first choice and "probably would have had to consider another area, outside the city," said co-owner Craig McKee. "We like this city a lot, it suits the values and goals we have for the compa- ny." Fort. Collins would have missed out on, a very spell -paying and environmental- ly concerned company, said Ripley. In -Situ currently employs sixty-five peo- ple. Their goal is to build on the East Lincoln site in two phases: The first phase 'Would be a 25,000 sq. foot building; with a total build -out of just over 40,000 sq. feet as,they'ezpand'in the future.'Plans will now go forward to present their proposal,to the Development Review Board. In -Situ Site Modifications Squeak Bv Council 11 -03 by Angeline Grenz -13 Forum orresnondent In -Situ, a Laramie, Wyoming - based company, is off to a rocky start in their quest to relocate to Fort Collins. After a unanimous approval by the Planning and Zoning Board (P&Z), In-Situ's request for building site modifi- cations was appealed by two council members,= with little explanation given. Early this month, a council vote upheld the P&Z's decision, saving the high - paying employer from becoming one of many businesses to look outside of Fort Collins bound- aries to build. In -Situ, manufacturer of water quality monitoring equipment and other environmental prod- ucts, knew what they wanted when they began looking at Fort Collins six months ago. The com- pany had outgrown an outdated': location in Laramie and wanted access to a larger pool of quality employees for their high -paying positions. In -Situ also wanted something very specific to Fort Collins, a location along the Poudre River that would comple- ment the type of work they do and would give employees the ability to bike to work along the Poudre River bike trails and walk or bike into Old Town for lunch, accord- ing to Linda Ripley of VF Ripley .Associates, the planning compa- ny for the project. The site In -Situ selected was 105 East Lincoln Avenue, situat- ed along the Poudre River, between Hydro Construction and Team Petroleum. The site cur- rently sits empty aside from an old house on stilts and a couple of cottonwood trees. A six-foot fence surrounds the otherwise flat piece, of property. In the past, the site was used to store truck trail- ers and other equipment. Though the site was ideal for In - Situ, two obstacles lay before the company. The building they wanted to construct 'would be wider than the 125-foot limit allowed by the Land Use Code for development along the Poudre see IN -SITU page 21