HomeMy WebLinkAboutHOWES/CANYON MIXED-USE (CORTINA) - PDP - 45-02 - CORRESPONDENCE - (4)Is a 1.5-inch water service adequate for 21 residential units? Will a .75-inch water service be adequate for
the commercial needs? Provide proposed flow rates (fixture counts) for our review.
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols
Topic: Zoning
3
Please remove landscaping from site plan - only need to see it on the landscape plan
4
Show the width of the on -site parking stalls
5
Please clarify the number of bedrooms in the penthouse units - for parking purposes
6
Show and label building envelope, dimensions and distance to property lines
7
Will the trash/recycle area be large enough to accommodate all of the uses/units in this building
8
Will there be any street lights along Canyon or Howes?
9
Show HC ramp at existing drive aisle on the west side of S Howes
10
The 4 existing Ash trees on the south side - if relocated - where will they go?
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Yours Truly,
Bob Barkeen
City Planner
Page 6
64
Due to major changes to the site plan, a detailed review of the grading plan will take place with the next
submittal.
Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control
65
1. What is going to happen to protect the area from sediment during construction of the pipelines on the
northwest corner of the site?
Please call Bob Zakely at 221-6700 for any questions.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff
Topic: Parking
58
Relocate the bike rack along Canyon near the elevator to a more visible and secure location along Canyon.
Also consider locating bike parking facilities in the underground lot for future residents.
59
Locate a handicap parking stall along Canyon that is conveniently located to the entrances along Canyon
and Howes.
Topic: Site Plan
60
If any access ramps will be replaced please construct the new ramps with truncated domes to satisfy the
new ADA standard.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: Overall Utility Plan
42
Locate and show existing electric mains with in this area. Maintain 4 feet separation between curb stops,
meter pits and electric mains.
43
Provide separate sanitary sewer services for each use (Le. residential, commercial).
44
Show and label (in all appropriate views) the existing fire line on the north edge of this site which services the
building to the west. Will a conflict occur between this line and the proposed stormceptor/storm line?
Maintain a 10 feet clear separation between the stormceptor and this existing water line.
45
Show and label all existing water and sewer services on the overall utility plans. All existing service must be
used or abandoned at the main. Include a note to coordinate all water and sewer abandonment's with the
city utilities.
46
See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Topic: Site Plan
40
Maintain a 4 feet clear separation between meter pits and bike rack pad.
41
Page 5
Please provide the benchmark identifier numbers
37
Please provide a reference to the soils report.
Topic: Utility Plan General Notes sheet
23
Please correct typos as redlined.
Department: Light & Power
Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: Electric
1
Developer will need to coordinate power requirements and electric development charges with Light &
Power Engineering.
2
Developer will need to provide a location for a pad type transformer. The source for this transformer will be
the existing electric vault at the S.E. corner of the site. An additional electric vault may be required
depending on power requirements to this site.
Department: PFA
Topic: General
Issue Contact: Michael Chavez
51
Address Numerals: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a
minimum of 6-inch numerals on a contrasting background. ( Bronze numerals on brown brick are not
acceptable).
97 UFC 901.4.4
52
Water Supply : No Commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with
a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons
of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 97 UFC 901.2.2.2
53
Sprinkler Requirement: This proposed building shall be fire sprinklered. 97 UFC 1003.29
54
Fire Alarm Requirement: This proposed building shall require a fire alarm system.
55
Underground Parking Garage: Is there only one-way in and one-way out of the parking garage? How many parking
spaces will be provided in the parking garage? What is the layout of the parking garage? Will ventilation for the parking
garage be provided?
57
Please submit building elevations.
Department: Stormwater Utility
Topic: Drainage
50
Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Please provide an existing conditions analysis regarding impervious areas and runoff. This is needed tc
determine the new hard surfaces and increase in runoff. Once this is determined, a better decision can be
made on what type of stormwater mitigation will be required relating to quantity and quality detention. The
additional lot that is being added to this site is currently all pervious area and most likely will require detention.
63
Due to this project being a PDP and the existing building completely being removed, water quality is required
with mitigation more consistent with City standards. Stormceptors are not supported by the water quality
engineer and a variance would be unlikely.
Page 4
Please label property lines/ROW lines (typ).
18
Columns in ROW must be at least 2 feet from the curb
19
There are areas where it is unclear whether plants or paving are proposed. Please clarify
Topic: Overall Utility Plan
29
Please show that driveways will be concrete to the property line.
30
The street cut note should be expanded to say: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be
determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs are to be in accordance with City street
repair standards.
31
Street cuts need to be made to the edge or middle of the lane.
39
Please dimension and label property/ROW lines.
Topic: Site Plan
12
Building doors are not allowed to open over the ROW. Please recess them or find some other solution.
13
Encroachment permits are required for seat walls/columns/steps/etc. in the ROW. Also, an agreement with
the DDA must be provided for the maintenance of these items, and for special paving.
14
The curb and gutter shown near the northmost inlet doesn't match the utility plans.
15
FYI -Utilities are not required to be shown on the site plan, but are required on the landscape plan
16
Please see redlines and landscape plan for further comments.
Topic: Storm Drain Profile
32
For Storm 1 profile: It appears that the pipe cannot be lowered; since 2' of cover to the subgrade cannot be
achieved, a geogrid/geotextile will be required above the pipe.
Topic: Utility Plan Cover Sheet
20
The title needs to be changed since symbols aren't acceptable in the title, and the title doesn't match what
is used for the Site and Landscape plans. The preamble should also have the addition of: Public
Improvement (Construction Plans For).
21
The index indicates a plat is included, but a plat was not submitted.
22
Page 3
Please see the attached ADA requirements for ped ramps and include the drawings on the detail sheet
34
Please specify which details are to be on -site only.
35
It appears that certain details are extraneous and not needed on the plans
Topic: General
36
Please see redlines and utility plan checklist for any additional comments.
47
The variance request for the driveway downslope within the ROW was not approved. Please see the
attached letter for further information.
48
The variance request for the attached sidewalk was not approved, and a bumpout will not be supported in
this location either. Please see the attached letter for further information.
49
Please provide more information regarding the underground parking south of the building
62
The following is a request: please widen the sidewalk on the east side of the building so that the full length of
the sidewalk's right edge aligns with the right edge of the sidewalk offsite to the south.
The following is a requirement: the right edges of the existing and proposed sidewalks there should align
across the driveway (the sidewalk onsite may transition to the 8' width as it heads north).
Topic: Grading plan
24
If the flowline is to be altered, please provde a profile of the new curb and gutter and how it ties to the
existing curb and gutter.
25
What are the heights and widths of the steps in the ROW?
26
Driveways need to be a maximum of 4% grade for a car length beyond the back of the sidewalk. (The
variance request for the driveway as shown was denied.)
27
What is the FF of the basement level?
28
Please show new contour lines.
38
Please provide the finish grade elevations of the lot corners.
61
How will water get out of the basement level?
Topic: Landscape plan
17
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
VF RIPLEY ASSOC
CATHY MATHIS
401 W. MOUNTAIN AVE. #201
FT. COLLINS, CO 80521
Date: 1 /13/2003
Staff has reviewed your submittal for HOWES/CANYON MIXED -USE PDP - TYPE II (LUC) -
#45-02, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Advance Planning
Topic: Site Plan
66
issue Contact: Clark Mapes
Re: Canyon R.O.W.: This is the right kind of development in the right place according to the Downtown Plan
and the emerging direction of the Downtown Strategic Plan which is currently underway. However one
ASPECT - the ramp in the Canyon Ave. public right-of-way - would interrupt the framework of streets and
blocks. Canyon is an essential part of the town plat and offers special opportunities for a major pedestrian
spine possibly as an art walk characterized by sculpture and thematic features. The framework of public
space and this special opportunity should not be allowed to be eroded on a piecemeal basis by individual
developments.
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen
Topic: Site Plan
67
A modification will need to sought for the setback standard in Section 4.12(E)(1)(o)(1), which requires new
buildings to be at a similar setback with existing buildings (along Howes Street). This can be presented to P&Z
as soon as it can be scheduled or when the project is presented for they're consideration.
68
The building will be subject to the design standards in Section 3.5.1(G)(2). It may be necessary to show
additional shadow analysis which illustrates when the single story building to the west (immediately west of
the site) leaves the shadow of the building during the winter (December 21). Also, a graphic of the building
at its proposed location should be done as well.
69
A detail of the fence surrounding the parking lot should be included. Could this fence be lowered to reduce
safety concerns, and decrease the likely hood of graffiti on it? Also, the trees shown on the lot should be
shown as removed since the underground garage is beneath them,
71
The PDP document notes that there are a total of 40 spaces provided within the underground parking. It
appears there are only 38 spaces, including the handicap spaces. Please clarify. On street parking spaces
should not be included within the calculation for the maximum number of spaces (these can not be
'claimed'towards this use).
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Topic: Building Elevations
11
Please make sure that what is shown on the building elevations matches what is shown on the grading/utility
plans (most noticeably the garage door depth).
Topic: Detail Sheet
33
Page 1