HomeMy WebLinkAboutCLOCK TOWER APARTMENTS - REPLAT - 37-02B - DECISION - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISIONClocktower Apartments PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
April 10, 2003 cont. from March 24
Page 5 of 5
Transportation Level of Service Requirements
Section 3.6 of the LUC imposes standards for all modes of transportation. The
Staff Report indicates that the Project is in compliance with Section 3.6 of the
LUC. Due to the nature of the use, and the fact that a fraternity was previously
located on the site, a Transportation Impact Study was not submitted.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
A. The Clocktower Apartments Project Development Plan is subject to
administrative review and the requirements of the Land Use Code (LUC).
B. The Clocktower Apartments Project Development Plan complies with all
applicable district standards of Section 4.5 of the Land Use Code, (MMN)
medium density mixed use neighborhood zone district.
C. The Clocktower Apartments Project Development Plan complies with all
applicable General Development Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land
Use Code.
DECISION
The Clocktower Apartments Project Development Plan #37-02A, is hereby approved by
the Hearing Officer without condition.
Dated this 10th day of April 2003, per authority granted by Sections
1.4.9(E) and 2.1 of the Land Use Code. 11-1�
Cd_
Current Pla6hina Director
Clocktower Apartments PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
April 10, 2003 cont. from March 24
Page 4 of 5
Landscaping and Tree Protection. The staff report outlines the Project's
compliance with Section 3.2.1 concerning landscaping and tree protection and
there was no evidence introduced at the hearing to contradict the Staff Report.
Parking and Access. The staff report outlines the Project's compliance with
Section 3.2.2 concerning access, circulation and parking. A total of 63 off-street
parking spaces are required where a total of 48 off-street parking spaces are
provided on the subject property. 15 additional off-street parking spaces will be
provided in a lot immediately southwest of the site, which the applicant is partial
owner of. The parking lot is located behind the building. Several landscape
islands are included within the lot. Landscaping has been provided to screen this
facility from adjacent residential uses.
There was considerable discussion at the hearing from neighboring residents
regarding the fence that lies in between the parking area and adjacent lots to the
south, relative to its design and materials. The original six (6) foot -high fence
design, depicted on page 4 of the plan submittal, showed a painted steel fence
with pickets spaced one (1) foot apart and brick columns every twenty (20) feet
apart. The applicant has revised the design, based on concerns expressed by
the neighborhood, that results in a six (6) foot -high solid wood fence, with brick
columns placed twenty- (20) feet on -center.
Therefore, based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Project complies
with Section 3.2.2 of the LUC.
Solar Access, Orientation, Shading
The Hearing Officer finds that the Project is in conformance with the solar access
standards specified in this section.
Building and Project Compatibility
Section 3.5.1 of the LUC requires that new developments be compatible with the
established character of the area. Pursuant to this section, the proposed building
includes architectural details, building materials, and forms that are similar to
existing buildings in the area.
Residential Building_ Standards
The staff report outlines the Project's conformance with Section 3.5.2 concerning
the design of residential buildings. Specifically, the proposal provides for the
building to face and provide direct access to Birch Street.
Clocktower Apartments PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
April 10, 2003 cont. from March 24
Page 3 of 5
From the Public:
Georgine Bush, 1504 Emigh Street
Marty Osecky, 708 City Park Avenue
Peter Wilson, 720 City Park Avenue
Michael Smith, Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity
Written Comments:
Letter from Susan James, President, Chi Zeta House Corp dated April 9, 2003
FACTS AND FINDINGS
1. Site Context/Background Information
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: LMN — Chi Omega Sorority;
E: MMN — vacant (CSU);
S: MMN — Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity
W: MMN — Delta Delta Delta Sorority.
The property was annexed into the City as part of the College Addition First
Annexation in June 1956.
2. Compliance with Article 4 and the MMN — Medium Density Mixed Use
Zoning District Standards:
The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable requirements of
Article 4 and the MMN zone district. The Staff Report summarizes the PDP's
compliance with these standards and no specific evidence was presented to
contradict or otherwise refute the compliance with Article 4 or the MMN District
Standards. In particular, the proposed multi -family residential use is permitted
within the MMN zone district subject to an administrative review. The proposed
residential exceeds the minimum of seven (7) dwelling units per acre in "infill
areas" zoned MMN. There was no direct testimony or evidence presented at the
public hearing to contradict the Project's compliance with these standards.
3. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development
Standards
The project development plan complies with all applicable sections of Article 3 of
the LUC as explained below.
Clocktower Apartments PDP
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
April 10, 2003 cont. from March 24
Page 2 of 5
SUMMARY OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION: Approval
ZONING DISTRICT: MMN — Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Evidence presented to the Hearing Officer established
no controversy or facts to refute that the hearing was
properly posted, legal notices mailed and notice
published. Note: the hearing was continued from
March 24th to April 10th to address deficiencies in the
written public notice; adequate notice was provided
for the continued hearing.
The Hearing Officer, presiding pursuant to the Fort Collins Land Use Code, opened the
hearing at approximately 4:00 p.m. on March 24, 2003 in Conference Rooms A and B,
281 N. College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado and continued the hearing to April 10,
2003. The April 10, 2003 hearing began at approximately 8:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers at 300 La Porte Avenue.
HEARING TESTIMONY, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER EVIDENCE:
The Hearing Officer accepted during the hearing the following evidence: (1) Planning
Department Staff Report; (2) application, plans, maps and other supporting documents
submitted by the applicant and the applicant's representatives to the City of Fort Collins;
and (3) a tape recording of public testimony provided during the hearing. The LUC, the
City's Comprehensive Plan (City Plan), and the formally promulgated policies of the City
are all considered part of the evidence considered by the Hearing Officer.
The following is a list of those who attended the meeting:
From the City:
Bob Barkeen, City Planner
Sheri Wamhoff, Development Review Engineer
From the Applicant:
Barbara Siek
Jeff Benham, Edge Architecture
Comm •,v Planning and Environmenta ,..vices
Current Planning
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
City of Fort Collins ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
TYPE I ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DATE: April 10, 2003 (cont. from March 24)
PROJECT NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
HEARING OFFICER:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Clocktower Apartments Project
Development Plan
#37-02A
Jupiter -Bar, LLC
P.O. Box 1613
Fort Collins, CO 80522
Jupiter -Bar, LLC
P.O. Box 1613
Fort Collins, CO 80522
Cameron Gloss
Current Planning Director
The Applicant has submitted a Project Development Plan (referred to herein as the
"Project" or the "PDP") proposing a 36-unit multi -family residential project located at the
southwest corner of Wagner Drive and Birch Drive. This is the site of the former Sigma -
Nu fraternity house. The existing building would be razed and be replaced with a three-
story structure that will front onto Birch Drive. Parking will be provided within the rear of
the lot, and take access from an adjacent private drive to the west and Wagner Drive.
An adjacent parking lot to the southwest of this lot will provide additional parking. The
Planning and Zoning Board approved this parking modification as a modification on
October 17, 2002. The property is zoned MMN — Medium Density Mixed -Use
Neighborhood District.
A subdivision plat is part of the PDP application. This plat will dedicate necessary
easements and remove a note that limits the setback along Birch Drive to 25 feet.
281 North College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020