Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCLOCK TOWER APARTMENTS - PDP - 37-02A - REPORTS - PLANNING OBJECTIVESsurrounding buildings, and is designed to take on a "Colorado Lodge" look. (ii) This project is within blocks of the CSU athletic fields and our target tenant is the CSU student. Therefore we have opted to reduce open space on the site. All existing mature street trees are being maintained in this development proposal, as is the surrounding turf grass. We are also proposing shrubs between the parking lot and the neighbor in order to reduce the conflict generated by car lights and to buffer the parking lot from their property. (iii) The project is intended to be privately owned by Jupiter -Bar LLC. This owner will manage and maintain the property. (v) The project is designed to utilize as much of the existing fraternity house as possible as well as to maintain a positive relationship between the street and the new building. We also designed the building to offer a strong landmark feature to the corner of Birch and Wagner. Parking was tucked behind the building With a private alley access. This minimizes the unsightly aspects of the parking lot for the public. (vii) There are no known wetlands or natural areas either on or adjacent to the site. Landscaping is provided between the proposed project and the adjacent neighbors in an effort to provide a transition between land uses. (ix) The project is being called "The Clock Tower Apartments". (1) The developer wishes to commence development as soon as possible following approval of the project. Because of the student rental cycle it is imperative that construction be completed at least two weeks before the 2003 Fall Semester begins. (9) We contacted Eric Brackie of the City of Fort Collins Traffic Department about whether a transportation impact analysis would be required on this project. He felt that since we were minimally increasing the number of residents, the new impact was negligible and did not require a TIS. (10) A modification to the required parking standard 3.2.2(K)(1)(a) was requested and approved by the Planning and Zoning Board. The P&Z board approved an overall reduction of the required on -site parking requirement by 15 parking stalls. (14) A title search was conducted by Security Title Guaranty Company, and a policy was issued which has no exceptions for mineral rights holders other than the surface right owner. See attached. Sincerely, v Mal Torgerson _2 M. Torgerson Architects r December 3, 2002 Bob Barkeen Planner City of Fort Collins 281 North College Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Dear Bob: Attached is a PDP application for a 35 unit designated affordable apartment project we propose at 701 Wagner Drive. The property is owned by Jupiter -Bar LLC, which is entirely owned by Barbara Seik. Statement of Planning Objectives: (i) The project as proposed furthers the following goals and policies of City Plan. Section 1.2.2 C states that one purpose of the code is to "foster safe, efficient and economic use of the land, the city's transportation infrastructure, and other public facilities and services". The project as proposed is clearly an efficient use of the land and because it is a relatively dense affordable housing project on a major bus route, it will also promote the efficient use of the city's transportation infrastructure. Section 1.2.2 F "encouraging patterns of land use which decrease trip length of automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation" is furthered by this project because the development has a high density, and as an infill project near the city's core, it will likely decrease VMT. Section 1.2.2'G "increasing public access to mass transit, sidewalks, trails, bicycle routes and other alternative modes of transportation." This project furthers this goal by providing affordable housing on a major bus route, therefore increasing public access to mass transit. Section 1.2.2 (H) "reducing energy consumption and demand." Attached multi -family construction is an inherently energy efficient housing type, and therefore furthers this goal. Section 1.2.2 (L) "encouraging the development of vacant properties within established areas." As this project is an infill type development replacing a building that has stood vacant for over a year, it clearly furthers this goal. Section 1.2.2 (M) "ensuring that development proposals are sensitive to the character of existing neighborhoods". The architecture we are proposing is similar in massing and scale to Maorgerson 223 Norlh College foil Collins, C0 80524 970.416.7431 1.888.416.7431 fax: 970.416.7435 Email: mikal®orchifex.com hmp://wwwarckilex.com